Green Guides = Your Guide Agenda

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Green Guides = Your Guide Agenda 1/7/2013 Green Guides = Your Guide (for Environmental Marketing and Product Responsibility) By Tonia Ho, MAS Agenda • What is Green? • What are the FTC Green Guides? • What are the revisions and updates? • How do they protect you and your clients? 1 1/7/2013 What is Green? What is the claim for green? How is it perceived by the consumer? What does it mean? Is it specific? Source: holcombe‐cottages.co.uk There is no clear answer, thus the FTC stepped in….. Green Guides Basics –Consumer Perception • Tell the truth. How do consumers understand claims? (covered under Sec. 5 FTC ACT) • Have substantiation for all express and implied claims, as marketers are responsible for both that may lack clear and specific information. Source: Julia Wright, MAS Green Guides Basics ‐ Protect the Consumer Objective to ensure truth in advertising • Consumer reach: – business to consumer – business to business • Applies to ALL forms of marketing claims – Packaging and labeling – Advertising – Promotional materials – In any medium (broadcast, POP, online, etc.) The guides are NOT to offer performance standards or ecolabels. 2 1/7/2013 General Environmental Benefit Claims • CONSUMER PERCEPTION CONTROLS: Marketers should not make broad, unqualified general environmental benefit claims. They are difficult, if not impossible, to substantiate. • BE SPECIFIC: Qualifications should be clear, prominent and specific. Marketers should qualify the general claims with specific environmental benefits to minimize consumer deception. – OVERSTATEMENT OF ATTRIBUTES ‐ Small or unimportant benefits should not be highlighted as consumers interpret benefits to be significant. – NO NEGATIVE IMPACT?? ‐ If the benefit is a result of a specific attribute, marketers should also analyze the tradeoffs resulting from the attribute to prove the claim. What claim is being made? Environmental Claims Updated and new sections include the following: • Certifications and seals of approval • Non‐toxic • Carbon offsets • Degradable • Made with renewable energy claims • Compostable • Made with renewable materials claims • Recyclable • Ozone safe and Ozone friendly • Recycled content • Source reduction • Refillable • Free‐of claims 3 1/7/2013 Certifications and Seals of Approval Certifications and seals may be endorsements according to the FTC Endorsement Guides: • Marketers should disclose any material connections to the certifying organization, which can affect the credibility of the endorsement. • Seals must clearly convey the basis for certification, as the seals are also likely to convey the general environmental bfbenefits. • If not, the seals should identify, clearly and prominently, specific environmental benefits (otherwise risk implied claims). • Third‐party certification does not eliminate a marketer’s obligation to have substantiation for all conveyed claims. Trans‐Mate is proud to offer a line of earth‐friendly Envrio‐ Mate products by Trans‐Mate are formulated with environmentally‐friendly ingredients that provide superior performance at an affordable price. Certifications and Seals of Approval • According to www.ecolabelindex.com – there are currently 432 ecolabels in 197countries. • 4 Ecolabels in the US and 16 in Canada ildiincluding: LiLeaping Bunny, Non‐GMO (Canada), USDA and Canada Organic, Energy Star/Energy efficient. Our Industry Certifications USDA Organic: Organic is a labeling term that indicates that the food or other agricultural product has been produced through approved methods that integrate cultural, biological, and mechanical practices that foster recycling of resources, promote ecological balance, and conserve biodiversity. Synthetic fertilizers, sewage sludge, irradiation, and genetic engineering may not be used. QCA: Quality Certification Alliance is an independent, accreditation organization whose mission is to elevate the standards by which industry firms that import and/or manufacture promotional products provide consistently safe, high‐quality, socially compliant and environmentally conscientious merchandise. FSC: Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification is a voluntary, market‐based tool that supports responsible forest management worldwide. FSC certified forest products are verified from the forest of origin through the supply chain. The FSC label ensures that the