Student Learning Assessment Report: Spring 2018

Student Learning Assessment

Report:

Spring 2018

Contents Spring 2018 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA Program ...... 3 Spring 2018 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in HRM Program ...... 22 Spring 2018 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in International Business (“INB”) ...... 32 Spring 2018 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in MIS Program ...... 42 Spring 2018 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in Marketing (“MKT”) ...... 52 Spring 2018 Student Learning Assessment Report: BS in Economics ...... 62 Spring 2018 Student Learning Assessment Report: MS in Economics ...... 71 Spring 2018 Student Learning Assessment Report: Master of Business Administration ...... 76 Spring 2018 Student Learning Assessment Report: Executive Master of Business Administration ...... 87

Spring 2018 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA Program (Common Program Learning Goals and Student Learning Outcomes for all BBA Disciplines)

Program Student Learning Learning Goal Outcome Measure Measurement Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 1. Communications 1.1 Communicate Summative: Exit Exit Assessment Test: See Target: 80% of students should PowerPoint presentations and in class ideas and Assessment Test, and Meets Expectation: 60% Figures meet or exceed expectation. debates are included in many courses arguments Course Embedded to 80%; Does Not Meet BBA to teach students how to Students met the target. effectively Assessment (MGT Expectation < 60%; Core 1 – communicate their ideas effectively. 489, integrative Exceeds Expectation > 4. Trend: Students performance has capstone course group 80% improved in formative assessment term projects). over the period. Formative: Course Course-Embedded Embedded Assessment: Rubric # Assessment(MGT 368 B.1.1.1.1 group term projects)

BBA Core PLG 1,SLO 1.1; Spring 2018; Summative BBA Core PLG 1, SLO 1.1; Summative; Trend M = Meets Expectations, D = Does Not Meet Expectations, E = Exceeds Expectations 100 100 75.86 80 69.64 67.9 80 67.9 60

60 40 16.54 19.86 16.59 13.83 12.25

40 20 7.56 Percentage of Percentage Students 19.86 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 12.25 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure BBA Core- 1 Figure BBA Core- 2

BBA Core PLG 1, SLO 1.1; Spring 2018; Formative BBA Core PLG 1, SLO 1.1; Formative; Trend M = Meets Expectations, D = Does Not Meet Expectations, E = Exceeds Expectations 100 100 80 73.96 62.2 62.2 80 73.96 60 37.8 37.8 60 40 26.04

40 20

26.04 of Percentage Students 0 0 0 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 0 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure BBA Core- 3 Figure BBA Core- 4

Program Student Learning Learning Goal Outcome Measure Measurement Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 2. Critical 2.1 Summative: Exit Assessment Test, Exit Assessment Test: Meets See Figures Target: 70% students NSU student affairs in association with Thinking Correctly and Course Embedded Assessment Expectation: 60% to 80%; Does BBA Core 5 should meet or exceed various student clubs organize different apply (MGT 489, integrative capstone Not Meet Expectation < 60%; – 6. expectations. competitions for students to give them the foundation course group term projects). Exceeds Expectation > 80% Please see platform to apply their theoretical Students have met the knowledge Formative: Course Embedded Course-Embedded Assessment: the knowledge into practice. target. gained in Assessment from the Disciplines: Rubric # 2.1.1.1 (summative ); following BBA core FIN 435 group term projects for A&F.4.R.2 for A&F students, figures for Trend: The percentage courses A&F students; HRM 480 group rubric # HRM.3.R.1 for HRM the of students exceeding for terms projects for HRM students; students, rubric # INB.2.R.1 for formative expectation has analysis INB 480 group term projects for INB students, rubric # results: increased over the and INB students; MIS 470 group term MIS.2.R.1 for MIS students, A&F-13, period showing an decision projects for MIS students; and rubric # MKT.1.R.2 for MKT HRM-9, improvement in this making MKT 460 group term projects for students (formative) INB-5, MIS- area. MKT students 5, MKT-1

BBA Core PLG 2, SLO 2.1; Spring 2018; Summative BBA Core PLG 2, SLO 2.1; Summative; Trend M = Meets Expectations, D = Does Not Meet Expectations, E = Exceeds Expectations 100 100 80 65.39 63.14 80 60 45.73 36.75 38.75 60 40 45.73 23.11 38.75 15.53 40 20 11.51

Percentage of Percentage Students 0.13 0 20 15.53 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure BBA Core- 5 Figure BBA Core- 6

Program Learning Student Learning Measurement Goal Outcome Measure Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 2. Critical Thinking 2.2. Engage in Summative: Exit Exit Assessment See Target: 60% students The in-class learning of students is critical thinking and Assessment Test, and Test: Meets Figures should meet or exceed augmented with industry engagement. Class analysis of business Course Embedded Expectation: 60% to BBA expectation. projects include real life business problems. phenomena to realize Assessment (MGT 80%; Does Not Meet Core 7 – Students met the target. opportunities for 489, integrative Expectation < 60%; 10. performance capstone course Exceeds Expectation Trend: Students improvement at all group term projects). > 80% performance has improved levels over the period. In Formative: Course Course-Embedded formative assessment there Embedded Assessment: Rubric is a tremendous Assessment(MGT # B.2.2.1.1 improvement in students‟ 368 group term performance with a high projects) percentage of students meeting the expectation.

BBA Core PLG 2, SLO 2.2; Spring 2018; Summative BBA Core PLG 2, SLO 2.2; Summative; Trend M = Meets Expectations, D = Does Not Meet Expectations, E = Exceeds Expectations 90 82.88 100 80 70 56.22 80 60 50 45.81 35.42 60 56.22 40 30 22.45 21.33 16.39 18.78 20 40

Percentage of Percentage Students 10 0.74 22.45 21.33 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure BBA Core- 7 Figure BBA Core- 8

BBA Core PLG 2, SLO 2.2; Spring 2018; Formative BBA Core PLG 2, SLO 2.2; Formative; Trend M = Meets Expectations, D = Does Not Meet Expectations, E = Exceeds Expectations 100 100 80.21 80 71.95 71.95 80.21 80 60

60 40

20 14.63 14.63 13.41 13.41 14.58

40 5.21 Percentage of Percentage Students 0 20 14.58 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 5.21

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure BBA Core- 9 Figure BBA Core- 10

Program Learning Student Learning Measurement Goal Outcome Measure Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 3. Integration 3.1 Utilize knowledge Summative: Exit Exit Assessment See Target: 80% students should A number of grooming sessions were in the areas of Assessment Test, and Test: Meets Figures meet or exceed expectation. organized by several SBE co-curricular accounting, Course-Embedded Expectation 60% to BBA organizations. These grooming sessions management, finance, Assessment (MGT 80%; Does Not Meet Core 11 Students have met the target featured industry leaders and experts. and marketing as 489, integrative Expectation < 60%, – 14. in summative assessment but These events provided key information business capstone course, Exceeds Expectation failed to meet the target in about the current business landscapes as professionals. group term projects) > 80% formative assessment. well as future issues. Formative: Course- Course-Embedded Embedded Assessment: Rubric Trend: Student performance Assessment(MGT # 3.1.1.1 is showing a positive trend in 368 group term summative assessment with projects) increase in percentage of students exceeding expectation. Although students failed to meet the target in formative assessment, there is also a positive trend in students‟ performance.

BBA Core PLG 3, SLO 3.1; Spring 2018; Summative BBA Core PLG 3, SLO 3.1; Summative; Trend M = Meets Expectations, D = Does Not Meet Expectations, E = Exceeds Expectations 100 100 80 66.44 80 57.08 60 57.08 37.82 60 40 35.29 24.29 26.9 22.34 18.64 40 20 11.23 24.29 of Percentage Students 18.64 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure BBA Core- 11 Figure BBA Core- 12 8

BBA Core PLG 3, SLO 3.1; Spring 2018; Formative BBA Core PLG 3, SLO 3.1; Formative; Trend M = Meets Expectations, D = Does Not Meet Expectations, E = Exceeds Expectations 100 100 80 62.2 62.2 80 60 52.08

60 52.08 40 26.04 25.61 25.61 21.88 12.2 12.2 40 20

26.04 of Percentage Students 21.88 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure BBA Core- 13 Figure BBA Core- 14

Program Student Learning Learning Measure Measurement Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop Goal Outcome 3. Integration 3.2 Utilize Summative: Exit Assessment Exit Assessment Test: Meets See Figures Target: 60% students Google Business Groups (GBG) the latest Test, and Course-Embedded Expectation: 60% to 80%; BBA Core should meet or exceed Sonargaon in partnership with North South business Assessment (MGT 489, Does Not Meet Expectation < 15 – 16. expectation. University organized “GDay 2018 tools to integrative capstone course, group 60%; Exceeds Expectation > Bangladesh: Entrepreneurial success Please see analyze term projects) 80% Students failed to meet through technology and leadership skills” the information, the target. at North South University on February 10, Formative: Course Embedded Course-Embedded following to improve 2018. The day long program consisted of Assessment from the Disciplines: Assessment: Rubric # 3.2.1.1 figures for productivity Trend: Students have several sessions taken by a panel of very FIN 435 group term projects for (summative ); A&F.4.R.2 for the and been failing to meet the inspirational speakers from the industry. A&F students; HRM 480 group A&F students, rubric # formative decision- target in this area for the terms projects for HRM students; HRM.3.R.1 for HRM results: making, and last two periods with an INB 480 group term projects for students, rubric # INB.2.R.1 A&F-13, to achieve increasing trend in INB students; MIS 470 group for INB students, rubric # HRM-9, performance percentage of students term projects for MIS students; MIS.2.R.1 for MIS students, INB-5, targets not meeting the and MKT 460 group term projects rubric # MKT.1.R.2 for MKT MIS-5, efficiently expectations. This is an for MKT students students (formative) MKT-1 area of concern.

