DOCSLIB.ORG

Mopani District Municipality

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mopani District Municipality MOPANI DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY REVIEWED INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2006 - 2011 ______________________________________________________________ “To be the Food Basket of Southern Africa and the Tourism Destination of Choice” 1 TABLE OF CONTENT Pages EXECUTIVE MAYOR‟S FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................................ 7 MOPANI DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY STRATEGIC INTENT ........................................................................................................... 8 MISSION ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 9 1. PREPARATORY PHASE .............................................................................................................................................. 11 1.1 LEGISLATIVE BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................. 11 1.2. FRAMING THE 2008/09 – 2011 IDP ...................................................................................................................................... 12 1.2.1. The National Planning Context .................................................................................................................12 1.2.2 The Provincial Planning Context ................................................................................................................12 1.2.3. The Local Planning Context .....................................................................................................................13 1.3. BASIS FOR IDP REVIEW PROCESS.................................................................................................................................... 14 1.4 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS TO DRIVE THE IDP PROCESS ................................................................................. 14 1.5 PROCESS OVERVIEW: STEPS AND EVENTS .................................................................................................................... 15 TABLE 1: 2008/9 IDP REVIEW ACTIVITIES ................................................................................................................................. 16 1.6 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ..................................................................................................................................................... 16 1.6.1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WORKERS ...............................................................................................17 1.7 INTER-GOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS ............................................................................................................................... 17 2. DEVELOPMENTAL ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................................ 18 2.1. BACKGROUND..................................................................................................................................................................... 19 2.2. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION AND KEY FEATURES .............................................................................................................. 19 2.3. DEMOGRAPHICS ................................................................................................................................................................. 20 2.3.1. Population Characteristics .................................................................................................................21 2.3.2 Age and Gender Distribution .....................................................................................................................22 2.3.2. Age and Gender Distribution ....................................................................................................................22 2.3.3. People with disabilities in the district .........................................................................................................23 2.3.4. Level of Education ............................................................................................................................24 2.3.5. Employment ...........................................................................................................................................25 2.3.6. Income Categories ..................................................................................................................................25 2.4. SPATIAL ANALYSIS............................................................................................................................................................. 26 2.4.1. Background ............................................................................................................................................26 DESCRIPTION OF THE MUNICIPAL AREA .......................................................................................................26 Greater Tzaneen .............................................................................................................................................26 Greater Letaba ................................................................................................................................................27 Greater Giyani .................................................................................................................................................28 Ba- Phalaborwa ...............................................................................................................................................28 Maruleng.........................................................................................................................................................28 2.4.2. SETTLEMENT PATTERNS IN THE DISTRICT ..........................................................................................29 2.4.3. LAND CLAIMS AND THEIR SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS ...............................................................30 2.4. