DOCSLIB.ORG

Liberty Bell Trail Feasibility Study Lansdale Borough, Pennsylvania

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Upper Gwynedd Township 1 Parkside Place North Wales, PA 19454 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION ITEM REQUEST Date: February 4, 2021 To: Sandra Brookley Zadell, Township Manager From: Sarah A Prebis, Park and Recreation Director Re: Consultant for the Liberty Bell Trail Meeting Date: February 16, 2021 Background: The Liberty Bell Trail is a proposed trail that will continue for 25 miles, potentially connect Quakertown to East Norriton in Montgomery County. As passed in the 2020 budget on December 16, 2019, the board agreed to budget to partially fund a survey for the Liberty Bell Trail. We had 9 RFP’s submitted and the selection committee chose 3 to interview. After listening to all 3 consultants, we have chosen Michael Baker, Inc to complete our Liberty Bell Trail Study with a cost of $112,000. The municipalities included in this study are Franconia Township, Hatfield Borough, Hatfield Township, Lansdale Borough, Souderton Borough, Telford Borough, and Upper Gwynedd Township. Upper Gwynedd Township is the lead on this project. Budget Impact: The Liberty Bell Project will be receiving $113,000 from DVRPC. The match for this is $28,250. Since Upper Gwynedd Township has not completed any of this trail, our portion for the match is $12,000. The proposal indicates the cost will be $112,000 and we have budgeted $113,000. Interdepartmental Action: Upper Gwynedd will get a contract out to Michael Baker, Inc. PA Environmental Council and all 7 municipalities would proceed to work with Michael Baker, Inc on the project. Recommended Motion/Resolution/Ordinance: Motion to appoint Michael Baker, Inc, as our consultant for the Liberty Bell Trail. F:\Sarah\Meeting Documents\Memos for Board\liberty bell trail consultant - baker.docx January 12, 2021 Zhenya J. Nalywayko, Trails & Recreation Program Coordinator Pennsylvania Environmental Council 1315 Walnut Street, Suite 532 Philadelphia, PA 19107 RE: Proposal for Liberty Bell Trail Planning and Feasibility Study Dear Mr. Nalywayko, Michael Baker International, Inc. (Michael Baker), in association with Wikimapping Inc. (Wikimaps), is excited to submit this proposal for this update to the Liberty Bell Trail Planning and Feasibility Study. The Liberty Bell Trail (LBT) has been under planning and development in Montgomery County for over a decade in various municipalities with some sections already successfully completed. Michael Baker’s local office has been based in Fort Washington for almost 25 years, and we have several staff who live in the communities that will benefit from the LBT. Our Montgomery County based team has a personal as well as professional desire to see this trail vision become reality. We have been involved with various planning workshops and feasibility studies for portions of the LBT over the last decade and look forward to applying our trail planning skills and design experience to advance the completion of this important addition to the Circuit Trails network. Our team brings the following advantages to this trail plan update: • Prior experience with the LBT from a previous feasibility study for this trail in Lansdale Borough, grant writing assistance for the LBT as part of the Madison Lansdale Apartment project, and design and construction oversight for the LBT in Coopersburg Borough. • Experience with Upper Gwynedd Township from the ongoing Powerline Trail study, prior design of the 202 Parkway and trail, SR 202 Section 65N, and other local projects. Our knowledge of this area may lead to the co-location of the LBT with a portion of the Powerline Trail and a spur connection to the Wissahickon Green Ribbon Trail leading to a more cost-effective and improved trail alignment. • We have an excellent working relationship with PEC from several years working together on the 58th Street Greenway and collaboration on trail projects for the last six years through our on-call agreement with PEC. On the 58th Street Greenway and several recent trail planning efforts, PEC and Michael Baker shared public outreach efforts in the same manner as proposed for this study. This existing experience working together will streamline the public involvement for this study. • Our bike/pedestrian team has over two decades of planning and public outreach experience with similar trail feasibility studies. Local examples include the LBT Study (Lansdale Borough), Turk Road Neighborhood Trail Study (Doylestown Township), Frankford Creek Greenway Study (City of Philadelphia), Rail Trail Feasibility Studies (City of Philadelphia), Swarthmore Borough Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plan, Schuylkill River Trail Gap Analysis (City of Philadelphia), and several others. This extensive background gives us many lessons learned and effective approaches to trail planning and implementation, property