DOCSLIB.ORG

Passenger Rail Feasibility Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Passenger Rail Feasibility Study East Central Intergovernmental Association Passenger Rail Feasibility Study Proposal prepared by Quandel Consultants, Inc. QUANDEL CONSULTANTS 525 Dunham Rd. Suite 3 St. Charles, IL 60174 312-285-8191 quandelconsultants.com December 18, 2020 East Central Intergovernmental Association c/o Chandra Ravada, Director of Transportation 7600 Commerce Park Dubuque, IA 52002 Re: PROPOSAL for the PASSENGER RAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY Dear Mr. Ravada: Quandel Consultants is pleased to submit our proposal for completing the Passenger Rail Feasibility Study between Chicago/Rockford and Dubuque. Our passion and history with intercity passenger rail in this region give us unique understanding of the importance of re-establishing a once prominent service to better connect our Midwestern cities and states. Quandel is an experienced engineering consulting firm that specializes in intercity passenger railroad planning and design and is distinctively qualified to conduct this feasibility study. The attached proposal includes the qualifications of our team, a description of our successful projects, and a scope and schedule specifically tailored to meet your requirements. The personnel on our team have been carefully selected to include a combination of elite qualifications suited specifically for the needs of this project. We recognize the need to have a deep bench of knowledgeable staff who have prior experience and strong relationships with CN, BNSF, and Amtrak, who understand the current challenges faced with establishing passenger rail service in a freight-centric railroad environment. Your Project Manager for this very important study will be Daniel Schulte, PE. Dan is the Senior Director of Engineering at Quandel and has served as project manager on numerous intercity passenger and commuter rail projects throughout the Midwest. Dan is highly motivated by community-driven solutions for maximizing opportunities to access modern transportation systems. Dan will lead this project from Quandel’s St. Charles, IL office, conveniently located less than an hour drive from the East end of the study area. Dan will be supported by both seasoned veterans and determined younger staff, all focused on supporting a better regional passenger rail system. Additional key Quandel staff include Dave Simon, PE – Railroad coordination lead; Bill Otter – Railroad Infrastructure Expert; Mark Walbrun, PE – Passenger Stations Expert; Melanie Johnson, PE – Grant Writing Expert; and Charles Hoppesch - Railroad Operations expert. Quandel is thrilled to be working with our valued subconsultants - Images, Inc. and ESH Consult. Images provides the gold standard in stakeholder and public engagement expertise for passenger rail projects, and ESH is a highly sought after, nationally recognized passenger rail and transit ridership and economics analyst. Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal for this interesting and exciting project! We look forward to collaborating with the ECIA Project Team to prepare this study and set the groundwork for grant opportunities. Included with the proposal, in a separate file, is our cost proposal, which is valid for 90 days. If you have any questions or comments concerning our submission, please contact us at your convenience. Respectfully submitted, Quandel Consultants, Inc. Charles H. Quandel, P.E., Daniel R. Schulte, P.E., Chief Executive Officer VP, Senior Director of Engineering ENGINNERING SOLUTIONS FOR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS INTRODUCTION TO QUANDEL CONSULTANTS Brief History of Firm Quandel Consultants (Quandel) is a Chicago-based professional engineering firm specializing in intercity passenger rail. For the past twelve years Quandel has worked hand in hand with federal, state, and local governments and host railroads to develop shared-use rail corridors and implement new and improved intercity passenger rail service. The founders of Quandel have been engaged in passenger rail planning since the 1990s when they were the lead planners of the Midwest Regional Rail Initiative (MWRRI). Since our founding in 2007, Quandel has grown to 28 professionals dedicated to rail planning, engineering, operations, and program management making us one of the largest “pure” rail engineering firms in Illinois. Our staff has worked on all facets of rail projects including planning and environmental studies, design and engineering for capital projects, oversight of construction, operations and maintenance. A key component of many of our projects is an operational analysis of combined services in shared rail corridors. Quandel has worked on an array of projects evaluating shared passenger/freight corridors and shared passenger/trail corridors. We utilize Berkley Simulation Software’s Rail Traffic Controller software, a sophisticated rail simulation modeling tool, and our strong relationships with host railroads and the Federal Railroad Administration to collaboratively solve issues related to disparate services operating in a single right-of-way. With two offices in