PAJ71-Color/No.01 Barlow

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PAJ71-Color/No.01 Barlow STUDIO AS STUDY A Selection of Drawings by American Video Artists Edited, with an Introduction, by Melinda Barlow rawing, that intimate act of the hand often perceived as the most basic skill an artist must possess, was once described as “the bearing mother of all arts D and sciences.”1 Ingres insisted that drawing was “three quarters of painting,” while Cézanne refused to distinguish between the two media. “When one paints,” he wrote, “one draws.” Sculpture has had its share of master draftsmen, like Rodin, and yet sculptor’s drawings, like those by architects, are frequently seen to be purely utilitarian, because they lead to a three-dimensional final product, and reveal a process of conceptual trial and error. “A means of finding your way about things,” as Henry Moore put it, drawings are a way of envisioning possibilities. In the mid-twentieth century, drawing was radically reinvented by artists as different as Jackson Pollock and Sol LeWitt. Pollock uniquely fused drawing with painting, his energetic lines of paint literally flying off the canvas, while LeWitt redefined the idea of the commission, and moved the act of drawing from the page to the wall. Through written instructions or “scores” describing precise arrangements of lines ultimately executed by others, LeWitt forged a sensual partnership between drawing and architecture, and helped transform the traditional notion of the studio. Often a place where a work is crafted by hand in paint or clay, in the mid-1960s the studio developed a paper counterpart, the studio on the page, or in a notebook, where a work is crafted conceptually, as an idea. When art critic Lucy Lippard noted in 1968 that “the studio is again becoming a study,” it was this phenomenon that she was trying to describe.2 As art gradually “dematerialized,” drawings of happen- ings, performances, environments, and video installations became fascinating documents of works ultimately, if temporarily, realized in physical form. With a title evoking Lippard’s insight, “Studio as Study: A Selection of Drawings by American Video Artists,” explores the various roles drawing has played during the last 35 years of video history. It brings together drawings by 15 artists of different ages and orientations, from pioneers of the medium to members of the latest generation, from makers of single-channel tapes to multi-channel installations, from those with backgrounds in anthropology and photography to those trained in sculpture and painting. The resulting portfolio, extraordinary in its range of styles © 2002 Performing Arts Journal, Inc. PAJ 71 (2002), pp. 1–33. ᭿ 1 Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/152028102760049292 by guest on 25 September 2021 and moods, contains drawings that are personal and expressive as well as technical and utilitarian—drawings which reveal the agility of the moving hand and the ingenuity of the thinking mind. To contribute to this collection, each artist was asked to submit a drawing from any period of his or her work, past or present, along with a statement describing that particular work, or explaining how and why he or she has used drawings. The pages which follow contain these things and more, including excerpts from the audio text used in an installation resembling a computer play-station (Julia Scher), a phonetic cue card serving as both drawing and statement (Gary Hill), and images which expand the definition of drawing, dissociating it from an activity performed by the human hand and locating it in the waveform possibilities programmed in a machine (Woody Vasulka). For some of these artists, drawing has been a fundamental and continuous part of the creative process. Joan Jonas describes drawing as a basic graphic element, one she often incorporates into live action performances. Chip Lord carries a pocket sketchbook whenever he travels, and Sadie Benning doodles, sometimes while editing. Mary Lucier and Bill Viola produce volumes of hand-drawn material, creating extensive paper trails for virtually every work. Some artists, however, feel that drawing should not be limited to an arrangement of lines on a page. Jonas distances drawing’s intimacy by showing the process live, on closed-circuit monitors; and Tony Oursler calls the whole series of “primary hand-made images, props, sets, installations and videotapes” presented in a recently published catalogue drawings, perhaps because they are preliminary ways of trying out ideas.3 Many drawings included in this portfolio reflect important moments in video history, reveal basic aspects of working with the technology, or take the medium itself as their explicit subject. Ann Woodward’s whimsical illustrations for The Spaghetti City Video Manual and for a fable about a pirate cable TV station, for example, are reminders of the interest in community access pioneered by collectives like Videofreex, of which she was a member, while