“From Quiet Woods to Tide Kissed Shore:”

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

“From Quiet Woods to Tide Kissed Shore:” Abstract ―From Quiet Woods to Tide Kissed Shore:‖ Searching for the Colonial Port of Sunbury, Georgia‘ By Stephen D. Dilk April, 2012 Director: Nathan Richards Department of History This thesis chronicles efforts to examine a unique colonial waterfront complex in Sunbury, Georgia comprised of four distinct colonial wharf sites. To carry out an explanation of these features and Sunbury‘s overall land-water interface, this thesis utilizes Immanuel Wallerstein‘s World-Systems Theory in conjunction with extensive historical research and archaeological survey. The project‘s primary aim will be to identify novel aspects of Sunbury‘s economy and society through archaeology. Secondary goals include an investigation into the port‘s role locally and abroad. A corollary to this aim will be to connect the lifespan of the wharf sites to larger forces affecting the town. ―From Quiet Woods to Tide Kissed Shore:‖ Searching for the Colonial Port of Sunbury, Georgia . A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Department of History East Carolina University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Masters of Arts in History by Stephen D. Dilk April, 2012 © (Stephen Dilk, 2012) ―From Quiet Woods to Tide Kissed Shore:‖ Searching for the Colonial Port of Sunbury, Georgia by Stephen D. Dilk APPROVED BY: DIRECTOR OF THESIS __________________________________________________ Nathan Richards, Ph. D. COMMITTEE MEMBER __________________________________________________ Wade Dudley, Ph.D. COMMITTEE MEMBER _________________________________________________ Lynn Harris, Ph.D. COMMITTEE MEMBER_________________________________________________ Christopher McCabe, M.A. CHAIR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY _____________________________ Gerald J. Prokopowicz , Ph.D. DEAN OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL ______________________________________ Paul Gemperline, Ph.D. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS When going through the pages of this thesis, it is easy to be reminded of my indebtedness to a great number of people. Indeed, first I have to thank Nathan Richards, my director whose guidance, leadership, and Jacob Marley-esque presence motivated me until the end (kidding about the Marley part). I also have to acknowledge the tremendous assistance given to me from my other faculty committee members, Wade Dudley and Lynn Harris. Their input helped in a great many ways to enrich the final product. I would also be remiss if I did not thank Christopher McCabe who made most of this project possible. His constant encouragement, input, and advice proved invaluable. Additionally, I also have to thank David Crass for helping fund the Georgia Coastal Underwater Archaeology Field Station and whose vision and leadership through the recession has kept maritime archaeologists working on the state level in Georgia. Thanks also have to go out to my family for supporting me in a plethora of ways. Other vital support came from various people across several states and countries, including Martha Zierdon in Charleston, South Carolina, who graciously aided me in ceramic identification, Arthur Edgar, site manager at Fort Morris State Historic Site, in Sunbury, Georgia who let us stay on site and whose enthusiasm about the project is contagious, Franklin Price in Tallahassee, Florida for reading and correcting my thesis, Calvin Mires and Mark Keusenkothen in Greenville, North Carolina for their help and joviality, Alexander Kaderbhai and company for letting me crash in their London flat for a week and a day, and Jessica Bilas Langer for being my toughest critic and most ardent supporter. I would also like to thank Brian Rodgers for his help with the drawings. Lastly, I need to acknowledge the unsung heroes of this endeavor, the interlibrary loan and distance education librarians who tirelessly strove to support me even though I was two states away when writing most of the thesis. To this end, thank you to Thomas Rowe, William Gee, Jackie Cannon, Suzanne Metcalf, and Lynda Werdel. