DOCSLIB.ORG

Falls City Transportation System Plan (2013) F a L L S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Falls City Transportation System Plan (2013) F a L L S Falls City Transportation System Plan (2013) F a l l s C i t y , O r e g o n Prepared For: The City of Falls City Oregon Department of Land Oregon Department of 299 Mill Street Conservation and Development Transportation, Region 2 Falls City, Oregon 97344 635 Capitol Street NE, Suite 150 455 Airport Road SE (503) 787‐3631 Salem, Oregon 97301‐2540 Salem, Oregon 97301 (503) 373‐0050 (503) 852‐7575 Prepared By: Mid­Willamette Council of Governments Kittelson & Associates, Inc. (KAI) 100 High Street SE, Suite 200 610 SW Alder, Suite 700 Salem, Oregon 97301 Portland, OR 97205 (503) 588‐6177 (503) 228‐5230 Project Principal: Matt Hughart, P.E. Project No. 11988 This project is partially funded by a grant from the Transportation and Growth Management (TGM) Program, a joint program of the Oregon Department of Transportation and the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development. This TGM grant is financed, in part, by federal Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA‐LU), local government, and the State of Oregon funds. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect views or policies of the State of Oregon. July 2013 Acknowledgments The following people are acknowledged for their contributions to the development of this Transportation System Plan: Technical Advisory Committee Julee Bishop, City Councilor, City of Falls City Rich Bontrager, Black Rock Mt. Bike Association Dan Fricke, Oregon Department of Transportation John Gilbert, Falls City School District/Falls City Fire District Amy Houghtaling, Mayor, City of Falls City Matt Hughart, Kittleson & Associates Inc. Henry Hughes, City Councilor, City of Falls City Guy Mack, City of Falls City Public Works Committee Scott E. Marlega, Weyerhaeuser Marjorie Mattson, Mid‐Willamette Valley Council of Governments Mike McConnell, City of Falls City Public Works Committee Austin McGuigan, Polk County Ed Miller, Luckiamute Watershed Council Michael Morales, Falls City Resident Don Poe, City of Falls City Janet Runkle, Forest Capital Partners LLC Nancy Taylor, Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife John Volkman, Falls City Businesses Representative James Walton, City of Falls City Todd Whitaker, Polk County Naomi Zwerdling, Oregon Department of Transportation Angela Lazarean, DLCD City of Falls City City Council Amy Houghtaling, Mayor Julee Bishop Erma Ferguson Henry Hughes Lori Jean Sickles Barbara Spencer John Volkmann City of Falls City Staff Amber Mathiesen, City Administrator Domenica Protheroe, City Clerk John McGee, City Engineer James Walton, Public Works Director Table of Contents SECTION 1 Pg. Chapter 1 Background and Introduction ................................................................................................. 1‐1 Chapter 2 Existing and Future Conditions ............................................................................................... 2‐1 Chapter 3 Transportation System Alternatives ....................................................................................... 3‐1 Chapter 4 Recommended Transportation Improvements ...................................................................... 4‐1 Chapter 5 Transportation Financing Program ......................................................................................... 5‐1 SECTION 2 Pg. Appendix A Transportation System Inventory 2012 ................................................................................ A‐1 Appendix B Review of Existing Plans, Policies, Standards, and Laws and Assessment of the Falls City B‐1 TSP 2013................................................................................................................................ Appendix C Traffic Count Worksheets ..................................................................................................... C‐1 Appendix D Methodology Memorandum ................................................................................................ D‐1 Appendix E 2011 Existing Conditions Traffic Analysis Worksheets .......................................................... E‐1 Appendix F ODOT Crash Data .................................................................................................................. F‐1 Appendix G Critical Crash Data ................................................................................................................. G‐1 Appendix H 2036 No‐Build Conditions Traffic Analysis Worksheets ........................................................ H‐1 Appendix I Community Survey Workshop #1 Feedback Summary and Survey Forms ........................... I‐1 Appendix J Transportation Utility Formation Study Report ................................................................... J‐1 List of Tables Pg. Table 2­1 Roadway Ownership and Functional Classification ............................................................. 2‐3 Table 2­2 2013 Falls City Street Design Standards .............................................................................. 2‐5 Table 2­3 Crash Analysis Summary (2006‐2010) ................................................................................. 2‐11 Table 2­4 Intersection Crash Type and Severity (2006‐2010) ............................................................. 2‐12 Table 2­5 Housing Growth Projections (2011‐2036) ........................................................................... 2‐13 Table 2­6 2036 Single‐Family Housing Trip Generation Estimates by Growth Area, Weekday AM and PM Peak Hour ............................................................................................................... 