Book of Proof Third Edition
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
[The PROOF of FERMAT's LAST THEOREM] and [OTHER MATHEMATICAL MYSTERIES] the World's Most Famous Math Problem the World's Most Famous Math Problem
0Eft- [The PROOF of FERMAT'S LAST THEOREM] and [OTHER MATHEMATICAL MYSTERIES] The World's Most Famous Math Problem The World's Most Famous Math Problem [ THE PROOF OF FERMAT'S LAST THEOREM AND OTHER MATHEMATICAL MYSTERIES I Marilyn vos Savant ST. MARTIN'S PRESS NEW YORK For permission to reprint copyrighted material, grateful acknowledgement is made to the following sources: The American Association for the Advancement of Science: Excerpts from Science, Volume 261, July 2, 1993, C 1993 by the AAAS. Reprinted by permission. Birkhauser Boston: Excerpts from The Mathematical Experience by Philip J. Davis and Reuben Hersh © 1981 Birkhauser Boston. Reprinted by permission of Birkhau- ser Boston and the authors. The Chronicleof Higher Education: Excerpts from The Chronicle of Higher Education, July 7, 1993, C) 1993 Chronicle of HigherEducation. Reprinted by permission. The New York Times: Excerpts from The New York Times, June 24, 1993, X) 1993 The New York Times. Reprinted by permission. Excerpts from The New York Times, June 29, 1993, © 1993 The New York Times. Reprinted by permission. Cody Pfanstieh/ The poem on the subject of Fermat's last theorem is reprinted cour- tesy of Cody Pfanstiehl. Karl Rubin, Ph.D.: The sketch of Dr. Wiles's proof of Fermat's Last Theorem in- cluded in the Appendix is reprinted courtesy of Karl Rubin, Ph.D. Wesley Salmon, Ph.D.: Excerpts from Zeno's Paradoxes by Wesley Salmon, editor © 1970. Reprinted by permission of the editor. Scientific American: Excerpts from "Turing Machines," by John E. Hopcroft, Scientific American, May 1984, (D 1984 Scientific American, Inc. -
Mathematics and Computation
Mathematics and Computation Mathematics and Computation Ideas Revolutionizing Technology and Science Avi Wigderson Princeton University Press Princeton and Oxford Copyright c 2019 by Avi Wigderson Requests for permission to reproduce material from this work should be sent to [email protected] Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, 6 Oxford Street, Woodstock, Oxfordshire OX20 1TR press.princeton.edu All Rights Reserved Library of Congress Control Number: 2018965993 ISBN: 978-0-691-18913-0 British Library Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available Editorial: Vickie Kearn, Lauren Bucca, and Susannah Shoemaker Production Editorial: Nathan Carr Jacket/Cover Credit: THIS INFORMATION NEEDS TO BE ADDED WHEN IT IS AVAILABLE. WE DO NOT HAVE THIS INFORMATION NOW. Production: Jacquie Poirier Publicity: Alyssa Sanford and Kathryn Stevens Copyeditor: Cyd Westmoreland This book has been composed in LATEX The publisher would like to acknowledge the author of this volume for providing the camera-ready copy from which this book was printed. Printed on acid-free paper 1 Printed in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Dedicated to the memory of my father, Pinchas Wigderson (1921{1988), who loved people, loved puzzles, and inspired me. Ashgabat, Turkmenistan, 1943 Contents Acknowledgments 1 1 Introduction 3 1.1 On the interactions of math and computation..........................3 1.2 Computational complexity theory.................................6 1.3 The nature, purpose, and style of this book............................7 1.4 Who is this book for?........................................7 1.5 Organization of the book......................................8 1.6 Notation and conventions..................................... -
Cantor's Paradise Regained: Constructive Mathematics From