BBA Core PLG 3, SLO 3.2; Spring 2018; Summative BBA Core PLG 3, SLO 3.2; Summative; Trend M = Meets Expectations, D = Does Not Meet Expectations, E = Exceeds Expectations 100 100 80 70.63 80 57.53 60 57.53 39.54 60 40 35.47 28.52 24.99 27.13 15.35 40 20

27.13 of Percentage Students 0.86 0 20 15.35 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure BBA Core- 15 Figure BBA Core- 16

Program Learning Student Learning Measurement Measure Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop Goal Outcome Criteria 4. Ethics 4.1 Uphold ethical Summative: Exit Exit Assessment See Target: 80% students should meet or Office of External Affairs standards in every Assessment Test, and Test: Meets Figures exceed expectation. organized a session where Mr. professional practice Course-Embedded Expectation 60% to BBA Mahbubul Hasan, President of Assessment (MGT 80%; Does Not Meet Core 17 - Students failed to meet the target the Graduate Student 489, integrative Expectation < 60%, 18 Association at the University of capstone course, Exceeds Expectation Trend: Students are constantly failing Memphis, Tennessee talked group term projects) > 80% about Culture, Ethics and to meet the target in this area. This is an Course-Embedded Practices in U.S. Graduate area of major concern. Assessment: Rubric Level Studies. # 4.1.1.1

BBA Core PLG 4, SLO 4.1; Spring 2018; Summative BBA Core PLG 4, SLO 4.1; Summative; Trend M = Meets Expectations, D = Does Not Meet Expectations, E = Exceeds Expectations 100 100 80 68.25 65.68 63.41 80 65.68 60

60 40 27.27 27.21 21.6 20 15 40 4.49 7.12 27.21 of Percentage Students 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 7.12 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure BBA Core- 17 Figure BBA Core- 18

Spring 2018 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in Accounting and Finance

Student Learning Measurement Measure Results Observation(s) Closing the Loop Outcome Criteria A&F.1. Identify and Summative: - Exit Exit Assessment Test See Figures Target: 80% students should meet or, exceed Deployment of standardized assessment tools classify financial Assessment Test, and Meets Expectation: A&F 1 – 4. expectation. was continued. The in-class learning of information; present Course Embedded 60% -80% students was augmented with industry and interpret financial Assessment (FIN 440, Does Not Meet Students met the target. engagement. statements Capstone Course Expectation < 60% group term projects) Exceeds Expectation> Trend: There is an increasing trend in the 80% percentage of students meeting expectations. Formative: Course Embedded- Course-Embedded Assessment (FIN 254 Assessment: Rubric # group term projects) A&F.1.R.1

BBA in A&F, SLO 1, Summative, Spring 2018 BBA in A&F, SLO 1, Summative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 75.57 80 66.13 80 75.57 60 43.68 39.81 60 40 24.55 16.51 13.05

40 20 9.33 11.39 Percentage of Percentage Students 0 20 13.05 Percentage of Percentage Students 11.39 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure A&F 1 Figure A&F 2

BBA in A&F, SLO 1, Formative, Spring 2018 BBA in A&F, SLO 1, Formative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 80 80 60 51.38 50.65 41.56 43.75 40.63 60 40 32.31 43.75 40.63 16.31 15.63

40 20 7.79 Percentage of Percentage Students 0 20 15.63 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure A&F 3 Figure A&F 4

Student Learning Measurement Measure Results Observation(s) Closing the Loop Outcome Criteria A&F.2. Explain cost Summative: - Exit Exit Assessment Test See Figures Target: 80% students should meet or, exceed Course components are constantly reviewed concepts and its Assessment Test Meets Expectation: A&F 5 – 8. expectation. to ensure that students can continue to classification and 60% -80% critically identify problems and solve those apply this in Formative: Course- Does Not Meet Students met the target in summative using their knowledge of business studies. budgeting for specific Embedded Expectation < 60% assessment but not in formative assessment. business situations. Assessment (ACT Exceeds Expectation> 202 examinations) 80% Trend: Students performance in summative assessment is excellent with a high percentage Course-Embedded of students exceeding expectation. However Assessment: Rubric # performance in formative assessment is A&F.2.R.1 showing a negative picture with increase in (formative), percentage of students not meeting A&F.2.R.2 expectation. This is an area of concern and (summative) more focused should be given in this area.

BBA in A&F, SLO 2, Summative, Spring 2018 BBA in A&F, SLO 2, Summative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 99.29 100 100 79.01 80 79.01 68.32 80 60

60 40 29.7 20.99 40 20

Percentage of Percentage Students 0 0.71 1.98 0 20.99 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 0 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure A&F 5 Figure A&F 6

BBA in A&F, SLO 2, Formative, Spring 2018 BBA in A&F, SLO 2, Formative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 85.38 80 80 56.8 60 45.1 56.8 60 40 29.02 25.88 20.71 22.49 13.21 40 20

Percentage of Percentage Students 1.42 20.71 22.49 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure A&F 7 Figure A&F 8

Student Learning Measurement Measure Results Observation(s) Closing the Loop Outcome Criteria A&F.3. Be able to Summative: - Exit Exit Assessment Test See Figures Target: 80% students should meet or, North South University became the first private apply best investment Assessment Test, and Meets Expectation: A&F 9 – 12. exceed expectation. university in Bangladesh to be welcomed into the strategy by analyzing Course-Embedded 60% -80% American-based Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) various investment Assessment Does Not Meet Student met the target. Institute University Affiliation Program. The options. (FIN 440, Capstone Expectation < 60% Bachelor of Business Administration in Finance Course, group term Exceeds Expectation> Trend: Students performance in formative Program has incorporated at least 70 percent of the projects) 80% assessment has improved over the period. CFA Program Candidate Body of Knowledge and Students exhibit good performance in this placing sufficient emphasis on the CFA Institute Formative: Course- Course-Embedded area for both summative and formative Code of Ethics and Standards of Practice. Embedded Assessment: Rubric # assessment. Assessment (FIN 254 A&F.3.R.1 group term projects) (formative), A&F.3.R.2 (summative)

BBA in A&F, SLO 3, Summative, Spring 2018 BBA in A&F, SLO 3, Summative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 80 67.12 80 56.99 60 55.42 56.99 60 40 31.26 24.69 17.66 18.33 15.23 13.32 40 20 24.69 of Percentage Students 18.33 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure A&F 9 Figure A&F 10

BBA in A&F, SLO 3, Formative, Spring 2018 BBA in A&F, SLO 3, Formative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 80 80 60 51.03 49.78 53.13 43.72 60 53.13 40 34.38 26.9 22.07 20 12.5

40 34.38 6.49 Percentage of Percentage Students 0 20 12.5 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure A&F 11 Figure A&F 12

Student Learning Measurement Measure Results Observation(s) Closing the Loop Outcome Criteria A&F.4. Be able to Summative: - Exit Exit Assessment Test: See Figures Target: 70% students should meet or, Entry into the CFA Institute University Affiliation calculate and measure Assessment Test, and Meets Expectation: A&F 13 – 16. exceed expectation. Program made NSU curriculum closely tied to risks and its Course-Embedded 60% -80% professional practice and also preparing students to application in Assessment Does Not Meet Students met the target. sit for the CFA examinations. portfolio (FIN 435, Capstone Expectation < 60% management. Course, group term Exceeds Expectation> Trend: There is an increase in percentage of projects) 80% students exceeding expectations in both formative and summative assessment. Formative: Course Course-Embedded Embedded- Assessment: Rubric # Assessment (FIN 254 A&F.4.R.1 group term projects) (formative), A&F.4.R.2 (summative)

BBA in A&F, SLO 4, Summative, Spring 2018 BBA in A&F, SLO 4, Summative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 80 62.38 80 61.53 57.53 60 62.38 36.58 60 40 22.75 23 15.73 20 14.62

40 5.9 Percentage of Percentage Students 23 0 20 14.62 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure A&F 13 Figure A&F 14

BBA in A&F, SLO 4, Formative, Spring 2018 BBA in A&F, SLO 4, Formative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 80 80 60 53.13 43.97 44.16 45.45 60 53.13 34.38 40 28.34 27.69 12.5

40 34.38 20 10.39 Percentage of Percentage Students 0 20 12.5 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure A&F 15 Figure A&F 16

Student Learning Measurement Measure Results Observation(s) Closing the Loop Outcome Criteria A&F.5. Utilize Summative: - Exit Exit Assessment Test: See Figures A&F 17 – Target: 80% students should meet or, “GDay 2018 Bangladesh” organized by technology to analyze Assessment Test, and Meets Expectation: 20. exceed expectation. Google Business Groups (GBG) Sonargaon financial information Course-Embedded 60% -80% in partnership with North South University and to facilitate Assessment Does Not Meet Students met the target. consisted of a seminar on data mining accounting and (FIN 440, Capstone Expectation < 60% insights using Google technology to make financial reporting Course, group term Exceeds Expectation> Trend: We are pleased with increasing informed strategic decisions. process. projects) 80% trends in the percentage of students meeting and exceeding expectation. Formative: Course- Course-Embedded Embedded Assessment: Rubric # Assessment (FIN 254 A&F.5.R.1 group term projects)

BBA in A&F, SLO 5, Summative, Spring 2018 BBA in A&F, SLO 5, Summative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 80 80 59.58 60.42 60 52.61 37.01 60 52.61 40 24.38 23.52 37.01 15.21 16.92

40 20 10.38 Percentage of Percentage Students 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 10.38 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure A&F 17 Figure A&F 18

BBA in A&F, SLO 5, Formative, Spring 2018 BBA in A&F, SLO 5, Formative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 80 65.8 80 60 50.71 40.63 40.63 60 40 34.4 24.68 40.63 40.63 14.89 18.75

40 20 9.52 Percentage of Percentage Students 18.75 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure A&F 19 Figure A&F 20

Spring 2018 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in HRM Program Student Learning Measurement Measure Results Observation Closing the Loop Outcome Criteria 1. Understand the Summative: Exit Assessment Test: See Figures Target: 80% students should meet or exceed Course components are constantly reviewed to Human Resource Exit Assessment Test, Meets Expectation: HRM 1 – 4. expectation. ensure that students can continue to critically Management concepts and Course 60% to 80% identify problems and solve those using their and theories, and is Embedded Does Not Meet Students met the target. knowledge of business studies. able to apply these Assessment Expectation: <60% core knowledge in (HRM480 group term Exceeds Expectation: Trend: Overall the students exhibit a very managing projects) >80% good performance in the area. organizations. Formative: Course Embedded Course-Embedded Assessment Assessment: (MGT351 group term Rubric # HRM.1.R.1 projects)

BBA in HRM, SLO 1, Summative, Spring 2018 BBA in HRM, SLO 1, Summative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 89.66 100 77.14 80 77.14 80 55.56 60 44.44 60 40 22.86 40 20 10.34

Percentage of Percentage Students 0 0 0 22.86 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 0 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure HRM 1 Figure HRM 2

BBA in HRM, SLO 1, Formative, Spring 2018 BBA in HRM, SLO 1, Formative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 80 72.22 80 60 51.43 53.33 48.57 46.67 60 53.33 40 46.67 27.78

40 20

Percentage of Percentage Students 0 0 0 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 0 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure HRM 3 Figure HRM 4

Student Learning Measurement Measure Results Observation Closing the Loop Outcome Criteria 2. Understand the Summative: Exit Assessment Test: See Figures HRM 5 – Target: 75% students should meet North South University Human Resources Club concepts underlying Exit Assessment Test, Meets Expectation: 8. or exceed expectation. (NSU HRC) conducted a seminar to improve effective interpersonal and Course 60% to 80% students‟ understanding and knowledge of general relations and Embedded Does Not Meet Student met the target in both HRM issues. group/team leadership Assessment Expectation: <60% assessments. skills. (HRM480 group term Exceeds Expectation: projects) >80% Trend: Student performance has Formative: significantly improved in this area Course Embedded Course-Embedded over the last two periods with an Assessment (MGT351 Assessment: Rubric # increasing trend in the percentage group term projects) HRM.2.R.1 of students exceeding expectations.

