News and Views for Scouting in Gloucestershire January 2019
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Cheltenham Borough Council and Tewkesbury Borough Council Final Assessment Report November 2016
CHELTENHAM BOROUGH COUNCIL AND TEWKESBURY BOROUGH COUNCIL FINAL ASSESSMENT REPORT NOVEMBER 2016 QUALITY, INTEGRITY, PROFESSIONALISM Knight, Kavanagh & Page Ltd Company No: 9145032 (England) MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS Registered Office: 1 -2 Frecheville Court, off Knowsley Street, Bury BL9 0UF T: 0161 764 7040 E: [email protected] www.kkp.co.uk CHELTENHAM AND TEWKESBURY COUNCILS BUILT LEISURE AND SPORTS ASSESSMENT REPORT CONTENTS SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 1 SECTION 2: BACKGROUND ........................................................................................... 4 SECTION 3: INDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES ASSESSMENT APPROACH ................... 16 SECTION 4: SPORTS HALLS ........................................................................................ 18 SECTION 5: SWIMMING POOLS ................................................................................... 38 SECTION 6: HEALTH AND FITNESS SUITES ............................................................... 53 SECTION 7: SQUASH COURTS .................................................................................... 62 SECTION 8: INDOOR BOWLS ....................................................................................... 68 SECTION 9: INDOOR TENNIS COURTS ....................................................................... 72 SECTION 10: ATHLETICS ............................................................................................. 75 SECTION 11: COMMUNITY FACILITIES ...................................................................... -
THE FOREST of DEAN GLOUCESTERSHIRE Archaeological Survey Stage 1: Desk-Based Data Collection Project Number 2727
THE FOREST OF DEAN GLOUCESTERSHIRE Archaeological Survey Stage 1: Desk-based data collection Project Number 2727 Volume 2 Appendices Jon Hoyle Gloucestershire County Council Environment Department Archaeology Service November 2008 © Archaeology Service, Gloucestershire County Council, November 2008 1 Contents Appendix A Amalgamated solid geology types 11 Appendix B Forest Enterprise historic environment management categories 13 B.i Management Categories 13 B.ii Types of monument to be assigned to each category 16 B.iii Areas where more than one management category can apply 17 Appendix C Sources systematically consulted 19 C.i Journals and periodicals and gazetteers 19 C.ii Books, documents and articles 20 C.iii Map sources 22 C.iv Sources not consulted, or not systematically searched 25 Appendix D Specifications for data collection from selected source works 29 D.i 19th Century Parish maps: 29 D.ii SMR checking by Parish 29 D.iii New data gathering by Parish 29 D.iv Types of data to be taken from Parish maps 29 D.v 1608 map of the western part of the Forest of Dean: Source Works 1 & 2919 35 D.vi Other early maps sources 35 D.vii The Victoria History of the County of Gloucester: Source Works 3710 and 894 36 D.viii Listed buildings information: 40 D.ix NMR Long Listings: Source ;Work 4249 41 D.x Coleford – The History of a West Gloucestershire Town, Hart C, 1983, Source Work 824 41 D.xi Riverine Dean, Putley J, 1999: Source Work 5944 42 D.xii Other text-based sources 42 Appendix E Specifications for checking or adding certain types of -
Full Council Minutes 21St January 2021