Cantor's Paradise Regained: Constructive Mathematics from Brouwer to Kolmogorov to Gelfond Vladik Kreinovich Department of Computer Science University of Texas at El Paso El Paso, TX 79968 USA [email protected] Abstract. Constructive mathematics, mathematics in which the exis- tence of an object means that that we can actually construct this object, started as a heavily restricted version of mathematics, a version in which many commonly used mathematical techniques (like the Law of Excluded Middle) were forbidden to maintain constructivity. Eventually, it turned out that not only constructive mathematics is not a weakened version of the classical one { as it was originally perceived { but that, vice versa, classical mathematics can be viewed as a particular (thus, weaker) case of the constructive one. Crucial results in this direction were obtained by M. Gelfond in the 1970s. In this paper, we mention the history of these results, and show how these results affected constructive mathematics, how they led to new algorithms, and how they affected the current ac- tivity in logic programming-related research. Keywords: constructive mathematics; logic programming; algorithms Science and engineering: a brief reminder. One of the main objectives of science is to find out how the world operates, to be able to predict what will happen in the future. Science predicts the future positions of celestial bodies, the future location of a spaceship, etc. From the practical viewpoint, it is important not only to passively predict what will happen, but also to decide what to do in order to achieve certain goals. Roughly speaking, decisions of this type correspond not to science but to engineering. -
Hacker's Handbook Ok Just a Quick Note, This Is a Very Early Version of the Book and Was Later Banned
Hacker's Handbook Ok just a quick note, this is a very early version of the book and was later banned. We've done our best in converting it to ASCII. It's taken us some time to put it together because of the reformatting, so I hope it's appreciated. We have kept to the original page numbering for so that the index will be correct. Compliments Electronic Images - Gizmo Century Communications - T H E - - H A C K E R ' S - - H A N D B O O K - Copyright (c) Hugo Cornwall All rights reserved First published in Great Britain in 1985 by Century Communications Ltd Portland House, 12-13 Greek Street, London W1V 5LE. Reprinted 1985 (four times) ISBN 0 7126 0650 5 Printed and bound in Great Britain by Billing & Sons Limited, Worcester. CONTENTS Introduction vii First Principles 2 Computer-to-computer communications 7 3 Hackers' Equipment 15 4 Targets: What you can find on mainframes 30 5 Hackers' Intelligence 42 6 Hackers' Techniques 57 7 Networks 69 8 Viewdata systems 86 9 Radio computer data 99 10 Hacking: the future 108 file:///E|/Books/Hackers Handbook.htm (1 of 133) [11/28/2000 5:58:48 AM] Hacker's Handbook Appendices I troubleshooting 112 II Glossary 117 III CCITT and related standards 130 IV Standard computer alphabets 132 V Modems 141 VI Radio Spectrum 144 VII Port-finder flow chart 148 INTRODUCTION The word 'hacker' is used in two different but associated ways: for some, a hacker is merely a computer enthusiast of any kind, who loves working with the beasties for their own sake, as opposed to operating them in order to enrich a company or research project --or to play games. -
Constructive Algorithm Alex Tung 27/2/2016
Constructive Algorithm Alex Tung 27/2/2016 Constructive Algorithm • Gives an answer by explicit construction of one • Designing a constructive algorithm usually requires a lot of rough work and/or insight and/or intuition Construction Problems in OI • Construction problems are problems solvable using a constructive algorithm • Usually oe iteestig ad less stadad Hee popula i OI • Many difficult constructive problems are brilliant :D • Personal experience (in OI/ACM): • Theorem 1. It feels awesome to solve a nontrivial construction problem in contest. • Theorem 2. If I am able to solve a construction problem in contest, it is trivial. Examples from HKOI 2015/16 • Junior Q1 (Model Answer) • Find a model answer to make Alice pass and others fail • Senior Q3 (Arithmetic Sequence) • Find a sequence without length-3 arithmetic subsequence Example from Math • Q1. Prove that for all positive integers N, there exists N consecutive composite numbers. • Hint: consider (N+1)! • A. N+! + , N+! + , …, N+! + N, N+! + N+ ae N consecutive composite numbers. Non-example from Math • Q. Betad’s postulate Pove that fo all positive iteges N, thee exists a prime number in the interval [N, 2N]. • Do you think a constructive proof exists for Q2? • A2. For those interested: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_of_Bertrand's_postulate How to solve a construction problem • Step 1: Identify it as a construction problem • Step 2a: Look for concepts related to this problem • Step 2b: Try small examples, observe a pattern • Step 3: Make a guess • Step 4: Convince yourself that it is correct • Step 5: Code! • If AC, congratulations • Otherwise, debug/go back to step 3 Step 1: Identify a construction problem • ad-ho, i.e. -
