Plans for an Interstellar Probe

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Plans for an Interstellar Probe Plans for an Interstellar Probe Ralph L. McNutt, Jr. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Pasadena Convention Center International Academy of Astronautics (IAA) Day Session Room 06 – Room 101 Pasadena, California, USA Saturday 14 July 2018 3:30 PM – 4:00 PM held on the occasion of the 42nd COSPAR Scientific Assembly What is “Interstellar Probe”? • “Interstellar Probe” is a mission through the outer heliosphere and to the nearby “Very Local” interstellar medium or VLISM (0.01 parsecs = ~2,000 AU =~10 light days) • Interstellar Probe uses today’s technology to take the first explicit step on the path of interstellar exploration - Heliosphere: How does the heliosphere interact with our galactic surroundings? - Kuiper Belt Objects: Discover new worlds to understand the origin of our solar system - Circum-Solar Dust Disk: Reveal the unseen 3D dust distribution to understand planetary formation • Interstellar Probe can pave the way, scientifically, technically, and programmatically for longer interstellar journeys that would require future propulsions systems IAA Academy Day 14 July 2018 2 Current Status • The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory has been tasked by the NASA Heliophysics Division to (re-)study the mission (as of 13 June) • Provide science and technical input to help support the next round of “Decadal Surveys” in the United States - Focus on the time frame in the next Decadal: 2023 – 2032: Can we fly then? - Assess the science: Does the case remain compelling? - Assess technical readiness for a launch **NO LATER THAN 2030** • Reach out to the broadest range of scientific and technical stakeholders throughout those communities - This meeting, COSPAR (Monday and Tuesday), the upcoming American Geophysical Union meeting and others - Use the COSPAR Panel on Interstellar Research (PIR) to reach out to the International Community • Conclude this effort in nine months, reporting back to NASA by February 2019 • We need your help and input IAA Academy Day 14 July 2018 3 A Mission a Long Time in the Making IAA Academy Day 14 July 2018 4 …Which Began an Enduring Notion Deep Space Probe* (1965) • 1960: The Space Studies Board “Outer Solar System Probe to be aimed away from Jupiter Galactic Probe* (1967) the Sun…” Pioneer 10/11 (1980) • 1965: Dr E. Parker advocates mission to Voyager (1977) heliospheric boundary region • 1977: Voyager-1 launch New Horizons (2006) • 1990: The Interstellar Probe (Holzer et al., 1990) • 2001: NIAC Study, APL • 2002: JPL Study • 2006: Innovative Interstellar Explorer (Fiehler et al., 2006) • 2009: The Interstellar Heliopause Mission (Wimmer-Schweingruber et al., 2009) • 2015: Keck Institute of Space Studies Parker Solar Probe (2018) (KISS) Report/Proposal Interstellar Probe (<2050) IAA Academy Day 14 July 2018 5 Basic Questions Have Not Changed What is the nature of the nearby interstellar medium? How do the Sun and galaxy affect the dynamics of the heliosphere? What is the structure of the heliosphere? How did matter in the solar system and interstellar medium originate and evolve? IAA Academy Day 14 July 2018 6 Heliosphere Concept: Beginnings Definition of “heliosphere”: “…the region of interplanetary space where the solar wind is flowing supersonically.” Davis (1955) Dessler (1967) Dessler (1967) IAA Academy Day 14 July 2018 7 The Initial View from Voyager • Only Voyager 1 has (likely) passed through the heliopause into interstellar space • Ongoing measurements continue to show variations - Driven by the Sun (inside?) - Driven by the VLISM (outside?) IAA Academy Day 14 July 2018 8 What *IS* New • Remote observations of energetic neutral atoms (ENAs) from the interaction region (IBEX and Cassini) • In situ particle measurements beyond the termination shock (Voyager 1 and 2) • The first detailed look at a Kuiper Belt Object (KBO), namely Pluto, and in situ measurements of pick up ions in the outer heliosphere (New Horizons) IAA Academy Day 14 July 2018 9 The Shape Remains in Debate Parker 1961, Diagram from McComas et al. From Dialynas et al (2017), The bubble-like shape of the heliosphere observed by Voyager and Cassini IAA Academy Day 14 July 2018 10 Interstellar Probe Humanity’s First Explicit Step Into Interstellar Space Target 1: Interstellar Medium and Heliosphere Target 2: Circum-Solar Voyager 1 (Active) Dust Disk Pioneer 11 (Lost) Pioneer 10 (Lost) Interstellar Probe New Horizons (Active) Target 3: Kuiper Belt Objects Voyager 2 (Active) Target 4: “Planet Nine”? IAA Academy Day 14 July 2018 11 Interstellar Probe Targets The Interstellar Medium Exploring new astrophysical plasma conditions governing the shape of our heliosphere, and others. IAA Academy Day 14 July 2018 12 Interstellar Probe Targets Unexplored Worlds of KBOs Flyby images of Pluto revealed exotic plains of frozen nitrogen and dramatic mountains of water-ice bedrock. The dwarf planet, Quaoar is located at 40-50 AU. It in its last stages of losing its methane atmosphere and may have cryo- volcanism (Jewitt et al., 2004). IAA Academy Day 14 July 2018 13 Interstellar Probe Targets Circum-Solar Dust Disk The dust cloud surrounding the solar system is obscured by the zodical dust cloud. Venturing outward will for the first time reveal the circum-solar dust cloud that hold important clues to planetary-system formation and evolution. The spiral pattern above indicates a young planetary system in formation (Grady et al., 2009). IAA Academy Day 14 July 2018 14 Interstellar Probe Targets Planet Nine? Ten? Planet TenNine ~1100 AU ~280 AU Clustering of KBOs in perihelion argument may suggest a presence of a large planet 10 times the mass of Earth with e=0.6 and semimajor axis of 700 AU (Batygin and Brown, The newly discovered 2015 BP519 may 2016). be the first purely trans-Neptunian member of the Planet-Nine-induced high-inclination population (Becker+2018). IAA Academy Day 14 July 2018 15 Interstellar Probe Payload – A First Cut • Mass not to exceed (NTE) ~40 kg • Power NTE ~40 W • Interstellar Medium and HeliospHeric Suite - Particle, Plasma and Magnetic Fields Instrumentation: exploring the new astrophysical conditions governing the shape of our heliosphere The ENA Camera INCA on board the Cassini mission and its second generation version and other astrospheres developed for the ESA JUICE Mission (Krimigis et al., 2004; Mitchell et al., 2016) - ENA Camera: OBtaining the first image of our gloBal heliosphere to understand how we compare with others - Dust Detector: Spatial and size distriBution of circum-solar dust • Imaging Systems - Optical: Fast flyby imaging of KBOs, precision The ZEBRA instrument concept consists of the High- IR Instrument on board astrometry, deep-sky survey resolution Absolute Module (HAM) with a 15 cm Rosetta. telescope, and the Wide-field Absolute Module - Infra Red: Surface imaging, gloBal dust distriBution (WAM) with a 3 cm telescope (Bock et al., 2012). IAA Academy Day 14 July 2018 16 Example Spacecraft Span 250 kg to 500 kg • Pluto/New Horizons • Ulysses • Pioneer 10 478.3 kg 366.7 kg 251.8 kg IAA Academy Day 14 July 2018 17 Propulsion Approaches for Interstellar Probe • High solar system escape speed required • Twice the asymptotic speed of Voyager 1 is ~34 km/s - Now 3.6 AU/year at 141 AU from the Sun – hence twice Voyager 1 speed is 7.2 AU/year ~ 34 km/s • Six times would be over 20 AU per year (less than 1 year to Uranus) • Passive: Launch C3 and unpowered gravity assists • Active: Powered gravity assists and in-space propulsion IAA Academy Day 14 July 2018 18 In-Space Propulsion Does Not Solve the Problem – Underpowered for the Mass • Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP) or the use of Solar Sail Propulsion becomes ineffective outside of ~5 AU at the most (Jupiter’s orbit) • Radioisotope Electric Propulsion (REP) requires ~1 kWe radioisotope power system (RPS) • Nuclear Electric Propulsion (NEP) requires a Prometheus-like nuclear power system (NPS) at half the specific mass (or less) and good for autonomous operation for > 10 years • The current state-of-the-art of all of these technologies has too large a specific mass (mass/power ratio) IAA Academy Day 14 July 2018 19 The SLS Block 1B May be the Solution • Early ”solar probe” (1962) advocated “Saturn C-1 plus H2-F2 stages” • Original “Voyager” program to Mars used Saturn V (1967) • Ames Workshop and NRC study (2008) investigated Ares V • Initial ”cuts” made with SLS with Boeing and KSC Launch Services (2014-2015) IAA Academy Day 14 July 2018 20 Mission Concept(s) Speed, speed, speed • Option 1: Jupiter Gravity Assist (JGA) - Burn all your C3 directly after launch with passive JGA appears most Benefitial - Asymptotic speed ~7.6 AU/year - Required C3: 300 km2/s2 • Option 2: JGA + Oberth Maneuver Near the Sun (“Rendezvous With Rama”) - Reverse JGA to dump angular momentum - Fall in to the Sun without actually hitting the Sun, maximizing your incoming speed - Burn all your fuel at perihelion - Asymptotic speed: up to 8.3 AU/year 2 2 - Required C3 : 110 km /s • You need a BIG ROCKET. IAA Academy Day 14 July 2018 21 The Reality of Interstellar Space Flight Parker Solar Probe Enables an Oberth Maneuver § 1000 AU within 50 years requires 2 RS 892 kg § ∆v=14.6 km/s at 4 RS § or § ∆v=10.3 km/s at 2 RS § Star 48B provides ∆v≤4 km/s 3 RS § We need to at least double this 539 kg 8.3 AU/year 4 RS 293 kg 9.5 RS 153 kg Parker Solar Probe in the clean room at Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory in Laurel, Maryland. 