Department of Transportation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Department of Transportation Vol. 80 Wednesday, No. 82 April 29, 2015 Part II Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration National Hazardous Materials Route Registry; Notice VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:52 Apr 28, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\29APN2.SGM 29APN2 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES2 23860 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 82 / Wednesday, April 29, 2015 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION site is the source of information in this procedures that States and Tribal notice and displays Hazardous Materials Governments must follow to establish, Federal Motor Carrier Safety (HM) route listings that reflect any maintain, and enforce designations Administration changes made after the publication date specifying road and highway routes [Docket No. FMCSA–2014–0022] of this notice. within their jurisdictions over which HRCQ/RAM and NRHM may or may not II. Legal Basis for This Action National Hazardous Materials Route be transported, and to impose Registry Section 5112 of 49 U.S.C. paragraphs limitations or requirements for (a)(2) and (b) permit States and Tribal transporting these materials over AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Governments to designate and limit applicable roads and highways. The Administration (FMCSA), Department highway routes over which HM may be Office of Management and Budget of Transportation (DOT). transported provided the State or Tribal (OMB) has approved these collections of ACTION: Notice; current listing of Government complies with standards information under control number designated and restricted routes for prescribed by the Secretary of 2126–0014, Transportation of hazardous materials Transportation (the Secretary) and Hazardous Materials, Highway Routing. meets publication requirements in SUMMARY: This notice provides the section 5112(c). To establish standards III. Background and Response to current National Hazardous Materials under paragraph (b), the Secretary must Comments Route Registry (NHMRR), which is a consult with the States, and, under In 49 CFR part 172, the Pipeline and listing, as reported by State and Tribal section 5112(c), coordinate with the Hazardous Materials Safety Government routing officials, of all States to publish periodically a list of Administration (PHMSA) publishes a designated and restricted road and currently effective HM highway routing list of proper shipping names with highway routes for transportation of designations and restrictions. Subpart C corresponding identification numbers highway route controlled quantities of 49 CFR part 397 sets out the for HM that must be used when offering (HRCQ) of Class 7 (radioactive) procedural requirements States and for transportation, or transporting any materials (RAM) (HRCQ/RAM) and non- Tribal Governments must follow to chemical or product that is a HM, radioactive hazardous materials establish, maintain, or enforce routing hazardous substance or hazardous (NRHMs) transportation. The listing in designations for the transport of waste, as defined in 49 CFR 171.8. this notice supersedes the NHMRR placardable quantities of NRHM. In PHMSA lists HM in nine Classes, based published on July 14, 2014, and Subpart D, § 397.103 sets out the on the type of substance and hazard, includes current route limitations and requirements for designating preferred and determines the quantities that allowances, and information on State routes for HRCQ/RAM shipments as an require a placard on the vehicle (e.g., and Tribal Government routing agency alternative to, or in addition to Interstate truck, railroad car) transporting the contacts reported to FMCSA as of March System highways. For HRCQ/RAM substance so that emergency responders 30, 2015. The notice also responds to shipments, a preferred route is defined can identify the hazard at a distance. comments received on the Agency’s as an Interstate Highway for which no State and Tribal Governments may Notice and request for comment on this alternative route is designated by the designate routes for transporting these subject published on July 14, 2014. State; a route specifically designated by HM. The States and Tribal Governments DATES: Effective Date: April 29, 2015. the State; or both. See § 397.103(b). For may also establish limitations for the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. the definition of NHRM routes, see use of routes under section 5112 by Roxane Oliver, (202) 366–0735, or § 397.65 ‘‘routing designations.’’ using the required procedures specified [email protected], Hazardous Under a delegation from the in 49 CFR part 397. Carriers must Materials Division, Office of Secretary,1 FMCSA has authority to develop written route plans for Enforcement and Compliance, Federal implement 49 U.S.C. 5112 and 5125(c). transporting HRCQ/RAM, and adhere to Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Currently, 49 CFR 397.73 establishes the written route plan [§§ 397.71 and 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., Washington, public information and reporting 397.101(d)]. 2 DC 20590. Office hours are from 9 a.m. requirements for NRHM, by States or The NHMRR provides publicly to 5 p.m., E.T., Monday through Friday, Tribal Governments who are required to accessible information concerning except for Federal holidays. furnish information regarding any new designated routes, which are mandatory or changed routes to FMCSA within 60 assigned routes for transporting HM SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: days after establishment. Under 49 CFR shipments and restricted routes over Table of Contents 397.103, a State routing designation for which such shipments may not be I. Electronic Access to the National HRCQ/RAM routes (preferred routes) as transported. FMCSA last published the Hazardous Materials Route Registry an alternative to, or in addition to an NHMRR on July 14, 2014 (79 FR 40844). II. Legal Basis for This Action Interstate System highway is effective That listing reflected the Agency’s III. Background and Response to Comments when the authorized routing agency validation through publicly available IV. About the Tables in the National provides FMCSA with written information of route designations and Hazardous Materials Route Registry V. Route Ordering Approach notification, FMCSA acknowledges limitations, using as the starting point a VI. National Hazardous Materials Route receipt in writing, and the route is 2008 spreadsheet developed to address Registry published in FMCSA’s National requirements of the Implementing Hazardous Material Route Registry. Recommendations of the 9/11 I. Electronic Access to the National FMCSA’s regulations in 49 CFR part 397 Commission Act of 2007. While Hazardous Materials Route Registry also include other standards and validating HM route entries, FMCSA To find the most up-to-date listing of identified other information that could hazmat routes, you may access the 1 49 CFR 1.87(d)(2). either enhance the NHMRR or correct NHMRR directly at: http:// 2 49 CFR 397.65 defines NRHM as, ‘‘A non- identified issues. (For detailed radioactive hazardous material transported by www.fmcsa.dot.gov/regulations/ motor vehicle in types and quantities which require information, see the July 2014 Federal hazardous-materials/national- placarding, pursuant to Table 1 or 2 of 49 CFR Register document.) The July 2014 hazardous-materials-route-registry. This 172.504.’’ notice also sought comment on a new VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:52 Apr 28, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29APN2.SGM 29APN2 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES2 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 82 / Wednesday, April 29, 2015 / Notices 23861 approach to ordering the routes and the Agency to update HM route listings the NHMRR: Connecticut, Hawaii, presenting the listings table. in coordination with the States’ Kansas, Maine, Mississippi, Missouri, submissions. A citizen who believes Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Response to Comments there are errors in these listings, such as North Carolina, North Dakota, South The Agency received five comments the individual who commented on this Carolina, Vermont, and Wisconsin. on the notice. Two industry notice, should contact the State entity Note, too, that the NHMRR does not organizations the American Trucking responsible for designating and include HM route designations and Associations (ATA) and the Institute of maintaining that State’s listings. restrictions applicable to lands under Makers of Explosives (IME) endorsed The Agency has corrected the listing the jurisdiction of Federal entities the new route order approach and based on comments received from the except for National Park Service (NPS) content listing. ATA commended State agencies with responsibility for lands in Montana and South Dakota. FMCSA for updating the routes with a HM route designations. The technical The listing of HM routes on NPS lands ‘‘user-friendly planning tool.’’ However, amendments referenced above should is based on information readily ATA encouraged FMCSA to update the result in the maintenance of a current available to FMCSA at the time of NHMRR process to implement the list of State and Tribal agencies and publication of this notice and may not requirements of section 33013 of the contacts that can provide current be complete. Moving Forward for Progress in the 21st information on HM routes. Going NPS regulations generally prohibit Century Act of 2012 (MAP–21) forward, these entities can promote commercial motor vehicles and traffic in concerning establishing the form, carrier and driver compliance by using National Parks, including commercial