negotiation/acquisition, public engagement, environmental permitting, and agency coordination. • Our proposed project manager Chris Stanford, PE, PMP, AICP is a certified planner and professional engineer with over 27 years of experience successfully completing a wide range of trail, greenway, and transportation projects in southeast PA. Chris has been a resident of Franconia Township for over 20 years and knows the nearby Souderton and Telford Borough areas very well. This local knowledge will be beneficial to the team and facilitate cost-effective field views and municipal meetings. Chris will be assisted by experienced trail engineers Steve Disciullo, PE and Bill Torr, PE. Michael Baker International, Inc. 500 Office Center Drive, Suite 210, Fort Washington, PA 19034 | Office: 215-444-0888 | Fax: 215-444-0889 • Our public outreach expert, Hannah Clark, AICP, a former senior planner from the City of Allentown, will assist the PEC team with municipal outreach. Our virtual public meeting room website will be very helpful for this large-scale study. Hannah will be assisted by veteran planner, Matt Bodnar, AICP. • Similar to approaches we have used in Doylestown Township, our plan will recommend SALDO changes, addition of the LBT to official maps, use of municipal and PennDOT pavement surfacing programs to create bike lanes, and use of private development projects to construct trails or make contributions towards future design and construction of the LBT. • We have partnered with Jenkintown resident and avid bicyclist Steve Spindler of Wikimapping to assist with the public outreach process. Wikimaps is a cost-effective and easy to use tool to gain public input on a map-based platform that the public can conveniently access on any device at any time. The tool allows the public the ability to comment on proposed alignments, to indicate barriers to walking/bicycling at specific locations, to provide suggestions for trail connections, and to ask questions about potential trail routes. This tool will be linked to each Township’s website, social media accounts, and PEC’s other online messaging to achieve maximum input from many residents and gain feedback that will be beneficial to this planning and feasibility study. Wikimaps was used effectively as part of the Bike Montco plan, which included the LBT. • Our knowledge of grant funding programs, such as DCNR, PennDOT TASA, PennDOT Multimodal, DCED Multimodal, DCED Greenways and Trails, DVRPC Regional Trails Program, and others will result in a superior implementation plan. We understand that the scope of this study is an update of the LBT Feasibility Study, including a 11-mile corridor within 7 municipalities. Our team has all the qualifications required by PEC and DVRPC to successfully complete this study. As demonstrated from our in-depth proposal that follows, the Michael Baker Team has a solid understanding of this project’s unique challenges and has formulated a streamlined approach to meet PEC’s goals. Our Montgomery County-based team provides a unique combination of trail planning experience on similar studies, excellent working relationship with PEC, public outreach coordination enhanced by Wikimaps, and previous experience with LBT studies that make us distinctly qualified for this study. Please contact Chris Stanford, Project Manager, (phone: 215-528-7072; email: [email protected]) if you have any questions regarding this proposal. Sincerely, MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC. (Federal ID # 25-1228638) Eric Frary, PE Chris Stanford, PE, PMP, AICP Senior Vice President Project Manager Michael Baker International, Inc. 500 Office Center Drive, Suite 210, Fort Washington, PA 19034 | Office: 215-444-0888 | Fax: 215-444-0889 TABLE OF CONTENTS Profile of Firm 1 Methods and Procedures 21 Work Schedule 28 Appendix A: Scope of Work 29 Appendix B: Resumes 33 PEC | Liberty Bell Trail Planning & Feasibility Study PROFILE OF FIRM Michael Baker International, Inc. (Michael Baker) is a Pennsylvania- based corporation, founded in 1940, with its headquarters located in Michael Baker Office Locations Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Michael Baker is authorized to perform professional engineering services in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Headquarters: Local Office: and is incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth. Locally, 500 Grant Street 500 Office Center Drive Michael Baker has three eastern Pennsylvania offices located in Suite 5400 Suite 210 Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Fort Washington, PA 19034 Philadelphia, Fort Washington, and Allentown. Our Montgomery County presence began in 1997. Since then, Michael Baker has continuously www.mbakerintl.com completed projects ranging from small municipal projects to $100+ million PennDOT highway and bridge reconstruction projects over the past
Recommended publications
  • Competitive Programs