6.7 AU/year IAA Academy Day 14 July 2018 22 Interstellar Probe: Critical Trade-Off Studies • Mass - S/C range 300-800 kg (New Horizons 478.3 kg) - P/L ~40-50 kg (New Horizons 30.4 kg) - Thermal Protection System 150-900 kg (PSP 98.9 kg incl structure) • Power: GPHS RTG is the best we have ever had - Galileo, Cassini, Ulysses - Voyager (MHW RTG) will last to mid-2020’s - Pu-238 production program has turned a corner • Communication: Solid, near-term, tested engineering PSP Thermal Protection System being installed in the large vacuum chamber at GSFC.
Recommended publications
  • Copyrighted Material
    Index Abulfeda crater chain (Moon), 97 Aphrodite Terra (Venus), 142, 143, 144, 145, 146 Acheron Fossae (Mars), 165 Apohele asteroids, 353–354 Achilles asteroids, 351 Apollinaris Patera (Mars), 168 achondrite meteorites, 360 Apollo asteroids, 346, 353, 354, 361, 371 Acidalia Planitia (Mars), 164 Apollo program, 86, 96, 97, 101, 102, 108–109, 110, 361 Adams, John Couch, 298 Apollo 8, 96 Adonis, 371 Apollo 11, 94, 110 Adrastea, 238, 241 Apollo 12, 96, 110 Aegaeon, 263 Apollo 14, 93, 110 Africa, 63, 73, 143 Apollo 15, 100, 103, 104, 110 Akatsuki spacecraft (see Venus Climate Orbiter) Apollo 16, 59, 96, 102, 103, 110 Akna Montes (Venus), 142 Apollo 17, 95, 99, 100, 102, 103, 110 Alabama, 62 Apollodorus crater (Mercury), 127 Alba Patera (Mars), 167 Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP), 110 Aldrin, Edwin (Buzz), 94 Apophis, 354, 355 Alexandria, 69 Appalachian mountains (Earth), 74, 270 Alfvén, Hannes, 35 Aqua, 56 Alfvén waves, 35–36, 43, 49 Arabia Terra (Mars), 177, 191, 200 Algeria, 358 arachnoids (see Venus) ALH 84001, 201, 204–205 Archimedes crater (Moon), 93, 106 Allan Hills, 109, 201 Arctic, 62, 67, 84, 186, 229 Allende meteorite, 359, 360 Arden Corona (Miranda), 291 Allen Telescope Array, 409 Arecibo Observatory, 114, 144, 341, 379, 380, 408, 409 Alpha Regio (Venus), 144, 148, 149 Ares Vallis (Mars), 179, 180, 199 Alphonsus crater (Moon), 99, 102 Argentina, 408 Alps (Moon), 93 Argyre Basin (Mars), 161, 162, 163, 166, 186 Amalthea, 236–237, 238, 239, 241 Ariadaeus Rille (Moon), 100, 102 Amazonis Planitia (Mars), 161 COPYRIGHTED
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2006.00776V1 [Physics.Space-Ph] 1 Jun 2020
    manuscript submitted to Geophysical Research Letters Dust impact voltage signatures on Parker Solar Probe: influence of spacecraft floating potential S. D. Bale1,2, K. Goetz3, J. W. Bonnell1, A. W. Case4, C. H. K. Chen5,T. Dudok de Wit6, L. C. Gasque1,2, P. R. Harvey1, J. C. Kasper 7,4, P. J. Kellogg3, R. J. MacDowall8, M. Maksimovic9, D. M. Malaspina10, B. F. Page1,2, M. Pulupa1, M. L. Stevens4, J. R. Szalay11, A. Zaslavsky9 1Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-7450, USA 2Physics Department, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-7300, USA 3School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 55455, USA 4Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA 5School of Physics and Astronomy, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK 6LPC2E, CNRS and University of Orleans,´ Orleans,´ France 7Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA 8Solar System Exploration Division, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, 20771 9LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, Universit PSL, CNRS, Sorbonne Universit, Universit de Paris, 5 place Jules Janssen, 92195 Meudon, France 10Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80303, USA 11Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA Key Points: • The Parker Solar Probe (PSP) FIELDS instrument measures millisecond volt- ages impulses associated with dust impacts • The sign of the largest monopole voltage response is a function of the spacecraft floating potential • These measurements are consistent with models of dynamic charge balance following dust impacts Submitted : June 2, 2020 arXiv:2006.00776v1 [physics.space-ph] 1 Jun 2020 Corresponding author: Stuart D.
