DOCSLIB.ORG

C S a S S C C S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
C S a S S C C S C S A S S C C S Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Secrétariat canadien de consultation scientifique Research Document 2010/117 Document de recherche 2010/117 Information in Support of a Recovery L’information a l’appui de l’évaluation Potential Assessment of Atlantic Mud- du potentiel de rétablissement de la piddock (Barnea truncata) in Canada pholade tronquée (Barnea truncata) au Canada Andrew Hebda Nova Scotia Museum of Natural History 1747 Summer Street Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 3A6 This series documents the scientific basis for the La présente série documente les fondements evaluation of aquatic resources and ecosystems in scientifiques des évaluations des ressources et Canada. As such, it addresses the issues of the des écosystèmes aquatiques du Canada. Elle day in the time frames required and the traite des problèmes courants selon les documents it contains are not intended as échéanciers dictés. Les documents qu’elle definitive statements on the subjects addressed contient ne doivent pas être considérés comme but rather as progress reports on ongoing des énoncés définitifs sur les sujets traités, mais investigations. plutôt comme des rapports d’étape sur les études en cours. Research documents are produced in the official Les documents de recherche sont publiés dans language in which they are provided to the la langue officielle utilisée dans le manuscrit Secretariat. envoyé au Secrétariat. This document is available on the Internet at: Ce document est disponible sur l’Internet à: http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas/ ISSN 1499-3848 (Printed / Imprimé) ISSN 1919-5044 (Online / En ligne) © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2011 © Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 2011 Maritimes Region Assessment of Atlantic Mud-piddock in Canada TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT / RÉSUMÉ.............................................................................................................. v SPECIES SUMMARY................................................................................................................. 1 BACKGROUND.......................................................................................................................... 1 TAXONOMY ............................................................................................................................... 2 DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................................... 2 BASIC BIOLOGY ....................................................................................................................... 5 Food and Feeding ................................................................................................................. 7 Salinity Tolerance .................................................................................................................. 7 Dispersal................................................................................................................................ 8 Habitat Requirements............................................................................................................10 STATUS AND TRENDS .............................................................................................................12 Distribution – Range ..............................................................................................................12 North-Eastern United States ............................................................................................13 Canadian Distribution.......................................................................................................13 Abundance ............................................................................................................................14 Recent Trajectory for Species Abundance and Range .........................................................17 Recent Life History Parameters.............................................................................................17 Natural Mortality ...............................................................................................................17 Recruitment......................................................................................................................19 HABITAT CONSIDERATIONS...................................................................................................19 Adults.....................................................................................................................................19 Water................................................................................................................................19 