DOCSLIB.ORG

A Flexible, Modular Approach to Integrated Space Exploration Campaign Logistics Modeling, Simulation, and Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A FLEXIBLE, MODULAR APPROACH TO INTEGRATED SPACE EXPLORATION CAMPAIGN LOGISTICS MODELING, SIMULATION, AND ANALYSIS by Paul Thomas Grogan B.S. Engineering Mechanics and Astronautics University of Wisconsin, 2008 Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics in partial fulfillment of the requirements to the degree of Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY September 2010 © Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved. Signature of Author………………………………………………………………………………… Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics July 30, 2010 Certified by………………………………………………………………………………………… Olivier L. de Weck Associate Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics and of Engineering Systems Thesis Supervisor Accepted by………………………………………………………………………………………... Eytan H. Modiano Associate Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Chair, Committee on Graduate Students Abstract A space logistics modeling framework to support space exploration to remote environments is the target of research within the MIT Space Logistics Project. This thesis presents a revised and expanded framework providing capabilities to analyze a new set of explorations using a generalized resource flow through a time-expanded network to satisfy exploration demands. The framework is both flexible to model a wide range of destinations using mixed levels of fidelity and modular to enable future expansion through interfaces. The SpaceNet software tool implements the space logistics modeling framework, providing integrated modeling and simulation capabilities for quantitative space exploration campaign analysis. Discrete event simulation identifies logistical infeasibilities and provides quantitative measures of exploration effectiveness to guide trade studies or other campaign analyses. SpaceNet 2.5, a Java executable with an extensive graphical user interface, has been publicly released under an open source license. Four case studies are presented as examples of the modeling framework applied to relevant exploration campaigns. A resupply of the International Space Station from 2010-2015 includes 77 flights of seven different vehicles from six launch sites to investigate the supply capacity under existing resupply strategies. A near-Earth asteroid exploration details a two crew, 14-day tele-operated mission at 1999- AO10 to establish the feasibility requirements of using modified Constellation vehicle architectures. A lunar outpost exploration models the buildup of infrastructure and surface excursions leading to continuous human presence over 21 missions and seven years. Finally, a Mars surface exploration models the ten launches and in-space nuclear thermal rocket propulsion required to send a crew of four to the surface of Mars for a 531-day exploration. Finally, a usability experiment is presented to demonstrate the usability and efficiency of the SpaceNet tool as compared to independent analysis methods. Seven test subjects were tested, five using SpaceNet and two control subjects using spreadsheet-based methods, to analyze and establish the feasibility of a near-Earth object mission. The median SpaceNet subject required 35 minutes to complete the analysis, compared to a median of 113 minutes for the control subjects. Thesis Supervisor: Olivier L. de Weck Title: Associate Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics and of Engineering Systems 3 (This Page Intentionally Blank) 4 Acknowledgements There are many individuals in need of recognition for their substantial impact on this project. First, I would like to thank Prof. Olivier de Weck for his advising and mentoring over the past two years. He has generously supported both my academic and professional development by providing countless opportunities to participate in projects, committees, conferences, and meetings, all of which have dramatically supplemented my research. I would be lost without the help of my family and closest friends. I would like to thank my father Tom for encouraging me to always accept new challenges, my mother Kathy for showing what is truly important in life, my sister Sarah for her selfless attitude, and my brother Brian for his loyal companionship. Special recognition is reserved for Natasha Lewis, for whom frequent visits are the least I can offer for the support she has provided. A substantial portion of this project is built on the work of others. In particular, I would like to recognize Nii Armar, Sarah Shull, and Afreen Siddiqi for their development contributions within the space logistics modeling framework. Also, I would like to thank my colleagues at MIT for their collaboration and assistance in case study development and usability testing. In particular, I would like to thank Ariane Chepko, Torin Clark, Ben Corbin, Ivo Ferreira, Alessandro Golkar, Jennifer Green, Abe Grindle, Arthur Guest, Tak Ishimatsu, Justin Kaderka, Greg O‟Neill, Basant Sagar, Narek Shougarian, Daniel Selva, Anthony Wicht, and Howard Yue. A portion my involvement was supported by NASA Strategic University Research Partnership (SURP) contract number 1344341. Our contacts at JPL including Gene Lee, Elizabeth Jordan, and Dr. Robert Shishko provided tremendous expertise and were instrumental in guiding the project in the right direction. This thesis is dedicated to the memory of my grandfather, Prof. Paul J. Grogan (1918-2008). He served as an inspiration from my earliest childhood and contributed greatly to my love of mathematics applied through engineering. 5 (This Page Intentionally Blank) 6 Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 14 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................. 15 1.1.1 The Vision for Space Exploration ....................................................................................... 15 1.1.2 MIT Space Logistics Project ............................................................................................... 16 1.1.3 Human Space Flight Review ............................................................................................... 17 1.2 Project Motivation ...................................................................................................................... 17 1.2.1 Space Logistics “-ilities” ..................................................................................................... 18 1.2.2 Flexible Modeling Framework ............................................................................................ 18 1.2.3 Modular Implementation Architecture ................................................................................ 20 1.2.4 User Community ................................................................................................................. 22 1.3 Related Research and Literature ................................................................................................. 22 1.4 Project Overview ........................................................................................................................ 23 2 Domain Model .................................................................................................................................. 25 2.1 Network Components Model ...................................................................................................... 25 2.1.1 Nodes .................................................................................................................................. 25 2.1.2 Edges ................................................................................................................................... 27 2.2 Resource Model .......................................................................................................................... 28 2.3 Element Model ............................................................................................................................ 31 2.3.1 Element Hierarchy .............................................................................................................. 31 2.3.2 Element Parts ...................................................................................................................... 34 2.3.3 Element States ..................................................................................................................... 34 2.3.4 Element Demand Models .................................................................................................... 35 3 Campaign Modeling and Analysis .................................................................................................. 39 3.1 Network Model ........................................................................................................................... 39 3.2 Mission Model ............................................................................................................................ 40 3.2.1 Mission Demand Models .................................................................................................... 40 3.2.2 Mission Events .................................................................................................................... 40 3.2.3 Spatial Simulator ................................................................................................................. 43 3.3 Manifest Model ..........................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Spring 2018 Undergraduate Law Journal