Constructivity in Homotopy Type Theory
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy Constructivity in Homotopy Type Theory Author: Supervisors: Maximilian Doré Prof. Dr. Dr. Hannes Leitgeb Prof. Steve Awodey, PhD Munich, August 2019 Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Logic and Philosophy of Science contents Contents 1 Introduction1 1.1 Outline................................ 3 1.2 Open Problems ........................... 4 2 Judgements and Propositions6 2.1 Judgements ............................. 7 2.2 Propositions............................. 9 2.2.1 Dependent types...................... 10 2.2.2 The logical constants in HoTT .............. 11 2.3 Natural Numbers.......................... 13 2.4 Propositional Equality....................... 14 2.5 Equality, Revisited ......................... 17 2.6 Mere Propositions and Propositional Truncation . 18 2.7 Universes and Univalence..................... 19 3 Constructive Logic 22 3.1 Brouwer and the Advent of Intuitionism ............ 22 3.2 Heyting and Kolmogorov, and the Formalization of Intuitionism 23 3.3 The Lambda Calculus and Propositions-as-types . 26 3.4 Bishop’s Constructive Mathematics................ 27 4 Computational Content 29 4.1 BHK in Homotopy Type Theory ................. 30 4.2 Martin-Löf’s Meaning Explanations ............... 31 4.2.1 The meaning of the judgments.............. 32 4.2.2 The theory of expressions................. 34 4.2.3 Canonical forms ...................... 35 4.2.4 The validity of the types.................. 37 4.3 Breaking Canonicity and Propositional Canonicity . 38 4.3.1 Breaking canonicity .................... 39 4.3.2 Propositional canonicity.................. 40 4.4 Proof-theoretic Semantics and the Meaning Explanations . 40 5 Constructive Identity 44 5.1 Identity in Martin-Löf’s Meaning Explanations......... 45 ii contents 5.1.1 Intensional type theory and the meaning explanations 46 5.1.2 Extensional type theory and the meaning explanations 47 5.2 Homotopical Interpretation of Identity ............ -
Lecture Notes on Constructive Logic: Overview
Lecture Notes on Constructive Logic: Overview 15-317: Constructive Logic Frank Pfenning Lecture 1 August 29, 2017 1 Introduction According to Wikipedia, logic is the study of the principles of valid infer- ences and demonstration. From the breadth of this definition it is immedi- ately clear that logic constitutes an important area in the disciplines of phi- losophy and mathematics. Logical tools and methods also play an essential role in the design, specification, and verification of computer hardware and software. It is these applications of logic in computer science which will be the focus of this course. In order to gain a proper understanding of logic and its relevance to computer science, we will need to draw heavily on the much older logical traditions in philosophy and mathematics. We will dis- cuss some of the relevant history of logic and pointers to further reading throughout these notes. In this introduction, we give only a brief overview of the goal, contents, and approach of this class. 2 Topics The course is divided into four parts: I. Proofs as Evidence for Truth II. Proofs as Programs III. Proof Search as Computation IV. Substructural and Modal Logics LECTURE NOTES AUGUST 29, 2017 L1.2 Constructive Logic: Overview Proofs are central in all parts of the course, and give it its constructive na- ture. In each part, we will exhibit connections between proofs and forms of computations studied in computer science. These connections will take quite different forms, which shows the richness of logic as a foundational discipline at the nexus between philosophy, mathematics, and computer science. -
On the Constructive Content of Proofs
