DOCSLIB.ORG

Enquest Heather Limited Galia Field Development Environmental Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Enquest Heather Limited Galia Field Development Environmental Statement EnQuest Heather Limited Galia Field Development Environmental Statement DECC Document Ref: D/4127/2011 EnQuest Heather Limited Document Ref: TBC ISSUED: 02 MAY 2012 ENQUEST HEATHER LIMITED GALIA FIELD DEVELOPMENT STANDARD INFORMATION SHEET Project Name Galia Field Development DECC Reference D/4127/2011 Number Type of Project Small oil field development Undertaker Name EnQuest Heather Limited Undertaker 5 Floor Consort House, Stell Road, Aberdeen, AB11 5QF, United Kingdom Address Licencees / EnQuest Heather Limited (100%) Owners EnQuest Heather Limited wishes to redevelop the Duncan field in UK continental shelf (UKCS) Block 30/24 in the Central North Sea (CNS). The field, to be renamed Galia, will consist of one production well tied-back via a new oil production flowline to the Alma production manifold. Which is turn is tied-back to the EnQuest Producer (formerly known as the Uisge Gorm) floating production, offloading and storage facility (FPSO). This ES covers the drilling of a single production well, installation of a short tie back to the Alma production manifold and subsequent production via the FPSO. The well will be drilled using a combination of water and oil based muds. Cuttings and water based muds will be discharged to sea both at the seabed and from the drilling rig to the sea surface. Oil based mud and cuttings will not be discharged and will be skipped and shipped back to shore for disposal. The flowline, umbilical and power cable will be trenched between the well and the Alma production manifold. Concrete mattresses will be used for protection. There will Short Description be no rock dumping at Galia. Produced crude will be collected from the FPSO by shuttle tanker once every two weeks. The majority of the produced gas will be used for power generation, however there will be a period during the early part of field life where excess gas is produced that cannot be burned, this will be flared. Under normal conditions there will be no overboard discharge and as noted above, water quality could only be affected during occasional outage of the PWRI onboard the FPSO or as a result of production (from all wells) starting prior to the commissioning of the injection wells. Current estimates are that, based on a 10 year field life, the base case recovery from the Galia field will be 1.144 million tonnes (1.37 million m3) with a high recovery case of 1.42 million tonnes (1.7 million m3). Dual electrical submersible pumps (ESP) will be utilised at Galia to maximise production. Construction is scheduled to start in September 2012. First oil is anticipated in October 2013. Anticipated Start September 2012 of Works Previous / Other Statements Alma Field Development Environmental Statement (D/4110/2011) Related to this Project REPORT REFERENCE: GALIA ES D-4127-2011.DOCX 02/05/2012 ENQUEST HEATHER LIMITED GALIA FIELD DEVELOPMENT EnQuest is aiming to limit environmental effects to low impact through project design, mitigation measures and operational controls. No impacts associated with the development have been categorised as Major or Critical, meaning that the majority of the impacts were assessed as having no or minor residual impact (i.e., impacts can be managed through effective standard operating procedures). During construction and production it is considered that the following activities may Significant have an impact: on the environment: atmospheric emissions; anchoring of the drilling Environmental rig; discharge of chemicals and drill cuttings; positioning of the well head, trenching; Impacts Identified concrete mattressing on the seabed; and the accidental spill of hydrocarbons and/or chemicals. However in all instances the severity of the impact is limited by the nature and composition of the environment and by the fact that these activities are short-term and affect a localised area. With mitigation measures in place, the Galia field development will have a minor impact on the environment. Statement Intertek METOC and EnQuest Heather Limited Prepared By REPORT REFERENCE: GALIA ES D-4127-2011.DOCX 02/05/2012 ENQUEST HEATHER LIMITED GALIA FIELD DEVELOPMENT NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY INTRODUCTION EnQuest Heather Limited is an independent oil and gas development and production company and operator of the Galia field in the UK Central North Sea (CNS), located in UKCS Block 30/24 in a water depth of approximately 80m. EnQuest Heather Limited