2‐14 Table 2­7 Past Transportation Project Funding in Falls City ................................................................ 2‐20 Table 2­8 Future Transportation Project Funding ............................................................................... 2‐20 Table 3­1 N. Main Street/Bridge Street/Mitchell Street Improvement Concept Cost Estimates ....... 3‐6 Table 3­2 Pedestrian Improvement Cost Estimates ............................................................................ 3‐11 Table 4­1 Transportation Improvement Projects ................................................................................ 4‐4, 4‐5 Table 4­2 Planning Level Transportation Improvement Costs (Identified List) ................................... 4‐5 Table 4­3 Proposed Falls City Street Design Standards ....................................................................... 4‐9 Table 5­1 Forecast Future Transportation Funding ............................................................................. 5‐2 Table 5­2 Planning Level Transportation Improvement Costs (Identified List) ................................... 5‐2 Table 5­3 Existing and Potential Transportation Funding Sources ...................................................... 5‐3 List of Maps and Figures Pg. Map 1­1 Falls City Comprehensive Plan Designations (2013) 1‐7 Map 1­2 Falls City Address Map (and including Zone Districts (2013)) ............................................. 1‐8 Figure 2­1 Street Plan ........................................................................................................................... 2‐4 Figure 2­2 Study Intersection Locations ............................................................................................... 2‐6 Figure 2­3 2012 Traffic Conditions ....................................................................................................... 2‐7 Figure 2­4 Daily Traffic Profiles ............................................................................................................ 2‐9, 2‐10 Figure 2­5 Future Traffic Conditions ..................................................................................................... 2‐15 Figure 2­6 2012 Sidewalk Network ...................................................................................................... 2‐17 Figure 3­1 N. Main Street/Bridge Street/Mitchell Street Option #1 .................................................... 3‐3 Figure 3­2 N. Main Street/Bridge Street/Mitchell Street Option #2 .................................................... 3‐4 Figure 3­3 N. Main Street/Bridge Street/Mitchell Street Option #3 .................................................... 3‐5 Figure 3­4 Street Plan ........................................................................................................................... 3‐7 Figure 3­5 Revised Street Design Standards ......................................................................................... 3‐10 Figure 4­1 Future Transportation Improvements ................................................................................ 4‐3 Figure 4­2 N. Main Street/Bridge Street/Mitchell Street Improvement Project .................................. 4‐6 Figure 4­3 Street Plan ........................................................................................................................... 4‐8 Figure 4­4 Street Design Configurations ............................................................................................... 4‐10 Section 1 Chapter 1 Background and Introduction Falls City TSP – Chapter 1 2013 Section 1 – Chapter 1 Background and Introduction The Falls City Transportation System Plan (TSP) establishes City goals, policies, and strategies for developing and improving the transportation system within the Falls City Urban Growth Boundary. The Falls City TSP serves as a twenty‐year plan to guide transportation improvements
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In Partial Fulfillment Of
    WATER UTILI AT'ION AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE 11ILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN by CAST" IR OLISZE "SKI A THESIS submitted to OREGON STATE COLLEGE in partialfulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE June 1954 School Graduate Committee Data thesis is presented_____________ Typed by Kate D. Humeston TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. INTRODUCTION Statement and History of the Problem........ 1 Historical Data............................. 3 Procedure Used to Explore the Data.......... 4 Organization of the Data.................... 8 II. THE WILLAMETTE RIVER WATERSHED Orientation................................. 10 Orography................................... 10 Geology................................. 11 Soil Types................................. 19 Climate ..................................... 20 Precipitation..*.,,,,,,,................... 21 Storms............'......................... 26 Physical Characteristics of the River....... 31 Physical Characteristics of the Major Tributaries............................ 32 Surface Water Supply ........................ 33 Run-off Characteristics..................... 38 Discharge Records........ 38 Ground Water Supply......................... 39 CHAPTER PAGE III. ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL UTILIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT.. .... .................... 44 Flood Characteristics ........................ 44 Flood History......... ....................... 45 Provisional Standard Project: Flood......... 45 Flood Plain......... ........................ 47 Flood Control................................ 48 Drainage............
