Doi 10.23859/2587-8344-2020-4-3-2 Роль П.А. Столыпина В Создании
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
International Reports 2/2018
Source: © Nikolay Doychinov, Reuters. Doychinov, © Nikolay Source: Source: © Source: Itar Tass , Reuters. Other Topics Is Islam a Part of Eastern Europe? Thoughts on History, Religion, and National Identity in the Eastern EU Countries Alexander Beribes / Leo Mausbach / Johannes Jungeblut 68 The refugee crisis revealed lines of division in the EU that had previously been hidden, especially with respect to the eastern member states. The discussion in Germany often fails to take sufficient account of the variety of experiences and perspec- tives in these countries. One significant explanatory factor for the reaction to the reception of refugees from Islamic coun- tries is the historic understanding of national identity. The EU expansion eastwards was intended to Visegrád Countries finally remedy almost half a century of Euro- pean division. However, in light of the refugee The Visegrád Group, founded in 1991 and still crisis and conflicting views it brought about on at a lower level of institutionalisation, consists the placement of asylum seekers, stereotypes of Poland, Slovakia, the Czech Republic, and are returning, dividing in media discourse our Hungary. After the four countries achieved continent into “progressive and tolerant West- membership in NATO and the EU, interest in the ern Europeans” on the one hand and “backward cooperation declined. It experienced no signifi- Eastern Europeans” on the other. Despite the fact cant revival until the European refugee crisis of that populist and Islamophobic parties have even 2015. been successful in Western Europe as well, it is crucial to examine the matter in a nuanced light What especially unites the four East-Central when considering the eastern part of the EU. -
Antanas Smetona Topic Guide for Chronicling America (
Antanas Smetona Topic Guide for Chronicling America (http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov) Introduction Antanas Smetona (1874-1944) was born in Užulėnis, Kovno Governorate, Russian Empire. In 1886, he became the only child in his family to go to school, and in 1893, he began attending Jelgava Gymnasium in Latvia. A teacher there promoted Lithuanian language and culture, but the school made everyone use Russian, and Smetona was expelled for non-compliance. After graduating from a different school, Smetona moved to Vilnius where he became active in Lithuanian cultural life, joined the Lithuanian Democratic Party, and worked on various Lithuanian newspapers and periodicals. During World War I, Smetona assisted Lithuanian victims and was elected Chairman of the Council of Lithuania. He was elected the first president of Lithuania in 1919, but was replaced the next year. In 1926, he became president again after helping overthrow the previous president. Following the Soviet Union occupation of Lithuania during World War II, Smetona turned over power to his prime minister and fled the country. He and his family eventually settled in Cleveland, Ohio, where Smetona worked on a history of Lithuania and his memoirs until his 1944 death. Important Dates . August 10 (July 28, Russian calendar), 1874: Antanas Smetona is born in Užulėnis in the Russian Empire. (Russia had annexed Lithuania in 1795.) . 1902: Smetona moves to Vilnius, the largest city and capital of Lithuania. 1918: Smetona signs the Act of Independence of Lithuania. April 4, 1919: State Council of Lithuania elects Smetona the first president of the Republic of Lithuania. 1927: Smetona dissolves parliament. -
100 Treasures of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania
100 Treasures of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania Estonia, of Treasures 100 100 Treasures of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania 1 This book is the joint initiative of and part of the cooperation between the National Heritage Board of the Republic of Estonia, the National Heritage Board of Republic of Latvia and the Department of Cultural Heritage under the Ministry of Culture of the Republic of Lithuania. The book is inspired by the European Year of Cultural Heritage 2018, supported within the framework of a Joint Programme between the European Union and the Council of Europe “2018 European Heritage Days” and has received a grant from the State Culture Capital Foundation