DOCSLIB.ORG

MARIN COUNTY LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM UNIT 1 - Amended

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MARIN COUNTY LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM UNIT 1 - Amended MARIN COUNTY LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM UNIT 1 - Amended MARIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 3501 Civic Center Drive, Room 308 San Rafael, California 94903 M A R I N C O U N T Y L O C A L C O A S T A L P R O G R A M U N I T I Amended ADOPTED BY MARIN COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS August 21, 1979 CERTIFIED BY STATE COASTAL COMMISSION April 1, 1980 The following document is the current amended version of the 1981 Marin County LCP Unit I, which reflects all policy text amendments approved by the California Coastal Commission from 1982 to 2004. Following each amended policy is a note that provides the details of the Resolution(s)/Ordinance(s) passed by the Marin County Board of Supervisors that proposed and adopted each text amendment, as well as the corresponding action(s) of the California Coastal Commission. All information contained herein is current as of April 16, 2010, and is the most accurate portrayal of the amended LCP Policies to the best knowledge of the Marin County Community Development Agency at this time. Original LCP Unit I Prepared by: The Marin County Comprehensive Planning Department (1979): Marjorie Macris, AICP Director Allen Meacham Coastal Planner Malcolm Sproul Coastal Planner Liz Scott/Irene Laycock Senior Typist Larry Smith Graphics Carol Horowitz Editor The preparation of this planning document was funded by a grant administered by the Office of Coastal Zone Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972. CZM 78-115. Amended LCP Unit I Prepared by: The Marin County Community Development Agency (2010): Brian Crawford Director Thomas Lai Deputy Director Jack Liebster Principal Planner Kristin Drumm Senior Planner Alisa Stevenson Assistant Planner Don Allee Senior Clerk/Typist TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................v I. PUBLIC ACCESS AND RECREATION ........................................................................................ - 3 - PUBLIC ACCESS................................................................................................................................ - 3 - Existing Public Access ..................................................................................................................... - 3 - Proposed Access ............................................................................................................................... - 5 - • LCP POLICIES ON PUBLIC ACCESS ............................................................................. - 7 - RECREATION AND VISITOR SERVING FACILITIES................................................................ - 11 - • LCP POLICIES ON RECREATION AND VISITOR SERVING FACILITIES ............. - 13 - STATE AND FEDERAL PARKLANDS.......................................................................................... - 14 - • LCP POLICIES ON STATE AND FEDERAL PARKLANDS........................................ - 14 - II. NATURAL RESOURCE PROTECTION.................................................................................... - 15 - STREAM PROTECTION.................................................................................................................. - 15 - Pine Gulch Creek............................................................................................................................ - 15 - Redwood Creek. ............................................................................................................................. - 17 - • LCP POLICIES ON STREAM PROTECTION................................................................ - 19 - LAGOON PROTECTION ................................................................................................................. - 21 - • LCP POLICIES ON LAGOON PROTECTION............................................................... - 25 - DUNE AND SANDY BEACH PROTECTION ................................................................................ - 28 - • LCP POLICIES ON NATURAL DUNE AND SANDY BEACH PROTECTION.......... - 29 - HABITAT PROTECTION................................................................................................................. - 30 - Coastal Communities...................................................................................................................... - 30 - Duxbury Reef ................................................................................................................................. - 31 - • LCP POLICIES ON HABITAT PROTECTION .............................................................. - 34 - AGRICULTURE................................................................................................................................ - 34 - • LCP POLICIES ON AGRICULTURE ............................................................................. - 35 - III. SHORELINE PROTECTION AND HAZARD AREAS........................................................... - 37 - Seacliff Retreat ............................................................................................................................... - 37 - Seismicity ....................................................................................................................................... - 38 - Shoreline Erosion: .......................................................................................................................... - 39 - Protection of Existing Structures and County Liability.................................................................. - 40 - • LCP POLICIES ON SHORELINE PROTECTION AND HAZARD AREAS ................ - 40 - IV. PUBLIC SERVICES AND NEW DEVELOPMENT................................................................. - 44 - PUBLIC SERVICES.......................................................................................................................... - 44 - Water Supply .................................................................................................................................. - 44 - Sewage Disposal............................................................................................................................. - 46 - Transportation................................................................................................................................. - 46 - • LCP POLICIES ON PUBLIC SERVICES........................................................................ - 48 - NEW DEVELOPMENT AND LAND USE ...................................................................................... - 51 - Historical Resources ....................................................................................................................... - 51 - Archaelogical Resources ................................................................................................................ - 56 - Visual Resources ............................................................................................................................ - 56 - Housing........................................................................................................................................... - 56 - Grading ........................................................................................................................................... - 63 - ii • LCP POLICIES ON NEW DEVELOPMENT AND LAND USE.................................... - 64 - LOCATION AND DENSITY OF NEW DEVELOPMENT ............................................................. - 67 - Priority Uses ................................................................................................................................... - 67 - Muir Beach ..................................................................................................................................... - 68 - Stinson Beach ................................................................................................................................. - 68 - Seadrift............................................................................................................................................ - 70 - Bolinas............................................................................................................................................ - 77 - Non-Community Plan Areas........................................................................................................... - 78 - • LCP POLICIES ON LOCATION AND DENSITY OF NEW DEVELOPMENT........... - 78 - APPENDICES...................................................................................................................................... - 86 - iii LIST OF FIGURES Page 1: Unit 1 Local Coastal Program Boundary...............................................................................- 2 - 2: Duxbury Reef Reserve and Extension Area of Special Biological Significance ................- 33 - 3: Concentrations of Low and Moderate Income Housing Units ............................................- 59 - 4: Areas of the Seadrift Subdivision ........................................................................................- 82 - iv LIST OF TABLES Page 1. Location of Moderate Cost Housing Units in the Coastal Zone............. 58 2. Coastal Housing Conditions.............................................................. 58 3. Employment, Housing, Population Forecast........................................ 60 4. Buildout Potential in Stinson Beach..................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Environmental Action Committee of West Marin's Point Reyes Birding
    Environmental Action Committee of West Marin’s Point Reyes Birding and Nature Festival Thursday, April 25th, 2019 Class Description 1. Special Keynote Thursday Outing & Lunch: Since the late 1990s, most of his attention has gone into the Kaufman Field Birding with the Kingbird Kenn Kaufman & Signed Book Guides. Countless hours in the field doing research and photography are Thursday, April 25, 2019 | 8:30 am – 1:00 pm followed up with countless hours of writing, editing, and design work, Difficulty/Length: Easy, 2-4 miles collaborating with experts in each subJect to ensure the highest quality in the Experience Levels/Ages: All finished books. Ticket Price: $175 | 16 participants Aside from the field guides, Kenn's best-known book is Kingbird Highway. Join author and well-known birder Kenn Kaufman and popular naturalist Published by Houghton Mifflin in 1997, it has become something of a cult David Wimpfheimer for this special morning of birding. We will sample several classic, especially among young birders. It tells the story of his adventures as a habitats as we travel from the wetlands of Tomales Bay to the interior teenager in the 1970s, thumbing rides all over North America in an obsessive search for birds. grasslands and oak woodlands near the town of Nicasio. In each habitat there will be different birds that we will learn about and identify by field marks and their vocalizations. From teal and yellowlegs to raptors, Lazuli buntings and Event Location: Various location around West Marin. Lark sparrows we will enJoy a large diversity of species. With any luck we may even see a kingbird, an iconic bird for Kenn.
