Great Battles of the Great War
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
East Prussia ‘14
Designer Notes: East Prussia ‘14 In the middle of August 1914, the world's attention was focused directly on the Western Front where German armies were sweeping into Belgium and France. On the Eastern Front however, the Russians were on the offensive into East Prussia, an important agricultural region of the Prussian homeland, and the gateway to Berlin. The Russians planned a two pronged invasion into East Prussia: one army approaching from the Niemen River to the east and one army approaching from the Narew River to the south, both aimed at outflanking German forces located therein, and the eventual capture of the strategic city of Königsberg. In their way stood a single German army, two resolute commanders, and a well developed rail network. By the time the campaign was over both Russian armies would be almost completely destroyed and thrown out of East Prussia and the campaign itself would go on to become one of the most studied and celebrated victories in warfare. Table of Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 5 The Belligerents ................................................................................................................. 7 The German Army .......................................................................................................... 7 Summary of Capabilities............................................................................................. 7 Organization ............................................................................................................... -
№3 (30) 2014 №4 (31) 2014
№4 (31) 2014 №3 (30) 2014 strategy september`14 | 04 | new defence order Strategy 1 стратегии содержание ООО «Дифанс МеДиа» 4 Мосин: отец трехлинейки 32 Новости 60 First airfields of saint petersburg – First airfields 6 Sergei mosin: Father 33 Комплекс «Шатер» в составе Генеральный директор of russia of the «three-Line rifle» сторожевого охранения Александра Григоренко 8 Винтовки и люди мобильных объектов 65 Зао «ЭЛси» – научно- [email protected] производственное 13 Guns and people 33 «shater» system as part исполнительный директор of security Outposts for предприятие 16 Высокие технологии: Инна Петрова mobile Objects В небе индии, Китая попасть в цель, уйти 66 [email protected] из-под удара 34 News и анголы Главный редактор Виктор Николаев 19 High technology: 35 Новые электронные 68 In the sky of India, China [email protected] Hit the target and evade компоненты на рынке and angola the response ВПК рФ 70 Авиакосмические арт-директор Николай Федотов 20 ОАО нПК «северная заря». 35 New electronic Components технологии в татарстане. Дизайнер 40 лет, сохраняя прошлое, in the market of military- аКто Евгений Казаков создает настоящее и Industrial Complex 72 Служба радиосвязи Менеджеры будущее релейной техники of the russian Federation российского флота 36 День инноваций Ирина Ульяшина 23 «оборонэкспо-2014» 77 Russian Navy radio [email protected], и форум «технологии Минобороны рФ Communication service Людмила Воронкова в машиностроении» 38 Инновационное 81 Спецсвязь: из рук в руки [email protected], 24 Современная мировая предприятие: официальное 81 Special-purpose Галина Шедакова военно-морская техника признание Communication: from Hand [email protected] 41 Innovative enterprise: 27 Modern World Naval to Hand Official recognition equipment ООО «Дифанс Медиа» 82 Международная научно- 29 «Композит-Проф»: 44 Основа научно-технического Санкт-Петербург, развития практическая конференция инжиниринг и производство МВд россии «сПеЦ- Средний пр. -
Debating Cannae: Delbrück, Schlieffen, and the Great War Andrew Loren Jones East Tennessee State University
East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2014 Debating Cannae: Delbrück, Schlieffen, and the Great War Andrew Loren Jones East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the European History Commons, and the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Jones, Andrew Loren, "Debating Cannae: Delbrück, Schlieffen, and the Great War" (2014). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2387. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/2387 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Debating Cannae: Delbrück, Schlieffen, and the Great War ___________________________________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History East Tennessee State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in History ________________________________________ by Andrew L. Jones May 2014 ________________________________________ Dr. Stephen G. Fritz, Chair Dr. Dinah Mayo-Bobee Dr. John M. Rankin Keywords: Nationalism, Delbrück, Schlieffen, German War Planning, Germany, Sedan, Moltke, War Enthusiasm, German Wars of Unification, World War I ABSTRACT Debating Cannae: Delbrück, Schlieffen, and the Great War by Andrew L. Jones Debating Cannae: Delbrück, Schlieffen, and the Great War provides the reader a view of the historical struggle between Alfred von Schlieffen and Hans Delbrück. They argued fiercely about the foundation of the German Empire and the use of history. -