Substrate..........................................................................................................................20 Larvae....................................................................................................................................20 Water................................................................................................................................20 Substrate..........................................................................................................................20 Spatial Extent of Areas that are Likely to have These Properties .........................................20 Spatial Constraints ................................................................................................................21 Supply of Habitat Meeting Demands .....................................................................................21 Habitat Allocation Options .....................................................................................................21 RESIDENCE REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................................21 THREATS ...................................................................................................................................21 Temperature Change ............................................................................................................22 Ice Movement in Late Winter.................................................................................................22 Increased Frequency and Severity of Storm Events .............................................................22 Installation of Water Control Structures or In-Stream Generators.........................................22 Mining of Minerals in River and Basin Sediments .................................................................22 Surficial Drainage from Adjoining Watersheds ......................................................................23 Excavation of Salt Domes for Liquified Gas Storage.............................................................23 Bulk Petroleum Movement in the Gulf of Maine ....................................................................23 iii Maritimes Region Assessment of Atlantic Mud-piddock in Canada RECOVERY OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................23 RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS REQUIRED................................................................................24 CONCLUSIONS .........................................................................................................................24 REFERENCES CITED................................................................................................................24 TABLES......................................................................................................................................28 iv Maritimes Region Assessment of Atlantic Mud-piddock in Canada Correct citation for this publication: Hebda, A. 2011. Information in Support of a Recovery Potential Assessment of Atlantic Mud- piddock (Barnea truncata) in Canada. DFO Can. Sci. Advis. Sec. Res. Doc. 2010/117: vi + 30 p. ABSTRACT The Atlantic Mud-piddock (Barnea truncata) was listed as Threatened by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) in November, 2009. The designation was due to its’ small, disjunct Canadian distribution, entirely dependent on a single geological formation, the red-mudstone facies within the Minas Basin, Nova Scotia. This document provides the information and scientific advice required to meet the various requirements of the Species at Risk Act (SARA), such as deciding whether or not to add the Atlantic Mud-piddock to Schedule 1 under SARA, developing a Recovery Strategy if it is listed, and informing decisions on authorization to carry out activities that would otherwise violate the SARA provisions. This Research Document describes the current state of knowledge of the biology, distribution, ecology, habitat requirement and threats to the Atlantic Mud-piddock. It outlines the protection under current legislation, and what additional protection would be afforded if listed under SARA. RÉSUMÉ La pholade tronquée (Barnea truncata) a été évaluée en novembre 2009 par le Comité sur la situation des espèces en péril au Canada (COSEPAC) comme étant une espèce menacée. Cette décision était fondée sur le fait qu’il n’existe au Canada qu’une petite population isolée de cette espèce vivant exclusivement sur un seul type de formation géologique, soit les mudstones rouges du bassin Minas, en Nouvelle-Écosse. Le présent document contient l’information et l’avis scientifique nécessaires pour satisfaire aux diverses exigences de la Loi sur les espèces en péril (LEP), par exemple pour déterminer s’il convient
