Annual Report for 2005–06

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annual Report for 2005–06 House of Commons Liaison Committee Annual Report for 2005–06 First Report of Session 2006–07 Report, together with appendices and formal minutes Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 15 March 2007 HC 406 Published on 17 April 2007 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Liaison Committee The Liaison Committee is appointed to consider general matters relating to the work of select committees; to advise the House of Commons Commission on select committees; to choose select committee reports for debate in the House and to hear evidence from the Prime Minister on matters of public policy. Current membership Mr Alan Williams MP (Labour, Swansea West) (Chairman) The Chairmen for the time being of the Select Committees listed below: Administration – Mr Frank Doran MP (Labour, Aberdeen North) Communities and Local Government – Dr Phyllis Starkey MP (Labour, Milton Keynes South West) Constitutional Affairs – Mr Alan Beith MP (Liberal Democrat, Berwick-upon- Tweed) Culture, Media and Sport – Mr John Whittingdale MP (Conservative, Maldon and Chelmsford East) Defence – Mr James Arbuthnot MP (Conservative, North East Hampshire) Education and Skills – Mr Barry Sheerman MP (Labour/Co-op, Huddersfield) Environmental Audit – Mr Tim Yeo MP (Conservative, South Suffolk) Environment, Food and Rural Affairs – Mr Michael Jack MP (Conservative, Fylde) European Scrutiny – Michael Connarty MP (Labour, Linlithgow and East Falkirk) Finance and Services – Sir Stuart Bell MP (Labour, Middlesbrough) Foreign Affairs – Mike Gapes MP (Labour/Co-op, Ilford South) Health – Mr Kevin Barron MP (Labour, Rother Valley) Home Affairs – Mr John Denham MP (Labour, Southampton Itchen) Human Rights (Joint Committee) – Mr Andrew Dismore MP (Labour, Hendon) International Development – Rt Hon Malcolm Bruce MP (Liberal Democrat, Gordon) Northern Ireland Affairs – Sir Patrick Cormack MP (Conservative, South Staffordshire) Procedure – Mr Greg Knight MP (Conservative, Yorkshire East) Public Accounts – Mr Edward Leigh MP (Conservative, Gainsborough) Public Administration – Dr Tony Wright MP (Labour, Cannock Chase) Regulatory Reform – Andrew Miller MP (Labour, Ellesmere Port and Neston) Science and Technology – Mr Phil Willis MP (Liberal Democrat, Harrogate and Knaresborough) Scottish Affairs – Mr Mohammad Sarwar MP (Labour, Glasgow Central) Selection – Rosemary McKenna MP (Labour, Cumbernauld, Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch East) Standards and Privileges – Sir George Young MP (Conservative, North West Hampshire) Statutory Instruments – David Maclean MP (Conservative, Penrith and The Border) Trade and Industry – Peter Luff MP (Conservative, Mid Worcestershire) Transport – Mrs Gwyneth Dunwoody MP (Labour, Crewe and Nantwich) Treasury – Mr John McFall MP (Labour/Co-op, West Dunbartonshire) Welsh Affairs – Dr Hywel Francis MP (Labour, Aberavon) Work and Pensions – Mr Terry Rooney MP (Labour, Bradford North) Powers The powers of the Committee are set out in House of Commons SO No 145. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/liaison_committee.cfm. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Helen Irwin (Clerk), Robert Wilson (Second Clerk), Kevin Candy (Committee Assistant) and Catherine Close (Secretary). For this Report they were assisted by Eliot Wilson, David Weir, and Matthew Hamlyn and Anwen Rees from the Scrutiny Unit. Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Liaison Committee, House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 5675; the Committee’s email address is [email protected] 1 Contents Report Page Summary 3 1 Introduction 5 2 Review of committees’ work 6 Core tasks 6 Task 1: Scrutiny of policy proposals 7 Task 2: Identification and examination of areas of emerging or deficient policy 10 Task 3: Scrutiny of draft bills 12 Task 4: Examination of departmental decisions, circulars, guidance etc 16 Task 5: Scrutiny of expenditure plans and outturns 17 Task 6: Scrutinising Public Service Agreements and targets 22 Task 7: Monitoring the work of agencies and other public bodies 24 Task 8: Scrutiny of major appointments 27 Task 9: Implementation of legislation 28 Task 10: Debates in Westminster Hall and the Chamber 29 3 Working practices 33 Working with others 33 Relations with the devolved assemblies 33 Relations with the Judiciary 34 Cooperation between committees 35 Cooperation at the EU level 37 Information gathering 38 Engaging with the public and the media 40 Working with government departments 43 4 New developments 48 Post-legislative scrutiny 48 5 Activity and resources 50 Select committee activity 50 Costs of select committees 52 Resources for select committees 53 Conclusions and recommendations 55 Appendix 1: List of Annual Reports of Select Committees for 2005–06 58 Appendix 2: Letter from the Chairman