plans to develop the Galia field through a single production well tied-back via a new production flowline, umbilical and power cable to the nearby Alma production centre, which is in turn tied back to the EnQuest Producer floating production, storage and offloading facility (FPSO). Oil production will be via the FPSO and export through the use of a shuttle tanker. In compliance with regulatory requirements, and to responsibly manage any impacts from the development, EnQuest has carried out an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of the proposed development. The EIA process establishes the environmental baseline in the area of the proposed development and identifies environmental sensitivities, particularly with relevance to the concerns of stakeholders and regulatory bodies. It also evaluates relevant environmental impacts and their significance, and finally proposes mitigation measures which the operator will implement to minimise these impacts. This document reports on the EIA process, its findings and conclusions. GOVERNING LEGISLATION Offshore oil and gas developments are governed by a framework of International, European Community (EU) and UK laws, policies and guidelines. These dictate the management goals and objectives which an environmental assessment may aim to achieve. The main UK regulations that apply to the project are: Petroleum Act 1998 – Requires all offshore oil and gas development to apply for consent to undertake the project. Offshore Petroleum Production and Pipelines (Assessment of Environmental Effects) (Amendment) Regulations 2007 – These regulations implement the European Commission (EC) EIA Directive (97/11/EC) and Public Participation Directive (2003/35/EC), and require an Environmental Statement (ES) to be submitted for offshore oil and gas projects and public participation in the consent process. Offshore Marine Conservation (Natural Habitats, &c.) Regulations 2007 (as amended in 2009 and 2010) – These regulations implement in the UK the EC Habitats REPORT REF: GALIA ES D/4127/2011 02/05/2012 ENQUEST HEATHER LIMITED GALIA FIELD DEVELOPMENT Directive (92/43/EC) and the EC Birds Directive (79/409/EC) and aim to protect marine species and wild birds from environmentally damaging activities. It is now an offence under the Regulations to physically injure or deliberately disturb wild animals of a European Protected Species. Offshore Petroleum Activities (Conservation of Habitats) Regulations 2001 (amended in 2007) – The regulations apply the EC Habitats and EC Birds Directives in relation to oil and gas projects on the UKCS. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Three quarters of the UK’s current primary energy is met by oil and gas. In 2010, oil produced on the UKCS satisfied 87% of domestic demand. In 2020, it is estimated that 70% of primary energy consumed in the UK will still come from oil and gas, even upon the achievement of the Government’s target to source 15% of energy from renewable sources. If investment is sustained, the UKCS has the potential to satisfy around 60% of the UK’s oil and gas demand in 2020 (OGUK 2011). In 2000, the UK Government identified the need to stimulate oil and gas investment and activity to ensure that indigenous production of oil and gas remained at significant levels into the future. The Promote UK campaign is designed to attract new entrants onto the UKCS, and focused on: Independent oil companies with the resources to drill wildcat exploration wells and exploit the full value chain from exploration to development; and Niche ‘developers’, particularly those with the skills to develop previously undeveloped discoveries by using technically innovative and best cost solutions (DECC 2011a). As a result of these initiatives, EnQuest has been active on the UKCS since 2010. It specialises in predominantly mature areas of the NNS and CNS, aiming to maximise the potential from existing fields and future developments in the UKCS. The longer term strategy is to become a prominent exploration and development operator. The Galia Field development is part of this strategy and fits many of the UK energy policy objectives: It is an economically viable development that has been designed to maximise reserve recovery within an existing mature province using best cost solutions It is a national resource that will help to contribute towards energy security PROJECT ALTERNATIVES The consideration of alternatives to a proposed project is a requirement of the Offshore Petroleum Production and Pipelines Regulations. A comparison of alternatives helps to determine the best method of achieving the