BBA in HRM, SLO 2, Summative, Spring 2018 BBA in HRM, SLO 2, Summative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 88.57 100 88.57 75.86 80 66.67 80 60

60 40 22.22 24.14 40 20 8.57 11.11

Percentage of Percentage Students 0 2.86 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 8.57 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2.86 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure HRM 5 Figure HRM 6

BBA in HRM, SLO 2, Formative, Spring 2018 BBA in HRM, SLO 2, Formative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 77.78 80 80 60 60 51.43 60 37.14 40 60 40 22.22 40 40 20 11.43

Percentage of Percentage Students 0 0 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 0 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure HRM 7 Figure HRM 8

Student Learning Measurement Measure Results Observation Closing the Loop Outcomes Criteria 3. Understand and are Summative: Exit Assessment Test: See Figures HRM 9 – Target: 65% students should North South University Human Resources Club able to integrate Exit Assessment Test, Meets Expectation: 12. meet or exceed expectation. (NSU HRC) conducted a seminar to improve Strategic Human and Course 60% to 80% students‟ understanding and knowledge of general Resource Management Embedded Does Not Meet Students met the target. HRM issues. (“SHRM”) concepts in Assessment Expectation: <60% the context of (HRM480 group term Exceeds Expectation: Trend: Student performance is management of projects) >80% showing a positive trend with a organizations. Formative: high percentage of students Course Embedded Course Embedded exceeding expectations. Assessment (MGT351 Assessment: Rubric # group term projects) HRM.3.R.1

BBA in HRM, SLO 3, Summative, Spring 2018 BBA in HRM, SLO 3, Summative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 86.21 82.86 77.78 82.86 80 80 60

60 40 17.14 20 13.79 14.81 40 7.41

Percentage of Percentage Students 0 0 17.14 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 0 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure HRM 9 Figure HRM 10

BBA in HRM, SLO 3, Formative, Spring 2018 BBA in HRM, SLO 3, Formative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 77.14 80 80 55.56 60 53.33 40 38.89 60 53.33 40 40 20 20 40 5.56 6.67

Percentage of Percentage Students 2.86 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 6.67 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure HRM 11 Figure HRM 12

Student Learning Measurement Measure Results Observation Closing the Loop Outcome Criteria 4. Be familiar with the Summative: Exit Assessment Test: See Figures HRM 13 Target: 70% students should meet NSU Office of External Affairs (OEA) organized an application of HRM Exit Assessment Test, Meets Expectation: – 16. or exceed expectation. event called “Next Generation Leadership Program” functional capabilities and Course 60% to 80% where NSU Alumni talked about their success and to select, recruit, Embedded Does Not Meet Students met the target. leadership in their respective sectors. This event motivate, and retain Assessment Expectation: <60% was inspiring for the students as they got to learn employees. (HRM480 group term Exceeds Expectation: Trend: We are very pleased with about leadership. They also got the guidance to projects) >80% students‟ performance in this area. develop their leadership skills which will help them Formative: become successful young leaders in the future. Course Embedded Course-Embedded Assessment (MGT351 Assessment: Rubric # group term projects) HRM.4.R.1

BBA in HRM, SLO 4, Summative, Spring 2018 BBA in HRM, SLO 4, Summative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 96.55 100 100 80 68.57 62.96 80 68.57 60 37.04 60 40 31.43

40 20 31.43 3.45 Percentage of Percentage Students 0 0 0 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 0 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure HRM 13 Figure HRM 14

BBA in HRM, SLO 4, Formative, Spring 2018 BBA in HRM, SLO 4, Formative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 80 80 73.33 80 73.33 55.56 60 44.44 60 40 26.67 20 40 20

26.67 of Percentage Students 0 0 0 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 0 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure HRM 15 Figure HRM 16

Student Learning Measurement Measure Results Observation Closing the Loop Outcome Criteria 5. Demonstrate their Summative: Exit Assessment Test: See Figure HRM 17 – Target: 60% students should Introducing more interactive and up to date understanding of Exit Assessment Test, Meets Expectation: 20. meet or exceed expectation. classroom activities has enhanced students‟ compensation practices and Course 60% to 80% participation in the class. and tools of benefit in Embedded Does Not Meet Students met the target. the context of Assessment Expectation: <60% Bangladesh, and are (HRM480 group term Exceeds Expectation: Trend: Students have exhibited able to demonstrate projects) >80% good performance in summative application using Formative: assessment over the last two quantitative methods. Course Embedded Course-Embedded periods. Performance in Assessment (MGT351 Assessment: Rubric # formative assessment has also group term projects) HRM.5.R.1 improved over the period.

BBA in HRM, SLO 5, Summative, Spring 2018 BBA in HRM, SLO 5, Summative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 97.14 97.14 100 100 80 74.07 80 60

60 40 25.93

40 20

Percentage of Percentage Students 0 2.86 0 0 0 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2.86 0 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure HRM 17 Figure HRM 18

BBA in HRM, SLO 5, Formative, Spring 2018 BBA in HRM, SLO 5, Formative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 80 73.33 60 80 73.33 55.56 60 40 60 40 22.22 22.22 20 20 40 6.67

Percentage of Percentage Students 0 20 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 6.67 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure HRM 19 Figure HRM 20

Spring 2018 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in International Business (“INB”) Student Learning Measure Measurement Criteria Results Status Closing the Loop Outcomes 1. Demonstrate an Summative- Exit Exit Assessment Test: Meets See Figures Target: 80% of the students should Outreach committee of MIB understanding of global Assessment Test, and expectations- 60% to 80%, INB 1 – 4. meet and exceed the expectations department organized a seminar cultural knowledge through Course-Embedded Does Not Meet expectations- of SLO1. session where Mr. Shamim Kabir the a) the identification of major Assessment (INB 480 group < 60%, Meets expectations-> CEO of Step Footwear shared his components of international term projects) 80%. Students met the target the target experience with the students. He business and b) explanation in formative assessment but failed discussed how a firm could be of how cultural and national Formative: Course- Course-Embedded to meet it in summative internationalized and within local differences affect the Embedded Assessment (INB Assessment: Rubric # assessment. market how late comers become a key conduct of business. 372 case studies) INB.1.R.1 (formative), and player in the Footwear industry. rubric # INB.1.R.2 Trend: Students performance in Students asked him critical questions (summative) formatting assessment is regarding the importance of deteriorating over the period. This comprehending the nature of is an area of concern. “International Business” and different aspects of marketing competencies that “Step Footwear” uses for long-run profitability achievement.

BBA in INB, SLO 1, Summative, Spring 2018 BBA in INB, SLO 1, Summative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 80 80 60 46.67 50.49 40 37.75 35.3 60 50.49 40 30.5 31.75

14.22 13.34

40 35.3 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 0 20 14.22 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure INB- 1 Figure INB- 2

BBA in INB, SLO 1, Formative, Spring 2018 BBA in INB, SLO 1, Formative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 80 80 57.89 60 52.94 51.89 43.14 46.23 37.72 60 51.89 40 46.23

40 20 4.39 3.92 Percentage of Percentage Students 1.89 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 1.89 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure INB- 3 Figure INB- 4

Student Learning Measurement Measure Results Status Closing the Loop Outcomes Criteria 2. Demonstrate Summative: - Exit Exit Assessment Test: See Figures Target: 80% of the students should meet and Course components are constantly reviewed to working knowledge Assessment Test, and Meets expectations- INB 5 – 8. exceed the expectations of SLO2. ensure that students can continue to critically in the area of Course-Embedded 60% to 80%, Does identify problems and solve those using their marketing, finance Assessment (INB 480 Not Meet Students met the target. knowledge of business studies. and management group term projects) expectations-< 60/%, from a business Meets expectations-> Trend: Students exhibit satisfactory perspective in an Formative: Course- 80% performance in this area. international Embedded Assessment context. (INB 372 case studies) Course-Embedded Assessment: Rubric # INB.2.R.1

BBA in INB, SLO 2, Summative, Spring 2018 BBA in INB, SLO 2, Summative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 80 63 80 55.64 60 44.37 55.64 37 40 40 60 40 44.37 20 40 20

Percentage of Percentage Students 0 0 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 0 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure INB- 5 Figure INB- 6

BBA in INB, SLO 2, Formative, Spring 2018 BBA in INB, SLO 2, Formative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 80 68.87 80 68.87 60 49.56 47.52 45.13 38.61 60 40 28.3

20 13.86 40 5.31

28.3 of Percentage Students 2.83 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2.83 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure INB- 7 Figure INB- 8

Student Learning Measure Measurement Criteria Results Status Closing the Loop Outcomes 3. Assess factors Summative- Exit Exit Assessment Test: See Figures Target: 80% of the students should A seminar was organized for students where the that determine Assessment Test, and Meets expectations- 60% INB 9 – 12. meet and exceed the expectations of Head of Marketing of HATIL Complex Limited, international trade Course-Embedded to 80%, Does Not Meet SLO3. Mr. Firoz Al Mamun talked about the hurdles and patterns & capital Assessment (INB 480 expectations-< 60%, Meets opportunities of operating in an international flows and the impact group term projects) expectations-> 80%. Students met the target. environment. Mr. Mamun advised the students of international first to know the market they are in along with the institutions on Formative: Course- Course-Embedded Trend: Students performance is competitors, and then come up with a counter global business Embedded Assessment Assessment: Rubric # showing a positive trend, especially in plan. operations. (INB 372 case studies) INB.3.R.1 formative assessment where there is an increase in percentage of students exceeding expectations.

