DOCSLIB.ORG

Bolinas Lagoon Ecosystem Restoration Feasibility Project Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bolinas Lagoon Ecosystem Restoration Feasibility Project Final Bolinas Lagoon Ecosystem Restoration Feasibility Project Final Public Reports II Projecting the Future of Bolinas Lagoon 3KLOLS:LOOLDPV $VVRFLDWHV/WG :HWODQG5HVHDUFK$VVRFLDWHV PROJECTING THE FUTURE EVOLUTION OF BOLINAS LAGOON Final Public Draft Prepared for Marin County Open Space District with funding from The California Coastal Conservancy Prepared by Philip Williams & Associates, Ltd. with WRA, Inc. July 2006 PWA REF. # 1686.02 July 2006 Services provided pursuant to this Agreement are intended solely for the use and benefit of the Marin County Open Space District. No other person or entity shall be entitled to rely on the services, opinions, recommendations, plans or specifications provided pursuant to this agreement without the express written consent of Philip Williams & Associates, Ltd., 720 California Street, 6th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94108. P:\Projects\1686.02_BolinasLagoonERP-Phase2b\Task08_Reporting\PublicDraft_07.06\Bolinas_FinalPublicDraft_July2006.doc July 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 3 2.1 Summary of Key Findings 3 2.2 Specific Conclusions 4 3. PAST EVOLUTION OF BOLINAS LAGOON 9 3.1 Sediment Budget, Sediment Dynamics and Equilibrium Form 9 3.2 Natural Evolution of Bolinas Lagoon 12 3.2.1 Evolution over Geologic Time and the Role of Large Earthquakes 12 3.2.2 Mechanisms of Sediment Delivery 13 3.2.3 Relative Magnitudes of Littoral and Alluvial Sources 16 3.2.4 The Tidal Inlet and Estuarine Processes 16 3.2.5 Ecological Response to Changing Physical Conditions 17 3.3 19th Century Lagoon Conditions 18 3.3.1 Conditions Prior to Significant Disturbances 18 3.3.2 Land Use Changes in the 19th Century 21 3.4 The 1906 Earthquake and Its Effects On Sediment Delivery 22 3.4.1 Subsidence During the 1906 Earthquake 22 3.4.2 20th Century Sedimentation Rates and Sources 26 3.4.3 Accelerated Tidal Dispersion of Littoral Sediments 27 3.5 Recent Changes to Lagoon Morphology 29 3.5.1 Sediment Accumulation and Marsh Expansion 29 3.5.2 Artificial Fill 33 3.6 Historic Changes To Tidal Prism 33 4. EXISTING LAGOON CONDITIONS 38 4.1 Active Physical Processes and Sediment Dynamics 38 4.1.1 Sediment Delivery from Littoral and Alluvial Sources 38 4.1.2 Wind-Wave Erosion Over Exposed Mudflats 42 4.1.3 Tidal Dispersion of Beach Sands 42 4.2 The Present Form of Bolinas Lagoon 46 4.3 Existing Ecological Processes 48 4.3.1 Lagoon Habitats 48 4.3.2 Lagoon Species Diversity and Abundance 55 4.4 Field Studies: Characterizing Baseline Ecological Conditions 64 P:\Projects\1686.02_BolinasLagoonERP-Phase2b\Task08_Reporting\PublicDraft_07.06\Bolinas_FinalPublicDraft_July2006.doc i July 2006 5. FUTURE EVOLUTION OF BOLINAS LAGOON 65 5.1 Methodology for Projecting Future Lagoon Conditions 65 5.2 Changes in the Sediment Budget 66 5.2.1 Changes to Inputs and Outputs 66 5.2.2 Changes in Storage Terms 68 5.3 Changes in Sediment Dynamics 68 5.4 Evolution of Geomorphic Units 70 5.5 Cumulative Changes in Lagoon Morphology 79 5.6 Changes in Tidal Prism and Inlet Stability 81 5.7 Trends in Lagoon Evolution Beyond 50 Years 85 5.8 Potential Ecological Changes 87 5.8.1 Expected Shifts in Habitat Distribution and Abundance 87 5.8.2 Effect of Habitat Types on Ecological Function 92 6. HUMAN-INDUCED CHANGES TO LAGOON CONDITIONS 94 7. MONITORING AND ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT 97 7.1 Managing in the Face of Uncertainty 97 7.2 Establishing Management Goals and Objectives 100 7.3 Making Management Plans Operational 101 7.4 Suggested Monitoring at Bolinas Lagoon 103 7.4.1 Monitoring Physical Elements 104 7.4.2 Monitoring Biological Elements 106 8. ACKNOWLDGEMENTS 109 9. REFERENCES 110 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A – Field Studies: Establishing Baseline Conditions Appendix B – Tidal Datums, Benchmarks and Estimates of Historic Tidal Prism Appendix C – Estimating Watershed Delivery LIST OF TABLES Table 3-1. Habitat Distribution in 1854 21 Table 3-2. Habitat Distribution in 1929 25 Table 3-3. Average Rate of 20th Century Tidal Prism Loss 37 Table 4-1. Selected Estuarine Invertebrates of Bolinas Lagoon 56 Table 4-2. Fish Species Documented to Occur in Bolinas Lagoon 60 Table 5-1. Projected Change in Lagoon Morphology 81 Table 5-2. Results of Inlet Stability Analysis 85 Table 6-1. Anthropogenic Activities and Their Effect on Tidal Prism 96 P:\Projects\1686.02_BolinasLagoonERP-Phase2b\Task08_Reporting\PublicDraft_07.06\Bolinas_FinalPublicDraft_July2006.doc ii July 2006 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1. Location Map 2 Figure 3-1. Sediment Budget Framework 10 Figure 3-2. Concept of Punctuated Dynamic Equilibrium 11 Figure 3-3. Physical Processes Affecting Bolinas Lagoon 14 Figure 3-4. The Lagoon Survey of 1854 19 Figure 3-5. 