    Spring 2018 Undergraduate Law Journal

    SPRING 2018 UNDERGRADUATE LAW JOURNAL The Final Frontier: Evolution of Space Law in a Global Society By: Garett Faulkender and Stephan Schneider Introduction “Space: the final frontier!” These are the famous introductory words spoken by William Shatner on every episode of Star Trek. This science-fiction TV show has gained a cult-following with its premise as a futuristic Space odyssey. Originally released in 1966, many saw the portrayed future filled with Space-travel, inter-planetary commerce and politics, and futuristic technology as merely a dream. However, today we are starting to explore this frontier. “We are entering an exciting era in [S]pace where we expect more advances in the next few decades than throughout human history.”1 Bank of America/Merrill Lynch has predicted that the Space industry will grow to over $2.7 trillion over the next three decades. Its report said, “a new raft of drivers is pushing the ‘Space Age 2.0’”.2 Indeed, this market has seen start-up investments in the range of $16 billion,3 helping fund impressive new companies like Virgin Galactic and SpaceX. There is certainly a market as Virgin Galactic says more than 600 customers have registered for a $250,000 suborbital trip, including Leonardo DiCaprio, Katy Perry, Ashton Kutcher, and physicist Stephen Hawking.4 Although Space-tourism is the exciting face of a future in Space, the Space industry has far more to offer. According to the Satellite Industries 1 Michael Sheetz, The Space Industry Will Be Worth Nearly $3 Trillion in 30 Years, Bank of America Predicts, CNBC, (last updated Oct.
  • Gnc 2021 Abstract Book

    Gnc 2021 Abstract Book

    GNC 2021 ABSTRACT BOOK Contents GNC Posters ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Poster 01: A Software Defined Radio Galileo and GPS SW receiver for real-time on-board Navigation for space missions ................................................................................................................................................. 7 Poster 02: JUICE Navigation camera design .................................................................................................... 9 Poster 03: PRESENTATION AND PERFORMANCES OF MULTI-CONSTELLATION GNSS ORBITAL NAVIGATION LIBRARY BOLERO ........................................................................................................................................... 10 Poster 05: EROSS Project - GNC architecture design for autonomous robotic On-Orbit Servicing .............. 12 Poster 06: Performance assessment of a multispectral sensor for relative navigation ............................... 14 Poster 07: Validation of Astrix 1090A IMU for interplanetary and landing missions ................................... 16 Poster 08: High Performance Control System Architecture with an Output Regulation Theory-based Controller and Two-Stage Optimal Observer for the Fine Pointing of Large Scientific Satellites ................. 18 Poster 09: Development of High-Precision GPSR Applicable to GEO and GTO-to-GEO Transfer ................. 20 Poster 10: P4COM: ESA Pointing Error Engineering
  • International Space Station Permanent Multi-Purpose Module (PMM) Life Extension