BBA in INB, SLO 3, Summative, Spring 2018 BBA in INB, SLO 3, Summative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 80 66.18 70 80 66.18 60 52.75 37.5 60 40 20.84 16.67 13.34 12.99

40 20 9.75 Percentage of Percentage Students 20.84 0 20 12.99 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure INB- 9 Figure INB- 10

BBA in INB, SLO 3, Formative, Spring 2018 BBA in INB, SLO 3, Formative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 80

80 54.46 60 50.43 49.06 41.88 45.28 37.62 60 49.06 40 45.28 20

40 7.69 7.92 5.66 Percentage of Percentage Students 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 5.66

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure INB- 11 Figure INB- 12

Student Learning Measure Measurement Criteria Results Status Closing the Loop Outcomes 4. Identify the Summative- Exit Exit Assessment Test: See Figures 13 Target: 80% of the students should meet Students were exposed to more interactive international Assessment Test, and Meets expectations- 60% – 16. and exceed the expectations of SLO3. classroom assignments and presentations competitiveness of Course-Embedded to 80%, Does Not Meet along with that introduction of new cases as nations and their Assessment (INB 480 expectations-< 60%, Meets Students met the target. well as conducting seminars on relevant attractiveness for group term projects) expectations-> 80%. topics. international Trend: Students performance has business. Formative: Course- Course-Embedded improved over the period, especially in Embedded Assessment Assessment: Rubric # summative assessment where there is an (INB 372 case studies) INB.4.R.1 increase in percentage of students exceeding expectations.

BBA in INB, SLO 4, Summative, Spring 2018 BBA in INB, SLO 4, Summative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 80 73.34 67.25 80 58.34 60 58.34 41.67 60 40 23.75 41.67 13.34 13.34 40 20 9

Percentage of Percentage Students 0 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 0 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure INB- 13 Figure INB- 14

BBA in INB, SLO 4, Formative, Spring 2018 BBA in INB, SLO 4, Formative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 80 63.21 80 59.41 60 52.63 63.21 39.47 60 40 30.69 27.36

40 20 7.89 9.9 9.43

27.36 of Percentage Students 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 9.43 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure INB- 15 Figure INB- 16

Student Learning Measure Measurement Criteria Results Status Closing the Loop Outcomes 5. Exhibit critical Summative- Exit Exit Assessment Test: See Figures Target: 100% of the students should meet and A seminar titled “International Journey thinking skills to Assessment Test, and Meets expectations- 60% INB 17 – 20. exceed the expectations of SLO5. of HATIL: Hurdles and Opportunities ethically address Course-Embedded to 80%, Does Not Meet of Operating in an International complex real-world Assessment (INB 480 expectations-< 60%, Meets Students failed to meet the target. Environment” was organized and international group term projects) expectations-> 80%. hosted by the Student Engagement business. Trend: Student performance is poor in Committee of the Department of Formative: Course- Course-Embedded summative assessment. However, in formative Marketing & International Business, Embedded Assessment Assessment: Rubric # assessment performance has improved over the NSUSBE with the collaboration of (INB 372 case studies) INB.5.R.1 periods with an increase in percentage of students “The Marketing Club” (TMC) and exceeding expectations. “International Business Club” (IBC).

BBA in INB, SLO 5, Summative, Spring 2018 BBA in INB, SLO 5, Summative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 86.67 80 80 60.3 60 54 60.3 60 40 25 21 18.87 20.84 40 20 10

3.34 Percentage of Percentage Students 18.87 20.84 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure INB- 17 Figure INB- 18

BBA in INB, SLO 5, Formative, Spring 2018 BBA in INB, SLO 5, Formative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 80 80 60 51.75 54 51.89 46.23 44.74 42 60 51.89 40 46.23

40 20 3.51 4 Percentage of Percentage Students 1.89 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 1.89 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure INB- 19 Figure INB- 20

Spring 2018 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in MIS Program Student Learning Measurement Measure Results Observation Closing the Loop Outcome Criteria 1. Apply managerial Summative: Exit Assessment Test: See Figures MIS 1 – Target: 80% students should meet or Up to date business case studies related to concepts and decision Exit Assessment Test, Meets Expectation: 4. exceed expectation. enterprise information systems are included and theories to use and Course 60% to 80% practiced in different MIS courses, so that enterprise information Embedded Does Not Meet Students met the target. students be able to apply these concepts in systems. Assessment (MIS470 Expectation: <60% solving complex decision problems. group term projects) Exceeds Expectation: Trend: We are pleased with the >80% students‟ performance in this area. Formative: Course Embedded Course-Embedded Assessment (MIS205 Assessment: Rubric # group term projects) MIS.1.R.1

BBA in MIS, SLO 1, Summative, Spring 2018 BBA in MIS, SLO 1, Summative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 80 71.43 80 71.43 60 43.75 36.37 37.5 60 40 18.75 14.29 14.29 20 9.09

40 4.55 Percentage of Percentage Students 0 20 14.29 14.29 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure MIS 1 Figure MIS 2

BBA in MIS, SLO 1, Formative, Spring 2018 BBA in MIS, SLO 1, Formative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 80 62.5 80 55.56 60 50 50 44.44 55.56 37.5 60 40 44.44 40 20

Percentage of Percentage Students 0 0 0 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 0 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure MIS 3 Figure MIS 4

Student Learning Measurement Measure Results Observation Closing the Loop Outcome Criteria 2. Demonstrate the Summative: Exit Assessment Test See Figures MIS 5 – Target: 75% students should meet The practice to demonstrate the understanding understanding about Exit Assessment Test, Meets Expectation: 8. or exceed expectation. on different application software and practically systems theory, and Course 60% to 80% use them in solving specific problems continued systems analysis, Embedded Does Not Meet Student met the target. in the semester. systems design and Assessment (MIS470 Expectation: <60% project management. group term projects) Exceeds Expectation: Trend: Students exhibit good >80% performance in this area with Formative: significant percentage of students Course Embedded Course-Embedded exceeding expectations. Assessment (MIS205 Assessment: Rubric # group term projects) MIS.2.R.1

BBA in MIS, SLO 2, Summative, Spring 2018 BBA in MIS, SLO 2, Summative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 80 75 80 57.14 60 57.14 40.91 60 40 28.57 18.75 20 14.29 40 4.55 6.25 4.55

28.57 of Percentage Students 0 20 14.29 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure MIS 5 Figure MIS 6

BBA in MIS, SLO 2, Formative, Spring 2018 BBA in MIS, SLO 2, Formative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 87.5 100 80 66.67 80 60 66.67 60 40 60 40 33.33

12.5 40 33.33 20

Figure MIS 7 Figure MIS 8

Student Learning Measurement Measure Results Observation Closing the Loop Outcome Criteria 3. Exhibit the Summative: Exit Assessment Test See Target: 80% students should meet or exceed Exercises and Cases on web-based information knowledge on web- Exit Assessment Test, Meets Expectation: Figures expectation. systems (e.g., E-business, E-commerce) are based information and Course 60% to 80% MIS 9 – practiced in classes, so that students can gain systems in business Embedded Does Not Meet 12. Students did not meet the target in summative knowledge about different operational context. Assessment (MIS470 Expectation: <60% assessment. components of web-based IS. group term projects) Exceeds Expectation: >80% Trend: There is an increase in percentage of Formative: students not meeting expectations in summative Course Embedded Course-Embedded assessment. This is an area of great concern. Assessment (MIS205 Assessment: Rubric # group term projects) MIS.3.R.1

BBA in MIS, SLO 3, Summative, Spring 2018 BBA in MIS, SLO 3, Summative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 80 80 56.25 60 42.86 60 40 31.82 25 28.57 28.57 42.86 18.75 20 13.64 40 4.55

28.57 28.57 of Percentage Students 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure MIS 9 Figure MIS 10

BBA in MIS, SLO 3, Formative, Spring 2018 BBA in MIS, SLO 3, Formative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 93.75 100 88.89 100 88.89 80 80 60 50 50

60 40

20 11.11 40 6.25 Percentage of Percentage Students 0 0 0 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 11.11 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 0 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure MIS 11 Figure MIS 12

Student Learning Measurement Measure Results Observation Closing the Loop Outcome Criteria 4. Develop and Summative: Exit Assessment Test See Target: 80% students should meet or exceed Pre-selected business application tools and lab implement Exit Assessment Test, Meets Expectation: Figures expectation. exercises are discussed and demonstrated in theory information systems and Course 60% to 80% MIS 13 and lab classes, so that students can design, with the help of latest Embedded Does Not Meet – 16. Students met the target implement, and evaluate different systems as per business tools. Assessment (MIS470 Expectation: <60% instructions provided and with specific features. group term projects) Exceeds Expectation: Trend: Students performance has improved >80% over the period in formative assessment with Formative: an increase in percentage of students Course Embedded Course-Embedded exceeding expectations. Assessment (MIS205 Assessment: Rubric # group term projects) MIS.4.R.1

BBA in MIS, SLO 4, Summative, Spring 2018 BBA in MIS, SLO 4, Summative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 85.71 85.71 80 68.75 80 60

60 40 27.28 25 18.18 20 14.29 40 6.25 4.55 Percentage of Percentage Students 0 0 20 14.29 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 0 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure MIS 13 Figure MIS 14

BBA in MIS, SLO 4, Formative, Spring 2018 BBA in MIS, SLO 4, Formative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 81.25 83.33 83.33 80 80 60 50 40 60 40 18.75 16.67 40 20 10

Percentage of Percentage Students 0 0 16.67 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 0 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure MIS 15 Figure MIS 16

Student Learning Measurement Measure Results Observation Closing the Loop Outcome Criteria 5. Illustrate the Summative: Exit Assessment Test See Target: 80% students should meet or exceed There is sufficient coverage on Information familiarity about Exit Assessment Test, Meets Expectation: Figures expectation. Systems privacy, security, and protective computer networks and Course 60% to 80% MIS 17 measures so that students can identify and solve and security concepts. Embedded Does Not Meet – 20. Students met the target. different security issues and network threats. Assessment (MIS470 Expectation: <60% group term projects) Exceeds Expectation: Trend: Students performance has improved over >80% the period both in summative and formative Formative: assessment with an increase in percentage of Course Embedded Course-Embedded students exceeding expectations. Assessment (MIS205 Assessment: Rubric # group term projects) MIS.5.R.1

BBA in MIS, SLO 5, Summative, Spring 2018 BBA in MIS, SLO 5, Summative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 81.25 80 80 57.14 60 57.14 60 40 28.57 22.73 22.73 20 14.29 12.5 40 4.55 6.25

28.57 of Percentage Students 0 20 14.29 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure MIS 17 Figure MIS 18

BBA in MIS, SLO 5, Formative, Spring 2018 BBA in MIS, SLO 5, Formative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 88.89 100 88.89 81.25 80 70 80 60

60 40 18.75 20 40 20 11.11 10

Percentage of Percentage Students 0 0 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 11.11 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 0 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure MIS 19 Figure MIS 20

