Amazon.Com Tax Court Opinion

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Amazon.Com Tax Court Opinion 148 T.C. No. 8 UNITED STATES TAX COURT AMAZON.COM, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES, PetitionerPetitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 31197-12. Filed March 23,23, 2017.2017. In 2005 P entered into a cost sharing arrangementarrangement (CSA)(CSA) withwith S, its LuxeLuxembourgmbourg subsidiary. Pursuant toto thethe CSA,CSA, PP grantedgranted SS thethe right to use certain pre-existing intangibleintangible assetsassets inin Europe,Europe, includingincluding the intangibles required toto operateoperate PP's’s EuropeanEuropean websitewebsite business.business. This arrangement required S to mmakeake an upfront “"buybuy-in-in paypayment"ment” to compensate P for the value of the intangible assetsassets thatthat werewere toto bebe transferred to S. See sec. 1.482-7(a)(2), (g)(2), IncomeIncome TaxTax Regs.Regs. Thereafter S was required to mmakeake annual costcost sharingsharing paymentspayments toto ccompensateompensate P fforor oongoingngoing intangibleintangible developmentdevelopment costscosts (IDCs), toto the extent those IDCs benefited S.S. SeeSee id.id. paras.paras. (a)(1),(a)(1), (d)(1).(d)(1). AsAs consideration for the transfer ofof pre-existingpre-existing intangibles,intangibles, SS mmadeade aa $254.5 mmillionillion buy-inbuy-in payment to P. Applying a discounted cash-flowcash-flow (DCF) methodology toto thethe eexpectedxpected ccashash fflloowsws ffromrom tthehe EEuropeanuropean bbusiness,usiness, R R determined determined a a buy- buy- in payment of $3.6 billion, later reduced toto $3.468$3.468 billion.billion. PP con-con- tends that RR's’s DCF methodology is substantially similar toto thatthat re-re- jected by this Court in Veritas SoftwareSoftware Corp. v.v. CoCommissioner,mmissioner, 133133 - 2 - T.C. 297 (2009). P contends that RR's’s determinations areare arbitrary,arbitrary, capricious, and unreasonable andand thatthat thethe comparablecomparable uncontrolleduncontrolled transaction (CUT) method is the best mmethodethod toto calculatecalculate thethe requisiterequisite buy- buyin payment.-in payment. P used a multistep allocation system to allocate costscosts fromfrom its variousvarious ccostost centers to IDCs. See sec. 1.482-7(d)(1), IncomeIncome Tax Regs. (providing that costscosts “"mustmust be allocatedallocated betweenbetween thethe intangibleintangible development area and the other areaareass or business activitiesactivities onon aa rea-rea- sonable basis").basis”). While acceacceptingpting PP's’s allocation mmethodethod inin mmanyany re-re- spects, R determined that 100% of the costscosts capturedcaptured inin oneone importantimportant cost center (("Technology“Technology and ContentContent")”) must be allocatedallocated toto IDCs.IDCs. PP contends that RR's’s determination to allocateallocate toto IDCsIDCs 100%100% ofof thethe Technology and Content costs is inconsistentinconsistent withwith thethe regulations.regulations. 1. Held:Held: RR's’s determination with respect to the buy-inbuy-in payment isis arbitrary,arbitrary, ccapricious,apricious, aandnd uunreasonable.nreasonable. Veritas Software Corp. v. CommissionerCommissioner,, 133 T.C. 297, followed. 2. Held,Held, furtherfurther,, PP's’s CUT mmethod,ethod, with appropriate upward ad-ad- justments in numerous respects, is the best mmethodethod toto determinedetermine thethe requisite buybuy-in-in payment. 