DOCSLIB.ORG

Introduction to Quantum Field Theory and Matter Under Extreme Conditions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Introduction to Quantum Field Theory and Matter Under Extreme Conditions Introduction to Quantum Field Theory and Matter under Extreme Conditions Prof. Dr. David Blaschke Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Wroclaw, Poland Bogoliubov Laboratory for Theoretical Physics, JINR Dubna, Russia Summer Semester 2007 Abstract The series of lectures gives an introduction to the modern formulation of quan- tum field theories using Feynman path integrals. The formalism is developed first for the vacuum case and is then generalized to the conditions of finite tem- peratures, densities and strong fields with special emphasis on phase transitions, processes of particle creation in Quantum Field Theories of strong, electro-weak and gravitational interactions. Applications of the formalism are considered in the physics of condensed matter, plasma physics, ultrarelativistic heavy-ion colli- sions, high-intensity optical and X-ray lasers and the physics of compact objects such as neutron stars and black holes. Contents 1 Quantum Fields at Zero Temperature 1 1.1 Introduction . 1 1.2 Minkowski Space Conventions . 3 1.2.1 Four Vectors . 3 1.2.2 Dirac Matrices . 4 1.3 Dirac Equation . 6 1.3.1 Free Particle Solutions . 6 1.4 Green Functions . 9 1.4.1 Free-Fermion Propagator . 10 1.4.2 Green Function for the Interacting Theory . 13 1.4.3 Exercises . 14 1.5 Path Integral in Quantum Mechanics . 14 1.6 Functional Integral in Quantum Field Theory . 16 1.6.1 Scalar Field . 17 1.6.2 Lagrangian Formulation of Quantum Field Theory . 19 1.6.3 Quantum Field Theory for a Free Scalar Field . 20 1.6.4 Scalar Field with Self-Interactions . 21 1.6.5 Exercises . 22 1.7 Functional Integral for Fermions . 23 1.7.1 Finitely Many Degrees of Freedom . 23 1.7.2 Fermionic Quantum Field . 26 1.7.3 Generating Functional for Free Dirac Fields . 28 1.7.4 Exercises . 31 1.8 Functional Integral for Gauge Field Theories . 31 1.8.1 Faddeev-Popov Determinant and Ghosts . 34 1.8.2 Exercises . 42 1.9 Dyson-Schwinger Equations . 42 1.9.1 Photon Vacuum Polarization . 42 1.9.2 Fermion Self Energy . 47 1.9.3 Exercises . 49 1.10 Perturbation Theory . 50 1.10.1 Quark Self Energy . 50 1 1.10.2 Dimensional Regularization . 53 1.10.3 Regularized Quark Self Energy . 57 1.10.4 Exercises . 59 1.11 Renormalized Quark Self Energy . 60 1.11.1 Renormalized Lagrangian . 60 1.11.2 Renormalization Schemes . 63 1.11.3 Renormalized Gap Equation . 66 1.11.4 Exercises . 68 1.12 Dynamical Chiral Symmetry Breaking . 68 1.12.1 Euclidean Metric . 68 1.12.2 Chiral Symmetry . 73 1.12.3 Mass Where There Was None . 75 References . 82 2 Quantum Fields at Finite Temperature and Density 84 2.1 Ensembles and Partition Function . 84 2.1.1 Partition function in Quantum Statistics and Quantum Field Theory . 85 2.1.2 Equivalence of Path Integral and Statistical Operator rep- resentation for the Partition function . 86 2.1.3 Bosonic Fields . 90 2.1.4 Fermionic Fields . 93 2.1.5 Gauge Fields . 95 2.2 Interacting Fermion Systems: Hubbard-Stratonovich Trick . 98 2.2.1 Walecka Model . 98 2.2.2 Nambu{Jona-Lasinio (NJL) Model . 98 2.2.3 Mesonic correlations at finite temperature . 106 2.2.4 Matsubara frequency sums . 107 3 Particle Production by Strong Fields 112 3.1 Introduction . 112 3.2 Dynamics of pair creation . 113 3.2.1 Creation of fermion pairs . 113 3.2.2 Creation of boson pairs . 118 3.3 Discussion of the source term . 119 3.3.1 Properties of the source term . 119 3.3.2 Numerical results . 121 3.4 Summary . 124 4 Problem sets - statistical QFT 127 4.1 Partition function - Introduction . 127 4.2 Partition function - Fermi systems . 128 4.3 Partition function - Quark matter . 129 5 Projects 130 5.1 Symmetry breaking. Goldstone-Theorem. Higgs-Effect . 130 5.1.1 Spontaneous symmetry breaking: Complex scalar field . 130 5.1.2 Electroweak symmetry breaking: Higgs mechanism . 