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES AND GRAPHS …………………………………………………....... ix LIST OF FIGURES………………………………………………………………………. x CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………. 1 Introduction………………………………………………………………………. 1 Archaeological Definitions…………….…………….………………………….. 3 Broad Influences Affecting Sunbury…………………………………...……….. 5 Research Questions…...…………………………………………………….......... 6 Research Design………………………………………………………………….. 8 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………... 9 CHAPTER TWO: THEORETICAL APPROACHES…………………………………… 11 Introduction………………………………………………………………………. 11 Abandonment and Other Site Formation Processes………..…………………….. 12 Definition of the Atlantic World………………..………………………………… 16 World-Systems Theory……………………..…………………………………….. 18 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………... 22 CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY………………………………………………… 23 Introduction………………………………………………………………………. 23 Archival Research………………………………………………………………... 23 Previous Historical Research…………………………………………….. 24 J.Y. Joyner Library……………………………………………………….. 25 Ruppé Library…………………………………………………………….. 25 River Campus Library…………………………………………………….. 26 Hargrett Rare Book and Manuscript Library…………………………….. 26 State Archives in Georgia………………………………………………... 26 Georgia Coastal Underwater Archaeology Field Station……………….... 27 State Archives……………………………………………………………. 27 Georgia Historical Society……………………………………………….. 27 National Archives………………………………………………………… 28 International Archives……………………………………………………. 28 Past Archaeological Research………………....…………………………………. 29 Problems with Primary Source Material…………………………………………. 32 Archaeological Fieldwork………………………………………………………... 32 Community Property Lot Artifact Assemblage Analysis……………………….... 35 Analysis…………………………………………………………………………... 37 CHAPTER FOUR: HISTORY OF SUNBURY………………………………………….. 38 Introduction……………………………………………………………………….. 38 Founding and Colonization……………………………………………………..… 38 Port Development…………………..…………………………………………….. 45 Trade Networks…………………………..………………………………………. 49 The Ravages of War ………………………..……………………………………. 53 Decline of the Seaport 1783-1824…………...…………………………………… 54 Natural Disasters……………………….…………………………………………. 60 Conclusion………………………………...………………………………………. 63 CHAPTER FIVE: RESULTS OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY……………………. 65 Introduction……………………………………………………………………….. 65 Remote Sensing Survey…………………………………………………………... 68 . Investigations at Lamotte‘s Wharf South (9LI1908)……………………………... 68 Artifacts and Site Formation Processes Observed at 9LI1908……………………. 79 9LI1909: Fisher, Jones, and Hughes Wharf………………………………………. 84 Artifacts and Site Formation Processes Observed at 9LI1909……………………. 90 9LI2013: Darling and Co. Wharf…………………………………………………. 92 9LI2039: Kelsall and Spalding‘s Wharf………………………………………….. 97 Community Property Lot House Site…………………………………………….. 99 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………... 101 CHAPTER SIX: ANALYSIS…………………………………………………………….. 105 Introduction………………………………………………………………….......... 105 Integrating Sunbury into the Expanding World System………………………...... 106 Functional Analysis of Sunbury………………………………………………….. 113 Core Like Processes in Sunbury-Shipbuilding…………………………………… 115 Peripheral Production in Sunbury: Rice, Lumber, Naval Stores……………......... 115 Artifact Assemblage Analysis: Evidence of the World System………………….. 118 Wharf Constructions as Indicators of Economic Change……………………….... 126 Comparative Analysis…………………………………………………………….. 128 Wharf Sites Reflecting Economic Status…………………………………………. 131 Environmental Considerations for Wharf Construction………………………….. 