of the Environmental Audit Committee 60 Appendix 3: Letter from the Chairman of the Joint Committee on Human Rights 66 2 Appendix 4: Memorandum on the work of the Scrutiny Unit 73 Appendix 5: National Audit Office Support for House of Commons Select Committees in 2006: note by the NAO 80 3 Summary Accountability of Government now depends vitally on select committees, whose work since the General Election of 2005 is reviewed in this report. Hopefully, select committees are doing what the public would like to do. They are posing challenging questions to ministers and civil servants. Without them, there would be no meaningful parliamentary scrutiny. In open evidence sessions, often in front of the cameras, ministers—in our case the Prime Minister—and officials have to explain and justify their policies. Committees analyse issues and offer conclusions based on evidence. Their reports regularly set the daily political agenda. In this way the full range of Government activity is under Parliament’s scrutiny. Eighteen select committees monitor the main government departments, and others specialise in subjects covering more than one ministerial responsibility. Half the House of Commons takes part in this work, working together in committees of up to 14 Members. Nearly thirty years since its creation in 1979, the modern system of select committees is coming of age. This report begins by reviewing the different sorts of investigative committee work which now make up the central scrutiny agenda. It then discusses the ways in which committees have been developing their working methods, most notably to connect more directly with the public through webfora or via the media. Financial scrutiny is getting greater emphasis and more resources. Post-legislative scrutiny may be another area for examination, if the right mechanism can be found. Overall, the annual scrutiny output remains impressive— currently up to 150 reports, more than 500 evidence sessions. Thanks to select committees, Parliament is now more active in watching and challenging what Government is doing. 5 1 Introduction 1. This is our first review of committee work following the General Election of May 2005, and we cover the period to early 2007. As usual, there was some delay before select committees were nominated, but all were established in time to meet and initiate programmes of work before the summer recess. Since then committees have been active across a wide range of policy areas, discharging their duties in a variety of different, and often innovative, ways. Their work regularly dominates political news. It ranges from high profile evidence sessions—such as those which unearthed the failure of the Home Office to deport foreign nationals released from prison,1 or extracted an admission from the Home Secretary that the immigration system was “not fit for purpose”2—to reports which set the daily agenda for public discussion—on identity cards, drug classification, party funding, carbon emissions, parking policy and enforcement or smoking in public places, to give some recent examples. 2. Scrutiny is carried out by the individual select committees which our Members chair— the 18 committees which correspond to government departments, and others such as Environmental Audit, Human Rights,3 Public Accounts, Public Administration, or Regulatory Reform whose work cuts across all ministerial responsibilities. 3. For proper accountability of Government, committees need full cooperation from ministers and officials, access to information and witnesses, resources to assess the material, and public awareness of their work, currently achieved mainly through the media. Our brief as the Liaison Committee is to make sure that these are available. Particular issues are discussed in later sections of our report, or in the reports on their work produced by individual select committees, on which we have drawn for this text. 4. The Liaison Committee carries out its own scrutiny by means of twice-yearly evidence sessions with the Prime Minister, most recently on 6 February 2007.4 We have also continued our dialogue with the Leader of the House over issues such as committees’ access to information from departments, post-legislative scrutiny of Acts of Parliament and the role of committees in examining draft bills. We are grateful to the current Leader, Rt Hon Jack Straw, and his predecessors for their willingness to cooperate with our work,
Recommended publications
  • The Work of Committees in 2007
