DOCSLIB.ORG

Parks & Recreation Services Municipal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parks & Recreation Services Municipal Public Review Draft Report Parks & Recreation Services Municipal Service Review and Sphere of Influence Updates Prepared for: Contra Costa Local Agency Formation Commission Prepared by: Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) In association with: Berkson Associates (BA) March 2021 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 Legal Context & LAFCO Policies ................................................................................. 1 Overview of Jurisdictions .......................................................................................... 2 MSR Methodology ................................................................................................... 4 Best Practices ......................................................................................................... 8 Impact of the COVID-19 Global Pandemic ................................................................... 9 Organization of the MSR .......................................................................................... 9 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................... 10 2. MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW AND SOI SUMMARY .......................................................... 11 Municipal Service Review Determinations ................................................................. 11 Sphere of Influence Recommendations ..................................................................... 16 3. AMBROSE RECREATION & PARK DISTRICT ................................................................... 22 Agency Boundaries ................................................................................................ 22 Impact of COVID-19 .............................................................................................. 24 Growth and Population Projections .......................................................................... 24 Adequacy of Park and Recreation Facilities and Services ............................................. 25 Financial Ability to Provide Services ......................................................................... 28 Management & Accountability ................................................................................. 29 Ambrose Recreation and Park District MSR Determinations ......................................... 31 Sphere of Influence Update .................................................................................... 33 4. GREEN VALLEY RECREATION & PARK DISTRICT ............................................................. 35 Agency Boundaries ................................................................................................ 35 Impact of COVID-19 .............................................................................................. 37 Growth and Population Projections .......................................................................... 37 Adequacy of Park and Recreation Facilities and Services ............................................. 38 Financial Ability to Provide Services ......................................................................... 41 Management & Accountability ................................................................................. 42 Green Valley Recreation and Park District MSR Determinations .................................... 43 Sphere of Influence Update .................................................................................... 45 5. PLEASANT HILL RECREATION & PARK DISTRICT ............................................................ 47 Agency Boundaries ................................................................................................ 47 Impact of COVID-19 .............................................................................................. 47 Growth and Population Projections .......................................................................... 49 Adequacy of Park and Recreation Facilities and Services ............................................. 50 Financial Ability to Provide Services ......................................................................... 54 Management & Accountability ................................................................................. 56 MSR Determinations .............................................................................................. 57 Sphere of Influence Update .................................................................................... 59 6. EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT ........................................................................ 62 Agency Boundaries ................................................................................................ 62 Impact of COVID-19 .............................................................................................. 64 Growth and Population Projections .......................................................................... 64 Adequacy of Park and Recreation Facilities and Services ............................................. 65 Financial Ability to Provide Services ......................................................................... 68 Management & Accountability ................................................................................. 71 MSR Determinations .............................................................................................. 72 7. CITY PARKS & RECREATION & SERVICES .................................................................... 74 Overview of Agencies ............................................................................................ 74 Growth and Population Projections .......................................................................... 74 Disadvantaged Communities ................................................................................... 75 Adequacy of Park and Recreation Facilities and Services ............................................. 76 Financial Ability to Provide Services ......................................................................... 78 Shared Facilities and Cooperation ............................................................................ 81 Accountability for Community Service Needs ............................................................. 81 Impact of COVID-19 .............................................................................................. 81 City Recreation Services MSR Determinations ........................................................... 