    Competitive Programs

    DVRPC FY2017 TIP FOR PENNSYLVANIA CHAPTER 7: COMPETITIVE PROGRAMS This section contains lists of projects that have been awarded via regional or statewide competitive programs, which are open to a specialized segment of the public. As projects move through the delivery pipeline, they may or may not show up in the active TIP project listings, but are important to the DVRPC region for demonstrating investments in particular types of infrastructure and potential fund sources. REGIONAL COMPETITIVE PROGRAMS Competitive Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Program – DVRPC periodically sets aside a specific amount of CMAQ funds for a DVRPC Competitive CMAQ Program (see MPMS #48201), which seeks transportation-related projects that can help the region reduce emissions from mobile sources and meet the National Clean Air Act Standards. CMAQ-eligible projects will demonstrably reduce air pollution emissions and, in many cases, reduce traffic congestion. Projects may be submitted by a public agency or a public-private partnership. A Subcommittee of the DVRPC Regional Technical Committee (RTC) evaluates the projects and makes recommendations to the DVRPC Board for final selection. In July 2016, the DVRPC Board approved the most recent round of the DVRPC Competitive CMAQ Program by selecting 17 projects for funding in the DVRPC Pennsylvania counties, for a total CMAQ award of $21,900,000. For more information, see www.dvrpc.org/CMAQ/ Regional Trails Program (Phases 1-4) – The Regional Trails Program, administered by the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission, with funding from the William Penn Foundation, aims to capitalize upon opportunities for trail development by providing funding for targeted, priority trail design, construction, and planning projects that will promote a truly connected, regional network of multiuse trails with Philadelphia and Camden as its hub.
  • About This Map New York a Library S President E T S Bay D St

    About This Map New York a Library S President E T S Bay D St

    George Washington Bridge East River Bridges George Washington Bridge - New Jersey George Washington Bridge - Manhattan Queensboro Bridge - Manhattan Queensboro Bridge - Queens Merkle Stairs to E 63 St To Route 9W Overpass to Hudson 41 Av River Greenway W 183 St Cross (Cycling Route) Y E 62 St 24 St 27 St W W 181 St 22 St Crescent Bike/Ped 28 St 29 St K e d George Washington Br P i Entrance s E 61 St 23 St N r 21 St Bike/Pedestrian Path e York Av O Cross with Pedestrian v E River Dr Lemoine W 180 St Hudson River i S Signals on Greenway R E 60 St To H. Hudson Dr. D Cabrini Bike/Ped Scenic Route U Entrance B H East River Queens Plz N ruc W 179 St e e R vd e eynolds Bl (via sidewalk) c c Roosevelt Pedestrian Path George Washington Br a a Port Authority r r r r Bike Path Bus Terminal Island e e Bike/Pedestrian Path Pedestrian Path Bike/Ped Entrance r Queensboro Br T T Tramway D Bike Path Main Y Bike/Ped n n Northern R W 178 St Queensboro Br o l Little Red E 59 St C a o s entr N Entrance s d Lighthouse d E Queens Plz S u Queens Blvd 2 Av 2 Av u Fort Lee H H H Haven Historic Park Pinehurst E 58 St Old alisade y P r W 177 St 1 Av Sutton Pl FDR DR FDR Parker n Palisade e H Hudson River 23 St Use North Sidewalk on Queens Blvd W 176 St Ft Washington E 57 St Williamsburg Bridge - Manhattan Williamsburg Bridge - Brooklyn Harlem River Bridges Stanton To BK Waterfront S 2 St To Grand St Greenway (Kent Av) Use Sidewalk Ridge Ridge S 3 St Rivington Suffolk Washington Bridge en Macombs Dam Bridge qu Driggs n W 184 St BRONX ri p Roebling Pitt Pitt o To
  • Trails, Parks & Open Space

