WestminsterResearch http://www.westminster.ac.uk/westminsterresearch
Synth Sonics as Stylistic Signifiers in Sample-Based Hip-Hop: Synthetic Aesthetics from ‘Old-Skool’ to Trap Exarchos, M.
This is an electronic version of a paper presented at the 2nd Annual Synthposium, Melbourne, Australia, 14 November 2016.
The WestminsterResearch online digital archive at the University of Westminster aims to make the research output of the University available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the authors and/or copyright owners.
Whilst further distribution of specific materials from within this archive is forbidden, you may freely distribute the URL of WestminsterResearch: ((http://westminsterresearch.wmin.ac.uk/).
In case of abuse or copyright appearing without permission e-mail [email protected] 2nd Annual Synthposium Synthesisers: Meaning though Sonics
Synth Sonics as Stylistic Signifiers in Sample-Based Hip-Hop: Synthetic Aesthetics from ‘Old-School’ to Trap
Michail Exarchos (a.k.a. Stereo Mike), London College of Music, University of West London
Intro-thesis
The literature on synthesisers ranges from textbooks on usage and historiogra- phy1 to scholarly analysis of their technological development under musicological and sociotechnical perspectives2. Most of these approaches, in one form or another, ac- knowledge the impact of synthesisers on musical culture, either by celebrating their role in powering avant-garde eras of sonic experimentation and composition, or by mapping the relationship between manufacturing trends and stylistic divergences in popular mu- sic. The availability of affordable, portable and approachable synthesiser designs has been highlighted as a catalyst for their crossover from academic to popular spheres, while a number of authors have dealt with the transition from analogue to digital tech- nologies and their effect on the stylisation of performance and production approaches3.
1 Respective examples include: Joel Chadabe, Electric Sound: The Past and Promise of Elec- tronic Music (Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1997). Martin Russ, Sound Synthesis and Sampling (Oxford: Focal Press, 2009). Mark Vail, The Synthesiser: A Comprehensive Guide to Understanding, Programming, Playing, and Recording the Ultimate Electronic Music Instrument (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014).
2 Respectively: Paul Théberge, Any Sound You Can Imagine: Making Music/Consuming Tech- nology (Middletown: Wesleyan University Press, 1997). Hans T. Zeiner-Henriksen, “Old Instru- ments, New Agendas: The Chemical Brothers and the ARP 2600,” Dancecult: Journal of Elec- tronic Music Culture 6, no. 1 (2014): 26-40, doi: 10.12801/1947-5403.2014.06.01.02.
3 Respectively: Tellef Kvifte, "Digital sampling and analogue aesthetics,” Aesthetics at Work (2007): 105-28, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234037742_Digital_sam- pling_and_analogue_aesthetics. Barry Sandywell and David Beer, “Stylistic Morphing: Notes on the Digitisation of Contemporary Music Culture,” Convergence: The International Journal of Re- search into New Media Technologies 11, no. 4 (2005): 106-121, doi: 10.1177//1354856505061057.