    [Show full text]
  • OUTER PLANET SPACECRAFT TEMPERATURE TESTING and ANALYSIS by Alan R
    OUTER PLANET SPACECRAFT TEMPERATURE TESTING AND ANALYSIS by Alan R. Hoffman and Arturo Avila Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Califomia Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Dr. Pasadena, CA 91 109 USA Email: [email protected].,yov, Arturo.Avila @iuLnasa.nov Unmanned spacecraft flown on missions to the outer planets of the solar system have included flybys, planetary orbiters, and atmospheric probes during the last three decades. The thermal design, test, and analysis approach applied to these spacecraft evolved from the passive thermal designs applied to the earlier lunar and interplanetary spacecraft. The inflight temperature data from representative sets of engineering subsystems and science instruments from a subset of these spacecraft are compared to those obtained during the ground test programs and from the prelaunch predictions. The ground testing programs applied to all of these missions are characterized by: a) thermal development test activity for areas where there were significant thermal uncertainties, b) rigorous “black box level” environmental temperature testing program for the electronics and mechanisms which included a long dwell time at a hot temperature in vacuum, and c) comprehensive solar thermal vacuum test program on the flight spacecraft. Several lessons are presented with specific recommendations for considerations for new projects to aid in the planning of cost effective temperature design, test, and analysis programs. 1. INTRODUCTION The exploration of the outer planets (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune) using unmanned remote sensing spacecraft has occurred during the latter part of the 20th century and continues in the early part of the 21’‘ century. The scientific data obtained has included spectacular pictures of Jupiter and its bands and of Saturn and its rings.
    [Show full text]
  • Breakthrough Propulsion Study Assessing Interstellar Flight Challenges and Prospects
    Breakthrough Propulsion Study Assessing Interstellar Flight Challenges and Prospects NASA Grant No. NNX17AE81G First Year Report Prepared by: Marc G. Millis, Jeff Greason, Rhonda Stevenson Tau Zero Foundation Business Office: 1053 East Third Avenue Broomfield, CO 80020 Prepared for: NASA Headquarters, Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD) and NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC) Washington, DC 20546 June 2018 Millis 2018 Grant NNX17AE81G_for_CR.docx pg 1 of 69 ABSTRACT Progress toward developing an evaluation process for interstellar propulsion and power options is described. The goal is to contrast the challenges, mission choices, and emerging prospects for propulsion and power, to identify which prospects might be more advantageous and under what circumstances, and to identify which technology details might have greater impacts. Unlike prior studies, the infrastructure expenses and prospects for breakthrough advances are included. This first year's focus is on determining the key questions to enable the analysis. Accordingly, a work breakdown structure to organize the information and associated list of variables is offered. A flow diagram of the basic analysis is presented, as well as more detailed methods to convert the performance measures of disparate propulsion methods into common measures of energy, mass, time, and power. Other methods for equitable comparisons include evaluating the prospects under the same assumptions of payload, mission trajectory, and available energy. Missions are divided into three eras of readiness (precursors, era of infrastructure, and era of breakthroughs) as a first step before proceeding to include comparisons of technology advancement rates. Final evaluation "figures of merit" are offered. Preliminary lists of mission architectures and propulsion prospects are provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Science: Planetary Science Outyears Are Notional
