Community Design Element

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Community Design Element City of Palm Desert/Adopted 3.15.04 Comprehensive General Plan/Community Design Element COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT PURPOSE The purpose of the Community Design Element is to set forth fundamental concepts and principles that will assure the highest possible quality of life, guiding and directing the physical design and development of the City of Palm Desert. In this regard, the element is intended to encourage creativity and design excellence in community design and development, which results in a community that is attractive, cohesive and in harmony with the natural setting and surrounding communities. Furthermore, the Community Design Element proposes design concepts and principles that enhance the community’s functional characteristics, to create a more livable, efficient and sustainable city. The Community Design Element helps the City examine current patterns of development, and identifies the City's challenges, resources, and opportunities for enhanced community design. The element also sets forth a land use and conservation ethic that is integral to protecting the City's most important and valuable characteristics. The goals, policies and programs bring together the principals of other elements into an overall set of qualitative guidelines that help enhance community connectivity, preserve the natural environment and improve the quality of living for all residents and visitors. They provide guidance to enhance the appearance of existing and new commercial and industrial development, residential neighborhoods, streets, public facilities, and parks and open spaces. The element is also intended to promote a more sustainable and healthy community. BACKGROUND The Community Design Element is interactive with and responsive to several other elements of the General Plan, including Land Use, Circulation, Open Space and Conservation, Parks and Recreation, and Arts and Culture. The Community Design Element addresses the fundamental issues of these other elements and combines these ideas in a single element. The Community Design Element is effective when the management of land use, traffic, community safety and appearance, and environmental systems promotes continuity, uniqueness and a special sense of place. On a more basic level, the Community Design Element reflects sensitivity to community quality, environmental integrity and a desire to preserve the best qualities of this resort residential community, while addressing the more practical and functional needs of it’s residents, businesses and visitors. The state of California recognizes the necessity of standards in community design and development in Government Code and regulations. Government Code Section 65302 states that, “the General Plan shall consist of a statement of development policies and shall include diagram or diagrams and text setting forth objectives, principles, standards and plan proposals.” Government Code Section 65302(a) addresses standards that affect population density and building intensity. Mandates for the preservation of open space lands are set forth in Government Code sections 66477 and 65470. Community Design Element III-135 City of Palm Desert/Adopted 3.15.04 Comprehensive General Plan/Community Design Element State legislation also reinforces the adoption of community design standards. The 1990 California Legislature enactment of Assembly Bill 325, the Water Conservation In Landscaping Act, recognizes the state’s responsibility in mitigating the effects of urbanization on its finite water resources, and the potential savings from water conserving landscape practices. In accordance with the act, the City has adopted a water conserving landscape ordinance, which meets conservation targets and addresses community design concerns. Water conservation in landscape design is having a profound effect on community design. By implementing the essential goals and policies of the Community Design Element the City confirms its support for sustaining and enhancing the quality of life and the built environment in the City. In addition to staff-level implementation of community design standards, the Architectural Review Board Commission, Planning Commission and City Council review and approve public and private development design proposals. Environmentally and aesthetically sensitive design is essential to the preservation and enhancement of the character and values of the community. Controlling the type and intensity of land uses, managing transportation, flood control facilities, and protecting community open space and conservation areas must compliment both the built and natural environments. The Resort Community: A Tale of Two Cities Not all segments of the community will measure quality of life by the same yardstick. Developments and neighborhoods in Palm Desert can be divided into two types, A) residential and hotel resorts that serve the tourist, vacation and second home markets, and B) developments and neighborhoods