DOCSLIB.ORG

Electronic Structure and Bonding in Pyrrolic Macrocycle-Supported Complexes of Actinides

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Electronic Structure and Bonding in Pyrrolic Macrocycle-Supported Complexes of Actinides A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Science and Engineering. 2018 Kieran Thomas Patrick O’Brien School of Chemistry Contents Contents Section Page number List of tables 5 List of figures 9 Abstract 15 Declaration 16 Copyright Statement 17 Publications 18 Abbreviations 19 Acknowledgements 23 Part I. Introduction Chapter 1. Theoretical background and methodology 26 1. Aims and objectives 26 2. Quantum chemistry 27 3. Density functional theory 33 4. Mulliken and Hirshfeld population analysis 37 5. Natural bond orbital analysis 39 6. The quantum theory of atoms in molecules 41 7. Energy decomposition analysis 46 8. Nucleus-independent chemical shifts 46 9. References 48 Chapter 2. Organometallic chemistry of the f-elements 52 1. Background and chemistry of organoactinides 52 2. Computational organometallic chemistry of the f- 56 elements 2.1. DFT and orbital-based partition methods 57 1 Contents 2.2. QTAIM analysis of organometallics of the f-block 62 elements 2.3. Non-partition-based methods – EDA and NICS 63 analysis 3. Recent developments in carbocyclic organoactinide 65 chemistry 3.1. The trans-calix[2]benzene[2]pyrrolide ligand 66 4. References 69 Chapter 3. Methodology 77 1. Model complexes 77 2. Computational methodology 80 3. References 82 Part II. Results and Discussion Chapter 4. Geometry optimisations and electronic 85 structures 1. Geometry optimisations of Th(IV) complexes 86 2. Geometry optimisations of U(III) complexes 91 3. Geometry optimisations of Th(III) complexes 98 4. Partial charge analyses of Th(IV), U(III) and Th(III) 101 complexes 5. QTAIM analysis 107 6. NBO analysis 116 6.1. Transition metal complexes 125 7. Mulliken population analysis of the An-X interaction 138 8. Nucleus-independent chemical shift analysis 143 9. Mulliken population analysis of the An-arene 149 interaction 10. Conclusions and future work 153 11. References 157 2 Contents Chapter 5. The strength of the An-X interactions 159 1. Introduction 159 2. Methodologies 159 3. Results 162 4. Heterolytic reactions 165 5. Homolytic reactions 170 6. Functional dependence of QTAIM vs bond energies 177 7. QTAIM metrics vs EDA data for [LAnX]n+ complexes 180 7.1. QTAIM metrics vs EDA data for [LAnX’]n+ complexes 184 7.2. QTAIM metrics vs EDA data for [LAnX*]n+ complexes 188 7.3. QTAIM metrics vs EDA data for [LAnX’’]n+ complexes 190 7.4. QTAIM metrics vs EDA data for [LAnX**]n+ 194 complexes 7.5. QTAIM metrics vs EDA data for [LAnX†]n+ complexes 195 8. Conclusions and future work 199 9. References 201 Chapter 6. Bimetallic L2-/4- alkyl and alkynyl complexes 202 1. Introduction 202 2. Computational details 204 3. Results – Complexes 1 and 2 204 4. Complexes 3, 4 and 5 208 5. Complexes 6 and 7 212 5.1 Dipoles of Th6 and Th7 215 5.2 Molecular orbitals of Th6 and Th7 217 5.3 Comparisons with M(IV) and other An(IV) centres 227 for 6 5.4 Comparisons with other An(IV) centres for 7 237 6. Conclusions and future work 245 7. References 248 3 Contents Chapter 7. Overall conclusions and future work 249 1. Geometry optimisations and electronic structures 249 2. The strength of the An-X interactions 250 3. Bimetallic L2-/4- alkyl and alkynyl complexes 251 4. Concluding remarks 252 5. References 254 Appendix 255 1. PBE0 Cartesian coordinates (Å) and SCF energies 256 (Hartrees) of all complexes studied in chapter 4. 