131 Chapter 1 Quantum Fields at Zero Temperature 1.1 Introduction This is the first part of a series of lectures whose aim is to provide the tools for the completion of a realistic calculation in quantum field theory (QFT) as it is relevant to Hadron Physics. Hadron Physics lies at the interface between nuclear and particle (high en- ergy) physics. Its focus is an elucidation of the role played by quarks and gluons in the structure of, and interactions between, hadrons. This was once parti- cle physics but that has since moved to higher energy in search of a plausible grand unified theory and extensions of the so-called Standard Model. The only high-energy physicists still focusing on hadron physics are those performing the numerical experiments necessary in the application of lattice gauge theory, and those pushing at the boundaries of applicability of perturbative QCD or trying to find new kinematic regimes of validity. There are two types of hadron: baryons and mesons: the proton and neu- tron are baryons; and the pion and kaon are mesons. Historically the names distinguished the particle classes by their mass but it is now known that there are structural differences: hadrons are bound states, and mesons and baryons are composed differently. Hadron physics is charged with the responsibility of providing a detailed understanding of the differences. To appreciate the difficulties inherent in this task it is only necessary to re- member that even the study of two-electron atoms is a computational challenge. This is in spite of the fact that one can employ the Schr¨odinger equation for this problem and, since it is not really necessary to quantize the electromagnetic field, the underlying theory has few complications. The theory underlying hadron physics is quantum chromodynamics (QCD), and its properties are such that a simple understanding and simple calculations 1 are possible only for a very small class of problems. Even on the domain for which a perturbative application of the theory is appropriate, the final (observable) states in any experiment are always hadrons, and not quarks or gluons, so that complications arise in the comparison of theory with experiment. The premier experimental facility for exploring the physics of hadrons is the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (TJNAF), in Newport News, Vir- ginia. Important experiments are also performed at the Fermilab National Ac- celerator Facility (FermiLab), in Batavia, Illinois, and at the Deutsches Elek- tronensynchrotron (DESY) in Hamburg. These facilities use high-energy probes and/or large momentum-transfer processes to explore the transition from the nonperturbative to the perturbative domain in QCD. On the basis of the introduction to nonperturbative methods in QFT in the vacuum, we will develop in the second part of the lecture series the tools for a generalization to the situation many-particle systems of hadrons at finite tem- peratures and densities in thermodynamical equilibrium within the Matsubara formalism. The third part in the series of lectures is devoted to applications for the QCD phase transition from hadronic matter to a quark-gluon plasma (QGP) in relativistic heavy-ion collisions and in the interior of compact stars. Data are provided from a completed program of experiments at the CERN-SPS and presently running programs at RHIC Brookhaven. The future of this direction will soon open a new domain of energy densities (temperatures) at CERN-LHC (2007) and at the future GSI facility FAIR, where construction shall be completed in 2015. The CBM experiment will then allow insights into the QCD phase transition at relatively low temperatures and high baryon densities, a situation which bears already similarities with the interior of compact stars, formed in supernova explosions and observed as pulsars in isolation or in binary systems. Modern astrophysical data have an unprecendented level of accuracy allowing for new stringent constraints on the behavior of the hadronic equation of state at high densities. The final part of lectures enters the domain of nonequilibrium QFT and will focus on a particular problem which, however, plays a central role: particle pro- duction in strong time-dependent external fields. The Schwinger mechanism for pair production as a strict result of quantum electrodynamics (QED) is still not experimentally verified. We are in the fortunate situation that developments of modern laser facilities in the X-ray energy domain with intensities soon reaching the Schwinger limit for electron- positron pair creation from vacuum will allow new insights and experimental tests of approaches to nonperturbative QFT in the strong field situation. These insights will allow generalizations for the other field theories such as the Standard Model and QCD, where still the puzzles of initial conditions in heavy-ion collisions and the origin of matter in the Universe remain to be solved. 