    [Show full text]
  • Willamette River Basin Above the Luckiamute River
    312 123o 30' 121o 45' 44o 45' 14174000 Albany BENTON Corvallis Philomath WILLAMETTE 14171000 Monroe Smith 14158500 LINN 14158790 14170000 River Harrisburg R RIVER 14158795 14166000 Blue 14158850 River 14161500 Rainbow Belknap Springs Vida Tom River Blue 14169000 Alvador 14163150 River 14159500 14165000 Leaburg 14162500 14162200 Noti Middle McKenzieWalterville Long 14159110 Elmira Eugene 14164700 14163900 South 14166500 14152000 14159200 Goshen Fall 14151000 Fal l Cr 14157500 Jasper Creek Fork 14150000 14150800 Fork Dexter Lowell Fork Coast Cottage 14155500 Grove 14148000 14154500 Oakridge 14153500 Row Dorena 14145500 River Willamette 43o 30' River 0 10 20 30 MILES 0 10 20 30 KILOMETERS EXPLANATION 14158795 Stream-gaging station OREGON 14162400 Water-quality data collection site 14166000 Stream-gaging station and water-quality data collection site Figure 21. Location of surface-water and water-quality stations in the Willamette River Basin upstream from the Luckiamute River. 313 COAST See Figure 23. WILLAMETTE RIVER FORK 14152000 RM 195.0 North Fork 14151000 Fall Creek RM 6.1 Lake Fall Creek RM Fall 198.3 Creek 14150800 Completed RM 4.4 1965 Winberry Creek 14150000 RM 201.2 Lookout Point Lake Completed 1954 14148000 RM 220.2 RM North Fork of Middle Fork Willamette River 224.4 RM Salmon Creek 229.4 RM Salt Creek 231.0 14145500 RM 231.4 EXPLANATION Hills Creek Lake 14152000 Stream-gaging station 14152000 Completed Stream-gaging station and water-quality 1961 data collection site RM 201.2 River mile Stream—Arrow shows direction of flow Windfall RM Creek 240.6 MIDDLE FORK WILLAMETTE RIVER Figure 22. Schematic diagram showing gaging stations in the Middle Fork Willamette River Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Polk County Water Providers Regional Water Supply Strategy Table of Contents
    Regional Water Supply Strategy Final Report January 2005 Presented to: Polk County W ater Providers Prepared by: 111 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 1670 Portland, regon 97204 (503) 223-3033 Acknowledgments The individuals listed below volunteered there time and knowledge to aid in the development of this document. The Polk County Community Development Department thanks the members of the Technical Advisory Committee, Agency Participants, and County Commissioners for their efforts. POLK COUNTY TECHNCIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Committee Members Ralph Blanchard, Chair, Tanglewood Area Ray Hobson, Vice Chair, Perrydale Water Howard Pope, Luckiamute Water and interested public Jay Lugenbill, Rickreall Water Mel Wheeler, Rock Creek Water Karl Ekstrom, Grand Ronde Water Gary Wilson, Monmouth Russ Cooper, Monmouth Fred Braun, Dallas Mike Danko, Independence Jim Minard, City of Adair Village Eric Scott, Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Mark Lyons, Buell-Red Prairie Water Ginger Lindekugel, Falls City Other Agency participants Bill Fujii, Water Resources Department Jackie Hastings and Jill Elliott, Polk Soil and Water Conservation District Deborah Topp, Rickreall Watershed Council Jeff Hecksel, City Manager, Monmouth Greg Ellis, City Manager, Independence Roger Jordan, City Manager, Dallas Polk County Commissioners Mike Propes Phil Walker Tom Ritchey Ron Dodge Prepared by HDR/EES Randy Goff Wade Hathhorn, Ph.D., P.E. Ryan Beaver, P.E. Donna Strahm Betsy Leatham Acknowledgements i Polk County Water Providers Regional Water Supply Strategy Table of Contents
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution and Relative Abundance of Spawning and Larval Pacific Lamprey in the Willamette River Basin