19th Century Lightering Wharfs and Barges 20 Figure 3-6. The Lagoon Survey of 1929 23 Figure 3-7. Lagoon Morphological Changes: 1854-1929 24 Figure 3-8. Potential Strength of Tidal Dispersion After the 1906 Quake 28 Figure 3-9. Late 20th Century Marsh Expansion in the South Arm 30 Figure 3-10. Late 20th Century Progradation of Pine Gulch Creek and Kent Island Marshes 31 Figure 3-11. Late 20th Century Marsh Expansion in the North Basin 32 Figure 3-12. Construction of Seadrift Lagoon 34 Figure 3-13. Modifications along Highway 1 35 Figure 3-14. Tidal Prism Change: 1854 to Present 36 Figure 4-1. Locations of Measured Tidal Currents 39 Figure 4-2. Tidal Asymmetry at Inlet and Tidal Channels 40 Figure 4-3. Eroded Silt Transported through Inlet During Flood Tides 41 Figure 4-4. Suspended Sediment Delivery by Pine Gulch Creek 43 Figure 4-5. Mudflat Profiles: 1968-2004 44 Figure 4-6. Declining Strength of Tidal Dispersion with Reduction in Tidal Prism 45 Figure 4-7. Distribution of Morphologic Units and Habitat Types: Year 0 47 Figure 5-1. Potential Future Reduction in Tidal Dispersion Strength 67 Figure 5-2. Potential Sea Level Rise 69 Figure 5-3. Sheltering of Wind Waves in Bolinas Lagoon 71 Figure 5-4. Location of UC Berkeley Sediment Cores 73 Figure 5-5. Vertical and Horizontal Accretion in the North Basin 74 Figure 5-6. Calculating the Volumetric Change of Pine Gulch Creek Delta: 1968 – 1998 76 Figure 5-7. Radial Expansion of Pine Gulch Creek Delta 77 Figure 5-8. Linear Extension and Fetch Blocking Effects of Kent Island 78 Figure 5-9. Distribution of Morphologic Units and Habitat Types: Year 50 80 Figure 5-10. Changes to Lagoon Elevation-Area Characteristics 83 Figure 5-11. Fluctuations in Inlet Stability due to Changing Tides and Ocean Waves 84 Figure 5-12. Potential Long-Term Equilibrium Condition 86 Figure 6-1. Marsh Expansion Due to the Progradation of Pine Gulch Creek Delta 95 Figure 7-1. The Adaptive Management Process 98 Figure 7-2. An Adaptive Management Framework for Bolinas Lagoon 99 Figure 7-3. Using 'Operational' Conceptual Models to Establish Management Actions 102 P:\Projects\1686.02_BolinasLagoonERP-Phase2b\Task08_Reporting\PublicDraft_07.06\Bolinas_FinalPublicDraft_July2006.doc iii July 2006 GLOSSARY OF TERMS Aggradation vertical expansion of a geomorphic feature Alluvium material, such as sand, silt or clay, deposited on land by streams Alluvial fan the fanlike deposit of a stream where it issues from a gorge upon a plain or of a tributary stream near or at its junction with its main stream Anthropogenic of or pertaining to humans Bedload sediment transported by water close to or on the bottom by rolling, sliding or bouncing Brackish a mixture of fresh and salty water Delta a body of alluvium having a surface that is nearly flat and fan shaped; deposited at or near the mouth of a river or stream where it enters a body of relatively quiet water, generally a sea or lake El Nino a major warming of the equatorial waters in the Pacific Ocean; El Nino events usually occur every 3 to 7 years, and are characterized by shifts in "normal" weather patterns Episodic occurring, appearing, or changing at usually irregular intervals Estuary an embayment of the coast in which fresh river water entering at its head mixes with the relatively saline ocean water Fluvial of or pertaining to rivers; produced by river action, as a fluvial plain Geomorphic the form and process of landforms Holocene a period of time covering the past 10,000 years Hypersaline very high salinity Incision erosion and down-cutting of channels by low sediment-high energy discharges Intertidal pertaining to the elevations between those of MHHW and MLLW; undergo wetting and drying consistent with tidal propagation