Beryl Korot’s delicate picto- graphic notations, elegant in their precision, were used to create a score for multiple channel editing. Especially rich with historical significance is the invocation by Peter Campus of Douglas Davis’s famous claim, in a “Manifesto” from 1974, that “the camera is a pencil”—an essential hand-held tool for communication.4 To make the drawing included here, Campus used a stylus and digitizing tablet, basic input devices for the computer which recall the oldest of writing implements, the stylus and wax tablet. And in Poetic (Coda) # 13 (1997) by Tony Oursler and Untitled (1998) by Sadie Benning, both reproduced in this introduction, the video medium itself is the subject of composition. Oursler’s ironic still life gives us a product: the familiar plastic box used to hold videotapes, hovering behind a snaking line reminiscent of videotape as it unwinds, while Benning’s sketch of a phantom silhouette both inside and outside the lens of a camcorder suggests an interface between reality and image, of humanity and the machine. 2 ᭿ PAJ 71 Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/152028102760049292 by guest on 25 September 2021 Tony Oursler, Poetic (Coda) # 13 (1997). Photo: Courtesy of the artist. Sadie Benning, Untitled (1998). Photo: Courtesy of the artist. BARLOW et al. / Studio as Study ᭿ 3 Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/152028102760049292 by guest on 25 September 2021 Other drawings in this portfolio reveal different aspects of the changing relationship between humanity and technology, redefine the idea of the commission, and expose the continuing legacy of conceptual art. Rita Myers likens the advent of the computer to that of the Sony Portapak, pointing out that software now enables one to generate many slightly different versions of the same drawing, and that this radically changes the meaning of making a preliminary “study.”5 (It also changes, once again, the meaning of the studio, giving it a new incarnation in cyberspace.) Myers’s elevation and axonometric drawings for Correspondences: Day into Night into Day (1992), like Julia Scher’s lighting plot for Wonderland (1998) and Diana Thater’s perspective drawing for Delphine (2000), were commissioned by architects and designers. Thater’s drawing, however, includes hand-collaged elements on its borders: dynamic shapes indicating the placement of projections in space, and pantone strips providing a patchwork of the installation’s color scheme. Chip Lord’s sketches for Picture Windows (1990), and Doug Hall’s installation Terminal Landscape (1995) reveal the legacy of conceptual art. As Lord explains in his statement, one of the drawings included here contains an idea he ultimately did not use. As LeWitt noted in his 12th sentence on conceptual art, “For each work of art that becomes physical, there are many variations that do not.” Hall asked his students to make drawings in response to a written description of a photograph. He then took a group of these drawings and used them in a larger mixed-media installation of his own conception that explored the role of mass media in contemporary society. While many books have focused on drawings by painters, architects, and sculptors, and while drawings by individual video artists have been included in a number of recent collections and catalogues, drawings by a range of video artists have rarely, if ever, been considered as a subject unto themselves.6 This portfolio therefore provides a rare opportunity at a key moment, for drawing is currently experiencing a resurgence, as witnessed by a show at the Barbara Gladstone Gallery in New York in the summer of 2000 featuring more than 100 drawings by artists working in different media.7 The selection of drawings assembled here aims at similar breadth on a smaller scale, and likewise celebrates drawing’s continued intimate pleasures. From Mary Lucier’s atmospheric pastel sketch of a lithe female figure flipping through the air, used to pre-visualize a video-dance performance; to Bill Viola’s hand-written notations for the creation of a primitive “scale”; to Gary Hill’s phonetic cue card that transforms language into a mysterious code (used by actors in a tape exploring Gregory Bateson’s concept of the metalogue)—the drawings included here demonstrate tremendous range, versatility, and vitality. Unique conduits to the creative process, they also implicitly issue a call to experience each work live, or in object form—as tape, installation, projection, or performance—and then to ponder further the fascinating relationship between each drawing and the work it prefigured. 4 ᭿ PAJ 71 Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/152028102760049292 by guest on 25 September 2021 NOTES 1. Gerhard of Brugge, An introduction to the general art of drawing (1674), quoted in Susan Lambert, Reading Drawings (New York: Pantheon, 1984), 9. 2. Lucy Lippard, “The Dematerialization of Art,” in Changing: Essays in Art Criticism (New York: E.P.
