DOCSLIB.ORG

NAP.OC4 Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NAP.OC4 Final Report - ---- --------------- --------- Index Preface o. Executive summary 2 1. Introduction 3 1.1 Rationale for study 3 1.2 General approach 5 2. Identification of research priorities 7 2.1 Inventory, documentation and analysis of current projects 7 2.2 Identification and prioritisation of research issues 16 2.3 Recommendations 18 3. Evaluation of resource information and other data sources 20 3.1 Overview and assessment of existing resource information 20 3.2 Conclusions 23 4. Assessment of producer awareness and prospects for technology transfer 24 4.1 Communication of natural resource issues 24 4.2 Assessing producer awareness and potential for adoption 27 4.3 Conclusions 28 5. Conceptual framework for multi-disciplinary research into catchment 29 management, water quality and nutrient flows as they relate to the northern beef industry 5.1 General framework 29 5.2 Critical research components 31 5.3 Critical communication components 33 5.4 Project management structure 35 5.5 Estimation of costs and time-frames and identification of linkages 36 5.6 Recommendations 42 6. Selection of potential focus catchments 44 6.1 General procedure 44 6.2 Assessment of intrinsic vulnerability 44 6.3 Relevance of catchments to beef industry 52 6.4 Evaluation of short-listed catchments 65 6.4.1 Burdekin 66 6.4.2 Burnett 74 ; 6.4.3 Fitzroy (QLD) 80 6.4.4 Ord 87 6.4.5 Victoria 93 6.5 Ranking of short-listed catchments and recommendations 99 7. References 101 8. Appendices 106 8.1 Terms of Reference 107 8.2 Members of core team and reference group 109 8.3 Workshop reports 110 8.4 Research proforrnas 112 8.5 Result documentation of the assessment of intrinsic vulnerability 178 Roth et aI. 1999 Scoping Study - Catchments for NAP3 funded research Acknowledgements The authors of this study are greatly indebted to numerous staff in federal and state agencies that provided us with the bulk of the infonnation collated in this report. The assistance they provided was given generously and willingly and without their help, this study would not have been possible in the timeframe given. To all we express our sincere thanks. We are also grateful for the feedback and written comments provided on the draft report by many of the people contacted during various phase of this study. Our special thanks goes to Barry Walker and Judy Lambert of the NAP3 team for their ongoing and very constructive support. It was a great pleasure to work with them, and Barry Walker provided us with many useful comments following an extensive review of the draft report that helped us improve the final version of this study. Likewise, we are grateful for Mick Fleming's review of and input to the final report. Christian Roth CSIRO Land and Water, Townsville Roth et a1. 1999 Seoping Study - Catchments for NAP3 funded research Index Preface o. Executive summary 2 1. Introduction 3 1.1 Rationale for study 3 1.2 General approach 5 2. Identification of research priorities 7 2.1 Inventory, documentation and analysis of current projects 7 2.2 Identification and prioritisation of research issues 16 2.3 Recommendations 18 3. Evaluation of resource information and other data sources 20 3.1 Overview and assessment of existing resource information 20 3.2 Conclusions 23 4. Assessment of producer awareness and prospects for technology transfer 24 4.1 Communication of natural resource issues 24 4.2 Assessing producer awareness and potential for adoption 27 4.3 Conclusions 28 5. Conceptual framework for multi-disciplinary research into catchment 29 management, water quality and nutrient flows as they relate to the northern beef industry 5.1 General framework 29 5.2 Critical research components 31 5.3 Critical communication components 33 5.4 Project management structure 35 5.5 Estimation of costs and time-frames and identification of linkages 36 5.6 Recommendations 42 6. Selection of potential focus catchments 44 6.1 General procedure 44 6.2 Assessment of intrinsic vulnerability 44 6.3 Relevance of catchments to beef industry 52 6.4 Evaluation of short-listed catchments 65 6.4.1 Burdekin 66 6.4.2 Burnett 74 6.4.3 Fitzroy (QLD) 80 6.4.4 Ord 87 6.4.5 \7ictoria 93 6.5 Ranking of short-listed catchments and recommendations 99 7. References 101 8. Appendices 106 8.1 Terms of Reference 107 8.2 Members of core team and reference group 109 8.3 Workshop reports 110 8.4 Research proforrnas 112 8.5 Result documentation of the assessment of intrinsic vulnerability 178 Roth et al. 1999 Scoping Study - Catchments for NAP3 funded research ~I - 1 - Preface