    Trails, Parks & Open Space

    Delaware River Urban Waters Federal Partnership – Resource Paper Series (7/7/14) Trails, Parks & Open Space Overview The Greater Philadelphia / Lower Delaware River Urban Waters region is fortunate to have a variety of opportunities to create a connected network of multi-use trails, including both right-of-ways (ROWs) from the area's long history as a hub of railroad activity, and greenway corridors that follow the region's creek and park systems. Some of these opportunities have been capitalized upon – a number of significant trail segments already exist or are moving toward construction – but gaps still exist. Some Trail Systems “The Circuit” is a vision of a 750-mile interconnected network of multi-use trails announced in May 2012. A coalition of foundations, governments, non-profits, economic development professionals, and numerous other groups are working together to realize this vision for the Greater Philadelphia Region (including Philadelphia, Delaware, and Chester counties in Pennsylvania, and Camden and Burlington counties in New Jersey). To date, 250+ miles have been built. (http://connectthecircuit.org) The East Coast Greenway is a long-distance, urban, shared-use trail system that will ultimately link 25 major cities along the eastern seaboard from Calais, Maine to Key West, Florida. In Pennsylvania, the East Coast Greenway enters Morrisville from Trenton, NJ and follows PA Bike Route E for much of its 55-mile route, passing through lower Bucks County, Philadelphia, and Delaware County. Crossing into Delaware near Marcus Hook, the trail then travels 38 miles through the state, including 19 miles of completed trail. (www.greenway.org) The Northern Delaware Greenway Trail spans 9 miles of northern New Castle County from Fox Point State Park on the Delaware River to the Brandywine Creek and the City of Wilmington.
  • Geospatial Analysis: Commuters Access to Transportation Options

    Geospatial Analysis: Commuters Access to Transportation Options

    Advocacy Sustainability Partnerships Fort Washington Office Park Transportation Demand Management Plan Geospatial Analysis: Commuters Access to Transportation Options Prepared by GVF GVF July 2017 Contents Executive Summary and Key Findings ........................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Sources ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 ArcMap Geocoding and Data Analysis .................................................................................................. 6 Travel Times Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 7 Data Collection .......................................................................................................................................... 7 1. Employee Commuter Survey Results ................................................................................................ 7 2. Office Park Companies Outreach Results ......................................................................................... 7 3. Office Park
  • December 13, 2013 the Honorable

    December 13, 2013 the Honorable

    December 13, 2013 The Honorable Andrew M. Cuomo Governor of New York State NYS State Capitol Building Albany, NY 12224 Re: Dedicated Funding for Pedestrian and Bicycle Infrastructure Dear Governor Cuomo: The adoption of the Complete Streets law in 2011 has developed significant momentum for pedestrian and bicycle projects at the local level in our state. Communities across New York are eager to invest in pedestrian and bicycle projects, knowing that these projects improve their community’s quality of life, promote a healthier population, revitalize downtowns, increase real estate values and business activity, provide more equitable and affordable transportation choices, and reduce air pollution. Unfortunately, recent reductions in funding, on a state and federal level, greatly reduce the ability of communities to realize their goals. Since passage of the state’s Complete Streets law, the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) has substantially reduced funding for pedestrian and bicycling infrastructure. Through the Statewide Transportation Improvements Program (STIP), NYSDOT plans to spend 40% less on pedestrian and bicycling-only projects across the state over the next four years – equating to a $100 million reduction over the planning period. Road and bridge projects that include a small portion of pedestrian and bicycling infrastructure will be reduced by 60% under the STIP (excluding major bridge projects like the Tappan Zee Bridge). 1 In part, lower funding for this infrastructure is the result of a 30% reduction ($12 million annually) in funding for pedestrian and bicycling projects in the most recently adopted federal transportation law, MAP-21. While the state cannot control the level of funding coming from the federal government, these reductions also stem from NYSDOT’s new Preservation First policy, which categorically excludes new pedestrian and bicycling projects from 80% of the transportation dollars spent in this state.
  • The East Coast Greenway Alliance: a Model for Grassroots Greenway Initiatives