    The distribution and relative abundance of spawning and larval Pacific lamprey in the Willamette River Basin Final Report to the Columbia Inter-Tribal Fish Commission for project years 2011-2014 May 2014 Prepared by Luke Schultz1* Mariah P. Mayfield1, 2 Gabriel T. Sheoships1 Lance A. Wyss3 Benjamin J. Clemens4 Brandon Chasco5 and Carl B. Schreck6 (P.I.) CRITFC Contract number C13-11 Fiscal Year 2013 (May 1, 2013-April 30, 2014) BPA Contract number 60877 BPA Project number 2008-524-00 1Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, U. S. Geological Survey, 104 Nash Hall, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331 *E-mail: [email protected]; phone: 541-737-1964 2current address: Rural Aquaculture Promotion, Peace Corps, Lusaka, Zambia 3current address: Calapooia, North Santiam, and South Santiam Watershed Councils Brownsville, OR 4current address: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Salem, OR Corvallis, OR 97331 5Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, 104 Nash Hall, Oregon State University 6USGS, Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, 104 Nash Hall Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331. [email protected] Acknowledgements Funding for this study was provided by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission through the Columbia Basin Fish Accords partnership with the Bonneville Power Administration under project 2008-524-00, Brian McIlraith, project manager. Fieldwork assistance was generously provided by J. Doyle, B. Gregorie, B. McIlraith, K. Kuhn, V. Mayfield, R. McCoun, J. Sáenz, L. Schwabe, K. McDonnell and C. Christianson. B. Heinith, J. Peterson, B. Gerth, G. Giannico, J. Jolley, G.
    [Show full text]
  • Luckiamute Meadows Property Funding
    DOE F 1325.8 e Electronic Form Approved by CGIR - 01/20/95 (8-89) United States Government Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration memorandum DATE: May 15, 2013 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum TO : Dorie Welch Project Manager – KEWM-4 Proposed Action: Luckiamute Meadows property funding. Fish and Wildlife Project No.: 2011-003-00, Contract # BPA-007071 Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): B1.25 Real Property transfers for cultural protection, habitat preservation and wildlife management. Location: Kings Valley quadrangle, in Benton County, Oregon (near Kings Valley, Oregon) Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Description of the Proposed Action: The BPA is proposing to fund the Greenbelt Trust’s purchase of the Luckiamute Meadows property (Property), a 73.6-acre parcel of land located just east of Kings Valley in Benton County, Oregon. This conservation Property is located within a priority conservation area for riparian and aquatic habitats identified in the Oregon Conservation Strategy, adopted by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife in 2006. One of the goals of the Oregon Conservation Strategy is to protect and restore native Willamette River tributary habitats and the species that rely on them. In addition, the Property is contiguous with an existing conservation easement creating a conservation zone of nearly 225 acres adjacent to the Luckiamute River that includes the confluence of the Luckiamute River and Price Creek. This funding partially fulfills commitments made in the 2010 “Willamette River Basin Memorandum of Agreement Regarding Wildlife Habitat Protection and Enhancement between the State of Oregon and the Bonneville Power Administration”.