Recommended publications
  • Top 10 Bridges by State.Xlsx
    Top 10 Most Traveled U.S. Structurally Deficient Bridges by State, 2015 2015 Year Daily State State County Type of Bridge Location Status in 2014 Status in 2013 Built Crossings Rank 1 Alabama Jefferson 1970 136,580 Urban Interstate I65 over U.S.11,RR&City Streets at I65 2nd Ave. to 2nd Ave.No Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 2 Alabama Mobile 1964 87,610 Urban Interstate I-10 WB & EB over Halls Mill Creek at 2.2 mi E US 90 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 3 Alabama Jefferson 1972 77,385 Urban Interstate I-59/20 over US 31,RRs&City Streets at Bham Civic Center Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 4 Alabama Mobile 1966 73,630 Urban Interstate I-10 WB & EB over Southern Drain Canal at 3.3 mi E Jct SR 163 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 5 Alabama Baldwin 1969 53,560 Rural Interstate I-10 over D Olive Stream at 1.5 mi E Jct US 90 & I-10 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 6 Alabama Baldwin 1969 53,560 Rural Interstate I-10 over Joe S Branch at 0.2 mi E US 90 Not Deficient Not Deficient 7 Alabama Jefferson 1968 41,990 Urban Interstate I 59/20 over Arron Aronov Drive at I 59 & Arron Aronov Dr. Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 8 Alabama Mobile 1964 41,490 Rural Interstate I-10 over Warren Creek at 3.2 mi E Miss St Line Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 9 Alabama Jefferson 1936 39,620 Urban other principal arterial US 78 over Village Ck & Frisco RR at US 78 & Village Creek Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 10 Alabama Mobile 1967 37,980 Urban Interstate
    [Show full text]
  • Interstate 11 Update
    Management Comm ittee Maricopa Association of Governments June 9, 2010 Interstate 11 Update © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 1 Bordering States COG/MPO DISCUSSIONS TiTourism and RRtiecreation . GEORGE:ST . GEORGE:ST Scottsdale of Utah? California California Las Las Navajjj o Nation relates Population: Population:Vegas Vegas Grand Canyon more to New Mexico TOURISM TOURISM 60 M60 M by 2050!by 2050! 1717 II --1717 2525 High-tech High -tech Bedroom Bedroom Extension? Extension? communitycommunity community community industry along II --2525 People People Businesses Businesses Eager/ Springerville Second homes provide shopping/ services to Western New ECONOMIC DE Tourists Tourists Mexico Mexico Commercial Vehicles agriculture agriculture V Mexico’s fastest ELOPMENT growing states are in the north (Sonora, Chihuahua, and Nuevo Leon) Leon) Keyyy CONNECTIONS to Guaymas, Hermosillo, Punta Colonet maquiladoras Proposed Interstate 11 Corridor © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 2 Arizona Arizona COG/MPO DISCUSSIONS .. Commercial Trucking .. Distribution throughout Southwest USA R e c r e a t i o n .. Elevation in Central Arizona (SR(SR--89/SR89/SR--69)69) Pearce Pearce Growth Growth .. USUS--95/SR95/SR--95 Corridor95 Corridor Ferry Ferry Limitations CANAMEX.. CANAMEX .. Natural Resources .. Copper in Safford Area InIn-- .. Emerging Industries rn rn EX?EX? migggration eeee .. Welton Oil Refinery MMMM Warehousing.. Warehousing WestWest CANACANA .. Sun Corridor Megaregion Population Prescott.. Prescott will double Copppper pp mining mining Phoenix.. Phoenix Tucson.. Tucson Agrarian Agrarian Industrial Industrial .. Recreation and Tourism Incoming Incoming Informal Truck Bypasses Commerce! Warehousing/Distribution Hub Proposed Interstate 11 Corridor © 2010, All Rights Reserved. 3 2006 Tonnage of TrailerTrailer--onon--FlatcarFlatcar and ContainerContainer--onon--FlatcarFlatcar Intermodal Moves Proposed Interstate 11 Corridor © 2010, All Rights Reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2012 Storm Data Publication
    DECEMBER 2012 VOLUME 54 STORM DATA NUMBER 12 AND UNUSUAL WEATHER PHENOMENA WITH LATE REPORTS AND CORRECTIONS NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION noaa NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SATELLITE, DATA AND INFORMATION SERVICE NATIONAL CLIMATIC DATA CENTER, ASHEVILLE, NC Cover: This cover represents a few weather conditions such as snow, hurricanes, tornadoes, heavy rain and flooding that may occur in any given location any month of the year. (Photos courtesy of NCDC) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena......…….…....…………...…...........….........................3 Reference Notes.............……...........................……….........…..….