    International Space Station Permanent Multi-Purpose Module (PMM) Life Extension

    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20120016610 2019-08-30T23:14:32+00:00Z International Space Station Permanent Multi-purpose Module (PMM) Life Extension 2011 Software And Systems Engineering Forum Acquisition Of System Integration And Software Products May 10-11, 2011 Kathy U. Jones NASA-MSFC Mailcode:ES11 256-544-3654 ISS Pressurized Logistics Resupply and Return Element: The Multipurpose Logistics Module (MPLM) • The International Space Station first United States element launch was the Unity Node (Node 1) in December 1998 (STS88) which docked to the Russian built Zarya (FGB) element. • All U.S. pressurized modules, truss segments, solar arrays, radiators, etc., as well as the European and Japanese pressurized modules have been launched within the Space Shuttle Orbiter’s cargo bay and assembled/integrated on orbit. • The International Space Station has been continuously occupied for over ten years (since November 2000). • Three Multipurpose Logistics Module (MPLM) were designed and built by the Italian Space Agency and delivered to NASA in 1998-1999 to deliver and return pressurized cargo to and from the station via the Shuttle Orbiter. • The MPLM Flight Module #1, was named “Leonardo” after the famous Italian artist Leonardo DaVinci. Leonardo has been an integral part of the International Space Station since its first resupply flight in March 2001 on STS102. ISS after STS102/5A.1 mission Leonardo in Module Rotation ISS after STS133/ULF5 mission Stand at KSC Photo source: http://io.jsc.nasa.gov 2 Leonardo Module Flight History • To date, there have been 10 MPLM missions. Seven of these were using the Leonardo Flight Module #1 (FM1) and three using the Raffaello Flight Module #2 (FM2).
  • ARC-OVER April

    ARC-OVER April

    April Upcoming Events Next Board Meeting: May 6 Next General Meeting: May 12 Field Day: June 27 & 28 Pacificon: October 16 - 18 Dayton Hamvention May 15 TARC Meeting April 14, 2015 Turlock, War Memorial 7:00 p.m. Ron Roos, KJ6KNL, Our honorable President, called the meeting to order Pledge of Allegiance, All members and guests introduced themselves. Dylan Low, KK6SYD, was a first time guest. All were welcomed. Dick Decker, Vice President, K6SUU, gave an interesting presentation on Hams In Space. This was the topic members showed the most interest in. Fox 1 will launch on August 27th, 2015. To contact Space Stations in the past the Uplink was on VHF and the Downlink on UHF. This is now reversed, the Uplink will be UHF and the Downlink will be VHF. For a full copy of the Powerpoint Presentation, Dick announced that those interested could send an email to him and he would send it to those requesting it. Included in the Powerpoint will be the links for further information. Dick explained that Space stations were easier to use than Satellites. A variety of antennas were shown and discussed. They included; The Yagi, Two Elk Antennas (mounted on PVC) and one that really measured up; The Tape Measure Antenna. Dick informed all that he has a radio that members could use to hit the Space Station. Please contact him if you are interested. The process is pretty simple and it is rewarding when you get your card back in the mail! Dick’s email is; [email protected] 1 Ron Roos, asked members if they had read the minutes from our March 10th Meeting.
  • IAF-01-T.1.O1 Progress on the International Space Station