World War I in the History and Culture of Russia and Europe
WORLD WAR I IN THE HISTORY AND CULTURE OF RUSSIA AND EUROPE Programme International Conference 25—26 October, 2013 Kaliningrad / Gusev 24 October, 2013 ACCOMMODATION OF PARTICIPANTS IN HOTELS “TOURIST”, “KALININGRAD”, “OLD KOENIGSBERG” 19:00 – 21:00 Cathedral ORGAN CONCERT FOR CONFERENCE PARTICIPANTS Kant Island 25 October, 2013 09:30 – 10:00 CONFERENCE OPENING CEREMONY Conference Hall IKBFU PROF. ANDREY P. KLEMESHEV 2 Universitetskaya STR. Rector, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University WELCOMING SPEECHES NIKOLAY N. TSUKANOV GOVERNOR OF THE KALININGRAD REGION STANISLAV S. VOSKRESENSKIY Deputy Presidential Plenipotentiary Envoy to the Northwestern Federal District of the Russian Federation PANEL DISCUSSION 10:00 – 11:20 10:00 – 10:20 PROF. EUGENY YU. SERGEEV Conference Hall Chief Researcher, Institute of World History RAS (Moscow), President of the IKBFU WWI Historical Association 2 Universitetskaya STR. Challenges and Perspectives of WWI Studies Simultaneous Interpreting 10:20 – 10:40 PROF. VIKTOR V. SERGEEV Head of the Department of History, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University (Kaliningrad) Debating Points of the WWI History: Historiographical Aspect 10:40 – 11:00 ZORAN STOJKOVIĆ Defense Attaché of the Republic of Serbia in the Russian Federation, colonel Serbia in the World War I 11:00 – 11:20 PROF. MICHAŁ GLOСK Nicolaus Copernicus University (Torun, Poland) World War I in Polish Historiography 11:20 – 11:40 COFFEE-BREAK PANEL DISCUSSION 11:40 – 12:50 11:40 – 12:00 DR. DENIS YU. KOZLOV Conference Hall Deputy Head of the Research Institute of War History, Military Academy of the IKBFU General Staff of Russian Armed Forces (Moscow) 2 Universitetskaya STR. Baltic Battles in 1914: Plans and Reality Simultaneous Interpreting 12:00 – 12:20 PROF. -
V^Ciocc1, Primarily O.. J Trrnalation Of) 1 R;Jt.^Rb^I>G-- Viic Cc
hi.. ":Ui('-(t> >it! •/..'/><* ttirhyft-.rti.r. ,V./iV /../.. '.i,iuith-ir»rh ti>i it iktfu a././ <r V^ciocc1, primarily o.. J trrnalation of) 1 r;jT.^rB^i>G-- viic cc '.-virkllch v;ar,by / imade bj auf.h:r uf hhie article. ; .• . ... _ , , . , , . , , , , , t . , '.,;",•;,••'• •; ' . •' •<. ' '.' ' 7 " ! r " '• " ' ' "';/ ...... ,, ./ i ii ,V I it i l! II >t •< . •ili'iii I i ii I, „ „ .. II . •-. >.i) II ;. .. .i >t it H it li it ,f)i u ,i Hi, il-ul CODE; tflWBER , IR—1933 I N D IV ID U A ij *RES EAR OH STUDY A CRITICAL AKALY8I& OP TtiE BATTLE OP TANNENBERO •••i; " . • : , (baaed primarily on a translation of nTANNENEERQ--wie es wirklieh war11 General Max Hoffmann) Submitted by \ THIS SOLUTICM MtiST BS RiSTURf^ED FOR FILE BY 5:00 >!W,, OUTHE DATS SKOSN •PLEABB PLACE Y'jUR NAME ON COVZR PACE HiE WRNI1W. FOR FU.E LBUT DO NOV PLACE VGUK 1 0» SOLUTION IWEif WRESTING A RDVIEff. The Command and General Staff School .'.}••• Leavenworth'' , •Kansa ' s Fort Leftv>nworth, Kansas, May IB; 1933 MEMORANDUM FOR: The Director Second Year Class, The Com mand and Oeneral Staff School, Fort Leavehworth, Kansas. A:Crjitioal Anaiysis :o£ the Battle of Tan enberg (based primarily oh•aftranslation of "Tannenberg wie es wirklioh war" by Max Hoffmann) I, PAPERS ACCOMPANYING: 1. A Bibliography for this study. 2. Maps: (1) Strategic Map--East Prussia, Campaign SO $d^&hj6e;J^^ 'Armiejst &) J'JBi^^le'j^of'^^ia%7'-F^a)^enjaii 4) !'$ei^u<iti ioh^'/bif;;.inu81lB'ian r igfifc 'tlank 5) Attack on Russian left, August 26-28, • ' 101^ ' •' ', i JL v J L * ^ ' ', :; • '• J > (6) Attaok on Russian Center, August 26-28, 1914. -
Soldiers, Rabbis, and the Ostjuden Under German Occupation: 1915-1918
University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 8-2010 Shattered Communities: Soldiers, Rabbis, and the Ostjuden under German Occupation: 1915-1918 Tracey Hayes Norrell [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Diplomatic History Commons, European History Commons, History of Religion Commons, Military History Commons, and the Political History Commons Recommended Citation Norrell, Tracey Hayes, "Shattered Communities: Soldiers, Rabbis, and the Ostjuden under German Occupation: 1915-1918. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2010. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/834 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Tracey Hayes Norrell entitled "Shattered Communities: Soldiers, Rabbis, and the Ostjuden under German Occupation: 1915-1918." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in History. Vejas G. Liulevicius, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend -
Illusions of Glory—The Great War on the Eastern Front ADVANCED RULES and PLAY BOOK (Rev