forest products used are from resppyonsibly harvested and verified sources. SFI: The Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) 2010‐2014 Standard promotes sustainable forest management in North America through 14 core principles that promote sustainable forest management, including measures to protect water quality, biodiversity, wildlife habitat, species at risk, and Forests with Exceptional Conservation Value. GOTS: The Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS) is the worldwide leading textile processing standard for organic fibers, including ecological and social criteria, backed up by independent certification of the entire textile supply chain. SEARCH THESE IN SAGE! 4 1/7/2013 Certifications in Sage Dropdown box listing different standards – TSA, CPSIA, GOTS, etc. Caution not verified! QCA Carbon Offsets and Renewable Energy Marketers should employ competent and reliable scientific and accounting methods to properly quantify claimed emission reductions and to ensure that they do not sell the same reduction more than one time. It is deceptive to misrepresent that a carbon offset represents emission reductions that have already occurred or will occur in the immediate future. To avoid deception, marketers should clearly and prominently disclose if the carbon offset represents emission reductions that will not occur for at least two years. It is deceptive to claim that a carbon offset represents an emission reduction if the reduction, or the activity that caused the reduction, was required by law. Carbon Offsets and Renewable Energy 5 1/7/2013 Carbon Offsets and Renewable Energy Carbon offset and carbon footprint calculators exist for the following: ‐ Air travel ‐ Shipping (i.e. EPA Smartway Shipper Program) ‐ CarbonFund.org Made with Renewable Energy • Marketers must purchase RECs (Renewable Energy Certificates) to match energy use from fossil fuels for unqualified energy claims. • They should specify the source of renewable energy clearly and prominently (i.e. wind or solar energy) to minimize consumer risk of misunderstanding. • “Made with renewable energy claim” may be used only if all, or virtually all, the significant manufacturing processes involved are powered with renewable energy or non‐renewable energy matched by RECs. • Marketers who generate renewable energy AND sell RECs for what they generate should not claim they “use” renewable energy. Promote renewable energy and empower people's hearts and minds with positive messages that show This retractable ballpoint pen has a shiny you're doing your part to help our planet's future. Our surface, available in transparent or opaque exclusive scale model Hybrid e.Turbine Fans generate a plastics. Equipped with refill 774. Green cool breeze and draw attention to get noticed. Solar certified through EMAS (EU ecological audit model requires sunshine or equivalent to power a small regulation) and ISO 14001. Produced with motor that spins the turbine's blades. Popular Hybrid 100% renewable energies and PVC free. e.Turbines perfectly connect energy conservation with your promotions in the coolest way! Made with Renewable Materials • Renewable material unqualified claims may imply that a product is recyclable, made with recycled content, or biodegradable. • They should specify the source of renewable material clearly and prominently and explain why it is renewable to minimize consumer risk of misunderstanding. • Marketers should also qualify any “made with renewable materials” claim unless the product or package (excluding minor, incidental components) is made entirely with renewable materials. 6 1/7/2013 Source Reduction Marketers should qualify a claim that a product or package is lower in weight, volume, or toxicity clearly and prominently to avoid deception about the amount of reduction and the basis for comparison. For example: “product generates 10% less waste” vs. the claim “product generates 10% less waste than our previous product.” Free‐Of Claims Marketers can make a free‐of claim for a product that contains some amount of a substance if: ‐ Product doesn’t have more than trace amounts or background levels of the substance ‐ Amount of substance present doesn’t cause harm associated with the substance ‐ Substance wasn’t added intentionally to the product The free‐of claim would be deceptive if replaced with another substance that poses a similar environmental risk. It may be deceptive to claim a