that are geared to the City's permanent population. Many of the needs and community design issues of each differ, while others are common concerns of all facets of the community. Vacationers and Seasonal Residents Residential resorts and vacation-oriented developments serve seasonal residents (snow birds) and short-term visitors. These developments range from gated golf course communities to timeshare and hotel-based resorts typically with their own golf and other recreational amenities. Seasonal residents and visitors to these developments are focused on vacationing and relaxation in a tranquil and largely self-contained environment, and do not typically involve themselves in the full range of community activities. Therefore, the internal relationships within these developments are more important than their relationship to some of the City's commercial districts, institutions, parks and open space, and other public facilities. Seasonal residents in the destination resort communities are typically less interested in engaging in the external neighborhoods of the general community. Nonetheless, the quality, attractiveness and safety of the community have a direct effect on the desirability of Palm Desert as a destination second home and tourist resort. Permanent Resident Community Permanent residents benefit from the full range of commercial, institutional and recreational services and opportunities available in the City. These include the many services and uses enjoyed by the City's vacationers and seasonal residents, including fine dining, specialty retail, entertainment, golf and other recreational amenities. Community Design Element III-136 City of Palm Desert/Adopted 3.15.04 Comprehensive General Plan/Community Design Element Permanent residents are the core of the community and typically live in neighborhoods where knowing and interacting with neighbors is the essence of a tight-knit community. Ideally, permanent residents, including families with children, should have a reasonable expectation of safe and convenient access to parks, shopping and other community services and amenities without the need to travel great distances or to rely primarily on the arterial roadway network. Community Design and Quality of Life The essential purpose or goal of effective community design is to assure the highest possible quality of life for the City's residents, whether part- or full-time, and for those who come to visit and vacation here. Community design issues encompass all aspects of the City, including its residential and commercial neighborhoods. Properly designed and integrated neighborhoods include a diverse cross section of the community and provide convenient opportunities for social interaction between residents. They are also small enough and have a sufficient level of interconnectivity to retain a distinct neighborhood identity. Creating and sustaining distinct neighborhoods is essential to the concept of community. In general terms, quality of life can be addressed by assuring the following: • An integrated community with a full range of housing, shopping and commercial services, work places, schools, parks and open space, and civic and institutional facilities essential to the daily life of the residents • A land use pattern that efficiently distributes homes, employment centers, parks, schools and other institutions, shopping and services • A logical and efficient hierarchy of streets that are part of a connected network, which disperses traffic by providing a variety of pedestrian and vehicular routes to any destination • A distributed system of physical and service infrastructure that provides for the efficient delivery of utilities and public services SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY DESIGN The concept of sustainable communities has only emerged fully in the last decade and sustainability still has many definitions and meanings. From an economist's perspective, sustainable community design is a means of ensuring the maintenance of our standard of living and quality of life. From an ecological perspective, sustainability involves a holistic view of the physical environment that includes not only humanity but also the physical and ecological context in which we are embedded. The sustainable community is integrated with its environment in a manner that optimizes its maintenance over time. Major elements of the sustainable community include environmental health, energy efficiency, land use relationships and efficiencies, resource use and management, and efficient traffic and circulation. Economic vitality is also a primary component of sustainable
Recommended publications
  • Maintaining Residential Integration: Municipal Practices and Law