Lagoon a shallow body of water, separated from the sea by a sand-spit; lagoons may be continuously, occasionally or periodically connected to the ocean Littoral of or related to the littoral zone; the relatively narrow portion of a coast affected by wave energy and longshore currents Morphology characterization of form and process Neap tides the tides resulting when the sun and moon are at right angles to each other, characterized by a reduced tidal range Prograde lateral expansion of a geomorphic feature Sedimentary formed by or from deposits of sediment Spring tides tides resulting when the gravitational forces exerted on the earth by the sun and moon are acting in the same direction Subtidal pertaining to the elevations consistently below MLLW Suspended load volume of sediment transported in suspension by water; moves at a velocity slightly lower than that of water without many intermittent stages of deposition Supratidal pertaining to the elevations consistently below MHHW Tectonics describing the forces that cause the movements and deformation of Earth’s crust on a large scale P:\Projects\1686.02_BolinasLagoonERP-Phase2b\Task08_Reporting\PublicDraft_07.06\Bolinas_FinalPublicDraft_July2006.doc iv July 2006 Tidal damping attenuation (reduction) of the tidal range Tidal prism the volume of water between the high-tide surface and the low-tide surface of an embayment, estuary or creek Suspended load term relating sediment to river flow; consists of small particles generally in suspension and not found on the bottom even during low energy intervals P:\Projects\1686.02_BolinasLagoonERP-Phase2b\Task08_Reporting\PublicDraft_07.06\Bolinas_FinalPublicDraft_July2006.doc v July 2006 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Seismic Shift Diablo Canyon Literally and Figuratively on Shaky Ground
    SEISMIC SHIFT DIABLO CANYON LITERALLY AND FIGURATIVELY ON SHAKY GROUND Five years ago, Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) informed the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) about a newly discovered fault offshore from its Diablo Canyon nuclear plant that could cause more ground motion during an earthquake than the plant was designed to withstand. In other words, there was a gap between seismic protection levels of the plant and the seismic threat levels it faced. When similar gaps were identified at other nuclear facilities in California, New York, Pennsylvania, Maine, and Virginia, the facilities were not permitted to generate electricity until the gaps were closed. The electricity generation gaps did not trump the seismic protection gaps: the need for safety was deemed more important than the need for electricity and its revenues. But the two reactors at Diablo Canyon continue operating despite the seismic protection gap. In the former cases the NRC would not allow nuclear facilities to operate until they demonstrated an adequate level of safety through compliance with federal regulations. It wasn’t that evidence showed disaster was looming on the horizon. Instead, it was that evidence failed to show that the risk of disaster was being properly managed. At Diablo Canyon the NRC has flipped the risk management construct. Despite solid evidence that Diablo Canyon does not conform to regulatory requirements, the nuclear version of the “no blood, no foul” rule is deemed close enough to let its reactors continue operating. This seismic shift places Diablo Canyon’s two aging reactors literally and figuratively on shaky ground. If an earthquake occurs, it may result in more damage than the nuclear plant can withstand, with dire consequences for tens of thousands of Californians.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lesser Antilles Incuding Trinidad