139 Decline and Abandonment of Sunbury as a Port…………………………………. 145 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………... 149 CHAPTER SEVEN: CONCLUSION…………………...……………………………….. 151 Introduction……………………………………………………………………….. 151 Observations……………………………………………………………………… 152 Limitations and Future Research…………………………………………………. 155 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………... 157 REFERENCES CITED………………………………....………………………………… 159 APPENDIX A: ARTIFACTS RECOVERED FROM SITE 9LI1908................................. 175 APPENDIX B: ARTIFACTS RECOVERED FROM SITE 9LI1909................................. 176 APPENDIX C: COMMUNITY PROPERTY LOT ARTIFACT ASSEMBLAGE............. 177 LIST OF TABLES AND GRAPHS Table 6.1: Artifact patterning comparisons……………………………………………… 124 Graph 6.2: Size of vessels entering and leaving Sunbury 1763-1767 ……………………. 133 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1: Map of Georgia showing Sunbury, GA………………………………………. 1 Figure 3.1: Chart illustrating coverage area of survey completed by Tidewater Atlantic… 30 Figure 3.2: Dan Elliott‘s terrestrial survey loci…….…………………………………….. 31 Figure 4.1: Jones Map showing colonial Sunbury………………………………………... 41 Figure 4.2: Detail from Part of the Coast of Georgia with the Savannah River………...... 47 Figure 4.3: 1787 Shipping List…………………………………………………..……….. 58 Figure 4.4: Advertisement for rice shipments to Sunbury ……………………………….. 59 Figure 5.1: Aerial image of Sunbury showing site locations……………………………... 66 Figure 5.2: Side Scan Sonar Remote Sensing Survey Coverage ………………………… 69 Figure 5.3: 9LI1908 Overlaid on the Jones Map…………………………………………. 70 Figure 5.4: 9LI1908 Site plan……………………………………………………………… 72 Figure 5.5: Excavated Piling analysis…………………………………………………….. 74 Figure 5.6: Piling and Puncheon clustering………………………………………………. 77 Figure 5.7: Image of 9LI1908…………………………………………………………….. 78 Figure 5.8: 9LI1908 image artifacts………………………………………………………. 81 Figure 5.9: 9LI1909 site location and Jones Map overlap………………………………… 85 Figure 5.10: Isometric drawing of 9LI1909………………………………………………. 88 Figure 5.11: Site GR SR-22 showing a blown out bulkhead and abandoned vessel……… 89 Figure 5.12: Similarities
Recommended publications
  • Georgia Historical Society Educator Web Guide
    Georgia Historical Society Educator Web Guide Guide to the educational resources available on the GHS website Theme driven guide to: Online exhibits Biographical Materials Primary sources Classroom activities Today in Georgia History Episodes New Georgia Encyclopedia Articles Archival Collections Historical Markers Updated: July 2014 Georgia Historical Society Educator Web Guide Table of Contents Pre-Colonial Native American Cultures 1 Early European Exploration 2-3 Colonial Establishing the Colony 3-4 Trustee Georgia 5-6 Royal Georgia 7-8 Revolutionary Georgia and the American Revolution 8-10 Early Republic 10-12 Expansion and Conflict in Georgia Creek and Cherokee Removal 12-13 Technology, Agriculture, & Expansion of Slavery 14-15 Civil War, Reconstruction, and the New South Secession 15-16 Civil War 17-19 Reconstruction 19-21 New South 21-23 Rise of Modern Georgia Great Depression and the New Deal 23-24 Culture, Society, and Politics 25-26 Global Conflict World War One 26-27 World War Two 27-28 Modern Georgia Modern Civil Rights Movement 28-30 Post-World War Two Georgia 31-32 Georgia Since 1970 33-34 Pre-Colonial Chapter by Chapter Primary Sources Chapter 2 The First Peoples of Georgia Pages from the rare book Etowah Papers: Exploration of the Etowah site in Georgia. Includes images of the site and artifacts found at the site. Native American Cultures Opening America’s Archives Primary Sources Set 1 (Early Georgia) SS8H1— The development of Native American cultures and the impact of European exploration and settlement on the Native American cultures in Georgia. Illustration based on French descriptions of Florida Na- tive Americans.