Load more

Recommended publications
  • First Record of Atlantic Mud Piddock, Barnea (Anchomasa) Truncata (Bivalvia, Pholadidae) in Argentina
    Aquatic Invasions (2012) Volume 7, Issue 2: 283–286 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/ai.2012.7.2.015 Open Access © 2012 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2012 REABIC Short Communication First record of Atlantic mud piddock, Barnea (Anchomasa) truncata (Bivalvia, Pholadidae) in Argentina Sandra M. Fiori1,2*, Pía Simonetti1 and Eder P. Dos Santos1 1 Instituto Argentino de Oceanografía, P.O. Box 804 (8000) Bahía Blanca, Argentina 2 Departamento de Biología, Bioquímica y Farmacia, Universidad Nacional del Sur, San Juan 670 (8000) Bahía Blanca, Argentina E-mail: [email protected] (SMF), [email protected] (PS), [email protected] (EPDS) *Corresponding author Received: 29 August 2011 / Accepted: 30 December 2011 / Published online: 28 January 2012 Abstract The present work reports the finding of an exotic bivalve, Barnea (Anchomasa) truncata, in the intertidal zone of the Bahía Blanca Estuary Argentina (38º Lat S), more than 2000 km south from the edge of its native range in South America (21º Lat S, Brazil). Lines of evidence suggest that larval transport by shipping is the probable entry route of this species. The most apparent modification created by the introduction of this species is the generation of greater complexity and habitat heterogeneity in the mud tidal plain of the estuary; the consequent effects on the local biota should therefore be evaluated. Key words: Pholadidae, non-indigenous bivalve, Bahía Blanca estuary, South America Introduction Two species belonging to this group commonly occur on the American Atlantic The introduction of exotic species is considered coasts: Barnea (Anchomasa) truncata (Say, one of the main threats to biodiversity at 1822) and Barnea (Anchomasa) lamellosa different scales and extent (IUCN 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Mollusca, Pholadidae, Xylophagainae)
    Turner: Xylopholas altenai 97 n. gen. n. sp. A new genus and species of deep water wood-boring bivalve (Mollusca, Pholadidae, Xylophagainae) by Ruth+D. Turner Museum ofComparativeZoology, Harvard University, Cambridge,Mass., U.S.A. The Xylophagainae are marine wood-boring bivalves which are confined than 150 largely to depths greater meters. They are not found the intertidal the sublittoral in zone, occur in only in higher latitudes, and are the sole wood-borers in depths over 200 meters. The greatest known depth for the invasion oftest wood by Teredini- dae is 200 meters (Tipper, 1968). The known depth range for the Xylophagainae extends from two meters below low tide in Millport, Scotland, to 7290 meters in the Banda Trench, off Ceram. Only occasionally are they found in drift wood, and this is usually after storms, the water logged wood having been lifted offthe bottom and carried ashore by strong waves. The discovery of the new genus and species described here is the result of a world-wide study of the Xylophagainae, a subfamily of the Pholadidae characterized by teredinid-like shells and a small, divided mesoplax. They lack apophyses (as do the Jouannetiinae) and do not produce a callum in the adult stage (as in the Phola- in dinae). They are unique among the Pholadidae having a wood- storing caecum. The author is grateful to Dr. Frederick Bayer, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Miami, Dr. J0r- gen Knudsen, Universitetets Zoologiske Museum, Copenhagen, Den- mark, and Dr. W. Adam, Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Brussels, Belgium, for the loan of specimens and the opportunity to remove specimens from dredged wood or other plant material in their collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Differentiating Successful and Failed Molluscan Invaders in Estuarine Ecosystems
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 332: 41–51, 2007 Published March 5 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Differentiating successful and failed molluscan invaders in estuarine ecosystems A. Whitman Miller1,*, Gregory M. Ruiz1, Mark S. Minton1, Richard F. Ambrose2 1Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, PO Box 28, Edgewater, Maryland 21037, USA 2Environmental Science and Engineering Program, Box 951772, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA ABSTRACT: Despite mounting evidence of invasive species’ impacts on the environment and society, our ability to predict invasion establishment, spread, and impact are inadequate. Efforts to explain and predict invasion outcomes have been limited primarily to terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems. Invasions are also common in coastal marine ecosystems, yet to date predictive marine invasion