Illusions of Glory—The Great War on the Eastern Front ADVANCED RULES AND PLAY BOOK (Rev. 2/18/2016) (Designer: Perry R. Silverman; Developer: Fred Schachter; Assistant Designer & Developer: Aaron H. Silverman) 18.0 Regions 29.0 Treaty of Brest-Litovsk 18.1 Movement and Regions 30.0 More Than Two Players 18.2 Control of Regions 30.1 Two AP Players 18.3 Combat and Regions 30.2 Two CP Players 18.4 Regions and Terrain 31.0 Introductory Game 18.5 Regions and Retreat 31.1 The 1914 Invasion of Serbia 18.6 Regions and Advance After Combat 32.0 Shorter Game Scenarios 18.7 Regions and Supply 32.1 From Mobilization to Limited War 19.0 Trenches 32.2 The Brusilov Offensive and Beyond 19.1 Building Trenches 33.0 Strategy Guide 19.2 Trench Construction Die Rolls 33.1 Allied Powers Strategy 19.3 Trench Levels 33.2 Central Powers Strategy 19.4 Removing Trench Markers 34.0 Strategy Card Histories and Notes 19.5 Trench Effects on Combat 34.1 Allied Powers Cards 20.0 Forts 34.2 Central Powers Cards 20.1 General Rules 35.0 Acknowledgments 20.2 Destroying a Fort 36.0 Bibliography 20.3 Besieging a Fort 20.4 Surrender of Besieged Forts 20.5 Forts and Supply 21.0 Flank Attacks 21.1 Restrictions on Flank Attacks 21.2 Forts and Flank Attacks 21.3 Pinning Spaces and Flank Attack DRMs 21.4 Resolving Flank Attacks 22.0 Assembling Units 22.1 Only LCUs Can Be Assembled 22.2 Composition of Assembled LCUs 22.3 How to Assemble LCUs 23.0 Rebellions and Revolution 23.1 Mechanics of Rebellion 23.2 Tracking National Will 23.3 Uprising Units 23.4 Russian Revolution 23.5 Collapse -
Königsberg–Kaliningrad, 1928-1948
Exclave: Politics, Ideology, and Everyday Life in Königsberg–Kaliningrad, 1928-1948 By Nicole M. Eaton A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Yuri Slezkine, chair Professor John Connelly Professor Victoria Bonnell Fall 2013 Exclave: Politics, Ideology, and Everyday Life in Königsberg–Kaliningrad, 1928-1948 © 2013 By Nicole M. Eaton 1 Abstract Exclave: Politics, Ideology, and Everyday Life in Königsberg-Kaliningrad, 1928-1948 by Nicole M. Eaton Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Yuri Slezkine, Chair “Exclave: Politics, Ideology, and Everyday Life in Königsberg-Kaliningrad, 1928-1948,” looks at the history of one city in both Hitler’s Germany and Stalin’s Soviet Russia, follow- ing the transformation of Königsberg from an East Prussian city into a Nazi German city, its destruction in the war, and its postwar rebirth as the Soviet Russian city of Kaliningrad. The city is peculiar in the history of Europe as a double exclave, first separated from Germany by the Polish Corridor, later separated from the mainland of Soviet Russia. The dissertation analyzes the ways in which each regime tried to transform the city and its inhabitants, fo- cusing on Nazi and Soviet attempts to reconfigure urban space (the physical and symbolic landscape of the city, its public areas, markets, streets, and buildings); refashion the body (through work, leisure, nutrition, and healthcare); and reconstitute the mind (through vari- ous forms of education and propaganda). Between these two urban revolutions, it tells the story of the violent encounter between them in the spring of 1945: one of the largest offen- sives of the Second World War, one of the greatest civilian exoduses in human history, and one of the most violent encounters between the Soviet army and a civilian population. -
The Russian Army and the Conduct of Operations in 1914
British Journal for Military History, Volume 2, Issue 2, February 2016 The Russian Army and the Conduct of Operations in 1914 STEPHEN WALSH Royal Military Academy Sandhurst Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT The scale of the fighting on the Eastern Front in 1914 is reasonably familiar but the Russian campaign of 1914, apart from Tannenberg, is poorly understood. The Russian Army’s military strategy, the choices it made, what it was trying to achieve, why and how, are not well known. This article will analyse Russian strategy and operations in a thematic rather than narrative manner, placing the Russian conduct of operations in the context of Russian military thinking at the time. It will argue that the relative importance of the East Prussian and Galician Operations has been misunderstood, especially the Russian operations in northern Galicia. In late August 1914, the Russian Army faced strategic catastrophe on the entire Eastern Front, not because of events in East Prussia, but in northern Galicia where the chronic lack of correlation between ends and means in Russian military strategy became acute. The Russian high command’s desire to launch a third operation into eastern Germany, in August 1914, distorted Russian strategy to the point where the Russian Army flirted with catastrophe in northern Galicia, a brush with disaster that rescued Russian strategy from its own illusions, enabling them to defeat the Austrians and force the German Army into a sustained two- front war. ‘The history of the campaign of 1914 is nothing else but the story of the consequences of the strategical errors of the War Plan’1 On 31 July 1914, Tsar Nicholas II authorised the mobilisation of the Russian Army, a defining moment2 in the sequence of events that began the First World War, a war 1 N.N. -