    Science: Planetary Science Outyears are notional ($M) 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Planetary Science $2,235 $2,200 $2,181 $2,162 $2,143 Ø Creates a robotic Lunar Discovery and Exploration program, that supports commercial partnerships and innovative approaches to achieving human and science exploration goals. Ø Continues development of Mars 2020 and Europa Clipper. Ø Establishes a Planetary Defense program, including the Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) and Near-Earth Object Observations. Ø Studies a potential Mars Sample Return mission incorporating commercial partnerships. Ø Formulates the Lucy and Psyche missions. Ø Selects the next New Frontiers mission. Ø Invests in CubeSats/SmallSats that can achieve entirely new science at lower cost. Ø Operates 10 Planetary missions. § OSIRIS-REx will map asteroid Bennu. § New Horizons will fly by its Kuiper belt target. Dawn Image of Ceres on January 13, 2015 20 Science: Astrophysics Outyears are notional ($M) 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Astrophysics $1,185 $1,185 $1,185 $1,185 $1,185 Ø Launches the James Webb Space Telescope. Ø Moves Webb into the Cosmic Origins Program within the Astrophysics Account. Ø Terminates WFIRST due to its significant cost and higher priorities elsewhere within NASA. Increases funding for future competed missions and research. Ø Supports the TESS exoplanet mission following launch by June 2018. Ø Formulates or develops, IXPE, GUSTO, XARM, Euclid, and a new MIDEX mission to be selected in FY 2019. Ø Operates ten missions and the balloon project. Ø Invests in CubeSats/SmallSats that can achieve entirely new science at lower cost. Ø All Astrophysics missions beyond prime operations (including SOFIA) will be subject to senior review in 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • The Voyager Program ______
    Astronomy Cast Episode 199 The Voyager Program ________________________________________________________________________ Fraser: Astronomy Cast Episode 199 for Monday September 20, 2010, The Voyager Program. Welcome to Astronomy Cast, our weekly facts-based journey through the cosmos, where we help you understand not only what we know, but how we know what we know. My name is Fraser Cain, I'm the publisher of Universe Today, and with me is Dr. Pamela Gay, a professor at Southern Illinois University Edwardsville. Hi, Pamela, how are you doing? Pamela: I’m doing well, how are you doing, Fraser? Fraser: Great. 199... that’s really close to 200! Pamela: Yes, yes it is. Fraser: I know a lot of people want us to do something special for 200, but I don’t know. We’ll have to think of something. Either that, or you can just, you know, explain how to do gravitational mathematics. Everyone get pen and paper out... Pamela: No, there are some things I like myself too much to do. Explaining tensor calculus falls into that category. Fraser: Over the radio... Pamela: Over the radio, yes... Fraser: Alright, so launched in 1977, the twin Voyager spacecraft were sent to explore the outer planets... Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. Because of a unique alignment of the planets, Voyager II was the first spacecraft to ever make a close approach to Uranus and Neptune. Let’s take a look back at this amazing program and see where the spacecraft are today. And I wanted to add that “are today” because they’re still going! Pamela: I know..
    [Show full text]
  • Why NASA Consistently Fails at Congress
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 6-2013 The Wrong Right Stuff: Why NASA Consistently Fails at Congress Andrew Follett College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Follett, Andrew, "The Wrong Right Stuff: Why NASA Consistently Fails at Congress" (2013). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 584. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/584 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Wrong Right Stuff: Why NASA Consistently Fails at Congress A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Bachelors of Arts in Government from The College of William and Mary by Andrew Follett Accepted for . John Gilmour, Director . Sophia Hart . Rowan Lockwood Williamsburg, VA May 3, 2013 1 Table of Contents: Acknowledgements 3 Part 1: Introduction and Background 4 Pre Soviet Collapse: Early American Failures in Space 13 Pre Soviet Collapse: The Successful Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo Programs 17 Pre Soviet Collapse: The Quasi-Successful Shuttle Program 22 Part 2: The Thin Years, Repeated Failure in NASA in the Post-Soviet Era 27 The Failure of the Space Exploration Initiative 28 The Failed Vision for Space Exploration 30 The Success of Unmanned Space Flight 32 Part 3: Why NASA Fails 37 Part 4: Putting this to the Test 87 Part 5: Changing the Method.