….............................................252 STORM DATA (ISSN 0039-1972) National Climatic Data Center Editor: Rhonda Herndon STORM DATA is prepared, and distributed by the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service (NESDIS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena narratives and Hurricane/Tropical Storm summaries are prepared by the National Weather Service. Monthly and annual statistics and summaries of tornado and lightning events resulting in deaths, injuries, and damage are compiled by the National Climatic Data Center and the National Weather Service’s (NWS) Storm Prediction Center. STORM DATA contains all confirmed information on storms available to our staff at the time of publication. Late reports and corrections will be printed in each edition. Except
    [Show full text]
  • The George Parks Highway Scenic Byway
    The George Parks Highway Scenic Byway Corridor Partnership Plan Draft 1—10/17/2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Background on Byways 3. Planning Process and Public Involvement 4. Intrinsic Quality Assessment and Management 5. Transportation and Safety 6. Tourism and Marketing 7. Interpretation 8. Vision, Goals, and Strategies 9. Conclusion Appendix A: Acknowledgements Appendix B: Public Involvement Plan Appendix C: Related Studies and References George Parks Highway Scenic Byway Corridor Partnership Plan 1. INTRODUCTION The Parks Highway The George Parks Highway, usually simply called the Parks Highway, runs 323 miles from the Glenn Highway in the Matanuska Valley to Fairbanks in the Alaska Interior. Completed in 1971, the Parks Highway is one of the most important roads in Alaska. Linking the state’s two largest cities—Anchorage and Fairbanks—with spectacular natural surroundings and unparalleled recreation opportunities, this highway winds through the kind of scenery that typifies the Alaskan Interior: the continent’s highest peaks and largest glaciers, alpine tundra, taiga forests, wild rivers, and vast expanses inhabited only by wildlife. It is a common misconception that the name "Parks Highway" comes from the route's proximity to parklands. In fact, it is in honor of George Alexander Parks, governor of the Territory of Alaska from 1925 to 1933. However, the aptness of the name was recognized when it was chosen. The Parks Highway penetrates the wilderness of Interior Alaska, providing access to the region’s two largest protected areas: Denali National Park and Preserve and Denali State Park. At these two parks, travelers can indulge in myriad recreation activities during all seasons.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 RTP/SCS Transportation Finance Appendix, Adopted April
    TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMFINANCE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS APPENDIX ADOPTED | APRIL 2016 INTRODUCTION 1 REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS 1 CORE AND REASONABLY AVAILABLE REVENUES 3 EXPENDITURE CATEGORIES AND METHODOLOGY 14 SUMMARY OF REVENUE SOURCES AND EXPENDITURES 18 APPENDIX A: DETAILS ABOUT REVENUE SOURCES 21 APPENDIX B: SCAG REGIONAL FINANCIAL MODEL 30 APPENDIX TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM I TRANSPORTATION FINANCE APPENDIX C: ADOPTED | APRIL 2016 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR REASONABLY AVAILABLE REVENUE SOURCES 34 APPENDIX D: FINANCIAL PLAN ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST 39 TRANSPORTATION FINANCE INTRODUCTION REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS In accordance with federal fiscal constraint requirements (23 U.S.C. § 134(i)(2)(E)), the The region’s revenue forecast timeframe for the 2016 RTP/SCS is FY2015-16 through Transportation Finance Appendix for the 2016 RTP/SCS identifies how much money the FY2039-40. Consistent with federal guidelines, the financial plan takes into account Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) reasonably expects will be available inflation and reports statistics in nominal (year-of-expenditure) dollars. The underlying data to support our region’s surface transportation investments. The financially constrained 2016 are based on financial planning documents developed by the local county transportation RTP/SCS includes both a “traditional” core revenue forecast comprised of existing local, commissions and transit operators. The revenue model also uses information from the state and federal sources and more innovative but reasonably available sources of revenue California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the California Transportation to implement a program of infrastructure improvements to keep freight and people moving. Commission (CTC). The regional forecasts incorporate the county forecasts where available The financial plan further documents progress made since past RTPs and describes steps and fill data using a common framework.