mod- els are absent. Here we present a model based on biological attributes associated with invasion suc- cess (establishment) of marine molluscs that compares successful and failed invasions from a group of 93 species introduced to San Francisco Bay (SFB) in association with commercial oyster transfers from eastern North America (ca. 1869 to 1940). A multiple logistic regression model correctly classi- fied 83% of successful and 80% of failed invaders according to their source region abundance at the time of oyster transfers, tolerance of low salinity, and developmental mode. We tested the generality of the SFB invasion model by applying it to 3 coastal locations (2 in North America and 1 in Europe) that received oyster transfers from the same source and during the same time as SFB. The model cor- rectly predicted 100, 75, and 86% of successful invaders in these locations, indicating that abun- dance, environmental tolerance (ability to withstand low salinity), and developmental mode not only explain patterns of invasion success in SFB, but more importantly, predict invasion success in geo- graphically disparate marine ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY Department of Biological Sciences
    OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY Department of Biological Sciences College of Sciences Norfolk, VA 23529-0456 DEVELOPMENT OF DIAGNOSTIC APPROACHES TO DETERMINE SOURCES OF ANTHROPOGENIC STRESS AFFECTING BENTHIC COMMUNITY CONDITION IN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY Final Report Prepared by Principal Investigators: Daniel M. Dauer 1 Michael F. Lane 1 Roberto J. Llansó 2 1 - Department of Biological Sciences Old Dominion University Norfolk, VA 23529-0456 2 - Versar, Inc. 9200 Rumsey Road Columbia, MD 21045 Submitted to: U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office 410 Severn Avenue, Suite 109 Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Attn: Ms. Kelly Shenk April 30, 2002 OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY Department of Biological Sciences College of Sciences Norfolk, VA 23529-0456 DEVELOPMENT OF DIAGNOSTIC APPROACHES TO DETERMINE SOURCES OF ANTHROPOGENIC STRESS AFFECTING BENTHIC COMMUNITY CONDITION IN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY Final Report Prepared by Principal Investigators: Daniel M. Dauer 1 Michael F. Lane 1 Roberto J. Llansó 2 1 - Department of Biological Sciences Old Dominion University Norfolk, VA 23529-0456 2 - Versar, Inc. 9200 Rumsey Road Columbia, MD 21045 Submitted to: U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office 410 Severn Avenue, Suite 109 Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Attn: Ms. Kelly Shenk April 30, 2002 Table of Contents List of Figures ............................................................... ii List of Tables ............................................................... iii List of Appendices ............................................................v I. Introduction ...........................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Boring Bivalve Mollusks from Isla Margarita, Venezuela
    ISSN 0738-9388 247 Volume: 49 THE FESTIVUS ISSUE 3 Marine boring bivalve mollusks from Isla Margarita, Venezuela Marcel Velásquez 1 1 Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Sorbonne Universites, 43 Rue Cuvier, F-75231 Paris, France; [email protected] Paul Valentich-Scott 2 2 Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, California, 93105, USA; [email protected] Juan Carlos Capelo 3 3 Estación de Investigaciones Marinas de Margarita. Fundación La Salle de Ciencias Naturales. Apartado 144 Porlama,. Isla de Margarita, Venezuela. ABSTRACT Marine endolithic and wood-boring bivalve mollusks living in rocks, corals, wood, and shells were surveyed on the Caribbean coast of Venezuela at Isla Margarita between 2004 and 2008. These surveys were supplemented with boring mollusk data from malacological collections in Venezuelan museums. A total of 571 individuals, corresponding to 3 orders, 4 families, 15 genera, and 20 species were identified and analyzed. The species with the widest distribution were: Leiosolenus aristatus which was found in 14 of the 24 localities, followed by Leiosolenus bisulcatus and Choristodon robustus, found in eight and six localities, respectively. The remaining species had low densities in the region, being collected in only one to four of the localities sampled. The total number of species reported here represents 68% of the boring mollusks that have been documented in Venezuelan coastal waters. This study represents the first work focused exclusively on the examination of the cryptofaunal mollusks of Isla Margarita, Venezuela. KEY WORDS Shipworms, cryptofauna, Teredinidae, Pholadidae, Gastrochaenidae, Mytilidae, Petricolidae, Margarita Island, Isla Margarita Venezuela, boring bivalves, endolithic. INTRODUCTION The lithophagans (Mytilidae) are among the Bivalve mollusks from a range of families have more recognized boring mollusks.