    The brilliant Lesser Antillean Barn Owl again showed superbly. One of several potential splits not yet recognized by the IOC (Pete Morris) THE LESSER ANTILLES INCUDING TRINIDAD 5 – 20/25 JUNE 2015 LEADERS: PETE MORRIS After our successful tour around the Caribbean in 2013, it was great to get back again this year. It all seemed pretty straightforward this time around, and once again we cleaned up on all of the available endemics, po- 1 BirdQuest Tour Report:The Lesser Antilles www.birdquest-tours.com The fabulous White-breasted Thrasher from Martinique (Pete Morris) tential splits and other goodies. For sure, this was no ordinary Caribbean holiday! During the first couple of weeks we visited no fewer than ten islands (Antigua, Barbuda, Montserrat, Dominica, Guadeloupe, Martinique, St Lucia, St Vincent, Barbados and Grenada), a logistical feat of some magnitude. With plenty of LIAT flights (the islanders refer to LIAT as ‘Leave Island any Time’ and ‘Luggage in Another Terminal’ to name but two of the many funny phrases coined from LIAT) and unreliable AVIS car hire reservations, we had our work cut out, but in the end, all worked out! It’s always strange birding on islands with so few targets, but with so many islands to pack-in, we were never really short of things to do. All of the endemics showed well and there were some cracking highlights, including the four smart endemic amazons, the rare Grenada Dove, the superb Lesser Antillean Barn Owl, the unique tremblers and White-breasted Thrashers, and a series of colourful endemic orioles to name just a few! At the end of the Lesser Antilles adventure we enjoyed a few days on Trinidad.
    [Show full text]
  • DCL-2011-600.Pdf
    Central Coastal California Seismic Imaging Project Attachment 1 ATTACHMENT 1 PACIFIC GAS and ELECTRIC COMPANY APPLICATION FOR RESOURCE LEASE, PERMIT OR OTHER ENTITLEMENT FOR USE CENTRAL COASTAL CALIFORNIA SEISMIC IMAGING PROJECT Part 1, Section A, Item1. The following PG&E personnel are the project contacts throughout the environmental analysis and permitting processes for the Central Coastal California Seismic Imaging Project (CCCSIP): Mr. Mark Krause, Director, State Agency Relations 1415 L. Street, Suite 280 Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: 916-721-5709 Fax: 916-386-6720 e-mail: [email protected] Mr. Loren Sharp, Senior Director, Technical Services Diablo Canyon Power Plant Mail Code 104/6/603 PO Box 56 Avila Beach, California 93424 Phone: 805-781-9785 Fax: 805-545-4884 e-mail: [email protected] Dr. Stuart Nishenko, Senior Seismologist, Geosciences Mail Code N4C PO Box 770000 San Francisco, California 94177 Phone: 415-973-1213 Fax: 415-973-1409 e-mail: [email protected] Sarah Gassner, Supervisor, Land-Environmental Planning and Permitting 1455 E. Shaw Avenue Fresno, California 93710 Phone: 559-263-5073 Fax: 559-263-5262 e-mail: [email protected] Part 1, Section A, Item 2. PG&E has designated following company/personnel as agents for the Offshore Seismic Imaging Project: Mr. Ray de Wit, Senior Project Manager Padre Associates, Inc. 1485 Enea Court, Bldg. G, Suite 1480 Concord, California 94520 Phone: 925-685-9441 X 21 Fax: 925-685-8401 e-mail: [email protected] Page - 1 Central Coastal California Seismic Imaging Project Attachment 1 Mr. Simon Poulter, Partner Padre Associates, Inc. 5290 Overpass Road, Suite 217 Goleta, California 93111 Phone: 805-683-1233 X 4 Fax: 805-683-3944 e-mail: [email protected] Page - 2 Central Coastal California Seismic Imaging Project Attachment 2 ATTACHMENT 2 PACIFIC GAS and ELECTRIC COMPANY APPLICATION FOR RESOURCE LEASE, PERMIT OR OTHER ENTITLEMENT FOR USE CENTRAL COASTAL CALIFORNIA SEISMIC IMAGING PROJECT DESCRIPTION Part I, Section E, Item 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3.4 Biological Resources 3.4- Biological Resources
    SECTION 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 3.4- BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES This section discusses the existing sensitive biological resources of the San Francisco Bay Estuary (the Estuary) that could be affected by project-related construction and locally increased levels of boating use, identifies potential impacts to those resources, and recommends mitigation strategies to reduce or eliminate those impacts. The Initial Study for this project identified potentially significant impacts on shorebirds and rafting waterbirds, marine mammals (harbor seals), and wetlands habitats and species. The potential for spread of invasive species also was identified as a possible impact. 