Centenary of the Russian Revolution (1917-2017)
Centenary of the Russian Revolution (1917-2017) Centenary of the Russian Revolution (1917-2017) Edited by Andreu Mayayo i Artal, Alberto Pellegrini and Antoni Segura i Mas Centenary of the Russian Revolution (1917-2017) Edited by Andreu Mayayo i Artal, Alberto Pellegrini and Antoni Segura i Mas This book first published 2018 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2018 by Andreu Mayayo i Artal, Alberto Pellegrini, Antoni Segura i Mas and contributors All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-1407-2 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-1407-2 CONTENTS Foreword ................................................................................................... vii Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 The Revolutions of 1917 in Russia Julián Casanova Chapter One ............................................................................................... 10 Tsarism’s Last Adventure: Russia and the First World War Alberto Pellegrini Chapter Two .............................................................................................. 40 Revolution and Work: From -
Origins of the First World
ORIGINS OF THE SECTION I FIRST WORLD WA R The war of 1914–18 was not known, until later, as included in the glossary of terms at the end of the the First World War. When it happened, it quickly resource guide. became known simply as the “Great War.” The world had seen nothing like it since the wars following the Impact of WWI—The Watershed French Revolution that ended in 1815 and had no Event of the Twentieth Century? reason to expect a war like it when it broke out on In this section of the resource guide, we will begin by August 1, 1914. Many historians consider World War considering a brief overview of the major impacts of I to be the watershed moment of the twentieth cen- the First World War. Following this, we will analyze tury. By the time the war came to a formal end at 11 the origins and the causes of the war. AM on November 11, 1918,1 it had not only devastated Europe, but had also transformed the way states Total Casualties operated. World War I was an event that ushered in monumental changes, destroyed tens of millions of It is difficult to comprehend the cost of World War I lives, brought about the end of the great continental from the vantage point of the United States, which European empires, ushered in new technologies, and suffered “only” 117,000 killed in the war (0.13 per- 2 transformed the global balance of power. cent of the population). For the U.S., World War II was a much greater, i.e., more devastating, war—the The Central Powers included the German Empire U.S. -
Preparing for the War of the Future in the Wake of Defeat: the Evolution of German Strategic Thought, 1919-1935
Journal of Military and Strategic VOLUME 15, ISSUE 3, 2014 Studies Preparing for the War of the Future in the Wake of Defeat: The Evolution of German Strategic Thought, 1919-1935 Mark Shannon Germany’s defeat in the First World War came as a profound shock. While the nation was stunned by the peace settlement that followed, the military was faced with the inescapable reality that their approach to fighting a prolonged industrialized conflict was flawed. The years following Germany's defeat found the army in search of reasons for its failure. The officer corps sought to analyze its experience with “total war” and to draw the correct lessons from it. In this way, the army could prepare for the war of the future, secure in the knowledge that any repetition of the First World War could be avoided. In short, the German armed forces began the detailed process of distilling relevant military lessons from the conflict and applying them to their perception of a future war. While many of the lessons learned and studied had to do with tactics and technology, it is the purpose of this analysis to examine the strategic debate that ensued. Regardless of how strategy would be formulated in the coming years, it maintained at its heart one simple objective that is best summarized in a conversation between General Walther Reinhardt and Colonel Albrecht von Thaer in January 1919. Thaer expressed his pessimism for the coming years but Reinhardt, a liberal officer who was about to assume command of the War Ministry disagreed. He openly stated that “the goal is and remains a free Germany, hopefully restored to its former borders, with [the] ©Centre of Military and Strategic Studies, 2014 ISSN : 1488-559X JOURNAL OF MILITARY AND STRATEGIC STUDIES strongest, most modern army with [the] newest weapons.