    The East Coast Greenway Alliance: a Model for Grassroots Greenway Initiatives

    The East Coast Greenway Alliance: A Model for Grassroots Greenway Initiatives Highlights of ECGA Progress Rhode Island and Massachusetts Ann Chapman 104 Shays Street Amherst, MA 01002 1 1. Introduction The U.S. greenway movement in the U.S. is a relatively recent phenomenon. Although historically, Frederick Law Olmsted and others created projects as early as the 1860s which we would today term “greenways”, the term itself wasn’t used until the 1950s. The contemporary U.S. greenway movement was given important encouragement when the 1987 President'’ Commission on Americans Outdoors publicly endorsed the concept. At that time, there was virtually no professional literature on the subject. However, an author’s query by Charles E.Little, placed in a variety of professional journals asking for information on active greenway projects resulted in over one hundred responses. Based on these responses, Little wrote a book, published in 1990, entitled Greenways for America, which was the first major book published on the topic (Little, 1990). Since that time, several other books and numerous articles have been published on various aspects of greenways. These include aspects of the planning design, and management of greenways in the U.S. and abroad. A good summary of the greenway movement here and abroad may be found in Greenways: The Beginning of an International Movement (Fabos and Ahern in 1996 ). An important element in understanding the diverse array of projects in the burgeoning greenways movement can be gained by categorizing them. As defined by Fabos (in Fabos and Ahern 1996 p. 5), the majority of greenways fall into three major categories: 1) ecologically significant corridors and natural systems (e.g.
  • Fall 2006 Volume 6, Issue 2

    Fall 2006 Volume 6, Issue 2

    Fall 2006 Volume 6, Issue 2 P.O. Box 35 Warrendale, PA 15086-0035 www.rachelcarsontrails.org [email protected] President’s Corner By Todd Chambers, President Inside This Issue Progress is being made on many fronts within our President’s Corner 1 organization. For years the Harmony Trails Council, the Trail Events Continue to Grow 1 predecessor of the Rachel Carson Trails Conservancy, laid the A Walk in the Woods 2 groundwork for the development of the Harmony Trail, from Volunteers Discuss Baker Trail Improvements 2 Wall Park in southern McCandless Township to Route 910 in Eagle Scout Projects Improve Trails 3 Pine Township. We acquired property and rights-of-way and established connections with local municipalities, the county, Volunteers Expand Community Trails 4 Event Calendar the state, a number of foundations, and other funding 4 sources. These past efforts have led to the tangible progress we now see. hike east across Route 19 to the McKinney Woods Trail, and over North Park trails to the beginning of the Rachel Carson Trail, With the incorporation of the Rachel Carson, Baker, and located on the east side of the park. Our past efforts with Pine Harmony trails to form the Rachel Carson Trails Conservancy, and McCandless Townships, Allegheny County, the Regional a broad network of trails across northern Allegheny County Asset District, the Allegheny Land Trust, the developers of Blue and through Westmoreland, Armstrong, Indiana, Jefferson, Heron Ridge and the Pittsburgh Foundation have all been Clarion and Forest Counties has come under our stewardship. instrumental in fostering this hike and the trail connection it This is a vast network of hiking opportunities accessing some celebrates.
  • 2020 Comprehensive Plan Update

