DOCSLIB.ORG

Invasive Plant Control Project FSEIS, Carson and Santa Fe National

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Invasive Plant Control Project FSEIS, Carson and Santa Fe National United States Department of Agriculture Invasive Plant Control Project Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Forest Service Carson and Santa Fe National Forests May 2018 MB-R3-10-26 For More Information Contact: Sandra Imler-Jacquez, Forest NEPA Coordinator 11 Forest Lane, Santa Fe, NM 87508 (505) 438-5443 [email protected] In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: [email protected]. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. Note: We make every effort to create documents that are accessible to individuals of all abilities; however, limitations with our word processing programs may prevent some parts of this document from being readable by computer-assisted reading devices. If you need assistance with this document, please contact the Santa Fe National Forest at (505) 438- 5443. Cover photo: Bull thistle (Cirsium vulgare). Photo courtesy of Forest & Kim Starr, Starr Environmental, Bugwood.org Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Invasive Plant Control Project Carson and Santa Fe National Forests Colfax, Los Alamos, Mora, Rio Arriba, San Miguel, Santa Fe, Sandoval, and Taos Counties, New Mexico Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Responsible Officials: James Duran, Carson National Forest Supervisor 208 Cruz Alta Road, Taos, NM 87571 James E. Melonas, Santa Fe National Forest Supervisor 11 Forest Lane, Santa Fe, NM 87508 Abstract: This final supplemental environmental impact statement updates and corrects some analyses in the Forest Service’s Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Invasive Plant Control Project for the Carson and Santa Fe National Forests published in September 2005. It keeps the same purpose and need, proposed action, alternatives, adaptive strategy, and design features (also referred to as mitigation measures) as the final environmental impact statement. The following substantive updates are contained in this supplement: • The addition of aminopyralid as an herbicide proposed for use; • The acres and species of weeds in the forests; • The analysis of effects in chapter 3; and • The analysis of effects of the proposed amendment to the Santa Fe National Forest Plan. The pages in this supplement are intended to replace portions of the final environmental impact statement as noted in each section. If something is not addressed in this supplement, it means it was not updated. This final supplemental environmental impact statement and the draft record of decision are subject to objection pursuant to 36 CFR 218.8, Subparts A and B. For more information on how to comment/file objections see the project website at: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=27249 or contact Sandra Imler- Jacquez, project team leader, at 505-438-5443. Contents Summary of the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Invasive Plant Control Project .1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................................................1 Purpose and Need for Action ...........................................................................................................................1 Public Involvement and Issues ........................................................................................................................2 Proposed Action ..............................................................................................................................................4 Alternatives Considered in Detail ....................................................................................................................4 Forest Plan Amendment ..................................................................................................................................7 Environmental Consequences and Comparison of Alternatives ......................................................................8 Preface ...............................................................................................................................................................12 Notes on This Document ...............................................................................................................................12 Chapter 1. Purpose of and Need for Action .......................................................................................................13 Introduction and Setting ................................................................................................................................13 Definition of Invasive Plant ...........................................................................................................................13 Purpose and Need for Action .........................................................................................................................13 Background: Existing Condition ...................................................................................................................15 Management Direction – Desired Condition .................................................................................................21 Other Direction ..............................................................................................................................................21 Proposed Action ............................................................................................................................................22 Decision-making Framework ........................................................................................................................24 Public Involvement ........................................................................................................................................24 Issues .............................................................................................................................................................26 Chapter 2. Alternatives, Including the Proposed Action....................................................................................27 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................27 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Study ......................................................................27 Alternatives Considered in Detail ..................................................................................................................27 Forest Plan Amendment ................................................................................................................................38 Permits and Authorizations Required ............................................................................................................39 Comparison of Alternatives ...........................................................................................................................40 Chapter 3. Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences ..............................................................43 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................43 Cumulative Actions for Cumulative Effects Analysis ...................................................................................43 Assumptions Common to the Analysis of Effects .........................................................................................51 Vegetation ......................................................................................................................................................52 Wildlife Resource ..........................................................................................................................................66
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vascular Plants and a Brief History of the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands
    United States Department of Agriculture Vascular Plants and a Brief Forest Service Rocky Mountain History of the Kiowa and Rita Research Station General Technical Report Blanca National Grasslands RMRS-GTR-233 December 2009 Donald L. Hazlett, Michael H. Schiebout, and Paulette L. Ford Hazlett, Donald L.; Schiebout, Michael H.; and Ford, Paulette L. 2009. Vascular plants and a brief history of the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS- GTR-233. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 44 p. Abstract Administered by the USDA Forest Service, the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands occupy 230,000 acres of public land extending from northeastern New Mexico into the panhandles of Oklahoma and Texas. A mosaic of topographic features including canyons, plateaus, rolling grasslands and outcrops supports a diverse flora. Eight hundred twenty six (826) species of vascular plant species representing 81 plant families are known to occur on or near these public lands. This report includes a history of the area; ethnobotanical information; an introductory overview of the area including its climate, geology, vegetation, habitats, fauna, and ecological history; and a plant survey and information about the rare, poisonous, and exotic species from the area. A vascular plant checklist of 816 vascular plant taxa in the appendix includes scientific and common names, habitat types, and general distribution data for each species. This list is based on extensive plant collections and available herbarium collections. Authors Donald L. Hazlett is an ethnobotanist, Director of New World Plants and People consulting, and a research associate at the Denver Botanic Gardens, Denver, CO.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora, Bryce
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Bryce Canyon National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR–2009/153 ON THE COVER Matted prickly-phlox (Leptodactylon caespitosum), Bryce Canyon National Park, Utah. Photograph by Walter Fertig. Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Bryce Canyon National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR–2009/153 Author Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting 1117 W. Grand Canyon Dr. Kanab, UT 84741 Sarah Topp Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 Editing and Design Alice Wondrak Biel Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 January 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientifi c community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifi cally credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resource Technical Report series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientifi c studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission. The reports provide contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Diversification of the Gall Midge Genus Asteromyia
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 54 (2010) 194–210 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Evolutionary diversification of the gall midge genus Asteromyia (Cecidomyiidae) in a multitrophic ecological context John O. Stireman III a,*, Hilary Devlin a, Timothy G. Carr b, Patrick Abbot c a Department of Biological Sciences, Wright State University, 3640 Colonel Glenn Hwy., Dayton, OH 45435, USA b Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, E145 Corson Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA c Department of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Box 351634 Station B, Nashville, TN 37235, USA article info abstract Article history: Gall-forming insects provide ideal systems to analyze the evolution of host–parasite interactions and Received 3 April 2009 understand the ecological interactions that contribute to evolutionary diversification. Flies in the family Revised 17 August 2009 Cecidomyiidae represent the largest radiation of gall-forming insects and are characterized by complex Accepted 9 September 2009 trophic interactions with plants, fungal symbionts, and predators. We analyzed the phylogenetic history Available online 16 September 2009 and evolutionary associations of the North American cecidomyiid genus Asteromyia, which is engaged in a complex and perhaps co-evolving community of interactions with host-plants, fungi, and parasitoids. Keywords: Mitochondrial gene trees generally support current classifications, but reveal extensive cryptic diversity Adaptive diversification within the eight named species. Asteromyia likely radiated after their associated host-plants in the Aste- Fungal mutualism Insect-plant coevolution reae, but species groups exhibit strong associations with specific lineages of Astereae. Evolutionary asso- Cryptic species ciations with fungal mutualists are dynamic, however, and suggest rapid and perhaps coordinated Parasitoid changes across trophic levels.