    Cleveland State Law Review Volume 31 Issue 4 Article 4 1982 Maintaining Residential Integration: Municipal Practices and Law Kermit J. Lind Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev Part of the Housing Law Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Recommended Citation Kermit J. Lind, Maintaining Residential Integration: Municipal Practices and Law, 31 Clev. St. L. Rev. 603 (1982) available at https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev/vol31/iss4/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cleveland State Law Review by an authorized editor of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MAINTAINING RESIDENTIAL INTEGRATION: MUNICIPAL PRACTICES AND LAW KERMIT J. LIND* I. INTRODUCTION ......................................... 603 II. BACKGROUND .......................................... 606 III. LEGAL FRAMEWORK .................................... 611 A. Civil Rights Act of 1866 ............................ 612 B . Title VIII ......................................... 613 C. The Constitution ................................... 620 IV. POLICIES AND PROGRAMS ............................... 629 A. Knowledge of Conditions and Changes ................ 630 B. Local Legislation and Policy Statements .............. 633 C. Controlling Unfavorable Real Estate Practices ........ 635 D. Affirmative Action
    [Show full text]
  • Montgomery County Common Ownership Community Manual
    COMMON OWNERSHIP COMMUNITY MANUAL & RESOURCE GUIDE Prepared by: Montgomery County Commission on Common Ow nership Communities Department of Housing & Community Affairs 1401 Rockville Pike, 4th Floor Rockville, Maryland 20852 2019 Copyright 2019, Montgomery County Commission on Common Ownership Communities. This Manual provides general information only and is not intended to give accounting, legal, or investment advice. Please contact a licensed professional advisor before relying on any information contained herein. 1 MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION AND PANEL CHAIRS Jaunary 2019 COMMISSIONERS Mark Fine, Chairman Mike Burrows, Vice Chair & Chair - Information & Tech. Committee Ilana Branda, Chair – Legislative Committee Marietta Ethier, Esq., Chair – Process/Procedure Committee Kathy Viney, Chair – Education Committee Rand Fishbein, Ph.D., Commissioner, Ex-Officio Chair David Gardner, Esq., Commissioner Staci Gelfound, AMS, PCAM, Commissioner, Ex-Officio Chair Leonard Malamud, Esq., Commissioner Peter Myo Khin, Commissioner Andrew Oxendine, Commissioner Donald J. Perper, CMCA, PCAM, Commissioner Galia Steinbach, Commissioner Dallas Valley, Commissioner Aimee Winegar, CMCA, LSM, PCAM, Commissioner, Ex-Officio Vice Chair COMMISSION PANEL CHAIRS Hon. Bruce Birchman, Esq. Rachel Browder, Esq. Brian Fellner, Esq. Charles Fleischer, Esq. Sarah Stanton, Esq. Dinah Stevens, Esq. Partap Verma, Esq. Mediators Michael Lang Sarah Stanton Partap Verma Timothy Goetzinger, Acting Director, Montgomery County, Department of Housing and Community Affairs 2 3
    [Show full text]
  • Fairfax County Community Association Manual and Are Pertinent to Community Association Interests
    FAIRFAX COUNTY COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION MANUAL Written and Published by: Fairfax County Department of Cable Communications and Consumer Protection Consumer Protection Division Tel. 703-222-8435 FAX 703-222-5921 TDD 703-222-8653 Rev. 04 Fairfax County, Virginia BOARD OF SUPERVISORS GERALD E. CONNOLLY CHAIRMAN SHARON BULOVA VICE CHAIRMAN BRADDOCK DISTRICT JOAN M. DUBOIS GERALD W. HYLAND DRANESVILLE DISTRICT MOUNT VERNON DISTRICT MICHAEL R. FREY DANA KAUFFMAN SULLY DISTRICT LEE DISTRICT PENELOPE A. GROSS ELAINE McCONNELL MASON DISTRICT SPRINGFIELD DISTRICT CATHERINE M. HUDGINS LINDA Q. SMYTH HUNTER MILL DISTRICT PROVIDENCE DISTRICT ANTHONY H. GRIFFIN COUNTY EXECUTIVE DAVID J. MOLCHANY CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY GAIL CONDRICK, DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF CABLE COMMUNICATIONS AND CONSUMER PROTECTION Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Policy Fairfax County is committed to nondiscrimination and supports the provisions of ADA in providing equal access with respect to all of its programs, services and employment to individuals with disabilities. TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents............................................................................................................................. i Acknowledgements........................................................................................................................ vi Preface.......................................................................................................................................... viii Introduction...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Making Sustainable Regional Design Strategies Successful