    [Show full text]
  • Luckiamute State Natural Area Master Plan
    LUCKIAMUTE STATE NATURAL AREA MASTER PLAN DECEMBER 2006 DRAFT Acknowledgments OPRD Director: Tim Wood, Director Kyleen Stone, Assistant Director, Recreation Programs and Planning OPRD Staff: Ron Campbell, Master Planning Coordinator Jack Wiles, Area 2 Manager Dennis Wiley, Assistant Area 2 Manager Ryan Sparks, Park Manager Eric Timmons, Former Park Manager Kathy Schutt, Master Planning Manager Tammy Baumann, Master Planning Assistant Brady Callahan, GIS Program Coordinator Dave Quillin, GIS Technician Terry Bergerson, SCORP Planner Noel Bacheller, Natural Resource Specialist / Botanist Jay Schleier, Natural Resource Specialist / Wildlife Biologist Advisory Name Affiliation Committee: Ray Fiori ODFW Rebecca Goggans OSU Dept. of Fisheries and Wildlife Travis Williams Willamette Riverkeeper / Water Trail Peter Idema, Director Benton County Planning Jerry Davis, Director Benton County Parks Tony Johnson Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Jim Allen, Former Director Polk County Planning Andrew Schmidt USDA / CREP Program Kirk Lewis Luckiamute Watershed Council / Neighbor Dean Underwood Neighbor / OPRD Agricultural Leases Other Contributors: Special thanks to Joel Geier for contributing data from the BirdNotes database to supplement the wildlife-related chapters of the Master Plan. Contacts: Ryan Sparks, Park Manager (503) 393-1172 Ron Campbell, Master Planning Coordinator (503) 986-0743 Kathy Schutt, Master Planning Manager (503) 986-0745 Luckiamute State Natural Area Draft Master Plan i Luckiamute State Natural Area Draft Master Plan ii TABLE
    [Show full text]
  • Camas Bulbs, the Kalapuya, and Gender: Exploring Evidence of Plant Food Intensification in the Willamette Valley of Oregon
    CAMAS BULBS, THE KALAPUYA, AND GENDER: EXPLORING EVIDENCE OF PLANT FOOD INTENSIFICATION IN THE WILLAMETTE VALLEY OF OREGON By Stephenie Kramer A paper submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ANTHROPOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF OREGON Department of Anthropology June 2000 Camas Bulbs, the Kalapuya, and Gender: Exploring Evidence of Plant Food Intensification in the Willamette Valley of Oregon Stephenie Kramer 1 June 2000 A Masters paper in partial fulfillment of M.S. degree, University of Oregon, Department of Anthropology Advisor: Madonna L. Moss, Associate Professor 1 2nd Reader: Guy LiTala, Research Associate ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I have many people to thank for supporting me through the writing of this paper. First, I would like to thank Dr. Alston Thoms for writing his dissertation in the first place. It served as a continual reference guide, and remains the quintessential resource on camas thus far. He also graciously took the time to answer my many e-mails and provided notes. I would also like to thank Dr. Pam Endzweig, Dr. C. Mel Aikens and Cindi Gabai at the Museum of Natural History for allowing me access to the camas bulbs both on display and in the collection. I am also grateful to Pam for her continual encouragement and friendship; my time spent at the museum was among my best graduate school experiences. Thanks also to Dr. Guy Tasa for his statistics expertise and many engaging discussions about camas harvesting and selecting. I especially thank my advisor, Madonna Moss, for her tireless and thorough editing, and for validating and expanding my interest in gender and archaeology.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. ABSTRACT the Luckiamute River
    Bedrock Control on Slope Gradients in the Luckiamute Watershed, Central Coast Range, Oregon: Implications for Sediment Transport and Storage Stephen B. Taylor, Earth and Physical Sciences Department, Western Oregon University, Monmouth, Oregon 97360, email: [email protected] 1. ABSTRACT that bedrock lithology exerts a strong control on hillslope morphology, style of hillslope process, and The Luckiamute River watershed drains 815 km2 valley erosion dynamics in headwater portions of the along the east flank of the Coast Range in west- Luckiamute. central Oregon. Active mountain building and The interplay between hillslope transport extreme precipitation patterns result in a dynamic mechanisms, delivery rates, and channel hydraulics geomorphic system