82 City of Antioch .............................................................................................. 82 City of Brentwood .......................................................................................... 84 City of Clayton .............................................................................................. 86 City of Concord ............................................................................................. 88 Town of Danville ........................................................................................... 90 City of El Cerrito ........................................................................................... 92 City of Hercules ............................................................................................ 95 City of Lafayette ........................................................................................... 97 City of Martinez ............................................................................................. 99 City of Moraga ............................................................................................. 101 City of Oakley .............................................................................................. 103 City of Orinda .............................................................................................. 105 City of Pinole ............................................................................................... 107 City of Pittsburg ........................................................................................... 109 City of Richmond .......................................................................................... 111 City of San Pablo .......................................................................................... 113 City of San Ramon ....................................................................................... 115 City of Walnut Creek ..................................................................................... 117 8. COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICTS ........................................................................... 120 Overview of Districts ............................................................................................ 120 Impact of COVID-19 ............................................................................................. 121 Growth and Population Projections ......................................................................... 121 Present and Planned Capacity of Facilities and Adequacy of Public Services .................. 123 Financial Ability to Provide Services ........................................................................ 128 Management & Accountability ................................................................................ 129 Crockett Community Services District MSR Determinations ........................................ 133 Diablo Community Services District MSR Determinations ..........................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Birdathon 2010 Bay Area Burrowing Owls Face Many Challenges
    vol. 95 no. 4 May 2010 the newsletter of the golden gate audubon society founded 1917 Join the Fun! Birdathon 2010 here is still time to sign up for Birdathon T 2010 if you don’t delay. You can enjoy exhilarating bird sightings in your backyard, along our shorelines, or farther afi eld—and help Golden Gate Audubon support our important conservation and education programs. The spirit of friendly competition is in the air—along with the many bird species migrating through the Bay Area this time of the year. Sign up today to join this fun event, which is suitable for the entire family and community. Mary Malec With just two weeks left before the May 16 Western Burrowing Owl eating a caterpillar, at Cesar Chavez Park, Berkeley. completion date, you and your friends and fam- ily can get involved in the Birdathon by signing up online, over the phone, or in person at our Bay Area Burrowing Owls Berkeley offi ce. To register online, go to www. goldengateaudubon.org/birdathon. Face Many Challenges A birdathon is like a walkathon, except par- ticipants count bird species instead of miles. Friends, family members, and coworkers support espite the hopes and best efforts of dedicated Golden Gate Audubon vol- you by pledging any amount for each species you D unteers, the number of migrating Western Burrowing Owls that spend identify. Participation in the event automatically winter months in Berkeley’s Cesar Chavez Park continue to decline. Ten years ago, enters you into contests for a chance to win 15 Burrowing Owls were seen in the park.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Plan Bay Area 2050 Air Quality Conformity Analysis
    DRAFT AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY AND CONSISTENCY REPORT JULY 2021 PBA2050 COMMISH BOARD DRAFT 06.14.21 Metropolitan Transportation Association of City Representatives Commission Bay Area Governments Susan Adams Alfredo Pedroza, Chair Jesse Arreguín, President Councilmember, City of Rohnert Park Napa County and Cities Mayor, City of Berkeley Nikki Fortunato Bas Nick Josefowitz, Vice Chair Belia Ramos, Vice President Councilmember, City of Oakland San Francisco Mayor's Appointee Supervisor, County of Napa London Breed Margaret Abe-Koga David Rabbitt, Mayor, City and County of San Francisco Cities of Santa Clara County Immediate Past President Tom Butt Supervisor, County of Sonoma Eddie H. Ahn Mayor, City of Richmond San Francisco Bay Conservation Pat Eklund and Development Commission County Representatives Mayor, City of Novato David Canepa Candace Andersen Maya Esparza San Mateo County Supervisor, County of Contra Costa Councilmember, City of San José Cindy Chavez David Canepa Carroll Fife Santa Clara County Supervisor, County of San Mateo Councilmember, City of Oakland Damon Connolly Keith Carson Neysa Fligor Marin County and Cities Supervisor, County of Alameda Mayor, City of Los Altos Carol Dutra-Vernaci Cindy Chavez Leon Garcia Cities of Alameda County Supervisor, County of Santa Clara Mayor, City of American Canyon Dina El-Tawansy Otto Lee Liz Gibbons California State Transportation Agency Supervisor, County of Santa Clara Mayor, City of Campbell (CalSTA) Gordon Mar Giselle Hale Victoria Fleming Supervisor, City and County Vice Mayor, City of Redwood City Sonoma County and Cities of San Francisco Barbara Halliday Dorene M. Giacopini Rafael Mandelman Mayor, City of Hayward U.S. Department of Transportation Supervisor, City and County Rich Hillis Federal D.