    sustainability Article Making Sustainable Regional Design Strategies Successful Anastasia Nikologianni 1,*, Kathryn Moore 1 and Peter J. Larkham 2 1 School of Architecture and Design, Birmingham City University, City Centre Campus, B4 7BD Birmingham, UK; [email protected] 2 School of Engineering and the Built Environment, Birmingham City University, B4 7BD Birmingham, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-(0)-7557386272 Received: 18 December 2018; Accepted: 8 February 2019; Published: 16 February 2019 Abstract: This paper identifies innovative methods of strategic spatial design to demonstrate the sustainable outcomes that can be achieved by adopting landscape practices to future-proof our cities and regions. A range of strategic landscape-led models and methodologies are investigated to reveal the structure, administrative processes and key elements that have been adopted in order to facilitate the integration of climate change environmental design and landscape quality. We have found that a strong established framework that demonstrates innovative project management and early integration of environmental ideas is critical in order to be able to deliver landscape schemes that appropriately identify and address current climatic and social challenges. Furthermore, to make a real difference in the way that professional practice and politics deal with landscape infrastructure, the project framework and key concepts related to landscape design and planning, such as low carbon design and spatial quality, need to be clearly supported by legislation and policy at all levels. Together with close attention to the importance of design, this approach is more likely to ensure effective implementation and smooth communication during the development of a landscape scheme, leading to higher levels of sustainability and resilience in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Justice + Landscape Architecture: a Student's Guide
    ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE a students’ guide This guide was written by three masters of landscape architecture students who wanted to learn more about how landscape architecture can promote social justice and equity through design. In 2016 we became the student representatives for the ASLA's Environmental Justice Professional Practice Network so we could better connect the important work of professionals, academics, and activists working towards environmental justice with students. This guide is a response to our own desires to educate ourselves about environmental justice and share what we learned. It is a starting-off place for students - a compendium of resources, conversations, case studies, and activities students can work though and apply to their studio projects. It is a continuously evolving project and we invite you to get in touch to give us feedback, ask questions, and give us ideas for this guide. We are: Kari Spiegelhalter Cornell University Masters of Landscape Architecture 2018 [email protected] Tess Ruswick Cornell University Masters of Landscape Architecture 2018 [email protected] Patricia Noto Rhode Island School of Design Masters of Landscape Architecture 2018 [email protected] We have a long list of people to thank who helped us seek resources, gave advice, feedback and support as this guide was written. We'd like to give a huge thank you to: The ASLA Environmental Justice Professional Practice Network for helping us get this project off the ground, especially Erin McDonald, Matt Romero, Julie Stevens,
    [Show full text]
  • Plpr Volos Private Residential
    PLPR VOLOS PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES: A CROSS CULTURAL COMPARISON DWIGHT H. MERRIAM, FAICP ROBINSON & COLE LLP HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT USA In the last half-century throughout the world there has been a near geometric increase in the number of private residential communities, many of them gated and secured from their larger communities. England, New Zealand, France, Portugal, Spain, Mexico, China, South Africa, Russia, Argentina and numerous other Latin American countries, Lebanon, and the United States of America have all experienced this growth in varying ways and with some similar impacts and some different ones. This article reviews the experiences across several nations for a cross-cultural comparison to identify points of commonality and differences and how we might learn from each other in terms of managing private residential communities now and in the future. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA In 1964 there were fewer than 500 so-called “common interest developments.” The terminology here reaches a number of different types of development and organizational scenarios. Common interest developments include single-family residential developments where there are covenants and cross-easements and other legal restrictions imposed on individual property owners. The term might also include condominiums which are not so much a form of development as they are a form of ownership in which individual residential units are owned individually. In condominiums, in addition to the privately-owned units there are “limited common elements” which might include a porch or patio and a small backyard, and “common elements” shared equally and openly by all owners, including access drives, parking, parks, recreational amenities. We also have cooperative ownership arrangements under which an entire building or group of buildings is owned by a single corporation and individual tenants live under perpetual tenancy- in-common arrangements.