Recommended publications
  • The Artist's Voice Since 1981 Bombsite
    THE ARTIST’S VOICE SINCE 1981 BOMBSITE Peter Campus by John Hanhardt BOMB 68/Summer 1999, ART Peter Campus. Shadow Projection, 1974, video installation. Courtesy Paula Cooper Gallery. My visit with Peter Campus was partially motivated by my desire to see his new work, a set of videotapes entitled Video Ergo Sum that includes Dreams, Steps and Karneval und Jude. These new works proved to be an extraordinary extension of Peter’s earlier engagement with video and marked his renewed commitment to the medium. Along with Vito Acconci, Dara Birnbaum, Gary Hill, Joan Jonas, Bruce Nauman, Nam June Paik, Steina and Woody Vasulka, and Bill Viola, Peter is one of the central artists in the history of the transformation of video into an art form. He holds a distinctive place in contemporary American art through a body of work distinguished by its articulation of a sophisticated poetics of image making dialectically linked to an incisive and subtle exploration of the properties of different media—videotape, video installations, photography, photographic slide installations and digital photography. The video installations and videotapes he created between 1971 and 1978 considered the fashioning of the self through the artist’s and spectator’s relationship to image making. Campus’s investigations into the apparatus of the video system and the relationship of the 1 of 16 camera to the space it occupied were elaborated in a series of installations. In mem [1975], the artist turned the camera onto the body of the specator and then projected the resulting image at an angle onto the gallery wall.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Art in Enterprise
    Report from the EU H2020 Research and Innovation Project Artsformation: Mobilising the Arts for an Inclusive Digital Transformation The Role of Art in Enterprise Tom O’Dea, Ana Alacovska, and Christian Fieseler This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 870726. Report of the EU H2020 Research Project Artsformation: Mobilising the Arts for an Inclusive Digital Transformation State-of-the-art literature review on the role of Art in enterprise Tom O’Dea1, Ana Alacovska2, and Christian Fieseler3 1 Trinity College, Dublin 2 Copenhagen Business School 3 BI Norwegian Business School This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 870726 Suggested citation: O’Dea, T., Alacovska, A., and Fieseler, C. (2020). The Role of Art in Enterprise. Artsformation Report Series, available at: (SSRN) https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3716274 About Artsformation: Artsformation is a Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation project that explores the intersection between arts, society and technology Arts- formation aims to understand, analyse, and promote the ways in which the arts can reinforce the social, cultural, economic, and political benefits of the digital transformation. Artsformation strives to support and be part of the process of making our communities resilient and adaptive in the 4th Industrial Revolution through research, innovation and applied artistic practice. To this end, the project organizes arts exhibitions, host artist assemblies, creates new artistic methods to impact the digital transformation positively and reviews the scholarly and practi- cal state of the arts.
    [Show full text]
  • Optical Timeline by Tony Oursler
    Optical Timeline by Tony Oursler 1 Iris is thought to be derived from the RED Symyaz leads the fallen angels. Archimedes (c. 287212 b.c.) is said to Greek word for speaker or messenger. According to Enoch, they came to earth have used a large magnifying lens or Seth, the Egyptian god most associated of their own free will at Mount Hermon, burning-glass, which focused the suns Fifth century b.c. Chinese philosopher with evil, is depicted in many guises: descending like stars. This description rays, to set fire to Roman ships off Mo Ti, in the first description of the gives rise to the name Lucifer, “giver of Syracuse. camera obscura, refers to the pinhole as a black pig, a tall, double-headed figure light.” “collection place” and “locked treasure with a snout, and a serpent. Sometimes And now there is no longer any “I have seen Satan fall like lightning room.” he is black, a positive color for the difficulty in understanding the images in from heaven.” (Luke 10:1820) Egyptians, symbolic of the deep tones of mirrors and in all smooth and bright Platos Cave depicts the dilemma of fertile river deposits; at other times he is surfaces. The fires from within and from the uneducated in a graphic tableau of red, a negative color reflected by the without communicate about the smooth light and shadow. The shackled masses parched sands that encroach upon the surface, and from one image which is are kept in shadow, unable to move crops. Jeffrey Burton Russell suggests variously refracted.