    [Show full text]
  • A Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks Appendix 14 – Plants of Conservation Concern
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science A Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks Appendix 14 – Plants of Conservation Concern Natural Resource Report NPS/SEKI/ NRR—2013/665.14 In Memory of Rebecca Ciresa Wenk, Botaness ON THE COVER Giant Forest, Sequoia National Park Photography by: Brent Paull A Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks Appendix 14 – Plants of Conservation Concern Natural Resource Report NPS/SEKI/ NRR—2013/665.14 Ann Huber University of California Berkeley 41043 Grouse Drive Three Rivers, CA 93271 Adrian Das U.S. Geological Survey Western Ecological Research Center, Sequoia-Kings Canyon Field Station 47050 Generals Highway #4 Three Rivers, CA 93271 Rebecca Wenk University of California Berkeley 137 Mulford Hall Berkeley, CA 94720-3114 Sylvia Haultain Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks 47050 Generals Highway Three Rivers, CA 93271 June 2013 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 – Affected Environment
    Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan October 2016 Final Environmental Impact Statement 3 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT Chapter 3 describes the environmental resources (physical, biological, cultural, recreational, and socioeconomic) that could be affected by the range of alternatives for implementing the Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan (LTEMP), as described in Chapters 1 and 2. The extent to which each specific resource may be affected by each alternative is discussed in Chapter 4, Environmental Consequences.1 3.1 PROJECT AREA The project area includes the area potentially affected by implementation of the LTEMP (including normal management and experimental operations of Glen Canyon Dam and non-flow actions). This area includes Lake Powell, Glen Canyon Dam, and the river downstream to Lake Mead (Figure 3.1-1). More specifically, the scope primarily encompasses the Colorado River Ecosystem, which includes the Colorado River mainstream corridor and interacting resources in associated riparian and terrace zones, located primarily from the forebay of Glen Canyon Dam to the western boundary of Grand Canyon National Park (GCNP). It includes the area where dam operations impact physical, biological, recreational, cultural, and other resources. This section of the river runs through Glen, Marble, and Grand Canyons in Coconino and Mohave Counties in northwestern Arizona. Although this EIS focuses primarily on the Colorado River Ecosystem, the affected area varies by resources and extends outside of the immediate river corridor for some resources and cumulative impacts. Portions of Glen Canyon National Recreation Area (GCNRA), GCNP, and Lake Mead National Recreation Area (LMNRA) outside the Colorado River Ecosystem are also included in the affected region for certain resources due to the potential effects of LTEMP operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Asters of Yesteryear (Updated April 2018)
    Asters of Yesteryear (Updated April 2018) About this Update: The document was originally posted in a shorter version, to accompany the brief article "Where Have all our Asters Gone?" in the Fall 2017 issue of Sego Lily. In that version it consisted simply of photos of a number of plants that had at some time been included in Aster but that no longer are, as per Flora of North America. In this version I have added names to the photos to indicate how they have changed since their original publication: Date and original name as published (Basionym) IF name used in Intermountain Flora (1994) UF name used in A Utah Flora (1983-2016) FNA name used in Flora of North America (2006) I have also added tables to show the renaming of two groups of species in the Astereae tribe as organized in Intermountain Flora. Color coding shows how splitting of the major genera largely follows fault lines already in place No color Renamed Bright Green Conserved Various Natural groupings $ Plant not in Utah It is noteworthy how few species retain the names used in 1994, but also how the renaming often follows patterns already observed. Asters of Yesteryear (Updated April 2018) Here are larger photos (16 inches wide or tall at normal screen resolution of 72 dpi) of the plants shown in Sego Lily of Fall 2017, arranged by date of original publication. None of them (except Aster amellus on this page) are now regarded as true asters – but they all were at one stage in their history. Now all are in different genera, most of them using names that were published over 100 years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 3-2020 A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California" (2020). Botanical Studies. 42. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/42 This Flora of California is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A LIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS ENDEMIC TO CALIFORNIA Compiled By James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Arcata, California 13 February 2020 CONTENTS Willis Jepson (1923-1925) recognized that the assemblage of plants that characterized our flora excludes the desert province of southwest California Introduction. 1 and extends beyond its political boundaries to include An Overview. 2 southwestern Oregon, a small portion of western Endemic Genera . 2 Nevada, and the northern portion of Baja California, Almost Endemic Genera . 3 Mexico. This expanded region became known as the California Floristic Province (CFP). Keep in mind that List of Endemic Plants . 4 not all plants endemic to California lie within the CFP Plants Endemic to a Single County or Island 24 and others that are endemic to the CFP are not County and Channel Island Abbreviations .