of Latvia. Authors of texts: Aistė Bimbirytė-Mackevičienė, Janis Zilgalvis, Siim Raie, Triin Reidla Translation: Kristjan Teder, Madli Kullaste, SIA SERRES, Visuomenės specialaus mokymo ir konsultavimo centras Editing: Carolin Pihlap, Janis Zilgalvis, Nijolė Bitinienė, Reelika Niit, Rita Mikelionytė, Triin Reidla Designer: Tuuli Aule Printed by: Tallinna Raamatutrükikoja OÜ, Laki 26, Tallinn, 12915 ISBN 978-9949-7293-0-2 (printed) ISBN 978-9949-7293-1-9 (pdf) Tallinn, 2018 100 Treasures of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania 2 3 This book is the joint initiative of and part of the cooperation between the National Heritage Board of the Republic of Estonia, the National Heritage Board of Republic of Latvia and the Department of Cultural Heritage under the Ministry of Culture of the Republic of Lithuania. The book is inspired by the European Year of Cultural Heritage 2018, supported within the framework of a Joint Programme between the European Union and the Council of Europe “2018 European Heritage Days” and has received a grant from the State Culture Capital Foundation of Latvia. -
Wild Animals L.P.Sabaneev Copyright © Kaj Granlund
Wild Animals L.P.Sabaneev Copyright © Kaj Granlund 1. edition 2018.8.11 Front Page: Kaj Granlund TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORDS .........................................................................................................................................................5 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................11 Chapter 1 - Geographical distribution of the wolf ..............................................................................................18 Notes on Chapter I .....................................................................................................................................32 Chapter 2 - Description of the wolf .............................................................................................46 Notes on Chapter II ....................................................................................................................................58 Chapter 3 - Wolves’ life in wintertime .................................................................................................................69 Notes on Chapter III ...................................................................................................................................76 Chapter 4 - Wolves’ summer ...............................................................................................................................81 Notes on Chapter IV ...................................................................................................................................89 -
Lithuanian Collectors Coins
In the spring of 1864, after a pause in the winter, the insur- gents became active once more, but they no longer equ- alled in number the insurgents of 1863. According to the authorities, the tsarist army, which in the rst half of 1864 had as many as 144,800 soldiers in Lithuania, was oppo- sed by just 15,000 insurgents who were, in addition, badly armed. Having an overwhelming military advantage, the tsarist authorities, with Governor General Mikhail Mura- Lithuanian vyov at the forefront, suppressed the Uprising quite easily. The participants of the Uprising and its sympathizers were Collectors not only subject to direct repression but the Russi cation policy began to be implemented as well. Coins The Uprising soon became the subject of political and historical debates. In imperial Russian tradition it was mostly named a revolt or an uprising of the Poles, and was condemned. Polish conservative social strata 50 LITAS COIN DEDICATED TO THE 150TH ANNIVERSARY also condemned the Uprising as pointless, as something which could not be and was not useful for the society in OF THE 18631864 UPRISING any way. Nevertheless, in Polish tradition, in which this Uprising is usually named the January Uprising, its glo- Silver Ag 925 ri cation as a fearless ght for liberty was entrenched. Quality proof The Uprising was also very important as a testimony of Diameter 38.61 mm the continuity of the idea of the Polish State. In Lithuanian Weight 28.28 g society, the prevailing attitude changed more than once. On the edge of the coin: LAISVĖ * LYGYBĖ * NEPRIKLAUSOMYBĖ In the late 19th– rst half of the 20th century, the events of Designed by Vidmantas Valentas and Giedrius Paulauskis 1863–1864 were named “Poletime” or the Uprising of the Mintage 3,000 Poles, the aim of which was to restore Poland (The Polish– Issued in 2013 Lithuanian Commonwealth), hence it was considered as having nothing in common with the political programme of the Lithuanians. -
