DOCSLIB.ORG

Main Street Study 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Main Street Study 2016 NEW BRITAIN BOROUGH MAIN STREET STUDY DECEMBER 2016 NEW BRITAIN BOROUGH Main Street Study December 2016 New Britain Borough 45 Keeley Avenue New Britain, PA 18901 Phone: 215-348-4586 Fax: 215-348-5953 www.newbritainboro.com NEW BRITAIN BOROUGH Main Street Study December 2016 Borough Council Robyne Kelemen, President Peter LaMontagne, Vice President Robert Binkley, Member Jeffrey Gilmore, Member Mary Pat Holewinski, Member Lori Kesilman, Member Thomas Price, Member David Holewinski, Mayor Planning Commission Michael Stanislaw, Chairperson Karl Dieterichs, Vice Chairperson Robert Binkley, Member Rick Eggleston, Member Loren Frasco, Member David Holewinski, Member Richard Moxey, Member Michael Parke, Member Margaret Remmey, Member Community and Business Committee Andrea Antell, Resident Debbie Byrne, Byrne Sewing Jackie D’Agostino, Resident Dave Fermier Jr., Bucks-Mont Party Center Loren Frasco, Resident Steven Gieseler, Gieseler Insurance Agency Inc. Steven Gilmore, Gilmore & Associates New Britain Borough Main Street Study David Joss, Federal Realty Lorraine Moxey, Resident Richard Moxey, Resident Peg Remmey, Resident Bill Vandegrift, Bill Vandegrift Inc. Planning Consultant Bucks County Planning Commission 1260 Almshouse Road Doylestown, PA 18901 Phone: 215-345-3400 Fax: 215-345-3886 Website: www.buckscounty.org Email: [email protected] New Britain Borough Main Street Study Table of Contents.....iii TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1 Study Purpose ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Study Area ................................................................................................................................................... 2 PART I - EXISTING CONDITIONS ...................................................................................... 3 Regional Setting ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Population and Demographic Trends ...................................................................................................... 4 Population ............................................................................................................................................ 4 Race and Ethnicity ............................................................................................................................... 5 Households and Families .................................................................................................................... 6 Population and Housing Projections................................................................................................. 7 Land Use Characteristics ............................................................................................................................ 9 Regional Land Use ............................................................................................................................... 9 Study Area Land Use ........................................................................................................................... 9 Residential Land Use ........................................................................................................................... 9 Nonresidential land Use .................................................................................................................... 10 Parks, Recreation, and Protected Open Space ............................................................................... 11 Transportation and Utilities .............................................................................................................. 11 Vacant ................................................................................................................................................. 11 Historic Resources .................................................................................................................................... 12 Underutilized Properties .......................................................................................................................... 13 Transportation/Circulation ..................................................................................................................... 18 Transportation System ....................................................................................................................... 18 Pedestrians and Bicyclists .................................................................................................................. 23 Public Transportation ........................................................................................................................ 24 DVRPC Transportation Improvement Program .......................................................................... 28 Policy and Regulatory Provisions ........................................................................................................... 30 New Britain Borough Comprehensive Plan ................................................................................... 30 Butler Avenue Revitalization Strategies .......................................................................................... 33 Bucks County Comprehensive Plan ................................................................................................ 34 New Britain Borough Zoning Ordinance ....................................................................................... 35 Economic Conditions............................................................................................................................... 42 Retail Market Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 42 Assets, Constraints, and Opportunities .......................................................................................... 