project by indicating the best available REPORT REF: GALIA ES D/4127/2011 02/05/2012 ENQUEST HEATHER LIMITED GALIA FIELD DEVELOPMENT technology (BAT) or the best environmental practice (BEP) or at the very least the option which minimises environmental impacts. Alternatives to the proposed project have been considered. The Galia field is a re- development of an existing oil field and is not within a zone designated as a currently feasible site for an alternative offshore energy technology such as wind. As such, the development for hydrocarbon development is considered to be the best option for providing a new energy source. EnQuest has investigated a range of hydrocarbon development options taking into account technical, environmental and economic factors, which are summarised below. Given the compact nature of the field and relatively short field life, the decommissioning strategy has played an important role in option selection (for further details see Section 3.2, Table 3-2). PRODUCTION SYSTEM Options: Tie in to Alma development & use of EnQuest Producer FPSO, or Provision of own production facilities Tie in to Alma development & use of EnQuest Producer FPSO was selected as the best production option.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CES Working Paper 07/00 RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES
    CES Working Paper 07/00 RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES Author: Tim Jackson ISSN: 1464-8083 RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES Tim Jackson ISSN: 1464-8083 Published by: Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey, Guildford (Surrey) GU2 7XH, United Kingdom http://www.surrey.ac.uk/CES Publication date: 2000 © Centre for Environmental Strategy, 2007 The views expressed in this document are those of the authors and not of the Centre for Environmental Strategy. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the authors and the publishers cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials. This publication and its contents may be reproduced as long as the reference source is cited. ROYAL COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION STUDY ON ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT Paper prepared as background to the Study Renewable Energy Sources March 1998 Dr Tim Jackson* and Dr Ragnar Löfstedt Centre for Environmental Strategy University of Surrey Guildford Surrey GU2 5XH E-mail: [email protected] The views expressed in the paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the thinking of the Royal Commission. Any queries about the paper should be directed to the author indicated * above. Whilst every reasonable effort has been made to ensure accurate transposition of the written reports onto the website, the Royal Commission cannot be held responsible for any accidental errors which might have been introduced during the transcription. Table of Contents Summary 1 Introduction 2 Renewable Energy Technologies
    [Show full text]
  • DNVGL-OS-E402 Diving Systems
    OFFSHORE STANDARDS DNVGL-OS-E402 Edition January 2017 Diving systems The content of this service document is the subject of intellectual property rights reserved by DNV GL AS ("DNV GL"). The user accepts that it is prohibited by anyone else but DNV GL and/or its licensees to offer and/or perform classification, certification and/or verification services, including the issuance of certificates and/or declarations of conformity, wholly or partly, on the basis of and/or pursuant to this document whether free of charge or chargeable, without DNV GL's prior written consent. DNV GL is not responsible for the consequences arising from any use of this document by others. The electronic pdf version of this document, available free of charge from http://www.dnvgl.com, is the officially binding version. DNV GL AS FOREWORD DNV GL offshore standards contain technical requirements, principles and acceptance criteria related to classification of offshore units. © DNV GL AS January 2017 Any comments may be sent by e-mail to [email protected] This service document has been prepared based on available knowledge, technology and/or information at the time of issuance of this document. The use of this document by others than DNV GL is at the user's sole risk. DNV GL does not accept any liability or responsibility for loss or damages resulting from any use of this document. CHANGES – CURRENT This document supersedes DNV-OS-E402 Offshore standard for Diving systems, October 2010 and DNV-DS- E403 Standard for Surface Diving Systems, July 2012 Changes in this document are highlighted in red colour.