    [Show full text]
  • Garin/Dry Creek Pioneer Regional Parks Staging Area
    80 Suisun Honker er Carquinez S Riv Bay acra nto San Strait Bay Browns me Pablo 160 er San Crockett C Bay Island iv ar Martinez R Bay qu Bay in Pablo in Point u Hills e aq z Shoreline Point Jo Sc n Bay en Sa Pinole ic A D l Waterbird Pittsburg h Pittsburg r 4 a 4 m P i Antioch b Pablo Ave n Antioch r n o Hercules Antioch/Oakley a a Point At l S e Martinez las Rd A 680 d V v R Shoreline Big Pinole d a e le n ll il mo e v ich y y Rancho 242 d s Break R R Sobrante R r Contra Pkw El d ss e Oakley a m t P Rd y Pinole w o A llo s L Sobrante Ridge lham i as S Loma o San br W Concord P ne Gian a r Hw Rd Va ke T 80 nch lley d R Cl ir re Pablo Ra R e a K e ro l yton Rd Knightsen st ie Way Ca z d Kennedy V a n Rd lv ll B e Richmond Grove y yo Brentwood Wildcat Pleasant Briones R v d d v d Hill R Canyon 580 Clayton Black Diamond y Orwood Rd e S l Garrar a l Cutting Blvd n a V d Mines Delta P R r Miller/ Tilden y Mitchell Can M a d le l a e b R Va rs o e l B ek ci h o El ear Cre a C Access n r D Knox A g ee H Y k v Cerrito Castle Rd Point e W a p py V Clayton d ild all y G e lv ca y N r R Rock B Isabel i t o B z d Walnut Ranch Hw C r l z a t t l n Deer n v y h u d yo Brooks P n Creek M G Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Budget & Finance Agenda
    BOARD OF DIRECTORS MOBILE SOURCE COMMITTEE COMMITTEE MEMBERS TIM SMITH - CHAIR JAKE McGOLDRICK – VICE CHAIR TOM BATES SCOTT HAGGERTY YORIKO KISHIMOTO CAROL KLATT MARK ROSS JOHN SILVA GAYLE B. UILKEMA WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 19, 2008 4TH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM Immediately following Board Meeting DISTRICT OFFICES AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL 2. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD (Public Comment on Non-Agenda Items Pursuant to Government Code § 54954.3) Members of the public are afforded the opportunity to speak on any agenda item. All agendas for regular meetings are posted at District headquarters, 939 Ellis Street, San Francisco, CA, at least 72 hours in advance of a regular meeting. At the beginning of the regular meeting agenda, an opportunity is also provided for the public to speak on any subject within the Committee’s subject matter jurisdiction. Speakers will be limited to three (3) minutes each. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF OCTOBER 23, 2008 4. CONSIDERATION OF CONTRACTOR SELECTION FOR THE VEHICLE BUY-BACK PROGRAM J. Colbourn/5192 [email protected] The Committee will consider recommending Board of Directors’ approval of one or more contractors to provide dismantling services for the Vehicle Buy Back Program. 5. CONSIDERATION OF $41,498,594 IN CALIFORNIA GOODS MOVEMENT BOND FUNDING PROJECTS J. Broadbent/5052 [email protected] The Committee will consider recommending Board of Directors’ approval of staff recommendations for $41,498,594 in funding for eligible projects under the California Goods Movement Bond Program and authorize the Executive Officer/APCO to enter into all necessary contracts to expend the requested funds. 6. AUDIT OF THE TRANSPORTATION FUND FOR CLEAN AIR (TFCA) REGIONAL FUND J.