55 PART II - BUTLER AVENUE MAIN STREET REVITALIZATION PLAN.................... 57 Overall Vision .......................................................................................................................................... 58 Mobility Enhancement ............................................................................................................................. 59 Table of Contents │ i New Britain Borough Main Street Study Connectivity ........................................................................................................................................ 59 Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety ......................................................................................................... 61 Transportation System ....................................................................................................................... 62 Access Management ........................................................................................................................... 64 Streetscape Improvements ................................................................................................................ 66 Speed Reduction ................................................................................................................................. 66 Potential Funding Sources ................................................................................................................ 66 Summary of Mobility Enhancement Strategies/Recommendations .......................................... 66 Main Street Design .................................................................................................................................... 69 Streetscapes ......................................................................................................................................... 69 Streetscape Segments ......................................................................................................................... 73 Town Center ....................................................................................................................................... 74 Historic Village ................................................................................................................................... 77 University Village ............................................................................................................................... 79 Gateways .................................................................................................................................................... 81 Western Entrance Gateway .............................................................................................................. 82 Western Gateway (University Village) ............................................................................................. 84 Eastern Gateway (University Village) .............................................................................................. 86 Identifiable Features ................................................................................................................................. 89 Design Guidelines ..................................................................................................................................... 92 Economic Development Strategies .......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fiscal Year 2019 Annual Service Plan
    FISCAL YEAR 2019 ANNUAL SERVICE PLAN Service Planning Department April 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 ANNUAL SERVICE PLAN TIMELINE 2 I. SUMMARY AND LIST OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES 3 II. ANNUAL SERVICE PLAN PROCESS 5 III. EVALUATION PROCESS 6 IV. RECOMMENDED PROJECTS 8 V. NON-RECOMMENDED PROJECTS 10 VI. POST-IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW OF PRIOR YEAR’S CHANGES 11 VII. ANNUAL ROUTE AND STATION PERFORMANCE REVIEW 13 APPENDICES 15 PROJECT MAPS 16 PROJECT COSTS/REVENUE SUMMARY CHARTS 45 COMMUNITY BENEFIT ANALYSIS COMPUTATIONS 51 ANNUAL ROUTE PERFORMANCE REVIEW 61 City Transit 63 Suburban Transit 65 Contract Operations 66 ANNUAL STATION PERFORMANCE REVIEW 67 City Transit 68 Suburban Transit 70 Regional Rail Division 74 Regional Rail Stations 75 INTRODUCTION The Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) is pleased to present its Annual Service Plan (ASP) for Fiscal Year 2019. This document describes the service proposals suggested by the general public, government agencies, elected officials and Authority staff, and presents the technical and financial analyses that determine whether the proposals merit implementation. The Plan includes projects for City Transit and Suburban Transit. There are no proposals for Regional Rail. This year marks the 21st Annual Service Plan and its associated planning process. This and the previous efforts reflect SEPTA’s ongoing commitment to improve the performance and productivity of transit routes and regional rail lines through careful measurement of both ridership changes and operating cost based upon a numeric scoring methodology. This method, fully described for each proposal, includes measures for revenues, operating costs, and impacts to existing riders. Additionally, each proposal must meet minimum performance standards, adopted by the SEPTA Board, prior to review within the service plan process.
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware Canal State Park