Spring 2018 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in Marketing (“MKT”) Student Learning Measure Measurement Criteria Results Observation(s) Closing the Loop Outcomes 1. Demonstrate a thorough Summative- Exit Exit Assessment Test: Meets See Target: 75% of the students should NSU hosted the Grand Finale of Ad Maker understanding of the Assessment Test, and Expectations- 60% to 80%, Figures meet and exceed the expectations Bangladesh organized by NSU YES!. The marketing management Course-Embedded Does Not Meet MKT 1 of SLO1. month-long event gave students a platform process including marketing Assessment (MKT 460 Expectations-< 60%, – 4. to showcase their marketing skills. The Student met the target. strategy formulation and group term projects.) Exceeds Expectations-> 80% event was spread over several rounds of marketing plan Formative- Course- Trend: Students performance has case solving, presenting, ad making, Course-Embedded implementation Embedded Assessment improved over time. activation phases and campaigns, all of Assessment: Rubric # (MKT 337 group term which educated the participants and gave MKT.1.R.1 (formative), and projects) them a platform to learn the core concepts rubric # MKT.1.R.2 of marketing and develop their skills. (summative)

BBA in Marketing, SLO 1, Summative, Spring 2018 BBA in Marketing, SLO 1, Summative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 80 67.34 80 60 53.78 52.71 44 46.37 60 52.71 40 46.37 25.24

40 20 7.43

Percentage of Percentage Students 2.22 0.92 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 0.92 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure MKT- 1 Figure MKT- 2

BBA in Marketing, SLO 1, Formative, Spring 2018 BBA in Marketing, SLO 1, Formative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 80 61.36 80 57.14 60 60 60 36.36 38.1 60 40 34.29

34.29 20 40 4.76 5.71

Percentage of Percentage Students 2.27 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 5.71

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure MKT- 3 Figure MKT- 4

Student Learning Measure Measurement Criteria Results Observation(s) Closing the Loop Outcomes 2. Understand the roles of Summative- Exit Exit Assessment Test: Meets See Figures Target: 80% of the students should A Seminar entitled „The Impact of different areas of Marketing Assessment Test, and Expectations- 60% to 80%, MKT 5 – 8. meet and exceed the expectations of Digital Marketing‟ on March 13 was Communications. Course-Embedded Does Not Meet SLO2 organized by the Department of Assessment (MKT 460 Expectations-< 60%, Marketing & International Business Students met the target. group term projects) Exceeds expectations-> 80% and ADN Digital. The seminar Formative: Course- Course-Embedded Trend: Students exhibit satisfactory intended to bring industry insights Embedded Assessment Assessment: Rubric # performance in this area. into the classroom especially for the (MKT 337 group term MKT.2.R.1 students of marketing with courses projects) like Promotional Management, Digital Marketing, and Brand Management.

BBA in Marketing, SLO 2, Summative, Spring 2018 BBA in Marketing, SLO 2, Summative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 80 69.34 80 58.67 61.32 60 58.67 40.87 34.88 60 40 30 40.87 40 20 3.81 Percentage of Percentage Students 0.67 0.46 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 0.46 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure MKT- 5 Figure MKT- 6

BBA in Marketing, SLO 2, Formative, Spring 2018 BBA in Marketing, SLO 2, Formative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 77.78 80 80 61.43 60 61.43 44.44 60 40 31.43 31.48 22.22 24.07 20 40 31.43 7.14 Percentage of Percentage Students 0 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 7.14 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure MKT- 7 Figure MKT- 8

Student Learning Measure Measurement Criteria Results Observation(s) Closing the Loop Outcomes 3. Apply concepts of Summative: - Exit Exit Assessment Test: Meets See Figures Target- 75% of the students Ms. Narmin Tartila Banu, Senior consumer behavior to Assessment Test, and Expectations- 60% to 80%, 9 – 12. should be able to meet and exceed Lecturer of the Department of Marketing develop marketing strategy. Course-Embedded Does Not Meet the expectation of SLO3. & International Business, invited two Assessment (MKT 460 Expectations-< 60%, industry experts to address the students group term projects) Exceeds Expectations-> Students met the target. taking her Brand management course. Formative: Course- 80%. The first speaker, Chowdhury Embedded Assessment Course-Embedded Trend: Students performance has Asifuzzaman, Senior Manager, (MKT 337 group term Assessment: Rubric # deteriorated over the period in Boomerang Digital, discussed the basics projects) MKT.3.R.1 formative assessment with an of Digital Marketing and how Digital increase in percentage of students Marketing is a major aspect of modern not meeting expectations. day marketing. The second speaker,Manas Paul, Associate Director, Asiatic EXP, discussed how BTL activations are designed to build brand equity.

BBA in Marketing, SLO 3, Summative, Spring 2018 BBA in Marketing, SLO 3, Summative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 80 69.04 80 69.04 60 55.28 44.49 48.45 37.11 60 40 22.21 14.45 40 20 8.76

Percentage of Percentage Students 0.24 22.21 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 8.76 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure MKT- 9 Figure MKT- 10

BBA in Marketing, SLO 3, Formative, Spring 2018 BBA in Marketing, SLO 3, Formative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 80 80 55.56 60 47.37 42.86 45.61 40 37.14 60 40 42.86 20 37.14 20

40 7.02 4.44 Percentage of Percentage Students 20 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure MKT- 11 Figure MKT- 12

Student Learning Measure Measurement Criteria Results Observation(s) Closing the Loop Outcomes 4. Demonstrate skills to Summative: - Exit Exit Assessment Test: Meets See Target- 80% of the The Marketing Club of North South University critically analyze a problem, Assessment Test, and Expectations- 60% to 80%, Figures 13 students should be launched their first inter-university digital marketing design and implement Course-Embedded Does Not Meet – 16. able to meet and competition of Bangladesh „#Marketing V.3‟ with the appropriate solutions. Assessment (MKT 460 Expectations-< 60%, exceed the tagline “Join the Webolution”, sponsored by Linkus group term projects) Exceeds Expectations-> 80% expectation of and powered by Index Group. This competition gave Formative:- Course- Course-Embedded SLO4. students the opportunity to evaluate real life scenarios Embedded Assessment Assessment: Rubric # and use different marketing tools to develop a (MKT 337 group term MKT.4.R.1 (formative), and Students met the marketing strategy. projects) rubric # MKT.4.R.2 target. (summative) Trend: Student performance is improving over time.

BBA in Marketing, SLO 4, Summative, Spring 2018 BBA in Marketing, SLO 4, Summative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 76.12 79.41 80 79.41 66 80 60

60 40 26.67 20.4 18.98 40 20 3.5 7.34 Percentage of Percentage Students 1.62 18.98 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 1.62 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure MKT- 13 Figure MKT- 14

BBA in Marketing, SLO 4, Formative, Spring 2018 BBA in Marketing, SLO 4, Formative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 80 65.71 80 57.14 55.56 65.71 60 35.56 60 40 32.14 34.29

40 34.29 20 10.71 8.89

Figure MKT- 15 Figure MKT- 16

Student Learning Measure Measurement Criteria Results Observation(s) Closing the Loop Outcomes 5. Practice and set examples Summative: Exit Assessment Exit Assessment Test: Meets See Figure 17 Target- 100% of the students The Self Assessment Committee (SAC) on responsible and ethical Test, and Course-Embedded Expectations- 60% to 80%, – 20. should be able to meet and of the Marketing & International Business marketing. Assessment (MKT 460 Does Not Meet expectations- exceed the expectation of (MIB) hosted a session titled "Session on group term projects) < 60%, Exceeds SLO5. Innovation and marketing at the Bottom Formative: Course- Expectations-> 80% of the Pyramid" for students. Embedded Assessment Course-Embedded Students failed to meet the (MKT 337 group term Assessment: Rubric # target. projects) MKT.5.R.1 Trend: Students performance is improving over time with an increase in percentage of students exceeding expectations.

BBA in Marketing, SLO 5, Summative, Spring 2018 BBA in Marketing, SLO 5, Summative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 74.2 80 68.67 80 74.2 59.54 60 39.29 60 40 25.56 20 11.06 14.75 40 5.78

Percentage of Percentage Students 1.18 0 20 14.75 Percentage of Percentage Students 11.06 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure MKT- 17 Figure MKT- 18

BBA in Marketing, SLO 5, Formative, Spring 2018 BBA in Marketing, SLO 5, Formative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100 100 80 62.86 80 60.71 60 51.11 62.86 44.44 35.71 60 40 33.93

35.71 20 40 5.36 4.44 Percentage of Percentage Students 1.43 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 1.43 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure MKT- 19 Figure MKT- 20

Spring 2018 Student Learning Assessment Report: BS in Economics Program Learning Goal Measure Measurement Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 1. Knowledge of General Summative: Exit Exit Assessment Test: Please see Target: 65% students should Course components are Economic Theories and Assessment Test, and Meets Expectation 60% to figures BSE meet or exceed expectations. constantly reviewed to ensure Policies Course-Embedded 80%, Does Not Meet – 1 through that students can continue to Assessment ECO 495 Expectation < 60%, BSE – 4. Students met target. critically identify problems and (Supervised Research Exceeds Expectation > solve those using their Paper) or ECO 499 80%. Trend: Although students met knowledge of business studies. (Thesis) the target the percentage of Course-Embedded students‟ not meeting Formative: ECO 303 and Assessment: Rubric # expectations has increased over ECO 304 selected BS.1.1.1.1 the year. questions from final exam.