On the Constructive Content of Proofs Monika Seisenberger M¨unchen 2003 On the Constructive Content of Proofs Monika Seisenberger Dissertation an der Fakult¨atf¨urMathematik und Informatik der Ludwig–Maximilians–Universit¨atM¨unchen vorgelegt von Monika Seisenberger M¨arz 2003 Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. H. Schwichtenberg Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. W. Buchholz Tag der m¨undlichen Pr¨ufung:10. Juli 2003 Abstract This thesis aims at exploring the scopes and limits of techniques for extract- ing programs from proofs. We focus on constructive theories of inductive definitions and classical systems allowing choice principles. Special emphasis is put on optimizations that allow for the extraction of realistic programs. Our main field of application is infinitary combinatorics. Higman’s Lemma, having an elegant non-constructive proof due to Nash-Williams, constitutes an interesting case for the problem of discovering the constructive content behind a classical proof. We give two distinct solutions to this problem. First, we present a proof of Higman’s Lemma for an arbitrary alphabet in a theory of inductive definitions. This proof may be considered as a constructive counterpart to Nash-Williams’ minimal-bad-sequence proof. Secondly, using a refined A-translation method, we directly transform the classical proof into a constructive one and extract a program. The crucial point in the latter is that we do not need to avoid the axiom of classical dependent choice but directly assign a realizer to its translation. A generalization of Higman’s Lemma is Kruskal’s Theorem. We present a constructive proof of Kruskal’s Theorem that is completely formalized in a theory of inductive definitions. -
Proof Theory of Constructive Systems: Inductive Types and Univalence
Proof Theory of Constructive Systems: Inductive Types and Univalence Michael Rathjen Department of Pure Mathematics University of Leeds Leeds LS2 9JT, England [email protected] Abstract In Feferman’s work, explicit mathematics and theories of generalized inductive definitions play a cen- tral role. One objective of this article is to describe the connections with Martin-L¨of type theory and constructive Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory. Proof theory has contributed to a deeper grasp of the rela- tionship between different frameworks for constructive mathematics. Some of the reductions are known only through ordinal-theoretic characterizations. The paper also addresses the strength of Voevodsky’s univalence axiom. A further goal is to investigate the strength of intuitionistic theories of generalized inductive definitions in the framework of intuitionistic explicit mathematics that lie beyond the reach of Martin-L¨of type theory. Key words: Explicit mathematics, constructive Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory, Martin-L¨of type theory, univalence axiom, proof-theoretic strength MSC 03F30 03F50 03C62 1 Introduction Intuitionistic systems of inductive definitions have figured prominently in Solomon Feferman’s program of reducing classical subsystems of analysis and theories of iterated inductive definitions to constructive theories of various kinds. In the special case of classical theories of finitely as well as transfinitely iterated inductive definitions, where the iteration occurs along a computable well-ordering, the program was mainly completed by Buchholz, Pohlers, and Sieg more than 30 years ago (see [13, 19]). For stronger theories of inductive 1 i definitions such as those based on Feferman’s intutitionic Explicit Mathematics (T0) some answers have been provided in the last 10 years while some questions are still open. -
Miscellaneous Repairs Chesapeake City Bridge Construction Solicitation