product is “free‐of” a substance if it never was associated with that prodtduct category to bibegin with. Approximately 4500 products resulted in a BPA‐Free search in SAGE while 6700 products resulted in a search for lead‐free. 16 oz double wall insulated acrylic tumbler with straw. The double wall insulation in this tumbler is perfect for keeping your beverages hot or cold without impacting your grip. Includes a 9" straw with stopper so it won't fall out of the cup. Hand wash only, do not microwave. BPA and lead free, Prop 65 compliant. Measures: 4" x 6". They look disposable, but they are in fact reusable and incredibly stylish. Free‐Of Claims One Example from the FTC: A package of t‐shirts is labeled “Shirts made with a chlorine‐free bleaching process.” The shirts, however, are bleached with a process that releases a reduced, but
Recommended publications
  • Climate of Deception
    CLIMATE OF DECEPTION WHY ELECTRICITY CONSUMERS WHO CARE ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING AND AIR POLLUTION NEED FTC PROTECTION FROM BIOMASS INDUSTRY GREENWASHING Kelly Bitov, Esq. Mary S. Booth, PhD Partnership for Policy Integrity July 29, 2014 CLIMATE OF DECEPTION WHY ELECTRICITY CONSUMERS WHO CARE ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING AND AIR POLLUTION NEED FTC PROTECTION FROM BIOMASS INDUSTRY GREENWASHING Kelly Bitov, Esq. Mary S. Booth, PhD Partnership for Policy Integrity July 29, 2013 PFPI gratefully acknowledges the support of The Heinz Endowments, The Blanchette Hooker Rockefeller Fund, The Threshold Foundation, and The Civil Society Institute in supporting this work. 2 PFPI AUTHORS Kelly Bitov is an attorney with PFPI specializing in environmental law. She has worked for the General Counsel to the Investors Environmental Health Network, the Sierra Club and, the U.S. Department of Justice Environmental Enforcement Section in Washington D.C. Bitov received her law degree from Northeastern University School of Law, and also holds a Masters Degree in Public Health from Tufts University School of Medicine and B.A. in Political Science from Barnard College. Dr. Mary Booth, PhD, is Director of the Partnership for Policy Integrity (PFPI). A former senior scientist at Environmental Working Group, she founded PFPI in 2010. By training an ecosystem scientist, Dr. Booth now specializes in analysis of bioenergy projects, including forest impacts and emissions of greenhouse gases and other air pollutants. Dr. Booth received her PhD in Ecology from Utah State University and her Masters and Bachelors degrees from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst. CONSULTANT Sanford Lewis is an attorney who represents investment and nongovernmental organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenwashing the Organic Label: Abusive Green Marketing in an Increasingly Eco-Friendly Marketplace
    Journal of Food Law & Policy Volume 7 Number 1 Article 6 2011 Greenwashing the Organic Label: Abusive Green Marketing in an Increasingly Eco-Friendly Marketplace Greg Northen Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uark.edu/jflp Part of the Administrative Law Commons, Agency Commons, Consumer Protection Law Commons, Food and Drug Law Commons, Legislation Commons, Litigation Commons, and the Marketing Law Commons Recommended Citation Northen, G. (2021). Greenwashing the Organic Label: Abusive Green Marketing in an Increasingly Eco- Friendly Marketplace. Journal of Food Law & Policy, 7(1). Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uark.edu/ jflp/vol7/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Food Law & Policy by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GREENWASHING THE ORGANIC LABEL: ABUSIVE GREEN MARKETING IN AN INCREASINGLY ECO-FRIENDLY MARKETPLACE Greg Northen* I. INTRODUCTION .................................... ....... 102 II. GREENWASHING IN TODAY'S MARKETPLACE.. ............... 105 A. Growing Consumer Awareness of Corporate Greenwash .......... 108 B. The 2010 Green Guide Update - Is It Enough?.... ...... 110 1. Increased Governmental Awareness .. ............... 112 2. The Green Guides' Current Update ....... ........ 114 a. Proposed Additions to Currently Regulated Claims 115 b. Proposed Regulations for New Claims ................... 116 c. Claims Not Included in the Updated Guides......... 117 C. The CaliforniaApproach to Green Guide Enforcement ........... 119 D. A Friendly Warning to Corporate Greenwashers: Eco-fraud Litigation ................................ 121 III. GREENWASHING'S SPILLOVER EFFECT: OVERUSING "ORGANIC" IN TODAY'S FOOD INDUSTRY... ............................ 123 A. The National Organic Program ............. .......... 124 B. And What About "Natural?" .................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Compliance Alert, Issue No. 655 – August 2, 2021