BS in Economics, PLG 1, Summative, Spring 2018 BS in Economics, PLG 1, Summative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E= Exceeds Expectation 100 100 80 70.24 69.17 80 62.32 60 62.32 60 40 27.39 22.62 25.84 40 20 10.3

Percentage of Percentage Students 7.15 27.39 5 0

Percentage of Percentage Students 20 10.3 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure BSE - 1 Figure BSE - 2

BS in Economics, PLG 1, Formative, Spring 2018 BS in Economics, PLG 1, Formative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E= Exceeds Expectation 100.00 100 75.56 80.00 65.00 80 60.00 50.00

60 50 40.00 30.00 24.44 25.00 25.00 20.00 40 5.00 25 25 of Percentage Students 0.00 0.00 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure BSE - 3 Figure BSE - 4

Program Learning Goal Measure Measurement Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 2. Relevant Quantitative Summative: Exit Exit Assessment Test: Please see Target: 60%students should Courses have been standardized in Skill Development for Assessment Test, and Meets Expectation 60% to figures BSE meet or exceed expectations. terms of content, sequence of theoretical and empirical Course-Embedded 80%, Does Not Meet – 5 through coverage, grading, use of text book analyses. Assessment ECO 495 Expectation < 60%, BSE – 8. Students met the target. and other learning resources. (Supervised Research Exceeds Expectation > Paper) or ECO 499 (Thesis) 80%. Trend: There is a significant increase in percentage of Formative: ECO 303 Course-Embedded students not meeting selected question from final Assessment: Rubric # expectations. This is an area exam, ECO 372 term BS.2.1.1.1 of concern. projects

BS in Economics, PLG 2, Summative, Spring 2018 BS in Economics, PLG 2, Summative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E= Exceeds Expectation 100 100 76.19 80 80 57.92 59.01 60 59.01 60 40 35.11 34.59 19.05 40 35.11 20

7.5 4.76 5.88 Percentage of Percentage Students 0

20 Percentage of Percentage Students 5.88 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure BSE - 5 Figure BSE - 6

BS in Economics, PLG 2, Formative, Spring 2018 BS in Economics, PLG 2, Formative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E= Exceeds Expectation 100.00 90.00 100.00 85.42 80.00 66.67 80.00 66.67 60.00

60.00 40.00 33.33

14.58 40.00 33.33 20.00 10.00

Percentage of Percentage Students 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 Percentage of Percentage Students 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP 0.00 0.00 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure BSE - 7 Figure BSE - 8

Program Learning Goal Measure Measurement Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 3. Research Skill Summative: Exit Exit Assessment Test: Please see Target: 60% students should This semester NSU Young Economists‟ Development Assessment Test, and Meets Expectation 60% to figures BSE meet or exceed expectations. Forum (YEF) organized the event Course-Embedded 80%, Does Not Meet – 9 through EconFest 4.0 for the students. It was a Assessment ECO 495 Expectation < 60%, BSE – 12. Students met the target in two-day event aimed to provide a (Supervised Research Exceeds Expectation > formative assessment but not in platform for economic discussion on all levels, to enrich the knowledge of Paper) or ECO 499 80%. summative assessment. people from varied age groups and (Thesis) encourage growth in awareness of Course-Embedded Trend: Students performance is current economic concerns for the Formative: ECO 372 term Assessment: Rubric # very poor in summative youth of the nation. project. BS.3.1.1.1 assessment. This is a major area of concern.

BS in Economics, PLG 3, Summative, Spring 2018 BS in Economics, PLG 3, Summative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E= Exceeds Expectation 100 100 80 80 60 49.63 47.62 50.37 42.5 60 34.17 33.34 49.63 50.37 40 23.34 19.05 40 20

Percentage of Percentage Students 0 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP 0 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure BSE - 9 Figure BSE - 10

BS in Economics, PLG 3, Formative, Spring 2018 BS in Economics, PLG 3, Formative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E= Exceeds Expectation 100.00 100 100.00 87.50 100 80.00 80 60.00 50.00 40.00 60 40.00

12.50 40 20.00 10.00

Percentage of Percentage Students 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP 0 0 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure BSE - 11 Figure BSE - 12

Program Learning Goal Measure Measurement Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 4. Communication Skill Summative: Exit Exit Assessment Test: Please see Target: 70% students should This semester in EconFest 4.0 there Development Assessment Test, and Meets Expectation 60% to figures BSE meet or exceed target. was an inter-university paper Course-Embedded 80%, Does Not Meet – 13 presentation competition titled Assessment ECO 495 Expectation < 60%, through Students failed to meet the Speakonomics Senior where (Supervised Research Exceeds Expectation > BSE – 16. target. undergraduate students presented their Research paper‟s abstracts on “Is Paper) or ECO 499 80%. Higher Education an Effective way to (Thesis) Trend: The percentages of close the 21st Century Skills Gap in Course-Embedded students‟ not meeting Bangladesh”. The topic challenged Formative: ECO 304 Assessment: Rubric # expectation in both summative writers and aspiring Economists to selected question from BS.4.1.1.1 and formative assessment have delve into the analysis of higher final exam. increased over the years. This education and its potential in bridging is also an area of major market gaps. concern.

BS in Economics, PLG 4, Summative, Spring 2018 BS in Economics, PLG 4, Summative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E= Exceeds Expectation 100 100 80 80 56.99 60 47.5 43.02 42.86 56.99 39.17 35.72 60 40 43.02 21.43 13.34 40 20

Figure BSE - 13 Figure BSE - 14

BS in Economics, PLG 4, Formative, Spring 2018 BS in Economics, PLG 4, Formative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E= Exceeds Expectation 100.00 88.89 100 80.00 80 60.00 60.00 50.00 40.00 60 50 40.00 30.00 40 40 20.00 11.11 10.00 10.00

Percentage of Percentage Students 0.00 0.00 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 10 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure BSE - 15 Figure BSE - 16

Program Learning Goal Measure Measurement Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 5. Critical Thinking and Summative: Exit Exit Assessment Test: Please see Target: 60% students should EconFest 4.0, organized by YEF, Analysis Assessment Test, and Meets Expectation 60% figures meet or exceed expectations. consisted of a session titled Expert's Course-Embedded to 80%, Does Not Meet BSE – 17 Dialogue where eminent economists Assessment ECO 495 Expectation < 60%, through Students met the target. conducted a panel discussion relevant to (Supervised Research Paper) Exceeds Expectation > BSE – 20. the theme of the event, “Education in Bangladesh”. The session followed up or ECO 499 (Thesis) 80%. Trend: The percentage of with a Q&A session where esteemed students meeting expectation guests interacted with students and Formative: ECO 303 Course-Embedded has increased over the years. answered their questions. selected question from final Assessment: Rubric # exam. BS.5.1.1.1

BS in Economics, PLG 5, Summative, Spring 2018 BS in Economics, PLG 5, Summative, Trend M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E= Exceeds Expectation 100 100 84.56 84.56 80 66.67 80 57.14 60 38.1 60 40 23.34 20 10 12.5 40 4.76

Percentage of Percentage Students 2.94 0 20 12.5 Percentage of Percentage Students 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP 2.94 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure BSE - 17 Figure BSE - 18

Spring 2018 Student Learning Assessment Report: MS in Economics Student Program Learning Measurement Learning Goal Outcome Measure Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 1. Critical 1.1 Interpret and Summative: Rubric # MS.1.1.1.1 Please Target: 60% students The Office of External Affairs of NSU thinking skills in critically review Course-Embedded see should meet or exceed organized an event for the students relation to articles in the Assessment: ECO figures expectations. where Daniel M. Kammen, Professor microeconomics, economics 695 or ECO 699 MSE – 1 of Energy at the University of macroeconomics research Literature Review through Students met the target. California, Berkeley, talked about the and econometrics literature. Section of Thesis or MSE – “Profitably Powering the Clean Energy Research Papers 4. Trend: We are pleased Economy”. with students‟ performance Formative: ECO 502 in this area. Formative final term paper. assessment could not be measured for this period as Eco 502 was not offered in this semester.

M.S. in Economics, PLG 1, SLO 1.1, Summative, Spring 2018 MS in Economics, PLG 1, SLO 1.1, Summative M=Meets Expectation, D= Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expectations 100 100 100 100 100 80 66.67 80 60

60 40 33.33

40 20

Percentage of Percentage Students 0 0 0 0 0 0

Percentage of Percentage Students 20 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP 0 0 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure MSE - 1 Figure MSE - 2

Student Program Learning Measurement Learning Goal Outcome Measure Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 2. Quantitative 2.1 Take a Summative: MS2.1.1.1 Please Target: 60% students should Young Economists‟ Forum of analytical skills rigorous, Course-Embedded see meet or exceed expectations. Economics Department arranged in application of quantitative Assessment: ECO figures EconFest 4.0 for the economics students. economics approach to 695 or ECO 699 MSE – 5 Students met the target. This event provided a platform for economic Literature Review through aspiring economists to share their problems. Section of Thesis or MSE – 8. Trend: Students performance is thoughts and interact with some of Research Papers alarming in this area. Significant country‟s finest economists proportion of students failed to Formative: ECO 502 meet the expectations. Formative final examination. assessment could not be measured for this period as Eco 502 was not offered in this semester

M.S. in Economics, PLG 1, SLO 2.1, Summative, Spring 2018 MS in Economics, PLG 1, SLO 2.1, Summative M=Meets Expectation, D= Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expectations

100 100 75 80 80 75 66.67 60 50 60 40 33.33 33.33 25 16.67 40 20 25 0 0 Percentage of Percentage Students 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP 0 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure MSE - 3 Figure MSE - 4

Student Program Learning Measurement Learning Goal Outcome Measure Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 2. Quantitative 2.2 Develop basic Summative: ECO MS.2.2.1.1 Please Target: 60% students Young Economists‟ Forum of Economics analytical skills research skills in 695 or ECO 699: see should meet or exceed Department arranged EconFest 4.0 for the in application of order to conduct Economic modeling figures expectations. economics students. This event provided a economics research with section of research MSE – 9 platform for aspiring economists to share minimal papers or thesis. and Students met the their thoughts and interact with some of supervision MSE - target. country‟s finest economists 10 Trend: Although students exhibited a good performance there is a decrease in percentage of students exceeding expectation.

M.S. in Economics, PLG 2, SLO 2.2, Summative, Spring MS in Economics, PLG 2, SLO 2.2, Summative 100 2018 M=Meets Expectation, D= Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds 100 Expectations 100 80 100 66.67

60 50 50 80 40 33.33 60 20

40 of Percentage Students 0 0 0 0 0 20 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP Percentage of Percentage Students 0 0 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure MSE - 5 Figure MSE - 6

Student Program Learning Measurement Learning Goal Outcome Measure Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 3. Problem 3.1 Use economic Summative: ECO MS.3.1.1.1 Please Target: 60% students should meet or Course components are constantly solving skills for principles, 695 or ECO 699: see exceed expectations. reviewed to ensure that students can economic and theories and Economic modeling figures continue to critically identify problems business decision models to section of research MSE – Students met the target in summative and solve those using their knowledge of business studies. making in public analyze and papers or thesis 11 assessment but not in formative and private explain how through assessment. sectors decisions are Formative: ECO 503 MSE - made by final Exam or ECO 14 Trend: In formative assessment there individuals, 504 final exam. is a significant increase in the organizations and percentage of students not meeting societies. expectations. This is an area of concern.