2. PBE0 Cartesian coordinates (Å) and SCF energies 264 (Hartrees) of all complexes studied in chapter 5. 3. PBE0 (unless stated otherwise) Cartesian coordinates 278 (Å) and SCF energies (Hartrees) of all complexes studied in chapter 6. 4 List of tables List of tables Chapter 4 Page number Table 4.1. Key bond lengths of thorium and uranium 88 complexes with experimental data. 4.2 Key bond angles of thorium and uranium 88 complexes with experimental data 4.3 MAD analysis for PBE and PBE0 for N(av) 96 4.4 MAD analysis for PBE and PBE0 for An-Ar1 96 4.5 MAD analysis for PBE and PBE0 for An-Ar2 97 4.6 MAD analysis for PBE and PBE0 for An-X 97 4.7 MAD analysis for PBE and PBE0 for Ar-An-Ar 97 4.8 MAD analysis for PBE and PBE0 for N-An-N 98 4.9 MAD analysis for PBE and PBE0 for interplanar 98 angles 4.10 Key bond lengths and angles for Th(III) complexes 99 4.11 Differences of bond lengths for LUIIIX and [LThIVX]+ 100 4.12 Partial charges for Th(IV) complexes 102 4.13 Partial charges for U(III) complexes 102 4.14 Partial charges for Th(III) complexes 102 4.15 QTAIM metrics for [LAnX]n+ 107 4.16 R2 values from trends in figures 4.21 to 4.23. 112 4.17 QTAIM metrics for [LAnNH2]n+ 113 4.18 R2 values from trends in figures 4.24 to 4.26. 115 4.19 NBO data for Th(IV) and Th(III) 117 4.20 R2 values for figure 4.26. 119 4.21 R2 values for figure 4.27. 120 4.22 R2 values for figures 4.28 to 4.30. 122 4.23 R2 values for figures 4.31 to 4.33 125 4.24 M-X bond lengths for Hf(IV) and W(III) 127 5 List of tables 4.25 QTAIM metrics for [LMX]n+ 129 4.26 NBO data for Hf(IV) and W(III) 133 4.27 Mulliken KS-MO data for [LAnX]n+ An centre 138 4.28 Mulliken KS-MO data for [LAnX]n+ X ligand 139 4.29 R2 values for figures 4.49 to 4.51 142 4.30 NICS data for [LThX]+ 145 4.31 Mulliken KS-MO data for [LAnX]n+ An-arene 150 4.32 HOMO energies for [LAnX]n+ 153 Chapter 5 Page number Table 5.1 Key bond lengths for [LAnX]n+ 161 5.2 Key bond angles for [LAnX]n+ 161 5.3 SCF energies ZPE and thermal corrections for the 162 [LThIVX]+ 5.4 SCF energies ZPE and thermal corrections for the 162 LThIIIX 5.5 SCF energies ZPE and thermal corrections for the 163 LUIIIX 5.6 Energies of molecular ionic fragments with ZPE 163 and thermal corrections 5.7 Energies of molecular radical fragments with ZPE 164 and thermal corrections 5.8 Heterolytic bond enthalpies and Gibbs free 165 energies for [LThIVX]+ 5.9 Heterolytic bond enthalpies and Gibbs free 165 energies for LThIIIX 5.10 Heterolytic bond enthalpies and Gibbs free energies 166 for LUIIIX 5.11 Homolytic bond enthalpies and Gibbs free energies for 171 IV + [LTh X] 5.12 Homolytic bond enthalpies and Gibbs free 171 energies for LThIIIX 6 List of tables 5.13 Homolytic bond enthalpies and Gibbs free 172 energies for LUIIIX 5.14 QTAIM charge and interaction energies for Th(IV) 176 and Th(III) 5.15 PBE ΔE values for [LAnX]n+ 178 5.16 QTAIM PBE metrics 178 5.17 Th(IV)-X EDA energies 180 5.18 Th(III)-X EDA