IFB W912BU21B0004 US Army Corps of Engineers Philadelphia District Miscellaneous Repairs Chesapeake City Bridge Chesapeake City, Maryland Construction Solicitation and Specifications 15 June 2021 This page was intentionally left blank for duplex printing. INVITATION NO. W912BU21B0004 PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS INVITATION FOR BIDS FOR MISCELLANEOUS REPAIRS CHESAPEAKE CITY BRIDGE CHESAPEAKE CITY, MARYLAND I. NOTE THE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION REQUIREMENT OF THE EQUAL OPPORTUNITY CLAUSE WHICH MAY APPLY TO THE CONTRACT RESULTING FROM THIS SOLICITATION. II. BIDDERS ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE REPRESENTATION AND CERTIFICATIONS PORTION OF SECTION 00 45 00 OF THIS SOLICITATION AND SUBMIT THIS WITH THEIR OFFER. III. PROSPECTIVE BIDDERS ARE INVITED TO VISIT THE SITE TO ACQUAINT THEMSELVES WITH THE SITE CONDITIONS AND ANY PROBLEMS INCIDENT TO THE PROSECUTION OF THE WORK. THE SITE VISIT WILL BE HELD ON 22 JUNE 2021. THE SITE VISIT WILL BEGIN AT 10:00 AM AT THE CHESAPEAKE CITY PROJECT Office - C&D CANAL 815 BETHEL ROAD, CHESAPEAKE CITY, MARYLAND 21915. ALL THOSE PLANNING TO ATTEND MUST CONTACT MR. MIKE HART VIA EMAIL AT [email protected], PRIOR TO THE SITE VISIT. 15 JUNE 2021 This page was intentionally left blank for duplex printing. SOLICITATION, OFFER, 1. SOLICITATION NO. 2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION 3. DATE ISSUED PAGE OF PAGES AND AWARD X SEALED BID (IFB) 15-Jun-2021 W912BU21B0004 1 OF 41 (Construction, Alteration, or Repair) NEGOTIATED(RFP) IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror. 4. CONTRACT NO. 5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO. 7. ISSUED BY CODE W912BU 8. -
2019-2020 Catalog
2019-2020 Catalog Creating Opportunities. Changing Lives. Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………………………………………….. 1 - 22 Enrollment Information…………………………………………………………… 23- 46 Expenses (Tuition & Fees)………………………………………………………… 47- 50 Financial Aid and Veterans Affairs Information………………………………….. 51- 57 Academic Policies………………………………………………………………… 58- 76 Other Regulations………………………………………………………………… 77- 99 Programs of Study (Curricula-Credit)……………………………………………. 100-211 Accounting and Finance………………………………………………….. 103-105 Advertising & Graphic Design…………………………………………… 106-108 Agribusiness Technology………………………………………………… 109-113 Associate Degree Nursing………………………………………………… 114-115 Associate in Arts (College Transfer)……………………………………… 116-119 Associate in General Education…………………………………………… 120-125 Associate in Science (College Transfer)………………………………….. 126-129 Automotive Systems Technology………………………………………… 130-136 Business Administration………………………………………………….. 137-140 Business Administration- Human Resource Management……………….. 141 Collision Repair & Refinishing Technology……………………………... 142-144 Computer-Integrated Machining…………………………………………. 145-149 Cosmetology……………………………………………………………… 150-155 Criminal Justice Technology…………………………………………….. 156-158 Early Childhood Education………………………………………………. 159-164 Electrical Systems Technology…………………………………………... 165-168 Healthcare Management Technology……………………………………. 169-171 Human Services Technology…………………………………………….. 172-174 HST/ Substance Abuse Concentration…………………………………… 175-176 Humanities/Fine Arts and Social/ Behavioral -
Academic Catalog
2020-2021 ACADEMIC CATALOG One Hundred and Twenty-Eighth Session Lynchburg, Virginia The contents of this catalog represent the most current information available at the time of publication. During the period of time covered by this catalog, it is reasonable to expect changes to be made without prior notice. Thus, the provisions of this catalog are not to be regarded as an irrevocable contract between the College and the student. The Academic Catalog is produced by the Registrar’s Office in cooperation with various other offices. 2 Academic Calendar, 2020-2021 Undergraduate (UG) Programs (Dates subject to change) FALL 2020 AUGUST Thurs 13 SUPER Program begins Fri 14 STAR Program begins Mon 17 Summer grades due Thurs 20 Move-in for First Years begins at 9:00 am Thurs-Sat 20-23 New Student Orientation Sat 22 Move-in for all other students Mon 24 Fall UG classes begin Wed 26 Summer Incomplete work due from students Fri 28 End of add period for full semester and 1st quarter (UG classes) Last day to file Fall Independent Study forms SEPTEMBER Fri 4 End of 1st quarter drop period for UG classes Last day for students w/ Spring Incompletes to submit required work Fri 11 Grades due for Spring Incompletes Last day for seniors to apply for graduation in May 2021 Fri 18 End of full semester drop period and audit period OCTOBER Fri 2 End of 1st quarter “W” period (UG classes) Spring 2021 course schedules due by noon (all programs) Fri 9 End of 1st quarter UG classes Mon 12 2nd quarter UG classes begin Wed 14 Midterm grades due by 10:00 am for full-semester