    [Show full text]
  • Wessex Archaeology
    Wessex Archaeology HMS/m A1, Bracklesham Bay Designated Site Assessment Archaeological Report Ref: 53111.03jj April 2006 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SERVICES IN RELATION TO THE PROTECTION OF WRECKS ACT (1973) HMS/M A1, BRACKLESHAM BAY, WEST SUSSEX DESIGNATED SITE ASSESSMENT: ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Prepared by: Wessex Archaeology Portway House Old Sarum Park Salisbury WILTSHIRE SP4 6EB Prepared for: English Heritage Fort Cumberland Fort Cumberland Road Eastney Portsmouth PO4 9LD April 2006 Ref: 53111.03jj Wessex Archaeology Limited 2006 Wessex Archaeology Limited is a Registered Charity No.287786 HMS/m A1 Archaeological Report Ref: 53111.03jj HMS/M A1, BRACKLESHAM BAY, WEST SUSSEX DESIGNATED SITE ASSESSMENT: ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT Ref: 53111.03jj Summary Wessex Archaeology was commissioned by English Heritage to undertake a Designated Site Assessment of the HMS/m A1 site: a designated wreck located in Bracklesham Bay, West Sussex. The work was undertaken as part of the contract for Archaeological Services in Relation to the Protection of Wrecks Act (1973) (Figure 1). Wessex Archaeology diving operations took place in September and October 2005. A total of 11 dives were conducted, achieving a total dive time of 680 minutes (Appendix I). Diving investigations concentrated on an assessment of the wreck itself, supported by a photographic and video survey. A measured plan of the remains was produced. Two anomalies close to the site were also investigated, with one proving to be a corroded metal buoy and the other being a metal object of unknown function but not considered to be a part of the vessel. The hull structure was observed to be in and relatively good condition, despite areas of corrosion pitting along the outer casing on the top of the wreck.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Pays? Consumer Attitudes to the Growth of Levies to Fund Environmental and Social Energy Policy Objectives Prashant Vaze and Chris Hewett About Consumer Focus
    Who Pays? Consumer attitudes to the growth of levies to fund environmental and social energy policy objectives Prashant Vaze and Chris Hewett About Consumer Focus Consumer Focus is the statutory Following the recent consumer and consumer champion for England, Wales, competition reforms, the Government Scotland and (for postal consumers) has asked Consumer Focus to establish Northern Ireland. a new Regulated Industries Unit by April 2013 to represent consumers’ interests in We operate across the whole of the complex, regulated markets sectors. The economy, persuading businesses, Citizens Advice service will take on our public services and policy-makers to role in other markets from April 2013. put consumers at the heart of what they do. We tackle the issues that matter to Our Annual Plan for 2012/13 is available consumers, and give people a stronger online, consumerfocus.org.uk voice. We don’t just draw attention to problems – we work with consumers and with a range of organisations to champion creative solutions that make a difference to consumers’ lives. For regular updates from Consumer Focus, sign up to our monthly e-newsletter by emailing [email protected] or follow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/consumerfocus Consumer Focus Contents Executive summary .................................................................................................... 4 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 8 Background ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Policy and Biomass
    National Renewable Energy Laboratory Global (International) Energy Policy and Biomass Ralph P. Overend National Renewable Energy Laboratory California Biomass Collaboration – First Annual Forum January 8th , 2004 Sacramento, CA. NREL/PR-510-35561 Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy by Midwest Research Institute • Battelle • Bechtel Understanding Policy • Policies are applied against uncertain futures! • Can be – EXPLICIT as in having an “Energy Policy” •OR – IMPLICIT derived from the sum total of previous actions • Biomass Specific Policy – At the Intersection of several policies and jurisdictions • Energy • Environment • Land Use – Agriculture – Forestry – Rural Development • Urban •ZEN Rules – not having an Explicit policy can still be an Energy Policy! – However well meaning a policy – there is a law of unintended