energies 180 5.19 U-X EDA energies 181 5.20 An-X EDA energies for [LAnX’]n+ 185 5.21 QTAIM metrics for [LAnX’]n+ 185 5.22 R2 values for EDA vs QTAIM for [LAnX’]n+ 186 5.23 R2 values for EDA vs QTAIM for [LThX]+ and 187 [LThX’]+ 5.24 R2 values for EDA vs QTAIM for LThX and LThX’ 187 5.25 R2 values for EDA vs QTAIM for LUX and LUX’ 187 5.26 An-X EDA energies for [LAnX*]n+ 198 5.27 QTAIM metrics for [LAnX*]n+ 198 5.28 R2 values for EDA vs QTAIM for [LAnX*]n+ 199 5.29 R2 values for EDA vs QTAIM for all [LAnX’]n+ and 190 [LAnX*]n+ 5.30 R2 values for EDA vs QTAIM for all [LThX’]n+ and 192 [LThX*]n+ 5.31 An-X EDA energies for [LAnX’’]n+ 193 5.32 QTAIM metrics for [LAnX’’]n+ 193 5.33 R2 values for EDA vs QTAIM for [LAnX’’]n+ 194 5.34 An-X EDA energies for [LAnX**]n+ 194 5.35 QTAIM metrics for [LAnX**]n+ 195 5.36 R2 values for EDA vs QTAIM for [LAnX**]n+ 195 5.37 An-X EDA energies for [LAnX†]n+ 196 5.38 QTAIM metrics for [LAnX†]n+ 196 5.39 R2 values for EDA vs QTAIM for [LAnX†]n+ 197 7 List of tables Chapter 6 Page number Table 6.1 M-N separation distances for complex 1 207 6.2 Li-N separation distances for different functionals 208 6.3 Energies of reaction for 1/2 to 3/4/5 209 6.4 Energies of reaction for 1 to 3/4/5 for different 211 methods 6.5 Bond lengths of Th6 for PBE0 and experimental data 213 6.6 SCF, enthalpy and Gibbs free energies of Th6 and Th7 214 6.7 SCF, enthalpy and Gibbs free energies of Th6’ and 214 Th7’ 6.8 ΔE, ΔH and ΔG values between a and b of 6 and 7 215 6.9 Dipole moments of Th6 and Th7 216 6.10 SCF energies in PCM model 216 6.11 Energy differences of a and b forms in PCM model 217 6.12 Selected MO energies for Th6 and Th7 218 6.13 Metal contributions to selected MOs (%, Mulliken 219 analysis) for Th6 and Th7 6.14 Selected MO energies for Th6’ and Th7’ 224 6.15 Metal contributions to selected MOs (%, Mulliken 224 analysis) for Th6’ and Th7’ 6.16 PBE energies for An6 complexes (An = Th-Am) 228 6.17 MO energies for An6 230 6.18 SOMO energies for open-shell An6 234 6.19 Total energy differences between An6a and An6b 235 for various combinations of MOs and SOMOs 6.20 PBE energies for An7 complexes (An = Th-Am) 238 6.21 MO energies for An7 239 6.22 SOMO energies for open-shell An7 242 6.23 Total energy differences between An7a and An7b 243 for various combinations of MOs and SOMOs 8 List of figures List of figures Chapter 1 Page number Figure 1.1 Schematic representation of model chemistries 36 according to Pople 1.2 Classification of all types of QTAIM critical points 43 possible in 3D space Chapter 2 Page number Figure 2.1 Representations of 5f and 6d-bonding interactions 54 in actinocenes 2.2 Representations of 5f and 6d-bonding interactions 55 in bis-arene and bis-C5H5 2.3 Chemical structure of [N’’2U]2(C6H6) 60 2.4 Chemical structure of TODGA 60 2.5 Neutral form of trans-calix[2]benzene[2]pyrrolide 66 2.6 Different bonding motifs of L2- and L4- with 67 various metal centres Chapter 3 Page number Figure 3.1 The simplified X ligands 77 3.2 [LAnX]n+ complex with labelled arene and pyrrole 78 rings 3.3 Schematic of M[LAnR] and LAnR’2 79 3.4 Schematic of the [LTh(CCSiMe3)2][NiPR3] 80
Recommended publications
  • Application with the Even-Odd Rule and a Specific Periodic Table for Organic and Inorganic Atoms