1.2 Minkowski Space Conventions In the first part of this lecture series I will use the Minkowski metrics. Later I will employ a Euclidean metric because that is most useful and appropriate for nonperturbative calculations. 1.2.1 Four Vectors Normal spacetime coordinates are denoted by a contravariant four-vector: xµ := (x0; x1; x2; x3) (t; x; y; z): (1.1) ≡ Throughout: c = 1 = h¯, and the conversion between length and energy is just: 1fm = 1=(0:197327 GeV) = 5:06773 GeV−1 : (1.2) The covariant four-vector is obtained by changing the sign of the spatial compo- nents of the contravariant vector: x := (x ; x ; x ; x ) (t; x; y; z) = g xν ; (1.3) µ 0 1 2 3 ≡ − − − µν where the metric tensor is 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 3 gµν = − : (1.4) 0 0 1 0 6 7 6 − 7 6 0 0 0 1 7 4 − 5 µ ν ν The contracted product of two four-vectors is (a; b) := gµνa b = aν b : i.e., a contracted product of a covariant and a contravariant four-vector.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory
    AN INTRODUCTION TO QUANTUM FIELD THEORY By Dr M Dasgupta University of Manchester Lecture presented at the School for Experimental High Energy Physics Students Somerville College, Oxford, September 2009 - 1 - - 2 - Contents 0 Prologue....................................................................................................... 5 1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Lagrangian formalism in classical mechanics......................................... 6 1.2 Quantum mechanics................................................................................... 8 1.3 The Schrödinger picture........................................................................... 10 1.4 The Heisenberg picture............................................................................ 11 1.5 The quantum mechanical harmonic oscillator ..................................... 12 Problems .............................................................................................................. 13 2 Classical Field Theory............................................................................. 14 2.1 From N-point mechanics to field theory ............................................... 14 2.2 Relativistic field theory ............................................................................ 15 2.3 Action for a scalar field ............................................................................ 15 2.4 Plane wave solution to the Klein-Gordon equation ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Field Theory*
    Quantum Field Theory y Frank Wilczek Institute for Advanced Study, School of Natural Science, Olden Lane, Princeton, NJ 08540 I discuss the general principles underlying quantum eld theory, and attempt to identify its most profound consequences. The deep est of these consequences result from the in nite number of degrees of freedom invoked to implement lo cality.Imention a few of its most striking successes, b oth achieved and prosp ective. Possible limitation s of quantum eld theory are viewed in the light of its history. I. SURVEY Quantum eld theory is the framework in which the regnant theories of the electroweak and strong interactions, which together form the Standard Mo del, are formulated. Quantum electro dynamics (QED), b esides providing a com- plete foundation for atomic physics and chemistry, has supp orted calculations of physical quantities with unparalleled precision. The exp erimentally measured value of the magnetic dip ole moment of the muon, 11 (g 2) = 233 184 600 (1680) 10 ; (1) exp: for example, should b e compared with the theoretical prediction 11 (g 2) = 233 183 478 (308) 10 : (2) theor: In quantum chromo dynamics (QCD) we cannot, for the forseeable future, aspire to to comparable accuracy.Yet QCD provides di erent, and at least equally impressive, evidence for the validity of the basic principles of quantum eld theory. Indeed, b ecause in QCD the interactions are stronger, QCD manifests a wider variety of phenomena characteristic of quantum eld theory. These include esp ecially running of the e ective coupling with distance or energy scale and the phenomenon of con nement.