    [Show full text]
  • Trails Workshop
    Trails Workshop © Photo by Jerry Ting October 29, 2019 THIS PAGE IS LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 2 AGENDA Board Workshop: Sustainable Trails for All in New Parklands October 29, 2019 12:00 p.m. Introduction and Opening Comments Ayn Wieskamp, President, Board of Directors Robert E. Doyle, General Manager 12:10 p.m. Overview Kristina Kelchner, AGM, Acquisition, Stewardship & Development 12:20 p.m. Sustainable Trail Design and Planning Sean Dougan, Trails Development Program Manager Brian Holt, Chief of Planning and GIS 1:10 p.m. Public Comment 1:25 p.m. Break 1:45 p.m. Facilitated Board Discussion Lou Hexter (Moore, Iacofano, & Goltsman, Inc.) 3:00 p.m. Additional Public Comment/Response 3:45 p.m. Closing Comments 4:00 p.m. Adjournment 3 THIS PAGE IS LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. MEMORANDUM TO THE BOARD ................................................................ 7 2. GLOSSARY OF TRAIL TERMINOLOGY .................................................... 15 3. CA STATE PARK TRAIL DESIGN STANDARDS SUMMARY ................. 22 4. MAP ................................................................................................................... 28 5 THIS PAGE IS LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 6 EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT MEMORANDUM October 29, 2019 To: Board of Directors From: Robert E. Doyle, General Manager Dr. Ana M. Alvarez, Deputy General Manager Kristina Kelchner, Assistant General Manager, ASD Division Subject: Board Workshop on Sustainable Trails for All in Recently Acquired Parklands The Acquisition, Stewardship, and Development (ASD) Division appreciates the Board of Directors’ request for this workshop on trails. As one of the primary ways that people engage with the parks, trails are critical to the Park District’s mission of connecting people to nature. The workshop discussion will focus on the Park District’s Master Plan policy of providing “trails for all” through development of new sustainable, natural surface, multi-use trails in recently acquired parklands.
    [Show full text]
  • El Cerrito Agenda
    THE CITY OF EL CERRITO AGENDA SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, March 6, 2012-6:40 p.m. Hillside Conference Room REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, March 6, 2012-7:00 p.m. City Council Chambers SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING- CLOSED SESSION Tuesday, March 6, 2012- Immediately Following the Municipal Services Corporation Meeting Hillside Conference Room Meeting Location El Cerrito City Hall 10890 San Pablo A venue, El Cerrito Bill Jones - Mayor Mayor Pro Tern Greg Lyman Councilmember Ann Cheng Councilmember Rebecca Benassini Councilmember Janet Abelson 6:40p.m. ROLLCALL CONVENE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC Comments are limited to 3 minutes per person and to this special agenda only. COMMISSION INTERVIEWS, STATUS AND APPOINTMENTS Conduct interviews of candidates for city boards and commissions. Interviews may result in an announcement of appointment at the meeting. The City Council may also discuss scheduling of future interviews. ADJOURN SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING ROLLCALL 7:00p.m. CONVENE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING Page 2 of 4 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG - led by Mayor Pro Tern Lyman. 2. COUNCIL I STAFF COMMUNICATIONS (Reports ofClosed Session, commission appointments and informational reports on matters ofgeneral interest which are announced by the City Council & City Staff) 3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC All persons wishing to speak should sign up with the City Clerk. Remarks are limited to 3 minutes per person. Please state your name and city of residence for the record. Comments regarding non-agenda, presentation and consent calendar items will be heardfirst. Comments related to items appearing on the Public Hearing or Policy Matter portions ofthe Agenda are taken up at the time the City Council deliberates each action item.