3.3. Held,Held, further,further, R abusedabused hishis discretiondiscretion in determining that 100% of Technology and Content costscosts constituteconstitute IDCs.IDCs. 4.4. Held,Held, further,further, P'sP’s costcost-allocation-allocation mmethod,ethod, with certain ad- justments, supplies a reasonable basis forfor allocatingallocating costscosts toto IDCs.IDCs. JJohnohn BB.. MMagee,agee, SSanfordanford WW.. SStark,tark, BBryonryon AA.. CChristensen,hristensen, TTraceyracey X. X. Zheng Zheng,, Robert S. KirschenbaumKirschenbaum,, Beth L. WilliamsWilliams,, John G. RyanRyan,, Saul MezeiMezei,, Julia Kazaks,Kazaks, Rajiv MadanMadan,, John A. PolitoPolito,, Michael D.D. KummerKummer,, Christopher P.P. - 3 - Murphy,Murphy, RRoyceoyce LL.. Tidwell,Tidwell, CCarlarl T.T. Ussing,Ussing, HansHans D.D. Gerling-Ritters,Gerling-Ritters, Nicholas A. Zemil,Zemil, and Paul M. McLaughlinMcLaughlin,, for petitioner. Jill A. FrischFrisch,, Anne OO'Brien’Brien HintermeisterHintermeister,, Melissa D. LangLang,, LloydLloyd T. SilberzweigSilberzweig,, Shannon L. CohenCohen,, Melissa L.L. HiltyHilty,, ScottScott W.W. MentinkMentink,, DavidDavid A.A. LeeLee,, My V. Vo,Vo, Jimeel R. Hamud,Hamud, Aaron T. Vaughan,Vaughan, and Mary E. WynneWynne,, for respondent. CONTENTS FINDINGSFINDINGS OOFF FFACTACT. 10 I. Overview of AmazonAmazon's’s European Business . 12 A. Initial Expansion Into Europe . 12 B. Original Structure of European Business . 1166 C. "Project“Project GGoldcrest"oldcrest” . .202 . 0 1.1. Cost Sharing Arrangement . 23 2.2. LLicenseicense Agreement . 24 3.3. AssignmentAssignment Agreement . 24 4.4. European Subsidiary Contribution . 25 55.. European Business Contribution . 25 6.6. FourFour--PartyParty Agreement . 26 D. Life After Project Goldcrest . 26 II. Retail and Technological Environment . 28 A. Internet Retail Environment . 28 B. Evolution of AmazonAmazon's’s Website Architecture . 32 C. Evolution of AmazonAmazon's’s Software Applications . 38 1.1. CCustomerustomer Master Service . 38 2.2. OOrderrder Master Service . 39 3.3. DDynamoynamo . 40 4.4. PPaymentsayments . 41 55.. IItemtem MMasteraster . 42 - 4 - 6.6. Personalization . 43 77.. MMessagingessaging . 45 D. New Products and Services After JanuaryJanuary 1, 2005 . 46 III. Amazon'sAmazon’s ThirdThird-Party-Party Businesses . 47 A. Merchants.comMerchants.com . 47 B. Associates and Syndicated Stores . 49 IV.W. TheThe BBuyuy--InIn PPaymentayment . 51 V. Cost Sharing PayPaymentsments . 57 VI. Stock-BasedStock-Based Compensation . 65 OOPINIONPINION . 67 I. Cost Sharing Background . 69 II. RespondentRespondent's’s Determination of the Buy-InBuy-In PaymentPayment . 7373 III. PetitionerPetitioner's’s Determination of the Buy-InBuy-In PaymentPayment . 89 A. WebsiteWebsite Technology . 91 1.1. RRoyaltyoyalty RRateate . 95 2.2. Useful Life and Decay Curve . 102 a. UsefulUseful LLifeife . 103 b.b. DecayDecay CCurveurve . 107 c. "Tail"“Tail” PPerioderiod . 1117 17 3.3. RRevenueevenue Base . 121 4.4. DDiscountiscount Rate . 124 B. Marketing Intangibles . 127 1.1. RRoyaltyoyalty RRateate . 129 2.2. UsefulUseful LLifeife . 135 3.3. RRevenueevenue Base . 143 4.4. DDiscountiscount Rate . 146 55.. European Portfolio . 147 a. Ownership of the European Portfolio . 148148 b.b. Allocating Value to the European PortfolioPortfolio . 154154 - 5 - C. CCustomerustomer Information . 162 IV.W. CCostost Sharing PayPaymentsments . 173 A. RespondentRespondent's’s Position . 174 B. PetitionerPetitioner's’s Position . 178 C. Stock-BasedStock-Based Compensation . 185 LAUBER, Judge:Judge: The Internal Revenue ServiceService (IRS oorr respondent)respondent) deter-deter- mined, for 2005 and 2006 respectively, deficienciesdeficiencies inin petitionerpetitioner's’s FederalFederal incomeincome tax of $8,380,790 and $225,653,149.