    Application with the Even-Odd Rule and a Specific Periodic Table for Organic and Inorganic Atoms

    Open Journal of Physical Chemistry, 2021, 11, 54-63 https://www.scirp.org/journal/ojpc ISSN Online: 2162-1977 ISSN Print: 2162-1969 First Step in Dissociation Process in the Gas Phase for Small Molecules with Neutral Atoms: Application with the Even-Odd Rule and a Specific Periodic Table for Organic and Inorganic Atoms Geoffroy Auvert Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France How to cite this paper: Auvert, G. (2021) Abstract First Step in Dissociation Process in the Gas Phase for Small Molecules with Neutral Dissociations in the gas phase of small molecules have been intensively stu- Atoms: Application with the Even-Odd died and dissociation energies of various gases are available in reference Rule and a Specific Periodic Table for Or- works. Configurations of compounds before and after the dissociation are ganic and Inorganic Atoms. Open Journal of Physical Chemistry, 11, 54-63. usually known, but local charges are not defined. Building on the even-odd https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpc.2021.112003 rule, the topic of a series of previous articles by the same author, the objective of this paper is to show how it can be used to give electronic rules for dissoci- Received: March 17, 2021 Accepted: May 17, 2021 ations in gases. To this end, a specific periodic table is created and used. The Published: May 20, 2021 rules are applied to a selection of more than 30 common molecules, showing that the even-odd rule and its consequences are useful in explaining the phe- Copyright © 2021 by author(s) and nomenon of dissociation in gases.
  • Catalytic Organic Transformations Mediated by Actinide Complexes

    Catalytic Organic Transformations Mediated by Actinide Complexes

    Inorganics 2015, 3, 392-428; doi:10.3390/inorganics3040392 OPEN ACCESS inorganics ISSN 2304-6740 www.mdpi.com/journal/inorganics Review Catalytic Organic Transformations Mediated by Actinide Complexes Isabell S. R. Karmel, Rami J. Batrice and Moris S. Eisen * Schulich Faculty of Chemistry, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Technion City, Haifa 32000, Israel; E-Mails: [email protected] (I.S.R.K.); [email protected] (R.J.B.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel./Fax: +972-4-829-2680. Academic Editors: Stephen Mansell and Steve Liddle Received: 16 September 2015 / Accepted: 9 October 2015 / Published: 30 October 2015 Abstract: This review article presents the development of organoactinides and actinide coordination complexes as catalysts for homogeneous organic transformations. This chapter introduces the basic principles of actinide catalysis and deals with the historic development of actinide complexes in catalytic processes. The application of organoactinides in homogeneous catalysis is exemplified in the hydroelementation reactions, such as the hydroamination, hydrosilylation, hydroalkoxylation and hydrothiolation of alkynes. Additionally, the use of actinide coordination complexes for the catalytic polymerization of α-olefins and the ring opening polymerization of cyclic esters is presented. The last part of this review article highlights novel catalytic transformations mediated by actinide compounds and gives an outlook to the further potential of this field. Keywords: organoactinides; actinide coordination complexes; homogeneous catalysis; hydroelementations; polymerization of olefins; ROP; activation of heterocumulenes 1. Introduction The beginning of modern organoactinide chemistry is often attributed to the synthesis of 8 uranocene, [(η -C8H8)2U] in 1968, as the analogous compound to ferrocene and other transition metal metallocenes [1,2].
  • Open Dissertation Xiang Li 07032018.Pdf