    [Show full text]
  • Rule 391-3-6-.03. Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Rule 391-3-6-.03. Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards ( 1) Purpose. The establishment of water quality standards. (2) W ate r Quality Enhancement: (a) The purposes and intent of the State in establishing Water Quality Standards are to provide enhancement of water quality and prevention of pollution; to protect the public health or welfare in accordance with the public interest for drinking water supplies, conservation of fish, wildlife and other beneficial aquatic life, and agricultural, industrial, recreational, and other reasonable and necessary uses and to maintain and improve the biological integrity of the waters of the State. ( b) The following paragraphs describe the three tiers of the State's waters. (i) Tier 1 - Existing instream water uses and the level of water quality necessary to protect the existing uses shall be maintained and protected. (ii) Tier 2 - Where the quality of the waters exceed levels necessary to support propagation of fish, shellfish, and wildlife and recreation in and on the water, that quality shall be maintained and protected unless the division finds, after full satisfaction of the intergovernmental coordination and public participation provisions of the division's continuing planning process, that allowing lower water quality is necessary to accommodate important economic or social development in the area in which the waters are located.
    [Show full text]
  • TABBY: the ENDURING BUILDING MATERIAL of COASTAL GEORGIA by TAYLOR P. DAVIS (Under Direction of Dr. Reinberger)
    TABBY: THE ENDURING BUILDING MATERIAL OF COASTAL GEORGIA by TAYLOR P. DAVIS (Under direction of Dr. Reinberger) ABSTRACT Tabby is a unique building material found along the coast of the Southeastern United States. This material is all that remains above grade of many past coastal cultures and illustrates much of the history of Coastal Georgia. In this master’s thesis, I present the following areas of research: 1) an explanation of the history and origins of the different generations of tabby, 2) a list of historical tabby sites that I feel are pertinent to its history and cultural significance, and 3) the production of samples of tabby through historical means and the analysis of their compressive strength. With these three concentrations of study, I am able to compile new information on this culturally significant building material. INDEX WORDS: Tabby, Coquina, Limekiln, Limerick, Oglethorpe, Thomas Spalding, Oglethorpe Tabby, Military Tabby, Spalding Tabby, Tabby Revival, Pseudo Tabby, Fort Frederica, St. Augustine, McIntosh County, Glynn County, Camden County TABBY: THE ENDURING BUILDING MATERIAL OF COASTAL GEORGIA by TAYLOR P. DAVIS B.F.A., The University of Georgia, 2006 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Historic Preservation Athens, Georgia 2011 © 2011 TAYLOR P. DAVIS ALL RIGHTS RESERVED TABBY: THE ENDURING BUILDING MATERIAL OF COASTAL GEORGIA by TAYLOR P. DAVIS Major Professor: Mark Reinberger Committee: Wayde Brown Larry Millard Scott Messer Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia December 2011 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In this section, I would like to acknowledge the people who have helped me with this project: my mother and father for their patience, support, and advice; my in-laws for them graciously allowing me to use their property for my experimentation and for their advice; my sister for her technical support; Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Georgia Coast Saltwater Paddle Trail
    2010 The Georgia Coast Saltwater Paddle Trail This project was funded in part by the Coastal Management Program of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, and the U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management (OCRM), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) grant award #NA09NOS4190171, as well as the National Park Service Rivers, Trails & Conservation Assistance Program. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of OCRM or NOAA. September 30, 2010 0 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Coastal Georgia Regional Development Center Project Team .......................................................... 3 Planning and Government Services Staff ................................................................................................... 3 Geographic Information Systems Staff ....................................................................................................... 3 Economic Development Staff .......................................................................................................................... 3 Administrative Services Staff .......................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Page 574 TITLE 33—NAVIGATION and NAVIGABLE WATERS § 1804
