Agenda Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
AGENDA ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION April 20, 2021 4:30 PM, WebEx Virtual Meeting (See agenda packet for instructions to join the meeting) I.WEBEX MEETING INSTRUCTIONS TO JOIN ONLINE: Go to www.webex.com and click on "Join" in the top right corner Enter Meeting Number: 182 529 2826 Enter Password: 81611 Click "Join Meeting" -- OR -- JOIN BY PHONE Call: 1-408-418-9388 Enter Meeting Number: 182 529 2826 Enter Password: 81611 II.ROLL CALL III.COMMENTS IV.MINUTES IV.A. DRAFT Meeting Minutes for January 19, 2021 minutes.apz.20210119.docx IV.B. DRAFT Meeting Minutes for February 2, 2021 minutes.apz.20210202.docx IV.C. DRAFT Meeting Minutes for March 2, 2021 minutes.apz.20210302.docx IV.D. DRAFT Meeting Minutes for March 3, 2021 minutes.apz.20210303.docx V.DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST VI.PUBLIC HEARINGS 1 1 VI.A. Resolution Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation Land Use Code Amendment - Growth Management and Affordable Housing Credits PandZ_Staff Memo_GMQS Amendments .pdf Draft Resolution_4.20.21.docx EXHIBIT A_Policy Resolution.pdf EXHIBIT B_Aspen FIL Study_Draft 04.14.21.pdf Exhibit C_Summary of Public Comment.pdf EXHIBIT D_ Notes from outreach sessions.pdf VI.B. Resolution Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation Land Use Code Amendment - Residential Multi-Family (RMF and RMFA) Zone Districts PandZ_Staff Memo_RMF.pdf Draft Resolution_4.20.21.docx EXHIBIT A _Application.pdf Exhibit B_Outreach materials.pdf Exhibit C_ Summary of Public Comment through 4-14-21.pdf Exhibit D - Survey Monkey results.pdf VII.ADJOURN Typical Proceeding Format for All Public Hearings 1) Conflicts of Interest (handled at beginning of agenda) 2) Provide proof of legal notice (affidavit of notice for PH) 3) Staff presentation 4) Board questions and clarifications of staff 5) Applicant presentation 6) Board questions and clarifications of applicant 7) Public comments 8) Board questions and clarifications relating to public comments 9) Close public comment portion of bearing 10) Staff rebuttal/clarification of evidence presented by applicant and public comment 11) Applicant rebuttal/clarification End of fact finding. Deliberation by the commission commences. No further interaction between commission and staff, applicant or public 12) Chairperson identified the issues to be discussed among commissioners. 13) Discussion between commissioners* 14) Motion* 2 2 *Make sure the discussion and motion includes what criteria are met or not met. Revised January 8, 2021 3 3 Minutes Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission January 19, 2021 Chairperson McKnight called the special meeting to order at 4:30 PM. Commissioners in attendance: Brittanie Rockhill, Rally Dupps, Scott Marcoux, Teraissa McGovern, Ruth Carver, and Spencer McKnight Commissioners not in attendance: James Marcus, Kimbo Brown-Schirato and Don Love Staff in Attendance: Amy Simon, Planning Director Kate Johnson, Assistant City Attorney Kevin Rayes, Planner Cindy Klob, Records Manager COMMISSIONER COMMENTS None STAFF COMMENTS Ms. Simon noted it is time to elect a chair and vice-chair for 2021 and Kate Johnson will provide options for this at the end of this meeting. PUBLIC COMMENTS None APPROVAL OF MINUTES None DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST None PUBLIC HEARING Gondola Plaza Clock Tower & Master Sign Plan Amendment Mr. McKnight opened the hearing and asked if proper notice was provided. Ms. Johnson stated the published notice was found sufficient for the meeting. Mr. McKnight then turned the floor over to staff. Mr. Kevin Rayes, Planner, explained the applicant will present first and then staff will present. Mr. McKnight and Ms. McGovern requested the proceeding format provided in the packet be modified to reflect this change in procedure. Mr. McKnight then turned the floor over to Mr. Gert Van Moorsel, Aspen Skiing Company (ASC). Mr. Van Moorsel identified the Aspen Mountain Plaza as the main portal to the Aspen Mountain Ski Area and discussed its location on existing land owned by the ASC. He noted the upper and lower plazas have a combined 467 SF of approved allotted signage area. He also discussed the existing inventory and future signs identified under the Master Sign Plan approved in 2013. He reviewed the application for a new clock tower to replace the existing clock tower. Page 1 of 6 4 Minutes Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission January 19, 2021 He stated the proposal includes two signs at this time. One being the re-imagined clock tower with a partner. The second being a new sign for the remodeled locker room located in the west wing of the Little Nell Complex. The applicant is not planning to exceed the allotment of 467 