    [Show full text]
  • COASTAL CONSERVANCY Staff Recommendation September 20
    COASTAL CONSERVANCY Staff Recommendation September 20, 2007 PINE GULCH CREEK WATERSHED ENHANCEMENT: INSTREAM FLOW ENHANCEMENT PROJECT File No. 07-081 Project Manager: Michael Bowen RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorization to disburse up to $275,000 to the Marin Resource Conservation District to prepare the final design and permits for water-storage ponds in order to conserve water and protect anadromous fish in Pine Gulch Creek, a tributary to the Bolinas Lagoon, in Marin County. LOCATION: Pine Gulch Creek, a tributary to Bolinas Lagoon, Marin County (Exhibit 1) PROGRAM CATEGORY: Resource Enhancement EXHIBITS Exhibit 1: Project location and site map Exhibit 2: Initial Study Exhibit 3: Letters of Support RESOLUTION AND FINDINGS: Staff recommends that the State Coastal Conservancy adopt the following resolution pursuant to Sections 31251-31270 of the Public Resources Code: The State Coastal Conservancy hereby authorizes the disbursement of an amount not to exceed two hundred seventy-five thousand dollars ($275,000) to the Marin Resource Conservation District, for the preparation of final design and permits for water-storage facilities to assist in the conservation of water and the protection and enhancement of anadromous fish in Pine Gulch Creek, a tributary to the Bolinas Lagoon, in Marin County. Prior to the disbursement of Conservancy funds for the project, the Executive Officer of the Conservancy shall approve in writing a final work program, including schedule and budget, and any contractors to be employed for the project. Staff further recommends that the Conservancy adopt the following findings: “Based on the accompanying staff report and attached exhibits, the State Coastal Page 1 of 10 PINE GULCH CREEK WATERSHED ENHANCEMENT: INSTREAM FLOW ENHANCEMENT Conservancy hereby finds that: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Stormwater Management Plan
    MARIN COUNTY STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PROGRAM ACTION PLAN 2010 Stormwater Management Plan Fiscal Years 2005-2006 through 2009-2010 MARIN COUNTY STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PROGRAM Stormwater Management Plan ACTION PLAN 2010 Fiscal Years 2005-2006 through 2009-2010 May 2005 EOA, Inc. PRODUCED FOR MARIN COUNTY STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PROGRAM (MCSTOPPP) MARIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS P.O. BOX 4186 SAN RAFAEL, CA 94913-4186 415-499-6528 415-499-3799 (FAX) www.mcstoppp.org PRODUCED BY EOA, Inc. 1410 JACKSON STREET OAKLAND, CA 94612 510-832-2852 For more information, contact the MCSTOPPP Countywide Program at the numbers listed above. May 2005 EOA, Inc. CREDITS This report is being submitted by the member agencies of the City of Belvedere Town of Corte Madera County of Marin Town of Fairfax City of Larkspur City of Mill Valley City of Novato Town of Ross Town of San Anselmo City of San Rafael City of Sausalito Town of Tiburon Marin County Flood Control District Implementation coordinated by: Marin County Department of Public Works With input and direction from the Citizens Advisory Committee: Carole D’Alessio, Jean Bonander, Stan Griffin, Kathy Lowrey, Linda Novy, Kristine Pillsbury, Aaron Stessman Report Prepared by: EOA, Inc. (Eisenberg, Olivieri, & Associates) ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Credits ii List of Tables and Figures iv Acronyms and Abbreviations v Definitions vi EXECUTIVE ES-1 SUMMARY Executive Summary CHAPTER ONE Protecting and Enhancing Marin 1 County’s Watersheds CHAPTER TWO Local Government Leads the Way
    [Show full text]
  • Pine Gulch Creek Instream Flow Enhancement Report
    Public Report: PINE GULCH CREEK INSTREAM FLOW ENHANCEMENT PROJECT Grant Agreement # P1130410 Prepared for The California Department of Fish and Wildlife Prepared by Marin Resource Conservation District Point Reyes Station, California December 20, 2015 Front page photo credits from left to right go to Nancy Scolari, Casey Del Real and Elise Suronen. Pine Gulch Creek Elise Suronen, Marin RCD Table of Contents Accomplishments ............................................................................................................................................................... 2 Start & End Dates ................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Geographic Area .................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Location of Work ................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Total Volunteer Hours ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 Project Benefits to Anadromous Salmonids ............................................................................................................ 1 Location of Work for the Pine Gulch Creek Instream Flow Enhancement Project .................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bolinas Lagoon Ecosystem Restoration Feasibility Project Final