    § 1804 TITLE 33—NAVIGATION AND NAVIGABLE WATERS Page 574 SHORT TITLE (11) Gulf Intracoastal Waterway: From St. For short title of title II of Pub. L. 95–502 as the ‘‘In- Mark’s River, Florida, to Brownsville, Texas, land Waterways Revenue Act of 1978’’, see section 201 of 1,134.5 miles. Pub. L. 95–502, set out as a Short Title of 1978 Amend- (12) Illinois Waterway (Calumet-Sag Chan- ment note under section 1 of Title 26, Internal Revenue nel): From the junction of the Illinois River Code. with the Mississippi River RM 0 to Chicago § 1804. Inland and intracoastal waterways of the Harbor at Lake Michigan, approximately RM United States 350. (13) Kanawha River: From junction with For purposes of section 4042 of title 26 (relat- Ohio River at RM 0 to RM 90.6 at Deepwater, ing to tax on fuel used in commercial transpor- West Virginia. tation on inland waterways) and for purposes of (14) Kaskaskia River: From junction with 1 section 1802 of this title, the following inland the Mississippi River at RM 0 to RM 36.2 at and intracoastal waterways of the United States Fayetteville, Illinois. are described in this section: (15) Kentucky River: From junction with (1) Alabama-Coosa Rivers: From junction Ohio River at RM 0 to confluence of Middle with the Tombigbee River at river mile (here- and North Forks at RM 258.6. inafter referred to as RM) 0 to junction with (16) Lower Mississippi River: From Baton Coosa River at RM 314. (2) Allegheny River: From confluence with Rouge, Louisiana, RM 233.9 to Cairo, Illinois, the Monongahela River to form the Ohio River RM 953.8.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH CAROLINA 2020 DRAFT 303(D) LIST Upper Broad Broad River Basin
    NORTH CAROLINA 2020 DRAFT 303(D) LIST Upper Broad Broad River Basin AU Name AU Number Classification AU_LengthArea AU_Units AU ID Description Broad River Basin 03050105 Upper Broad BROAD RIVER 9-(22)a C 1.8 FW Miles 12499 From Carolina Mountain Power Company to US 64/74 Benthos (Nar, AL, FW) 5 Exceeding Criteria Fair, Poor or Severe Bioclassification 2008 BROAD RIVER 9-(22)b1 C 6.3 FW Miles 13396 From US 64/74 to Cove Creek Benthos (Nar, AL, FW) 5 Exceeding Criteria Fair, Poor or Severe Bioclassification 2008 Cleghorn Creek 9-26-(0.75) C 1.5 FW Miles 13295 From 90 meters south of Baber Road to the Broad River Benthos (Nar, AL, FW) 5 Exceeding Criteria Fair, Poor or Severe Bioclassification 2008 Catheys Creek 9-41-13-(6)b C 1.9 FW Miles 12701 From confluence with Hollands Creek to S. Broad R. Fish Community (Nar, AL, FW) 5 Exceeding Criteria Fair, Poor or Severe Bioclassification 1998 Mill Creek 9-41-13-3 WS-V 4.5 FW Miles 12705 From source to Catheys Creek Benthos (Nar, AL, FW) 5 Exceeding Criteria Fair, Poor or Severe Bioclassification 2008 Hollands Creek 9-41-13-7-(3) C 2.2 FW Miles 12709 From Case Branch to Catheys Creek Fish Community (Nar, AL, FW) 5 Exceeding Criteria Fair, Poor or Severe Bioclassification 1998 Sandy Run Creek 9-46-(1) WS-IV 10.4 FW Miles 13221 From source to a point approximately 0.7 mile upstream of SR 1168 Fish Community (Nar, AL, FW) 5 Exceeding Criteria Fair, Poor or Severe Bioclassification 2018 Hinton Creek 9-50-15 C 13.2 FW Miles 12777 From source to First Broad River Benthos (Nar, AL, FW) 5 Exceeding Criteria
    [Show full text]
  • Page 551 TITLE 33—NAVIGATION and NAVIGABLE WATERS § 1804
    Page 551 TITLE 33—NAVIGATION AND NAVIGABLE WATERS § 1804 Pub. L. 95–502, set out as a Short Title of 1978 Amend- (12) Illinois Waterway (Calumet-Sag Chan- ment note under section 1 of Title 26, Internal Revenue nel): From the junction of the Illinois River Code. with the Mississippi River RM 0 to Chicago § 1804. Inland and intracoastal waterways of the Harbor at Lake Michigan, approximately RM United States 350. (13) Kanawha River: From junction with For purposes of section 4042 of title 26 (relat- Ohio River at RM 0 to RM 90.6 at Deepwater, ing to tax on fuel used in commercial transpor- West Virginia. tation on inland waterways) and for purposes of (14) Kaskaskia River: From junction with section 1802 1 of this title, the following inland the Mississippi