    [Show full text]
  • School of Design and Community Development 1
    School of Design and Community Development 1 School of Design and Community Development Nature of the School The majors in the School of Design and Community Development focus on improving the quality of life of individuals and groups by designing interactions, educational programs, and services between people and their environments to better address the needs and desires of communities and their residents. We imagine, educate, evaluate, plan, and produce experiences, products, settings and services that have the potential to transform lives. Given the range of our programs and the portability of skills taught in them, outcomes for students vary. Our graduates find employment in professional design settings and interdisciplinary firms; in communities as teachers, as extension agents, and community development specialists. Graduates create careers as entrepreneurs and in traditional design, business and retail settings. And others find placement in a wide spectrum of innovative organizations that use design and design thinking as a way to fully understand and engage with their clients and markets. Study abroad is strongly encouraged in all of our programs, and is required in Interior Design. Accreditation The agricultural and extension education program is accredited by the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE). The fashion, dress and merchandising program is an affiliate member of the Textile and Apparel Programs Accreditation Commission (TAPAC). The interior design program is accredited by the National Association of Schools of Art and Design (NASAD). The landscape architecture program is accredited by the American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA). FACULTY DIRECTOR • Peter Butler - M.L.A. (Iowa State) Landscape Architecture - Cultural landscape planning and interpretation, Community design processes, Design pedagogy PROFESSORS • Cindy Beacham - Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Poverty Alleviation by Relocation Under the Link Policy: a Case Study from Tongyu County, Jilin Province, China
    Article Evaluating Poverty Alleviation by Relocation under the Link Policy: A Case Study from Tongyu County, Jilin Province, China Cunming Zou, Jianzhi Liu, Bencheng Liu, Xuhan Zheng and Yangang Fang * School of Geographical Sciences of Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China; [email protected] (C.Z.); [email protected] (J.L.); [email protected] (B.L.); [email protected] (X.Z.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-431-85099550 Received: 7 September 2019; Accepted: 10 September 2019; Published: 16 September 2019 Abstract: Land, nature, and the social environment in contiguous poor regions are harsh and difficult to change. The poor adaptive capacities of the socio-ecological systems of these regions are the main causes of deep, persistent poverty. In February 2016, the Chinese government issued a policy proposing to promote poverty alleviation by relocation (PAR) by means of the “Linking increases in urban construction land with decreases in rural construction land” policy (or simply, the “Link Policy” or LP), which intends to realize the sustainable social and economic development of local villages. Since then, many pilot projects have been carried out across the country based on local resources, environment, and economic development; however, few related studies on these cases have been conducted. After a review of poverty alleviation policies, this paper first introduces the unsustainable conditions of poor rural areas and the implications and advantages of PAR under the Link Policy; we then analyzed the complete PAR process, including formulation, implementation, and completion, by taking Tongyu County in Jilin Province as an example. The study found that the “whole village relocation” model practiced in Tongyu County was relatively successful in terms of improving the living environment, income, and public services of local villagers.
    [Show full text]
  • Home Landscape Planning Worksheet: 12 Steps to a Functional Design
    Home Landscape Planning Worksheet: 12 steps to a functional design This worksheet will guide you through the process of Gather information designing a functional landscape plan. The process includes these steps: Step 1. Make a scale drawing • Gather information about the site and who will use it. Landscape designs are generally drawn from a bird’s- • Prioritize needs and wants. eye view in what designers call “plan view.” To prepare a base map (scale drawing) of your property use graph • Consider maintenance requirements. paper and let one square equal a certain number of feet • Determine a budget. (e.g. 1 square = 2 feet), or draw it to scale using a ruler • Organize the landscape space. or scale (e.g. 1 inch = 8 feet). • Determine the shape of the spaces and how they The base map should include these features: relate to each other. • Scale used • Select the plants that will fi ll the landscape. • North directional arrow • Property lines Base Map and Initial Site Analysis (not to scale) You may want to make several photocopies of this base map to use for the following steps in the design process. Step 2. Site analysis A thorough site analysis tells you what you have to work NICE VIEW with on the property. Part 1 of the “Home Landscape Questionnaire” (see insert) includes questions that NEED PRIVACY should be answered when completing a site analysis. Lay a piece of tracing paper over the base map and draw the information gathered during the site analysis. This layer should include these features: KITCHEN/ DINING ROOM • Basic drainage patterns