Išinev Or Linkuva? Rumors and Threats Against Jews in Lithuania in 1903
Revista Română de Studii Baltice şi Nordice, Vol. 3, Issue 1 (2011): pp. 117-130. IŠINEV OR LINKUVA? RUMORS AND THREATS AGAINST K JEWS IN LITHUANIA IN 1903 Klaus Richter Technische Universität Berlin, Centre for Research on Anti-Semitism, E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Over Easter 1903, a large-scale anti-Jewish riot in Kišinev, capital of the Russian governorate of Bessarabia, left dozens of Jews dead and hundreds injured, thus leading to a massive wave of emigration. A product of social discontent and anti- Semitic agitation, the riots of Kišinev became notoriously famous as the onset of a wave of pogroms of hitherto unprecedented brutality, which only subsided after the end of the Russian Revolution of 1905/06. This article analyzes the incidents by emphasizing cultural transfers between Kišinyov and Lithuania, using the histoire croisée approach in order to provide for the different ethnic, social and political backgrounds and motivations of the actors. It also compares the disturbances in the rural north of Lithuania and in the Bessarabian industrial city of Kišinev in order to contextualize anti-Jewish violence in Lithuania on the larger scale of the Russian pogroms. When Lithuanian Jews were sometimes threatened to be killed “as in Kišinyov” and at other times to be treated “as in Linkuva”, the significance of analyzing cultural transfer while keeping the regional context in mind becomes apparent. Rezumat: În perioada Paştelui anului 1903, o revoltă antievreiască la scară largă izbucnită la Chişinău, capitala guberniei ruseşti Basarabia, lăsa în urma sa zeci de evrei morţi şi sute de răniţi, ceea ce a condus la un val masiv de emigrare. -
LITHUANIAN PAPERS No.27/2013 0 ISSN 1031-3958 Lithuanian Papers ANNUAL JOURNAL of the LITHUANIAN STUDIES SOCIETY at the UNIVERSITY of TASMANIA Volume 27 - 2013
LITHUANIAN PAPERS No.27/2013 0 ISSN 1031-3958 Lithuanian Papers ANNUAL JOURNAL OF THE LITHUANIAN STUDIES SOCIETY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA Volume 27 - 2013 EDITOR: Algimantas P.TAŠKŪ̄ NAS, OAM, PhD, MEdAdmin, BCom ASSOCIATE EDITOR: Vince J. TAŠKŪ̄ NAS, BA, MPRIA, GAICD EDITORIAL AND BUSINESS ADDRESS: Post Office Box 777, SANDY BAY, TAS. 7006 (Australia). Phone (03) 6225 2505. E-mail: [email protected] www.epaveldas.lt SUBSCRIPTIONS (from 2014): Australia, $10 p.a., posted. All other countries, US$15 p.a., by airmail. Please send all sub- scription letters to: PO Box 777, Sandy Bay, Tas. 7006, Australia. LITHUANIAN PAPERS journal is published annually by the Lithuanian Studies Society at the University of Tasmania. PRODUCED and PRINTED in Australia. CONTRIBUTIONS are usually assessed by independent referees before publication. The views expressed in this journal, unless otherwise stated, are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Editors or the publishers. Advertising The publishers of LITHUANIAN PAPERS welcome ethical advertising and reserve the right to refuse any advertisement, without having to give the reasons for such refusal. ADVERTISING RATES Size Dimensions Rate: AU$ or US$ 2 pages, mono 170 x 250 mm or 2x170x113 mm $250 or US$240 Full page mono 170 x 113 mm $140 or US$130 Half page mono 80x113mm $ 85 or US$ 80 Other sizes - by arrangement. Prices are for camera-ready copy. Typesetting and graphic design are available at extra cost. CONTACT: Al Taškūnas, Editor. Ph. (03) 6225 2505 E-mail: [email protected] LITHUANIAN PAPERS No.27/2013 1 Contents - Volume 27/2013 Lithuania's presidency of the EU Rad. -
Imperiology and Religion.Indd