$225,653,149.11 TheseThese deficienciesdeficiencies arosearose frofromm aa seriesseries ofof transactions by which AAmazon.com,mazon.com, Inc., and its dodomesticmestic subsidiariessubsidiaries (collective-(collective- ly, AmazonAmazon US) transferred to Amazon Europe Holding TechnologiesTechnologies SCSSCS (AEHT), a Luxembourg subsidiary, the intangible assets requiredrequired toto operateoperate pe-pe- titioner'stitioner’s European website business. InvokingInvoking sectionsection 482,482, thethe IRSIRS mademade substantial transfer-pricingtransfer-pricing adjustmentsadjustments reallocatingreallocating incomeincome toto AAmazonmazon USUS fromfrom AEHT. From its inception through 2005 AAmazonmazon USUS ownedowned thethe intellectualintellectual prop-prop- erty in question. In 2004 AAmazonmazon US andand AEHTAEHT enteredentered intointo aa “"costcost sharingsharing 1lUnless otherwise indicated, allall statutorystatutory referereferencesnces areare toto thethe InternalInternal Revenue Code in effect for the tax years at issue,issue, andand allall RuleRule referereferencesnces areare toto thethe Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. WeWe roundround allall dollardollar amountsamounts toto thethe nearest dollar. - 6 - arrangement."arrangement.” See sec. 1.482-7(a)(1), (b)(1), IncomeIncome Tax Regs.Regs.22 This arrange- ment required AEHT to make an up-frontup-front "buy“buy-in-in paymentpayment"” to compensate Ama- zon US for the value of the intangible assetsassets thatthat werewere toto bebe transferredtransferred toto AEHT.AEHT. See id. paras. (a)(2), (g)(2). Thereafter AEHT was required to mmakeake annualannual costcost sharing payments to compensate Amazon US for ongoing intangibleintangible developmentdevelopment costs (IDCs), to the extent those IDCsIDCs benefited AEHT.AEHT. In a series of transactions inin 2005 andand 20062006 AAmazonmazon USUS transferredtransferred toto AEHT three groups of intangible assets: (1)(1) thethe softwaresoftware andand otherother technologytechnology re-re- quired to operate petitionerpetitioner's’s EuropeanEuropean websites,websites, fulfillmentfulfillment centers,centers, andand relatedrelated business activities; (2)(2) mmarketingarketing intangibles,intangibles, includingincluding trademarks,trademarks, tradenames,tradenames, and domain names relevant to the European business; andand (3)(3) customercustomer listslists andand other information relating
Recommended publications
  • Boost Application Development with Amazon Web Services, Part 1: How to Use the Amazon E-Commerce Service Skill Level: Intermediate
    Boost application development with Amazon Web Services, Part 1: How to use the Amazon E-Commerce Service Skill Level: Intermediate Eric Giguerre ([email protected]) Software Developer Studio B 24 Jun 2005 This tutorial provides an overview of Amazon Web Services (AWS). AWS exposes raw product information and key parts of Amazon.com technology to third-party developers for use in their applications. After describing how AWS works in general, the tutorial focuses on the main AWS service, called the Amazon E-Commerce Service (ECS). As part of this tutorial, you will develop a small Web application that uses ECS to display book and music information. Section 1. Before you start About this tutorial This tutorial provides an overview of Amazon Web Services (AWS). AWS exposes raw product information and key parts of Amazon.com technology to third-party developers for use in their applications. After describing how AWS works in general, the tutorial focuses on the main AWS service, called the Amazon E-Commerce Service (ECS). As part of this tutorial, you will develop a small Web application that uses ECS to display book and music information. This tutorial is written primarily for Java(TM); developers who are looking to incorporate AWS into their applications or to build new applications around AWS, though much of the material isn't specific to the Java programming language. No How to use the Amazon E-Commerce Service © Copyright IBM Corporation 1994, 2008. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 37 developerWorks® ibm.com/developerWorks knowledge of Web services is required. Prerequisites As part of this tutorial, you need to register with Amazon.com to obtain an AWS subscription ID.