    ǭȱ іљђȱ юџјђџȱ џюіљѕђюёȱѐѐђѠѠȱ юћёȱ џюіљȱ ќѤћѠ ȱȱǭȱ 59 39 31 29 25 ȱǭȱȱȱ ȱ ȱ ȱȱǯȱ New Hope S e SHOPPING cond S Main St 9 miles to Rosemont ȱȱȱ Town of New Hope D Uhlerstown St 611 Northampton St e Bull Lockatong Creek l ȱȱȱȱ www.dcnr.state.pa.us As a destination for artists, musicians, writers and others Island Raven a Quarry Rd Rock Rd w Ĝȱ ȱȱ ȱȱȱ seeking a respite from daily life, New Hope provides a ȱ DISTRICT Pine St a R iv r e ȱȱȱ ȱȱ www.fodc.org ȱ¢ǯȱȱȱȱȱęȱȱ Easton ScoĴ e r R ȱȱ ȱǭȱ treasures, delectable meals and refreshing drinks in the shops, Park R d Ferry St Si i 32 29 D&R Trail Stockton tg v D ȱȱȱȱ ȱ ȱ ǯĴǯ restaurants and pubs along Main Street and tucked into side e e l a 29 rea Rd w a r e R Prallsville Easton r ll i v e r Hi ȱȱ ȱȱȱ¢ streets and alleys. As evening sets in, music pours into the ȱ ve en D& re Lumberville L Trail s S G Th 20 miles to Rd Rd Hendrick ȱȱȱ¢ www.septa.org streets, the curtain goes up at the iconic Bucks County Larry Holmes Dr ge xson Prallsville t a D ir Sugan Rd a P Uhlerstown it e Island d S m Mills Ar l . ȱȱȱ Playhouse, and energy surges through the town. Dam Ca N Main St t na ail l Sta ȱ ȱȱȱ ȱ ǯ ǯ Tr te L Del.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Year 2017 Annual Service Plan
    FISCAL YEAR 2017 ANNUAL SERVICE PLAN Service Planning Department 2016 DRAFT COPY TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 ANNUAL SERVICE PLAN TIMELINE 2 I. SUMMARY AND LIST OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES 3 II. ANNUAL SERVICE PLAN PROCESS 4 III. EVALUATION PROCESS 5 IV. RECOMMENDED PROJECTS 7 V. NON-RECOMMENDED PROJECTS 8 VI. POST-IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW OF PRIOR YEAR’S CHANGES 21 VII. ANNUAL ROUTE AND STATION PERFORMANCE REVIEW 26 APPENDICES 28 PROJECT MAPS 29 PROJECT COSTS/REVENUE SUMMARY CHARTS 36 COMMUNITY BENEFIT ANALYSIS COMPUTATIONS 39 ANNUAL ROUTE PERFORMANCE REVIEW 42 City Transit 44 Suburban Transit 46 Contract Operations 47 ANNUAL STATION PERFORMANCE REVIEW 48 City Transit 49 Suburban Transit 64 Regional Rail Division 68 Regional Rail Stations 73 INTRODUCTION The Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) is pleased to present its Annual Service Plan (ASP) for Fiscal Year 2017. This document describes the service proposals suggested by the general public, government agencies, elected officials and Authority staff, and presents the technical and financial analyses that determine whether the proposals merit implementation. The Plan includes projects for City Transit and Suburban Transit. There are no proposals for Regional Rail. This year marks the 19th Annual Service Plan and its associated planning process. This and the previous efforts reflect SEPTA’s ongoing commitment to improve the performance and productivity of transit routes and regional rail lines through careful measurement of both ridership changes and operating cost based upon a numeric scoring methodology. This method, fully described for each proposal, includes measures for revenues, operating costs, and impacts to existing riders. Additionally, each proposal must meet minimum performance standards, adopted by the SEPTA Board, prior to review within the service plan process.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed FISCAL YEAR 2016 ANNUAL SERVICE PLAN
    Proposed FISCAL YEAR 2016 ANNUAL SERVICE PLAN Service Planning Department April 2015 SEPTA Proposed FISCAL YEAR 2016 ANNUAL SERVICE PLAN Service Planning Department April 2015 SEPTA TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 ANNUAL SERVICE PLAN TIMELINE 2 I. SUMMARY AND LIST OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES 3 II. ANNUAL SERVICE PLAN PROCESS 5 III. EVALUATION PROCESS 6 IV. RECOMMENDED PROJECTS 8 V. NON-RECOMMENDED PROJECTS 12 VI. POST-IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW OF PRIOR YEAR’S CHANGES 22 VII. ANNUAL ROUTE AND STATION PERFORMANCE REVIEW 25 APPENDICES 27 PROJECT MAPS 28 PROJECT COSTS/REVENUE SUMMARY CHARTS 59 COMMUNITY BENEFIT ANALYSIS COMPUTATIONS 70 ANNUAL ROUTE AND STATION PERFORMANCE REVIEW 88 City Transit 90 Suburban Transit 92 Contract Operations 93 Regional Rail Division 94 Regional Rail Stations 95 INTRODUCTION The Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) is pleased to present its Annual Service Plan (ASP) for Fiscal Year 2016. This document describes the service proposals suggested by the general public, government agencies, elected officials and Authority staff, and presents the technical and financial analyses that determine whether the proposals merit implementation. The Plan includes projects for City Transit and Suburban Transit. There are no proposals for Regional Rail. This year marks the 18th Annual Service Plan and its associated planning process. This and the previous efforts reflect SEPTA’s ongoing commitment to improve the performance and productivity of transit routes and regional rail lines through careful measurement of both ridership changes and operating cost based upon a numeric scoring methodology. This method, fully described for each proposal, includes measures for revenues, operating costs, and impacts to existing riders.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberty Bell Trail Feasibility Study Lansdale Borough, Pennsylvania
    Upper Gwynedd Township 1 Parkside Place North Wales, PA 19454 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION ITEM REQUEST Date: February 4, 2021 To: Sandra Brookley Zadell, Township Manager From: Sarah A Prebis, Park and Recreation Director Re: Consultant for the Liberty Bell Trail Meeting Date: February 16, 2021 Background: The Liberty Bell Trail is a proposed trail that will continue for 25 miles, potentially connect Quakertown to East Norriton in Montgomery County. As passed in the 2020 budget on December 16, 2019, the board agreed to budget to partially fund a survey for the Liberty Bell Trail. We had 9 RFP’s submitted and the selection committee chose 3 to interview. After listening to all 3 consultants, we have chosen Michael Baker, Inc to complete our Liberty Bell Trail Study with a cost of $112,000. The municipalities included in this study are Franconia Township, Hatfield Borough, Hatfield Township, Lansdale Borough, Souderton Borough, Telford Borough, and Upper Gwynedd Township. Upper Gwynedd Township is the lead on this project. Budget Impact: The Liberty Bell Project will be receiving $113,000 from DVRPC. The match for this is $28,250. Since Upper Gwynedd Township has not completed any of this trail, our portion for the match is $12,000. The proposal indicates the cost will be $112,000 and we have budgeted $113,000. Interdepartmental Action: Upper Gwynedd will get a contract out to Michael Baker, Inc. PA Environmental Council and all 7 municipalities would proceed to work with Michael Baker, Inc on the project. Recommended Motion/Resolution/Ordinance: Motion to appoint Michael Baker, Inc, as our consultant for the Liberty Bell Trail.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Service Plan Annual Service Plan
