AIRCRAFT NAVIGATION and SURVEILLANCE ANALYSIS for a SPHERICAL EARTH Michael Geyer

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AIRCRAFT NAVIGATION and SURVEILLANCE ANALYSIS for a SPHERICAL EARTH Michael Geyer AIRCRAFT NAVIGATION AND SURVEILLANCE ANALYSIS FOR A SPHERICAL EARTH Michael Geyer S π/2 - α - θ d h α N U Re Re θ O Boeing Michael Geyer Navigation Vertical Plane Model Boeing Peter Mercator Federico Rostagno Spherical Surface Model Surveillance Project Memorandum — October 2014 DOT-VNTSC-FAA-15-01 Prepared for: Federal Aviation Administration Wake Turbulence Research Office DOT Volpe Center FOREWORD This memorandum addresses a basic function of aircraft (as well as marine, missile and satellite) surveillance and navigation systems analyses — quantifying the geometric relationship of two or more locations relative to each other and to a spherical earth. Here, geometry simply means distances (ranges) and angles. Applications that fit well with the methods presented herein include (a) planning a vehicle’s route; (b) determining the coverage region of a radar or radio navigation installation; or (c) calculating a vehicle’s position from slant-ranges, spherical-ranges, slant- or spherical-range differences, azimuth/elevation angles and/or altitude. The approach advocated is that, to simplify and clarify the analysis process, the three-dimen- sional problems inherent in navigation and surveillance analyses should, to the extent possible, be re-cast as the most appropriate set/sequence of sub-problems/formulations: . Vertical-Plane Formulation (two-dimensional (2D) problem illustrated in top right panel on cover) — Considers the vertical plane containing two problem-specific locations and the center of the earth, and utilizes plane trigonometry as the primary analysis method; provides a closed-form solution. Spherical-Surface Formulation (2D problem illustrated in bottom left panel on cover) — Considers two or three problem-specific locations on the surface of a spherical earth; utilizes spherical trigonometry as the primary analysis method; provides a closed-form solution. Three-Dimensional Vector Formulation — Utilizes 3D Cartesian vector frame- work; best-suited to situations involving four or more problem-specific points and slant-range or slant-range difference measurements; provides a closed-form solution. Linearized Least-Squares Iterative Formulation — When warranted by the distan- ces involved, the accuracy required, and/or the need to incorporate empirical data, the least-squares iterative method is employed based on an ellipsoidal earth model. These techniques are applied to a series of increasing complex situations, starting with those having two problem-specific points, then extending to those involving three or more problem- specific points (e.g., two or more sensor stations and an aircraft). Closed-form (non-iterative) solutions are presented for determining an aircraft’s position based on virtually every possible combination of ranges, pseudoranges, azimuth or elevation angles and altitude measurements. The Gauss-Newton Linearized Least-Squares (LLS) iterative methodology is employed to address the most complex situations. These include any combination of the following circum- stances: more measurements than unknown variables, measurement equations are too complex to be analytically inverted (including those for an ellipsoidal-shaped earth), or empirical data is utilized in the solution. Also, the capability of the LLS methodology to provide an estimate of the accuracy of any solution to the measurement equations is presented. i DOT Volpe Center TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD.................................................................................................................... I 1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Overview of Methodologies and Their Applications ..................................................... 1 1.1.1 Overview of Methodologies ........................................................................................................1 1.1.2 Overview of Application of Methodologies................................................................................2 1.2 Vertical Plane Formulation.............................................................................................. 3 1.3 Spherical Surface Formulation........................................................................................ 3 1.4 Applicability and Limitations of Analysis ...................................................................... 5 1.5 Outline of this Document.................................................................................................. 6 2. MATHEMATICS AND PHYSICS BASICS............................................................... 8 2.1 Exact and Approximate Solutions to Common Equations ........................................... 