    [Show full text]
  • Feynman Diagrams, Momentum Space Feynman Rules, Disconnected Diagrams, Higher Correlation Functions
    PHY646 - Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model Even Term 2020 Dr. Anosh Joseph, IISER Mohali LECTURE 05 Tuesday, January 14, 2020 Topics: Feynman Diagrams, Momentum Space Feynman Rules, Disconnected Diagrams, Higher Correlation Functions. Feynman Diagrams We can use the Wick’s theorem to express the n-point function h0jT fφ(x1)φ(x2) ··· φ(xn)gj0i as a sum of products of Feynman propagators. We will be interested in developing a diagrammatic interpretation of such expressions. Let us look at the expression containing four fields. We have h0jT fφ1φ2φ3φ4g j0i = DF (x1 − x2)DF (x3 − x4) +DF (x1 − x3)DF (x2 − x4) +DF (x1 − x4)DF (x2 − x3): (1) We can interpret Eq. (1) as the sum of three diagrams, if we represent each of the points, x1 through x4 by a dot, and each factor DF (x − y) by a line joining x to y. These diagrams are called Feynman diagrams. In Fig. 1 we provide the diagrammatic interpretation of Eq. (1). The interpretation of the diagrams is the following: particles are created at two spacetime points, each propagates to one of the other points, and then they are annihilated. This process can happen in three different ways, and they correspond to the three ways to connect the points in pairs, as shown in the three diagrams in Fig. 1. Thus the total amplitude for the process is the sum of these three diagrams. PHY646 - Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model Even Term 2020 ⟨0|T {ϕ1ϕ2ϕ3ϕ4}|0⟩ = DF(x1 − x2)DF(x3 − x4) + DF(x1 − x3)DF(x2 − x4) +DF(x1 − x4)DF(x2 − x3) 1 2 1 2 1 2 + + 3 4 3 4 3 4 Figure 1: Diagrammatic interpretation of Eq.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Supersymmetry
    An Introduction to Supersymmetry Ulrich Theis Institute for Theoretical Physics, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Max-Wien-Platz 1, D–07743 Jena, Germany [email protected] This is a write-up of a series of five introductory lectures on global supersymmetry in four dimensions given at the 13th “Saalburg” Summer School 2007 in Wolfersdorf, Germany. Contents 1 Why supersymmetry? 1 2 Weyl spinors in D=4 4 3 The supersymmetry algebra 6 4 Supersymmetry multiplets 6 5 Superspace and superfields 9 6 Superspace integration 11 7 Chiral superfields 13 8 Supersymmetric gauge theories 17 9 Supersymmetry breaking 22 10 Perturbative non-renormalization theorems 26 A Sigma matrices 29 1 Why supersymmetry? When the Large Hadron Collider at CERN takes up operations soon, its main objective, besides confirming the existence of the Higgs boson, will be to discover new physics beyond the standard model of the strong and electroweak interactions. It is widely believed that what will be found is a (at energies accessible to the LHC softly broken) supersymmetric extension of the standard model. What makes supersymmetry such an attractive feature that the majority of the theoretical physics community is convinced of its existence? 1 First of all, under plausible assumptions on the properties of relativistic quantum field theories, supersymmetry is the unique extension of the algebra of Poincar´eand internal symmtries of the S-matrix. If new physics is based on such an extension, it must be supersymmetric. Furthermore, the quantum properties of supersymmetric theories are much better under control than in non-supersymmetric ones, thanks to powerful non- renormalization theorems.
    [Show full text]
  • Solutions 4: Free Quantum Field Theory
    QFT PS4 Solutions: Free Quantum Field Theory (22/10/18) 1 Solutions 4: Free Quantum Field Theory 1. Heisenberg picture free real scalar field We have Z 3 d p 1 −i!pt+ip·x y i!pt−ip·x φ(t; x) = 3 p ape + ape (1) (2π) 2!p (i) By taking an explicit hermitian conjugation, we find our result that φy = φ. You need to note that all the parameters are real: t; x; p are obviously real by definition and if m2 is real and positive y y semi-definite then !p is real for all values of p. Also (^a ) =a ^ is needed. (ii) Since π = φ_ = @tφ classically, we try this on the operator (1) to find Z d3p r! π(t; x) = −i p a e−i!pt+ip·x − ay ei!pt−ip·x (2) (2π)3 2 p p (iii) In this question as in many others it is best to leave the expression in terms of commutators. That is exploit [A + B; C + D] = [A; C] + [A; D] + [B; C] + [B; D] (3) as much as possible. Note that here we do not have a sum over two terms A and B but a sum over an infinite number, an integral, but the principle is the same. −i!pt+ip·x −ipx The second way to simplify notation is to write e = e so that we choose p0 = +!p. −i!pt+ip·x ^y y −i!pt+ip·x The simplest way however is to write Abp =a ^pe and Ap =a ^pe .