    [Show full text]
  • TREATISE ONLINE Number 48
    TREATISE ONLINE Number 48 Part N, Revised, Volume 1, Chapter 31: Illustrated Glossary of the Bivalvia Joseph G. Carter, Peter J. Harries, Nikolaus Malchus, André F. Sartori, Laurie C. Anderson, Rüdiger Bieler, Arthur E. Bogan, Eugene V. Coan, John C. W. Cope, Simon M. Cragg, José R. García-March, Jørgen Hylleberg, Patricia Kelley, Karl Kleemann, Jiří Kříž, Christopher McRoberts, Paula M. Mikkelsen, John Pojeta, Jr., Peter W. Skelton, Ilya Tëmkin, Thomas Yancey, and Alexandra Zieritz 2012 Lawrence, Kansas, USA ISSN 2153-4012 (online) paleo.ku.edu/treatiseonline PART N, REVISED, VOLUME 1, CHAPTER 31: ILLUSTRATED GLOSSARY OF THE BIVALVIA JOSEPH G. CARTER,1 PETER J. HARRIES,2 NIKOLAUS MALCHUS,3 ANDRÉ F. SARTORI,4 LAURIE C. ANDERSON,5 RÜDIGER BIELER,6 ARTHUR E. BOGAN,7 EUGENE V. COAN,8 JOHN C. W. COPE,9 SIMON M. CRAgg,10 JOSÉ R. GARCÍA-MARCH,11 JØRGEN HYLLEBERG,12 PATRICIA KELLEY,13 KARL KLEEMAnn,14 JIřÍ KřÍž,15 CHRISTOPHER MCROBERTS,16 PAULA M. MIKKELSEN,17 JOHN POJETA, JR.,18 PETER W. SKELTON,19 ILYA TËMKIN,20 THOMAS YAncEY,21 and ALEXANDRA ZIERITZ22 [1University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA, [email protected]; 2University of South Florida, Tampa, USA, [email protected], [email protected]; 3Institut Català de Paleontologia (ICP), Catalunya, Spain, [email protected], [email protected]; 4Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, USA, [email protected]; 5South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, [email protected]; 6Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, USA, [email protected]; 7North
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Keys Species List
    FKNMS Species List A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T 1 Marine and Terrestrial Species of the Florida Keys 2 Phylum Subphylum Class Subclass Order Suborder Infraorder Superfamily Family Scientific Name Common Name Notes 3 1 Porifera (Sponges) Demospongia Dictyoceratida Spongiidae Euryspongia rosea species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey 4 2 Fasciospongia cerebriformis species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey 5 3 Hippospongia gossypina Velvet sponge 6 4 Hippospongia lachne Sheepswool sponge 7 5 Oligoceras violacea Tortugas survey, Wheaton list 8 6 Spongia barbara Yellow sponge 9 7 Spongia graminea Glove sponge 10 8 Spongia obscura Grass sponge 11 9 Spongia sterea Wire sponge 12 10 Irciniidae Ircinia campana Vase sponge 13 11 Ircinia felix Stinker sponge 14 12 Ircinia cf. Ramosa species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey 15 13 Ircinia strobilina Black-ball sponge 16 14 Smenospongia aurea species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey, Tortugas survey, Wheaton list 17 15 Thorecta horridus recorded from Keys by Wiedenmayer 18 16 Dendroceratida Dysideidae Dysidea etheria species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey; Tortugas survey, Wheaton list 19 17 Dysidea fragilis species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey; Tortugas survey, Wheaton list 20 18 Dysidea janiae species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey; Tortugas survey, Wheaton list 21 19 Dysidea variabilis species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey 22 20 Verongida Druinellidae Pseudoceratina crassa Branching tube sponge 23 21 Aplysinidae Aplysina archeri species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey 24 22 Aplysina cauliformis Row pore rope sponge 25 23 Aplysina fistularis Yellow tube sponge 26 24 Aplysina lacunosa 27 25 Verongula rigida Pitted sponge 28 26 Darwinellidae Aplysilla sulfurea species from G.P.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Northwest Florida Species List
    NORTHWEST FLORIDA SPECIES LIST This list, which contains shells found in the onshore and offshore waters of the Florida Panhandle, was prepared by the members of the Gulf Coast Shell Club. The list is arranged alphabetically by family. The numbers to the left of the shell name refer to the corresponding species as found in American Seashells, Second Edition by Dr R. Tucker Abbott. An asterisk indicates that a name change to the family, species, genus, (or all) has occurred since publication. Shells annotated with a superscript 1 indicate form names that may or may not be valid but are useful for identification. Shells annotated with a superscript 2 are shells from the 1994 Keeler and Robertson survey of the Apalachicola Marine Estuary and immediate offshore areas and represent species not currently held by GCSC members but that are deemed native to our area. Common