DOCSLIB.ORG

Sunnica West Site Sunnica Ltd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sunnica West Site Sunnica Ltd SUNNICA ENERGY FARM Appendix 7A: Sunnica West Site Sunnica Ltd AUGUST 2020 www.sunnica.co.uk Sunnica Energy Farm Heritage Desk Based Assessment Sunnica West Site Quality information Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by Sophie Carver Andrew Pearson Helen Maclean Clare Le Brecht (Graduate (Principal (Technical Director, (Associate Director) Archaeological Archaeologist) Archaeology) Consultant) Amy Jones (Associate Katerina Koukouthaki Director, Built Heritage) (Built Heritage Consultant) Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position 0 05/04/19 Issue CLB Clare Le Brecht Associate Director Prepared for: Sunnica Ltd. Prepared by: Sophie Carver and Katerina Koukouthaki AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited Unit 1 Wellbrook Court Girton Cambridge CB3 0NA United Kingdom T: +44 1223 488 000 aecom.com © 2020 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. AECOM Sunnica Energy Farm Heritage Desk Based Assessment Sunnica West Site Table of Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................. 1 Background ................................................................................................................................ 1 Objectives .................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Sunnica West Site Description ................................................................ 3 3. Legislation and Planning Policy............................................................... 5 Legislation .................................................................................................................................. 5 National Planning Policy ............................................................................................................ 6 Policy Guidance ......................................................................................................................... 8 Historic England Good Practice Advice Notes ........................................................................... 8 Local Plan Policy ........................................................................................................................ 9 Research Framework ............................................................................................................... 13 Chartered Institute for Archaeologists ...................................................................................... 13 4. Methodology for determining the heritage baseline .............................. 14 Study Area ................................................................................................................................ 14 Asset identification ................................................................................................................... 14 Site visit .................................................................................................................................... 14 Data Sources ........................................................................................................................... 15 Assumptions and Data Gaps ................................................................................................... 15 Assessment Methodology ........................................................................................................ 16 Significance of Heritage Assets ............................................................................................... 16 Archaeological Potential........................................................................................................... 16 5. Heritage baseline .................................................................................. 17 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 17 Designated Assets ................................................................................................................... 17 Non-designated assets ............................................................................................................ 18 Geology and soils ..................................................................................................................... 19 Archaeological and historical narrative .................................................................................... 19 Previous archaeological investigations .................................................................................... 32 6. Assessment of the baseline .................................................................. 35 Archaeological potential ........................................................................................................... 35 Statement of significance ......................................................................................................... 37 7. Conclusions ........................................................................................... 42 8. References ............................................................................................ 43 Textual sources ........................................................................................................................ 43 Aerial photographs ................................................................................................................... 45 Appendix A Asset Gazetteer ............................................................................ 35 Appendix B Events Gazetteer ......................................................................... 40 Appendix C Sunnica West Site Addendum ..................................................... 43 AECOM Sunnica Energy Farm Heritage Desk Based Assessment Sunnica West Site Figures Figure 1. Site Location .......................................................................................................................... 44 Figure 2. Designated assets within the 5km study area: overview ....................................................... 45 Figure 2.1. Designated assets within the 5km study area: detail – north-west ..................................... 46 Figure 2.2. Designated assets within the 5km study area: detail – north-east ..................................... 