    [Show full text]
  • AMAZON.COM, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 or ¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to . Commission File No. 000-22513 AMAZON.COM, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 91-1646860 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 410 Terry Avenue North Seattle, Washington 98109-5210 (206) 266-1000 (Address and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered Common Stock, par value $.01 per share Nasdaq Global Select Market Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No ¨ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ¨ No x Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • The Amazon Community Because Members Are Able to Rate All Outside Sellers and Their Products
    CASE #1- AMAZON.COM- A BUSINESS HISTORY1 TO APPEAR IN-“E-COMMERCE MANAGEMENT: TEXT AND CASES” BY SANDEEP KRISHNAMURTHY([email protected]) (LAST UPDATED ON MARCH 12, 2002) Introduction In many ways, Amazon.com is perhaps the company that is most closely tied with the E-Commerce phenomenon. The Seattle, WA based company has grown from a book seller to a virtual Wal-Mart of the Web selling products as diverse as Music CDs, Cookware, Toys and Games and Tools and Hardware. The company has also grown at a tremendous rate with revenues rising from about $150 million in 1997 to $3.1 billion in 2001. However, the rise in revenue has led to a commensurate increase in operating losses leaving the company with a large deficit. The company did make its first quarterly profit of $5.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2001. But, this was dwarfed by large cumulative losses. Its share price, as shown in Figure 1, is perhaps the biggest symbol of the rise and fall of the dot-coms. [Insert Figure 1 About Here.] The purpose of this case is to present a balanced and up-to-date business history of the company. Background The story of the formation of Amazon.com is often repeated and is now an urban legend. The company was founded by Jeff Bezos, a computer science and electrical engineering graduate from Princeton University. Bezos had moved to Seattle after resigning as the senior vice-president at D.E.Shaw, a Wall Street investment bank. He did not know much about the Internet.
    [Show full text]
  • Running Head: Amazon
    Amazon, Inc. 1 Running head: Amazon.com, Inc. Amazon.com, Inc. New Mexico Highlands University BUS 696, Business Case Study Dr. Margaret Young March 21, 2009 Amazon, Inc. 2 What does a customer centric company look like? Is there a smiling face to welcome you in the door? What if the company doesn’t have a door? What if the door was the World Wide Web? Then what does a customer centric online company look like? Is there a big smiling face when you browse to the company’s website? The answer is yes and the company is Amazon.com, Inc. Amazon.com, Inc. Amazon.com, Inc. is the largest “e-tailer” in the world with annual sales in 2008 over $19 billion (Amazon.com, Inc., 2009). Amazon.com, Inc. was founded by Jeff Bezos in 1994 in Washington State. Amazon.com, Inc. opened its virtual doors in July of 1995 with Amazon.com (Amazon.com, Inc., 2008). Amazon.com was originally an online bookstore. The company sold its first book in July of 1995. The book was titled, "Fluid Concepts & Creative Analogies: Computer Models of the Fundamental Mechanisms of Thought" (Amazon.com, Inc., 2008) In May of 1997 Amazon.com, Inc. launched its initial public offering (IPO) of stock. The company sold three million shares of common stock. The company was listed as AMZN on the NASDAQ (Schneider, 2008, para. 1). Amazon.com Product Offerings Soon after the company's IPO, Amazon.com, Inc. began selling music, movies, software, electronics, and other items besides books on its website (Schneider, 2008, para.