8 2.1.1 The Law of Sines for Plane Triangles .........................................................................................8 2.1.2 The Law of Cosines for Plane Triangles .....................................................................................8 2.1.3 Solution of a Quadratic Equation ................................................................................................9 2.1.4 Computing Inverse Trigonometric Functions..............................................................................9 2.1.5 Expansions of arcsin, arccos and arctan for Small Angles........................................................11 2.1.6 Secant Method for Root Finding ...............................................................................................12 2.1.7 Surface Area on a Sphere ..........................................................................................................13 2.2 Shape of the Earth .......................................................................................................... 13 2.2.1 WGS-84 Ellipsoid Parameters...................................................................................................13 2.2.2 Radii of Curvature in the Meridian and the Prime Vertical.......................................................14 2.2.3 Methods for Addressing an Ellipsoidal Earth............................................................................16 2.3 Accounting for User Altitude......................................................................................... 17 2.3.1 Accounting for Known User Altitude .......................................................................................17 2.3.2 Conditions for Unblocked Line-of-Sight...................................................................................17 3. TWO-POINT / VERTICAL-PLANE PROBLEM FORMULATION .......................... 20 3.1 Mathematical Problem and Solution Taxonomy ......................................................... 20 3.1.1 Mathematical Formulation ........................................................................................................20 3.1.2 Taxonomy of Solution Approaches...........................................................................................20 3.1.3 Detailed Geometry.....................................................................................................................21 3.2 Computing Geocentric Angle......................................................................................... 22 3.2.1 Altitude and Elevation Angle Known – Basic Method .............................................................22 3.2.2 Altitude and Elevation Angle Known – Alternative Method ....................................................23 3.2.3 Altitude and Slant Range Known ..............................................................................................23 3.2.4 Elevation Angle and Slant Range Known .................................................................................24 3.3 Computing Elevation Angle........................................................................................... 24 3.3.1 Altitude and Geocentric Angle Known .....................................................................................24 3.3.2 Altitude and Slant Range Known ..............................................................................................25 3.3.3 Geocentric Angle and Slant Range Known...............................................................................25 3.4 Computing Slant Range ................................................................................................. 25 3.4.1 Altitude and Geocentric Angle Known .....................................................................................25 3.4.2 Altitude and Elevation Angle Known .......................................................................................26 ii DOT Volpe Center 3.4.3 Geocentric Angle and Elevation Angle Known ........................................................................26 3.5 Computing Altitude ........................................................................................................ 27 3.5.1 Slant Range and Geocentric Angle Known...............................................................................27 3.5.2 Slant Range and Elevation Angle Known .................................................................................27 3.5.3 Elevation Angle and Geocentric Angle Known ........................................................................27 3.6 Example Applications..................................................................................................... 28 3.6.1 Example 1: En Route Radar Coverage .....................................................................................28
Recommended publications
  • Glossary Glossary
    Glossary Glossary Albedo A measure of an object’s reflectivity. A pure white reflecting surface has an albedo of 1.0 (100%). A pitch-black, nonreflecting surface has an albedo of 0.0. The Moon is a fairly dark object with a combined albedo of 0.07 (reflecting 7% of the sunlight that falls upon it). The albedo range of the lunar maria is between 0.05 and 0.08. The brighter highlands have an albedo range from 0.09 to 0.15. Anorthosite Rocks rich in the mineral feldspar, making up much of the Moon’s bright highland regions. Aperture The diameter of a telescope’s objective lens or primary mirror. Apogee The point in the Moon’s orbit where it is furthest from the Earth. At apogee, the Moon can reach a maximum distance of 406,700 km from the Earth. Apollo The manned lunar program of the United States. Between July 1969 and December 1972, six Apollo missions landed on the Moon, allowing a total of 12 astronauts to explore its surface. Asteroid A minor planet. A large solid body of rock in orbit around the Sun. Banded crater A crater that displays dusky linear tracts on its inner walls and/or floor. 250 Basalt A dark, fine-grained volcanic rock, low in silicon, with a low viscosity. Basaltic material fills many of the Moon’s major basins, especially on the near side. Glossary Basin A very large circular impact structure (usually comprising multiple concentric rings) that usually displays some degree of flooding with lava. The largest and most conspicuous lava- flooded basins on the Moon are found on the near side, and most are filled to their outer edges with mare basalts.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Chapter 3 Plane and Spherical Trigonometry 3.1