    Bolinas Lagoon Ecosystem Restoration Feasibility Project Final Public Reports V Project Reformulation Advisory Committee Summary of Draft Public Report PRAG Committee MEMORANDUM May 23, 2006 TO: Bolinas Lagoon Technical Advisory Committee FROM: Project Reformulation Advisory Committee: Gary Page – Point Reyes Bird Observatory Tom Moore – California Department of Fish and Game Gwen Heistand – Audubon Canyon Ranch Roberto Anima – United States Geological Survey William Carmen – Project Manager, Carmen Ecological Consulting SUBJECT: Summary of Examination of Report Entitled: “Projecting the Future Evolution of Bolinas Lagoon” and Supporting Documents RECOMMENDATION: The Project Reformulation Advisory Group (PRAG) recommends that the report entitled “Projecting the Future Evolution of Bolinas Lagoon” and its supporting documents be recommended by the Bolinas Lagoon Technical Advisory Committee (BLTAC) for acceptance by the Marin County Open Space District Board of Directors. SUMMARY: The PRAG has examined the report entitled “Projecting the Future Evolution of Bolinas Lagoon”, its supporting documents, and the questions concerning the Report’s analyses and conclusions. The PRAG finds that the report fulfills its purpose as a scientific projection of past, present, and future conditions of Bolinas Lagoon, given the uncertainties inherent in assessing past and future conditions in a complex natural ecosystem. FINDINGS: The remainder of this memorandum summarizes the PRAG’s key findings concerning the following elements of the report: A) the Conceptual Model, B) Tectonics, Dynamic Equilibrium(s), the 1854 Map, and the “Pristine Condition”, C) Sediment Accumulation and Tidal Prism Loss, D) Inlet Closure, E) Habitat and Wildlife Changes, and F) Anthropogenic Changes. For the remainder of this memorandum, the subject report will be referred to as the “PWA (Philip Williams Associates) Report” or “the report”.
    [Show full text]
  • Pine.Gulch Permits
    ' Marin County Community Development Agency Alex Hinds, Director NOTICE OF DECISION Applicant's Name: Pine Gultch Enhancement Project Application (type and number): Coastal Permit (CP 03-4) and Design Review Clearance (DC03-24) Assessor's Parcel Number: 188-090-15, 188-150-69, 188-170-45 and 193-010-19 Project Location: Assorted addresses generally located west of Olema-Bolinas Road For inquiries, please contact: Jeremy Tejirian Decision Date: November 15, 2007 DETERMINATION: Approved with Conditions M((]utes of the November 15, 2007, Deputy Zoning Administrator's hearing are attached specifying action and applicable conditions 1-17. Marin County Community Development Agency ~anna Patri !{_aring Officer DZAMinutes dza/minutes/11115/0?doc November 15, 2007 H2. A &BPage22 < ' H2. A. NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: PINE GULTCH ENHANCEMENT PROJECT . B. PINE GULTCH ENHANCEMENT PROJECT COASTAL PERMIT {CP 03-4) AND DESIGN REVIEW CLEARANCE {DC 03-24) Hearing proposing to construct a total of five off-stream water storage ponds on the subject properties. The project sites are generally located west of Olema­ Bolinas Road near Bolinas Lagoon in Bolinas, CA. The location, number, size and capacity of the ponds are summarized in the table below. Number of Pond Site ponds to Proposed Pond Site/ Pond Surface Operation/ Owner Assessor's Parcel/ Meet Water Storage Capacity Area Address Storage Need pond 1A pond 1A Fresh Run Farms (+Tank) 0.7 acre (Martinelli Family) 2 20.5 acre-ft . 3.5 acre-ft APN 188-090~15 pond 1B pond 1B (615 Paradise 17 acre-ft 1.3 acres Valley Road) Paradise Valley Farm pond 2 pond 2 (New Land Fund) 1 5.5 acre-ft APN 188-150-69 5.5 acre-ft 0.83 acre (235 Paradise Valley Road) APN 188-170-45 Star Route Farms pond 3B pond'"3B (850 Lauff Ranch (Warren Weber) 9.4 acre-ft 1 acre Road) 2 35.4 acre-ft Pond 3A Pond 3A APN 193-010-19 26 acre-ft 2.7 acres (95 Olema-Bolinas Road) In response to the Hearing Officer, staff summarized the letters received since the issuance of the staff report.