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................................................ 31 2.5.1. Background ............................................................................................................................................31 2.5.2. A Broad Economic Overview of South Africa .............................................................................................31 2.5.3. Locating the Mopani District Economy within the Provincial Economy ..........................................................32 2.5.4. Economic Sector Analysis .......................................................................................................................32 2.5.5. Constraints in the District Economy ..........................................................................................................34 Greater Giyani .................................................................................................................................................34 Greater Letaba ................................................................................................................................................34 Greater Tzaneen .............................................................................................................................................34 Ba-Phalaborwa ................................................................................................................................................35 Maruleng.........................................................................................................................................................35 2.5.6. Opportunities in the District Economy .......................................................................................................35 2 Greater Giyani .................................................................................................................................................35 Greater Letaba ................................................................................................................................................35 Greater Tzaneen .............................................................................................................................................35 Ba-Phalaborwa ................................................................................................................................................36 Maruleng.........................................................................................................................................................36 2.6. INFRASTRUCTURE ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................................... 36 2.6.1. BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................................36 WATER ..........................................................................................................................................................36 SANITATION ...................................................................................................................................................37 ENERGY AND ELECTRICITY...........................................................................................................................38
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rabies Vaccinations May 2018
    MOPANI DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY PRIVATE BAG 9867 GIYANI 0826 (015) 811 6300 ________________________________________________________________ MEDIA ADVISORY For Immediate Release TO: All Media DATE: 9 May 2018 SUBJECT: FREE RABIES VACCINATION IN TZANEEN AND THE SURROUNDING FARMS The Mopani District Municipality Disaster Management Centre would like to urge residents of the of the Tzaneen, Politsi, George’s Valley, Westfalia, Magoebaskloof, Haenertsburg, Agatha and Lushof areas to bring their dogs & cats for the annual inoculation against Rabies. Free vaccinations of dogs and cats will be offered by the office of the Tzaneen State Vet at various points from 08:30 till 17:30, from Monday 14 May 2018 to Friday 18 May 2018. All residents of the area are urged to utilise the opportunity to prevent any spread of the disease. Vaccination points: Date Point 1 Point 2 Point 3 Point 4 14/05/2018 Tzaneen Tzaneen OK Mini Market Tzaneen Dam Jetty 3 State Vet Showgrounds (Sugar Loaf) Office, No 20 A Peace Street 15/05/2018 Tzaneen Mashutti Farm Basani Packers State Vet A&B 18 Office, No 20 A Peace Street 16/05/2018 Tzaneen Lushof Zabana Farm State Vet Office, No 20 A Peace Street 17/05/2018 Tzaneen George’s Valley Politsi Modjadjiskloof: State Vet (Grysappel Store/Westfalia Caravan Park, Office, No 20 Store & School) Modjadjiskloof A Peace Hospital & Makgoba Street Village 18/05/2018 Tzaneen Haenertzburg Pot ‘n Plow Wegraakbosch Farms State Vet Post Office Office, No 20 A Peace Street Rabies is a fatal viral disease which can affect all mammals, including humans. In South Africa, the disease is endemic and is primarily carried by dogs and jackals in the northern & eastern areas of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 CHAPTER 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction
    1 CHAPTER 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction People and things are given names for identification purposes. A name is a title given to a person or a thing. A name is defined by Sebashe (2003:12) as a word or words by which a person, animal, place or a thing is spoken of or referred to. In other words, a name distinguishes a particular thing from others. Names have political, social, economic and religious significance. As far as this study is concerned, the emphasis would be on the political significance of a name. The Black South Africans suffered a significant harm during the apartheid regime. The Europeans dominated in everything which resulted in Blacks losing their identity, culture, values, heritage an tradition. The European domination interfered with the naming patterns of the indigenous people of South Africa. Names of places were virtually Eurocentric. This is evident in town names, for example, Johannesburg, Pretoria, Pietersburg and Potgietersrus. Tables turned when a democratic government was elected in 1994. The affected people started to realize the negative impact of apartheid on numerous things, places names inclusive. The new government started to implement political changes. Some place names are changed to strike a balance between races, new places are named according to what the people want. Place naming starts to shift a distance away from Eurocentric to African names. Towns, streets, sporting facilities, names of settlements, businesses and 2 educational institutions are the most places affected by name changes and new naming patterns. 1.2 Background to the problem The problem of place naming in Africa in general and South Africa in particular started during the colonial period when many European countries scrambled for Africa in the 17th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Potentially Harmful Trace Elements (Phtes) in the Groundwater of Greater Giyani, Limpopo Province, South Africa: Possible Health Implications
    COPYRIGHT AND CITATION CONSIDERATIONS FOR THIS THESIS/ DISSERTATION o Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. o NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. o ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. How to cite this thesis Surname, Initial(s). (2012) Title of the thesis or dissertation. PhD. (Chemistry)/ M.Sc. (Physics)/ M.A. (Philosophy)/M.Com. (Finance) etc. [Unpublished]: University of Johannesburg. Retrieved from: https://ujdigispace.uj.ac.za (Accessed: Date). Potentially Harmful Trace Elements (PHTEs) in the groundwater of Greater Giyani, Limpopo Province, South Africa: possible health implications By LIVHUWANI PORTIA MUNYANGANE A dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master in Geology (MSc Geology) in Medical Geology Department of Geology Faculty of Science UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG Supervisor: Prof. Hassina Mouri Co-Supervisor: Prof. Jan Kramers 2015 ABSTRACT Most rural communities in developing countries rely on borehole water as their only source of water. Since borehole water comes from underground, it is often considered pure and clean, but this is frequently not the case. Groundwater contains certain amounts of trace elements that may become deleterious to human health. The objectives of this investigation were to assess the concentration levels of Potential Harmful Trace Elements (PHTEs) and their spatial distribution patterns in borehole water in the Greater Giyani area of Limpopo, South Africa, and the potential human health risks associated with this.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Giyani Municipality. Integrated Development Plan 2021/22 DRAFT
    “A Municipality where environmental sustainability, tourism and agriculture thrive for economic growth” Greater Giyani Municipality. Integrated Development Plan 2021/22 DRAFT Page | 1 Table of Contents. CONTENT PAGE NO. Mayor’s Foreword 6-7 Municipal Manager’s Foreword 8-9 Executive Summary 9-11 IDP Process plan 12-15 1. ANALYSIS PHASE 16 1.1. Introduction and Overview 16 1.1.1. Introduction 16 1.1.2. Overview 16 1.1.3 Total Population 17 1.1.4 Population per Gender and Age 18 1.1.5 Level of Education 19 1.1.6 Employment Profile 20 1.1.7 Household Income 20 1.2 Analysis of Key Performance Areas 21 1.2.1 KPA1: Spatial Rational 21 1.2.1.1 Purpose of Spatial Analysis and Overview 22 1.2.1.2 Settlements Patterns 22 1.2.1.3 Hierarchy of Settlements 23 1.2.1.4 Land Claims and their socio-economic implication 23 1.2.1.5 Land Reform 23 1.2.1.6 Illegal Land occupation and Informal Settlements 24 1.2.1.7 SDF and LUMS 24 1.2.1.7.1 Review of LUMS 25 1.2.1.8. Strategic Land for Development 26 1.2.1.8.1. Strategic Land for residential development 26 1.2.1.8.2. Private/Tribal Authority Land for Development 26 1.2.1.8.3. Government land Suitable for development 26 1.2.1.8.4 Ideal land for industrial development 27 1.2.1.8 The Environmental analysis 28 1.2.1.9 Challenges on Spatial Rational 31 1.2.2 KPA 2: Institutional Development and 32 Transformation 1.2.2.1 Political Structures 32 1.2.2.2 Portfolio Committees 32 1.2.2.3 MPAC and its Functionality 33 1.2.2.4 Administrative Structures 34-35 1.2.2.5 Mandate, Powers and Functions 36-38 1.2.2.6 Employment
    [Show full text]
  • 20 (Section B) Limpopo Province
    Section B: NationalProfile Limpopo and District Province Profiles 20 Limpopo Province Mopani District Municipality (DC33) Mopani is located in the north-eastern quadrant of Limpopo Province and comprises five health sub-districts: Ba- Phalaborwa, Greater Giyani, Greater Letaba, Greater Tzaneen and Maruleng. It has a population of 1 138 063, with a population density of 56.9 persons per km2 and falls in socio-economic Quintile 2. Estimated medical scheme coverage is 6.7%. Social determinants of healtha Population per selected category Unemployment ratea 39.4% Population category 2017 2018 2019 2020 Youth unemployment rate (15-34 years)a 51.4% under 1 year 27 962 27 875 27 195 26 012 No schooling 17.1% under 5 years 137 287 137 200 135 841 133 506 Matric 24.8% 05-09 years 128 595 130 142 131 931 133 933 Higher education 8.1% 10-14 years 119 168 121 295 123 342 125 104 Households 338 427 15-19 years 113 626 111 946 111 872 113 308 Female-headed households 49.2% 20-24 years 122 592 118 219 113 340 108 806 Formal dwellings 90.7% 25-29 years 124 009 124 059 123 035 120 664 Flush toilet connected to sewerage 14.1% 30-34 years 99 610 105 531 111 694 117 599 Weekly refuse removal 15.6% 35-39 years 81 012 83 494 85 532 87 295 Piped water inside dwellings 12.8% 40-44 years 63 687 66 218 68 904 71 636 Electricity for lighting 94.5% 45-49 years 51 503 52 907 54 444 56 182 Blue Drop water score 62.0% 50-54 years 42 753 43 816 44 867 45 919 55-59 years 35 655 36 304 37 086 37 936 Source: StatsSA.