consequences World TPES 2000 (Total Primary Energy Supply = 448 EJ) • Food TPES – 2700 Cal/person/day 6% 2% – Popn. 6.1 Billion 6% • Source for Food TPES 35% –FAO.org 10% • Nuclear conversion – kWh = 10.8 MJ • Hydro conversion 19% –kWh = 3.6 MJ • source for fuel TPES (9700 22% Mtoe) – Iea.org Oil Coal N.Gas Biomass Food Nuclear Hydro Business as Usual - World Energy according to IEA WEO2002 • 2030 time horizon • TPES grows at 1.7%/a from 9179 – 15267 Mtoe – No shortage of traditional fossil fuel resources (see next slide) – Requires considerable investment > 17 T$ (2002) • About 1% of global GDP • 50% goes for infrastructure replacement • Electricity system needs about 10 T$ (50% in T&D) • Oil and Gas each about 3
    [Show full text]
  • Annex C Preliminary Uxo Threat Assessment
    Keadby 3 Low Carbon Gas Power Station Preliminary Environmental Information Report, Volume II - Appendix 13A: Phase 1 Desk Based Assessment Application Reference EN010114 ANNEX C PRELIMINARY UXO THREAT ASSESSMENT October 2020 Page 67 P RELIMINARY UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE (UXO) THREAT ASSESSMENT Meeting the requirements of CIRIA C681 ‘Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) – A guide for the Construction Industry’ Risk Management Framework PROJECT NUMBER 8472 ORIGINATOR D. Barrett VERSION NUMBER 1.0 REVIEWED BY L. Gregory (15th October 2020) CLIENT AECOM RELEASED BY R. Griffiths (15th October 2020) STUDY SITE Keadby 3 Low-Carbon Gas Power Station Project RECOMMENDATION No further action is required to address the UXO risk at this Study Site 6 Alpha Associates Limited, Unit 2A Woolpit Business Park, Bury St Edmunds, IP30 9UP, United Kingdom T: +44 (0)2033 713 900 | W: www.6alpha.com UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE THREAT ASSESSMENT STUDY SITE The Study Site is described as “Keadby 3 Low-Carbon Gas Power Station Project”, and it is centred on National Grid Reference 481834, 411442. THREAT POTENTIAL AND RECOMMENDATIONS The potential for a UXO hazard to occur, and more specifically, the potential for unexploded WWI and WWII ordnance to exist at this site is assessed as being UNLIKELY (Figure 2). In accordance with CIRIA C681 Chapter 5 on managing UXO risks, 6 Alpha concludes that NO FURTHER ACTION is required to address the UXO risk at this Study Site. Should you have any queries, please contact 6 Alpha. REPORT SUMMARY During WWII, the Study Site was situated within Isle of Axholme Rural District and Glanford Brigg Rural District, which recorded less than one and one High Explosive (HE) bomb strikes per 100 hectares respectively; both very low levels of bombing.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Reflections | 5 August 2011
    1 | Edison Investment Research | Seismic reflections | 5 August 2011 Seismic reflections Confidence in Kurdistan grows Iraq, including the autonomous Kurdistan region, probably has the world’s largest concentration of untapped, easily recoverable oil reserves. Pioneering moves were made into Kurdistan in the 2000s by the likes of Gulf Keystone and Hunt Oil, with considerable drill-bit success. In late July, two important Kurdistan exploration and development deals were announced. These involve Afren acquiring interests in two PSCs with sizeable contingent reserves and a Hess-Petroceltic partnership signing two PSCs for exploration purposes. With increasing production and Analysts improving relations between the regional and Iraqi federal governments, Ian McLelland +44 (0)20 3077 5756 these deals reflect growing confidence in Kurdistan’s potential as a major Peter J Dupont +44 (0)20 3077 5741 new petroleum province. Elaine Reynolds +44 (0)20 3077 5700 Krisztina Kovacs +44 (0)20 3077 5700 Anatomy of the Kurdistan oil province [email protected] 6,000 Kurdistan is located in the North Arabian basin and is on same fairway as the 5,500 prolific oilfields of Saudi Arabia’s Eastern Province, Kuwait, southern Iraq and Syria. 5,000 4,500 The geological backdrop to Kurdistan tends to be simple and is characterised by 4,000 3,500 large anticlinal structures, deep organic-rich sediments and carbonate reservoirs 3,000 mainly of Jurassic to Cretaceous age. Drilling commenced in the region in 2006. So far, 28 wells have been drilled, of which 20 have been discoveries, resulting in A pr/11 Oct/10 Jun/11 Fe b/11 Aug/10 Dec/10 Aug/11 estimated reserves of over 5.8bn boe.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment
    PROPOSED ACTION: Issuance of an Incidental Harassment Authorization to the United States Geological Service to Take Marine Mammals by Harassment Incidental to a Marine Geophysical Survey in the Northwest Atlantic Ocean TYPE OF STATEMENT: Environmental Assessment LEAD AGENCY: U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Donna S. Wieting, Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Jonathan Molineaux National Marine Fisheries Service Office of Protected Resources Permits and Conservation Division 1315 East West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910 301-427-8401 LOCATION: Northwest Atlantic Ocean ABSTRACT: This Environmental Assessment analyzes the environmental impacts of the National Marine Fisheries Service, Office of Protected Resources proposals to issue an Incidental Harassment Authorization (IHA) to the United States Geological Service by Level B harassment of small numbers of marine mammals incidental to a marine geophysical survey in the northwest Atlantic Ocean. The IHA would be valid from August 8, 2018 through August 7, 2019. DATE: July 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction and Purpose and Need ................................................................................. 4 1.1. Background ................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2. Applicant’s Incidental Take Authorization Request ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CLIMATE JUSTICE: the International Momentum Towards Climate Litigation
    CLIMATE JUSTICE: The international momentum towards climate litigation Keely Boom, Julie-Anne Richards and Stephen Leonard CLIMATE JUSTICE: The international momentum towards climate litigation Keely Boom, Julie-Anne Richards and Stephen Leonard 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Paris Agreement is ground breaking yet contradictory. In an era of fractured multilateralism it achieved above and beyond what was considered politically possible – yet it stopped far short of what is necessary to stop dangerous climate change. In the Paris Agreement, countries agreed to pursue efforts to limit warming to 1.5C, yet the mitigation pledges on the table at Paris will result in roughly 3C of warming, with insufficient finance to implement those pledges. The Paris Agreement was widely acknowledged to signal the end of the fossil fuel era, yet it does not explicitly use the words ‘fossil fuels’ throughout the entire document, nor does it contain any binding requirements that governments commit to any concrete climate recovery steps. Now, citizens and governments are beginning to seek redress in court with ground breaking cases emerging around the world, in a whole new area of litigation, some of which can be compared with the beginnings of - and based on some of the legal precedents set by - legal action against the tobacco industry. Other new strategies are focused not only on private industry but on the sovereign responsibility of governments to preserve constitutional and public trust rights to a stable climate and healthy atmosphere on behalf of both present and future generations. Climate litigation has spread beyond the US into new jurisdictions throughout Asia, the Pacific and Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • UKCS Technology Insights
    UKCS Technology Insights April 2019 Unless identified elsewhere, all data is from the OGA UKSS 2017 and 2018 Cover photos: High frequency FWI image – courtesy of DownUnder Geosolutions using Capreolus 3D data from TGS Ocean bottom nodes – courtesy of Magseis Fairfield Riserless mud recovery – courtesy of Enhanced Drilling Carbon composite pipe – courtesy of Magma Global Contents Foreword 5 1. Seismic and exploration 22 Executive summary 6 2. Well drilling and completions 28 Operators’ technology plans 8 3. Subsea systems 34 Existing technologies for MER UK 12 4. Installations and topsides 40 Emerging technologies – MER UK priorities 14 5. Reservoir and well management 46 OGA’s technology stewardship 16 6. Facilities management 52 The Oil & Gas Technology Centre (OGTC) 18 7. Well plugging and abandonment 58 Technology plan feedback 21 8. Facilities decommissioning 64 Conclusions 70 Appendix - Technology spend 72 Image courtesy of Airbourne Oil & Gas Foreword I am pleased to see constant progress in the way our industry is OGTC, MER UK Taskforces and industry sponsors. A small maturing and deploying new technologies for the UK Continental technical team will be established to measure progress on all key Shelf (UKCS). This important effort is being supported by the objectives. Ultimately, these objectives will be followed up and coordinated work of the Oil and Gas Authority (OGA), the monitored through the OGA stewardship to further encourage Technology Leadership Board (TLB) and the Oil & Gas Technology uptake and share best practice. Centre (OGTC). There are huge prizes in reserves growth, production value and, This year’s Technology Insights summarises the rich content of most importantly, safe asset operation and life extension from the UKCS operators’ technology plans, submitted through the OGA use of current and new technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Cboe UK Energy Sector Index BUKENGY
    Cboe UK Energy Sector Index BUKENGY Page 1 August 2021 Cboe Exchange This sector represents oil and gas exploration and production, pipeline transportation, refineries, and oil and gas equipment and services; leasing, mining and processing of coal and coke; uranium, radium, and vanadium mining. The parent index is the Cboe UK All Companies (BUKAC). The index base level is 10,000 as of December 31st, 2010. This is a price return index. Objective The index is designed for use in the creation of index tracking funds, derivatives and as a performance benchmark. Investability Liquidity Transparency Availability Stocks are selected and Stocks are screened to Uses a transparent, rules-based Calculation is based on weighted to ensure that the ensure that the index is construction process. Index price and total return index is investable. tradable. Rules are freely available on the methodologies, both real cboe.com/europe/indices -time, intra-second and website. end of day. Statistics Index ISIN Ticker RIC Currency Cboe UK Energy Sector DE000SLA1DG2 BUKENGY .BUKENGY GBP Cboe UK Energy Sector - net DE000SLA18D0 BUKENGYN .BUKENGYN GBP Volatility Volatility (1y) 0.3275 Returns(%) 1M 3M 6M YTD 1Y 3Y 5Y BUKENGY 1.09 3.25 2.86 16.26 30.06 -39.85 -22.82 BUKENGYN 2.04 4.23 4.96 19.59 35.34 -29.77 1.02 Top 5 Performers Country 1 month return % CAIRN ENERGY PLC UNITED KINGDOM 50.59 JOHN WOOD GROUP PLC UNITED KINGDOM 14.57 HARBOUR ENERGY PLC UNITED KINGDOM 8.75 DIVERSIFIED ENERGY CO PLC UNITED KINGDOM 5.31 ENQUEST PLC UNITED KINGDOM 4.49 Historical Performance Chart 40% 20% 0% -20% -40% 2011 2013 2014 2016 2017 2018 2020 2021 Cboe UK Energy Sector (GBP) Cboe UK All Companies (GBP) Cboe.com | ©Cboe | /CboeGlobalMarkets | /company/cboe © 2021 Cboe Exchange, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore-Brochure-Compact.Pdf
    About Us Cybermarine is an ISO certified leading Offshore Design & Engineering Enterprise with global operations. Cybermarine is headquartered in Singapore and delivers projects worldwide through offices at Houston, Mumbai and Kolkata. Cybermarine as a company built from scratch, has developed innovative technology and processes over the years and is in a position to deliver wide ranging design and engineering solutions to the upstream oil & gas industry. Cybermarine, by utilizing its proficiency in engineering & extensive design experience has successfully delivered a range of design and engineering solutions on Jack- up Rigs, Semi-submersibles and FPSOs Design & Engineering projects are executed using innovative and well-developed technology, which include Work Break-Down, Design-Spirals and 3D Space Arrangements/Models. The execution is augmented by well laid-down processes consisting of work specification spreadsheets and process checklists. Our technical teams are organized as project teams and operations' teams. Project teams comprise of project managers and project engineers responsible for project management and client interaction. Project teams are stationed in all our offices in various geographical locations. Operations' teams comprising of Naval Architects/Engineers/Designers are responsible for project Deliveries and class approvals. They are stationed in Mumbai, India and Singapore. We also have a Marine Division catering to the Design and Engineering of Multi-purpose support vessels, Cargo Vessels and other special vessels used in dredging and marine construction. 02 Service Segments Our services extend to the entire range of Floating assets used in the Offshore Industry and covers following types of vessels: New Designs Offshore Support Vessels DSV MPV Accommodation Barges Well Stimulation Vessels Conversions Simple Vessels to high end complex Offshore Vessels Type Conversions, i.e.
    [Show full text]