    Open Dissertation Xiang Li 07032018.Pdf

    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Department of Chemistry MECHANOCHEMICAL SYNTHESIS OF CARBON AND CARBON NITRIDE NANOTHREAD SINGLE CRYSTALS A Dissertation in Chemistry by Xiang Li 2018 Xiang Li Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2018 The dissertation of Xiang Li was reviewed and approved* by the following: John V. Badding Professor of Chemistry, Physics and Materials Science and Engineering Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Vincent H. Crespi Professor of Physics, Materials Science and Engineering, and Chemistry Paul S. Cremer Professor of Chemistry and Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Mauricio Terrones Professor of Physics, Chemistry and Materials Science and Engineering Thomas E. Mallouk Professor of Chemistry, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Physics, and Engineering Science and Mechanics Head of the Department of Chemistry *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT Carbon nanomaterials such as fullerenes, nanotubes, and graphene have been widely studied in recent decades. Benefitting from their unique bonding, they possess extraordinary physical and chemical properties. Compared with sp2 hybridized carbon allotropes, there are significantly fewer new carbon materials dominated by sp3 bonding that have been developed. Adamantane and graphane represent the smallest unit and thinnest sheet of diamond possible, respectively. One-dimensional, mostly sp3 hybridized nanocarbon, did not yet exist in 2013, when the first synthesis of carbon nanothreads finally filled up the last remaining entry in the matrix of dimensionality and hybridization of carbon nanomaterials that year. Carbon nanothread was first made by compressing benzene to ~25 GPa in a large-volume anvil cell and slowly decompressing back to ambient pressure by an alumnus of the Badding group.
  • Inorganic Chemistry for Dummies® Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc

    Inorganic Chemistry for Dummies® Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc

    Inorganic Chemistry Inorganic Chemistry by Michael L. Matson and Alvin W. Orbaek Inorganic Chemistry For Dummies® Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River St. Hoboken, NJ 07030-5774 www.wiley.com Copyright © 2013 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey Published simultaneously in Canada No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except as permitted under Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permis- sion of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 646-8600. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, or online at http://www.wiley. com/go/permissions. Trademarks: Wiley, the Wiley logo, For Dummies, the Dummies Man logo, A Reference for the Rest of Us!, The Dummies Way, Dummies Daily, The Fun and Easy Way, Dummies.com, Making Everything Easier, and related trade dress are trademarks or registered trademarks of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and/or its affiliates in the United States and other countries, and may not be used without written permission. All other trade- marks are the property of their respective owners. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book.
  • Diphosphazide-Supported Trialkyl Thorium(IV) Complex Tara K

    Diphosphazide-Supported Trialkyl Thorium(IV) Complex Tara K

    pubs.acs.org/Organometallics Communication Diphosphazide-Supported Trialkyl Thorium(IV) Complex Tara K. K. Dickie, Ashraf A. Aborawi, and Paul G. Hayes* Cite This: Organometallics 2020, 39, 2047−2052 Read Online ACCESS Metrics & More Article Recommendations *sı Supporting Information ABSTRACT: The potassium salt of a new ligand, KLP=N3 (2, κ5 i i − LP=N3 = -2,5-[(4- PrC6H4)N3 P Pr2]2N(C4H2) ), that features two units of the rare phosphazide (RN3 PR3) functionality was synthesized via an incomplete Staudinger reaction between K[2,5- i i ( Pr2P)2N(C4H2)] (1)and4-PrC6H4N3. The diphosphazide ligand was transferred to a thorium(IV) metal center using salt metathesis strategies, yielding LP=N3ThCl3 (3), which contains two intact and coordinated phosphazides. Reaction of complex 3 with 3 equiv of LiCH2SiMe3 resulted in formation of the trialkyl thorium species LP=N3Th(CH2SiMe3)3 (4). In contrast, attempts to synthesize an organothorium complex supported by the previously κ3 reported bisphosphinimine ligand LP=N (LP=N = -2,5- i i − ff [(4- PrC6H4)N P Pr2]2N(C4H2) )aorded the cyclometalated * * κ4 i i i i 2− dialkyl complex L P=NTh(CH2SiMe3)2 (6,L PN = -2-[(4- PrC6H3)N P Pr2]-5-[(4- PrC6H4)N P Pr2]N(C4H2) ) and 1 equiv of free tetramethylsilane. 1 he Staudinger reaction, discovered in 1919, introduced the facile loss of N2, and, accordingly, were overlooked as ′ ’ T the formation of a phosphinimine group (R3P NR ) via viable functional groups in ligand design. Since Staudinger s the reaction of a tertiary phosphine (R3P) with an organic original work, multiple methods have been developed to ′ azide (N3R ), resulting in concomitant loss of N2.
  • Summaries of FY 1997 Research in the Chemical Sciences