    [Show full text]
  • Kino, Carol. “Rebel Form Gains Favor. Fights Ensue.,” the New York Times, March 10, 2010
    Kino, Carol. “Rebel Form Gains Favor. Fights Ensue.,” The New York Times, March 10, 2010. By CAROL KINO Published: March 10, 2010 ONE snowy night last month, as New Yorkers rushed home in advance of a coming blizzard, more than a hundred artists, scholars and curators crowded into the boardroom of the Museum of Modern Art to talk about performance art and how it can be preserved and exhibited. The event — the eighth in a series of private Performance Workshops that the museum has mounted in the last two years — would have been even more packed if it weren’t for the weather, said Klaus Biesenbach, one of its hosts and the newly appointed director of the P.S.1 Contemporary Art Center. After seeing the R.S.V.P. list, he had “freaked out,” he said, and worried all day about overflow crowds. As it was, he and his co-host, Jenny Schlenzka, the assistant curator of performance art at the museum, were surrounded at the conference table by a Who’s Who of performance-art history, including Marina Abramovic, the 1970s performance goddess from Belgrade whose retrospective, “The Artist Is Present,” opens Sunday atMoMA; the much younger Tino Sehgal, whose latest show of “constructed situations,” as he terms them, just closed at the Guggenheim Museum; Joan Jonas, a conceptual and video art pioneer of the late 1960s who usually creates installations that mix performance with video, drawing and objects; and Alison Knowles, a founding member of the Fluxus movement who is known for infinitely repeatable events involving communal meals and foodstuffs.
    [Show full text]
  • Paul Robeson Galleries
    Paul Robeson Galleries Exhibitions 1979 Green Magic April 9 – June 29, 1979 An exhibition consisting of two parts: Green Magic I and Green Magic II. Green Magic I displayed useful plants of northern New Jersey, including history, properties, and myths. Green Magic II displayed plant forms in art of the ‘70’s. Includes the work of Carolyn Brady, Brad Davis, Jim Dine, Tina Girouard, George Green, Hanna Kay, Bob Kushner, Ree Morton, Joseph Raffael, Ned Smyth, Pat Steir, George Sugarman, Fumio Yoshimura, and Barbara Zucker. Senior Thesis Exhibition May 7 – June 1, 1979 An annual exhibition of work by graduating Fine Arts seniors from Rutgers – Newark. Includes the work of Hugo Bastidas, Connie Bower, K. Stacey Clarke, Joseph Clarke, Stephen Delceg, Rose Mary Gonnella, Jean Hom, John Johnstone, Mathilda Munier, Susan Rothauser, Michael Rizzo, Ulana Salewycz, Carol Somers Kathryn M. Walsh. Jazz Images June 19 – September 14, 1979 An exhibition displaying the work of black photographers photographing jazz. The show focused on the Institute of Jazz Studies of Rutgers University and contemporary black photographers who use jazz musicians and their environment as subject matter. The aim of the exhibition was to emphasize the importance of jazz as a serious art form and to familiarize the general public with the Jazz Institute. The black photographers whose work was exhibited were chosen because their compositions specifically reflect personal interpretations of the jazz idiom. Includes the work of Anthony Barboza, Rahman Batin, Leroy Henderson, Milt Hinton, and Chuck Stewart. Paul Robeson Campus Center Rutgers – The State University of New Jersey 350 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Bailly 1 Invisible Culture Issue 11, Fall 2007 Artist-Curators and Art Historian-Curators at the Edge
    Bailly 1 Artist-Curators and Art Historian-Curators at the Edge: How the “Modern West” Revealed Boundaries of Curatorial Practice Austen Barron Bailly This paper takes as it starting point two related projects: The Modern West: American Landscapes, 1890-1950 (October 2006-June 2007) and “Two Edges” (April 12, 2007). The Modern West was a major exhibition curated for Museum of Fine Arts, Houston (MFAH) by Emily Ballew Neff, Curator, American Painting and Sculpture, and it traveled to the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA).1 “Two Edges” was a virtual exhibition (never mounted) curated by artist Diana Thater for her participation, with LACMA Director Michael Govan, in the museum’s “Conversations with the Director” series, part of the suite of free public programming associated with the presentation of The Modern West at LACMA. Thater’s alternative “modern west” exhibition, created using “Virtual Gallerie” software and PowerPoint and presented digitally in a verbal “walk through,” was fully realized conceptually