    [Show full text]
  • Amazon Kindle to Our Customers
    To our shareowners: November 19, 2007, was a special day. After three years of work, we introduced Amazon Kindle to our customers. Many of you may already know something of Kindle—we’re fortunate (and grateful) that it has been broadly written and talked about. Briefly, Kindle is a purpose-built reading device with wireless access to more than 110,000 books, blogs, magazines, and newspapers. The wireless connectivity isn’t WiFi—instead it uses the same wireless network as advanced cell phones, which means it works when you’re at home in bed or out and moving around. You can buy a book directly from the device, and the whole book will be downloaded wirelessly, ready for reading, in less than 60 seconds. There is no “wireless plan,” no year-long contract you must commit to, and no monthly service fee. It has a paper-like electronic-ink display that’s easy to read even in bright daylight. Folks who see the display for the first time do a double-take. It’s thinner and lighter than a paperback, and can hold 200 books. Take a look at the Kindle detail page on Amazon.com to see what customers think—Kindle has already been reviewed more than 2,000 times. As you might expect after three years of work, we had sincere hopes that Kindle would be well received, but we did not expect the level of demand that actually materialized. We sold out in the first 5 1⁄2 hours, and our supply chain and manufacturing teams have had to scramble to increase production capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Competing in the Age of Ai
    COMPETING IN THE AGE OF AI STRATEGY AND LEADERSHIP WHEN ALGORITHMS AND NETWORKS RUN THE WORLD BY MARCO IANTISI AND KARIM R. LAKHANI Contents FIGURE 1-1 The Next Rembrandt 3 FIGURE 1-2 The Collision Between Traditional and Digital 3 Operating Models FIGURE 2-1 Alignment Between A Company’s Business 4 Model and Operating Model FIGURE 2-2 Value Creation and Capture Versus Value 4 Delivery FIGURE 3-1 The AI Factory’s Virtuous Cycle 5 FIGURE 3-2 AI Factory Components 5 FIGURE 3-3 A State-of-The-Art Data Platform 6 FIGURE 3-4 Results of LISH Analysis Contest Using Data 7 from The Dana-Farber Cancer Institute FIGURE 4-1 Siloed Architecture 8 FIGURE 4-2 A Traditional Organization’s Ability to Deliver 8 Value Faces A Curve of Diminishing Returns FIGURE 4-3 An Amazon Timeline 9 FIGURE 4-4 Operating Architecture for an AI-Powered Firm 9 TABLE 5-1 Financial Performance of AI Maturity Index 10 Leaders and Laggards FIGURE 5-1 Four Stages of Digital Operating Model 11 Transformation FIGURE 6-1 The Value of Network and Learning Effects 12 FIGURE 6-2 Network-Based Value Creation for A Disease 13 Management App FIGURE 6-3 Impact of Dataset Scale on Performance 14 FIGURE 6-4 The Difference Between Local (Left) And 14 Global Networks FIGURE 6-5 Networks Connected to Uber’s Core Business 15 TABLE 6-1 Evaluating Uber’s Strategic Networks 15 FIGURE 6-6 Mapping Uber’s Value Creation and Capture 16 Opportunities FIGURE 7-1 The Collision Between A Digital and A 16 Traditional Firm FIGURE 7-2 The Nokia And Apple Value Curves 17 FIGURE 7-3 The Evolution of The Modern Economy 18 Notes 19 FIGURE 1-1 The next Rembrandt Source: reproduced by permission of ING and J.