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Letter Submitted by the Wilderness Society Et Al On
    Appendix A Letter submitted by The Wilderness Society et al on September 6, 2016 on the Preliminary Wilderness Evaluation (without appendices) San Luis Valley Ecosystem Council * The Wilderness Society Defenders of Wildlife * Quiet Use Coalition * Rocky Mountain Wild * Colorado Mountain Club * Rocky Smith * Western Environmental Law Center Ms. Erin Minks, Forest Planner Rio Grande National Forest 1803 W. Highway 160 Monte Vista, CO 81144 September 6, 2016 Via electronic mail followed by a hard copy in the US Post Re: Preliminary Wilderness Evaluation Dear Ms. Minks: The undersigned organizations appreciate the opportunity to provide input in response to your request for comments on the preliminary wilderness evaluation as part of the Rio Grande National Forest Land Management Plan revision. We thank you for the attention and effort that you are devoting to the wilderness inventory and evaluation process, and commend you and your colleagues for thoughtfully navigating the process as detailed in FSH 1909.12, chapter 70. In particular, we are pleased that you are adhering closely to the evaluation criteria presented in section 72 of the handbook. We also liked your approach of ranking the inventoried polygons by the degree to which they have wilderness character, presenting the associated information in a spreadsheet, and displaying the areas by rank on a map. Presenting the information this way made it quite easy to understand and digest. General comments on preliminary evaluation I. Missing information a. Rationale needed to explain rankings is missing for numerous polygons While we recognize that the evaluation outputs are preliminary, we are concerned that the information in the spreadsheet is skeletal and in many places simply missing.
    [Show full text]
  • Kurt Maximillian Neubig EDUCATION PROFESSIONAL APPOINTMENTS
    Kurt Maximillian Neubig Department of Plant Biology, Southern Illinois University Carbondale Carbondale, IL 62901 Email: [email protected] Phone: 352 284 3688 - cell EDUCATION 2006 – 2012 Ph.D., Botany, University of Florida, Gainesville 2003 – 2005 M.S., Botany, University of Florida, Gainesville 1999 – 2003 B.S., Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge PROFESSIONAL APPOINTMENTS 2015 – present Assistant Professor, Dept. of Plant Biology, Southern Illinois University 2013 – present Courtesy Assistant Scientist, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida 2013 – 2014 Postdoctoral Research Assistant, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida 2012 Research Assistant in Herbarium Curation, University of Florida Herbarium, University of Florida 2009 – 2012 Graduate Teaching Assistant, University of Florida 2004 – 2009 Research Assistant in Molecular Systematics, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida 2003 – 2004 Graduate Teaching Assistant, University of Florida 2003 Undergraduate Teaching Assistant, Louisiana State University 2001 – 2003 Herbarium Assistant, Louisiana State University 2001 – 2002 Laboratory Technician, Louisiana State University GRANTS AND AWARDS Funded 2017 – 2022. Collaborative proposal: Upper Delta Region Biodiversity Scholarship PIs: Neubig KM, Anderson FE, Crowe JA, Jimenez FA, Sipes SD Agency: NSF S-STEM Research/Scholarships: $1,726,969 (total funded from all institutions: $4,998,672) 2016 Phylogenetics and taxonomy of Dichanthelium PI: Neubig KM Agency:
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plant Society of New Mexico Albuquerque Chapter