    [Show full text]
  • A Supersymmetry Primer
    hep-ph/9709356 version 7, January 2016 A Supersymmetry Primer Stephen P. Martin Department of Physics, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb IL 60115 I provide a pedagogical introduction to supersymmetry. The level of discussion is aimed at readers who are familiar with the Standard Model and quantum field theory, but who have had little or no prior exposure to supersymmetry. Topics covered include: motiva- tions for supersymmetry, the construction of supersymmetric Lagrangians, superspace and superfields, soft supersymmetry-breaking interactions, the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM), R-parity and its consequences, the origins of supersymmetry breaking, the mass spectrum of the MSSM, decays of supersymmetric particles, experi- mental signals for supersymmetry, and some extensions of the minimal framework. Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Interlude: Notations and Conventions 13 3 Supersymmetric Lagrangians 17 3.1 The simplest supersymmetric model: a free chiral supermultiplet ............. 18 3.2 Interactions of chiral supermultiplets . ................ 22 3.3 Lagrangians for gauge supermultiplets . .............. 25 3.4 Supersymmetric gauge interactions . ............. 26 3.5 Summary: How to build a supersymmetricmodel . ............ 28 4 Superspace and superfields 30 4.1 Supercoordinates, general superfields, and superspace differentiation and integration . 31 4.2 Supersymmetry transformations the superspace way . ................ 33 4.3 Chiral covariant derivatives . ............ 35 4.4 Chiralsuperfields................................ ........ 37 arXiv:hep-ph/9709356v7 27 Jan 2016 4.5 Vectorsuperfields................................ ........ 38 4.6 How to make a Lagrangian in superspace . .......... 40 4.7 Superspace Lagrangians for chiral supermultiplets . ................... 41 4.8 Superspace Lagrangians for Abelian gauge theory . ................ 43 4.9 Superspace Lagrangians for general gauge theories . ................. 46 4.10 Non-renormalizable supersymmetric Lagrangians . .................. 49 4.11 R symmetries........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Spin-1/2 Fermions in Quantum Field Theory
    Spin-1/2 fermions in quantum field theory µ First, recall that 4-vectors transform under Lorentz transformations, Λ ν, as p′ µ = Λµ pν, where Λ SO(3,1) satisfies Λµ g Λρ = g .∗ A Lorentz ν ∈ ν µρ λ νλ transformation corresponds to a rotation by θ about an axis nˆ [θ~ θnˆ] and ≡ a boost, ζ~ = vˆ tanh−1 ~v , where ~v is the corresponding velocity. Under the | | same Lorentz transformation, a generic field transforms as: ′ ′ Φ (x )= MR(Λ)Φ(x) , where M exp iθ~·J~ iζ~·K~ are N N representation matrices of R ≡ − − × 1 1 the Lorentz group. Defining J~+ (J~ + iK~ ) and J~− (J~ iK~ ), ≡ 2 ≡ 2 − i j ijk k i j [J± , J±]= iǫ J± , [J± , J∓] = 0 . Thus, the representations of the Lorentz algebra are characterized by (j1,j2), 1 1 where the ji are half-integers. (0, 0) is a scalar and (2, 2) is a four-vector. Of 1 1 interest to us here are the spinor representations (2, 0) and (0, 2). ∗ In our conventions, gµν = diag(1 , −1 , −1 , −1). (1, 0): M = exp i θ~·~σ 1ζ~·~σ , butalso (M −1)T = iσ2M(iσ2)−1 2 −2 − 2 (0, 1): [M −1]† = exp i θ~·~σ + 1ζ~·~σ , butalso M ∗ = iσ2[M −1]†(iσ2)−1 2 −2 2 since (iσ2)~σ(iσ2)−1 = ~σ∗ = ~σT − − Transformation laws of 2-component fields ′ β ξα = Mα ξβ , ′ α −1 T α β ξ = [(M ) ] β ξ , ′† α˙ −1 † α˙ † β˙ ξ = [(M ) ] β˙ ξ , ˙ ξ′† =[M ∗] βξ† .