    [Show full text]
  • Adult Salmon Escapement Monitoring Program Summary 2009-2010
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Adult Salmon Escapement Monitoring Program Summary 2009-2010 Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SFAN/NRDS—2010-116 ON THE COVER Fisheries biologist Michael Reichmuth (San Francisco Bay Area Network Inventory and Monitoring Program), measuring a coho redd on Redwood Creek during the 2009-2010 spawner season. Photograph by: Katie Booth. Adult Salmon Escapement Monitoring Program Summary 2009-2010 Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SFAN/NRDS—2010-116 Sarah Carlisle Point Reyes National Seashore Association, Coho and Steelhead Monitoring Project 1 Bear Valley Road Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 Angela Rodoni Conservation Corps North Bay 1 Bear Valley Road Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 Allison Dedrick Point Reyes National Seashore Association, Coho and Steelhead Monitoring Project 1 Bear Valley Road Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 Michael Reichmuth National Park Service, San Francisco Bay Area Network Inventory and Monitoring Program Point Reyes National Seashore, 1 Bear Valley Road Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 December 2010 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado i The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Data Series is intended for timely release of basic data sets and data summaries. Care has been taken to assure accuracy of raw data values, but a thorough analysis and interpretation of the data has not been completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Bolinas Lagoon Ecosystem Restoration Feasibility Project Final
    Bolinas Lagoon Ecosystem Restoration Feasibility Project Final Public Reports II Projecting the Future of Bolinas Lagoon 3KLOLS:LOOLDPV $VVRFLDWHV/WG :HWODQG5HVHDUFK$VVRFLDWHV PROJECTING THE FUTURE EVOLUTION OF BOLINAS LAGOON Final Public Draft Prepared for Marin County Open Space District with funding from The California Coastal Conservancy Prepared by Philip Williams & Associates, Ltd. with WRA, Inc. July 2006 PWA REF. # 1686.02 July 2006 Services provided pursuant to this Agreement are intended solely for the use and benefit of the Marin County Open Space District. No other person or entity shall be entitled to rely on the services, opinions, recommendations, plans or specifications provided pursuant to this agreement without the express written consent of Philip Williams & Associates, Ltd., 720 California Street, 6th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94108. P:\Projects\1686.02_BolinasLagoonERP-Phase2b\Task08_Reporting\PublicDraft_07.06\Bolinas_FinalPublicDraft_July2006.doc July 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 3 2.1 Summary of Key Findings 3 2.2 Specific Conclusions 4 3. PAST EVOLUTION OF BOLINAS LAGOON 9 3.1 Sediment Budget, Sediment Dynamics and Equilibrium Form 9 3.2 Natural Evolution of Bolinas Lagoon 12 3.2.1 Evolution over Geologic Time and the Role of Large Earthquakes 12 3.2.2 Mechanisms of Sediment Delivery 13 3.2.3 Relative Magnitudes of Littoral and Alluvial Sources 16 3.2.4 The Tidal Inlet and Estuarine Processes 16 3.2.5 Ecological Response to Changing Physical Conditions 17 3.3 19th Century Lagoon Conditions 18 3.3.1 Conditions Prior to Significant Disturbances 18 3.3.2 Land Use Changes in the 19th Century 21 3.4 The 1906 Earthquake and Its Effects On Sediment Delivery 22 3.4.1 Subsidence During the 1906 Earthquake 22 3.4.2 20th Century Sedimentation Rates and Sources 26 3.4.3 Accelerated Tidal Dispersion of Littoral Sediments 27 3.5 Recent Changes to Lagoon Morphology 29 3.5.1 Sediment Accumulation and Marsh Expansion 29 3.5.2 Artificial Fill 33 3.6 Historic Changes To Tidal Prism 33 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Bolinas Lagoon Ecosystem Restoration Project Draft Feasibility Study Marin County, California
    Bolinas Lagoon Ecosystem Restoration Project Draft Feasibility Study Marin County, California, June 2002 VOLUME I Draft Feasability Study Executive Summary List of Acronyms 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Problems, Needs and Opportunities 3.0 Study Area Description 4.0 Plan Formulation: Possible Solutions 5.0 Plan Evaluation 6.0 Plan Comparison 7.0 Recommendations: The Selected Plans 8.0 Plan Implementation 9.0 Public Involvement and Agency Coordination 10.0 Conclusions and Recommendations 11.0 List of Preparers DRAFT EIS/EIR (available as a separate volume for the KRIS edition ) Bolinas Lagoon Ecosystem Restoration Project Draft Feasibility Study Marin County, California EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 Introduction The Bolinas Lagoon Ecosystem Restoration Feasibility Study, which was prepared by the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and the non-Federal sponsor Marin County Open Space District (MCOSD), identifies a feasible project to restore nearly 600 acres of subtidal and intertidal habitat in Bolinas Lagoon by removing approximately 1.5 million cubic yards (cy) of sediment. The purpose of this study is to identify the problem in Bolinas Lagoon, identify the opportunities for restoration and constraints to project development, develop planning objectives for the study, and develop a solution that addresses those planning objectives. The overall goal of the project is to find viable alternatives that provide long term benefits to the lagoon ecosystem while minimizing adverse, short term impacts. 2.0 Measures and Alternatives Considered Restoration measures considered in this study include wet sediment dredging and dry sediment excavation activities in the North Basin, Main Channel, Pine Gulch Creek Delta, Kent Island, Bolinas Channel, Highway One Fill Areas, South Lagoon Channel, Dipsea Road and Seadrift Lagoon.