47 Figure 2.3. Designated assets within the 5km study area: detail – south-west .................................... 48 Figure 2.4. Designated assets within the 5km study area: detail – south-east ..................................... 49 Figure 3. Archaeological assets within the 1km study area: overview .................................................. 50 Figure 3.1. Archaeological assets within the 1km study area: detail– north-west ................................ 51 Figure 3.2. Archaeological assets within the 1km study area: detail – north-east ................................ 52 Figure 3.3. Archaeological assets within the 1km study area: detail – south-west ............................... 53 Figure 3.4. Archaeological assets within the 1km study area: detail – south-east ............................... 54 Figure 4. Built heritage assets within the 1km study area .................................................................... 55 AECOM Sunnica Energy Farm Heritage Desk Based Assessment Sunnica West Site 1. Introduction 1.1.1 The Sunnica West Site Desk Based Assessment (DBA) was prepared in April 2019 and the DCO Site boundary reported within this report was correct at that time. A high level analysis has been carried out and the findings of this report are still considered valid for the PEI Report. However an update has been provided for Sunnica West Site in Addendum C. Background Sunnica Ltd (hereafter referred to as ‘the Applicant’) has commissioned AECOM to produce desk-based assessments to inform an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of the Sunnica Energy Farm (hereafter referred to as the ‘Scheme’). This comprises the installation of solar photovoltaic (PV) generating panels and on-site energy storage facilities across two proposed sites: Sunnica East Site and Sunnica West Site, within Suffolk and Cambridgeshire respectively; and associated infrastructure for connection to the national grid. Objectives This desk-based assessment is a preliminary stage of the heritage aspect of the EIA. It is one of three parallel reports: it pertains to the Sunnica West Site, with the other two reports addressing the Sunnica East Site and the national grid connection respectively. The objectives of this document are: • to place the Scheme within its full historic and archaeological context through the collection of baseline information; • to identify, map and assess the significance of all designated and non- designated heritage assets present within the Sunnica West Site and the surrounding study area (as defined in Section 4.2 below); • in relation to the above, to assess components of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Suffolk County Council
    Suffolk County Council Western Suffolk Employment Land Review Final Report May 2009 GVA Grimley Ltd 10 Stratton Street London W1J 8JR 0870 900 8990 www.gvagrimley.co.uk This report is designed to be printed double sided. Suffolk County Council Western Suffolk Employment Land Review Final Report May 2009 Reference: P:\PLANNING\621\Instruction\Clients\Suffolk County Council\Western Suffolk ELR\10.0 Reports\Final Report\Final\WesternSuffolkELRFinalReport090506.doc Contact: Michael Dall Tel: 020 7911 2127 Email: [email protected] www.gvagrimley.co.uk Suffolk County Council Western Suffolk Employment Land Review CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 1 2. POLICY CONTEXT....................................................................................................... 5 3. COMMERCIAL PROPERTY MARKET ANALYSIS.................................................... 24 4. EMPLOYMENT LAND SUPPLY ANALYSIS.............................................................. 78 5. EMPLOYMENT FLOORSPACE PROJECTIONS..................................................... 107 6. BALANCING DEMAND AND SUPPLY .................................................................... 147 7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS......................................................... 151 Suffolk County Council Western Suffolk Employment Land Review LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 The Western Suffolk Study Area 5 Figure 2 Claydon Business Park, Claydon 26 Figure 3 Industrial Use in
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to This A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon Improvement Scheme Public Exhibition. This Exhibition Is About the Work We Are Doing
    A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon improvement scheme A1 Welcome Alconbury D3 Woolley A141 S2 Huntingdon St Ives A14 Town centre improvements including removal of A14 viaduct Ellington D3 The Hemingfords Brampton D2 Existing A14 Godmanchester Fenstanton Fen Drayton Proposed A14 Swavesey Buckden D3 D3 D2 The Offords A1 Northstowe Hilton Conington New development S2 A1198 D3 Boxworth Lolworth Histon Bar Hill D4 Milton Girton A14 D3 M11 Routes for construction traffic East Coast Mainline railway Cambridge River Great Ouse A428 Huntingdon Southern Bypass S2 Single 2 lane carriageway A1 widening D2 Dual 2 lane carriageway A14 on-line improvements D3 Dual 3 lane carriageway Cambridge Northern Bypass D4 Dual 4 lane carriageway Local access roads © Crown copyright and database rights 2016 Ordnance Survey 100030649 Highways England, creative S160069 Welcome to this A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon improvement scheme public exhibition. This exhibition is about the work we are doing in Huntingdon as part of the A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon improvement scheme. Members of the project team are here to answer any questions you might have. Thank you Highways England – Creative BED19_0157 A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon improvement scheme Why is the scheme necessary? The A14 provides an east- west route linking the Midlands with East Anglia. It begins at Catthorpe near Rugby, where it connects with the M1 and M6 motorway, and continues east for approximately 130 miles to the port town of Felixstowe. It forms one of the UK’s strategic routes and is part of the Trans-European Transport Network. The A14 between Cambridge and Huntingdon serves an additional purpose, connecting the A1(M) motorway to the North The scheme will: of England with the M11 motorway � combat congestion, making the to London and the South East.