M.S. in Economics, PLG 3, SLO 3.1, Summative, Spring MS in Economics, PLG 3, SLO 3.1, Summative 100 2018 100 M=Meets Expectation, D= Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expectations 100 100 80 66.67 60 50 50 80 40 33.33 60 20 40 0 0 0 0 Percentage of Percentage Students 0 20 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP

Percentage of Percentage Students 0 0 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure MSE - 7 Figure MSE - 8

M.S. in Economics, PLG 3, SLO 3.1, Formative, Spring 2018 MS in Economics, PLG 3, SLO 3.1, Formative M=Meets Expectation, D= Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expectations 100 100 87.5 80 70 80 60 50 50 60 50 50 40 20 40 20 10 12.5

Percentage of Percentage Students 0 0 0 20 Percentage of Percentage Students 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP 2016 FA 2017 SP 2018 SP 0 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEEDS EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure MSE - 9 Figure MSE - 10

Spring 2018 Student Learning Assessment Report: Master of Business Administration Student Program Learning Learning Goal Outcome Measure Measurement Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 1. Managerial 1.1 Communicate Summative: Exit Assessment Tests: Meets See Target: 80% students should meet or, exceed Dr. Farzana, Assistant Communications effectively Assessment Test, Expectation: 60% -80%; Does Figures expectation. Professor of MIB toward and Course- Not Meet Expectation < 60%; MBA- 1 Department) invited Mr. A S Students failed to meet the target in the achieving Embedded Exceeds Expectation> 80% through M Faisal, General Manager, summative assessment. Students met the managerial Assessment (BUS MBA-4 Enterprise PMO, Robi objectives. 690 final term target in formative assessment. Axiata Ltd. to lead a session projects) Course-Embedded of Promotional Management Assessment: Rubric # Trend: Students performance in summative course at MBA level. This Formative: Course- MB.1.1.1.1 assessment is still a major area of concern. practical session was highly Embedded However percentage of students meeting and influential for students to Assessment (BUS exceeding expectation has increase showing realize the different pattern 650 final term an improvement in the area over the periods. of integrated marketing projects) communication competencies within high- tech industry.

MBA PLG 1; SLO 1.1; Spring 2018; Summative MBA PLG 1; SLO 1.1; Summative; Trend M=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expectation 80 100 61.91 63.59 60 52.56 80 41.19 40 34.09 63.59 25.22 60 20 11.19 4 6.25 40 0 25.22

Percentages Percentages Students of 2017 2017 2018 SP 2017 2017 2018 SP 2017 2017 2018 SP 20 11.19 SU FA SU FA SU FA

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEED EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure MBA - 1 Figure MBA - 2

MBA PLG 1; SLO 1.1; Spring 2018; Formative MBA PLG 1; SLO 1.1; Formative; Trend M=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expecations 120 100 91.67 100 100 91.67

80 80 66.67 60 60 40 33.33

40 20 8.33

Percentages Percentages Students of 0 0 0 0 0 20 Percentages Percentages Students of 8.33 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 0 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEED EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure MBA - 3 Figure MBA - 4

Student Program Learning Measurement Learning Goal Outcome Measure Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 2. Critical 2.1 Apply Summative: Exit Assessment Tests: Meets See Target: 80% students should meet The Office of External Affairs Thinking and appropriate Assessment Test, and Expectation: 60% -80%; Figures or, exceed expectation. organized the program called “Next Decision analytic Course-Embedded Does Not Meet Generation Leadership" where NSU MBA-5 Students failed to meet the target in Making framework to Assessment (BUS 690 Expectation < 60%; alumni from different fields shared through the summative assessment. solving final term projects) Exceeds Expectation> their personal/professional stories MBA-8 Students met the target in management 80% about leadership. It helped the Formative: Course- formative assessment. problems, and students to acquire an understanding Embedded Assessment Course-Embedded developing of Trend: Student performance in about the current and future trends in (BUS 650 final term Assessment: Rubric # integrative summative assessment is very leadership and learn about different projects) MB.2.1.1.1 managerial poor. This is a major area of leadership styles and values solutions. concern as the students are consistently failing to meet the target. However a slight improvement in performance is seen compared to the previous periods

MBA PLG 2; SLO 2.1; Spring 2018; Summative MBA PLG 2; SLO 2.1; Summative; Trend M=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expectation 80 100 60.81 60 51.53 46.43 47.94 80 39.57 60.81 40 25.1 60 20 14 14.1 40 0.53 0 25.1 Percentages Students of 2017 2017 FA2018 SP 2017 2017 FA2018 SP 2017 2017 FA2018 SP 20 14.1 SU SU SU

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEED EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure MBA - 5 Figure MBA - 6 78

MBA PLG 2; SLO 2.1; Spring 2018; Formative MBA PLG 2; SLO 2.1; Formative; Trend M=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expecations 100 120 100 100 100 93.75

80 80 66.67 60 60 40 33.33

40 20 6.25 Percentages Percentages Students of 0 0 0 0 0 20 Percentages Percentages Students of 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 0 0 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEED EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure MBA - 7 Figure MBA - 8

Student Program Learning Measurement Learning Goal Outcome Measure Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 2. Critical 2.2 Determine Summative: Exit Assessment Tests: Meets See Target: 80% students should meet NSU has taken significant steps Thinking and relevant Assessment Test, and Expectation: 60% -80%; Figures or, exceed expectation. towards improving students learning Decision decision Course-Embedded Does Not Meet experience. This include establishing a MBA-9 Students failed to meet the target Making criteria and Assessment (BUS 690 Expectation < 60%; Business Advisory Board, arranging through in the summative assessment. alternatives, final term projects) Exceeds Expectation> MoU with the Foreign Ministry, MBA-12 Students met the target in and identify 80% updating its curriculum to an formative assessment. the optimal international standard, equipping the Course-Embedded solution Formative: Course- Trend: Students failed to meet CPC office, engaging with the EHS+ Assessment: Rubric # Embedded Assessment the target in summative Center, and creating other offices of MB.2.1.1.1 (BUS 650 final term assessment. The percentage of excellence for closer engagement with projects) students not meeting target is still different industries. high. However a slight improvement in performance is seen compared to the previous periods.

MBA PLG 2; SLO 2.2; Spring 2018; Summative MBA PLG 2; SLO 2.2; Summative; Trend M=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expectation 80 100 65.38 60 54.48 54.78 80 65.38 39.27 40 31.22 60 24.39 14 20 10.22 40 6.25

24.39 Percentages Students of 0 20 10.22 2017 SP 2017 SU 2018 SP 2017 SP 2017 SU 2018 SP 2017 SP 2017 SU 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEED EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure MBA - 9 Figure MBA - 10

MBA PLG 2; SLO 2.2; Spring 2018; Formative MBA PLG 2; SLO 2.2; Formative; Trend M=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expecations 120 100 91.67 100 100 91.67

80 80 66.67 60 60 40 33.33

40 20 8.33

Figure MBA - 11 Figure MBA - 12

Program Measurement Learning Goal Student Learning Outcome Measure Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 3. Integration of 3.1 Integrate and apply the tools Summative: Exit Assessment Tests: See Target: 80% students should This semester MBA Club hosted a management and techniques of Assessment Test, and Meets Figures meet or, exceed expectation. seminar on “Follow Your Passion” tools and management, drawing on a Course-Embedded Expectation: 60% where influent speakers like Mr. MBA-13 Students failed to meet the target techniques broad-based knowledge of Assessment (BUS -80%; Does Not Qazi M Ahmed, President, through in the summative assessment. the major functions 690 final term Meet Expectation Bangladesh Organization for MBA-16 Target is met in formative (accounting, economics, projects) < 60%; Exceeds Learning and Development; Mr. Expectation> 80% assessment. Sunny Sanwar, Additional SP finance, information Chief Bomb Disposal Unit, systems, marketing, Trend: Student performance in Course-Embedded Bangladesh Police; and Mr. operations management, and Formative: Course- summative assessment is very Assessment: Sadman Sadik, Chief Content strategy) to solve complex Embedded poor. This is a major area of Rubric # Creator, Ten Minutes School; were management problems and Assessment (BUS concern as the students are MB.3.1.1.1 presented as keynote speakers. render sound business 650 final term consistently failing to meet the decisions. projects) target.

MBA PLG 3; SLO 3.1; Spring 2018; Summative MBA PLG 3; SLO 3.1; Summative; Trend M=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expectation 80 100 60.77 60 50.78 53.61 80 41.73 40 35.22 36.1 60 53.61

41.73 20 14 40

3.13 4.66 Percentages Percentages Students of 0 20 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 4.66

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEED EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure MBA - 13 Figure MBA - 14

MBA PLG 3; SLO 3.1; Spring 2018; Formative MBA PLG 3; SLO 3.1; Formative; Trend M=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expecations 100 120 100 100 100 87.5

80 80 66.67 60 60 40 33.33

40 20 12.5

Percentages Percentages Students of 0 0 0 0 0 20 Percentages Percentages Students of 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 0 0 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEED EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure MBA - 15 Figure MBA - 16

Program Student Learning Measurement Learning Goal Outcome Measure Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 4. Global 4.1 Augment Summative: Exit Assessment Tests: Meets See Target: 80% students should meet or, Realistic illustrations from the Perspectives business Assessment Test, and Expectation: 60% -80%; Figures exceed expectation. business world, case studies and decisions with Course-Embedded Does Not Meet research articles are used in MBA-17 Students failed to meet the target in global Assessment (BUS 690 Expectation < 60%; classroom teaching to provide through the summative assessment. Target is considerations. final term projects) Exceeds Expectation> students better understanding of 80% MBA-20 met in formative assessment. the subject matter. Formative: Course- Trend: Performance in summative Embedded Assessment Course-Embedded assessment is very poor. Although (BUS 685 final term Assessment: Rubric # target has been met in formative projects) MB.4.1.1.1 assessment focus should also be given in that area as the percentage of student‟s not meeting expectation has drastically increased over the periods.

MBA PLG 4; SLO 4.1; Spring 2018; Summative MBA PLG 4; SLO 4.1; Summative; Trend M=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expectation 80 100 68.75 57.44 60 50.26 80 35.82 57.44 40 60 29.57 27.53 20.17 20 35.82

40 3.72 6.74 Percentages Percentages Students of 0 20 6.74 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEED EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure MBA - 17 Figure MBA - 18

MBA PLG 4; SLO 4.1; Spring 2018; Formative MBA PLG 4; SLO 4.1; Formative; Trend M=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expecations 80 71.43 100 62.5 60.87 60 80 37.5 60.87 40 60 28.57 21.74 17.39 20 40

Percentages Percentages Students of 0 0 21.74 17.39 0 20 Percentages Percentages Students of 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEED EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure MBA - 19 Figure MBA - 20

Student Program Learning Measurement Learning Goal Outcome Measure Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 5. Ethical 5.1 Evaluate and Summative: Exit Assessment Tests: Meets See Target: 80% students NSU Ethics club organizes different seminars Considerations articulate Assessment Test, and Expectation: 60% -80%; Figures should meet or, exceed to make students aware about ethical ethical Course-Embedded Does Not Meet MBA-21 expectation. standards. considerations Assessment (BUS 690 Expectation < 60%; and Students met the target. in managerial final term projects) Exceeds Expectation> MBA-22 decision 80% Trend: Performance has

making and in drastically improved over Course-Embedded enterprise the period with a huge Assessment: Rubric # management. increase in percentage of MB.5.1.1.1 students exceeding expectation.