    August 2, 2021 Who’s getting nailed for WHAT’S INSIDE ‘greenwashing’ the public? n False claims lead to egg on face for companies 2 Sharpen Your Judgment Is firm’s water permit at risk ike any environmental pro, (Poland Spring and Deer Park) and if citizens’ group sues? Lyou want to tout your facility’s Niagara Bottling. sustainability bona fides. At least 28% of their bottle content 3 Who Got Fined & Why Whether it’s an electric vehicle (made with PET or No. 1 plastic) is Pesticide scam artist escapes program ... or a switch from a toxic “unrecyclable due to contamination prison but not big fines chemical ... or finding new ways to and processing loss,” while the labels re-use waste ... these are the kinds are made from biaxially-oriented of initiatives your customers and the polypropylene (No. 5 plastic), which 4 Air Quality general public want to hear about. isn’t recyclable. Early look at Risk Management Just be careful how your sales Plan changes to come and marketing pros toot their horns! Federal ‘Green Guides’ a must-read Claims of being “green” or “100% The Sierra Club’s suing the firms 5 Water & Waste News recyclable” can backfire – badly. for misleading consumers under Groundwater lawsuits are California’s Environmental Marketing facing the Maui test ‘65% or thereabouts’ recyclable? Claims Act. Case in point: The Sierra Club is Companies that manufacture 6 Enviro Regs Update suing three beverage manufacturers and sell in any state can be that label their plastic bottles as 100% fined – and suffer bad publicity Paper hazardous waste recyclable – Coca-Cola (bottler of manifests being phased out Dasani water), BlueTriton Brands (Please see Who’s … on Page 2) FRACKING 8 Update on Federal Rules PFAS chemicals reportable to Fed freeze on oil & gas drilling takes hit in court Chemical Data Exchange n OIL STATES PUSHING HARD TO Texas, Utah and West Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Ecolabels Influence Firms' Sustainability Strategy And
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286001133 Can Ecolabels Influence Firms’ Sustainability Strategy and Stakeholder Behavior? ARTICLE in ORGANIZATION & ENVIRONMENT · DECEMBER 2014 Impact Factor: 1.39 · DOI: 10.1177/1086026614562963 CITATION READS 1 10 2 AUTHORS: Nicole Darnall Arizona State University 46 PUBLICATIONS 1,442 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE J. Alberto Aragon-Correa University of Surrey 62 PUBLICATIONS 1,345 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Available from: Nicole Darnall Retrieved on: 20 January 2016 OAEXXX10.1177/1086026614562963<italic>Organization & Environment</italic>Darnall and Aragón-Correa 562963research-article2014 Guest Collaborative Editorial Organization & Environment 2014, Vol. 27(4) 319 –327 Can Ecolabels Influence Firms’ © 2014 SAGE Publications Reprints and permissions: Sustainability Strategy and sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/1086026614562963 Stakeholder Behavior? oae.sagepub.com Nicole Darnall1 and J. Alberto Aragón-Correa2 Abstract Ecolabels are policies and programs that are designed to signal information to stakeholders about a product’s attributes and reduce stakeholder uncertainty about the validity of green product claims. However, for ecolabels to be successful at addressing information asymmetries external stakeholders must perceive them as being credible. We assess the prospects of different sorts of ecolabels to influence firms’ sustainability strategies and stakeholder behavior based on the credibility of their institutional construction. We then describe important areas for future ecolabel research, and analyze connections between these future research areas and the articles that form this issue. Finally, we emphasizethe importance of collaborative stakeholder initiatives in advancing sustainability strategy and how accurate information is vital to the success of these initiatives. Keywords ecolabels, stakeholders, environmental information, certification, collaboration, editorial Imagine shopping for a new cell phone.