    [Show full text]
  • Parks & Recreation Services Municipal Service Review And
    Draft Final Report Parks & Recreation Services Municipal Service Review and Sphere of Influence Updates Prepared for: Contra Costa Local Agency Formation Commission Prepared by: Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) In association with: Berkson Associates (BA) June 2021 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 Legal Context & LAFCO Policies ................................................................................. 1 Overview of Jurisdictions .......................................................................................... 2 MSR Methodology ................................................................................................... 4 Best Practices ......................................................................................................... 8 Impact of the COVID-19 Global Pandemic ................................................................... 9 Organization of the MSR .......................................................................................... 9 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................... 10 2. MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW AND SOI SUMMARY .......................................................... 11 Municipal Service Review Determinations ................................................................. 11 Sphere of Influence Recommendations ..................................................................... 16 3. AMBROSE
    [Show full text]
  • Green Infrastructure Plan County of Alameda Unincorporated Area
    Green Infrastructure Plan County of Alameda Unincorporated Area August 7, 2019 Acknowledgments The County of Alameda gratefully acknowledges the following individuals and organizations that contributed to this Green Infrastructure (GI) Plan: Laura Pricket of Horizon Water and Environment for developing the framework for this GI Plan Kristin Kerr of EOA, Inc. for coordinating the development of this GI Plan for the County of Alameda Liesbeth Magna and Peter Schultze-Allen of EOA for assisting with development of this GI Plan All of the staff from the County of Alameda’s Public Works, General Services, and Community Development Agencies that have assisted with the development of this GI Plan. The County would like to thank and acknowledge the City of Palo Alto and City of San Jose for sharing text from their Green Stormwater Infrastructure Plans. Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Statement of Purpose ........................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 MRP Requirements .............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.3 Unincorporated County..................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 What is Green Infrastructure .............................................................................................. 1-5
    [Show full text]
  • EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT Vision and Mission Statements
    EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT Vision and Mission Statements Vision The East Bay Regional Park District will preserve a priceless heritage of natural and cultural resources, open space, parks and trails for the future and will set aside park areas for the enjoyment and healthful recreation for generations to come. An environmental ethic guides us in all that we do. Mission The East Bay Regional Park District will achieve the above vision in the following ways: • Provide a diversified system of regional parklands, trails, and parkland-related services that will offer outstanding opportunities for creative use of outdoor time. • Acquire and preserve significant biologic, geologic, scenic, and historic resources within Alameda and Contra Costa Counties. • Manage, maintain and restore the parklands so that they retain their important scenic, natural, and cultural values. • Interpret the parklands by focusing educational programs on both the visitor’s relationship to nature, natural processes, ecology, history of the parklands, and the value of natural conditions. • Support the development and retention of well-trained, dedicated, and productive employees. • Improve access to and use of the parks by members of groups that have been underrepresented, such as disabled, economically disadvantaged, and elderly visitors. • Balance environmental concerns and outdoor recreational opportunities within regional parklands. • Provide recreational development that fosters appropriate use of parklands while preserving their remoteness and intrinsic value. • Create quality programs that recognize the cultural diversity represented in the region. • Participate in partnerships with public agencies, nonprofit organizations, volunteers, and the private sector to achieve mutual goals. • Provide leadership to help guide land use decisions of East Bay governments that relate to the District.
    [Show full text]
  • El Cerrito Historical Trail