Meat and Livestock Australia acknowledges the excellent work of Christian Roth and his colleagues who conducted this scoping study. Using a previous literature review completed for the Meat Research Corporation (MRC) and the Land & Water Resources R&D Corporation (LWRRDC) as a starting point, Christian and his collaborating authors from agencies across northern Australia have brought together a rich diversity of literature, technical and industry expertise to provide recommendations for future work on catchment management, water quality and nutrient flows in the northern grazing lands. The report provides a substantial basis for commissioning a multi-disciplinary study to quantify catchment-scale grazing impacts on sediment and nutrient exports in northern Australia. This initial scoping work was commissioned in December 1997 and this report was submitted to the MRC in April 1998. It was jointly funded by the then Meat Research Corporation and the Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation, under Phase 3 of the MRC's North Australia Program. Meat and Livestock Australia and the authors thank all those, both individuals and organisations, who generously contributed their time and information to this review. Judy Lambert Natural Resource Management Consultant MRC North Australia Program October 1998 Roth et al 1999 Scoping Study - Catchments for NAP3 funded research .~~--~- -2- O. Executive summary Following a review of current information on the effects of grazing management in grazed lands of Northern Australia on water and nutrient cycles and the downstream fluxes of water, sediment and nutrients (Hook, 1997), NAP3 commissioned the present scoping study to: • collate and review existing information on research projects studying water quality and nutrient flow issues as related to grazing management in Northern Australia and identify priority issues in need of new or further research within the context of the recommendations provided by Hook's review; • assess the relative potential vulnerability of grazed catchments across Northern Australia and evaluate perceived risks to water quality and nutrient flows as related to soil types, current stocking pressures/grazing management practices and other land uses; • provide NAP3 with recommendations on potential focus catchments for research into grazing effects on catchment response and optimum implementation through a major multi­ agency research group. On the basis of the review of ongoing research and monitoring and in view of the current work on off-site impacts and the limitations on funding, we recommend that future work on catchment management, water quality and nutrient flows as related to the northern beef industry be primarily focussed on: • impacts of grazing management on sediment generation and nutrient loss at scales ranging from hillslope to catchment, • quantification of key determinants of sediment,nutrient and overland flow processes at paddock, catchment and landform scales and their modeling to enable extrapolation to other catchments in Northem Australia. Considering the complexity, longevity and costs associated with the establishment of a major project to conduct research into grazing management impacts on sediment and nutrient export, we recommend that: • the project be focussed around critical research components addressing the above two sets of priority issues • the research components be complemented by an effective communication strategy • that the research components be designed so as to maximise links to existing research, particularly in the fields of off-site impacts and research into the socio-economic determinants of grazing management, • the project be managed through a steering committee in liaison with a project coordinator responsible for research and communication coordination, • the overall project be spread beyond the time frame of NAP3 and future funding sought. Utilising a GIS analysis to assess intrinsic vulnerability and relevance of the catchments to the beef industry for all 132 catchments in NA, five potential catchments were shortlisted (Burdekin, Burnett, Fitzroy, Ord, Victoria). Following an expert ranking against a set of predetermined criteria, we make the following recommendations: • to select either the Burdekin or the Fitzroy catchment as the focus catchment for future research ofgrazing impacts on sediment and nutrient loss • to select the Victoria catchment as a future case study catchment to apply and test the extrapolation of tools developed in the focus catchment study and to assess their utility for other grazed catchments in NA. Roth