    [Show full text]
  • 700 S Barracks St WHSE 9& 10 LEASE DD JG .Indd
    Port of Pensacola - WHSE 9 & 10 52,500-92,500 SF WHSE +/- Port of Pensacola, one of Florida’s 15 Deep Water Ports PORT PENSACOLA FACTS: Shortest steaming distance pier side to the 1st sea buoy in the Gulf of Mexico 55+ acre facility (zoned industrial); 24/7 operations with security 3,370 feet of vessel berthing space on 6 deep draft berths (33 ft channel depth) CSX rail service & superior on-Port rail availability and access 400,000± SF of covered storage in six general warehouses Signifi cant Paved dockside area for cargo laydown, heavy lift, or special project storage One of Florida’s 15 Deep Water Ports and integrated into Florida Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) DeeDee Davis, SIOR MICP John Griffi ng, SIOR CRE +1 850 433 0577 +1 850 450 5126 [email protected] jgriffi [email protected] WHSE 9 & 10 Ter ms WHSE 9&10 Protected Harbor 11 miles from #1 Sea Buoy Quickest Vessel Egress Along the Gulf of Mexico Zoned M-1, SSD, WRD (City of Pensacola) Building and Leasing Description Term- Building 9-52,500 SF Clear Span WHSE One (1) year- negotiable that can be expanded into a partially completed WHSE to total 92,000 SF. Lease Type- NNN Tenant has the option to complete the warehouse to their specifi cations. $6/PSF, plus NNN, S/T Clear Span Zoned M-1, SSD, WRD (City of Pensacola) 50 x 50’ column spacing Two (2) 20’8” x 16’ Overhead Doors Additional acreage available for ground lease Lease Rate $26,000-46,000 per mo, plus NNN, plus S/T Port of Pensacola- WHSE 9 & 10 STRATEGIC - Port Pensacola is located on the Gulf of Mexico only 11 miles
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Classification Update Report for the Pocatello/Chubbuck Urbanized Area
    Functional Classification Update Report For the Pocatello/Chubbuck Urbanized Area Functional Classification Update Report Introduction The Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973 required the use of functional highway classification to update and modify the Federal-aid highway systems by July 1, 1976. This legislative requirement is still effective today. Functional classification is the process by which streets and highways are grouped into classes, or systems, according to the character of service they are intended to provide. The functional classification system recognizes that streets cannot be treated as independent, but rather they are intertwined and should be considered as a whole. Each street has a specific purpose or function. This function can be characterized by the level of access to surrounding properties and the length of the trip on that specific roadway. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) functional classification system for urban areas is divided into urban principal arterials, minor arterial streets, collector streets, and local streets. Principal arterials include interstates, expressways, and principal arterials. Eligibility for Federal Highway Administration funding and to provide design standards and access criteria are two important reasons to classify roadway. The region is served by Interstate 15 (north/South) and Interstate 86 (east/west). While classified within the arterial class, they are designated federally and do not change locally. Interstates will be shown in the functional classification map, but they will not be specifically addressed in this report. Functional Classification Update The Idaho Transportation Department has the primary responsibility for developing and updating a statewide highway functional classification in rural and urban areas to determine the functional usage of the existing roads and streets.