    EL CERRITO HISTORICAL TRAIL Cub Scout Pack 104 El Cerrito, California www.elcerritoscouting.org Hike Information Total Trail Length: 8.0 Miles Western Segment - Del Norte Station to EC Plaza Station: 3.8 Miles Eastern Segment - EC Plaza Station to Del Norte Station: 4.2 Miles Hike Instructions The following pages include step-by-step hiking directions, denoted by underlined text. Major points of interest are highlighted in BOLD CAPITAL LETTERS. Informational text is presented in the indented sections. There are Numbered Questions for you to answer along the way. You may write in answers next to the questions or use the optional answer sheet at the back of the booklet. Cub Scouts are encouraged to hike as much of the trail as they can, but they are not required to complete the whole 8 miles. Do your best! Older Scouts are expected to complete the entire trail in order to earn the patch. The hike is designed as a loop, starting and ending at the Del Norte BART Station, but you may jump in anywhere along the route. The trail may be hiked over multiple days; there is no time limit. If you have difficulty finding a point of interest or the answer to a question, it’s ok to skip it and move on to the next one. What you’re looking for may no longer be there. A Brief History of El Cerrito The area around present-day El Cerrito was once home to the Ohlone Indians. The first Spanish explorers, led by Pedro Fages, arrived in 1772 and set up camp alongside the “cerrito” known today as Albany Hill.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohlone Greenway Master Plan — El Cerrito, California 4
    O HL O NE GREENWAY MASTER PLAN EL CERRITO, CALIFORNIA ADOPTED JUNE 15, 2009 GATES +ASSOCIATES A CKNOWLEDGEMENTS E L CERRIT O CITY CO UN C IL E L CERRIT O PARKS AND RE C REATI O N Comm ISSI O N C ITY O F EL CERRIT O PUBLI C WO RKS DE P ART M ENT STAFF Thank you to all the Residents of El Cerrito, Ohlone Greenway users, and Boards and Commissions of El Cerrito for your valuable input during the planning process Prepared by David Gates and Associates, San Ramon CA TABLE OF CONTENTS O HLONE GREENW A Y MA STER PL A N A. I NTR O DU C TI O N 5 E. P UBLI C Imp R ov E M ENTS 45 Project Overview 6 Area 1 - City Limit to Central Avenue 46 Purpose and Process 7 Area 2 - Central Avenue to Stockton Avenue 48 Historical Reference 8 Area 3 - Stockton Avenue to Portola Avenue 50 Background 9 Area 4 - Portola Avenue to Manila Avenue 53 Area 5 - Manila Avenue to Blake Street 56 B. S ITE ANALYSIS 11 Area 6 - Blake Street to Knott Avenue 60 Existing Conditions 13 Area 7 - Knott Avenue to Conlon Avenue 62 Opportunities and Constraints 15 F. I mp LE M ENTATI O N 65 C. M ASTER PLAN DESI G N VISION 17 Implementation Approach 66 Vision and Goals 18 Phasing 67 Character and Image 19 Opinion of Probable Costs 68 D. D ESI G N GUIDELINES 21 G. A pp ENDIX 71 Guidelines Overview 22 Supporting Materials - Tanaka Plan 72 Trail Alignment 23 Supporting Materials - Meetings 74 Security 26 Supporting Materials - Creek Memo 80 Safety and Access 27 Supporting Materials - General Plan 82 Maintenance 28 Supporting Materials - Bibliography 83 Signage and Infrastructure 29 Planting
    [Show full text]
  • Summit Reservoir Replacement Draft Environmental Impact Report
    Summit Reservoir Replacement Draft Environmental Impact Report State Clearinghouse #2010072060 East Bay Municipal Utility District May 2011 May 20, 2011 NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY Summit Reservoir Replacement Project Berkeley, Alameda County and Kensington, Contra Costa County Draft Environmental Impact Report SCH #2010072060 Notice is hereby given that a Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is available for public review. The project proponent is the East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD, 375 Eleventh Street, Oakland, California 94607-4240). EBMUD is also the Lead Agency, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Project Description: Facility improvements to the Summit Reservoir and the Woods and Shasta Pumping Plants located at 416 Spruce Street in the City of Berkeley are proposed to address regulatory concerns related to hazardous materials in the reservoir liner caulking (1994 Alameda County District Attorney Agreement), to replace inefficient storage and improve water quality by downsizing with optimal storage from projected future demand and cost perspectives, and to restore operational flexibility and reliability in the greater Summit Pressure Zone. The project involves demolition of the existing 37-million gallon (MG) open-cut reservoir and appurtenances (including the roof system, roof features, and concrete lining) as well as decommissioning of the Woods and Shasta Pumping Plants located below the southwestern reservoir embankment. Construction includes a new 3.5-MG, partially buried concrete tank, replacement pumping plants (including pumps and motors, instrumentation, motor control centers, transformers and related appurtenances) in a new structure west of the new Summit tank location, a new Summit flow control valve within the pumping plant structure to access 1.5-MG storage from existing Woods Reservoir located approximately one mile to the east, and a replacement inlet/outlet pipeline from the new Summit tank.
    [Show full text]