3.4.1 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES SETTING HABITATS WITHIN AND AROUND SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY The vegetation and wildlife of bayland environments varies among geographic subregions in the bay (Figure 3.4-1), and also with the predominant land uses: urban (commercial, residential, industrial/port), urban/wildland interface, rural, and agricultural. For the purposes of discussion of biological resources, the Estuary is divided into Suisun Bay, San Pablo Bay, Central San Francisco Bay, and South San Francisco Bay (See Figure 3.4-2). The general landscape structure of the Estuary’s vegetation and habitats within the geographic scope of the WT is described below. URBAN SHORELINES Urban shorelines in the San Francisco Estuary are generally formed by artificial fill and structures armored with revetments, seawalls, rip-rap, pilings, and other structures. Waterways and embayments adjacent to urban shores are often dredged. With some important exceptions, tidal wetland vegetation and habitats adjacent to urban shores are often formed on steep slopes, and are relatively recently formed (historic infilled sediment) in narrow strips.
    [Show full text]
  • Dunphy Park / Cass Gidley Marina
    1 San Francisco Bay Area Water Trail Site Description for Dunphy Park / Cass Gidley Marina Location, Ownership, and Management: Dunphy Park is a shoreline park owned and managed by the City of Sausalito. The small beach within the park has long served as a popular launch for paddling on Richardson Bay, to Angel Island, and beyond. The historic Cass Gidley Marina is located along the northern side of the park. Dunphy Park is currently undergoing major renovations anticipated to be completed in 2020. Similarly, the Cass Gidley Marina is being redeveloped into the Sausalito Community Boating Center, which will provide access for paddlers and programs for small sailing craft. Contact Name: Mike Langford, Parks and Recreation Director Contact Phone: (415) 289-4126 Contact E-mail: [email protected] Dunphy Park Beach (2019) Dunphy Park Beach (2005) Cass Gidley Marina Facility Description: The non-motorized small boat (NMSB) community has long used the beach at Dunphy Park for launching and landing. Historically, users would park in the unpaved parking area and use adjacent lawn areas to laydown equipment before launching from the small beach. Dunphy Park is currently being redesigned (Fall 2019), which will include improved water access facilities. As part of the Dunphy Park redesign, an ADA ramp and path of travel for beach access will be installed. Steps down to the shoreline will also be provided adjacent to the ramp. Additionally, new ADA restrooms will replace existing portables and parking will be reconfigured to expand capacity and allow better flow. A boat washdown and drinking fountain will also be installed.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Design Documentation
    Appendix A: Conceptual Design Documentation APPENDIX A Conceptual Design Documentation June 2019 A-1 APPENDIX A: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN DOCUMENTATION The environmental analyses in the NEPA and CEQA documents for the proposed improvements at Oceano County Airport (the Airport) are based on conceptual designs prepared to provide a realistic basis for assessing their environmental consequences. 1. Widen runway from 50 to 60 feet 2. Widen Taxiways A, A-1, A-2, A-3, and A-4 from 20 to 25 feet 3. Relocate segmented circle and wind cone 4. Installation of taxiway edge lighting 5. Installation of hold position signage 6. Installation of a new electrical vault and connections 7. Installation of a pollution control facility (wash rack) CIVIL ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS The purpose of this conceptual design effort is to identify the amount of impervious surface, grading (cut and fill) and drainage implications of the projects identified above. The conceptual design calculations detailed in the following figures indicate that Projects 1 and 2, widening the runways and taxiways would increase the total amount of impervious surface on the Airport by 32,016 square feet, or 0.73 acres; a 6.6 percent increase in the Airport’s impervious surface area. Drainage patterns would remain the same as both the runway and taxiways would continue to sheet flow from their centerlines to the edge of pavement and then into open, grassed areas. The existing drainage system is able to accommodate the modest increase in stormwater runoff that would occur, particularly as soil conditions on the Airport are conducive to infiltration. Figure A-1 shows the locations of the seven projects incorporated in the Proposed Action.