    IAF-01-T.1.O1 Progress on the International Space Station

    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20150020985 2019-08-31T05:38:38+00:00Z IAF-01-T.1.O1 Progress on the International Space Station - We're Part Way up the Mountain John-David F. Bartoe and Thomas Holloway NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas, USA The first phase of the International Space Station construction has been completed, and research has begun. Russian, U.S., and Canadian hardware is on orbit, ard Italian logistics modules have visited often. With the delivery of the U.S. Laboratory, Destiny, significant research capability is in place, and dozens of U.S. and Russian experiments have been conducted. Crew members have been on orbit continuously since November 2000. Several "bumps in the road" have occurred along the way, and each has been systematically overcome. Enormous amounts of hardware and software are being developed by the International Space Station partners and participants around the world and are largely on schedule for launch. Significant progress has been made in the testing of completed elements at launch sites in the United States and Kazakhstan. Over 250,000 kg of flight hardware have been delivered to the Kennedy Space Center and integrated testing of several elements wired together has progressed extremely well. Mission control centers are fully functioning in Houston, Moscow, and Canada, and operations centers Darmstadt, Tsukuba, Turino, and Huntsville will be going on line as they are required. Extensive coordination efforts continue among the space agencies of the five partners and two participants, involving 16 nations. All of them continue to face their own challenges and have achieved significant successes.
  • The J–2X Engine Powering NASA’S Ares I Upper Stage and Ares V Earth Departure Stage

    The J–2X Engine Powering NASA’S Ares I Upper Stage and Ares V Earth Departure Stage

    The J–2X Engine Powering NASA’s Ares I Upper Stage and Ares V Earth Departure Stage The U.S. launch vehicles that will carry nozzle. It will weigh approximately 5,300 explorers back to the moon will be powered pounds. With 294,000 pounds of thrust, the in part by a J–2X engine that draws its engine will enable the Ares I upper stage to heritage from the Apollo-Saturn Program. place the Orion crew exploration vehicle in low-Earth orbit. The new engine, being designed and devel­ oped in support of NASA’s Constellation The J–2X is being designed by Pratt & Program, will power the upper stages of Whitney Rocketdyne of Canoga Park, Calif., both the Ares I crew launch vehicle and Ares for the Exploration Launch Projects Office at V cargo launch vehicle. NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Ala. The J–2X builds on the The Constellation Program is responsible for legacy of the Apollo-Saturn Program and developing a new family of U.S. crew and relies on nearly a half-century of NASA launch vehicles and related systems and spaceflight experience, heritage hardware technologies for exploration of the moon, and technological advances. Mars and destinations beyond. Fueled with liquid oxygen and liquid hydro­ The J–2X will measure 185 inches long and gen, the J–2X is an evolved variation of two 120 inches in diameter at the end of its historic predecessors: the powerful J–2 upper stage engine that propelled the Apollo-era Shortly after J–2X engine cutoff, the Orion capsule will Saturn IB and Saturn V rockets to the moon in the separate from the upper stage.
  • Planned Yet Uncontrolled Re-Entries of the Cluster-Ii Spacecraft

    Planned Yet Uncontrolled Re-Entries of the Cluster-Ii Spacecraft

    PLANNED YET UNCONTROLLED RE-ENTRIES OF THE CLUSTER-II SPACECRAFT Stijn Lemmens(1), Klaus Merz(1), Quirin Funke(1) , Benoit Bonvoisin(2), Stefan Löhle(3), Henrik Simon(1) (1) European Space Agency, Space Debris Office, Robert-Bosch-Straße 5, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany, Email:[email protected] (2) European Space Agency, Materials & Processes Section, Keplerlaan 1, 2201 AZ Noordwijk, Netherlands (3) Universität Stuttgart, Institut für Raumfahrtsysteme, Pfaffenwaldring 29, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany ABSTRACT investigate the physical connection between the Sun and Earth. Flying in a tetrahedral formation, the four After an in-depth mission analysis review the European spacecraft collect detailed data on small-scale changes Space Agency’s (ESA) four Cluster II spacecraft in near-Earth space and the interaction between the performed manoeuvres during 2015 aimed at ensuring a charged particles of the solar wind and Earth's re-entry for all of them between 2024 and 2027. This atmosphere. In order to explore the magnetosphere was done to contain any debris from the re-entry event Cluster II spacecraft occupy HEOs with initial near- to southern latitudes and hence minimise the risk for polar with orbital period of 57 hours at a perigee altitude people on ground, which was enabled by the relative of 19 000 km and apogee altitude of 119 000 km. The stability of the orbit under third body perturbations. four spacecraft have a cylindrical shape completed by Small differences in the highly eccentric orbits of the four long flagpole antennas. The diameter of the four spacecraft will lead to various different spacecraft is 2.9 m with a height of 1.3 m.
  • The International Space Station and the Space Shuttle