    House of Commons Liaison Committee The work of committees in 2007 Third Report of Session 2007–08 HC 427 House of Commons Liaison Committee The work of committees in 2007 Third Report of Session 2007–08 Report, together with appendices and formal minutes Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 27 March 2008 HC 427 Published on 4 April 2008 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Liaison Committee The Liaison Committee is appointed to consider general matters relating to the work of select committees; to advise the House of Commons Commission on select committees; to choose select committee reports for debate in the House and to hear evidence from the Prime Minister on matters of public policy. Current membership Mr Alan Williams MP (Labour, Swansea West) (Chairman) The Chairmen for the time being of the Select Committees listed below: Administration – Mr Frank Doran MP (Labour, Aberdeen North) Business and Enterprise – Peter Luff MP (Conservative, Mid Worcestershire) Children, Schools and Families – Mr Barry Sheerman MP (Labour/Co-op, Huddersfield) Communities and Local Government – Dr Phyllis Starkey MP (Labour, Milton Keynes South West) Culture, Media and Sport – Mr John Whittingdale MP (Conservative, Maldon and Chelmsford East) Defence – Mr James Arbuthnot MP (Conservative, North East Hampshire) Environmental Audit – Mr Tim Yeo MP (Conservative, South Suffolk) Environment, Food and Rural Affairs – Mr Michael Jack MP (Conservative, Fylde) European Scrutiny – Michael Connarty MP (Labour,
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF on Watching the Watchmen
    REPORT Watching the Watchmen The Growing Case for Recall Elections and Increased Accountability for MPs Sam Goodman About the Author Sam Goodman is the author of the Imperial Premiership: The Role of the Modern Prime Minister in Foreign Policy Making, 1964-2015 (Manchester University Press: 2015). He is currently working as a political adviser to Peter Dowd MP the current Shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury and has previously worked for a variety of Labour Members of Parliament including: Julie Cooper MP, Sir Mark Hendrick MP, Michael Dugher MP, and Rt. Hon Jack Straw MP. Watching the Watchmen: The Growing Case for Recall Elections and Increased Accountability for MPs Members of the House of Commons have long flirted parliamentary conventions and much procedure with the idea of British exceptionalism—citing the is arcane, which makes it difficult even for the UK’s role as the ‘mother of all parliaments’, its most ardent politically engaged citizen to follow unwritten constitution, its unitary voting system, proceedings and debates in the House of Commons. and the principle of the sovereignty of Parliament This separation between the governors and over the people—as a bulwark against the instability governed is exacerbated further by the limited customarily found in other western democracies. avenues available to the public to hold those elected In modern times, this argument held water as to account, which is exemplified by recent political it delivered stable parliamentary majorities, scandals, including allegations of bullying and peaceful transfers of power between governments, sexual harassment in the House of Commons. At the and kept in check the ideological fringes of both time of writing this report, no MP has been forced major political parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Monetary Policy Oversight in Comparative Perspective: Britain and America During the Financial Crisis
    Political Science and Political Economy Working Paper Department of Government London School of Economics No. 3/2014 Monetary Policy Oversight in Comparative Perspective: Britain and America during the Financial Crisis Cheryl Schonhardt-Bailey (LSE) Monetary Policy Oversight in Comparative Perspective: Britain and America During the Financial Crisis Cheryl Schonhardt-Bailey Government Department London School of Economics and Political Science Houghton Street London WC2A 2AE [email protected] http://personal.lse.ac.uk/schonhar/ This study examines deliberation on monetary policy oversight in the US and UK between 2006 and 2009. It employs reciprocity as the key criterion for judging the quality of monetary policy oversight deliberation (i.e., committee participants are expected to engage with one another, taking up and responding to the reasons offered by other participants). Using automated content analysis, the empirical finding is that reciprocity is clearly evident in the parliamentary oversight committee, but much less so in the two congressional committees. The two country cases represent very different approaches to legislative oversight, with the UK demonstrating a committee approach both in terms of the testimony of the monetary policy body and of the behaviour of the legislative committee, while the US demonstrates a focus on a series of individual contributions both from the Fed chairman and Members of Congress. In the US, this appears to allow greater scope to divert discussion away from the primary focus of hearings (i.e., monetary policy). 1 I. Introduction In normal economic times, clashes between politicians and central bankers in legislative oversight hearings on monetary policy are not typically considered worthy of headline news coverage.