9 IN SEARCH OF INTERNAL BALANCE: DEBATE ON CHANGES IN THE TERRITORIAL- ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION OF THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE IN THE 1830S AND 1840S LEONID GORIZONTOV The study of empire has become extremely popular among aca- demics over the last couple of years. Currently, the upper level of the fi eld is being built through the comparative studies of empires. The ap- pearance of the neologism “imperiology” in the name of a conference held in Sapporo in October 2004 testifi es to the fact that, at least the conference organizers, approach the topic as constituting a distinctive area of investigations. This requires that the subject’s objective limits be carefully considered, especially facing the possibility that almost every aspect of life in an empire might be labeled “imperial.” Moreover, comparativists often fall victim to hasty generalizations when they base their analysis not on historical sources (which are used merely for illustration), but instead synthesize specialist literature into more or less apt models. In creating an “empire of regions” model of pre-revolutionary Russia, the goal is not to replace theories with empiri- cal material.1 The goal is to concentrate on building explanative models more straightforwardly from concrete historical research. With this in mind, this chapter is based on archival sources. Nonetheless, its topic is not of limited, local, or insignifi cant character. There were two attempts at reform in the fi rst half of the nineteenth century that could have been of crucial importance to the administrative structuring of Russia’s imperial territory. Though the reforms were not 1 Issues that arise in the comparative study of empires are presented in the following article, prepared on the basis of presentations made in October 2003: L. -
Regions and Administrative Division in the Electronic Repository of Russian Historical Statistics
Electronic Repository of Russian Historical Statistics - RISTAT.org Regions and administrative division in the Electronic Repository of Russian Historical Statistics Author: Gijs Kessler Introduction The Electronic Repository of Russian Historical Statistics offers key indicators on the social and economic development of Russia's regions for five historical cross-sections (1795, 1858, 1897, 1959, 2002). Data are standardised to facilitate their use for cross-regional and cross- country comparisons in social and economic history research. For entirely pragmatic reasons, the Electronic Repository at this point limits itself to the regions which are part of the modern-day Russian Federation (2002 borders). However, where sources also contained data for other regions part of the Russian state at that point in time, we have also included these data as a supplement to those for the "core regions". This primarily concerns data for the cross-section 1897, often gathered and published on one programme for all of the territory of the Russian empire at the time. For those cross-sections and topics where data were procured primarily from archival sources (1795, 1858 and 1959), we largely limited ourselves to data for Russia proper, in view of the time-consuming character of archival data-mining. Changes of internal borders and administrative divisions in the course of two centuries create serious problems for historical research from a regional perspective. To start with, data should be gathered for a unified list of regions from a wide variety of sources. For those cross-sections where sources allowed us to gather all, or most required data for one single year (1858, 1897, 1959, 2002), this generally did not present problems, because all data relate to one and the same administrative division. -
Ethno-Religious Structure of the Imperial Court During the Reign of Emperor Nicholas II
RES HISTORICA 49, 2020 DOI:10.17951/rh.2020.49.359-380 Stanislav Bogdanov (Russian State Historical Archive, St. Petersburg, Russia) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9569-0037 E-mail: [email protected] Ethno-religious Structure of the Imperial Court during the Reign of Emperor Nicholas II Struktura etniczna i wyznaniowa Dworu Imperatorskiego w epoce panowania Imperatora Mikołaja II ABSTRACT The article is devoted to the national and religious structure of the Court of Emperor Nicholas II (1894–1917). Due to the peculiarities of the state system, the Institute of the Court was an integral part of the government apparatus, and its members were the most elite group of the society in the Russian Empire of the late 19th – early 20th centuries. Sum- marizing of the personal data of 2,341 courtiers, which were identified in the course of the research in the funds of the structural parts of the Ministry of the Imperial court and other state institutions and departments, made it possible to create an ethnic and religious por- trait of the ruling elite of the last Kingdom. The