    [Show full text]
  • Bolinas Lagoon Watershed Study Input Sediment Budget
    _____________________________________________________________________________ Bolinas Lagoon Watershed Study Input Sediment Budget _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ Prepared For: Prepared By: US Army Corps of Engineers Tetra Tech, Inc. 333 Market Street 180 Howard Street, Suite 250 San Francisco, CA 94105 San Francisco, CA 94105 November 2001 List of Contributors Bolinas Lagoon Watershed Study LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS Paul Bigelow Geologist/Geomorphologist George Bowie Senior Environmental Engineer Connie Callahan Deputy Project Manager Clayton Creager Senior Watershed Scientist Yashekia Evans GIS Specialist Jared Gerstein Ecologist/Environmental Scientist Tatjana Gruner GIS Specialist Katherine Hancock Environmental Engineer Jeremie Maehr Environmental Engineer Mike Manka Project Manager/Ecologist Mary Matthews GIS Specialist Lora Richards Technical Editor Tom Whitehead Hydrogeologist Page i Table of Contents Bolinas Lagoon Watershed Study TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 1-1 2. BACKGROUND................................................................................................. 2-3 2.1. History of Bolinas Lagoon ...........................................................................................2-3 2.2. Hydrology and Groundwater........................................................................................2-5
    [Show full text]
  • Marin Estuary Data Summary Report Vf
    Assessment of Select Estuaries of Marin County Summary Data Report Rodeo Valley Lagoon Prepared for: San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board by: Central Coast Wetlands Group Moss Landing Marine Labs 8272 Moss Landing Rd. Moss Landing, CA 95039 July 2018 Summary Data Report: Estuaries of Marin County Table of Contents BACKGROUND AND NEED 2 WHAT ARE BBES AND WHY ARE THEY IMPORTANT 2 ESTUARINE RESOURCES ON THE COASTLINE OF RB2 3 PURPOSE 5 METHODS 6 SITE SELECTION 6 EXISTING PLANS AND REPORTS 6 WETLAND HABITAT CONDITION 7 WATERSHED STRESSORS 7 WETLAND HABITAT CHANGE 7 SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES 8 RESULTS 9 CRAM SURVEY RESULTS 9 INDEX AND ATTRIBUTE SCORES 9 CRAM STRESSORS 12 CO-DOMINANT PLANT SPECIES 14 WETLAND HABITAT CHANGE 15 SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES IN BBES 16 GENERAL SITE INFORMATION 18 INFORMATION: BAR-BUILT ESTUARIES 18 HORSESHOE POND AND DRAKES BEACH 18 REDWOOD CREEK/BIG LAGOON/MUIR BEACH 19 RODEO VALLEY LAGOON 21 TENNESSEE VALLEY LAGOON 22 INFORMATION: PERENNIAL ESTUARIES 23 TOMALES BAY 23 DRAKES ESTERO 28 BOLINAS LAGOON 31 CREEK MOUTH-PINE GULCH CREEK 33 1 Summary Data Report: Select Estuaries of Marin County Background and Need Drakes Beach What are BBEs and Why are they Important Bar-built Estuaries, also termed river mouth lagoons, bar-built lagoons, coastal river mouths and coastal confluences, are the terminus of creek and river mouths that flow to the coast, yet close to ocean influence periodically through the formation of a sand bar or barrier beach (Figure 1). These bar-built estuaries represent an important and unique subset (279 out of 576 of coastal confluences within California.
    [Show full text]