WHEATPIECES PARISH COUNCIL FULL COUNCIL MEETING ON THURSDAY 21st JANUARY 2021 AT 7.00PM DUE TO THE CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC THIS MEETING WAS HELD REMOTELY VIA ZOOM VIDEO CONFERENCING PRESENT: Cllr. Meredith, Cllr. Reid, Cllr. Abel, Cllr. Dempster Cllr. Pullen, Cllr. Shyamapant IN ATTENDANCE: County Cllr. V Smith A Fendt (Community Centre Manager) T Shurmer (Clerk) MINUTES Cllr. Meredith welcomed all to the on-line Wheatpieces Parish Council meeting in these continuing ongoing uncertain times. 963/FC - PUBLIC PARTICIPATION No members of the public were in attendance. 964/FC - APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Apologies were received and accepted from Cllr. Mulholland 965/FC - DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST No declarations of interest were made. 966/FC -TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD ON THURSDAY 1ST OCTOBER 2020 The minutes of the Full Council meeting held on Thursday 1st October 2020 were approved and adopted. Proposed: Cllr. Abel Seconded: Cllr. Dempster Agreed 967/FC – COUNTY COUNCILLOR’S REPORT ➢ County Cllr. Smith had sent various reports from Gloucestershire County Council (GCC) for the meeting, these had been duly circulated to all and were taken as read. ➢ Cllr. Smith enquired if there was an update on the installation of the defibrillator at the Wheatpieces public house. Cllr. Meredith advised that the public house is currently closed due to lockdown and that he will contact the licensees when normality resumes, however, he advised that the defibrillator is for indoor use and could be installed by the maintenance team for the public house. 1 FC Mins – 21/1/2021 (963/FC-977/FC) ➢ Cllr. Smith advised that the M5 jct.9 off road solution is still not finalised and talks are continuing with Highways England for a solution. -
Tewkesbury Borough Council Our Ref: PINSM/G1630/429/5 Council Offices Date: December 2003 Gloucester Road TEWKESBURY Gloucestershire GL20 5TT
The Planning Inspectorate 4/04 Kite Wing Direct Line 0117 372 8902 Temple Quay House Switchboard 0117-372 8000 2 The Square Fax No 0117-372 6241 Temple Quay GTN Bristol BS1 6PN http://www.planning-inspectorate.gov.uk Mrs Terri Turner Bsc(Econ) MSc MRTPI Your Ref: Chief Executive Tewkesbury Borough Council Our Ref: PINSM/G1630/429/5 Council Offices Date: December 2003 Gloucester Road TEWKESBURY Gloucestershire GL20 5TT Dear Madam TEWKESBURY BOROUGH LOCAL PLAN TO 2011 REPORT OF PUBLIC LOCAL INQUIRY INTO OBJECTIONS 1. Attached is my report of the Inquiry which opened on 5 March 2002 at the Council’s offices, Gloucester Road, Tewkesbury. The Inquiry was into objections to the Tewkesbury Borough Local Plan to 2011. The Inquiry sat on 62 days between March and December 2002 and was formally closed on 4 March 2003. The report contains my recommendations on the action which the Council should take in respect of all the objections that were not formally withdrawn by the close of the Inquiry. 2. A Pre-Inquiry Meeting was held on 5 December 2001 at the Council’s offices in Tewkesbury, when procedural matters were clarified for the benefit of those intending to take part in the Inquiry. 3. At the opening of the Inquiry the Council’s compliance with all the appropriate statutory formalities was confirmed. The Inquiry then proceeded with the hearing of objections; some were organised as informal hearings, others were held in the traditional adversarial manner, and two `round table sessions’ were held in which the Council and objectors took part in a structured discussion about the overall housing provision and affordable housing. -
How a Piece of the Wall Ended up in Gloucester Page 10 COMARRC’S INTRODUCTION
the Voice of Innsworth Station imjinAutumn 2019 West of berlin How a piece of the Wall ended up in Gloucester page 10 COMARRC’S INTRODUCTION Herewith the autumn edition of the imjin magazine. Returning from NATO service overseas, I was delighted to take the helm from General Tim Radford and plan to continue his work here. The focus in this edition is to celebrate our heritage with anniversaries stretching from the beaches of Normandy to the fall of the Berlin Wall. It is difficult not to be struck by the opportunities arising from service with the Allied Rapid Reaction Corps, Signals Brigade and those in Innsworth Station. Professionally we have an interesting, varied and suitably demanding training programme over the months ahead that will keep us sharp. The decision to make us the Corps Warfighting Headquarters for the next two years will drive our programme, the most immediate manifestation of which will be Exercise ‘ARRCADE FUSION’ in Cornwall this autumn. This will give purpose and, perhaps serendipitously, a degree of healthy specialisation. Concurrent experimentation is