analysis of the processes of incorporation and ex-corporation of the members of the court staff demonstrates models of interaction between the Crown and local elites. Most of the archival materials used in the research are being put into scientific circulation for the first time. PUBLICATION INFO e-ISSN: 2449-8467 ISSN: 2082-6060 THE AUTHOR’S ADDRESS: Stanislav Bogdanov, the Russian State Historical Archive, 36 Zanevsky Prospekt, St. Petersburg 195112, Russia SOURCE OF FUNDING: Financed from the author's own funds SUBMITTED: ACCEPTED: PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2019.04.15 2020.01.15 2020.12.21 EDITORIAL WEBSITE OF THE JOURNAL: COMMITTEE E-mail: https://journals.umcs.pl/rh [email protected] 360 Stanislav Bogdanov Key words: the Russian Imperial Court, court officials, the bureaucratic elite, the Rus- sian Empire, nationality, nobility The Russian Empire entered the 20th century as a multi-ethnic country whose population differed in religion, culture, and level of social development. -
964 Copyright © 2019 by Academic Publishing House Researcher S.R.O
European Journal of Contemporary Education, 2019, 8(4) Copyright © 2019 by Academic Publishing House Researcher s.r.o. All rights reserved. Published in the Slovak Republic European Journal of Contemporary Education E-ISSN 2305-6746 2019, 8(4): 964-972 DOI: 10.13187/ejced.2019.4.964 www.ejournal1.com WARNING! Article copyright. Copying, reproduction, distribution, republication (in whole or in part), or otherwise commercial use of the violation of the author(s) rights will be pursued on the basis of international legislation. Using the hyperlinks to the article is not considered a violation of copyright. The History of the Public Education System in Vilna Governorate (the Second Half of the 19th and the Early 20th Centuries). Part 2 Olga V. Natolochnaya a , b , *, Bella A. Bulgarova c, Yulia A. Voropaeva c, Aleksandr N. Volkov d a International Network Center for Fundamental and Applied Research, Washington, USA b Volgograd State University, Volgograd, Russian Federation c RUDN University, Moscow, Russian Federation d Sochi State University, Sochi, Russian Federation Abstract This paper examines the public education system in Vilna Governorate in the period between the second half of the 19th century and the early 20th century. This part of the paper analyzes the system’s development in the period 1880–1908. In putting this work together, the authors drew upon a pool of statistical data published in Memorandum Books for Vilna Governorate in the period from 1880 to 1913, as well as an array of statistical data on the Vilna Educational District published in the scholarly journal Zhurnal Ministerstva Narodnogo Prosveshcheniya. The authors also made use of certain regulatory documents. -
19. Harald Ivanovich Hafferberg 1. Гаральд Георгий Сигизмунд Иванович Фон Гафферберг 2
112 RUSSIAN GOVERNORS IN THE KINGDOM OF POLAND (1867-1918) 19. Harald Ivanovich Hafferberg 1. Гаральд Георгий Сигизмунд Иванович фон Гафферберг 2. B. 14 March 1850 in Kursk. 3. Evangelical-Lutheran. 4. Hereditary nobleman of Livonia Governorate. 5. Imperial Alexandrovsky Lyceum, graduated 22 May 1871. 6. No reported family estate. 7. Wife: since 1878 Yekaterina Dmitriyevna Borisova, b. before 1862, d. after 1910, Orthodox, daughter of Dmitri Dmitriyevich Borisov, b. 10 March 1810, d. 1 March 1857, since 8 August 1831 cavalry officer, since 8 September 1855 major gen- eral, sister of chief of Sosnowiec branch of Warsaw Gendarmerie-Police Railroad Management; Father’s brother: Nikolay Dmitriyevich Borisov, 22 April 1833 – of- ficer; 15 May 1869 - major general, infantry of St. Petersburg Military District. 8. Children: Alexandr, b. 14 June 1879 in Mazowieck in Łomża Governorate, d. after 1909, sub-lieutenant of 7th Artillery Brigade (in Radom), lieutenant of 1st Gunner Artillery Division (in Płock); Natalya, b. 13 November 1881, married since 19 January 1903 to Vasiliy Dmitriyevich Shalimov, b. 1875, widower since 2 Oc- tober 1901 after Zinaida Nikolaevna Bantish, titular councillor, special tasks clerk with Radom Governor, land captain of the poviat of Gorbatov of Nizhny Novgorod Governorate, commissar for peasant affairs of the poviat of Nieszawa in Warsaw Governorate; Ivan, b. 30 April 1885, student of Imperial University of Warsaw. 9. Father: Ivan (Johann Theodor) Ivanovich Hafferberg, b. 27 October 1816 in Livonia Governorate, d. 8