Chicagoland supported by several satellite offices throughout the country, Quandel effectively serves our public and private clients including Wisconsin DOT, Michigan DOT, Illinois DOT, Indiana DOT, Ohio DOT, Minnesota DOT, Iowa DOT, Missouri DOT and Colorado DOT. We have worked with virtually all the Class 1 freight railroads, Metra, All Aboard Florida, Amtrak, Ann Arbor Area Transit Authority, and Northern Indiana Transportation District and enjoy excellent relationships with client personnel. Staff Location and Availability Our Project Manager, Daniel Schulte, will lead this project from our St. Charles, IL office with support from key staff residing in Chicago, Madison, WI and Grand Rapids, MI. Dan has been with Quandel for 11 years supporting Midwest intercity passenger rail projects in Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin – he has extensive experience in planning, design, construction and operations of mixed passenger/freight railroads. Dan and all key staff identified in the following pages are available for immediate work on this project. We have carefully developed a work plan to advance the work within the expected timeline listed in the Request for Proposal, and this work plan accommodates staff time on other projects. Quandel is excited to be teaming with two strategic subconsultants – Images, Inc. and ESH Consult. Images staff will support the project from its Naperville, IL office, and ESH is based in Virginia. East Central Intergovernmental Association Passenger Rail Feasibility Study 3 QUALIFICATIONS & RELEVANT EXPERIENCE OF KEY STAFF Daniel Schulte, P.E. Project Manager Dan Schulte offers over 16 years of experience on transportation planning and engineering projects, spending the last 11 years at Quandel focused on intercity passenger rail projects in the Midwest. Dan understands the process and unique challenges associated with reinstating passenger service on a freight railroad that has not supported passenger trains for a long time. As the PM for this Study, Dan will facilitate the progression of work in a transparent manner with ECIA Project Team, as well as develop a positive report with other stakeholders including the host railroads. The confidentiality of information provided by the railroads will be of utmost importance to sustaining a positive working relationship, and Dan will ensure that the study’s analysis and results are factual, accurate and representative of the needs of each affected agency. At Quandel, Dan has served as a project manager for several multi-faceted passenger rail projects, including supporting the Michigan DOT Office of Rail implementation of its $400 million accelerated rail improvement program between Dearborn and Kalamazoo. In this role, Dan is an integral team member supporting MDOT for the management of the railroad infrastructure, including program management, design, construction support, and development of capital and maintenance planning for the corridor. He has sustained relationships with stakeholders for this project including MDOT, Amtrak, freight operators and several local agencies. The project’ continued success is in large part due to Dan’s efforts to continually improve the relationship between MDOT and Amtrak, and to develop projects specifically competitive for FRA grant programs. Dan has led the effort to secure $62 million in grants over the past In Illinois, Dan has served the past 4 years as the Program Engineer for Illinois DOT’s Chicago to Quad Cities Passenger Rail Corridor Enhancement Program. In this role, Dan has coordinated a multi- disciplined design team through the Preliminary Engineering and NEPA phase for the planned re- installation of Amtrak service to Moline, IL on the former Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad, now owned by Iowa Interstate Railroad. David Simon, P.E. Railroad Coordination Lead Dave Simon joined Quandel consultants in 2020 after a 32-year career with the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT). He served in many roles during that time, most recently as the Director of the Bureau of Transit, Local Roads, Railroads and Harbors. Dave managed numerous program activities that directed the development, implementation and financing of highway, transit, railroad, and waterway infrastructure projects. One of Dave’s key roles was addressing legislative and citizen concerns regarding department policies and transportation system condition. As Chief of Railroads & Harbors, Dave worked extensively with all the railroads that operate in Wisconsin and led many railroad
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Master HSIPR Selection Sheet 030413 Updates.Xlsx