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 12 from Correlation Functions to Amplitudes
    Lecture 12 From Correlation Functions to Amplitudes Up to this point we have been able to compute correlation functions up to a given order in perturbation theory. Our next step is to relate these to amplitudes for physical processes that we can use to compute observables such as scattering cross sections and decay rates. For instance, assuming given initial and final states, we want to compute the amplitude to go from one to the other in the presence of interactions. In order to be able to define initial and final states we consider a situation where the interaction takes place at a localized region of spacetime and the initial state is defined at t ! −∞, whereas the final state is defined at t ! +1. These asymptotic states are well defined particle states. That is, if we have a two-particle state of momentum jp1p2i, this means that the wave- packets associated with each of the particles are strongly peaked at p1 and p2, and are well separated in momentum space. This assumption simplifies our treatment of asymptotic states. The same will be assumed of the final state jp3 : : : pni. We will initially assume these states far into the past and into the future are eigenstates of the free theory. The fact is they are not, even if they are not interacting say through scattering. The reason is that the presence of interactions modifies the parameters of the theory, so even the unperturbed propagation from the far past or to the far future is not described by free eigenstates. However, the results we will derive for free states will still hold with some modifications associated with the shift of the paramenters of the theory (including the fields) in the presence of interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Mechanics Propagator
    Quantum Mechanics_propagator This article is about Quantum field theory. For plant propagation, see Plant propagation. In Quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, the propagator gives the probability amplitude for a particle to travel from one place to another in a given time, or to travel with a certain energy and momentum. In Feynman diagrams, which calculate the rate of collisions in quantum field theory, virtual particles contribute their propagator to the rate of the scattering event described by the diagram. They also can be viewed as the inverse of the wave operator appropriate to the particle, and are therefore often called Green's functions. Non-relativistic propagators In non-relativistic quantum mechanics the propagator gives the probability amplitude for a particle to travel from one spatial point at one time to another spatial point at a later time. It is the Green's function (fundamental solution) for the Schrödinger equation. This means that, if a system has Hamiltonian H, then the appropriate propagator is a function satisfying where Hx denotes the Hamiltonian written in terms of the x coordinates, δ(x)denotes the Dirac delta-function, Θ(x) is the Heaviside step function and K(x,t;x',t')is the kernel of the differential operator in question, often referred to as the propagator instead of G in this context, and henceforth in this article. This propagator can also be written as where Û(t,t' ) is the unitary time-evolution operator for the system taking states at time t to states at time t'. The quantum mechanical propagator may also be found by using a path integral, where the boundary conditions of the path integral include q(t)=x, q(t')=x' .