    [Show full text]
  • EPA's Smart Steps to Sustainability 2.0 Guide
    • UPDATED & FULLY DIGITAL FOR SMALL BUSINESSES! SMART STEPS TO SUSTAINABILITY 2.0 Office of Small Business Programs, Asbestos & Small Business Ombudsman Develop a sustainability plan specifically for your small business needs. Move beyond environmental compliance and into sustainable practice. WE LISTENED Thinking Small Business First: Professionalism, Innovation, Collaboration, Advocacy. The mission of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Small Business Programs is to support the protection of human health and the environment by advocating and advancing the business, regulatory, and environmental compliance con- cerns of small and socio-economically disadvantaged businesses. Guide Overview \This Smart Steps to Sustainability’s 2.0 Guide is an updated and condensed version of the original 70-page Smart Steps to Sustainability Guide published by EPA’s Small Business Office in 2009. It is intended to help small businesses move beyond environmental compliance and into sustainable practices by providing awareness, understanding and resources to help develop sustainability goals. This guide is intended to provide the small business community with an up-to-date, streamlined and more efficient resource for busy, small business owners to help green their business. To get your business on the fast track to sustainability, this greening guide will help you: REALIZE UNDERSTAND EXPLORE DEVELOP the impact the political and opportunities and implement your business regulatory forces to help your a strategy to has on the that are encouraging business to minimize your environment. sustainable business become more impact and share your practices. sustainable. efforts with your customers. Small Business Environmental Compliance Assistance Don’t miss this helpful online resource in complying with environmental regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • A Producer-Led Framework to Assess Water Sustainability in Agriculture: the NISA Example
    A Producer-Led Framework to Assess Water Sustainability in Agriculture: The NISA Example Jed Colquhoun University of Wisconsin Madison, Wisconsin [email protected] The trajectory of human population growth is often in stark contrast with decreasing natural resources needed to support that population. The national and global needs for food, feed, fiber and energy continue to increase relative to water availability and provide a prime example of increasing demands on limited resources. Similar resource constraints have been observed in industrial sustainability, hence the commonly used saying, “measurement equals management.” Unlike industrial efforts, agriculture has largely failed in “measurement” efforts, and, as such, it has proven difficult to capture and communicate changes in economic, environmental and social sustainability over time. The National Initiative for Sustainable Agriculture (NISA) provides a reasonable mechanism for agricultural producers to document advancements along the sustainability continuum and communicate improvements in resource use, such as water, throughout the supply chain. Challenges in Assessing Agricultural Sustainability A Case Study: Wisconsin Central Sands Region Water and Agriculture The central sands region of Wisconsin provides a prime example of an evolving agricultural production system in public conflict over a critical input resource: water. Wisconsin ranks second among US states for processing vegetable harvested acreage and production, and third in processing vegetable production value, the majority of which is grown in the central sands region. Common processing vegetable crops in the area include potatoes, sweet corn, green beans, green peas, carrots, cucumbers and onions. Overall, specialty crop value, including process, contributes about $.4 billion to the state’s economic activity and accounts for nearly 3,000 jobs (Keene and Mitchell, 00).