River at RM 0 to RM 36.2 at and intracoastal waterways of the United States Fayetteville, Illinois. are described in this section: (15) Kentucky River: From junction with (1) Alabama-Coosa Rivers: From junction Ohio River at RM 0 to confluence of Middle with the Tombigbee River at river mile (here- and North Forks at RM 258.6. inafter referred to as RM) 0 to junction with (16) Lower Mississippi River: From Baton Coosa River at RM 314. Rouge, Louisiana, RM 233.9 to Cairo, Illinois, (2) Allegheny River: From confluence with RM 953.8. the Monongahela River to form the Ohio River at RM 0 to the head of the existing project at (17) Upper Mississippi River: From Cairo, Il- East Brady, Pennsylvania, RM 72.
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement Patterns of the Geechee at Sapelo Island Georgia, from 1860 to 1950
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School March 2021 Our Story, Our Homeland, Our Legacy: Settlement Patterns of The Geechee at Sapelo Island Georgia, From 1860 To 1950 Colette D. Witcher University of South Florida Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Scholar Commons Citation Witcher, Colette D., "Our Story, Our Homeland, Our Legacy: Settlement Patterns of The Geechee at Sapelo Island Georgia, From 1860 To 1950" (2021). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/8889 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Our Story, Our Homeland, Our Legacy: Settlement Patterns of the Geechee at Sapelo Island Georgia, From 1860 To 1950 by Colette D. Witcher A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts with a concentration in Archaeology Department of Anthropology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Thomas J. Pluckhahn, Ph.D. Antoinette T. Jackson, Ph.D. Diane Wallman. Ph.D. Date of Approval: March 10, 2021 Keywords: Historical Archaeology, African-American Archaeology, Post-Emancipation Archaeology, Anarchist Archaeological Theory Copyright © 2021, Colette D. Witcher ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my committee members Dr. Thomas J. Pluckhahn, Dr. Antoinette T. Jackson, and Dr. Diane Wallman. I thank Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Distances Between United States Ports 2019 (13Th) Edition
    Distances Between United States Ports 2019 (13th) Edition T OF EN CO M M T M R E A R P C E E D U N A I C T I E R D E S M T A ATES OF U.S. Department of Commerce Wilbur L. Ross, Jr., Secretary of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) RDML Timothy Gallaudet., Ph.D., USN Ret., Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere and Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere National Ocean Service Nicole R. LeBoeuf, Deputy Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal Zone Management Cover image courtesy of Megan Greenaway—Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI III Preface Distances Between United States Ports is published by the Office of Coast Survey, National Ocean Service (NOS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), pursuant to the Act of 6 August 1947 (33 U.S.C. 883a and b), and the Act of 22 October 1968 (44 U.S.C. 1310). Distances Between United States Ports contains distances from a port of the United States to other ports in the United States, and from a port in the Great Lakes in the United States to Canadian ports in the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River. Distances Between Ports, Publication 151, is published by National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) and distributed by NOS. NGA Pub. 151 is international in scope and lists distances from foreign port to foreign port and from foreign port to major U.S. ports. The two publications, Distances Between United States Ports and Distances Between Ports, complement each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Street & Number East Side of the Island Ownership of Property
    RECEIVED 2280 NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service II "'I :»"• 5^^%,IQQfi NATIONAL REGISTER OF '. ISTRATION FORM This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in "Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms" (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. l. Name of Property historic name HOG HAMMOCK HISTORIC DISTRICT other names/site number N/A _ street & number East side of the island city/ town Sapelo Island (N/A) vicinity of county Mclntosh code GA 191 state Georgia code GA zip code 31327 (N/A) not for publication 3. Classification Ownership of Property: (X) private ( ) public-local (X) public-state ( ) public-federal Category of Property ( ) building(s) (X) district ( ) site ( ) structure ( ) object Number of Resources within Property! Contributing Noncontributinq buildings 59 47 sites 5 0 structures 16 0 objects 0 0 total 80 47 Contributing resources previously listed in the National Register: N/A Name of related multiple property listing: N/A 4. State/Federal Agency certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Zebra Mussel Assessment in 1997 That Has Served Figure 1