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday 8 February 2017 COMMITTEE of the WHOLE HOUSE PROCEEDINGS
    1 SUPPLEMENT TO THE VOTES AND PROCEEDINGS Wednesday 8 February 2017 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE HOUSE PROCEEDINGS EUROPEAN UNION (NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL) BILL [THIRD DAY] GLOSSARY This document shows the fate of each clause, schedule, amendment and new clause. The following terms are used: Agreed to: agreed without a vote. Agreed to on division: agreed following a vote. Negatived: rejected without a vote. Negatived on division: rejected following a vote. Not called: debated in a group of amendments, but not put to a decision. Not moved: not debated or put to a decision. Question proposed: debate underway but not concluded. Withdrawn after debate: moved and debated but then withdrawn, so not put to a decision. Not selected: not chosen for debate by the Chair. NEW CLAUSES AND NEW SCHEDULES RELATING TO THE PRIORITIES IN NEGOTIATIONS FOR THE UNITED KINGDOM’S WITHDRAWAL FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION; CLAUSES 1 AND 2; REMAINING NEW CLAUSES; REMAINING NEW SCHEDULES; REMAINING PROCEEDINGS IN COMMITTEE NEW CLAUSES AND NEW SCHEDULES RELATING TO THE PRIORITIES IN NEGOTIATIONS FOR THE UNITED KINGDOM’S WITHDRAWAL FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION Jeremy Corbyn Mr Nicholas Brown Keir Starmer Paul Blomfield Jenny Chapman 2 Committee of the whole House Proceedings: 8 February 2017 European Union (Notice of Withdrawal) Bill, continued Matthew Pennycook Mr Graham Allen Ian Murray Ann Clwyd Valerie Vaz Heidi Alexander Stephen Timms Mike Gapes Liz Kendall Mr Ben Bradshaw Mrs Madeleine Moon Angela Smith Stephen Doughty Owen Smith Sarah Champion Mr Clive Betts Helen Goodman Seema
    [Show full text]
  • 2006-07 Annual Report
    ����������������������������� the chicago council on global affairs 1 The Chicago Council on Global Affairs, founded in 1922 as The Chicago Council on Foreign Relations, is a leading independent, nonpartisan organization committed to influencing the discourse on global issues through contributions to opinion and policy formation, leadership dialogue, and public learning. The Chicago Council brings the world to Chicago by hosting public programs and private events featuring world leaders and experts with diverse views on a wide range of global topics. Through task forces, conferences, studies, and leadership dialogue, the Council brings Chicago’s ideas and opinions to the world. 2 the chicago council on global affairs table of contents the chicago council on global affairs 3 Message from the Chairman The world has undergone On September 1, 2006, The Chicago Council on tremendous change since Foreign Relations became The Chicago Council on The Chicago Council was Global Affairs. The new name respects the Council’s founded in 1922, when heritage – a commitment to nonpartisanship and public nation-states dominated education – while it signals an understanding of the the international stage. changing world and reflects the Council’s increased Balance of power, national efforts to contribute to national and international security, statecraft, and discussions in a global era. diplomacy were foremost Changes at The Chicago Council are evident on on the agenda. many fronts – more and new programs, larger and more Lester Crown Today, our world diverse audiences, a step-up in the pace of task force is shaped increasingly by forces far beyond national reports and conferences, heightened visibility, increased capitals.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2014
    ANNUAL REPORT 2014 ANNUALREPORT2013.indd 1 11/11/2014 10:50:45 FABIAN EXECUTIVE 2013-14 Jessica Asato Chair, Fabian Society ur aim for the Fabian Society this year was to provide to the Executive for providing support and challenge, to Vice- ballast to underpin the Labour Party’s policy review and Chairs Kate Green MP and Steve Race, and to David Chaplin for Oto keep radical thinking at the heart of our deliberations his sure-footed managing of the budget. Thanks too to General on the left. The small, but dedicated team in our new offices in Secretary Andy Harrop and his Deputy Marcus Roberts for their Petty France haven’t disappointed. Influential reports such as unstinting work towards a better progressive future. Let’s hope Measure for Measure challenged the underlying measures of eco- next year brings not just a Labour