    Albuquerque Chapter Native Plant Society of New Mexico 2017 Autumn Issue Page 1 Native Plant Society of New Mexico Albuquerque Chapter Rare Plants and Volcanic Surprises? By Pam McBride From Left: Curtis Miller, Jonathan Ice, George Miller, Doris Eng, Kent Condie, Pam McBride, Morgan Loven, Judith Phillips, Gary Runyan, Dana Price, Mona Price, Mike Price Not shown: Philip Clark, photographer, Lenore and Larry Goodell, Ed and Mary Chappelle, Mary and Ted Pockman It is a long trip out to the El Calderon Area located within the El Malpais National Monument, approximately 200 miles round-trip, but 19 participants found that it was well worth the effort on August 26, 2017. Over 60 species in flower were identified by Lenore Goodell, Doris Eng, and the author on a scouting trip on August 22. Several more were identified during the field trip or are still in the process of being identified. The big hits were purple and white owl clover (Orthocarpus purpureoalbus), Bailey’s rabbitbrush (Lorandersonia cf. baileyi), Orthocarpus purpureoalbus Purple and white owl clover Photo © Pam McBride Albuquerque Chapter Native Plant Society of New Mexico 2017 Autumn Issue Page 2 Left and above, closeup of Geranium lentum Photo © George Miller Geranium lentum, Mogollon Geranium Photo © Pam McBride Crestrib morning glory (Ipomoea costellata), a white geranium with reflexed petals, identified by George Miller as Mogollon geranium (Geranium lentum), and of course the cinders phacelia (Phacelia serrata). Cinders phacelia grows in loose volcanic cinders in two disjunct regions in the U.S.: around the San Francisco Mountains (Flagstaff and Sunset Crater) and around the El Malpais National Monument.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Ericameria, Chrysothamnus and Related Genera (Asteraceae : Astereae) Based on Nuclear Ribosomal DNA Sequence Data Roland P
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2002 Phylogeny of Ericameria, Chrysothamnus and related genera (Asteraceae : Astereae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA sequence data Roland P. Roberts Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Recommended Citation Roberts, Roland P., "Phylogeny of Ericameria, Chrysothamnus and related genera (Asteraceae : Astereae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA sequence data" (2002). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 3881. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3881 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. PHYLOGENY OF ERICAMERIA, CHRYSOTHAMNUS AND RELATED GENERA (ASTERACEAE: ASTEREAE) BASED ON NUCLEAR RIBOSOMAL DNA SEQUENCE DATA A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In The Department of Biological Sciences by Roland P. Roberts B.S.Ed., Southwest Texas State University, 1991 M.S., Southwest Texas State University, 1996 December, 2002 DEDICATION I dedicate this dissertation to my son Roland H. Roberts, my mother Rosetta Roberts and my niece Colleen Roberts, for being a continued source of mutual love and respect. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation was developed under the direction of my advisor, Dr. Lowell E. Urbatsch, Director of the Louisiana State University Herbarium and Associate Professor in the Department of Biological Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • State of NEW MEXICO 2014 Wetland Plant List
    4/2/14 & n s p State of NEW MEXICO 2014 Wetland Plant List Lichvar, R.W., M. Butterw ick, N.C. Melvin, and W.N. Kirchner. 2014. The National Wetland Plant List: 2014 Update of Wetland Ratings. Phytoneuron 2014-41: 1-42. http://wetland_plants.usace.army.mil/ Sisyrinchium demissum Greene (Stif f Blue-Ey ed-Grass) Photo: Lewis E. Epple User Notes: 1) Plant species not listed are considered UPL for w etland delineation purposes. 2) A few UPL species are listed because they are rated FACU or w etter in at least one Corps region. 3) Some state boundaries lie w ithin tw o or more Corps Regions. If a species occurs in one region but not the other, its rating w ill be show n in one column and the other column w ill be BLANK. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 1/24 4/2/14 State of NEW MEXICO 2014 Wetland Plant List Total Species = 1506 AW GP WMVC OBL 273 266 266 FACW 337 330 320 FAC 338 329 345 FACU 450 390 430 UPL 100 126 116 Regional Totals 1498 1441 1477 Scientific Name Authorship AW GP WMVC Common Name Abies bifolia A. Murr. FACU FACU Rocky Mountain Alpine Fir Abutilon theophrasti Medik. UPL UPL FACU Velv etleaf Acer glabrum Torr. FAC FAC FACU Rocky Mountain Maple Acer grandidentatum Nutt. FACU FAC FACU Cany on Maple Acer negundo L. FACW FAC FAC Ash-Leaf Maple Acer saccharinum L. FAC FAC FAC Silv er Maple Achillea millefolium L. FACU FACU FACU Common Yarrow Achnatherum hymenoides (Roemer & J.A.
    [Show full text]