    The International Space Station and the Space Shuttle

    Order Code RL33568 The International Space Station and the Space Shuttle Updated November 9, 2007 Carl E. Behrens Specialist in Energy Policy Resources, Science, and Industry Division The International Space Station and the Space Shuttle Summary The International Space Station (ISS) program began in 1993, with Russia joining the United States, Europe, Japan, and Canada. Crews have occupied ISS on a 4-6 month rotating basis since November 2000. The U.S. Space Shuttle, which first flew in April 1981, has been the major vehicle taking crews and cargo back and forth to ISS, but the shuttle system has encountered difficulties since the Columbia disaster in 2003. Russian Soyuz spacecraft are also used to take crews to and from ISS, and Russian Progress spacecraft deliver cargo, but cannot return anything to Earth, since they are not designed to survive reentry into the Earth’s atmosphere. A Soyuz is always attached to the station as a lifeboat in case of an emergency. President Bush, prompted in part by the Columbia tragedy, made a major space policy address on January 14, 2004, directing NASA to focus its activities on returning humans to the Moon and someday sending them to Mars. Included in this “Vision for Space Exploration” is a plan to retire the space shuttle in 2010. The President said the United States would fulfill its commitments to its space station partners, but the details of how to accomplish that without the shuttle were not announced. The shuttle Discovery was launched on July 4, 2006, and returned safely to Earth on July 17.
  • The Advanced Cryogenic Evolved Stage (ACES)- a Low-Cost, Low-Risk Approach to Space Exploration Launch

    The Advanced Cryogenic Evolved Stage (ACES)- a Low-Cost, Low-Risk Approach to Space Exploration Launch

    The Advanced Cryogenic Evolved Stage (ACES)- A Low-Cost, Low-Risk Approach to Space Exploration Launch J. F. LeBar1 and E. C. Cady2 Boeing Phantom Works, Huntington Beach CA 92647 Space exploration top-level objectives have been defined with the United States first returning to the moon as a precursor to missions to Mars and beyond. System architecture studies are being conducted to develop the overall approach and define requirements for the various system elements, both Earth-to-orbit and in-space. One way of minimizing cost and risk is through the use of proven systems and/or multiple-use elements. Use of a Delta IV second stage derivative as a long duration in-space transportation stage offers cost, reliability, and performance advantages over earth-storable propellants and/or all new stages. The Delta IV second stage mission currently is measured in hours, and the various vehicle and propellant systems have been designed for these durations. In order for the ACES to have sufficient life to be useful as an Earth Departure Stage (EDS), many systems must be modified for long duration missions. One of the highest risk subsystems is the propellant storage Thermal Control System (TCS). The ACES effort concentrated on a lower risk passive TCS, the RL10 engine, and the other subsystems. An active TCS incorporating a cryocoolers was also studied. In addition, a number of computational models were developed to aid in the subsystem studies. The high performance TCS developed under ACES was simulated within the Delta IV thermal model and long-duration mission stage performance assessed.
  • Post Increment Evaluation Report Increment 11 International Space

    Post Increment Evaluation Report Increment 11 International Space

    SSP 54311 Baseline WWW.NASAWATCH.COM Post Increment Evaluation Report Increment 11 International Space Station Program Baseline June 2006 National Aeronautics and Space Administration International Space Station Program Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas Contract Number: NNJ04AA02C WWW.NASAWATCH.COM SSP 54311 Baseline - WWW.NASAWATCH.COM REVISION AND HISTORY PAGE REV. DESCRIPTION PUB. DATE - Initial Release (Reference per SSCD XXXXXX, EFF. XX-XX-XX) XX-XX-XX WWW.NASAWATCH.COM SSP 54311 Baseline - WWW.NASAWATCH.COM INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION PROGRAM POST INCREMENT EVALUATION REPORT INCREMENT 11 CHANGE SHEET Month XX, XXXX Baseline Space Station Control Board Directive XXXXXX/(X-X), dated XX-XX-XX. (X) CHANGE INSTRUCTIONS SSP 54311, Post Increment Evaluation Report Increment 11, has been baselined by the authority of SSCD XXXXXX. All future updates to this document will be identified on this change sheet. WWW.NASAWATCH.COM SSP 54311 Baseline - WWW.NASAWATCH.COM INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION PROGRAM POST INCREMENT EVALUATION REPORT INCREMENT 11 Baseline (Reference SSCD XXXXXX, dated XX-XX-XX) LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES Month XX, XXXX The current status of all pages in this document is as shown below: Page Change No. SSCD No. Date i - ix Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX 1-1 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX 2-1 - 2-2 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX 3-1 - 3-3 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX 4-1 - 4-15 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX 5-1 - 5-10 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX 6-1 - 6-4 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX 7-1 - 7-61 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX A-1 - A-9 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX B-1 - B-3 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX C-1 - C-2 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX D-1 - D-92 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX WWW.NASAWATCH.COM SSP 54311 Baseline - WWW.NASAWATCH.COM INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION PROGRAM POST INCREMENT EVALUATION REPORT INCREMENT 11 JUNE 2006 i SSP 54311 Baseline - WWW.NASAWATCH.COM SSCB APPROVAL NOTICE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION PROGRAM POST INCREMENT EVALUATION REPORT INCREMENT 11 JUNE 2006 Michael T.
  • The New Vision for Space Exploration