et aI. 1999 Seoping Study - Catchments for NAP3 funded research - 3- 1. Introduction 1.1 Rationale for study Extended dry seasons in recent years combined with changed cattle production systems have placed increased pressure on native pastures across Northern Australia (NA). The resultant increase in grazing pressure has coincided with a growing awareness that activities in one part of a catchment not only affect land condition and processes where they occur, but that the changed processes on land can also lead to changes in waterways and downstream waterbodies. There is growing concern that high grazing pressures and inappropriate management of grazing land have resulted in increased flows of sediment and nutrient through and oilt of grazed catchments. Apart from the detrimental effects of nutrient and water loss on pasture productivity, there is particular concern that the off-site effects may impart negative impacts on water quality in rivers, health of in-stream ecosystems, on productivity of estuarine breeding grounds of commercial fisheries and on the ecology of off­ shore reefs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CSIRO OCEANS and ATMOSPHERE Richard Pillans March 2016
    CSIRO OCEANS AND ATMOSPHERE 12 Monthly progress report: Sawfish and Glyphis Research Program Richard Pillans March 2016 Client Name: Western Australia Department of Regional Development and Lands (ABN ) 28 807 221 246 Contact person: Eugene Carew CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere Citation Pillans, RD (2016). 12 month progress report: Sawfish and Glyphis Research Program CSIRO, Australia. Copyright and disclaimer © 2016 CSIRO To the extent permitted by law, all rights are reserved and no part of this publication covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means except with the written permission of CSIRO. Important disclaimer CSIRO advises that the information contained in this publication comprises general statements based on scientific research. The reader is advised and needs to be aware that such information may be incomplete or unable to be used in any specific situation. No reliance or actions must therefore be made on that information without seeking prior expert professional, scientific and technical advice. To the extent permitted by law, CSIRO (including its employees and consultants) excludes all liability to any person for any consequences, including but not limited to all losses, damages, costs, expenses and any other compensation, arising directly or indirectly from using this publication (in part or in whole) and any information or material contained in it. Contents Executive summary .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Resources of Cape York Peninsula
    CAPE YORK PENINSULA LAND USE STRATEGY LAND USE PROGRAM SURFACE WATER RESOURCES OF CAPE YORK PENINSULA A.M. Horn Queensland Department of Primary Industries 1995 r .am1, a DEPARTMENT OF, PRIMARY 1NDUSTRIES CYPLUS is a joint initiative of the Queensland and Commonwealth Governments CAPE YORK PENINSULA LAND USE STRATEGY (CYPLUS) Land Use Program SURFACE WATER RESOURCES OF CAPE YORK PENINSULA A.M.Horn Queensland Department of Primary Industries CYPLUS is a joint initiative of the Queensland and Commonwealth Governments Recommended citation: Horn. A. M (1995). 'Surface Water Resources of Cape York Peninsula'. (Cape York Peninsula Land Use Strategy, Office of the Co-ordinator General of Queensland, Brisbane, Department of the Environment, Sport and Territories, Canberra and Queensland Department of Primary Industries.) Note: Due to the timing of publication, reports on other CYPLUS projects may not be fully cited in the BIBLIOGRAPHY section. However, they should be able to be located by author, agency or subject. ISBN 0 7242 623 1 8 @ The State of Queensland and Commonwealth of Australia 1995. Copyright protects this publication. Except for purposes permitted by the Copyright Act 1968, - no part may be reproduced by any means without the prior written permission of the Office of the Co-ordinator General of Queensland and the Australian Government Publishing Service. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: Office of the Co-ordinator General, Government of Queensland PO Box 185 BRISBANE ALBERT STREET Q 4002 The Manager, Commonwealth Information Services GPO Box 84 CANBERRA ACT 2601 CAPE YORK PENINSULA LAND USE STRATEGY STAGE I PREFACE TO PROJECT REPORTS Cape York Peninsula Land Use Strategy (CYPLUS) is an initiative to provide a basis for public participation in planning for the ecologically sustainable development of Cape York Peninsula.