    [Show full text]
  • Households' Adaptation to Climate Change Hazards in Semi-Arid
    Chapter Households’ Adaptation to Climate Change Hazards in Semi-Arid Region of Mopani, South Africa Musa Yusuf Jimoh, Peter Bikam, Hector Chikoore, James Chakwizira and Emaculate Ingwani Abstract New climate change realities are no longer a doubtful phenomenon, but realities to adapt and live with. Its cogent impacts and implications’ dispositions pervade all sectors and geographic scales, making no sector or geographic area immune, nor any human endeavor spared from the associated adversities. The consequences of this emerging climate order are already manifesting, with narratives written beyond the alterations in temperature and precipitation, particularly in urban areas of semi-arid region of South Africa. The need to better understand and respond to the new climate change realities is particularly acute in this region. Thus, this chapter highlights the concept of adaptation as a fundamental component of managing cli- mate change vulnerability, through identifying and providing insight in respect of some available climate change adaptation models and how these models fit within the premises and programmes of sustainable adaptation in semi-arid region with gaps identification. The efforts of governments within the global context are exam- ined with households’ individual adaptation strategies to climate change hazards in Mopani District. The factors hindering the success of sustainable urban climate change adaptation strategic framework and urban households’ adaptive systems are also subjects of debate and constitute the concluding remarks to the chapter. Keywords: households, adaptation, climate change, semi-arid, South Africa 1. Introduction Adaptation to climate change hazard is attracting growing international atten- tion as confidence in forecasts for climate change is rising [1].
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Socioeconomic Factors on Households' Vulnerability to Climate Change in Semiarid Towns of Mopani, South Afric
    climate Article The Influence of Socioeconomic Factors on Households’ Vulnerability to Climate Change in Semiarid Towns of Mopani, South Africa Musa Yusuf Jimoh 1,2,*, Peter Bikam 1 and Hector Chikoore 3 1 Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Venda, Thohoyandou, Limpopo 0950, South Africa; [email protected] 2 Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Ilorin, Ilorin 240003, Nigeria 3 Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Vanderbijlpark 1900, South Africa; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +27-68-072-631 or +234-818-871-9036 Abstract: The changing climate and its current rate, frequency, as well as its life-threatening impacts are undoubtedly abnormal and globally worrisome. Its effects are expected to be severely differ- ent across segments of the society. It is disposed to leaving no facet of human endeavor immune, particularly in vulnerable cities of developing countries where there is dearth of empirical studies. For the context-specific nature of climate change impacts and place-based character of vulnerability, this study explores the influence of socioeconomic attributes on household vulnerability in Mopani District northeast of South Africa to provide basis for targeting, formulating, evaluating, and moni- toring adaptation policies, programs, and projects. The study adopted a multistage random sampling to draw 500 households from six towns in Mopani District, Limpopo Province. Mixed methods approach was used for data collection, while Household Vulnerability Index (HVI) was estimated using principal component analysis and regressed with socioeconomic attributes. The study reveals that climate is changing with high HVI across selected towns.