and functioned as a critique of Neff’s The Modern West, which she believed perpetuated and celebrated the mythology of the American West. Austen Barron Bailly, author of this paper, coordinated and installed The Modern West in Los Angeles and attended Thater’s presentation. As coordinating curator, I was responsible not only for deciding how to install the exhibition for LACMA but also for working with the museum’s Education Department to help develop all public programming for the exhibition—with one notable exception: Thater and Govan’s presentation. I was not involved, nor was I expected to be, in preparations for the I would like to thank Rita Gonzalez, Assistant Curator, LACMA, for encouraging me to write this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • A One Day Exhibition
    New Video at EAI: A One Day Exhibition New Video at EAI: A One Day Exhibition Saturday, September 8, 2001 12 - 6 pm, 535 West 22 Street, 5th floor New Video at EAI is presented in conjunction with the Downtown Arts Festival's Chelsea Art Walk day and with the cooperation of Dia Center for the Arts. Monitor 1 Joan Jonas Mirage 2, 2000, 30 min, b&w Mirage 2 is a reconsideration of the past, a new work edited by Jonas from footage recorded in the 1970s as part of her Mirage project. Eder Santos Projeto Apollo, 2000, 4 min, color Combining artfully designed sets and digital processing, Santos recreates the historic Apollo lunar landing, using simulation to interrogate representation. Ursula Hodel Cinderella 2001, 2001, 12 min, color Cinderella 2001 is a vibrant performance tape with an unnerving, compulsive narrative concerned with image and obsession. Phyllis Baldino 16 Minutes Lost, 2000, 16:54 min, color Baldino's 16 Minutes Lost is the perfect portrayal of scatterbrainedness, testament to the clutter of modern living and the inevitable failings of manmade systems. Monitor 2 Cheryl Donegan The Janice tapes: Lieder, 2000, 4 min, color; Whoa Whoa Studio (for Courbet), 2000, 4:30 min, color; Cellardoor, 2000, 2 min, silent In her new performance trilogy, Donegan sets up a series of charged relationships -- between artist and model, art object and artistic "gesture," performer and viewer. Mike Kelley Superman Recites Selections from 'The Bell Jar' and Other Works, 1999, 7:19 min, color, sound "In a dark no-place evocative of Superman?s own psychic ?Fortress of Solitude? the alienated Man of Steel recites those sections of Plath?s writings that utilize the image of the bell jar." Mike Kelley Kristin Lucas Involuntary Reception, 2000, 16:45 min, color Involuntary Reception is a double-imaged, double-edged report from a young woman lost in the telecommunications ether.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cross-Media Programme of Public Talks, Presentations, Curators & Critic's Choices, Performances and Installations
    ''U . c' . ' . adw~d! ar:uus4e, 44y-W-SWUOUIVIL 1'rEIKSWA, JU'CheVlcurator introduction into the p :gramme arsturrn 1 1 .15 THE DELIRIUM OF IMAGES public encounters with Marina Abramovic, Amsterdam Dr. Edith Decker, Video-Skulptur, Kalnischer Kunstverein/Jon Klein, NITV-Europe, London Bill Seaman, artist, Boston/The Vasulkas, artists, Santa Fe1Host : Herbert Wentscher PUBLIC CONVERSATION 2 . G7 RELATIVES performance by Constance DeJong (Nyack, NY) and Tony Oursler (Boston), video A cross-media programme 3.co CLOS of public talks, Wolfg$ng Preikschat, Amsterdam/Frankfurt LIGHTS FROM DATA SPACE curator, critic, and media, theorist an the electronic sign language of artificial intelligence presentations, curators" & t 1 .,1 .3 Wulf erzogenrath, Cologne FROM ANIMATED FILM TO VIDEO-ANIMATION a short history of a t chnical genre by the director of the Kalnischer Kunstverein and curator of the critic's choices, performances, Video Sculpture exhibition in Cologne 1 2 . 30 pm VIDEO~UNCH tapes by Peter Callas, Lyn Blumenthal/C :A. Klonarides, Joan Jonas, Dara and installations Blrnb um, a. a. Petr Vrana, tfassel vi DO I[ Video maker shows tapes and introduces into his ),Vidox-paint box atjimation technique and style 2.1 ',~ George Snow, London THE ARTIST AS ENGINEER British video director talks about his own a,joint project of experience with a new and innovative format and its range between art and design 2-1 r. Bill Seaman, Boston THE BOXER'S PUZZLE Video maker/composer presents his work and ECGTV-Studios Frankfurt speaks about his experience as artist at the Massachusetts Institut of Technology in Boston and ArcheV COFFEE BREAK accompanied by tapes of Alexander Hahn, Ka Nakajima, Volker Anding, a.