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Law Update
    The Official Newsletter of the Agricultural Law Update A nonprofit, professional organization focusing on the legal issues affecting agriculture throughout the United States for over 29 years. VOLUME 26, NUMBER 8, WHOLE NUMBER 309 August 2009 Agricultural Law Update REGULATORY UPDATE – FTC SEEKS INPUT ON GREEN The official newsletter of the American MARKETING GUIDES Agricultural Law Association by Tom Redick* Editor Linda Grim McCormick Growing public and regulatory attention to global warming, energy conservation and other sustainability issues is leading consumers and investors to demand more information about the environmental impacts of products and services. Consumers Agricultural Law Update is published by the American Agricultural Law Association, purchasing products, however, encounter myriad marketing claims promoting Publication office: 37500 Mountain Home Dr., environmental aspects -- “carbon-neutral,” “sustainable,” “environmentally preferred,” Brownsville, OR 97327. Copyright 2009 by “green,” or a range of specialized statements specific to certain sectors (“energy star” American Agricultural Law Association. All for electronics, “natural” or “organic” in food). In the US and the United Kingdom rights reserved. No part of this newsletter may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by (UK) the “green marketing” regulators may invalidate advertising that goes too far any means, electronic or mechanical, including – particularly claims that reach into the stratospheric ideal of “sustainability”. As photocopying, recording,
    [Show full text]
  • Greenwashing and Self-Declared Seafood Ecolabels
    Greenwashing and Self-Declared Seafood Ecolabels Jason J. Czarnezki* Andrew Homan† Meghan Jeans** The credibility and veracity of an environmental claim depends on a high degree of transparency, clarity, and trust. Businesses that utilize ecolabels to market the environmental performance of their seafood products often turn to third-party certifications to minimize the potential for greenwashing and provide a level of verification and independence. Others rely on a riskier approach by developing their own self-declared or first-party ecolabels. Seafood retailers and suppliers considering the creation and use of an ecolabel, certification, or seal to be used in the marketing of seafood products should ensure compliance with applicable Food and Drug Administration and United States Department of Agriculture labeling rules. Furthermore, entities pursuing self-declared or first-party seafood ecolabels should consult the Federal Trade Commission’s Green Guides, closely follow developments in greenwashing litigation under federal and state consumer protection and unfair competition laws, and heed the early advice of legal experts in the field. I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 37 II. FEDERAL REGULATION AND FTC GREEN GUIDES ............................ 39 A. Regulatory Authority over Seafood Labels ........................ 40 B. FTC Green Guides .............................................................. 42 III. LITIGATION ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Global Regulatory Considerations for Green Packaging
    PACKAGING By George G. Misko FTC’s way of putting the industry on Global Regulatory notice as to what it intends to prosecute as an unfair or deceptive act or practice. However, the Green Guides are not laws Considerations for Green or regulations, and do not pre-empt state or local laws on the subject. The Green Guides apply to all forms Packaging of environmental marketing, including labeling, advertising and promotional materials. Besides general environmen- tal claims, the Green Guides address What food companies need carbon offsets, certifications and seals of approval, compostable, degrad- to know to comply with able, ozone-safe and ozone-friendly, recyclable, recycled content, refillable, packaging guidelines renewable energy, renewable materials and source reduction. Additionally, the guides address nontoxic and “free-of” claims that can be relevant food safety claims as well. The final guides do not he global market for green packaging is grow- address organic, sustainable, natural or ing rapidly as consumers, retailers and both bio-based claims. More details on specif- food and consumer product companies seek ic guidelines impacting food packaging to develop products for which they can make are provided below. claims of being “environmentally friendly” General Claims: General environmen- Tor “green.” This growth has prompted several private tal benefit claims should be qualified by organizations to develop standards for green packag- clear and prominent language, limited ing and has also resulted in new or updated regulations to the specific benefit and should not and guidelines that impact the development of green include any deceptive implications. packaging materials or claims made for them.
    [Show full text]
  • Mainstreamgreen-CS5-4.17.11 2.Indd
    Mainstream Green Graceann Bennett & Freya Williams The Red Papers: Mainstream Green: Moving sustainability from niche to normal Graceann Bennett & Freya Williams The Red Papers: Ogilvy The Red Papers: Contents April 2011, No. 4 6 About the Green Gap project 34 Adventures along the green continuum 8 Introduction 64 Turning the corner 12 Closing the Green Gap 74 12 ways we propose to close the gap 18 Researching the Green Gap 92 Comparing the US and China 20 Normal behavior is sustainable behavior 112 Conclusion 24 The massive 116 Research methodology Middle Green 120 Key takeaways 30 The far ends of the continuum The Red Papers: Mainstream Green About the Green Gap project The United States and China arms of OgilvyEarth collaborated on a project that aimed to help crack the code on one of marketing’s thorniest problems. We choose those countries as they are the two largest consuming markets on earth. The problem, dubbed the Green Gap, describes the gap between consumers’ green intentions and green actions. Plenty of research observes that it exists; we set out to understand why, and to discover ways to close it. Bridging the Green Gap is critical to corporate bottom lines and climate trend lines. Kunal Sinha and Michael Griffi ths led the China part of this project, and their fi ndings are presented in Get Going with Green — the companion piece to this work. Graceann Bennett and Freya Williams led the United States project. Both teams collaborated on the comparison section that closes this volume. 6 7 Mainstream Green Introduction An all-star cast of green luminaries fl ocked to December’s World Climate Summit in Cancun, Mexico: CEOs, corporate sustainability offi cers, clean energy consultants, Hollywood producers and even a few of us from OgilvyEarth.