    Zebra Mussels in South Carolina: The Potential Risk of Infestation by Steven de Kozlowski and Chris Page S.C. Department of Natural Resources and Jack Whetstone Clemson University S.C. Sea Grant Consortium This report was initiated by the South Carolina Zebra Mussel Task Force and supported by CLEMSON South Carolina Department of Natural Resources E X T E N S I O N South Carolina Sea Grant Consortium and Clemson University Jointly funded by the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, the South Carolina Sea Grant Consortium and Clemson University 2002 The South Carolina Department of Natural Resources prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, gender, national origin, religion, disability or age. Direct all inquiries to the Office of Human Resources, PO Box 167, Columbia, SC 29202. Total Copies - 300 • Total Cost - $2,417 • Cost per Copy - $8.00 02WR3607 SOUTH CAROLINA ZEBRA MUSSEL TASK FORCE Steve de Kozlowski - S.C. Department of Natural Resources, Co-chair Rick DeVoe - S.C. Sea Grant Consortium, Co-chair Butch Younginer - S.C. Department of Health & Environmental Control Reese Edwards - S.C. Governor’s Office John Inabinet - S.C. Public Service Authority Larry Setzler - S.C. Ports Authority Robin Socha - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Charleston) Bill Bailey - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Savannah) Ed EuDaly - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Chuck Jennings - U.S. Coast Guard Cam Ferguson - Greenville Water System Andrew Fairey - Charleston Commissioners of Public Works Eddie Dearybury - Spartanburg Water System Bud Summers - City of Columbia Arnie Gnilka - Duke Power Company John Pearrow - S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 BOURBON FIELD: PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS of a BARRIER ISLAND PLANTATION SITE, SAPELO ISLAND, GEORGIA by Rachel Laura Devan
    BOURBON FIELD: PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS OF A BARRIER ISLAND PLANTATION SITE, SAPELO ISLAND, GEORGIA by Rachel Laura DeVan Perrine B.A., The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, 2008 A thesis submitted to the Department of Anthropology College of Arts and Sciences The University of West Florida In partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts 2012 The thesis of Rachel Laura DeVan Perrine is approved: ____________________________________________ _______________________ Norma J. Harris, M.A., Committee Member Date ____________________________________________ _______________________ George B. Ellenberg, Ph.D., Committee Member Date ____________________________________________ _______________________ David C. Crass, Ph.D., Committee Member Date ____________________________________________ _______________________ John E. Worth, Ph.D., Committee Chair Date Accepted for the Department/Division: ____________________________________________ _______________________ John R. Bratten, Ph.D., Chair Date Accepted for the University: ____________________________________________ _______________________ Richard S. Podemski, Ph.D., Dean, Graduate School Date DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my late grandma, Dorothy Ore, who was supportive and enthusiastic about my decision to pursue a career in archaeology and whose zest for life and positive attitude will always be an inspiration to me. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Over the course of my thesis work, I have been very fortunate in having help through every stage of the project. I could not have completed my thesis without the assistance and support of those individuals who lent a hand along the way and I would like to take this opportunity to express my gratitude. First of all, I would like to thank my UWF thesis committee members, Norma Harris, John Worth, and George Ellenberg for their guidance and help during the various phases of my research.
    [Show full text]