MBA PLG 5; SLO 5.1; Fall 2017; Summative MBA PLG 5; SLO 5.1; Summative; Trend M=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expectation 60 53.57 100 50 50 47.04 38.96 80 40 31.03

60 53.57 20 15.4 14 40 31.03

Percentages Percentages Students of 0 0 20 15.4 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEED EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure MBA - 21 Figure MBA - 22

Spring 2018 Student Learning Assessment Report: Executive Master of Business Administration Student Program Learning Measurement Learning Goal Outcome Measure Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 1. Managerial 1.1 Communicate Summative: Exit Assessment Tests See Target: 80% students should meet or, Interactive assignments are used in Communications effectively Assessment Test and Meets Expectation: Figures exceed expectation. the courses. Students are required toward Course-Embedded 60% -80%; Does EMBA – to present on relevant topics which achieving Assessment (EMB Not Meet 1 through Students met the target in formative help them develop better managerial 690 final term project) Expectation < 60%; EMBA - assessment but failed to meet it in communication skills. objectives. Exceeds 4 summative assessment. Formative: Course- Expectation> 80% Embedded Trend: Student performance in summative Assessment (EMB Course-Embedded assessment is very poor. This is an area of 650 final term project) Assessment: concern. Although target has been met in Rubric # formative assessment there is an increase EM.1.1.1.1 in percentage of students not meeting expectation over the periods.

EMBA PLG 1; SLO 1.1; Spring 2018; EMBA PLG 1; SLO 1.1; Summative; Trend Summative 100 M=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expectation 81.48 80 68.59 68.95 100 60 80 68.95 40 27.56 21.46 60 20 11.11 9.59 7.41 3.85 40 0

21.46 Percentages Percentages Students of 20 9.59 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEED EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure EMBA - 1 Figure EMBA - 2

EMBA PLG 1; SLO 1.1; Spring 2018; Formative EMBA PLG 1; SLO 1.1; Formative; Trend M=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expecations 100 88.89 87.5 87.5 100 87.5 80 80 60

60 40

40 20 12.5 11.11 12.5

Percentages Percentages Students of 0 0 0 0 20 12.5 Percentages Percentages Students of 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 0 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEED EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure EMBA - 3 Figure EMBA - 4

Student Program Learning Measurement Learning Goal Outcome Measure Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 2. Critical 2.1 Apply Summative: Exit Assessment Tests Meets See Target: 80% students should The Office of External Affairs organized the Thinking and appropriate Assessment Test and Expectation: 60% -80%; Figures meet or, exceed expectation. program called “Next Generation Decision analytic Course-Embedded Does Not Meet EMBA – Leadership" where NSU alumni from Making framework to Assessment (EMB 690 Expectation < 60%; 5 through Students met the target. different fields shared their solving final term project) Exceeds Expectation> EMBA - personal/professional stories about management 80% 8 Trend: Students‟ leadership. It helped the students to acquire problems, and Formative: Course- performance has improved an understanding about the current and developing of Embedded Assessment Course-Embedded over the periods with a future trends in leadership and learn about integrative (EMB 650 final term Assessment: Rubric # significant drop in the different leadership styles and values. managerial project) EM.2.1.1.1 percentage of students not solutions. meeting expectations.

EMBA PLG 2; SLO 2.1; Spring 2018; Summative EMBA PLG 2; SLO 2.1; Summative; Trend M=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expectation 100 100 77.01 80 61.67 80 56.48 60 41.67 38.33 60 40

13.16 40 20 9.83

Percentages Percentages Students of 1.85 0 0 20 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEED EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure EMBA - 5 Figure EMBA - 6

EMBA PLG 2; SLO 2.1; Spring 2018; Formative EMBA PLG 2; SLO 2.1; Formative; Trend M=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expecations 100 120 100 100 100 100 88.89 80 80

60 60 40

40 20 11.11

Percentages Percentages Students of 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 Percentages Percentages Students of 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 0 0 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEED EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure EMBA - 7 Figure EMBA - 8

Student Program Learning Measurement Learning Goal Outcome Measure Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 2. Critical 2.2 Determine Summative: Exit Assessment Tests Meets See Target: 80% students should Realistic illustrations from the business Thinking and relevant Assessment Test and Expectation: 60% -80%; Figures meet or, exceed expectation. world, case studies and research articles are Decision decision Course-Embedded Does Not Meet EMBA – used in classroom teaching to provide Making criteria and Assessment (EMB 690 Expectation < 60%; 9 through Students failed to meet the students better understanding of the subject alternatives, final term project) Exceeds Expectation> EMBA - target in the summative matter. and identify 80% 12 assessment. Students met the the optimal Formative: Course- target in formative solution. Embedded Assessment Course-Embedded assessment. (EMB 650 final term Assessment: Rubric # project) EM.2.1.1.1 Trend: Performance in summative assessment is very poor. However, there is an increase in percentage of students meeting and exceeding expectations. This shows a sign of improvement in this area.

EMBA PLG 2; SLO 2.2; Spring 2018; Summative EMBA PLG 2; SLO 2.2; Summative; Trend M=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expectation 80 100 65.74 67.8 56.67 60 80 67.8 43.33 40 30.56 60 26.32 20 40 3.7 5.88 26.32 0

0 Percentages Percentages Students of 20 5.88 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEED EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure EMBA - 9 Figure EMBA - 10 91

EMBA PLG 2; SLO 2.2; Spring 2018; Formative EMBA PLG 2; SLO 2.2; Formative; Trend M=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expecations 100 120 100 100 100 100 88.89 80 80

60 60 40

40 20 11.11

Figure EMBA - 11 Figure EMBA - 12

Program Student Learning Measurement Learning Goal Outcome Measure Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 3. Integration of 3.1 Integrate and apply the Summative: Exit Assessment Tests See Figures Target: 80% students should Faculties with Ph.D. from North management tools and techniques of Assessment Test Meets EMBA – 13 meet or, exceed expectation. America or equivalent universities and tools and management, drawing and Course- Expectation: 60% through long industry experience at top-level Students failed to meet the techniques on a broad-based Embedded -80%; Does Not EMBA - 16 corporations, teach in the EMBA knowledge of the major Assessment Meet Expectation target in the summative program. functions (accounting, (EMB 690 final < 60%; Exceeds assessment but met the target in

economics, finance, term project) Expectation> 80% formative assessment. information systems, Trend: Performance in marketing, operations Formative: Course-Embedded summative assessment is very management, and Course- Assessment: poor with high percentage of strategy) to solve Embedded Rubric # complex management Assessment EM.3.1.1.1 students not meeting problems and render (EMB 650 final expectation. However, sound business term project) performance has improved over decisions. the period with a decrease in percentage of students not meeting expectations.

EMBA PLG 3; SLO 3.1; Spring 2018; Summative EMBA PLG 3; SLO 3.1; Summative; Trend M=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expectation 100 100 83.33 80 80 60 59.67 60 40 60 40 28.56 16.67 40 20 11.76

Percentages Percentages Students of 0 0 0 20 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEED EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure EMBA - 13 Figure EMBA - 14

EMBA PLG 3; SLO 3.1; Spring 2018; Formative EMBA PLG 3; SLO 3.1; Formative; Trend M=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expecations 100 120 100 100 100 88.89 87.5 80 80

60 60 40

40 20 11.11 12.5

Figure EMBA - 15 Figure EMBA - 16

Student Program Learning Measurement Learning Goal Outcome Measure Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 4. Global 4.1 Augment Summative: Exit Assessment Tests Meets See Target: 80% students The EMBA curriculum recognizes and Perspective business Assessment Test and Expectation: 60% -80%; Figures should meet or, exceed incorporates emerging trends, concepts, and decisions with Course-Embedded Does Not Meet EMBA – expectation. issues of globalization. This is reflected in global Assessment (EMB 690 Expectation < 60%; 17 course design and pedagogy. Students failed to meet the considerations. final term project) Exceeds Expectation> through Interdisciplinary integration with target in both summative 80% EMBA - globalization is attained through a global and formative assessment. Formative: Course- 20 capstone course.

Embedded Assessment Course-Embedded Trend: Student (EMB 670 final term Assessment: Rubric # performance in summative project) EM.4.1.1.1 assessment is very poor and is an area of high concern. Performance in formative assessment has drastically fall in this period making it an area of major concern

EMBA PLG 4; SLO 4.1; Spring 2018; Summative EMBA PLG 4; SLO 4.1; Summative; Trend M=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expectation 80 100 65 60 55.03 80 46.3

40 28.7 28.25 60 25 25 16.72 20

40 10 Percentages Percentages Students of 0 20 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEED EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure EMBA - 17 Figure EMBA - 18

EMBA PLG 4; SLO 4.1; Spring 2018; Formative EMBA PLG 4; SLO 4.1; Formative; Trend M=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expecations 80 100 60 60 50 50 80 40 60 40 33.33 33.33 60 16.67 16.67 40 20 40

Percentages Percentages Students of 0 0 20 Percentages Percentages Students of 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 0 0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEED EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure EMBA - 19 Figure EMBA - 20

Student Program Learning Measurement Learning Goal Outcome Measure Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 5. Ethical 5.1 Evaluate and Summative: Exit Assessment Tests Meets See Target: 80% students should NSU Ethics club organizes different considerations articulate ethical Assessment Test and Expectation: 60% -80%; Figures meet or, exceed expectation seminars to make students aware about considerations in Course-Embedded Does Not Meet EMBA - ethical standards. Students met the target. managerial Assessment (EMB 690 Expectation < 60%; 21 and decision making final term project) Exceeds Expectation> EMBA - Trend: Student‟s performance and in enterprise 80% 22 has improved over the period management. with an increase in percentage Course-Embedded of students meeting and Assessment: Rubric # exceeding expectations. EM.5.1.1.1

EMBA PLG 5; SLO 5.1; Spring 2018; Summative EMBA PLG 5; SLO 5.1; Summative; Trend M=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expectation 100 100 77.71 80 80 62.04 60 60 37.96 60 40 25 15 14.4 40 20 7.89

Percentages Percentages Students of 0 0 20 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2018 SP 2017 SP 2017 SP 2018 SP

0 MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXCEED EXPECTATION M D E EXPECTATION

Figure EMBA - 21 Figure EMBA - 22