    Summaries of FY 1997 Research in the Chemical Sciences

    DOE/NBM-1098 Rev.-1 September 1997 T O EN FE TM N R E A R P G E Y D U • • A N C I I T R E D E M ST A ATES OF Summaries of FY 1997 Research in the Chemical Sciences U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Research Division of Chemical Sciences A searchable version of this summary book is available at the following web address: http://websrv.er.doe.gov/asp/search.asp This search tool is also accessible from the Chemical Sciences web page at: http://www.er.doe.gov/production/bes/chm/chmhome.html Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; prices available from (423) 576-8401 Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161 This document was produced under contract number DE-AC05-76OR00033 between the U.S. Department of Energy and Oak Ridge Associated Universities. ORISE 97-1555 CONTENTS CONTENTS PREFACE ........................................................................ vii Oak Ridge National Laboratory.............................. 42 DIVISION OF CHEMICAL SCIENCES ..................... viii Pacific Northwest National Laboratory .................. 44 PROGRAM DESCRIPTIONS ........................................ ix Heavy Element Chemistry ....................................... 45 LABORATORY ADMINISTRATION ......................... xiii Argonne National Laboratory ................................. 45 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory...............
  • Alkaline-Earth Metal Compounds Oddities and Applications 45 Topics in Organometallic Chemistry

    Alkaline-Earth Metal Compounds Oddities and Applications 45 Topics in Organometallic Chemistry

    Topics in Organometallic Chemistry 45 Sjoerd Harder Editor Alkaline-Earth Metal Compounds Oddities and Applications 45 Topics in Organometallic Chemistry Editorial Board: M. Beller l J. M. Brown l P. H. Dixneuf A. Fu¨rstner l L. J. Gooßen P. Hofmann l T. Ikariya l S. Nolan L. A. Oro l Q.-L. Zhou Topics in Organometallic Chemistry Recently Published Volumes Inventing Reactions Iridium Catalysis Volume Editor: Lukas J. Gooßen Volume Editor: P. G. Andersson Vol. 44, 2013 Vol. 34, 2011 Hydrofunctionalization Iron Catalysis – Fundamentals and Volume Editors: Valentine P. Ananikov, Applications Masato Tanaka Volume Editor: B. Plietker Vol. 43, 2013 Vol. 33, 2011 Organometallics as Catalysts Medicinal Organometallic Chemistry in the Fine Chemical Industry Volume Editors: G. Jaouen, N. Metzler-Nolte Volume Editors: Matthias Beller, Vol. 32, 2010 Hans-Ulrich Blaser C-X Bond Formation Vol. 42, 2012 Volume Editor: A. Vigalok Modern Organoaluminum Reagents: Vol. 31, 2010 Preparation, Structure, Reactivity and Use Transition Metal Complexes of Neutral Volume Editors: Simon Woodward, h1-Carbon Ligands Samuel Dagorne Volume Editors: R. Chauvin, Y. Canac Vol. 41, 2012 Vol. 30, 2010 Organometallic Pincer Chemistry Photophysics of Organometallics Volume Editors: Gerard van Koten, Volume Editor: A. J. Lees David Milstein Vol. 29, 2010 Vol. 40, 2012 Molecular Organometallic Materials Organometallics and Renewables for Optics Volume Editors: Michael A. R. Meier, Volume Editors: H. Le Bozec, V. Guerchais Bert M. Weckhuysen, Pieter C. A. Bruijnincx Vol. 28, 2010 Vol. 39, 2012 Conducting and Magnetic Organometallic Transition Metal Catalyzed Enantioselective Molecular Materials Allylic Substitution in Organic Synthesis Volume Editors: M. Fourmigue´, L. Ouahab Volume Editor: Uli Kazmaier Vol.
  • Hayes, P. G. “Actinide Pincer Chemistry: a New Frontier”

    Hayes, P. G. “Actinide Pincer Chemistry: a New Frontier”