    1 CHAPTER 3 PLANE AND SPHERICAL TRIGONOMETRY 3.1 Introduction It is assumed in this chapter that readers are familiar with the usual elementary formulas encountered in introductory trigonometry. We start the chapter with a brief review of the solution of a plane triangle. While most of this will be familiar to readers, it is suggested that it be not skipped over entirely, because the examples in it contain some cautionary notes concerning hidden pitfalls. This is followed by a quick review of spherical coordinates and direction cosines in three- dimensional geometry. The formulas for the velocity and acceleration components in two- dimensional polar coordinates and three-dimensional spherical coordinates are developed in section 3.4. Section 3.5 deals with the trigonometric formulas for solving spherical triangles. This is a fairly long section, and it will be essential reading for those who are contemplating making a start on celestial mechanics. Sections 3.6 and 3.7 deal with the rotation of axes in two and three dimensions, including Eulerian angles and the rotation matrix of direction cosines. Finally, in section 3.8, a number of commonly encountered trigonometric formulas are gathered for reference. 3.2 Plane Triangles . This section is to serve as a brief reminder of how to solve a plane triangle. While there may be a temptation to pass rapidly over this section, it does contain a warning that will become even more pertinent in the section on spherical triangles. Conventionally, a plane triangle is described by its three angles A, B, C and three sides a, b, c, with a being opposite to A, b opposite to B, and c opposite to C.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Oral History Off Ice University of California the Bancroft Library Berkeley, California
    Regional Oral History Off ice University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California Richard B. Gump COMPOSER, ARTIST, AND PRESIDENT OF GUMP'S, SAN FRANCISCO An Interview Conducted by Suzanne B. Riess in 1987 Copyright @ 1989 by The Regents of the University of California Since 1954 the Regional Oral History Office has been interviewing leading participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development of Northern California, the West,and the Nation. Oral history is a modern research technique involving an interviewee and an informed interviewer in spontaneous conversation. The taped record is transcribed, lightly edited for continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The resulting manuscript is typed in final form, indexed, bound with photographs and illustrative materials, and placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between the University of California and Richard B. Gump dated 7 March 1988. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley. No part of the manuscript may be quoted for publication without the written permission of the Director of The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • 187 Part 87—Aviation Services
    Federal Communications Commission Pt. 87 the ship aboard which the ship earth determination purposes under the fol- station is to be installed and operated. lowing conditions: (b) A station license for a portable (1) The radio transmitting equipment ship earth station may be issued to the attached to the cable-marker buoy as- owner or operator of portable earth sociated with the ship station must be station equipment proposing to furnish described in the station application; satellite communication services on (2) The call sign used for the trans- board more than one ship or fixed off- mitter operating under the provisions shore platform located in the marine of this section is the call sign of the environment. ship station followed by the letters ``BT'' and the identifying number of [52 FR 27003, July 17, 1987, as amended at 54 the buoy. FR 49995, Dec. 4, 1989] (3) The buoy transmitter must be § 80.1187 Scope of communication. continuously monitored by a licensed radiotelegraph operator on board the Ship earth stations must be used for cable repair ship station; and telecommunications related to the (4) The transmitter must operate business or operation of ships and for under the provisions in § 80.375(b). public correspondence of persons on board. Portable ship earth stations are authorized to meet the business, oper- PART 87ÐAVIATION SERVICES ational and public correspondence tele- communication needs of fixed offshore Subpart AÐGeneral Information platforms located in the marine envi- Sec. ronment as well as ships. The types of 87.1 Basis and purpose. emission are determined by the 87.3 Other applicable rule parts.