    [Show full text]
  • WI Cranberry School Proceedings | Ii
    WISCONSIN CRANBERRY SCHOOL 2011 PROCEEDINGS Volume 19 January 25-26, 2011 Holiday Inn Hotel & Convention Center Stevens Point, WI Sponsored by: University of Wisconsin-Extension Wisconsin State Cranberry Growers Association Mention of a trade name or a proprietary product does not constitute warranty of the product and does not imply approval of the material to the exclusion of similar products that may be equally suitable. This publication was compiled and edited by: Rebecca M. Harbut Extension Fruit Specialist Department of Horticulture University of Wisconsin-Madison The Proceedings of the 2011 Wisconsin Cranberry School (Volume 19) and the Annual Report of the Wisconsin State Cranberry Growers Association were published by: Wisconsin State Cranberry Growers Association P.O. Box 365 Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54494 (715) 423-2070 Madison, Wisconsin April 2011 2011 WI Cranberry School Proceedings | ii TABLE OF CONTENTS: ASSESSING BIOLOGICAL IMPACTS OF IPM ADOPTION BY THE WISCONSIN CRANBERRY INDUSTRY: FINAL REPORT M. SINGLETON AND D. MAHR ......................................................................... 1 CRANBERRY DISEASES AND FRUIT ROT CONTROL P. OUDEMANS AND P. MCMANUS ..................................................................... 7 ADDRESSING SUSTAINABILITY IN U.S. AGRICULTURE: BACKGROUND AND A WAY FORWARD J. COLQUHOUN .................................................................................... 12 CRANBERRY CANOPY MANAGEMENT R. HARBUT .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Speaker Bios (254.62
    federal trade commission 601 new jersey ave, nw washington, dc bios green building & textiles Allen Blakey is Vice President of Industry and Government Affairs for Vinyl Institute (VI), the national trade association for manufacturers of vinyl (polyvinyl chloride or PVC) resin. He directs association programs related to vinyl product industries (building, medical, packaging, consumer and other product areas) as well as policy development and government affairs. Before joining VI in 1999, Mr. Blakey spent 10 years as director of public affairs for the Environmental Industry Associations, representing waste service, recycling and equipment manufacturing companies. He was also a senior vice president with E. Bruce Harrison Company, a Washington public relations firm specializing in environmental and energy issues. He started his career as a reporter and editor with various specialized Washington publications covering medical products, pharmaceuticals, and chemicals. Corey Brinkema is President of FSC-US, the national initiative of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). Mr. Brinkema has 22 years of national and international experience in sustainable development, including 10 years in green building design and development. He was the developer of one of the nation’s first speculative commercial buildings built according to comprehensive green principles and a founder of Minnesota GreenStar, a regional standard for green homebuilding and remodeling. He has provided technical, management, and strategic planning oversight to projects in high-performance real estate and eco-industrial development, energy efficiency and distributed energy, manufacturing resource efficiency, recycled and green products marketing, and hazardous waste management and brownfields remediation. Mr. Brinkema is a director of the U.S. Green Building Council Mississippi Headwaters Chapter as well as the Eco-Industrial Development Council.
    [Show full text]