    [Show full text]
  • Goga Wrfr.Pdf
    The National Park Service Water Resources Division is responsible for providing water resources management policy and guidelines, planning, technical assistance, training, and operational support to units of the National Park System. Program areas include water rights, water resources planning, regulatory guidance and review, hydrology, water quality, watershed management, watershed studies, and aquatic ecology. Technical Reports The National Park Service disseminates the results of biological, physical, and social research through the Natural Resources Technical Report Series. Natural resources inventories and monitoring activities, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of technical workshops and conferences are also disseminated through this series. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. Copies of this report are available from the following: National Park Service (970) 225-3500 Water Resources Division 1201 Oak Ridge Drive, Suite 250 Fort Collins, CO 80525 National Park Service (303) 969-2130 Technical Information Center Denver Service Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287 Cover photos: Top: Golden Gate Bridge, Don Weeks Middle: Rodeo Lagoon, Joel Wagner Bottom: Crissy Field, Joel Wagner ii CONTENTS Contents, iii List of Figures, iv Executive Summary, 1 Introduction, 7 Water Resources Planning, 9 Location and Demography, 11 Description of Natural Resources, 12 Climate, 12 Physiography, 12 Geology, 13 Soils, 13
    [Show full text]
  • A Passion for Rhinoceros and Stag Beetles in Japan
    SCARABS CZ CN MNCHEM, NBYS QCFF WIGY. Occasional Issue Number 67 Print ISSN 1937-8343 Online ISSN 1937-8351 September, 2011 A Passion for Rhinoceros and Stag Beetles WITHIN THIS ISSUE in Japan Dynastid and Lucanid Enthusiasm in Japan ........ 1 by Kentaro Miwa University of Nebraska-Lincoln Bug People XXIV ........... 10 Department of Entomology In Past Years XLVI ......... 11 [email protected] Guatemala Scarabs IV ... 20 BACK ISSUES Available At These Sites: Coleopterists Society www.coleopsoc.org/de- fault.asp?Action=Show_ Resources&ID=Scarabs University of Nebraska A large population of the general public in Japan enjoys collecting and www-museum.unl.edu/ rearing insects. Children are exposed to insects at early ages because their research/entomology/ parents are interested in insects. My son went on his first collecting trip Scarabs-Newsletter.htm on a cool day in March in Nebraska when he was four months old. EDITORS I am from Shizuoka, Japan. I am currently pursuing my Ph.D in En- Rich Cunningham tomology at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and studying biology [email protected] and applied ecology of insets in cropping systems. Among many insect Olivier Décobert taxa I am interested in, dynastines and lucanids are my favorite groups. [email protected] I have enjoyed collecting and rearing these beetles throughout my life. Barney Streit I began collecting beetles with my parents and grandparents when barneystreit@hotmail. com I was two years old. When I was about six, I learned to successfully rear some Japanese species. Since I came to the United States, I have been enjoying working with American species.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Study/Environmental Assessment: Kent Island Restoration at Bolinas Lagoon
    DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: KENT ISLAND RESTORATION AT BOLINAS LAGOON Marin County Open Space District and US Army Corps of Engineers San Francisco District August 2012 DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: KENT ISLAND RESTORATION AT BOLINAS LAGOON PREPARED FOR Marin County Open Space District Marin County Civic Center 3501 Civic Center Drive, Room 260 San Rafael, CA 94903 (415) 499-6387 and US Army Corps of Engineers San Francisco District 1455 Market St San Francisco, CA 94103 (415) 503-6703 PREPARED BY Carmen Ecological Consulting Grassetti Environmental Consulting Peter R. Baye, Coastal Ecologist, Botanist August 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose of this Document ............................................................................................................1 1.2 Document Structure ..............................................................................................................1 2.0 PROPOSED PROJECT AND ALTERNATIVES .......................................................................3 2.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................3 2.2 Environmental Setting ..............................................................................................................3 2.3 Purpose and Need ..............................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Toll Roads in the United States: History and Current Policy