    Fiscal YearYear 2020 Annual SeServicervice Plan Service Planning Department June 2019 FISCAL YEAR 2020 ANNUAL SERVICE PLAN Service Planning Department July 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 ANNUAL SERVICE PLAN TIMELINE 2 I. SUMMARY AND LIST OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES 3 II. ANNUAL SERVICE PLAN PROCESS 4 III. EVALUATION PROCESS 6 IV. RECOMMENDED PROJECTS 8 V. NON-RECOMMENDED PROJECTS 9 VI. POST-IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW OF PRIOR YEAR’S CHANGES 10 VII. ANNUAL ROUTE AND STATION PERFORMANCE REVIEW 12 APPENDICES 14 PROJECT MAPS 15 PROJECT COSTS/REVENUE SUMMARY CHARTS 25 COMMUNITY BENEFIT ANALYSIS COMPUTATIONS 26 ANNUAL ROUTE PERFORMANCE REVIEW 27 City Transit 29 Suburban Transit 32 COntract OperatiOns 34 ANNUAL STATION PERFORMANCE REVIEW 35 City Transit 36 Suburban Transit 38 RegiOnal Rail DivisiOn 42 Regional Rail Stations 47 INTRODUCTION The SOutheastern Pennsylvania TranspOrtatiOn AuthOrity (SEPTA) is pleased tO present its Annual Service Plan (ASP) fOr Fiscal Year 2020. This dOcument describes the service prOpOsals suggested by the general public, gOvernment agencies, elected Officials and AuthOrity staff, and presents the technical and financial analyses that determine whether the prOpOsals merit implementatiOn. The Plan includes prOjects fOr City Transit and Suburban Transit. There are nO prOpOsals fOr RegiOnal Rail. This year marks the 22nd Annual Service Plan and its associated planning prOcess. This and the previOus effOrts reflect SEPTA’s OngOing commitment tO imprOve the perfOrmance and productivity Of transit rOutes and RegiOnal Rail lines thrOugh careful measurement Of bOth ridership changes and Operating cost based upOn a numeric scoring methOdOlOgy. This methOd, fully described fOr each prOpOsal, includes measures fOr revenues, Operating costs, and impacts tO existing riders.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Rail Stations Closure Study
    Regional Rail Stations Closures Study November 2003 Regional Rail Stations Closures Study The Bourse Building 111 South Independence Mall East Philadelphia, PA 19106-2582 215.592.1800 www.dvrpc.org November 2003 Created in 1965, the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) is an interstate, intercounty and intercity agency that provides continuing, comprehensive and coordinated planning to shape a vision for the future growth of the Delaware Valley region. The region includes Bucks, Chester, Delaware, and Montgomery counties, as well as the City of Philadelphia, in Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester and Mercer counties in New Jersey. DVRPC provides technical assistance and services; conducts high priority studies that respond to the requests and demands of member state and local governments; fosters cooperation among various constituents to forge a consensus on diverse regional issues; determines and meets the needs of the private sector; and practices public outreach efforts to promote two-way communication and public awareness of regional issues and the Commission. Our logo is adapted from the official DVRPC seal, and is designed as a stylized image of the Delaware Valley. The outer ring symbolizes the region as a whole, while the diagonal bar signifies the Delaware River. The two adjoining crescents represent the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of New Jersey. DVRPC is funded by a variety of funding sources including federal grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Pennsylvania and New Jersey departments of transportation, as well as by DVRPC’s state and local member governments.
    [Show full text]
  • Speeding up SEPTA I
    Created in 1965, the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) is an interstate, intercounty, and intercity agency that provides continuing, comprehensive, and coordinated planning to shape a vision for the future growth of the Delaware Valley region. The region includes Bucks, Chester, Delaware, and Montgomery counties, as well as the City of Philadelphia in Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester, and Mercer counties in New Jersey. DVRPC provides technical assistance and services; conducts high priority studies that respond to the requests and demands of member state and local governments; fosters cooperation among various constituents to forge a consensus on diverse regional issues; determines and meets the needs of the private sector; and practices public outreach efforts to promote two-way communication and public awareness of regional issues and the Commission. The DVRPC logo is adapted from the official seal of the Commission and is designed as a stylized image of the Delaware Valley. The outer ring symbolizes the region as a whole while the diagonal bar signifies the Delaware River flowing through it. The two adjoining crescents represent the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of New Jersey. The logo combines these elements to depict the areas served by DVRPC. DVRPC is funded by a variety of funding sources including federal grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Pennsylvania and New Jersey departments of transportation, as well as by DVRPC’s state and local member governments. The authors, however, are solely responsible for this report’s findings and conclusions, which may not represent the official views of policies of the funding agencies.
    [Show full text]