    [Show full text]
  • Demographic Trends and Likely Futures for Australia's Tropical Rivers
    Demographic Trends and Likely Futures for Australia’s Tropical Rivers Prepared by Dean Carson, Andrew Taylor and Suzanne Campbell School for Social and Policy Research, Charles Darwin University October 2009 Disclaimer TRaCK has published the information contained in this publication to assist public knowledge and discussion and to help improve the sustainable management of Australia’s tropical rivers and coasts. Where technical information has been prepared by or contributed by authors external to TRaCK, readers should contact the author(s), and conduct their own enquiries, before making use of that information. No person should act on the contents of this publication whether as to matters of fact or opinion or other content, without first obtaining specific independent professional advice which confirms the information contained within this publication. While all reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the information in this publication is correct, matters covered by the publication are subject to change. Charles Darwin University does not assume and hereby disclaims any express or implied liability whatsoever to any party for any loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether these errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or any other cause. Copyright This publication is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced, by any process, without written permission from the publisher, Enquiries
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Locating Seven Rivers
    7. Locating Seven Rivers Fiona Powell 1. Introduction In December 1890, while on patrol down the west coast of northern Cape York Peninsula (NCYP), accompanied by Senior-Constable Conroy and a few native troopers of the Thursday Island Water Police, Sub-Inspector Charles Savage visited ‘the Seven Rivers’.1 From this place, the party went south to the mouth of the Batavia (now Wenlock) River. There they met the chief or mamoose of the Seven Rivers tribe,2 a man identified as Tongambulo (variations Tong-ham-blow,3 Tongamblow4 and Tong-am-bulo5) and also known as Charlie in one account.6 At the time of this meeting, Sub-Inspector Savage was seeking another candidate for induction into government policies intended ‘to civilize the Natives of Cape York Peninsula’.7 The first NCYP Aboriginal person to have had this experience was Harry, also known as King Yarra-ham-quee, and described as the ‘mamoose of the Jardine River’.8 This man had been taken to Thursday Island earlier in the year: where he underwent a course of instruction and when he had sufficiently understood what was required of him was taken back and made king, his subjects and several visitors, Natives of Prince of Wales Island, being present.9 1 ‘Conciliating the Natives’, Torres Straits Pilot, 6 December 1890, and published in The Queenslander, Saturday 27 December 1890: 1216 [hereafter ‘Conciliating the Natives’ Torres Straits Pilot]. 2 Savage, Charles 1891, Letter to the Honourable John Douglas, Government Resident Thursday Island, dated 11 February 1891, Queensland State Archives, Item D 143032, File - Reserve.
    [Show full text]
  • IR 519 Preliminary Analysis of Streamflow Characteristics of The
    internal report 519 Preliminary analysis of streamflow characteristics of the tropical rivers region DR Moliere February 2007 (Release status - unrestricted) Preliminary analysis of streamflow characteristics of the tropical rivers region DR Moliere Hydrological and Geomorphic Processes Program Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist Supervising Scientist Division GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801 February 2007 Registry File SG2006/0061 (Release status – unrestricted) How to cite this report: Moliere DR 2007. Preliminary analysis of streamflow characteristics of the tropical rivers region. Internal Report 519, February, Supervising Scientist, Darwin. Unpublished paper. Location of final PDF file in SSD Explorer \Publications Work\Publications and other productions\Internal Reports (IRs)\Nos 500 to 599\IR519_TRR Hydrology (Moliere)\IR519_TRR hydrology (Moliere).pdf Contents Executive summary v Acknowledgements v Glossary vi 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Climate 2 2 Hydrology 5 2.1 Annual flow 5 2.2 Monthly flow 7 2.3 Focus catchments 11 2.3.1 Data 11 2.3.2 Data quality 18 3 Streamflow classification 19 3.1 Derivation of variables 19 3.2 Multivariate analysis 24 3.2.1 Effect of flow data quality on hydrology variables 31 3.3 Validation 33 4 Conclusions and recommendations 35 5 References 35 Appendix A – Rainfall and flow gauging stations within the focus catchments 38 Appendix B – Long-term flow stations throughout the tropical rivers region 43 Appendix C – Extension of flow record at G8140040 48 Appendix D – Annual runoff volume and annual peak discharge 52 Appendix E – Derivation of Colwell parameter values 81 iii iv Executive summary The Tropical Rivers Inventory and Assessment Project is aiming to categorise the ecological character of rivers throughout Australia’s wet-dry tropical rivers region.