characterized by seasonal control the volume of sediment exported or stored flooding and slope failure. Style of surficial process within a mountainous watershed. The comparatively and landform associations are controlled by steep, debris-flow-prone slopes and wide valley topographic position, underlying bedrock geology, bottoms in the Tyee Domain indicate a potential for and resistance to erosion. hillslope transport rates to be greater than the ability Bedrock map units are grouped into four of the channel system to export sediment. Analytical lithospatial domains, these include the Siletz River results presented herein provide a preliminary dataset Volcanics Domain (south), the Tyee Domain (west- upon which to build a field-based sediment-storage southwest), the Yamhill-Intrusive Domain (north- budget for the Luckiamute watershed. The working northwest), and the Valley Fill-Spencer Domain hypothesis is that the Tyee Domain has a (east). The Siletz River Domain comprises 19% of significantly greater volume of valley-bottom the watershed and is mainly seafloor basalt.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Geology of the Luckiamute River Watershed, Upper Willamette Basin
    Geology of the Luckiamute River Watershed, Upper Willamette Basin, Polk and Benton Counties, Oregon Stephen B. Taylor, Department of Earth and Physical Science, Western Oregon University, Monmouth, Oregon 97361, [email protected] (May 2004) INTRODUCTION River to 1016 m (3333 ft) at Fanno Peak. The Luckiamute has an average gradient of 3 m/km, a total This report is compiled as part of the stream length of 90.7 km, and an average basin Luckiamute Watershed assessment, conducted under elevation of 277 m (910 ft) (Rhea, 1993; Slack and the auspices of the Luckimaute Watershed Council. others, 1993). Fanno Ridge separates the watershed This work forms part of long-term research on the into two tributary subbasins, with the Little Luckiamute by faculty and students at Western Luckiamute to the north and the main stem of the Oregon University. The project was derived from a 6- Luckiamute proper to the south (Kings Valley) week Environmental Science Institute course (Figure 1). Lower-order tributaries include Boughey convened in Summer 2001 at Western Oregon Creek, Waymire Creek, Vincent Creek, Plunkett University. The institute course targeted Creek, Woods Creek, Maxfield Creek, and Soap undergraduate science majors, preservice education Creek. majors, practicing education professionals, and The greater Willamette Valley extends masters-level education students. The course was northward 190 km from Eugene to Portland, Oregon. designed with four integrated science modules in This lowland is up to 60 km wide, separating the geomorphology, field botany, paleoclimatology, and Coast Range to the west from the Cascade Range to environmental chemistry. The geomorphology the east. Valley floor elevations range from 150 m module focused on landscape analysis, geographic (500 ft) to 3 m (10 ft), with an average gradient of 2 information systems, surficial mapping methodology, m/km (Slack and others, 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Facts from Benton County December 23, 2013 • Flood Facts from Benton County 3 a Few Steps Now Will Prevent Damage Later Branches
    At Your Service...Every Day since 1847 from LOOD ACTS BENTON COUNTY FDecember 23, 2013 F Benton County, Oregon When it rains, it pours … and you’re in a floodplain This information is being distributed to portion of your property is located in or is established. Benton County is one of only property owners whom county records near a floodplain. eight communities – including the cities of indicate own property within the Federal Rural Benton County has approximately Albany and Corvallis (added in 2012), Marion Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 57,000 acres of land located within County and Tillamook County – to maintain designated floodplain in Benton County. floodplains and nearly 3,200 individual Class 6 ratings in Oregon. Rural Benton Flooding can cause significant property parcels that are partially or entirely located County residents have enjoyed Class 6 level damage and poses a threat to life and safety. within a floodplain. discounts of 20% on their flood insurance The following information is provided