    [Show full text]
  • On Parker Solar Probe, NASA Leaves the Driving to Aerojet Rocketdyne
    On Parker Solar Probe, NASA Leaves the Driving to Aerojet Rocketdyne August 12, 2018 KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, Fla., Aug. 12, 2018 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- With a big assist from Aerojet Rocketdyne, NASA’s Parker Solar Probe is now on its way to humankind’s closest encounter ever with a star – in this case our solar system’s sun. Parker Solar Probe NASA image Aerojet Rocketdyne provided the full propulsion system on NASA’s Parker Solar Probe, which will venture eight times closer to the Sun than the previous record holderCredit: NASA/Johns Hopkins APL In addition to the RS-68A main engines for the United Launch Alliance Delta IV Heavy rocket that launched the Parker Probe into space, Aerojet Rocketdyne also supplied the RL10B-2 second stage engine and 12 MR-106 reaction control thrusters on the Delta Cryogenic Second Stage, as well as the full propulsion system on the Parker Solar Probe. The nearly 7-year journey will bring the probe to within 6.2 million kilometers of the Sun’s surface. That’s well within the orbit of the Sun’s nearest planet, Mercury, and eight times closer than the previous record holder, the U.S.-German Helios B probe, which made its closest approach in 1976. “Surviving a years-long journey to the corona of the Sun while operating in autonomous mode requires an incredibly high level of reliability,” said Aerojet Rocketdyne CEO and President Eileen Drake. “Aerojet Rocketdyne propulsion plays a critical role in all aspects of the Parker Solar Probe mission, from launch on the Delta IV, to the probe’s safe cruise through space and approach of the Sun’s atmosphere.” The Parker Solar Probe ultimately will dip into the Sun’s corona, carrying instruments to observe and measure the movement and interaction of phenomena including electric and magnetic fields, energetic particles and solar wind.
    [Show full text]
  • Forever Remembered
    July 2015 Vol. 2 No. 7 National Aeronautics and Space Administration KENNEDY SPACE CENTER’S magazine FOREVER REMEMBERED Earth Solar Aeronautics Mars Technology Right ISS System & Research Now Beyond NASA’S National Aeronautics and Space Administration LAUNCH KENNEDY SPACE CENTER’S SCHEDULE SPACEPORT MAGAZINE Date: July 3, 12:55 a.m. EDT Mission: Progress 60P Cargo Craft CONTENTS Description: In early July, the Progress 60P resupply vehicle — 4 �������������������Solemn shuttle exhibit shares enduring lessons an automated, unpiloted version of the Soyuz spacecraft that is used to ����������������Flyby will provide best ever view of Pluto 10 bring supplies and fuel — launches 14 ����������������New Horizons spacecraft hones in on Pluto to the International Space Station. http://go.nasa.gov/1HUAYbO 24 ����������������Firing Room 4 used for RESOLVE mission simulation Date: July 22, 5:02 p.m. EDT 28 ����������������SpaceX, NASA will rebound from CRS-7 loss Mission: Expedition 44 Launch to 29 ����������������Backup docking adapter to replace lost IDA-1 the ISS Description: In late July, Kjell SHUN FUJIMURA 31 ����������������Thermal Protection System Facility keeping up Lindgren of NASA, Kimiya Yui of JAXA and Oleg Kononenko of am an education specialist in the Education Projects and 35 ����������������New crew access tower takes shape at Cape Roscosmos launch aboard a Soyuz I Youth Engagement Office. I work to inspire students to pursue science, technology, engineering, mathematics, or 36 ����������������Innovative thinking converts repair site into garden spacecraft from the Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan to the STEM, careers and with teachers to better integrate STEM 38 ����������������Proposals in for new class of launch services space station.