    TOLL FACILITIES IN THE UNITED STATES Bridges - Roads - Tunnels - Ferries August 2009 Publication No: FHWA-PL-09-00021 Internet: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/tollpage.htm Toll Roads in the United States: History and Current Policy History The early settlers who came to America found a land of dense wilderness, interlaced with creeks, rivers, and streams. Within this wilderness was an extensive network of trails, many of which were created by the migration of the buffalo and used by the Native American Indians as hunting and trading routes. These primitive trails were at first crooked and narrow. Over time, the trails were widened, straightened and improved by settlers for use by horse and wagons. These became some of the first roads in the new land. After the American Revolution, the National Government began to realize the importance of westward expansion and trade in the development of the new Nation. As a result, an era of road building began. This period was marked by the development of turnpike companies, our earliest toll roads in the United States. In 1792, the first turnpike was chartered and became known as the Philadelphia and Lancaster Turnpike in Pennsylvania. It was the first road in America covered with a layer of crushed stone. The boom in turnpike construction began, resulting in the incorporation of more than 50 turnpike companies in Connecticut, 67 in New York, and others in Massachusetts and around the country. A notable turnpike, the Boston-Newburyport Turnpike, was 32 miles long and cost approximately $12,500 per mile to construct. As the Nation grew, so did the need for improved roads.
    [Show full text]
  • Bolinas Lagoon Is One of Marin County's Most Significant Natural
    "The lagoon is one of Marin County's most significant natural resources. The lagoon tidelands are publicly-owned. ... Along with Drake's Estero and Tomales Bay, Bolinas Lagoon provides an important coastal environment for fish, birds and mammals that is unparalleled along the northern California coast between San Francisco and Humboldt Bays. Open water, mudflat and marsh provide productive and diverse habitats for marine fishes, waterbirds, and marine mammals. Bolinas Lagoon is part of a much larger protected natural habitat complex that is part of or adjoins the Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary (GFNMS, Pt. Reyes National Seashore, Golden Gate National Recreation Area, Central California Coast Biosphere Preserve, Mt. Tamalpais State Park, and the Audubon Canyon Ranch Bird Sanctuary." Bolinas Lagoon. Located in California, less than 20 kilometers up the coast from San Francisco’s Golden Gate Bridge, Bolinas Lagoon is a tidal embayment of open water, mudflat, and marsh which provides productive and diverse habitats for marine fishes, waterbirds, and marine mammals, and it is also part of a much larger protected natural habitat complex in the region. The site is located on the Pacific Flyway, which makes the Lagoon an ideal staging ground and stopover site for migratory birds, and the temperate climate provides wintering habitat for a wide array of ducks, geese, and shorebirds. The area supports a number of recreational uses, including the use of manually-powered watercraft. Bolinas Lagoon Open Space Preserve Marin County Open Space District Bolinas Lagoon is one of Marin County’s most significant natural resources. Its 1,100 acres, known as the Bolinas Lagoon Open Space Preserve and managed by the Marin County Open Space District, was designated a Wetland of International Importance by the Ramsar Convention in 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES an Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals
    OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES An Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals By Paul Rudy, Jr. Lynn Hay Rudy Oregon Institute of Marine Biology University of Oregon Charleston, Oregon 97420 Contract No. 79-111 Project Officer Jay F. Watson U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 500 N.E. Multnomah Street Portland, Oregon 97232 Performed for National Coastal Ecosystems Team Office of Biological Services Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 Table of Contents Introduction CNIDARIA Hydrozoa Aequorea aequorea ................................................................ 6 Obelia longissima .................................................................. 8 Polyorchis penicillatus 10 Tubularia crocea ................................................................. 12 Anthozoa Anthopleura artemisia ................................. 14 Anthopleura elegantissima .................................................. 16 Haliplanella luciae .................................................................. 18 Nematostella vectensis ......................................................... 20 Metridium senile .................................................................... 22 NEMERTEA Amphiporus imparispinosus ................................................ 24 Carinoma mutabilis ................................................................ 26 Cerebratulus californiensis .................................................. 28 Lineus ruber .........................................................................
    [Show full text]