    [Show full text]
  • We Work for You
    We work for you Annual Report and Accounts 2012 Overview | Performance Highlights and Financial Summary Performance Highlights Pre-tax profit1 Underlying earnings per share1 Dividends per share − 7% −1% +2% 2012 £310m 2012 35.0p 2012 14.1p 2011 £334m 2011 35.5p 2011 13.8p 2010 £306m 2010 32.7p 2010 12.7p Financial Summary (£m unless otherwise specified) 2012 2011 Change (%) Revenue including joint ventures and associates 10,896 11,035 (1) Group revenue 9,483 9,494 – Profit from continuing operations – underlying1 309 331 (7) – reported 74 243 (70) Pre-tax profit from continuing operations – underlying1 310 334 (7) – reported 75 246 (70) Earnings per share from continuing operations – underlying1 35.0p 35.5p (1) – basic 6.5p 26.7p (76) Dividends per share 14.1p 13.8p 2 Financing – net cash before PPP subsidiaries (non-recourse) 35 340 – net borrowings of PPP subsidiaries (non-recourse) (368) (332) 1 From continuing operations, before non-underlying items. Balfour Beatty differentiates itself through strong local businesses, global sector expertise and end-to-end capabilities including the ability to develop and finance. Ian Tyler Chief Executive Go online to watch our film www.balfourbeatty.com/ AR2012 We work Day in, day out around the world, Balfour Beatty teams are working with their clients and partners to fund, design, Overview deliver, operate and maintain infrastructure efficiently and safely. For you For everyone. Our business is creating the infrastructure assets that help communities, society and nations to live, thrive and grow. For the future We are focused on geographical regions and key market sectors that will enable us to prosper today and grow sustainably for years to come.
    [Show full text]
  • 49 New Street Chippenham, Cambridgeshire
    49 New Street Chippenham, Cambridgeshire 49 New Street Chippenham, Cambridgeshire, CBCB77 5QF The Pr operty • Light and spacious accommodation lines into London, with the fastest trains taking under one • Entrance hall hour. Stansted International Airport is approximately 36 49 New Street is a well presented individual family house in miles. • 2 reception rooms a sought after village with an enclosed garden. • Newmarket 4 miles • Study Built approximately ten years ago, this attractive deta ched • Kitchen/breakfast room • Ely 10 miles house has brick elevations under a slate roof with double • Utility room and cloakroom • Bury St Edmunds 13 miles glazing and oil fired central heating. The well configured • Cambridge 16 miles accommodation incorporates two reception rooms, a study , • 4 bedrooms (2 en-suite) and family bathroom • kitchen/breakfast room, utility room, cloakroom, four • Driveway with parking London 73 miles (distances approximate) bedrooms (two en-suite) and family bathroom. • Enclosed rear garden The entrance hall has stairs to the first floor, a built-in Directions understairs storage cupboard and tiled floor. The Outside From Newmarket Clock Tower roundabout signposted kitchenkitchen/breakfast/breakfast room has two windows to the front , Ely/Fordham proceed out along the Fordham Road. Take fitted base and eye level units, central island with units 49 New Street has a block paved driveway to the front the first right into Snailwell Road. Follow this road through below, wood effect worktops with tiled splashbacks, providing parking for several cars and access to the garage . the village of Snailwell and onto the village of Chippenham. stainless steel sink with drainer, integrated appliances The single garage has an up and over door to the front, On entering Chippenham turn right at the T junction onto including Rangemaster style cooker with five ring hob , power and light and sensored lighting.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Ubiquitous Computing with Sensor Networks in Urban Environments