    [Show full text]
  • Phalaborwa Main Seat of Ba-Phalaborwa Magisterial District
    # # !C # # ### !C^# #!.C# # !C # # # # # # # # # ^!C# # # # # # # # ^ # ^ # !C # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # !C # # # # # # ## # #!C # # # # # # #!C# # # # !C# ^ ## # # # # # # # ^ # # # # # #!C # # # #!C^ # # # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # !C ## # #!C # # !C# # # # # # #^ # # # # # # # # # # # #!C# # # # # ## # # # # # # # ##!C # ## # # # # ## # # # ## # # # ## # # # !C # # # # # # # # # !C## # #!C # # ## # # # # # ## # # !C# !C# # #^ # # # # # ### # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # #!C !C #!C# # # # # #^# # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # ## # # !C# ^ ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ### # ## # ## # # # !C # # #!C # # #!C # ## !C## ## # # # # !C# # # # # ## # # # # # # ## # # # # # ## # # ## ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #!C # ## ## # # # # # # # # # ## # # ^!C # # # # # # ^ # # # # ## # # ## ## # # # # # # #!C # # # # !C # # !C ## # !C## # #!C # # # # # # # # ## # ## # # !C# # # ## # # ## # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ### !C### # # # # !C !C# # # # # !C# # # # # # #!C ## !C# # !.# # # # # # # # # ## ## # #!C # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # ## ## ##^ ## # # # # ^ # !C ## # # ## # # # # # !C## # # ## # # # # # # ## # # # # # ### # # # #!C### !C# # !C# # # # # # !C ### # # # !C##!C# # # # ^ !C # ## # !C# ^ !C # # # #!C # ## ## ## # # ## # # # # # # ## !C# # # # # # #!C # ## # ## ## # # # # # !C # # ^ # ## ## ## # # # # !.!C### ### # # # # # # !C # # # !C # ##!C# # # # # # # ### # ### # ## ## # # # # #!C ## # ## ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # ## PPhhaallaabboorrwwaa
    [Show full text]
  • Agri-Hubs Identified by Limpopo
    ONE PAGER EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES – AGRI-HUBS as on 6 November 2015 Agri-Hubs Identified by the Province LIMPOPO PROVINCE 27 PRIORITY DISTRICTS PROVINCE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY PROPOSED AGRI-HUB Limpopo Vhembe Nwanedi Mopani Tzaneen Sekhukhune Groblersdal Capricorn Ga-Poopedi Waterberg Modimolle 1 Capricorn District Municipality Proposed Agri-Hub Location :Ga-Poopedi District Context Demographics The district is situated at the core of economic development in The district has 1 1261 463 people and the total number of households the Limpopo Province and includes the capital of the province, the is 342838 with an average household size of 3.7 (Census 2011). City of Polokwane. Total Area: 21 705km². Capricorn District 59.9% of the population is within the 15 to 64 year age group. Municipality falls under the Limpopo province, located on the northern Unemployment rate is at 37.2% with 49.9% of all households that are side of South Africa. It derives its name from the Tropic of Capricorn, female headed. According to Census 2011, half of the population along which it is situated. It is predominantly rural in nature. It of the CDM resides in the Polokwane Municipality, followed by consists of the following five local municipalities: Aganang, Blouberg, Lepelle-Nkumpi, Blouberg and Aganang with 18%, 13% and 10% Lepelle-Nkumpi, Molemole and Polokwane. Limpopo's capital, respectively, while Molemole Local Municipality accounts for 9% Polokwane (previously Pietersburg), lies in the heart of the Capricorn of the population of the district. Although the population of the region. The district has an internal airport, and is linked to Gauteng by district is growing, the rate of growth is declining.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Impact Assessment
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED VENBECK PHALABORWA FILLING STATION LIMPOPO PROVINCE Client: Tekplan Environmental Client info: Anton von Well E – mail: [email protected] HCAC - Heritage Consultants Private Bag X 1049 Report Author: Suite 34 Mr. J. van der Walt Modimolle Project Reference: 0510 217013 Tel: 082 373 8491 Report date: Fax: 086 691 6461 January 2017 E-Mail: [email protected] Archaeological Impact Assessment – Venbeck Phalaborwa Filling Station January 2017 DOCUMENT PROGRESS Archaeological Impact Assessment Document status Document v1.0 Version Report Purpose Draft Report for review Report Ref. No. 217013 Distribution List Report Date Reference Document Distribution Number of Copies number 2017/01/23 217013 Tekplan Environmental Electronic copy HCAC Archaeological Impact Assessment – Venbeck Phalaborwa Filling Station January 2017 General The possibility of unmarked or informal graves and subsurface finds cannot be excluded. If any possible finds are made during construction, the operations must be stopped and a qualified archaeologist contacted for an assessment of the find/s. Disclaimer: Although all possible care is taken to identify sites of cultural importance during the investigation of study areas, it is always possible that hidden or sub-surface sites could be overlooked during the study. Heritage Contracts and Archaeological Consulting CC and its personnel will not be held liable for such oversights or for costs incurred as a result of such oversights. Copyright: Copyright in all documents, drawings and records whether manually or electronically produced, which form part of the submission and any subsequent report or project document shall vest in Heritage Contracts and Archaeological Consulting CC. None of the documents, drawings or records may be used or applied in any manner, nor may they be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means whatsoever for or to any other person, without the prior written consent of Heritage Contracts and Archaeological Consulting CC.