    2020 Comprehensive Plan Update

    2020 Comprehensive Plan Update UPPER FREDERICK TOWNSHIP Montgomery County, PA Updated November 2020 by Tackett Planning, Incorporated Originally prepared January 2008 by CHPlanning Limited Upper Frederick Township Comprehensive Plan Upper Frederick Township Comprehensive Plan Upper Frederick Township Comprehensive Plan UPPER FREDERICK TOWNSHIP OFFICIALS BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Troy Armstrong, Chairman William Tray, Vice-Chairperson Sean Frisco, Member TOWNSHIP MANAGER Jackie Tallon PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS Richard Buckman, Chairman Joseph Buick Robert Keenan William O’Donnell Jared Landis Township Building 3205 Big Road Obelisk, Pennsylvania 19492 Upper Frederick Township Comprehensive Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS: Chapter 1: Introduction & History...................................................................................... 2 1.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Community Background ...................................................................................... 2 1.3 Regional Setting .................................................................................................. 4 1.4 Population ........................................................................................................... 7 1.5 Community Issues Survey .................................................................................... 9 Chapter 2: Resource Protection .....................................................................................
  • INVESTING in OUR FUTURE Quantifying the Impact of Completing the East Coast Greenway in the Delaware River Watershed

    INVESTING in OUR FUTURE Quantifying the Impact of Completing the East Coast Greenway in the Delaware River Watershed

    INVESTING IN OUR FUTURE Quantifying the Impact of Completing the East Coast Greenway in the Delaware River Watershed Report Prepared For: Prepared By: Executive Summary Completing the East Coast Greenway in the Delaware Watershed will provide: 175 2 MILES OF MULTI-USE TRAIL 2,460 TEMPORARY JOBS $840M IN ANNUAL TOURISM BENEFITS ($4.8M/MILE LOCAL ECONOMIC IMPACT) $2.2B ONE-TIME ECONOMIC BENEFITS Table of Contents What is the East Coast Greenway? 5 The East Coast Greenway in the Delaware Watershed 6 What the Greenway Connects 8 Transport + Safety Benefits 10 Case Study: Jack A. Markell Trail 12 Economic Benefits + Planning for Equity 14 Case Study: Bristol Borough 20 Health Benefits 22 Environmental Benefits 24 Case Study: Riverfront North Partnership 26 Conclusion 28 Bartram’s Mile segment of East Coast Greenway along west bank of Schuylkill River in Philadelphia. East Coast Greenway Alliance photo Sources 30 On the cover: celebrations on Schuylkill River Trail Schuylkill Banks photos ME Calais Bangor Augusta Portland NH Delaware Portsmouth MA Boston Watershed NY Hartford New Haven CT Providence NJ RI PA New York Philadelphia Trenton Wilmington MD Baltimore Washington DC Annapolis DE Fredericksburg VA Richmond 4 Norfolk NC Raleigh Fayetteville New Bern Wilmington SC Myrtle Beach Charleston GA Savannah Brunswick Jacksonville St.Augustine FL Melbourne Miami Key West greenway.org What is the East Coast Greenway? The East Coast Greenway is developing into one of the nation’s longest continuous biking and walking paths, connecting 15 states and 450 communities from Key West, Florida, to Calais, Maine. The in-progress Greenway is a place that bicyclists, walkers, runners, skaters, horseback riders, wheelchair users, and cross-country skiers of all ages and abilities can enjoy.
  • Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste D Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type D Award Allocatio Funding Types

    Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste D Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type D Award Allocatio Funding Types

    Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste d Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type d Award Allocatio Funding Types Alverthorpe Manor BRC-PRD- Region 1 Abington Township Cultural Park (6422) 11-3 11 Development $223,000 $136,900 Key - Community Abington Township TAP Trail- Development BRC-PRD- Region 1 Abington Township (1101296) 22-171 22 Trails $90,000 $90,000 Key - Community Ardsley Wildlife Sanctuary- BRC-PRD- Region 1 Abington Township Development 22-37 22 Development $40,000 $40,000 Key - Community Briar Bush Nature Center Master Site Plan BRC-TAG- Region 1 Abington Township (1007785) 20-12 20 Planning $42,000 $37,000 Key - Community Pool Feasibility Studies BRC-TAG- Region 1 Abington Township (1100063) 21-127 21 Planning $15,000 $15,000 Key - Community Rubicam Avenue Park KEY-PRD-1- Region 1 Abington Township (1) 1 01 Development $25,750 $25,700 Key - Community Demonstration Trail - KEY-PRD-4- Region 1 Abington Township Phase I (1659) 4 04 Development $114,330 $114,000 Key - Community KEY-SC-3- Region 1 Aldan Borough Borough Park (5) 6 03 Development $20,000 $2,000 Key - Community Ambler Pocket Park- Development BRC-PRD- Region 1 Ambler Borough (1102237) 23-176 23 Development $102,340 $102,000 Key - Community Comp. Rec. & Park Plan BRC-TAG- Region 1 Ambler Borough (4438) 8-16 08 Planning $10,400 $10,000 Key - Community American Littoral Upper & Middle Soc/Delaware Neshaminy Watershed BRC-RCP- Region 1 Riverkeeper Network Plan (3337) 6-9 06 Planning $62,500 $62,500 Key - Rivers Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste d Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type d Award Allocatio Funding Types Valley View Park - Development BRC-PRD- Region 1 Aston Township (1100582) 21-114 21 Development $184,000 $164,000 Key - Community Comp.
  • The Schuylkill River Trail from the Past to the Present

    The Schuylkill River Trail from the Past to the Present

    M O N T G O M E R Y C O U N T Y P A T R A I L S Y S T E M The Schuylkill River Trail From the past to the present. From the historic river Extension. For those seeking public transportation to the trail, towns of Conshohocken, Norristown, and Pottstown to the SEPTA offers excellent access via regional rail service and bus rolling hills of Valley Forge National Historical Park. The lines in Miquon, Spring Mill, Conshohocken, and Norristown. Schuylkill River Trail in Montgomery County takes visitors Visit www.montcopa.org/schuylkillrivertrail for more through a rich blend of natural, cultural, and historical information or contact Montgomery County Division of Parks, resources. The trail runs through a variety of urban, Trails, & Historic Sites at 610.278.3555. suburban, and rural landscapes, offering nearly 20 miles to hikers, joggers, bicyclists, equestrians, and in-line skaters. Trail Rules The Schuylkill River Trail (SRT) is the spine of the • Trail speed limit is 15 mph Schuylkill River National and State Heritage Corridor. When completed, the trail will run over 100 miles from the coal region • Trail is open dawn to dusk of Schuylkill County to the Delaware River in Philadelphia. • No unauthorized motor vehicles are permitted on trail Evidence of several centuries of industrial use remains • Dogs must be leashed where river and canal navigation, quarrying of limestone and • Owners are responsible for cleaning up all pet waste iron ore, and production of iron and steel have succeeded each • No littering—please practice “Carry In - Carry Out” other as mainstays of this region’s economy.
  • Hiking Calendar

    Hiking Calendar

    President’s Message Moving Forward ow quickly man-made “structures,” David S. Marsh and Construction, and Director of Trail on which we have conditioned Maintenance. The existing position of Vice H ourselves to rely, can change. Like President of Trail Protection will assume trees in a forest after a microburst, we have responsibility for landowner relations, and watched as financial institutions and major the FLTC office will expand its corporations, flawed from mismanagement, responsibilities for data base management snapped and tumbled. A warming climate and other trail data tasks. I believe this new threatens the natural world we hold dear and organization structure will provide a more the very existence of future generations of effective Board focus on the critical task of living creatures. We are shaken to our very keeping the FLT fully operational and in roots, but out of the rubble, new growth excellent condition. We seriously need your begins to appear, and we dare to hope again. help in staffing these new positions and some These are difficult times indeed. All FLTC of the tasks that support them. You may read members and volunteers will be affected. A more about this on page 14. Please step very serious lesson has once again been forward and volunteer. The FLTC must Move learned, that greed is short sighted, our Forward! Photo by Jacqui Wensich strength is in following our fundamental The good news is that more and more people principals, and this earth, while resilient and forgiving, must be are discovering and enjoying the FLT. The bad news is that respected and protected.