    [Show full text]
  • Tony Oursler CV
    Tony Oursler Lives and works in New York, NY, USA 1979 BFA, California Institute for the Arts, Valencia, CA, USA 1957 Born in New York, NY, USA Selected Solo Exhibitions 2021 ‘Tony Oursler: Black Box’, Kaohsiung Museum of Fine Arts, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan 2020 ‘Hypnose’, Musée d’arts de Nantes, Nantes, France Lisson Gallery, East Hampton, NY, USA 2019 ‘电流 (Current)’, Nanjing Eye Pedestrian Bridge, Nanjing, China ‘Tony Oursler: Water Memory’, Guild Hall, East Hampton, NY, USA ‘The Volcano & Poetics Tattoo’, Dep Art Gallery, Milan, Italy 2018 ‘predictive empath’, Baldwin Gallery, Aspen, CO, USA ‘Tear of the Cloud’, Public Art Fund, Riverside Park South, New York, NY, USA ‘TC: the most interesting man alive’, Lisson Gallery, New York, NY, USA 2017 ‘Paranormal: Tony Oursler vs. Gustavo Rol’, Pinacoteca Giovanni e Marella Agnelli, Turin, Italy ‘Sound Digressions: Spectrum’, Galerie Mitterand, Paris, France ‘Tony Oursler: b0t / flOw - ch@rt’, Galerie Forsblom, Stockholm, Sweden ‘Tony Oursler: L7-L5 / Imponderable’, CaixaForum, Barcelona, Spain ‘Unidentified’, Redling Fine Art, Los Angeles, CA, USA 2016 ‘Tony Oursler: The Influence Machine’, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom ‘A*gR_3’, Galería Moisés Pérez De Albéniz, Madrid ‘M*r>0r’, Magasin III Museum & Foundation for Contemporary Art, Stockholm, Sweden ‘Tony Oursler: The Imponderable Archive’ Hessel Museum of Art, Bard College, Annandale-On-Hudson, NY, USA ‘Imponderable’, Museum of Modern Art, New York, NY, USA ‘TC: The Most Interesting Man Alive’ Chrysler Museum, Norfolk,
    [Show full text]
  • National Endowment for the Arts Annual Report 1989
    National Endowment for the Arts Washington, D.C. Dear Mr. President: I have the honor to submit to you the Annual Report of the National Endowment for the Arts and the National Council on the Arts for the Fiscal Year ended September 30, 1989. Respectfully, John E. Frohnmayer Chairman The President The White House Washington, D.C. July 1990 Contents CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT ............................iv THE AGENCY AND ITS FUNCTIONS ..............xxvii THE NATIONAL COUNCIL ON THE ARTS .......xxviii PROGRAMS ............................................... 1 Dance ........................................................2 Design Arts ................................................20 . Expansion Arts .............................................30 . Folk Arts ....................................................48 Inter-Arts ...................................................58 Literature ...................................................74 Media Arts: Film/Radio/Television ......................86 .... Museum.................................................... 100 Music ......................................................124 Opera-Musical Theater .....................................160 Theater ..................................................... 172 Visual Arts .................................................186 OFFICE FOR PUBLIC PARTNERSHIP ...............203 . Arts in Education ..........................................204 Local Programs ............................................212 States Program .............................................216
    [Show full text]
  • Campus' Closed-Circuit Slavko Kacunko Slavko Kacunko