    [Show full text]
  • Highway Boondoggles 6 Big Projects
    HIGHWAY BOONDOGGLES 6 Big Projects. Bigger Price Tags. Limited Benefits. HIGHWAY BOONDOGGLES 6 Big Projects. Bigger Price Tags. Limited Benefits. WRITTEN BY: GIDEON WEISSMAN AND BRYN HUXLEY-REICHER FRONTIER GROUP MATTHEW CASALE AND JOHN STOUT U.S. PIRG EDUCATION FUND DECEMBER 2020 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors wish to thank Kevin Brubaker of Environmental Law & Policy Center, Clint Richmond of Massachusetts Sierra Club, Chris DeScherer and Sarah Stokes of Southern En- vironmental Law Center, Wendy Landman of WalkBoston, Jenna Stevens of Environment Florida, Ben Hellerstein of Environment Massachusetts, Abe Scarr of Illinois PIRG and Bay Scoggin of TexPIRG for their review of drafts of this document, as well as their insights and suggestions. Thanks also to Frontier Group interns Christiane Paulhus and Hannah Scholl, and Susan Rakov, Tony Dutzik, David Lippeatt and Adrian Pforzheimer of Frontier Group for editorial support. The authors bear responsibility for any factual errors. Policy recommendations are those of NCPIRG Education Fund. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of our funders or those who provided review. Project maps included in this report should be considered approximations based on publicly avail- able information and not used for planning purposes. 2020 NCPIRG Education Fund. Some Rights Reserved. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 Unported License. To view the terms of this license, visit creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0. With public debate around important issues often dominated by special interests pursu- ing their own narrow agendas, NCPIRG Education Fund offers an independent voice that works on behalf of the public interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinknyc+2020-08-20A.Pdf
    ReThinkNYC Requests that ReThinkNYC Proposals be Treated as Alternatives to be Studied ReThinkNYC • New York, NY • August,20 2020 Reimagined Penn Station’s Main Hall. Digital Rendering by NOVA Concepts. “The Pennsylvania Station in New York is like some vast basilica of old that towers above the terror of the dark as bulwark and protection to the soul.” Langston Hughes 1. Introduction: ReThinkNYC Requests that ReThinkNYC Proposals be Treated as Alternatives to be Studied 7th Avenue Facade rendering by Jeff Stikeman RethinkNYC submits the following supplemental statement and proposals to their July 20, 2020 preliminary written and verbal submissions which were made in response to the Empire State Development Corps Draft Scope of Work (“DSOW”) and request for Public Comment. RethinkNYC asks that this supplementary submission, which incorporates and adds to the prior submissions(with any changes noted), be read as a unified document. RethinkNYC requests that the proposals submitted today be considered as an “alternative(s) to be studied” as set forth on page 53 of the DSOW. While RethinkNYC’s more specific criticism’s are set forth immediately below, RethinkNYC’s overarching criticism and reason for sponsoring alternatives is that the proposed Empire State Complex fails to sufficiently unlock the potential that a modernized Penn Station and transit network would have on the economy, the region and nation’s ecology, aesthetics, fair housing and accessability to the job market, among many other advantages. While the DSOW acknowledges other infrastructure projects — Gateway, Sunnyside Yards and the Port Authority Bus Terminal — it does not coordinate or harmonize these proposals in a way that maximizes their impacts for the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Acre Gas, Food & Lodging Development Opportunity Interstate