    [Show full text]
  • Cape York Claims and Determinations
    142°E 143°E 144°E 145°E Keirri Island Maururra Island ROUND ISLAND THURSDAY ISLAND CONSERVATION PARK ! ! Kaurareg MURALUG Aboriginal Muri Aboriginal Kaiwalagal AC Horn Land Trust Cape Land Trust Hammond Island York Mori CAPE YORK CLAIMS AND DETERMINATIONS Island POSSESSION Island CAPE YORK PENINSULA LAND TENURE EDITION 35 ISLAND Prepared by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines Townsville, Queensland, 6 June 2017 NATIONAL Ulrica Point PARK " Major Road Cape Cornwall Chandogoo Point Legend Homesteads/Roadhouse Minor Road Cliffy Point !( Population Centres SEISIA! River Boundary of CYP Region as referred !NEW MAPOON to in the CYP Heritage Act 2007 UMAGICO! ! Reef ! BAMAGA INJINOO Turtle Head Island DUNBAR Pastoral Holding Name Nature Refuge & Conservation Areas Slade Point Sharp Point Cape York Claims Cape York Determinations y Ck ck Sadd Point 11°S Ja 11°S y Classes of Land Tenure Apudthama k c Furze Point a Land Trust J JARDINE LandN ATIONALreserved- PARK Under ConservationNathe ture FREEHOLDINGincludingLEASE PURCHASELEASE SPECIAL RIVER Naaas tionaNaAct Park, Conserva l tionaor Park(Scientific) l tion theirforTena pay pricepurchaFREEHOLD these to - elects nt Jardine River RESOURCES Park. leawhichfreeho se, toconverts ldoncom pletionofpayments. RESERVE DENHAM GROUP Ussher NATIONAL PARK creaover tedAbo - N rigina ATIONAL(CYPAL) PARKland. l Land admLANDS- LEASE inisteredexcludingunderLand the Act JARDINE RIVER Point Traditionaformaareowners l (represented llybylanda trust) MiningHom esteaTenem d Lea ent ses. Vrilya Point NATIONAL PARK recognisedownersas ofland,thearea the being ma na gedaas NunderConservaNathe ain perpetuity tiona ture (CYPAL) Park tion l PERPETUincludingLEASES AL GRAZINGHOMESTEAD Act. PERPETUNON-COMPETITIVE LEASE, AL LEASE, Orford Ness N ON-COMPETITIVECONVLEASE Ongo ERTED - inglea seho ld CONSERVATIONRESOU PARK, Land RCESRESERVE Reserved- oragricultural e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Extract from the National Native Title Register
    Extract from the National Native Title Register Determination Information: Determination Reference: Federal Court Number(s): QUD156/2011 NNTT Number: QCD2014/011 Determination Name: Coconut on behalf of the Northern Cape York #2 Native Title Claim Group v State of Queensland Date(s) of Effect: 27/10/2014 Determination Outcome: Native title exists in the entire determination area Register Extract (pursuant to s. 193 of the Native Title Act 1993) Determination Date: 20/06/2014 Determining Body: Federal Court of Australia ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: This determination was handed down by the Federal Court on 20 June 2014 and was conditional on the registration of three Indigenous Land Use Agreements (ILUAs): QI2014/038 - Mapoon Aboriginal Shire Council Northern Cape York Group #2 ILUA; QI2014/037 - Northern Cape York Group #2 Napranum Aboriginal Shire Council ILUA; and QI2014/036 Northern Cape York Group #2 and Ergon Energy ILUA. All of the ILUAs were registered on 27 October 2014. The conditions attached to the determination have therefore now been met. REGISTERED NATIVE TITLE BODY CORPORATE: Mokwiri Aboriginal Corporation RNTBC Trustee Body Corporate c/- Weipa Post Ofiice Weipa Queensland 4874 Note: current contact details for the Registered Native Title Body Corporate are available from the Office of the Registrar of Indigenous Corporations www.oric.gov.au COMMON LAW HOLDER(S) OF NATIVE TITLE: 6. The native title is held by the Northern Cape York #2 Native Title Claim Group, being the persons descended from the apical ancestors described in
    [Show full text]
  • B "I-^. This Paper Discusses the Early ; *V* Twentieth-Century Export Industry Based