    Evolution of Ubiquitous Computing with Sensor Networks in Urban Environments Eiko Yoneki University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory Cambridge CB3 0FD, United Kingdom [email protected] ABSTRACT of smart WSNs with a bigger network such as the Internet A significant increase in real world event monitoring capability increases the coverage area and application domain of the with wireless sensor networks will lead to a further evolution of ad hoc network. Based on such a technological vision, new ubiquitous computing. This paper describes this evolution, lead- types of applications will rely on ad hoc connections between ing to humans being connected to the real world via comput- nearby nodes to establish multi-hop dynamic routes in order ers without awareness. We address an ad hoc communication to propagate data and messages between out-of-range nodes. paradigm, a data-centric approach, and a middleware’s task, to Sensors could be attached to any object, which may move understand the ultimate goal of this new world. We also briefly around, or be placed stationally. Furthermore sensors could explain our upcoming new traffic monitoring project in the city be attached to the human body creating Personal Area Net- of Cambridge. work (PAN). The communication among objects, humans, and computers happens at home, at an office, on a street, at EMERGENCE OF WIRELESS SENSOR NET- the train station, in a car, in a restaurant, or in other places at any time. Fig.1 shows application spaces for ubiquitous WORKS computing with WSNs. Ubiquitous Computing opens com- The evolution of cyber space started from mainframe com- munications over tiny sensor networks through Internet scale puters and moved to PCs.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation for Conservation of Rural Road Verges
    OCCASIONAL REPORTS No. 2 -OPERATION FOR CONSERVATION OF RURAL ROAD VERGES Co-operation between County Highway Departments and Conservation Organisations on the management of rural road verges and conservation of Sites of Special Interest A report based on information obtained from County Council Highway Departments, The County Naturalists' Trusts, Regional Officers of the Nature Conservancy Council, and the Biological Records Centre, up to May 1974 MONKS WOOD EXPERIMENTAL STATION The Institute of Terrestrial Ecology (Natural Environment Research Council) Abbots Ripton, Huntingdon. INDEX Chapter I Introduction Chapter 11 Nature Conrervancy Southvert Ragion 1. Corwall 2. Devon 3. Dorret 4. Gloucerterrhire 5. Smerret Chapter I11 Nature Conservancy South Region 17 6. Berkrhire 7. Buckinghamrhire 8. Pmprhire 9. Inla of Wight 10. Oxfordrhire 11. Wiltrhire Chapter IV Nature Conrervancy Southeart Region 37 12. Hertfordrhire 13. Kent 14. Surrey 15. Eart Surrex 16. Wert Surra Chapter V Nature Conrervmcy Midland Region Cherhire Derbyrhire Herefordahire Leicer terrhire Northamptonahire Nottinghamrhire Rutland Shroprhire Staffordahire Warwickrhire Worcerterrhire Chapter VI Nature Conrervancy Eart Anglia Region Bedfordrhire Cambridge and Isle of Ely Errex Huntingdon and Plterborough Lincolnrhire - Holland Ker teven Lindrey Norfolk Ear t Suffolk Wert Suffolk Chapter VII Nature Conservancy North Region Cumber1 and 110 Durham 112 Lancashire 116 Northumberland 118 Wertmorland 120 Yorkrhire - East Riding 122 North Riding 1Z4 West Riding 126 Chapter VIII Nature Conrervancy North Wale8 Region 46. Anglesey 47. Caemrvonshire 48. Denbighshire 49. Flintshire 50. Merionethrhire 51. Hontgomeryshire Chapter IX Nature Conservancy South Wales Region 52. Brecknockshire 53. Cardiganahire 54. Camarthenshire 55. Glamorgan 56. Monmouthrhire 57. Pembrokerhire 58. Rndmrshire Chapter X Scotland Chapter XI Analysis of plant rpecier mentioned 153 Acknowledgements Bibliography Appendix A 169 Appendix B 179 Explanation of layout of lirtr of rite8 of Conservation Inside Importance in the report.