    [Show full text]
  • America the Beautiful Part 1
    America the Beautiful Part 1 Charlene Notgrass 1 America the Beautiful Part 1 by Charlene Notgrass ISBN 978-1-60999-141-8 Copyright © 2020 Notgrass Company. All rights reserved. All product names, brands, and other trademarks mentioned or pictured in this book are used for educational purposes only. No association with or endorsement by the owners of the trademarks is intended. Each trademark remains the property of its respective owner. Unless otherwise noted, scripture quotations are taken from the New American Standard Bible®, Copyright © 1960, 1962, 1963, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995 by the Lockman Foundation. All rights reserved. Used by permission. Cover Images: Jordan Pond, Maine, background by Dave Ashworth / Shutterstock.com; Deer’s Hair by George Catlin / Smithsonian American Art Museum; Young Girl and Dog by Percy Moran / Smithsonian American Art Museum; William Lee from George Washington and William Lee by John Trumbull / Metropolitan Museum of Art. Back Cover Author Photo: Professional Portraits by Kevin Wimpy The image on the preceding page is of Denali in Denali National Park. No part of this material may be reproduced without permission from the publisher. You may not photocopy this book. If you need additional copies for children in your family or for students in your group or classroom, contact Notgrass History to order them. Printed in the United States of America. Notgrass History 975 Roaring River Rd. Gainesboro, TN 38562 1-800-211-8793 notgrass.com Thunder Rocks, Allegany State Park, New York Dear Student When God created the land we call America, He sculpted and painted a masterpiece.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission § 80.110
    SUBCHAPTER D—SAFETY AND SPECIAL RADIO SERVICES PART 80—STATIONS IN THE 80.71 Operating controls for stations on land. MARITIME SERVICES 80.72 Antenna requirements for coast sta- tions. Subpart A—General Information 80.74 Public coast station facilities for a te- lephony busy signal. GENERAL 80.76 Requirements for land station control Sec. points. 80.1 Basis and purpose. 80.2 Other regulations that apply. STATION REQUIREMENTS—SHIP STATIONS 80.3 Other applicable rule parts of this chap- 80.79 Inspection of ship station by a foreign ter. Government. 80.5 Definitions. 80.80 Operating controls for ship stations. 80.7 Incorporation by reference. 80.81 Antenna requirements for ship sta- tions. Subpart B—Applications and Licenses 80.83 Protection from potentially hazardous RF radiation. 80.11 Scope. 80.13 Station license required. OPERATING PROCEDURES—GENERAL 80.15 Eligibility for station license. 80.17 Administrative classes of stations. 80.86 International regulations applicable. 80.21 Supplemental information required. 80.87 Cooperative use of frequency assign- 80.25 License term. ments. 80.31 Cancellation of license. 80.88 Secrecy of communication. 80.37 One authorization for a plurality of 80.89 Unauthorized transmissions. stations. 80.90 Suspension of transmission. 80.39 Authorized station location. 80.91 Order of priority of communications. 80.41 Control points and dispatch points. 80.92 Prevention of interference. 80.43 Equipment acceptable for licensing. 80.93 Hours of service. 80.45 Frequencies. 80.94 Control by coast or Government sta- 80.47 Operation during emergency. tion. 80.49 Construction and regional service re- 80.95 Message charges.
    [Show full text]
  • Spherical Trigonometry
    Spherical trigonometry 1 The spherical Pythagorean theorem Proposition 1.1 On a sphere of radius R, any right triangle 4ABC with \C being the right angle satisfies cos(c=R) = cos(a=R) cos(b=R): (1) Proof: Let O be the center of the sphere, we may assume its coordinates are (0; 0; 0). We may rotate −! the sphere so that A has coordinates OA = (R; 0; 0) and C lies in the xy-plane, see Figure 1. Rotating z B y O(0; 0; 0) C A(R; 0; 0) x Figure 1: The Pythagorean theorem for a spherical right triangle around the z axis by β := AOC takes A into C. The edge OA moves in the xy-plane, by β, thus −−!\ the coordinates of C are OC = (R cos(β);R sin(β); 0). Since we have a right angle at C, the plane of 4OBC is perpendicular to the plane of 4OAC and it contains the z axis. An orthonormal basis −−! −! of the plane of 4OBC is given by 1=R · OC = (cos(β); sin(β); 0) and the vector OZ := (0; 0; 1). A rotation around O in this plane by α := \BOC takes C into B: −−! −−! −! OB = cos(α) · OC + sin(α) · R · OZ = (R cos(β) cos(α);R sin(β) cos(α);R sin(α)): Introducing γ := \AOB, we have −! −−! OA · OB R2 cos(α) cos(β) cos(γ) = = : R2 R2 The statement now follows from α = a=R, β = b=R and γ = c=R. ♦ To prove the rest of the formulas of spherical trigonometry, we need to show the following.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I Lunar and Martian Nomenclature