innovative and potentially transformational. Separately, the benefits are then relayed as training support from Estonia to Japan. It is an exciting prospect. On a more personal level, whether as an individual or family, opportunity abounds. The Cotswolds are on our doorstep and there is a wealth of opportunity in Gloucester, Cheltenham and Tewkesbury, quite aside from the broader opportunities further afield in the United Kingdom. The ARRC International Club is well placed to help British and foreign families alike. We shall maintain an attractive series of trips to see the hardy perennials and more bespoke visits of specific interest. -
Coleford Neighbourhood Development Plan
2017–2026 2017 © Chris Howell Coleford Neighbourhood Development Plan 2017– 2026 Main document Print items available through Coleford Town Council, Maps all digital documents available Main Map 1 Appendix A Appendices Publication Coleford NDP Coleford through the website below. A4 designated character assessments 72pp area A4 Indicates only available digitally/DVD A4 104pp Indicates available in print and digitally/DVD Map 2 Map 3 Map 4 Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Coleford town centre Gateways into Coleford town centre Consultations FoDDC Site Access & conservation area town centre FoDDC allocations to early 2017 housing assessments surveys A3/A4 A3/A4 Plan A3/A4 A4, 66pp figures A4, 211pp A4, 5pp A4, 8pp Map 5 Map 6 Map 7 Appendix F Appendix G Appendix H Appendix J 2 Coleford town Coleford NDP FoDDC allocations Community facilities Coleford valued Coleford green Traffic sites 1–7 development plan and services heritage assets spaces surveys A4 sites A3/A4 A4, 4pp A4, 8pp A4, 7pp A4, 7pp A3/A4 Map 8 Map 9 Map 10 Appendix K Appendix L Appendix M Appendix N Local green spaces Bells Field Character Newland – response Tree preservation Ancient monuments Landscape character A3/A4 A3/A4 assessment to mineral plan orders archaeology assessment A3/A4 A4, 30pp A4, 2pp A4, 8pp Bells Field A4, 5pp Map 11 Map 12 Map 13 Appendix P Appendix Q Appendix R Appendix S Coleford heritage Coleford heritage Valued Views Uses classes order Core strategy Coleford valued views Consultation features North features South A3/A4 A4, 4pp proposals map -
Local Economic Assessment: 2011
Gloucestershire Local Economic Assessment: 2011 Report for GFirst, compiled by Inform Gloucestershire www.gfirst.co.uk GFirst Local Enterprise Partnership Gloucestershire Local Economic Assessment: 2011 Front cover image courtesy of Messier Dowty This report was published on 1st October, 2011. It was commissioned by the GFirst Local Enterprise Partnership and compiled by the Inform Gloucestershire Research and Intelligence Team both of whom are supported by Gloucestershire County Council. The report is available online from the GFirst or Inform Gloucestershire websites www.gfirst.co.uk or www.gloucestershire.gov.uk/inform Gloucestershire Local Economic Assessment: 2011 Executive Summary www.gfirst.co.uk GFirst Local Enterprise Partnership Executive Summary Contents Executive summary 1 Overview 1 2: Geography 1 3: People and Communities 1 4: Business and Enterprise 2 5: Functional Economic Market Areas 3 6: Sustainable Economic Growth 3 Key Issues 4 Future Research 6 Final SWOT analysis 7 Local Economic Assessment Gloucestershire - Executive Summary i Executive Summary This summary presents a brief overview of each chapter comprising the assessment. The key issues section attempts to identify the strengths of the Gloucestershire economy, the inter-relationships that may exist and po- tential threats that are brought out through the use of SWOT analyses. Areas of future research have been iden- tified where gaps in the data have precluded sufficient analysis. Overview 2: Geography Gloucestershire is the northernmost County in the South West region and is divided into six districts all with quite different characteristics. It has been a significant location for commerce since Roman times and located at a cross roads between Wales and London and the West Midlands and the South West it continues to be advanta- geous as a business location. -
JCS Infrastructure Delivery Plan