    FRA High‐Speed Intercity Passenger Rail (HSIPR) Program Updated 3/4/2013 Funding Selection Summary (Sorted by State Abbreviation, Funding Source, and Project Type) Funding Potential Estimated State Project Type Project Name Project Summary Source Funding* Alabama ‐ Total Funding Amount: $200,000 AL FY 2009 Planning Project New Passenger Rail Service in Alabama Completion of a feasibility study to restore intercity passenger rail service from Birmingham to Montgomery to Mobile, AL.$ 200,000 Amtrak ‐ Total Funding Amount: $449,944,000 This project will boost capacity, reliability, and speed in one of the most heavily used sections of the Northeast Corridor (NEC). The project will create a 24 mile segment of track between New Brunswick and Trenton, NJ capable of 160 mph train operations with high‐tension catenary, upgraded electric Amtrak ARRA Corridor Program NEC Power, Signal, Track, Catenary Improvements power facilities, and high‐speed rail interlockings that allow express trains to overtake and pass local trains, reducing delays that often affect this track $ 449,944,000 section. In addition, this project makes related track and interlocking investments between Trenton, NJ and Morrisville, PA and at New York Penn Station. The upgraded power facilities will reduce power failures, which are frequently experienced on this segment of the NEC. California ‐ Total Funding Amount: $4,243,143,231 This project encompasses the purchase of 15 passenger rail cars and 4 locomotives for use on the Pacific Surfliner, San Joaquin, and Capitol Corridors in California. These new cars and locomotives will be compliant with standards for equipment that can travel at speeds up to 125 mph established Next Generation Passenger Rail Equipment CA ‐ DOT ARRA Corridor Program pursuant to Section 305 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-02-398 Intercity Passenger Rail: Amtrak Needs to Improve Its
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Honorable Ron Wyden GAO U.S. Senate April 2002 INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL Amtrak Needs to Improve Its Decisionmaking Process for Its Route and Service Proposals GAO-02-398 Contents Letter 1 Results in Brief 2 Background 3 Status of the Growth Strategy 6 Amtrak Overestimated Expected Mail and Express Revenue 7 Amtrak Encountered Substantial Difficulties in Expanding Service Over Freight Railroad Tracks 9 Conclusions 13 Recommendation for Executive Action 13 Agency Comments and Our Evaluation 13 Scope and Methodology 16 Appendix I Financial Performance of Amtrak’s Routes, Fiscal Year 2001 18 Appendix II Amtrak Route Actions, January 1995 Through December 2001 20 Appendix III Planned Route and Service Actions Included in the Network Growth Strategy 22 Appendix IV Amtrak’s Process for Evaluating Route and Service Proposals 23 Amtrak’s Consideration of Operating Revenue and Direct Costs 23 Consideration of Capital Costs and Other Financial Issues 24 Appendix V Market-Based Network Analysis Models Used to Estimate Ridership, Revenues, and Costs 26 Models Used to Estimate Ridership and Revenue 26 Models Used to Estimate Costs 27 Page i GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking Appendix VI Comments from the National Railroad Passenger Corporation 28 GAO’s Evaluation 37 Tables Table 1: Status of Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions, as of December 31, 2001 7 Table 2: Operating Profit (Loss), Operating Ratio, and Profit (Loss) per Passenger of Each Amtrak Route, Fiscal Year 2001, Ranked by Profit (Loss) 18 Table 3: Planned Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions 22 Figure Figure 1: Amtrak’s Route System, as of December 2001 4 Page ii GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 April 12, 2002 The Honorable Ron Wyden United States Senate Dear Senator Wyden: The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) is the nation’s intercity passenger rail operator.
    [Show full text]
  • CP in Minnesota
    CP+KCS: THE BETTER OPTION FOR CHICAGO A CP+KCS COMBINATION PROVIDES BOTH THE FLEXIBILITY TO BYPASS CHICAGO AND THE ABILITY TO IMPROVE OPERATIONS IN THE CITY, WHICH WILL BE OF ENORMOUS BENEFIT TO CP AND KCS CUSTOMERS. With CP’s network through Iowa and KCS’ connection in Kansas City, our customers would benefit from improved flows between Canada and the U.S. Upper Midwest with Mexico, Texas and Louisiana. We would also create additional capacity for growth in Chicago while unlocking positive environmental benefits through reduced emissions in the city. By contrast, Canadian National Railway’s proposed KCS combination would fail to create these benefits and instead result in increased traffic and congestion for Chicago. FUTUREFORFREIGHT.COM IMPROVED SERVICE & CP’s Chicago Facilities CONNECTIVITY Strategically located northwest of By running south to Chicago and Kansas City – through the Twin downtown Chicago, CP's intermodal Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota, and through facilities at Bensenville and Schiller Park Milwaukee – CP offers a direct, single-carrier route between near O’Hare Airport provide direct western Canada and the U.S. Midwest, providing access to Great access to Chicago, northern Illinois, Lakes and Mississippi River ports. southern Wisconsin and eastern Iowa. From La Crosse, Wisconsin, the Central Corridor continues south toward Kansas City via the Quad Cities (Davenport and Three major highways surrounding the Bettendorf in Iowa, and Rock Island and Moline in Illinois), intermodal yards help move cargo to its providing an efficient route for traffic destined for southern U.S. destination faster, while keeping it out and Mexican markets via KCS' network from Kansas City of downtown Chicago.