government, but a new era of nomic success which failed to prevent the economic crisis, while radical progressive thinking in our politics. the Future Spending Choices Commission set out practical steps for reducing the deficit. FABIAN SOCIETY EXECUTIVE In turn, the media coverage of Fabian reports and events 2013-14 has burgeoned, ensuring we remain one of the most influential centre-left think tanks in the UK. It’s a good reminder in our 130th year of how powerful the practical application of ideas Jessica Asato (Chair) can be. We’re also proud to provide a space for interventions by Shadow Cabinet Ministers as they reach for the policies which Kate Green MP (Vice Chair) could help to catapult Labour back into government and are Steve Race (Vice Chair) pleased to have working closely with Labour’s Policy Review Chair, Jon Cruddas MP.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • FDN-274688 Disclosure
    FDN-274688 Disclosure MP Total Adam Afriyie 5 Adam Holloway 4 Adrian Bailey 7 Alan Campbell 3 Alan Duncan 2 Alan Haselhurst 5 Alan Johnson 5 Alan Meale 2 Alan Whitehead 1 Alasdair McDonnell 1 Albert Owen 5 Alberto Costa 7 Alec Shelbrooke 3 Alex Chalk 6 Alex Cunningham 1 Alex Salmond 2 Alison McGovern 2 Alison Thewliss 1 Alistair Burt 6 Alistair Carmichael 1 Alok Sharma 4 Alun Cairns 3 Amanda Solloway 1 Amber Rudd 10 Andrea Jenkyns 9 Andrea Leadsom 3 Andrew Bingham 6 Andrew Bridgen 1 Andrew Griffiths 4 Andrew Gwynne 2 Andrew Jones 1 Andrew Mitchell 9 Andrew Murrison 4 Andrew Percy 4 Andrew Rosindell 4 Andrew Selous 10 Andrew Smith 5 Andrew Stephenson 4 Andrew Turner 3 Andrew Tyrie 8 Andy Burnham 1 Andy McDonald 2 Andy Slaughter 8 FDN-274688 Disclosure Angela Crawley 3 Angela Eagle 3 Angela Rayner 7 Angela Smith 3 Angela Watkinson 1 Angus MacNeil 1 Ann Clwyd 3 Ann Coffey 5 Anna Soubry 1 Anna Turley 6 Anne Main 4 Anne McLaughlin 3 Anne Milton 4 Anne-Marie Morris 1 Anne-Marie Trevelyan 3 Antoinette Sandbach 1 Barry Gardiner 9 Barry Sheerman 3 Ben Bradshaw 6 Ben Gummer 3 Ben Howlett 2 Ben Wallace 8 Bernard Jenkin 45 Bill Wiggin 4 Bob Blackman 3 Bob Stewart 4 Boris Johnson 5 Brandon Lewis 1 Brendan O'Hara 5 Bridget Phillipson 2 Byron Davies 1 Callum McCaig 6 Calum Kerr 3 Carol Monaghan 6 Caroline Ansell 4 Caroline Dinenage 4 Caroline Flint 2 Caroline Johnson 4 Caroline Lucas 7 Caroline Nokes 2 Caroline Spelman 3 Carolyn Harris 3 Cat Smith 4 Catherine McKinnell 1 FDN-274688 Disclosure Catherine West 7 Charles Walker 8 Charlie Elphicke 7 Charlotte
    [Show full text]
  • Download (9MB)
    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details 2018 Behavioural Models for Identifying Authenticity in the Twitter Feeds of UK Members of Parliament A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF UK MPS’ TWEETS BETWEEN 2011 AND 2012; A LONGITUDINAL STUDY MARK MARGARETTEN Mark Stuart Margaretten Submitted for the degree of Doctor of PhilosoPhy at the University of Sussex June 2018 1 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................ 1 DECLARATION .................................................................................................................................. 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 5 FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................... 6 TABLES ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Anjali Austin
    Curriculum Vitae Anjali Austin Last Revised: December 13, 2013 General Information University address: School of Dance College of Visual Arts, Theatre and Dance 201 Montgomery Hall Florida State University Tallahassee, Florida 32306-2120 Phone: (850) 644-1024; Fax: (850) 644-1277 E-mail address: [email protected] Postdegree Education and Training 1996 Ballet Teachers Seminar, National Ballet School. Toronto, Canada. 1986–1995 Vocal Training, New York, NY. Studies: Musical Theatre. Instructors: Arabella Hong Young (1990-1995); Phyliss Grandy (1986-1989). 1990 Acting, Herbert Berghof Studios, New York, New York. Studies: Basic Acting Technique; Instructor: Salem Ludwig. 1978–1990 During this period I was a member of Dance Theatre of Harlem and worked with the following critically acclaimed ballet and contemporary teachers and choreographers. My experiences with these individuals included being cast in the restaging of classical and neo-classical ballets, new choreographic pieces, vocal roles and being coached, taught and mentored. Instructors: Geoffrey Holder, Louis Johnson, Frederick Franklin, Arthur Mitchell, Ruth Page, Glen Tetley, Valerie Bettis, John Taras, Terri Orr, Irina Nijinska, Alexandra Danilova, Agnes de Mille, Billy Wilson, John McFall. 