Gloucester City Council, Cheltenham Borough Council & Tewkesbury Borough Council Final Report Issue | August 2014 JCS Infrastructure Delivery Plan Gloucester City Council, Cheltenham Borough Council & Tewkesbury Borough Council Infrastructure Delivery Plan Final Report Report Ref Issue | 4 August 2014 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number 226824 Ove Arup & Partners Ltd 63 St Thomas Street Bristol BS1 6JZ United Kingdom www.arup.com Gloucester City Council, Cheltenham Borough Council & Tewkesbury Infrastructure Delivery Plan Borough Council Final Report Contents Page Executive Summary 1 IDP Development Scenarios 2 Report Structure 4 Infrastructure Requirements 4 Cross Boundary Infrastructure 5 Sector Analysis 5 Implementation 14 Categorisation 15 Prioritisation for Delivery 16 Funding . 17 Management and Co-ordination 18 Recommendations and Next Steps 18 1 Introduction 20 1.1 Purpose of the Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) 20 1.2 Structure of the IDP 21 2 Methodology 22 2.1 National Policy & Guidance 22 2.2 Summary of IDP Project Stages and Outputs 23 2.3 Stage 1 – Development Vision, Scenarios and IDP Governance 24 2.4 Stage B – County-wide evidence gathering and assessment of infrastructure needs 26 2.5 Stage C – Delivery Plan preparation 28 2.6 IDP Refresh 29 3 Context for the IDP 30 3.1 Infrastructure assessment sub-areas 30 3.2 Overview of Development -
Joint Core Strategy
Joint Core Strategy Landscape Characterisation Assessment and Sensitivity Analysis Contents page Introduction i-iv Gloucester Landscape Character Analysis 1-28 Sensitivity 29-48 Cheltenham Landscape Character Analysis 49-60 Sensitivity 61-74 Tewkesbury Landscape Character Analysis 75-90 Sensitivity 91-100 Appendices Gloucester LCA Map 1 Cheltenham LCA Map 2 Tewkesbury LCA Map 3 Gloucester LSA Map 4 Cheltenham LSA Map 5 Tewkesbury LSA Map 6 INTRODUCTION This work has been prepared as part of the evidence for the Joint Core Strategy to provide landscape character and sensitivity analysis around the urban centres of Gloucester, Cheltenham and Tewkesbury. The report has been broken down into the three JCS urban centres – land around Gloucester, land around Cheltenham and land around Tewkesbury. It also includes land around Bishop‟s Cleeve and though it is not considered that this settlement forms part of the urban area of Cheltenham, its proximity to Cheltenham has led to its wider exploration. The analysis comprised of two distinct areas of work: The first was a landscape characterisation process where the landscape around the settlements was surveyed and divided into distinct character areas. Each area was then described following the standard methodology described below. Once the landscape character had been spatially identified and then described, the second area of work - a sensitivity analysis followed. The objective of this work was to assign relative value as to the sensitivity of the landscape to large scale development, with the main output being the maps that show the various sensitivities for the specific areas. The intention is that these are used as one part of the process to identify development sites within the JCS area. -
Operational Response Overview September 2015
Operational Response Overview September 2015 Forward As an organisation the Service faces many challenges. The ever changing environment requires the Service to change in order to ensure it is able to secure an effective and efficient service for the community. Considerable steps forward over the past ten years have been taken making significant savings whilst continuing to maintain a high quality service and reduce the number of calls attended. Over the next three years the Integrated Risk Management Plan clearly states the tasks the Service has to undertake. Year one beginning with a fundamental review of operational response, development of risk based response targets and the development of a demand management service delivery model. To continue the journey the Service needs to fully focus upon reducing risk and thereby bringing down further the number of incidents it attends. The Service needs to ensure it keeps the