    [Show full text]
  • Deuterium – Tritium Pulse Propulsion with Hydrogen As Propellant and the Entire Space-Craft As a Gigavolt Capacitor for Ignition
    Deuterium – Tritium pulse propulsion with hydrogen as propellant and the entire space-craft as a gigavolt capacitor for ignition. By F. Winterberg University of Nevada, Reno Abstract A deuterium-tritium (DT) nuclear pulse propulsion concept for fast interplanetary transport is proposed utilizing almost all the energy for thrust and without the need for a large radiator: 1. By letting the thermonuclear micro-explosion take place in the center of a liquid hydrogen sphere with the radius of the sphere large enough to slow down and absorb the neutrons of the DT fusion reaction, heating the hydrogen to a fully ionized plasma at a temperature of ~ 105 K. 2. By using the entire spacecraft as a magnetically insulated gigavolt capacitor, igniting the DT micro-explosion with an intense GeV ion beam discharging the gigavolt capacitor, possible if the space craft has the topology of a torus. 1. Introduction The idea to use the 80% of the neutron energy released in the DT fusion reaction for nuclear micro-bomb rocket propulsion, by surrounding the micro-explosion with a thick layer of liquid hydrogen heated up to 105 K thereby becoming part of the exhaust, was first proposed by the author in 1971 [1]. Unlike the Orion pusher plate concept, the fire ball of the fully ionized hydrogen plasma can here be reflected by a magnetic mirror. The 80% of the energy released into 14MeV neutrons cannot be reflected by a magnetic mirror for thermonuclear micro-bomb propulsion. This was the reason why for the Project Daedalus interstellar probe study of the British Interplanetary Society [2], the neutron poor deuterium-helium 3 (DHe3) reaction was chosen.
    [Show full text]
  • The Active Region Source of a Type III Radio Storm Observed by Parker Solar Probe During Encounter 2 Log-Spaced Chunks, Each of 2.56 Mhz Wide
    Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. ISSI_E2_Hinode-final ©ESO 2021 February 10, 2021 The active region source of a type III radio storm observed by Parker Solar Probe during Encounter 2 L. Harra1, 2, D. H. Brooks3, S. D. Bale4, C. H. Mandrini5, 6, K. Barczynski1, 2, R. Sharma7, S. T. Badman4, S. Vargas Domínguez8, and M. Pulupa4 1 PMOD/WRC, Dorfstrasse 33 CH-7260 Davos Dorf, Switzerland e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] 2 ETH-Zurich, Hönggerberg campus, HIT building, Zürich, Switzerland 3 College of Science, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA e-mail: [email protected] 4 Physics Department and Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, USA. 94720-7450 e-mail: [email protected] 5 Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio (IAFE), CONICET-UBA, Buenos Aires, Argentina 6 Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (FCEN), UBA, Buenos Aires, Argentina e-mail: [email protected] 7 Fachhochschule Nordwestschweiz (FHNW), Bahnhofstrasse 6, 5210 Windisch, Switzerland e-mail: [email protected] 8 Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Observatorio Astronómico Nacional, Bogotá, Colombia e-mail: [email protected] Received September 2020 ABSTRACT Context. To investigate the source of a type III radio burst storm during encounter 2 of NASA’s Parker Solar Probe (PSP) mission. Aims. It was observed that in encounter 2 of NASA’s Parker Solar Probe mission there was a large amount of radio activity, and in particular a noise storm of frequent, small type III bursts from 31st March to 6th April 2019. Our aim is to investigate the source of these small and frequent bursts.
    [Show full text]
  • Delta IV Parker Solar Probe Mission Booklet
    A United Launch Alliance (ULA) Delta IV Heavy what is the source of high-energy solar particles. MISSION rocket will deliver NASA’s Parker Solar Probe to Parker Solar Probe will make 24 elliptical orbits an interplanetary trajectory to the sun. Liftoff of the sun and use seven flybys of Venus to will occur from Space Launch Complex-37 at shrink the orbit closer to the sun during the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida. NASA seven-year mission. selected ULA’s Delta IV Heavy for its unique MISSION ability to deliver the necessary energy to begin The probe will fly seven times closer to the the Parker Solar Probe’s journey to the sun. sun than any spacecraft before, a mere 3.9 million miles above the surface which is about 4 OVERVIEW The Parker percent the distance from the sun to the Earth. Solar Probe will At its closest approach, Parker Solar Probe will make repeated reach a top speed of 430,000 miles per hour journeys into the or 120 miles per second, making it the fastest sun’s corona and spacecraft in history. The incredible velocity trace the flow of is necessary so that the spacecraft does not energy to answer fall into the sun during the close approaches. fundamental Temperatures will climb to 2,500 degrees questions such Fahrenheit, but the science instruments will as why the solar remain at room temperature behind a 4.5-inch- atmosphere is thick carbon composite shield. dramatically Image courtesy of NASA hotter than the The mission was named in honor of Dr.
    [Show full text]