    [Show full text]
  • 40Thanniv Ersary
    Spring 2011 • $7 95 FSharing tihe exr periencste of Fastest railways past and present & rsary nive 40th An Things Were Not the Same after May 1, 1971 by George E. Kanary D-Day for Amtrak 5We certainly did not see Turboliners in regular service in Chicago before Amtrak. This train is In mid April, 1971, I was returning from headed for St. Louis in August 1977. —All photos by the author except as noted Seattle, Washington on my favorite train to the Pacific Northwest, the NORTH back into freight service or retire. The what I considered to be an inauspicious COAST LIMITED. For nearly 70 years, friendly stewardess-nurses would find other beginning to the new service. Even the the flagship train of the Northern Pacific employment. The locomotives and cars new name, AMTRAK, was a disappoint - RR, one of the oldest named trains in the would go into the AMTRAK fleet and be ment to me, since I preferred the classier country, had closely followed the route of dispersed country wide, some even winding sounding RAILPAX, which was eliminat - the Lewis and Clark Expedition of 1804, up running on the other side of the river on ed at nearly the last moment. and was definitely the super scenic way to the Milwaukee Road to the Twin Cities. In addition, wasn’t AMTRAK really Seattle and Portland. My first association That was only one example of the serv - being brought into existence to eliminate with the North Coast Limited dated to ices that would be lost with the advent of the passenger train in America? Didn’t 1948, when I took my first long distance AMTRAK on May 1, 1971.
    [Show full text]
  • R0202'11 LSB Research Services Division MG
    Rep. McCann offered the following concurrent resolution: House Concurrent Resolution No. 41. A concurrent resolution to urge the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) to pursue bicycle friendly policies by providing for bicycles on board trains and bicycle parking in future station plans. Whereas, An efficient, modern, transportation system is a pillar of a healthy economic climate and vital for Michigan's future. All modes of 21st century transportation infrastructure should be made accessible to modern travelers, whether tourists or commuters. Seamless multi-modal connections are essential to facilitate tourism and to allow greater mobility for bike commuters and those without cars. Bicyclists should be able to switch between transportation modes and link trips by bringing bicycles on trains without having to check them as boxed luggage. Bicycle tourism and commuting would be further accommodated with short and long-term bike parking at Amtrak stations. Unfortunately, Amtrak does not allow bicycles on board Michigan routes at this time and bike parking is not always available; and Whereas, Amtrak's routes out of Chicago, the Downstate Illinois Service and Missouri River Runner, offer roll-on bike service; the option to bring bicycles on board, either by storing bikes on board in bike racks, or secured as checked baggage with tie-down equipment (not in a box), and allow folding bicycles on board as carry-on baggage. All three of the Michigan Amtrak routes, The Blue Water, Lake Shore Limited and Pere Marquette lines, use the same equipment as Chicago area trains and would only have to update the reservations system to allow bikes on board in Michigan; and Whereas, Bicycle tourism is a booming industry and many Michigan bike tour events are located in or near cities accessible by Amtrak service.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Input Sought Through June 14 on New Illinois Rail Study
    tureKara . State of Illinois JB Pritzker, Governor Illinois Department of Transportation Omer Osman, Acting Secretary FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: CONTACT: June 1, 2021 Paul Wappel 217.685.0082 Maria Castaneda 312.447.1919 Public input sought through June 14 on new Illinois rail study SPRINGFIELD – The Illinois Department of Transportation is inviting the public to comment and offer suggestions on a new study assessing the state’s rail system. The goal of the study is to seek input on current conditions, capacity concerns and safety challenges to help identify potential improvements and solutions. Comments will be collected through June 14 via illinoisrailneeds.org which includes a short video, informational displays and a link to a survey. The information gathered will be used in the development of a statewide rail plan, a requirement of states seeking federal funding under the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act. It also will serve to inform IDOT’s ongoing Illinois Long-Range Transportation Plan, providing strategic direction for the development of the state’s transportation system. Illinois is the rail hub of North America, the only state in which all seven Class 1 railroads operate. Illinois boasts more than 10,000 miles of track and serves a robust passenger rail network, with Amtrak connecting 30 communities statewide and Metra operating 11 lines in the Chicago area. Under Gov. JB Pritzker’s bipartisan Rebuild Illinois capital program, Illinois is making historic investments in both passenger and freight rail, including $500 million to re-establish passenger rail to the Quad Cities and Rockford, $400 million for the Chicago Region Environmental and Transportation and Efficiency (CREATE) Program, $100 million for improvements to improve safety and reliability on Amtrak’s Saluki service between Chicago and Carbondale, and $78 million to upgrade rail crossings and improve safety throughout the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak Chicago Area Update