    Chapter 7 Actinide Pincer Chemistry: A New Frontier Connor S. MacNeil, Tara K.K. Dickie and Paul G. Hayes University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB, Canada Chapter Outline 7.1 Introduction 133 7.3.5 Redox-Active Ligands 156 7.2 General Synthetic Strategies for Preparing 7.4 Catalytic Reactions Mediated by Actinide Actinide Pincer Complexes 135 Pincer Complexes 167 7.3 Synthesis, Structure, and Stoichiometric Reactivity 7.4.1 Hydroamination 167 of Actinide Pincer Complexes 136 7.4.2 Ring-Opening Polymerization 168 7.3.1 Neutral Ligands 136 7.4.3 Ethylene Polymerization 169 7.3.2 Monoanionic Ligands 137 7.5 Conclusion 169 7.3.3 Dianionic Ligands 142 Acknowledgments 169 7.3.4 Trianionic Ligands 156 References 170 7.1 INTRODUCTION Chemistry with actinide metals has historically been underdeveloped due to the inherent difficulties in handling molecu- lar actinide complexes. Actinide chemistry is generally only practiced with thorium and uranium for reasons of cost and availability, as well as radioactivity. While all the actinide elements are radioactive, thorium and uranium have α 1 . extremely long half-lives compared to most other metals in the actinide series. Thorium-232 is an -emitter with t/2 14 billion years. Depleted uranium is primarily U-238, which also emits an α-particle when it decays and has a half-life of more than 4 billion years. For these reasons, uranium and thorium are generally considered weakly radioactive [1,2]. Despite the associated complications, actinide chemistry is of great fundamental interest, and has thus blossomed into a rapidly emerging subfield of both inorganic and organometallic chemistry.
  • Non-Donor Ligands in Organoactinide Chemistry

    Non-Donor Ligands in Organoactinide Chemistry

    NON-DONOR LIGANDS IN ORGANOACTINIDE CHEMISTRY RIGID NON-DONOR PINCER LIGANDS IN ORGANOACTINIDE CHEMISTRY By NICHOLAS R. ANDREYCHUK, H.B.Sc A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy McMaster University © Copyright by Nicholas R. Andreychuk, March 2017. Ph.D. Thesis Nicholas R. Andreychuk Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology McMaster University DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (2017) McMaster University (CHEMISTRY) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: Rigid NON-Donor Pincer Ligands in Organoactinide Chemistry AUTHOR: Nicholas R. Andreychuk SUPERVISOR: Prof. David J. H. Emslie NUMBER OF PAGES: xli, 312 ii Ph.D. Thesis Nicholas R. Andreychuk Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology McMaster University Abridged Abstract The coordination- and organometallic chemistry of uranium complexes bearing the non-carbocyclic ancillary ligand XA2 (4,5-bis(2,6-diisopropylanilido)-2,7-di-tert- butyl-9,9-dimethylxanthene) has been developed as a major focus of this thesis. A number of air-sensitive actinide chloro complexes and alkyl derivatives featuring reactive An–C bonds were prepared, and investigated using a variety of structural and spectroscopic analytical techniques, including X-ray diffraction, NMR spectroscopy, elemental analysis, and electrochemical methods. The research described in this thesis serves to expand the currently underdeveloped, fundamental chemistry of actinide complexes supported by non-carbocyclic (i.e. non-cyclopentadienyl) ligands. For example, the use of the prototypical xanthene-based ligand XA2 has led to neutral dialkyl uranium(IV) complexes which a) react with alkyl anions to yield anionic trialkyl ‘ate’ complexes, b) C–H activate neutral pyridines to yield organouranium(IV) species featuring cyclometalated pyridine-based ligands, and c) react with Lewis acids to yield rare examples of cationic monoalkyl uranium(IV) complexes featuring coordinated arene ligands.
  • The Chemical Complexities of Plutonium David L