name for the shell and its normal adult size range columns are included. There are 635 shells (including forms) on this list as of the latest update in March, 2013. Our thanks go to Dr. Harry Lee of the Jacksonville Shell Club for his assistance in this compilation. A caution: Any list of this type is subject to frequent name changes as the science involved progresses. GASTROPODA Family/Genus/Species Common Name Size (mm) ACTEONIDAE 3888 Acteon candens Rehder, 1939 Rehder’s Baby Bubble 5-10 3887 Acteon (Rictaxis) punctostriatus (C B Adams, 1840)* Pitted Baby Bubble 3-8 APLYSIIDAE (Nudibranch) Aplysia fasciata Poiret, 1789 Mottled Sea Hare 50 4166 Aplysia dactylomela Rang, 1828 Spotted Sea Hare 100-125 ARCHITECTICIDAE 0938 Architectonica nobilis Roding, 1798 Common Sundial 20-64 0943 Psilaxis krebsii (Morch, 1875) Beaded Sundial 7-13 BUCCINIDAE 2425 Antillophos candeanus (d’Orbigny, 1842)* Beaded Phos 12-30 2398 Engina cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Invertebrate Paleontology Earth Sciences Division Natural History
    Invertebrate Paleontology 19^ Earth Sciences Division Natural History Mu 3311m A NEW SPECIES OF CHIMNEY-BUILDING PENITELLA FROM THE GULF OF ALASKA (BIVALVIA: PHOLADIDAE) * LIBRARY 'Ol ANGBIES GOIJNTV \i: A>., , -APOsrr.'ON GEORGE L. KENNEDY AND JOHN M. ARMENTROUT 1 Made in United States of America Reprinted from THE VELIGER Vol. 32, No. 3, July 1989 © California Malacozoological Society, Inc., 1989 THE VELIGER © CMS, Inc., 1989 The Veliger 32(3):320-325 (July 3, 1989) A New Species of Chimney-Building Penitella from the Gulf of Alaska (Bivalvia: Pholadidae) by GEORGE L. KENNEDY Invertebrate Paleontology Section, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90007, USA AND JOHN M. ARMENTROUT Mobil Oil Corporation, New Exploration Ventures, P.O. Box 650232, Dallas, Texas 75265, USA Abstract. Penitella hopkinsi sp. nov., from the Gulf of Alaska, differs from other species in the genus by its blunt and thickened posterior margin that inserts against the base of a chimney of agglutinated sediment (unique in the genus), by the shape of the mesoplax, and by details of the umbonal reflection and dorsal extension of the callum. Anatomy is unknown. Late Pleistocene records of the species range from the Seward Peninsula, Alaska, to Point Arena, California. INTRODUCTION acology]); MCZ, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cam- bridge; NMC, National Museum of Natural Sciences, Recent efforts to identify several enigmatic species of Peni- Ottawa; NSMT, National Science Museum, Tokyo; tella Valenciennes, 1846, from both the northeastern and SBMNH, Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, northwestern Pacific revealed that a number of nomencla- Santa Barbara; UCLA, University of California, Los An- tural and taxonomic problems in the genus still need to geles (collections at LACM); UCMP, University of Cal- be resolved (KENNEDY, 1985).
    [Show full text]
  • Llista Vermella Dels Invertebrats Marins Del Mar Balear 2016
    LLISTA VERMELLA DELS INVERTEBRATS MARINS DEL MAR BALEAR 2016 Elvira Álvarez LLISTA VERMELLA DELS INVERTEBRATS MARINS DEL MAR BALEAR Elvira Álvarez 2016 Llista vermella dels invertebrats marins del mar Balear Autors L'elaboració de la LLISTA VERMELLA D'INVERTEBRATS MARINS DEL MAR BALEAR ha estat un projecte del Servei de Protecció d'Espècies de la Conselleria de Medi Ambient, Agricultura i Pesca. Redacció i coordinació: Elvira Álvarez. Recopilació bibliogràfica: Elvira Álvarez i Margalida Cerdà. Col·laboradors Per a l'elaboració de les fitxes s'ha comptat amb la col·laboració dels principals investigadors dels invertebrats marins, que han participat desinteressadament aportant experiència de recerca, coneixements de camp, etc. Tota aquesta valuosa informació ha permès en molts de casos avaluar l'estat de conservació de les espècies d'una manera rigorosa amb les dades de què es disposava. PORIFERA ARTHROPODA subfílum CRUSTACEA Enric Ballesteros Alfonso Ramos Alfonso Ramos Enric Ballesteros CNIDARIA Lluc Garcia Enric Ballesteros David Díaz Cristina Linares Raquel Goñi Diego Kersting Sandra Mallol Covadonga Orejas BRYOZOA Ricardo Aguilar Enric Ballesteros MOLLUSCA Alfonso Ramos Enric Ballesteros CHORDATA Alfonso Ramos Alfonso Ramos Maite Vázquez EQUINODERMATA Davíd Díaz Joan Oliver Alfonso Ramos Enric Ballesteros Fotografies: totes les fotografies que apareixen en aquest treball han estat cedides pels autors, són propietat de la Conselleria de Medi Ambient, Agricultura i Pesca o s'han obtingut d'informes tècnics publicats o de pàgines web amb llicència d'ús lliure. En tots els casos s'ha especificat l'autor, l’informe o la pàgina web. Agraïments: aquest treball no hauria estat possible sense la col·laboració de tots aquests retllevants investigadors en invertebrats marins de tot l'Estat.
