FINAL Environmental Impact Report Volume III-Response to Comments
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
FINAL Environmental Impact Report Volume III-Response to Comments SCH# 2019060254 October 2020 This page intentionally left blank Del Puerto Canyon Reservoir Final Environmental Impact Report Volume III-Responses to Comments SCH# 2019060254 Prepared for: Del Puerto Water District 17840 Ward Avenue/P.O. Box 1596 Patterson, CA 95363 Prepared by: Woodard & Curran 2175 North California Boulevard, Suite 315 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 October 2020 Del Puerto Canyon Reservoir Final EIR This page intentionally left blank October 2020 Del Puerto Canyon Reservoir Final EIR Table of Contents Volume III Table of Contents Chapter 8 Introduction to Final EIR .....................................................................................8-1 8.1 Project Background ...............................................................................................8-1 8.2 Draft EIR Public Review Process ...........................................................................8-1 8.3 Purpose of the Final EIR ........................................................................................8-1 8.4 CEQA Requirements .............................................................................................8-1 8.5 Consideration of Recirculation ...............................................................................8-2 8.6 Requirements for Certification and Future Steps in Project Approval .....................8-2 8.7 Organization of this Document ...............................................................................8-2 8.8 Use of Comment Summaries .................................................................................8-3 8.9 Comments Received on the Draft EIR ...................................................................8-3 Chapter 9 Response to Comments ......................................................................................9-1 9.0 Master Responses .................................................................................................9-1 9.0.1 Master Response 1 – Project Partners are Public Agencies ................................................ 9-1 9.0.2 Master Response 2 – Project Opposition.............................................................................. 9-1 9.0.3 Master Response 3 – Petitions ............................................................................................. 9-2 9.0.4 Master Response 4 – Alternatives including Alternative Location ........................................ 9-2 9.0.5 Master Response 5 – Groundwater Storage Alternative .................................................... 9-11 9.0.6 Master Response 6 – Seismic Risk and Dam Safety ......................................................... 9-13 9.0.7 Master Response 7 – Risk of Landslides ............................................................................ 9-15 9.0.8 Master Response 8 – Potential Inundation in the Event of Dam Failure ............................ 9-18 9.0.9 Master Response 9 – Emergency Action Plan ................................................................... 9-21 9.0.10 Master Response 10 – Need for Flood Insurance and Hazard Disclosure......................... 9-25 9.0.11 Master Response 11 – Risk of Reservoir Triggered Seismicity .......................................... 9-28 9.0.12 Master Response 12 – City of Patterson is Not a Responsible or Trustee Agency ........... 9-29 9.0.13 Master Response 13 – Consistency with City of Patterson General Plan .......................... 9-30 9.0.14 Master Response 14 – Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases and their Health Effects ........ 9-30 9.0.15 Master Response 15 – Impacts on Recreation in Del Puerto Canyon ............................... 9-33 9.0.16 Master Response 16 – Geology of Del Puerto Canyon ...................................................... 9-34 9.0.17 Master Response 17 – Paleontology .................................................................................. 9-34 9.0.18 Master Response 18 – Native American Coordination Regarding Sites in Del Puerto Canyon .............................................................................................................. 9-35 9.0.19 Master Response 19 – Mitigation for Biological Resources................................................ 9-36 9.0.20 Master Response 20 – Notification and Public Information ................................................ 9-37 9.0.21 Master Response 21 – Project Funding .............................................................................. 9-39 9.1 Comment Letter 1 - United States Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, J. David Wiens, Ph.D., Supervisory Research Wildlife Biologist ............. 9-41 9.2 Comment Letter 2 - State of California Department of Toxic Substances Control, Gavin McCreary, Project Manager, Site Evaluation and Remediation Unit ..................................................................9- 42 9.3 Comment Letter 3 - State of California Department of Water Resources, Anna Fock, Supervising Engineer ........................................................................9- 43 9.4 Comment Letter 4 - State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Water Rights, Diane Riddle, Assistant Deputy Director ........................................9- 44 9.5 Comment Letter 5 - State of California, Department of Fish and Wildlife, Julie A. Vance, Regional Manager, Central Region .............................................9- 49 9.6 Comment Letter 6 - State of California, Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, State Clearinghouse, Scott Morgan, Director ...............................9- 58 9.7 Comment Letter 7 - City of Patterson, submitted through Churchwell White LLP, Douglas White ................................................................9- 59 October 2020 i Del Puerto Canyon Reservoir Final EIR Table of Contents Volume III 9.8 Comment Letter 8 - Stanislaus County Environmental Review Committee, Patrick Cavanah ..................................................................................................9- 61 9.9 Comment Letter 9 - Mount Diablo Audubon Society, Nancy H. Wenninger, Chair .................................................................................9- 62 9.10 Comment Letter 10 - Comment Letter 4 - Stanislaus Audubon Society, David Froba, Treasurer........................................................................................9- 63 9.11 Comment Letter 11 - California Native Plant Society, Nick Jensen, Conservation Scientist .........................................................................................9- 63 9.12 Comment Letter 12 - Friends of the River, Sierra Club Motherlode Chapter, Save Del Puerto Canyon, Environmental Water Caucus Southern California Watershed Alliance, California Sportfishing Protection Alliance, California Water Impact Network, The Fly Fishers of Davis, Save California Salmon, California Water Research ...................................................................................9- 75 9.13 Comment Letter 13 - East Bay Regional Park District, Douglas A. Bell, Wildlife Program Manager ...................................................................................9- 90 9.14 Comment Letter 14 - Valley Land Alliance, submitted through Marsha A. Burch, Attorney at Law .......................................................................9- 92 9.15 Comment Letter 15 - Save Mount Diablo, Juan Pablo Galván, Senior Land Use Manager ...................................................................................9- 96 9.16 Comment Letter 16 - Isabel Garcia ....................................................................9- 101 9.17 Comment Letter 17 - Adriane Sabori-Lopez .......................................................9- 101 9.18 Comment Letter 18 - Adriane Sabori-Lopez (second comment submittal) ......... 9-101 9.19 Comment Letter 19 - Erlinda Torres (Perez) ...................................................... 9-102 9.20 Comment Letter 20 - Jane Fawke ......................................................................9- 102 9.21 Comment Letter 21 - Jacinto Cantu ................................................................... 9-102 9.22 Comment Letter 22 - Donald Hess ....................................................................9- 103 9.23 Comment Letter 23 - M. Cross ...........................................................................9- 103 9.24 Comment Letter 24 - Nicole Angeles ................................................................. 9-104 9.25 Comment Letter 25 - Jeremy and Nicole Angeles .............................................. 9-105 9.26 Comment Letter 26 - Susan Clark .....................................................................9- 105 9.27 Comment Letter 27 - Eric Mello .........................................................................9- 106 9.28 Comment Letter 28 - Genevieve ........................................................................9- 107 9.29 Comment Letter 29 - Bernardino and Rita Gill ................................................... 9-107 9.30 Comment Letter 30 - Kandace Kiser ..................................................................9- 107 9.31 Comment Letter 31 - John Chamorro ................................................................9- 108 9.32 Comment Letter 32 - Jazmin Ortega ..................................................................9- 108 9.33 Comment Letter 33 - Benjamin Sierra ................................................................9- 108 9.34 Comment Letter 34 -