    Wharton •••• The sandalwood industry or) Cape York Peninsula The sandalwood industry on Cape York Peninsula from the 1890s to the 1920s Geoff Wharton Sandalwood is the common name for trees of the genus Santalum in the botanical family Santalaceae.* There are six species found in Australia, including Santalum acuminatum, S. album, S. murrayanum, S. obtusifolium, S. spicatum and the subject of this paper - the most 5¥^, * M widespread in Australia - Santalum t' ?' »•% lanceolatum. All of these species are fl p"^ hemiparasitic, meaning that they take M. t some of their nutrients and water from the roots of host plants.^ The generic name Santalum is derived from the Greek santalon, which in turn was derived from the Sanskrit chandana, meaning 'fragrant'.^ The specific epithet lanceolatum refers to the leaves being i ^ t about four times as long as they are 11 ' broad, being 'broadest in the lower half and tapering towards the tip'."* ,b "i-^. This paper discusses the early ; *v* twentieth-century export industry based •/i on Northern Sandalwood {Santalum • •/ ' 'I^V lanceolatum), a shrub or small tree that Mature Santalum lanceolatum on Sudley station, grows on Cape York Peninsula in north about 40 kilometres inland (east) of Welpa, 25 June 2005. This tree had a girth of about 660 mm Queensland and in a wide range of at the base and was about 7 metres high. (Photo by author) areas across the Australian continent.^ * HJ Hewson and AS George, 'Santalaceae', In Alexander S George, ed.. Flora of Australia: Volume 22 Rhizophorales to Celastrales, Canberra, AGPS, 1984, p. 29 and p.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Watch Areas Arnhem Coastal Rivers Northern Territory River Basin No
    Flood Watch Areas Arnhem Coastal Rivers Northern Territory River Basin No. Blyth River 15 Buckingham River 17 East Alligator River 12 Goomadeer River 13 A r a f u r a S e a Goyder River 16 North West Coastal Rivers Liverpool River 14 T i m o r S e a River Basin No. Adelaide River 4 below Adelaide River Town Arnhem Croker Coastal Daly River above Douglas River 10 Melville Island Rivers Finniss River 2 Island Marchinbar Katherine River 11 Milikapiti ! Island Lower Daly River 9 1 Elcho ! Carpentaria Coastal Rivers Mary River 5 1 Island Bathurst Nguiu Maningrida Galiwinku River Basin No. Island 12 ! ! Moyle River 8 ! Nhulunbuy 13 Milingimbi ! Yirrkala ! Calvert River 31 South Alligator River 7 DARWIN ! ! Howard " Oenpelli Ramingining Groote Eylandt 23 Tiwi Islands 1 2 Island 17 North West 6 ! 14 Koolatong River 21 Jabiru Upper Adelaide River 3 Coastal 15 Batchelor 4 Limmen Bight River 27 Wildman River 6 Rivers ! 16 7 21 McArthur River 29 3 5 ! Bickerton Robinson River 30 Island Daly River ! Groote Roper River 25 ! ! Bonaparte Coastal Rivers Bonaparte 22 Alyangula Eylandt Rosie River 28 Pine 11 ! 9 Creek Angurugu River Basin No. Coastal 8 Towns River 26 ! ! Kalumburu Rivers Numbulwar Fitzmaurice River 18 ! Walker River 22 Katherine 25 Upper Victoria River 20 24 Ngukurr 23 Waterhouse River 24 18 ! Victoria River below Kalkarindji 19 10 Carpentaria G u l f 26 Coastal Rivers ! o f ! Wyndham Vanderlin C a r p e n t a r i a ! 28 Kununurra West Island Island 27 ! Borroloola 41 Mount 19 Barnett Mornington ! ! Dunmarra Island Warmun 30 (Turkey 32 Creek) ! 29 Bentinck 39 Island Kalkarindji 31 ! Elliott ! ! Karumba ! 20 ! Normanton Doomadgee Burketown Fitzroy ! Crossing Renner ! Halls Creek ! Springs ! ! Lajamanu 41 Larrawa ! Warrego Barkly ! 40 33 Homestead QLD ! Roadhouse Tennant ! Balgo Creek WA ! Hill Camooweal ! 34 Mount Isa Cloncurry ! ! ! Flood Watch Area No.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Risk Management in Australia Building Flood Resilience in a Changing Climate