    [Show full text]
  • Hermit Crabs - Paguridae and Diogenidae
    Identification Guide to Marine Invertebrates of Texas by Brenda Bowling Texas Parks and Wildlife Department April 12, 2019 Version 4 Page 1 Marine Crabs of Texas Mole crab Yellow box crab Giant hermit Surf hermit Lepidopa benedicti Calappa sulcata Petrochirus diogenes Isocheles wurdemanni Family Albuneidae Family Calappidae Family Diogenidae Family Diogenidae Blue-spot hermit Thinstripe hermit Blue land crab Flecked box crab Paguristes hummi Clibanarius vittatus Cardisoma guanhumi Hepatus pudibundus Family Diogenidae Family Diogenidae Family Gecarcinidae Family Hepatidae Calico box crab Puerto Rican sand crab False arrow crab Pink purse crab Hepatus epheliticus Emerita portoricensis Metoporhaphis calcarata Persephona crinita Family Hepatidae Family Hippidae Family Inachidae Family Leucosiidae Mottled purse crab Stone crab Red-jointed fiddler crab Atlantic ghost crab Persephona mediterranea Menippe adina Uca minax Ocypode quadrata Family Leucosiidae Family Menippidae Family Ocypodidae Family Ocypodidae Mudflat fiddler crab Spined fiddler crab Longwrist hermit Flatclaw hermit Uca rapax Uca spinicarpa Pagurus longicarpus Pagurus pollicaris Family Ocypodidae Family Ocypodidae Family Paguridae Family Paguridae Dimpled hermit Brown banded hermit Flatback mud crab Estuarine mud crab Pagurus impressus Pagurus annulipes Eurypanopeus depressus Rithropanopeus harrisii Family Paguridae Family Paguridae Family Panopeidae Family Panopeidae Page 2 Smooth mud crab Gulf grassflat crab Oystershell mud crab Saltmarsh mud crab Hexapanopeus angustifrons Dyspanopeus
    [Show full text]
  • Natura Impact Statement for the Short-Term Deployment of a Tidal Energy Test Device in the Fergus Estuary
    Natura Impact Statement for the Short-term Deployment of a Tidal Energy Test Device in the Fergus Estuary Produced by AQUAFACT International Services Ltd On behalf of DesignPro Ltd. April 2018 AQUAFACT INTERNATIONAL SERVICES LTD., 12 KILKERRIN PARK, LIOSBAUN, TUAM ROAD, GALWAY H91 FW7V www.aquafact.ie [email protected] tel +353 (0) 91 756812 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Requirement for an Article 6 Assessment ............................................................................................ 1 1.2. The Aim of this Report ........................................................................................................................ 2 1.3. Consultation ...................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Appropriate Assessment Process 3 2.1. Legislative Context ............................................................................................................................. 3 2.2. Stages of AA ....................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2.1. Stage 1. Screening for Appropriate Assessment ................................................................................ 5 2.2.2. Stage 2. Appropriate Assessment (NIS) ............................................................................................. 5 2.2.3. Stage 3. Alternative Solutions .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]