    The Chemical Complexities of Plutonium David L

    The Chemical Complexities of Plutonium David L. Clark ew people have ever seen plutonium, and far fewer have actually handled or manipu- lated it. Yet this manmade element has arguably altered the course of civilization as Fmuch as copper, bronze, iron, or steel. Within five years of its synthesis, the primary use of plutonium was for the release of nuclear energy in weapons of mass destruction, and it seemed that the new element might lead the human race to the brink of self-annihilation. But instead, plutonium has become a stabilizing agent in global politics, forcing the human race to govern itself without resorting to nuclear war. Never before has a simple chemical element had such a profound impact on the consciousness of mankind. Plutonium has had a similarly humbling impact in the more circumscribed arena of science. Incredibly, it displays physicochemical behaviors that are among the most complex of any element in the periodic table. The pure element exhibits seven distinct crystal phases, is highly reactive, and is known to form compounds, complexes, or alloys with virtually every other element. Molten plutonium is highly corrosive and will slowly react with its container, causing difficulties for handling. When elemental plutonium reacts to give up its valence electrons, it can form a wide variety of positively charged ions with the ability to form up to twelve chemical bonds to other ions or molecules in solution. The element can exhibit five oxidation states, and under certain chemical conditions, four different oxidation states can be present in appreciable amounts simultaneously! No other element displays such a complex chemistry.
  • Principles of Chemical Recognition and Transport in Extractive

    Principles of Chemical Recognition and Transport in Extractive

    2011 Separations and Heavy Element Chemistry Research Meeting Hyatt Regency, Baltimore, MD April 26 - 29, 2011 Office of Basic Energy Sciences Chemical Sciences, Geosciences & Biosciences Division Program and Abstracts for the 2011 Separations and Heavy Element Chemistry Research Meeting Hyatt Regency Baltimore, MD April 26–29, 2011 Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division Office of Basic Energy Sciences Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy i Cover Graphics: The cover artwork is used by permission from the authors and journals for the associated covers. These covers are related to recently published papers by PIs speaking in this meeting’s program. From left to right and top to bottom they are: Christopher Cahill on p. 19 of this book. Also see C. E. Rowland and C. L. Cahill (2010) "Capturing Hydrolysis Products in the Solid State: Effects of pH on Uranyl Squarates under Ambient Conditions." Inorganic Chemistry, 49(19), 8668–8673. Wibe A. de Jong on p. 77 of this book. Also see V.A. Glezakou and W.A. de Jong, "Cluster-models for Uranyl(VI) adsorption on α-alumina." J. Phys. Chem. A 2011, 115, 1257 (2011). Jaqueline Kiplinger on p. 9 of this book. Also see Thomson, R. K.; Graves, C. R.; Scott, B. L.; Kiplinger, J. L. “Noble Reactions for the Actinides: Safe Gold-Based Access to Organouranium and Azide Complexes,” Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 1451–1455. Jaqueline Kiplinger on p. 9 of this book. Also see Cantat, T.; Graves, C. R.; Scott, B. L.; Kiplinger, J. L. “Challenging the Metallocene Dominance in Actinide Chemistry with a Soft PNP Pincer Ligand: New Uranium Structures and Reactivity Patterns,” Angew.
  • Myersalexander.Pdf (3.037Mb)

    Myersalexander.Pdf (3.037Mb)

    SYNTHESIS AND REACTIVITY OF LOW-VALENT URANIUM AND NEPTUNIUM COMPLEXES _______________________________________ A Dissertation presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri-Columbia _______________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy _____________________________________________________ By ALEXANDER J. MYERS Dr. Justin R. Walensky, Dissertation Supervisor DECEMBER 2019 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled SYNTHESIS AND REACTIVITY OF LOW-VALENT URANIUM AND NEPTUNIUM COMPLEXES presented by Alexander J. Myers, a candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Chemistry, and hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Professor Justin R. Walensky Professor Silvia S. Jurisson Professor Wesley H. Bernskoetter Professor Bret D. Ulery Acknowledgements I would like to thank my wife, Heather Saxon, who encouraged me to go to graduate school in the first place. None of this would have happened if it wasn’t for you. My advisor, Justin Walensky, for all of his help, advice and the opportunities he has given me. I don’t know how you put up with me all these years but I’m glad you did. Wayne Lukens for all of his help; teaching me about preparing and running my SQUID and EPR samples. Charles Barnes, Steven Kelley, and Wei Wycoff, for their help with X-ray Crystallography and NMR spectroscopy Everyone in the Walensky group: Andrew Behrle, Pokpong Rungthanaphatsophon, Michael Tarlton, Robert Ward, Sean Vilanova, Alexander Gremillion, Andrew Lane, Andrew Breshears, Kira Behm, Matthew Vollmer, Steven Renfroe, and Jonathan Fajen. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................