    [Show full text]
  • SUSTAINABLE LANDSCAPE DESIGN at Macomb Community College
    SUSTAINABLE LANDSCAPE DESIGN at Macomb Community College BASIC LANDSCAPE DESIGN CERTIFICATES IN LANDSCAPE DESIGN CERTIFICATE—(6 Classes) • Basic Landscape Design Landscape Design Graphics • Advanced Landscape Design Learn the principles of drafting and plan reading. Different design • Environmental Horticulture styles will be explored and practiced. Learn the required skills and receive state-of-the-art information Landscape Design Principles necessary to develop a solid foundation in the original “Green Explore how design principles and elements of art are applied to Industry.” The Sustainable Landscape Design Program encourages create a functional, sustainable, and aesthetically pleasing outdoor professional standards, a strong work ethic, and sound management extension of indoor living. practices. Your classes will be taught by Rick Lazzell, a Certified Natural The Design & Sales Process Shoreline Professional with over 30 years of experience. Review marketing your services, initial client contact, client interview, design presentation, and portfolio development. If applicable, bring ENVIRONMENTAL HORTICULTURE your site evaluation rendering to the first session. CERTIFICATE—(7 Classes) Residential Landscape Planting Design Learn plant material composition and design characteristics. Basic Horticulture/How Plants Grow Review sustainable landscape design criteria, including selection, Discover how a plant grows, its relationship with the soil, its climate, cultural suitability, availability, costs, and maintenance. water and nutrient
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 the Development of Landscape Architecture
    Revisiting Riverside: A Frederick Law Olmsted Community Chapter 1 The Development of Landscape Architecture Landscape Architecture is a profession that involves human interaction with nature. It entails human impacts upon the land, such as the shaping of landform and the creation of parks, urban spaces, and gardens. Landscape architecture can also include the mitigation of human impacts upon nature. For example, landscape architects are often involved with the restoration of or preservation of areas for wildlife and for the continued success of natural processes (i.e. stormwater collection and purification, groundwater recharge, water quality, the survival of native plants and plant communities, etc.). Landscape architecture is often inspired by social needs. Olmsted’s work was a reaction to the uncleanly, overcrowded conditions of cities in the late nineteenth-century and the need for people to escape from these conditions and restore themselves in a natural setting. This same ethic inspires many of today’s landscape architects who seek to provide safe, inviting parks within cities and to develop housing that responds to the needs of the residents. This housing could be in the form of improved public housing, developed through dialog with residents and informed by the successes and failures of past public housing trends. Landscape Architect’s involvement with planning efforts range from complex and inspired plans such as Riverside in 1868 - 1869, Garden Cities (Radburn, NJ 1928), the Greenbelt town design of the 1930s, and today’s ecologically and culturally sensitive development models, to the typical, ubiquitous, suburban developments that have evolved since the early twentieth century. The scope of landscape architecture ranges from broad projects (town planning and large, national parks) to narrow (small parks, urban plazas, commercial centers and residences).
    [Show full text]
  • Growth by Design
    Report - June 2011 Growth by Design This report details the powerful economic impact of New York's architecture and design sectors. It shows that New York has far more designers than any other U.S. city, but concludes that far more could be done to harness the sector's growth potential. by David Giles This is an excerpt. Click here to read the full report (PDF). Facing the possibility that New York City’s financial services sector will never again reach the job levels of 2007, city economic development officials are moving aggressively to identify ways to grow and diversify the economy. Policymakers have embraced sectors from digital media and biotechnology to clean tech. But thus far little attention has been paid to a part of the economy that has experienced phenomenal growth over the past decade and for which New York holds a significant competitive advantage: design. Though fewer and fewer products are actually made in high-cost cities like New York, the Big Apple has cemented its status as one of the few global hubs for where things are designed. In 2009, the New York metro-region was home to 40,470 designers, which is far and away the largest pool of design talent in the country and among two or three of the largest in the world. In addition, no other American city has strengths in so many design fields—from architecture to fashion design, graphic design, interior design, furniture design and industrial design. Image not readable or empty /images/uploads/Growth_by_Design_-_Info.png The design sector has also been expanding at a rapid clip.
    [Show full text]