1977–1975 Dance Theatre of Harlem - New York, New York. Major Studies: Classical and Contemporary Ballet, Pointe, Variations and Pas de Deux. Minor Studies: Contemporary, Modern, Graham, Jazz, Tap, West African Haitian, Character. 1975-1977 Instructors: Mary Barnett, Carmen de Lavallade, Alice Elliot, Vicki Fedine, William Glassman, Kathleen S. Grant, Mary Hinkson, Tanaquil Le Clercq, Arthur Mitchell, Melvin Purnell, Walter Raines, Victoria Simon, Karel Shook, Carol Sumner, Mel Tomlinson, DRAFT Vita for Anjali Austin Ann Tyus, Patricia Wilde. 1965–1973 Piano Training, San Francisco, California.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Marsh Exposes the Basic Problem of the Euro: No One's in Charge
    ‘Marsh exposes the basic problem of the euro: no one’s in charge. Monetary union was a colossally risky experiment launched without adequate crisis management precautions and without centralised political oversight. Unlike the other countries, Britain properly analysed the risks and decided, rightly, to stay out. It’s a pity that other Europeans didn’t show similar caution.’ —Lord (John) McFall, member of the House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee, former chair, House of Commons Treasury Committee ‘David Marsh has once again placed his finger on the gaping wounds that continue to afflict the European Monetary Union. While not everyone will agree with his conclusions – and a great many more will hope that he is wrong – he has built a cogent case for being very worried about the future of the single currency.’ —Prof. Michael Burda, School of Business and Economics, Humboldt University of Berlin ‘Europe is brilliantly right because it has achieved zero prospect of war, an achievement no other region can match. Yet it’s also brilliantly wrong because it has tried to achieve an impossible dream: monetary union without fiscal union. Marsh explains well the European mess and even suggests a solution. His book is a must-read for European policy-makers. Even Asians may learn a lesson or two.’ —Prof. Kishore Mahbubani, dean, Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore ‘A brilliant and incisive analysis of the intractable practical and political problems facing the euro and why the hopes of its founders have been disappointed.’ —Lord (Christopher) Tugendhat, chair, House of Lords EU External Affairs Committee, former European commissioner ‘The fate of the euro area is the most momentous public issue of our times and there is no better guide than this gripping, well-informed study by the leading expert on its genesis and development.’ —Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Banking Commission
    The Future of BankingThe Future Commissionof Banking Commission 2 Commissioners RT HON DAVID DAVIS MP (CHAIR) David is chairing the Future of Banking Commission. He is Conservative MP for Haltemprice and Howden and is a leading campaigner on civil liberties. His former roles include Shadow Home Secretary, Conservative Party Chairman and Chairman of the Public Accounts Committee. RT HON JOHN MCFALL From 2001-10, when he retired as Labour MP for West Dunbartonshire, John McFall was Chair of the influential House of Common’s Treasury Committee. In January, he was presented with the award of Which? Consumer Champion for 2009 for his role in improving financial services for consumers. RT HON DR VINCE CABLE MP It was in his capacity as the Liberal Democrat Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer that Vince served on the Commission. In May 2010 Vince was appointed Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills. PETER VICARY-SMITH Peter is the Chief Executive of Which?, the UK’s largest consumer body. Peter’s experience has been gained in both the charity and commercial sectors. He took up his appointment at Which? in August 2004. PHILIP AUGAR Philip is formerly a Group Managing Director at Schroders’ and now a writer on the financial services industry. He is the author of The‘ Death of Gentlemanly Capitalism: The Rise and Fall of London’s Investment Banks’. CLARE SPOTTISWOODE Clare is currently the Chair of Gas Strategies Limited. Her career started as an economist with the Treasury before establishing her own software company. Clare is perhaps best known for her role as Director General of Ofgas between 1993 and 1998.
    [Show full text]