    [Show full text]
  • A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon Improvement Scheme
    A14 CAMBRIDGE TO HUNTINGDON IMPROVEMENT SCHEME DEVELOPMENT CONSENT ORDER - EXAMINATION Representation on Local Traffic Impacts By Cambridgeshire County Council Shire Hall, Castle Hill, Cambridge, CB3 0AP 2 September 2015 A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon Development Consent Order Written Representation on Local Traffic for Deadline 8 CONTENTS CONTENTS 2 1. INTRODUCTION 3 2. CHARM TRAFFIC MODEL 4 3. LOCAL TRAFFIC IMPACTS 6 3.2 Local Impact Report 7 4. SPECIFIC ISSUES 8 4.2 B1514 Brampton Road 8 4.3 Hinchingbrooke 8 4.4 Spittals 9 4.5 Galley Hill 9 5. ADDITIONAL WORK 10 6. MONITORING 12 7. INTERACTION WITH OTHER DEVELOPMENTS 13 7.1 Northstowe 13 7.2 A428 13 APPENDIX A - EXISTING NORTHSTOWE MONITORING 16 APPENDIX B – ADDITIONAL MONITORING LOCATIONS 18 APPENDIX C – ROAD CLOSURE GUIDELINES 19 APPENDIX D – SYSTRA REPORT 25 Page 2 A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon Development Consent Order Written Representation on Local Traffic for Deadline 8 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1.1 This Written Representation is in respect of Local Traffic Impacts and supersedes Chapter 10 of the County Council’s previous written representation (REP3-006) 1.1.2 This Written Representation, in respect of the A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon Improvement Scheme (the Scheme) Development Consent Order (the Order or DCO), is made in accordance with the Infrastructure Planning (Examination Procedure) Rules 2010, Rule 10. It must be read in conjunction with the Local Impact Report submitted for Deadline 8. 1.1.3 The Local Impact Report presents local traffic impacts and recommendations for mitigation. Information in the Local Impact Report is generally not repeated in this document.
    [Show full text]
  • SUFFOLK LOCAL PLAN MODELLING Forecasting Report - Forecasts with Demand Adjustments
    Suffolk County Council SUFFOLK LOCAL PLAN MODELLING Forecasting Report - Forecasts with demand adjustments SCC LP 9.2 OCTOBER 2020 PUBLIC Suffolk County Council SUFFOLK LOCAL PLAN MODELLING Forecasting Report - Forecasts with demand adjustments TYPE OF DOCUMENT (VERSION) PUBLIC PROJECT NO. 70044944 OUR REF. NO. SCC LP 9.2 DATE: OCTOBER 2020 WSP WSP House 70 Chancery Lane London WC2A 1AF Phone: +44 20 7314 5000 Fax: +44 20 7314 5111 WSP.com PUBLIC QUALITY CONTROL Issue/revision First issue Revision 1 Revision 2 Revision 3 Remarks Draft Draft Final Date July 2020 September 2020 October 2020 Prepared by Louise Murray- Leonardo Mendes Leonardo Mendes Bruce Signature Checked by Leonardo Mendes Charlotte Herridge Charlotte Herridge Signature Authorised by Michael Johns Michael Johns Michael Johns Signature Project number 70044944 70044944 70044944 Report number SCC_LP 9.0 SCC_LP 9.1 SCC_LP 9.2 File reference SUFFOLK LOCAL PLAN MODELLING PUBLIC | WSP Project No.: 70044944 | Our Ref No.: SCC LP 9.2 October 2020 Suffolk County Council CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 GLOSSARY 1 2 INTRODUCTION 4 2.1 BACKGROUND 4 2.2 TRANSPORT MODEL 4 2.3 STUDY AREA 6 2.4 FUTURE HIGHWAY SCHEMES 11 2.5 FORECAST DEVELOPMENT ASSUMPTIONS 14 3 RESULTS 16 3.1 SUFFOLK HIGHWAY FOCUS 16 3.2 VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIO 16 3.3 MODEL RUNS COMPARED 16 3.4 PASSENGER CAR UNIT HOUR DELAY REDUCTION BY LPA – DEMAND ADJUSTMENT IMPACT 17 3.5 OVERALL JUNCTION V/C SUMMARY BY LPA – DEMAND ADJUSTMENT IMPACT 22 3.6 OVERALL LINK V/C SUMMARY BY LPA – DEMAND ADJUSTMENT IMPACT 25 3.7 RESULTS SUMMARIES