community safer than ever before even though some tough decisions lie ahead. The Service needs to produce an integrated approach matching resources to risk within our county. In order for it to make recommendations and sound decisions clear and concise information and evidence is required, which is underpinned by a clear method for identifying and quantifying risks in our community. This operational response review will allow the Service to develop a response based on risk. A demand management model will be embedded, integrating both Protection and Prevention initiatives. Contents Page Number 1. Executive Summary 1 2. Introduction 5 3. About Our County 6 4. Our Response Targets 11 5. Data Sources: Where our information comes from 15 6. -
Iron Age and Romano-British, by Neil Holbrook
EXCAVATIONS AT RUDGEWAY LANE, WALTON CARDIFF, NEAR TEWKESBURY, 2004-2005 Iron Age and Romano-British, by Neil Holbrook While the settlement at Rudgeway Lane bears many comparisons with Romano-British Sites I and 11 on the Eastern Relief Road, it does provide a number of fresh insights into the nature of later Iron Age and Romano-British rural settlement in this part of the Severn Valley. Preservation was better at this site than at the other two, and the recovery of insect fauna and human skeletal remains provides evidence not encountered there. The earliest activity detectable in Area D was the construction in Period 2 of a small ditched enclosure, c. 25m long by 20m wide, with a south-east facing entrance (Enclosure 1; Fig. 20). No evidence of any internal features was found. The small quantities of pottery recovered from the ditch are consistent with occupation at some point within the period from the 4th to 2nd century BC. This small enclosure invites comparison with similar-sized rectilinear examples at Beckford 11 and Evesham in Worcestershire, the latter also dating to the Middle Iron Age (Edwards and Hurst 2000; Moore 2006, 91-2). At these sites the enclosures appear to be one element within larger polyfocal unenclosed settlements, and this may also have been the case here, although no other Middle Iron Age features were found in the excavated areas. However it should be borne in mind that mass-built houses which did not possess drip gullies can be virtually invisible to detect through geophysical survey or indeed excavation (Holbrook 2003, 63). -
Village and Community Agent End of Year Report
Gloucestershire Village & Community Agents April 2013 to March 2014 Full Year Report Kate Darch Village and Community Agents Manager 01452 528491 Gloucestershire Village & Community Agents Managed by GRCC Jointly funded by Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group contents Executive Summary 3 1.0 Background, Objectives and Outcomes& Glossary of terms 4 2.0 Outcome 1, Gateway forms, scheme statistics, district breakdowns 6 3.0 Outcomes 2& 4, Support, publicity, community activity 13 4.0 Outcome 3, Preventative measures, Community Links &Agency referrals 16 5.0 Outcome 5, Influencing and Identifying gaps & issues 19 6.0 Recruitment and Staffing 21 7.0 Additional Activity 22 8.1 2014-15 Moving Forward 23 Appendix i Case Studies 24 2 2013-14 FULL YEAR REPORT Executive Summary ● 38 Village and Community Agents operate countywide including in Cheltenham and Gloucester ● Between April 2013 and March 2014, 7,425 ‘Gateway’ forms I honestly do were submitted by Agents ‘’ not know what ● 81% of gateway forms submitted were for community related we would do activity, community led solutions, signposting and information finding and supporting clients without her Stroud GP Practice ● Referrals to partner agencies amounted to 19% (1,407) Manager ● The top five agencies referred to were: March 2014 ■ The Adult and Social Care Helpdesk ■ Age UK ■ DWP ■ Gloucestershire Fire and Rescue ■ Gloucestershire Constabulary and PCSOs ● 52% of clients seen were new clients to the scheme ● 57% of clients were female ● 26% of clients were aged over the age of 80 ● 40% of clients lived alone 3 GLOUCESTERSHIRE VILLAGE AND COMMUNITY AGENTS 1.0 Background Gloucestershire Village and Community Agents is Objectives funded by Gloucestershire County Council and 1.