    [Show full text]
  • Amazon Comes from the Desire to Impress Customers Rather Than the Zeal to Best Competitors
    To our shareowners: As regular readers of this letter will know, our energy at Amazon comes from the desire to impress customers rather than the zeal to best competitors. We don’t take a view on which of these approaches is more likely to maximize business success. There are pros and cons to both and many examples of highly successful competitor-focused companies. We do work to pay attention to competitors and be inspired by them, but it is a fact that the customer-centric way is at this point a defining element of our culture. One advantage – perhaps a somewhat subtle one – of a customer-driven focus is that it aids a certain type of proactivity. When we’re at our best, we don’t wait for external pressures. We are internally driven to improve our services, adding benefits and features, before we have to. We lower prices and increase value for customers before we have to. We invent before we have to. These investments are motivated by customer focus rather than by reaction to competition. We think this approach earns more trust with customers and drives rapid improvements in customer experience – importantly – even in those areas where we are already the leader. “Thank you. Every time I see that white paper on the front page of Amazon, I know that I’m about to get more for my money than I thought I would. I signed up for Prime for the shipping, yet now I get movies, and TV and books. You keep adding more, but not charging more.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C
    To our shareowners: Random forests, naïve Bayesian estimators, RESTful services, gossip protocols, eventual consistency, data sharding, anti-entropy, Byzantine quorum, erasure coding, vector clocks … walk into certain Amazon meetings, and you may momentarily think you’ve stumbled into a computer science lecture. Look inside a current textbook on software architecture, and you’ll find few patterns that we don’t apply at Amazon. We use high-performance transactions systems, complex rendering and object caching, workflow and queuing systems, business intelligence and data analytics, machine learning and pattern recognition, neural networks and probabilistic decision making, and a wide variety of other techniques. And while many of our systems are based on the latest in computer science research, this often hasn’t been sufficient: our architects and engineers have had to advance research in directions that no academic had yet taken. Many of the problems we face have no textbook solutions, and so we -- happily -- invent new approaches. Our technologies are almost exclusively implemented as services: bits of logic that encapsulate the data they operate on and provide hardened interfaces as the only way to access their functionality. This approach reduces side effects and allows services to evolve at their own pace without impacting the other components of the overall system. Service-oriented architecture -- or SOA -- is the fundamental building abstraction for Amazon technologies. Thanks to a thoughtful and far-sighted team of engineers and architects, this approach was applied at Amazon long before SOA became a buzzword in the industry. Our e-commerce platform is composed of a federation of hundreds of software services that work in concert to deliver functionality ranging from recommendations to order fulfillment to inventory tracking.
    [Show full text]
  • Silver Gelatin: a User's Guide to Liquid Photographic Emulsions: Amazon.Co.Uk: Martin Reed, Sarah Jones: 9781902538150: Books 02/10/2016 19:44
    Silver Gelatin: A User's Guide to Liquid Photographic Emulsions: Amazon.co.uk: Martin Reed, Sarah Jones: 9781902538150: Books 02/10/2016 19:44 Books Try Prime Shop by Hello, A Try Your 0 Department A's Amazon Today's Deals Gift Cards & Top Up Sell Your Account Prime Lists Basket Books Advanced Search Best Sellers Top New Releases Deals in Books School Books Textbooks Books Outlet Children's Books Calendars & Diaries Art, Architecture & Photography › Photography › Techniques & Tools Silver Gelatin: A User's Guide to Share Liquid Photographic Emulsions 4 Used from £33.97 Paperback – 25 Oct 2001 by Martin Reed (Author), Sarah Jones (Author) See All Buying Options 6 customer reviews See all formats and editions Add to List Paperback from £33.97 Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon 4 Used from £33.97 Liquid photographic emulsion offers photographers and artists working with photography the freedom to produce images on the material of their choice. Silver Gelatin is a practical art book designed to comprehensively illustrate the use of liquid photographic emulsion and is split into two clearly defined sections. The first section features the work of top photographers and artists such as David Sheinmann, Chris Nash, Lana Wong, Melanie Manchot, See this image Jennifer Bates, Gary Kirkham and Jane Quinn. The secondRead moresection is a clear and concise technical guide, taking the reader through all the necessary background Special Offers and Product Promotions Customers Viewing This Page May Be Interested In These Sponsored Links (What is this?) Smoke, liquid photography Leading London specialist studio. Covent Garden. Famous clients www.packshotfactory.co.uk/ PR Photography - TNR Half price consultation and half recce’s for summer! (ends 29 Sep) www.wearetnr.com/broadcast-services Silver Emulsion Get Silver Emulsion Info From 6 Search Engines at Once.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan State University College of Engineering Fall 2018
    MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING FALL 2018 Executive Partner Sponsor On behalf of the entire Meijer family and the College of Engineering at Michigan State University, we welcome you to the 25th Annual Design Day. Today represents the culmination of countless hours of collaboration, diligence and creative ingenuity. Meijer is proud to be the Executive Sponsor of this extraordinary program that showcases the talents of MSU’s engineering students, who will one day help shape the communities in which we live and the businesses in which we work. At Meijer, we applaud outside-the-box thinking because our history is rich with innovation and risk. During the Great Depression, our founders took a chance and opened a small grocery store – not unlike many other entrepreneurs. But they set themselves apart from the competition with a focus on their customers and an eye for innovation: shopping carts in 1938, automated conveyer belts in 1954, and the one-stop shopping concept in 1962 that has grown into a retail phenomenon. As the digital landscape continues to change, so will the importance of understanding science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Meijer is pleased to support the emerging leaders within the MSU College of Engineering and are excited for all of you – family, friends and faculty – to see what we see in this impressive group. Congratulations to everyone who helped make this year’s Design Day a success, especially the students who’ve worked so hard. Happy 25th Anniversary from Meijer and Go Green! Sincerely, Terry Ledbetter — Meijer Chief Information Officer 1018.294301-876806.LL Table of Contents: December 7, 2018 Welcome from our Executive Partner Sponsor: Meijer .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • View Annual Report
    To our shareowners: The financial results for 2009 reflect the cumulative effect of 15 years of customer experience improvements: increasing selection, speeding delivery, reducing cost structure so we can afford to offer customers ever-lower prices, and many others. This work has been done by a large number of smart, relentless, customer-devoted people across all areas of the company. We are proud of our low prices, our reliable delivery, and our in-stock position on even obscure and hard-to-find items. We also know that we can still be much better, and we’re dedicated to improving further. Some notable highlights from 2009: • Net sales increased 28% year-over-year to $24.51 billion in 2009. This is 15 times higher than net sales 10 years ago when they were $1.64 billion in 1999. • Free cash flow increased 114% year-over-year to $2.92 billion in 2009. • More customers are taking advantage of Amazon Prime, with worldwide memberships up significantly over last year. The number of different items available for immediate shipment grew more than 50% in 2009. • We added 21 new product categories around the world in 2009, including Automotive in Japan, Baby in France, and Shoes and Apparel in China. • It was a busy year for our shoes business. In November we acquired Zappos, a leader in online apparel and footwear sales that strives to provide shoppers with the best possible service and selection. Zappos is a terrific addition to our Endless, Javari, Amazon, and Shopbop selection. • The apparel team continued to enhance customer experience with the launch of our Denim Shop offering 100 brands, including Joe’s Jeans, Lucky Brand, 7 For All Mankind, and Levi’s.
    [Show full text]
  • IRS Trial Memorandum
    u~ 11"\.A vvun.• FILED ALS SEATTLE DEC 15 2014 AMAZON. COM, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES Petitioner( s) PAPER FILED V. Docket No. 31197-12 COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent TRIAL MEMORANDUM SERVED Apr 07 2015 Protected Information Subject to Protective Order UNITED STATES TAX COURT AMAZON.COM, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Docket No. 31197-12 ) COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ). Judge Lauber ) ) Respondent. ) RESPONDENT'S TRIAL MEMORANDUM ISSUES FOR TRIAL 1. Whether respondent's determination that $3.6 billion is an arm's length price for the intangible property used in petitioner's European websites business that petitioner transferred or made available to its newly formed Luxembourg subsidiary in 2005 is arbitrary and capricious. 1 2. Whether respondent's determination that petitioner omitted costs related to intangible development under its qualified cost sharing arrangement {"QCSA") in computing the cost sharing payments due from the Luxembourg subsidiary in the amounts of $23,032,018 and $109,889,346 in 2005 and 2006, respectively, is arbitrary and capricious and whether petitioner's claim to reduce the 2005 cost sharing payment by $59,752,000 should be denied. 1 Petitioner reported compensation for the transfer over a seven year period. Respondent's adjustments for the 2005 and 2006 tax years are $1,036,305,000 and $1,170,251,000, respectively. Docket No; 31197~12 3. Whether petitioner's claim to reduce its 2005 and 2006 cost sharing payments from its Luxembourg subsidiary in the amounts of $2,545,000 and $6,951,000, respectively, by excluding stock-based compensation ("SBC") related to intangible development.
    [Show full text]