SF. Mr. Van Moorsel displayed a picture of existing clock tower and noted it wasn’t included in the original inventory because they did not realize it was a sign. Mr. Van Moorsel displayed a site plan of the lower Gondola Plaza and reviewed the existing Master Sign Plan. He also reviewed a sign plan for the upper Gondola Plaza. Mr. Van Moorsel next displayed exhibits of the proposed new clock tower sign to show its size and scale, the outer and inner panels and the clock face display. He provided an example of the clock face noting their corporate partner, Hublot, would like to put their name on the face along with the ASC name on the face. He stated both sides of the sign will have a frosted, etched acrylic panel behind a perforated, opaque, brushed aluminum panel. Another slide represented the structural frame supporting the clock tower including the location of light source in the base of the sign. He also provided a slide showing the construction detail and dimensions. He noted it will be 13.0 FT in height which is 6 IN shorter than the existing clock tower, 2.5 FT in width and 1 FT 3 IN in depth. He stated he is still working with staff regarding how much of the panels should be counted toward the allotment. He stated the sign will be lighted from the bottom, but it is encased. Mr. Van Moorsel discussed the detailed review standards. He reiterated the new clock tower will be in the same location and orientation. He also noted the new sign is in four mountain view planes but does not infringe on any of them. He stated they feel confident the clock tower illumination will comply with the City’s lighting standards. Mr. Van Moorsel provided examples of how the tower will look with under front-lit natural light and under back-lit artificial light. He reiterated ASC supports the arts. He then discussed the design stating it will be an abstract sculpture with panels allowing natural light to pass through the structure and cast shadows. At night, its soft glow it will provide an anchor to the plaza and ski portal. He stated the clock tower will have two sides and they believe it will be back-lit. The inspiration for the geometric shapes on the tower comes from the fusion of the crystalline structure of snow and ice combined with the precision of technology involved with a fine timepiece. He also noted the existing electrical supply will support the proposed tower without any new utilities required. And if a new foundation is required, the existing pavers in the plaza will be salvaged and reused as much as possible. Mr. Van Moorsel the provided a display of proposed new Aspen Mountain Club sign. He identified the proposed location of the cast bronze entry sign and dimensions of the sign as less than 1 SF of area. Mr. Van Moorsel asked if there were any questions. Mr. McKnight asked the commissioners for questions of Mr. Van Moorsel. Page 2 of 6 5 Minutes Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission January 19, 2021 Mr. Marcoux asked if there was an agreement between Hublot and ASC to ensure the existence and prevent future design changes to the clock should the partnership end. He believes many believe the City of Aspen owns the clock and doesn’t believe many changes will go over well. Mr. Van Moorsel noted corporate sponsorships do change over time and believes the acrylic panel can be replaced if necessary and the clock face could be replaced. ASC hopes the keep the structure and base for a long time. Mr. Dupps asked how visible is the Hublot logo in the panel. Mr. Van Moorsel doesn’t believe a lot of people will even notice it. He displayed an example of the panels and pointed out the Hublot logo etched in the acrylic panel. He believes the logo is subtle and suspects the general public won’t recognize it. Ms. Carver asked if there will be a service door on the side of the panel. Mr. Van Moorsel stated they will need to provide access to the light for maintenance purposes but was not sure how it would be done. Ms. Carver thought it would be nice if the light could be different colors for holidays or other occasions similar to the Sardy House. Ms. Carver then asked if Hublot is a corporate partner with ASC other than this project. Mr. Van Moorsel stated they are, but he only knows it is companywide and runs across all their business lines. He stated the Hublot logo will be placed on clocks located at various locations including the lift shacks on the mountains. Mr. McKnight then turned the floor over to staff. Mr. Rayes stated the application is before the P&Z Commission as it is a minor amendment to the Detailed Review for the Planned Development (PD). Mr. Rayes then reviewed the site location of the existing clock tower. Ordinance 53, Series 1985 originally approved the PD. It has been amended several times and the most recent being the 2013 Master Sign Plan.