    Campus' Closed-Ci rcu it Campus' Closed-Circuit Slavko Kacunko Slavko Kacunko Lr) oo oo f_E Die Uberwindung der empha- rischen Praktiken zwischen dem ln order to arrive at an impartial As we all know, the writing ai his- ==OC) Closet l- l- tischen 0pposition zwischen dem hermeneutischen Kontextuber- view of media art that derives its tory like 'directness' * is a C)(J - schen 13Etl (I)(l) ,spezifisch Medialen' und dem druss und semiotischer Kontext- pertinence from the spheres of construct. A discourse abou; the <t) a gerat oo ,historisch Gewordenen' ist eine euphorie. both media theory and art history, 'directness' of media from an (J (J br/Pr Voraussetzung fiir den unbefange- Das Historieschreiben ist ebenso it is essential to overcome the art-historical perspective mev -(n -u) auditit nen Blick auf die Medienkunst, wie die,Unmittelbarkeit' bekannt- emphatic opposition between what illuminate the conflux of technical (f_== o_ lung, t (\,EE (g der seine Kompetenzen sowohl lich eine Konstruktion. Ein Diskurs is 'specific to media' and what and human viewpoints and rrreigh (JO ftir die Bereich Medien- 'has aus dem der [iber die mediale,Unmittelbarkeit' become historical'. up the opportunities and the bildet. theorie wie auch der Kunstge- aus kunsthistorischer Perspektive A future history of media art will dangers brought about by their sowol schichte beziehen will. Eine krlnfti- kann das Ndherbringen von have to counter 'post-historical' convergence, even their mul,.:al deren ge Medienkunstgeschichte wird technischen und menschlichen apocalyptic paranoia and fantasies penetration, schen der,posthistorischen' End zeitpar a- Sichtweisen durchleuchten und die of abolition with a thesis of conti- The attempts made during trie So ist noia und den Aufhebungsfantasien Chancen und Gefahren ihrer An- nuity which does not construct early period of 'video art'to differ- des e eine Kontinuititsthese entgegen niherung und lnterpenetration 'pre-established harmonies' in entiate it from other media r;f des b setzen mtlssen, welche nicht abwagen.
    [Show full text]
  • Before Projection: Video Sculpture 1974–1995 Contents
    Henriette Huldisch Before Projection: Video Sculpture 1974–1995 Contents 5 Director’s Foreword 9 Acknowledgments 13 Before and Besides Projection: Notes on Video Sculpture, 1974–1995 Henriette Huldisch Artist Entries Emily Watlington 57 Dara Birnbaum 81 Tony Oursler 61 Ernst Caramelle 85 Nam June Paik 65 Takahiko Iimura 89 Friederike Pezold 69 Shigeko Kubota 93 Adrian Piper 73 Mary Lucier 97 Diana Thater 77 Muntadas 101 Maria Vedder 121 Time Turned into Space: Some Aspects of Video Sculpture Edith Decker-Phillips 135 List of Works 138 Contributors 140 Lenders to the Exhibition 141 MIT List Visual Arts Center 5 Director’s Foreword It is not news that today screens occupy a vast amount of our time. Nor is it news that screens have not always been so pervasive. Some readers will remember a time when screens did not accompany our every move, while others were literally greeted with the flash of a digital cam- era at the moment they were born. Before Projection: Video Sculpture 1974–1995 showcases a generation of artists who engaged with monitors as sculptural objects before they were replaced by video projectors in the gallery and long before we carried them in our pockets. Curator Henriette Huldisch has brought together works by Dara Birnbaum, Ernst Caramelle, Takahiko Iimura, Shigeko Kubota, Mary Lucier, Muntadas, Tony Oursler, Nam June Paik, Friederike Pezold, Adrian Piper, Diana Thater, and Maria Vedder to consider the ways in which artists have used the monitor conceptually and aesthetically. Despite their innovative experimentation and per- sistent relevance, many of the sculptures in this exhibition have not been seen for some time—take, for example, Shigeko Kubota’s River (1979–81), which was part of the 1983 Whitney Biennial but has been in storage for decades.
    [Show full text]