    Flood Risk Management in Australia Building flood resilience in a changing climate December 2020 Flood Risk Management in Australia Building flood resilience in a changing climate Neil Dufty, Molino Stewart Pty Ltd Andrew Dyer, IAG Maryam Golnaraghi (lead investigator of the flood risk management report series and coordinating author), The Geneva Association Flood Risk Management in Australia 1 The Geneva Association The Geneva Association was created in 1973 and is the only global association of insurance companies; our members are insurance and reinsurance Chief Executive Officers (CEOs). Based on rigorous research conducted in collaboration with our members, academic institutions and multilateral organisations, our mission is to identify and investigate key trends that are likely to shape or impact the insurance industry in the future, highlighting what is at stake for the industry; develop recommendations for the industry and for policymakers; provide a platform to our members, policymakers, academics, multilateral and non-governmental organisations to discuss these trends and recommendations; reach out to global opinion leaders and influential organisations to highlight the positive contributions of insurance to better understanding risks and to building resilient and prosperous economies and societies, and thus a more sustainable world. The Geneva Association—International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics Talstrasse 70, CH-8001 Zurich Email: [email protected] | Tel: +41 44 200 49 00 | Fax: +41 44 200 49 99 Photo credits: Cover page—Markus Gebauer / Shutterstock.com December 2020 Flood Risk Management in Australia © The Geneva Association Published by The Geneva Association—International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics, Zurich. 2 www.genevaassociation.org Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Sleeper Weeds in Australia
    Funded by Land and Water Australia, CSIRO and JCU i ii An Assessment of the Social and Economic Values of Australia’s Tropical Rivers Scoping report prepared for Land and Water Australia’s Tropical Rivers Program September 2006 Natalie Stoeckl#, Owen Stanley#, Sue Jackson*, Anna Straton* and Vicki Brown# Funded by Land and Water Australia, CSIRO and JCU # School of Business, James Cook University * CSIRO iii Acknowledgements Special thanks go to Romy Greiner and Dan Walker for their contributions in setting up the framework for this study. We would also like to thank the Northern Australia Irrigation Futures team (Patrick Hegarty, Bart Kellett, Cuan Petheram and Keith Bristow) for allowing us to use much of their work on the laws, programs and institutions affecting water use in the TR region. Many thanks also to Danielle Brooker, Melanie Giannikos and Karina Lynch for their research assistance, and to Alexander Herr and Wolfgang Stoeckl for their GIS contributions. We would also like to acknowledge the very special contribution made by the many people who assisted with the organisation and promotion of the community forums: Barbara McKaige (CSE), Emma Woodward (CSE), Patrick O’Leary (CSE), Anna Mardling and Charles Prouse (Kimberley Land Council), Madonna McKay (Katherine region NRM facilitator), Clare Taylor (Rivercare). Finally – and perhaps most importantly – we thank all of those who participated in community forums. iv Executive summary Background Covering an area of more than 1.3 million km2, the tropical rivers (TR) region includes 55 river basins and extends across all catchments from the west side of Cape York to the Kimberley, through Queensland, the Northern Territory and Western Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Network Review Final Report
    Surface Water Network Review Final Report 16 July 2018 This publication has been compiled by Operations Support - Water, Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy. © State of Queensland, 2018 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The Queensland Government shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. Interpreter statement: The Queensland Government is committed to providing accessible services to Queenslanders from all culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. If you have difficulty in understanding this document, you can contact us within Australia on 13QGOV (13 74 68) and we will arrange an interpreter to effectively communicate the report to you. Surface
    [Show full text]