Benton County is committed to continued premiums for the past six years due to the to increase flood hazard awareness and participation in the National Flood Insurance county’s maintenance of that classification. provide information about steps that can Program (NFIP) on behalf of its citizens. Statewide only one government agency – the be taken to minimize the risk of injury and Since 2007 Benton County has maintained city of Portland – has a lower rating, at Class property damage in the event of a flood. If a Class 6 floodplain management rating, 5. you have questions or would like additional resulting in a 20% discount on flood Because standard property insurance information, please refer to the “Contact insurance premiums for properties does not cover flood damage, all eligible Information” section on Page 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Henry Zenk September 8, 2006 the Kalapuyan Presence in Oregon's
    Henry Zenk September 8, 2006 The Kalapuyan Presence in Oregon's Geographic Names1 CALAPOOIA RIVER, CALAPOOYA MOUNTAINS. In Chinuk Wawa and other local languages, including the three Kalapuyan languages, /k,alaphu3ya/ was the usual general name for Kalapuyan speakers. The name has also been used more narrowly, to refer to all Central Kalapuyans or to one or another Central Kalapuyan group: in the Dayton Treaty of 1855, for example, it designates the Ahantchuyuk or Pudding River tribe, which occupied French Prairie, the part of the Willamette Valley extending from Champoeg south to Salem.2 The name evidently came into regional currency from Chinookan, where it has been recorded in the inflected forms /itk,alapúyawaykš/ (Clackamas dialect), /itgalapúywiyukš/ (Wasco and Wishram dialects). However, the stem forms themselves (/-k,alapúywa-/, /-galapúywi-/) appear not to be Chinookan, but of unknown origin. CHAMPOEG. According to some historical sources, this was originally a Kalapuyan village name.3h Gatschet recorded a3mpuik as the name of "a little town in French Prairie" located near a hill called in Tualatin / Va Vi3mapu3i Vuk/ 'place (in front of?) /pu3i h4uk/ (yampah, Perideridea sp.)'. While the name of the town and the name of the hill appear to be related, Gatschet's note is ambiguous as to whether hámpuik is really a proper Kalapuyan form, or just a Tualatin-speakers' pronunciation of the name of the historical Whites' town. It may be that the historical name "Champoeg" (historically /ch|m0pÇeg, /ch|m0poo0k, though usually heard now as /sh|m0pÇeg or even /sh|m0poo0) represents a contraction of, or a Whites' misconstrual for a more complete form.
    [Show full text]
  • DOGAMI Bulletin 35, Geology of the Dallas and Valsetz Quadrangles, Oregon
    STATE OF OREGON DEPARTM ENT OF GEOLOGY AN D MINERAL INDUSTRIES 1069 State Office Building Portland Oregon - 97201 BULLETI N 35 {Revised Edition) 1964 GEOLOGY OF THE DALLAS AND VALSETZ QUADRANGLES, OREGON By EWART M. BALDWIN Professor of Geolog y University of Oregon Governi ng Bo ard Frank C. McColloch, Chairman Portland Fayette I. Bristol Grants Pass Harold Banta Baker Hollis M. Dole State Geologist FOREWORD TO THE FIRST EDITION The rec onnaissance geologic maps of the adjoining Dallas and Valsetz 15-minute quadrangles, together with the descriptive text in this bu lletin, are the results of work undertaken by the State geological su r­ vey . This important survey work was discontinued during the war and resumed in 1 946 . The two quad­ rangles are located in northwestern Oregon, mainly in Polk County, and cover a section of the summit and eastern slope o(the Coast Range and a portion of the western part of the Willamette Valley. The selection of the Dallas-Valsetz area for geological survey work stemmed primarily from the De­ partment's efforts to find limestone deposits of better quality than those now known in the area . Such de­ posits are badly needed both for industry and agricultural stone . The survey was not successfu l in finding commercial deposits of high-grade stone bu t information was obtained which indicates the favorable geo­ logical horizon where limestone deposits could probably be found and where further prospecting should be done. This stu dy of the area allows a clea rer understanding of stratigraphy, struc ture, and geologic history of the Coast Range .
    [Show full text]