    [Show full text]
  • Experiencing Development: Corporeal Tensions And
    EXPERIENCING DEVELOPMENT: CORPOREAL TENSIONS AND GRASSROOTS ACTIVISM IN SOUTH AFRICA’S LIMPOPO PROVINCE A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Marcus DuBois Watson May 2009 © 2009 Marcus DuBois Watson EXPERIENCING DEVELOPMENT: CORPOREAL TENSIONS AND GRASSROOTS ACTIVISM IN SOUTH AFRICA’S LIMPOPO PROVINCE Marcus DuBois Watson, Ph.D. Cornell University 2009 The Anthropology of Development has studied international aid from numerous perspectives, e.g. development as discourse, transnational processes, and NGO intervention. My dissertation extends the analytic reach of the Anthropology of Development, and will benefit development practice, by focusing on interpersonal dimensions of development practice. Based in Tsonga- and Pedi-speaking areas of South Africa, my case studies include an evangelical church established by an Afrikaner missionary from Cape Town for the purpose of spiritual enlightenment, an HIV-AIDS awareness NGO run by a nun from Ireland, and a school-based project facilitated by a U.S. Peace Corps volunteer (PCV) designed to improve local teaching methods. Collecting information on interpersonal relations between the activists and villagers involved spending time in work spaces and, where applicable, host family settings. My interlocuters and I described interactions, noting corporeal evidence of comforts and discomforts. Following perceptions of grief and relief to conscious statements and social
    [Show full text]
  • Limpopo Proposed Main Seat / Sub District Within the Proposed
    !C !C^ !.!C !C ^!C ^ ^ !C !C !C!C !C !C !C ^ ^ !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C ^ !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !. !C ^ ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !. !C !C !C !C ^ !C ^ !C ^ !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ ^ !C !C !C !. !C GGaa--KKggaappaannee MMaaiinn SSeeaatt ooff LLeettaabbaa MMaaggiisstteerriiaall DDiissttrriicctt ^!C ^ !C !C !C ^ LouisT richardMt ainS eat ^ JOHNOLLY Mulima KLEINFONTEIN SETALI GOEDE Muwaw!Ceni AANGENAAM KOEDOESFONTEIN ZEERMOOI Makhado NU !COlifantshoek PLAISERFONTEIN NOBLE Phikela KREMETART 128 123 UITZICHT SCHAAPLAAGTE Tiva Ta Bode R578 231 KLEIN 411 Makhado NU HOOP 113 110 Khwarha OLIFANTSHOEK 103 HOEK Maxabela KaDizingidzingi ST 114 108 Wana KEMP Tshitale 120 Mayona 106 56 KaDizingidzingi 409 Donkerhoek SETALI GOEDVERWACHT Kolobetona Witkoppies MOOIMEISJESFONTEIN Muhlahlandlela Giyani PAARDEKRAAL Iketleng Mallamullelle Naledi NDENGEZA $ Basani Zone 2 OVERSCHOT 122 121 BlalalaZonke 141 Tshitale Slenger Phooko B 2 a Tshitale 135 Naledi b 408 S a Sub Ndzaku Ka t Rivala o Kwatane B 1 Makhado NU e Magiisteriiall Mokgegolo New e Main Seat MULIMA Ntshava L k - e l Ghandlanani t Se Ntatele Stand MATIKO se SETALI GaPhooko e Greater ^!C Tiyani d 898 FARM RIETVLEI d MSENGI Raphahlelo STERKWATER i District 131 Diistriict HARTEBEESTFONTEIN Giyani NU 664 KaNgove Thembisa Mulima 130 139 140 M Makgakgapatse 898 STUKFONTEIN Muumoni Makwidibung Mahembeni Dingamanzi KLAARSTROOM
    [Show full text]