Investigating the Causes of Repeated Presidential Failure in South America Margaret Edwards
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Political Science ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2-13-2014 Investigating the Causes of Repeated Presidential Failure in South America Margaret Edwards Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/pols_etds Recommended Citation Edwards, Margaret. "Investigating the Causes of Repeated Presidential Failure in South America." (2014). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/pols_etds/11 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Political Science ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Margaret E. Edwards Candidate Political Science Department This dissertation is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication: Approved by the Dissertation Committee: William Stanley, Co-Chairperson Kathryn Hochstetler, Co-Chairperson Wendy Hansen Benjamin Goldfrank i INVESTIGATING THE CAUSES OF REPEATED PRESIDENTIAL FAILURE IN SOUTH AMERICA by MARGARET E. EDWARDS B.A., Political Science and History, University of Georgia, 2003 M.A., Political Science, University of New Mexico, 2006 DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Political Science The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico December, 2013 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am grateful for all the love and assistance that I have received during the completion of this dissertation. The support of advisers, friends, family, and colleagues has made this dissertation possible, and I gladly give thanks. First, I would like to extend deep gratitude to my advisers, Kathryn Hochstetler and William Stanley. Their wisdom, patience, and encouragement have supported me in this effort, and without them, this project would not have been completed. In addition, Benjamin Goldfrank and Wendy Hansen provided assistance and insight as members of my committee, and they have given expert feedback along the way. Second, I would like to thank the Department of Political Science at the University of New Mexico for their support over the years. In particular, I thank Joann Buehler, Shoshana Handel, and Beth Leahy for their assistance. Third, I thank the University of New Mexico Latin American and Iberian Institute and the Fulbright U.S. Student Program for their financial support of this research. Finally, I appreciate my family and friends who have supported me throughout this process. My parents and brother have encouraged my efforts, even during the hardest times. Over the course of this dissertation, I have built friendships that cross continents. I deeply appreciate the friendship of Michele Leiby, Lisa Bryant, and Phil Hultquist, who made graduate school bearable. Michelle Cox and Adia Gatewood have provided unwavering support, and I would be lost without them. iii INVESTIGATING THE CAUSES OF REPEATED PRESIDENTIAL FAILURE IN SOUTH AMERICA By Margaret E. Edwards B.A., Political Science and History, University of Georgia, 2003 M.A., Political Science, University of New Mexico, 2006 Ph.D., Political Science, University of New Mexico, 2013 ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the issue of presidential failure – any instance in which a president fails to complete his/her term in office without a break in the democratic regime. South America stands as an anomaly for having faced an uncommonly high rate of presidential failure, as eleven elected presidents have failed to complete their terms in office since the third wave of democratization. This phenomenon presents an interesting puzzle for scholars because it allows for inquiries into governmental stability as well as executive accountability. I evaluate the causes of presidential failure in South America through a multi-method approach that looks at the phenomenon from three different levels of analysis. First, I examine the cross-national trends that explain why presidents are removed from office in South America. Various scholars have analyzed the reasons that presidents fail in Latin America. This assessment builds on those past arguments in order to perform a comprehensive analysis of South American presidential failure. I focus on variables that have not consistently been utilized in the past. More than that, this analysis uses a new technique, survival modeling, to identify those factors that increase or decrease the likelihood that a president will complete his or her term in office. Through this analysis, I identify the importance of minority legislative support, inflation, prolonged recession, executive wrongdoing, and protest in increasing the likelihood that a president will fall. Second, I perform two national assessments of repeated presidential failure. The cross-national statistical analysis shows that certain factors put presidents at risk. The qualitative analyses of Argentina and Ecuador, two countries with repeated failure, allow for process-tracing in order to identify how presidents are removed. I draw from the importance of protest and legislative opposition, which are found significant in the survival model, to explain presidential failure in these two countries. I show that political actors with poder de convocatoria (power to convoke/rallying power) can use that power iv to challenge a president when he/she faces other performance-related issues, like scandal or economic problems. The study of Argentina highlights how the Peronist Party maintains this power through a variety of connections to its organized base. This relationship to base support changes over time and is visible in each instance of presidential failure. On the other hand, Ecuador demonstrates the importance of the indigenous movement in explaining mobilization against presidents. The Argentine story shows how presidential failure flows from an actor with power, a top-down process. Ecuadorian presidential failure shows the bottom-up path of failure that occurs when actors who have lacked traditional access to politics oppose presidents. Third, I analyze survey responses from Argentine and Ecuadorian citizens in order to identify why individuals in these countries choose to protest. I assess what demographic, organizational, and attitudinal factors influence the likelihood of failure. As protest is instrumental to the process of failure, this final assessment demonstrates the importance of civil society organizations and unions in pushing individuals into the street, supporting the findings of the previous two sections. Thus, the causal mechanisms of failure can be witnessed at cross-national, national, and individual levels of analysis. In conclusion, I discuss the important implications of this research for Latin American politics. I provide predictions for the future of presidential stability in the region, and I assess how recent protests differ from those of the past. v Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction…………………………………………………………………1 Chapter 2: Unifying Models of Presidential Failure…………………………………30 Chapter 3: Un Tropezón No Es Caída – A Stumble is not a Fall….…………………55 Chapter 4: Ecuadorian Presidential Instability………………………………………92 Chapter 5: Individual Determinants of Protest Participation…….…….………….117 Chapter 6: Conclusion……………..……………………………………….…………143 References………………….……………………………………….…………….……156 Appendix………………….…………………………………………………..………..164 vi CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION Democratization and democratic stability are perennial issues in the study of Latin American governance. The rise of military dictatorships in the 1960’s and 1970’s in the region provided a central topic for political science inquiry. Military dictatorships emerged in many countries, including Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Paraguay, and Uruguay, marking a period of conflict and undemocratic governance. The horrors of these regimes, matched with a global call for democracy, created a pressing need for solutions to regime instability. At the heart of this was an effort to prevent authoritarian tendencies, increase democratic stability, and improve the lives of citizens in South America. These dictatorships eventually fell in the late 1970’s and early 1980’s, and the rise of newly democratic regimes, the so-called third wave of democratization, brought hope of more positive outcomes. With democracy, the horrors of the past hopefully would not be repeated. These transitions to democracy may have occurred across the region, but different governing issues have emerged for the new democracies. Instead of facing the previous dread of persistent military coups and democratic breakdown, Latin American countries have begun to experience a new type of presidential instability – presidential failure. This issue of presidential failure emerged over the past few decades, as various presidents from different countries failed to complete their terms in office. These examples of failure cross the continent. For instance, Ecuadorian President Abdalá Bucaram faced political pressure from the legislature and mass protests from citizens in 1997. The Ecuadorian Congress eventually charged him with mental incapacity, and he 1 was removed from office following a majority vote in the legislature (Pérez-Liñán, 2007). In the Southern Cone, Argentina faced similar issues in 2001 when President Fernando de la Rúa resigned amid large-scale civil protest and financial crisis. Protesters dramatically chanted “Que se vayan todos,” as they called for all politicians to step down