    [Show full text]
  • The Walled Garden Snailwell, Suffolk
    The Walled Garden Snailwell, Suffolk The Walled Garden 9 Church Lane, Snailwell, NewNewmarket,market, Suffolk, CB8 7LZ7LZ A spacious and superbly presented property in Features a private edge of village location with inviting • Sought after and quiet village location grounds, paddocks and stables extending to • Attractive countryside views from the garden and paddocks • 2 reception rooms approximately 3 acres in all (sts) • Superb kitchen/dining room with Aga • Study/bedroom 4 • Utility room • 2 ground floor bedrooms and superbly finished shower room • 1st floor master bedroom and bathroom • Driveway with parking for several cars and single garage • Large established south facing garden • Stables and 2 large paddocks 3 acres in all (sts) Outside The Walled Garden is approached through a pair of five bar wooden gates leading to a gravel driveway providing turning and parking for several cars and access to the garage. The single garage has an up and over door to the front, power and light. The charming and private partly walled garden surrounding the property is a particular feature with well maintained lawns, an abundance of shrubs and flowers including honeysuckle, mahonia, roses and lavender, fig and apple trees, box hedging and gravel paths. There is a superb vegetable garden with raised beds, chicken enclosure, original potting shed and large York stone paved terrace. A five bar wooden gate leads to the three stables, tack/feed room and two post and rail paddocks. The Location The Walled Garden is set in a quiet edge of village location enjoying views towards St Peter’s church and is well situated with easy access to Newmarket and the A11.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Papers
    Council Agenda Date Thursday 22 February 2018 Members of the Council Mr D C Ward Mrs J Leggett (Chairman) (Vice Chairman) Time 7.00pm Mr A D Adams Miss T E Lodge Mrs C H Bannock Mr I J Mackie Mr D Buck Mr A M Mallett Mr P H Carrick Mrs T M Mancini-Boyle Place Mr S M Clancy Mr I N Moncur Council Chamber Mrs J K Copplestone Mr G K Nurden Mr S Dunn Mr F O'Neill Thorpe Lodge Mr J J Emsell Mr G Peck Mr G Everett Mr A J Proctor 1 Yarmouth Road Mr J F Fisher Mr V Ray-Mortlock Thorpe St Andrew Mr R R Foulger Mr S Riley Mr R F Grady Mrs B H Rix Norwich Mr I G Graham Mr D Roper Mrs S C Gurney Mr N C Shaw Mr C Harrison Mr M D Snowling MBE Contact Mr D G Harrison Mr V B Tapp Mrs L H Hempsall Mrs K A Vincent Dawn Matthews tel (01603) 430404 Miss J R Keeler Mr S A Vincent Mr R J Knowles Mr J M Ward Broadland District Mr B S Kular Mr F Whymark Council Mr T W Landamore Mr D B Willmott Thorpe Lodge Miss S Lawn Mr S D Woodbridge 1 Yarmouth Road Mr K G Leggett MBE Thorpe St Andrew Norwich NR7 0DU E-mail: [email protected] @BDCDemServices Group meetings: Conservative Group Trafford Room (6.00pm) Liberal Democrat Group John Mack Room (6.00pm) 14 February 2018 The Openness of Local Government Bodies Regulations 2014 Under the above Regulations, any person may take photographs, film and audio-record the proceedings and report on all public meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sizewell C Project