    APPENDIX I LUNAR AND MARTIAN NOMENCLATURE LUNAR AND MARTIAN NOMENCLATURE A large number of names of craters and other features on the Moon and Mars, were accepted by the IAU General Assemblies X (Moscow, 1958), XI (Berkeley, 1961), XII (Hamburg, 1964), XIV (Brighton, 1970), and XV (Sydney, 1973). The names were suggested by the appropriate IAU Commissions (16 and 17). In particular the Lunar names accepted at the XIVth and XVth General Assemblies were recommended by the 'Working Group on Lunar Nomenclature' under the Chairmanship of Dr D. H. Menzel. The Martian names were suggested by the 'Working Group on Martian Nomenclature' under the Chairmanship of Dr G. de Vaucouleurs. At the XVth General Assembly a new 'Working Group on Planetary System Nomenclature' was formed (Chairman: Dr P. M. Millman) comprising various Task Groups, one for each particular subject. For further references see: [AU Trans. X, 259-263, 1960; XIB, 236-238, 1962; Xlffi, 203-204, 1966; xnffi, 99-105, 1968; XIVB, 63, 129, 139, 1971; Space Sci. Rev. 12, 136-186, 1971. Because at the recent General Assemblies some small changes, or corrections, were made, the complete list of Lunar and Martian Topographic Features is published here. Table 1 Lunar Craters Abbe 58S,174E Balboa 19N,83W Abbot 6N,55E Baldet 54S, 151W Abel 34S,85E Balmer 20S,70E Abul Wafa 2N,ll7E Banachiewicz 5N,80E Adams 32S,69E Banting 26N,16E Aitken 17S,173E Barbier 248, 158E AI-Biruni 18N,93E Barnard 30S,86E Alden 24S, lllE Barringer 29S,151W Aldrin I.4N,22.1E Bartels 24N,90W Alekhin 68S,131W Becquerei
    [Show full text]
  • The Composition of the Lunar Crust: Radiative Transfer Modeling and Analysis of Lunar Visible and Near-Infrared Spectra
    THE COMPOSITION OF THE LUNAR CRUST: RADIATIVE TRANSFER MODELING AND ANALYSIS OF LUNAR VISIBLE AND NEAR-INFRARED SPECTRA A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS DECEMBER 2009 By Joshua T.S. Cahill Dissertation Committee: Paul G. Lucey, Chairperson G. Jeffrey Taylor Patricia Fryer Jeffrey J. Gillis-Davis Trevor Sorensen Student: Joshua T.S. Cahill Student ID#: 1565-1460 Field: Geology and Geophysics Graduation date: December 2009 Title: The Composition of the Lunar Crust: Radiative Transfer Modeling and Analysis of Lunar Visible and Near-Infrared Spectra We certify that we have read this dissertation and that, in our opinion, it is satisfactory in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geology and Geophysics. Dissertation Committee: Names Signatures Paul G. Lucey, Chairperson ____________________________ G. Jeffrey Taylor ____________________________ Jeffrey J. Gillis-Davis ____________________________ Patricia Fryer ____________________________ Trevor Sorensen ____________________________ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I must first express my love and appreciation to my family. Thank you to my wife Karen for providing love, support, and perspective. And to our little girl Maggie who only recently became part of our family and has already provided priceless memories in the form of beautiful smiles, belly laughs, and little bear hugs. The two of you provided me with the most meaningful reasons to push towards the "finish line". I would also like to thank my immediate and extended family. Many of them do not fully understand much about what I do, but support the endeavor acknowledging that if it is something I’m willing to put this much effort into, it must be worthwhile.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Aircraft-Based Observations