    The New Vision for Space Exploration

    Constellation The New Vision for Space Exploration Dale Thomas NASA Constellation Program October 2008 The Constellation Program was born from the Constellation’sNASA Authorization Beginnings Act of 2005 which stated…. The Administrator shall establish a program to develop a sustained human presence on the moon, including a robust precursor program to promote exploration, science, commerce and U.S. preeminence in space, and as a stepping stone to future exploration of Mars and other destinations. CONSTELLATION PROJECTS Initial Capability Lunar Capability Orion Altair Ares I Ares V Mission Operations EVA Ground Operations Lunar Surface EVA EXPLORATION ROADMAP 0506 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 LunarLunar OutpostOutpost BuildupBuildup ExplorationExploration andand ScienceScience LunarLunar RoboticsRobotics MissionsMissions CommercialCommercial OrbitalOrbital Transportation ServicesServices forfor ISSISS AresAres II andand OrionOrion DevelopmentDevelopment AltairAltair Lunar LanderLander Development AresAres VV and EarthEarth DepartureDeparture Stage SurfaceSurface SystemsSystems DevelopmentDevelopment ORION: NEXT GENERATION PILOTED SPACECRAFT Human access to Low Earth Orbit … … to the Moon and Mars ORION PROJECT: CREW EXPLORATION VEHICLE Orion will support both space station and moon missions Launch Abort System Orion will support both space stationDesigned and moonto operate missions for up to 210 days in Earth or lunar Designedorbit to operate for up to 210 days in Earth or lunar orbit Designed for lunar
  • Sustainable Operation of the ISS - Joint Session of the Human Space Endeavours and Space Operations Symposia (4-B6.5)

    Sustainable Operation of the ISS - Joint Session of the Human Space Endeavours and Space Operations Symposia (4-B6.5)

    Paper ID: 14810 63rd International Astronautical Congress 2012 oral HUMAN SPACE ENDEAVOURS SYMPOSIUM (B3) Sustainable Operation of the ISS - Joint Session of the Human Space Endeavours and Space Operations Symposia (4-B6.5) Author: Mrs. Rosa Sapone Altec S.p.A., Italy, [email protected] Dr. Elena Afelli Altec S.p.A., Italy, [email protected] Dr. Paolo Cergna Altec S.p.A., Italy, [email protected] Dr. Francesco Santoro Altec S.p.A., Italy, [email protected] Mrs. Silvana Rabbia Italian Space Agency (ASI), Italy, [email protected] Dr. Marino Crisconio Italian Space Agency (ASI), Italy, [email protected] LOGISTICS & MAINTENANCE SUPPORT FOR MPLM MODULES IN THE FRAME OF ISS OPERATION - OVERVIEW AND LESSONS LEARNED Abstract The MPLM's are the three pressurized logistic modules built by the Italian Space Agency (ASI) to travel on the NASA Space Shuttle between Earth and the International Space Station, transporting experiments, supplies and materials for the astronauts' life and the scientific activities and returning cargo to Earth. The MPLM's were designed to support 25 missions each, in two different configurations, active (for freezer-racks) and passive, depending on the environmental requirements of the cargo to be uploaded. Once attached to the ISS, the MPLM provided habitable space for two astronauts as well as active andpassive storage. In view of their typical mission timeline and scenario, the MPLM maintenance activities were performed on ground, in the frame of a quite complex series of turn-around activities between consecutive missions. As far as MPLM is concerned, the concept of ORU (orbital replaceable unit) was replaced by the concept of LRU (line replaceable unit).