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Supersymmetry
    Introduction to Supersymmetry J.W. van Holten NIKHEF Amsterdam NL 1 Relativistic particles a. Energy and momentum The energy and momentum of relativistic particles are related by E2 = p2c2 + m2c4: (1) In covariant notation we define the momentum four-vector E E pµ = (p0; p) = ; p ; p = (p ; p) = − ; p : (2) c µ 0 c The energy-momentum relation (1) can be written as µ 2 2 p pµ + m c = 0; (3) where we have used the Einstein summation convention, which implies automatic summa- tion over repeated indices like µ. Particles can have different masses, spins and charges (electric, color, flavor, ...). The differences are reflected in the various types of fields used to describe the quantum states of the particles. To guarantee the correct energy-momentum relation (1), any free field Φ must satisfy the Klein-Gordon equation 2 − 2@µ@ + m2c2 Φ = ~ @2 − 2r2 + m2c2 Φ = 0: (4) ~ µ c2 t ~ Indeed, a plane wave Φ = φ(k) ei(k·x−!t); (5) satisfies the Klein-Gordon equation if E = ~!; p = ~k: (6) From now on we will use natural units in which ~ = c = 1. In these units we can write the plane-wave fields (5) as Φ = φ(p) eip·x = φ(p) ei(p·x−Et): (7) b. Spin Spin is the intrinsic angular momentum of particles. The word `intrinsic' is to be inter- preted somewhat differently for massive and massless particles. For massive particles it is the angular momentum in the rest-frame of the particles, whilst for massless particles {for which no rest-frame exists{ it is the angular momentum w.r.t.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantization of Scalar Field
    Quantization of Scalar Field Wei Wang 2017.10.12 Wei Wang(SJTU) Lectures on QFT 2017.10.12 1 / 41 Contents 1 From classical theory to quantum theory 2 Quantization of real scalar field 3 Quantization of complex scalar field 4 Propagator of Klein-Gordon field 5 Homework Wei Wang(SJTU) Lectures on QFT 2017.10.12 2 / 41 Free classical field Klein-Gordon Spin-0, scalar Klein-Gordon equation µ 2 @µ@ φ + m φ = 0 Dirac 1 Spin- 2 , spinor Dirac equation i@= − m = 0 Maxwell Spin-1, vector Maxwell equation µν µν @µF = 0;@µF~ = 0: Gravitational field Wei Wang(SJTU) Lectures on QFT 2017.10.12 3 / 41 Klein-Gordon field scalar field, satisfies Klein-Gordon equation µ 2 (@ @µ + m )φ(x) = 0: Lagrangian 1 L = @ φ∂µφ − m2φ2 2 µ Euler-Lagrange equation @L @L @µ − = 0: @(@µφ) @φ gives Klein-Gordon equation. Wei Wang(SJTU) Lectures on QFT 2017.10.12 4 / 41 From classical mechanics to quantum mechanics Mechanics: Newtonian, Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Newtonian: differential equations in Cartesian coordinate system. Lagrangian: Principle of stationary action δS = δ R dtL = 0. Lagrangian L = T − V . Euler-Lagrangian equation d @L @L − = 0: dt @q_ @q Wei Wang(SJTU) Lectures on QFT 2017.10.12 5 / 41 Hamiltonian mechanics Generalized coordinates: q ; conjugate momentum: p = @L i j @qj Hamiltonian: X H = q_i pi − L i Hamilton equations @H p_ = − ; @q @H q_ = : @p Time evolution df @f = + ff; Hg: dt @t where f:::g is the Poisson bracket. Wei Wang(SJTU) Lectures on QFT 2017.10.12 6 / 41 Quantum Mechanics Quantum mechanics Hamiltonian: Canonical quantization Lagrangian: Path
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Interacting Fields
    3. Interacting Fields The free field theories that we’ve discussed so far are very special: we can determine their spectrum, but nothing interesting then happens. They have particle excitations, but these particles don’t interact with each other. Here we’ll start to examine more complicated theories that include interaction terms. These will take the form of higher order terms in the Lagrangian. We’ll start by asking what kind of small perturbations we can add to the theory. For example, consider the Lagrangian for a real scalar field, 1 1 λ = @ @µφ m2φ2 n φn (3.1) L 2 µ − 2 − n! n 3 X≥ The coefficients λn are called coupling constants. What restrictions do we have on λn to ensure that the additional terms are small perturbations? You might think that we need simply make “λ 1”. But this isn’t quite right. To see why this is the case, let’s n ⌧ do some dimensional analysis. Firstly, note that the action has dimensions of angular momentum or, equivalently, the same dimensions as ~.Sincewe’veset~ =1,using the convention described in the introduction, we have [S] = 0. With S = d4x ,and L [d4x]= 4, the Lagrangian density must therefore have − R [ ]=4 (3.2) L What does this mean for the Lagrangian (3.1)? Since [@µ]=1,wecanreado↵the mass dimensions of all the factors to find, [φ]=1 , [m]=1 , [λ ]=4 n (3.3) n − So now we see why we can’t simply say we need λ 1, because this statement only n ⌧ makes sense for dimensionless quantities.
    [Show full text]