    New 9+/-Acre Gas, Food & Lodging Development Opportunity Interstate 15 & Dale Evans Parkway Apple Valley, CA Freeway Location Traffic Counts in Excess of 66,000VPD 1 Acre Pads Available, For Sale, Ground Lease or Build-to-Suit Highlights Gateway to Apple Valley Freeway Exposure / Frontage to I-15 in excess of 66,000 VPD Off/On Ramp Location. Located in highly sought after freeway ramp location on I-15 in high desert corridor Interstate I-15 heavily Traveled with Over 2 Million Vehicles Per Month Located 20 Miles South of Barstow/Lenwood, 10 Miles North of Victorville Located in Area with High Demand for Gas, Food and Lodging Conveniently Located Midway Between Southern California and Las Vegas, Nevada Adam Farmer P. (951) 696-2727 Xpresswest Bullet Train from Victorville to Las Vegas plans to Cell. (951) 764-3744 build station across freeway. www.xpresswest.com [email protected] 26856 Adams Ave Suite 200 Murrieta, CA 92562 This information is compiled from data that we believe to be correct but, no liability is assumed by this company as to accuracy of such data Area / I-15 Gateway To Apple Valley Site consists of a 9 acre development at the North East Corner of Dale Evans Parkway and Interstate 15 located in Apple Valley. Site offers freeway frontage, on/off ramp position strategically to capture all traffic traveling on the I-15. Development will offer 9 pad sites available for gas, food, multi tenant and lodging. Interstate 15 runs North and South with traffic counts in excess of 66,000 ADT. Pads will be available for sale, ground lease or build-to-suit.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation/4
    TRANSPORTATION/4 4.1/OVERVIEW Like the rest of the City, Biloxi’s transportation system was The City of Biloxi is in a rebuilding mode, both to replace aging profoundly impacted by Hurricane Katrina. Prior to Hurricane infrastructure and to repair and improve the roadways and fa- Katrina, the City was experiencing intensive development of cilities that were damaged by Katrina and subsequent storms. coastal properties adjacent to Highway 90, including condo- - minium, casino, and retail projects. Katrina devastated High- lowing reconstruction of U.S. Highway 90, the Biloxi Bridge, way 90 and other key transportation facilities, highlighting andPre-Katrina casinos. traffic Many volumes transportation and congestion projects haveare in returned progress fol or Biloxi’s dependence on a constrained network of roadways under consideration, providing an opportunity for coordinat- and bridges connecting to inland areas. ed, long-range planning for a system that supports the future The City of Biloxi operated in a State of Emergency for over land use and development pattern of Biloxi. In that context, two years following Hurricane Katrina’s landfall on August 29, the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan lays 2005. Roadway access to the Biloxi Peninsula is provided by out a strategy to develop a multi-modal system that improves Highway 90 and Pass Road from the west and by three key mobility and safety and increases the choices available to resi- bridges from the east and north: Highway 90 via the Biloxi dents and visitors to move about the City. Bay Bridge from Oceans Springs and I-110 and Popp’s Ferry Road over Back Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Denali for Families
    Denali for Families A Visitor’s Guide to Denali National Park and Preserve The current park lands of Denali National Park and Preserve include the traditional homelands of the Dene, also known as the Athabascan People. They are the Ahtna, Benhti Kenaga’ (Tanana), Dinak’I (Upper Kuskokwim), and Denaakk’e (Koyukon), and in the southeast park, the Dena’ina. For thousands of years, these peoples have interacted with the land to make homes, hunt and gather foods, create art, and trade. Alaska Natives have been stewards of the land since long before it was managed by the National Park Service, and they continute to practice traditional values and utilize park resources today. Credits Author: Kris Capps Editors: Jill Bruebaker, Ellen Grover, Sierra Mclane, Sarah Hayes, and Laura Vachula. Layout and Design: Ellen Grover, Elizabeth Menezes, Laura Vachula, and Debbie Whitecar Inspiration and Oversight: Christie Denzel Anastasia, Kristen Friesen, Philip Hooge, Shelli Huls, Sierra McLane, Ingrid Nixon, and Lisa Oakley Many thanks to the families who provided photographs, quotes, and inspiration for sharing Denali with others. May families everywhere get to experience special outdoor places. Front Cover: Emily Mesner This guide was produced by the National Park Service and Alaska Geographic working in partnership through the Murie Science and Learning Center. Denali for Families A Visitor’s Guide to Denali National Park and Preserve Produced in 2015 NPS Photo Updated in 2020 Contents How To Use This Book 1 Park Road, Entrance Area, and Trails 3 Planning
    [Show full text]