    The Sizewell C Project 6.3 Volume 2 Main Development Site Chapter 8 Conventional Waste and Material Resources Appendix 8A Waste Management Strategy Revision: 1.0 Applicable Regulation: Regulation 5(2)(a) PINS Reference Number: EN010012 May 2020 Planning Act 2008 Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Sizewell C Waste Management Strategy 02 March 2020 Mott MacDonald Mott MacDonald House 8-10 Sydenham Road Croydon CR0 2EE United Kingdom T +44 (0)20 8774 2000 F +44 (0)20 8681 5706 mottmac.com Sizewell C Waste Management 346846 1 D Strategy Mott MacDonald 02 March 2020 Mott MacDonald Limited. Registered in England and Wales no. 1243967. Registered office: Mott MacDonald House, 8-10 Sydenham Road, Croydon CR0 2EE, United Kingdom Mott MacDonald | Sizewell C Waste Management Strategy Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Introduction 3 1.2 Objectives 4 1.3 Scope 4 1.4 Methodology 5 2 Waste Policy 7 2.1 Introduction 7 2.2 Legislative considerations 7 2.2.1 Waste Framework Directive (2008/98/EC) 7 2.2.2 Landfill Directive (1999/31/EC) 7 2.2.3 Hazardous Waste Directive (91/689/EEC) 7 2.3 National Legislation 7 2.3.1 The Environmental Protection Act 1990 8 2.3.2 The Waste (England and Wales) Regulations 2011 (2011/988) 8 2.3.3 Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016 (2016/1154) 8 2.3.4 Controlled Waste Regulations 2012 9 2.3.5 Hazardous Waste (England and Wales) Regulations 2005 9 2.3.6 Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Regulations 2013 9 2.3.7 Waste Batteries and Accumulators
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England
    LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REVIEW OF GREATER LONDON, THE LONDON BOROUGHS AND THE CITY OF LONDON LONDON BOROUGH OF NEWHAM Boundaries with: REDBRIDGE LB WALTHAM FOREST LB HACKNEY LB TOWER HAMLETS LB and GREENWICH LB WALTHAM FOREST REDBRIDGE HACKNEY BARKING and DAGENHAM NEWHAM TOWER HAMLETS GREENWICH REPORT NO. 661 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REPORT NO 661 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Mr K F J Ennals CB MEMBERS Mr G Prentice Mrs H R V Sarkany Mr C W Smith Professor K Young CONTENTS Paragraphs Introduction 1-6 Our approach to the review of Greater London 7-11 Docklands 12 The initial submissions made to us 13 Our draft and further draft proposals letters and the responses to them 14-17 Newham/Greenwich boundary 18 Newham/Redbridge boundary Romford Road/Little Ilford (the A406) 19-25 Aldersbrook Estate, the City of London Cemetery, and Wanstead Flats 26 Aldersbrook Estate 27-29 City of London Cemetery and Wanstead Flats 30-40 Newham/Walthatn Forest boundary Crownfield Road/Cann Hall Road 41-52 Stratford New Town 53-55 The A12 Hackney Wick-Mi 1 Link Road 56-60 Newham/Hacknev boundary River Lee 61-64 Newham/Tower Hamlets boundary River Lee 65-67 Electoral Consequentials 68 Conclusion 69 Publication 70-71 RT HON MICHAEL HOWARD QC HP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT REVIEW OF THE LONDON BOROUGHS AND THE CITY OF LONDON. THE LONDON BOROUGH OF NEWHAH AND ITS BOUNDARIES WITH THE LONDON BOROUGHS OF REDBRIDGE, GREENWICH, WALTHAM FOREST, HACKNEY AND TOWER HAMLETS THE COMMISSION'S FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS INTRODUCTION 1 .
    [Show full text]