    Guide to Aircraft-based Observations 2017 edition WEATHER CLIMATE WATER CLIMATE WEATHER WMO-No. 1200 Guide to Aircraft-based Observations 2017 edition WMO-No. 1200 EDITORIAL NOTE METEOTERM, the WMO terminology database, may be consulted at http://public.wmo.int/en/ resources/meteoterm. Readers who copy hyperlinks by selecting them in the text should be aware that additional spaces may appear immediately following http://, https://, ftp://, mailto:, and after slashes (/), dashes (-), periods (.) and unbroken sequences of characters (letters and numbers). These spaces should be removed from the pasted URL. The correct URL is displayed when hovering over the link or when clicking on the link and then copying it from the browser. WMO-No. 1200 © World Meteorological Organization, 2017 The right of publication in print, electronic and any other form and in any language is reserved by WMO. Short extracts from WMO publications may be reproduced without authorization, provided that the complete source is clearly indicated. Editorial correspondence and requests to publish, reproduce or translate this publication in part or in whole should be addressed to: Chairperson, Publications Board World Meteorological Organization (WMO) 7 bis, avenue de la Paix Tel.: +41 (0) 22 730 84 03 P.O. Box 2300 Fax: +41 (0) 22 730 81 17 CH-1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland Email: [email protected] ISBN 978-92-63-11200-2 NOTE The designations employed in WMO publications and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WMO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Class of Stations
    CLASS OF STATION FOR FIXED AND MOBILE NOTIFICATION Service code Station Description/Definition Fixed FX Fixed Station Station in the Fixed Service Station in the mobile service not intended to be used while FL Land station Generic Mobile in motion Station in the mobile service intended to be used while in MO Mobile station motion or during halts at unspecified points FB Base station Land station in the land mobile service Land Mobile ML Land mobile station Mobile station in the land mobile service FC Coast station Land station in the maritime mobile service FP Port station Coast station in the port operations service Maritime Mobile MS Ship station Mobile station in the maritime mobile service OE Oceanographic data interrogation station Oceanographic data interrogation station OD Oceanographic data station Oceanographic data station Generic FA Aeronautical station Land station in the aeronautical mobile service Aeronautical mobile MA Aircraft station Mobile station in the aeronautical mobile service Aeronautical mobile Route FD Aeronautical station Land station in the aeronautical mobile (R) service Aeronautical mobile Off FG Aeronautical station Land station in the aeronautical mobile (OR) service Route RN Radionavigation land station Land station in the radionavigation service Generic Radionavigation NR Radionavigation mobile station Mobile station in the radionavigation service NL Maritime radionavigation land station Land station in the maritime radionavigation service Maritime Radionavigation RM Maritime radionavigation mobile station
    [Show full text]
  • The Sphere of the Earth Description and Technical Manual
    The Sphere of the Earth Description and Technical Manual December 20, 2012 Daniel Ramos ∗ MMACA (Museu de Matem`atiquesde Catalunya) 1 The exhibit The exhibit we are presenting explores the science of cartography and the geometry of the sphere. Althoug this subject has been widely treated on science exhibitions and fairs, our proposal aims to be a more comprehensive and complete treatment on the subject, as well as to be a fully open source, documented material that both museographers and public can experience, learn and modify. The key concept comes from the problem of representing the spherical surface of the Earth onto a flat map. Studying this problem is the subject of cartography, and has been an important mathematical problem in History (navigation, position, frontiers, land ownership...). An essential theorem in Geometry (Gauss' Egregium theorem) ensures that there is no perfect map, that is, there is no way of repre- senting the Earth keeping distances at scale. However, this is exactly what makes cartography a discipline: developing several different maps that try to solve well enough the problem of representing the Earth. A common activity is comparing an Earth globe with a (Mercator) map, observ- ing that distances are not preserved. Our module explores far beyond that. We present: • Several different maps, currently 6 map projections are used, each one featuring different special properties. Printed at nominal scale 1:1 of a model globe. • The script programs that generate these pictures. Generating a map takes less than 50 lines of code, anyone could generate his own. ∗E-mail: [email protected] 1 • A collection of tools and models: a flexible ruler to be used over the globe, plane and spherical protractors, models showing longitude and latitude..
    [Show full text]