    Amtrak Chicago Area Update Amtrak will operate modified schedules for Chicago Hub Services on Tuesday, Jan. 28, following conversations with freight railroads that host Amtrak trains to and from Chicago and in consultation with state transportation departments that sponsor the services. These cancelations are designed to maintain service on most routes while reducing exposure of Amtrak passengers, crews and rail equipment to extreme weather conditions. Passengers are urged to heed the warnings of local officials to use caution making their way to and from stations and to expect delays in bitter cold, gusty winds and blowing snow. A range of tools - including Amtrak.com, smartphone apps and calls to 800-USA-RAIL - are available to assist in travel planning and to provide train status information. The following Amtrak Chicago Hub Services will not be available on Tuesday, Jan. 28: Lincoln Service Trains 300, 301, 306 & 307 are canceled. (Trains 302, 303, 304 & 305 and Trains 21/321 & 22/322 will maintain service on the Chicago-St. Louis corridor) Hiawatha Service Trains 329, 332, 333, 336, 337 & 340 are canceled. (Trains 330, 331, 334, 335, 338, 339, 341 & 342 will maintain service on the Chicago-Milwaukee corridor) Wolverine Service Trains 350 & 355 are canceled. (Trains 351, 352, 353 & 354 will maintain service on the Chicago-Ann Arbor-Detroit/Pontiac corridor) Illinois Zephyr & Carl Sandburg Trains 380 & 381 are canceled. (Amtrak is awaiting word from BNSF Railway Co. regarding service by Trains 382 & 383 on the Chicago-Galesburg-Quincy corridor on Tuesday, Jan. 28. The route was closed by BNSF late Sunday night, leading Trains 380, 381, 382 & 383 to be canceled on Monday, Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago-South Bend-Toledo-Cleveland-Erie-Buffalo-Albany-New York Frequency Expansion Report – Discussion Draft 2 1
    Chicago-South Bend-Toledo-Cleveland-Erie-Buffalo- Albany-New York Frequency Expansion Report DISCUSSION DRAFT (Quantified Model Data Subject to Refinement) Table of Contents 1. Project Background: ................................................................................................................................ 3 2. Early Study Efforts and Initial Findings: ................................................................................................ 5 3. Background Data Collection Interviews: ................................................................................................ 6 4. Fixed-Facility Capital Cost Estimate Range Based on Existing Studies: ............................................... 7 5. Selection of Single Route for Refined Analysis and Potential “Proxy” for Other Routes: ................ 9 6. Legal Opinion on Relevant Amtrak Enabling Legislation: ................................................................... 10 7. Sample “Timetable-Format” Schedules of Four Frequency New York-Chicago Service: .............. 12 8. Order-of-Magnitude Capital Cost Estimates for Platform-Related Improvements: ............................ 14 9. Ballpark Station-by-Station Ridership Estimates: ................................................................................... 16 10. Scoping-Level Four Frequency Operating Cost and Revenue Model: .................................................. 18 11. Study Findings and Conclusions: .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Project Description
    Chicago to Quad Cities Passenger Rail Project Grade Crossing Design Illinois DOT - Various Locations Project Description The project provides Program Management along with planning and preliminary engineering services for the Illinois Department of Transportation to implement passenger rail service on the Chicago to Iowa City corridor within the State of Illinois project limits. The Chicago-Iowa City Passenger Rail Service Development Program of Iowa and Illinois will establish passenger rail service between Chicago, the Quad Cities, Illinois and Iowa City, Iowa, 219.5 miles. The service will be hosted by BNSF Railway (BNSF) and Iowa Interstate Railroad (IAIS), and be operated by Amtrak. New stations will be established at Geneseo and Moline, Illinois (serving the Quad Cities); and Iowa City, Iowa. The service will be part of the Midwest Regional Rail Imitative (MWRRI) designated by the Secretary of Transportation as a high-speed rail corridor in 1992. The initial Chicago-Iowa City passenger-train service will consist of two roundtrip trains daily, operating at a maximum speed of 79 mph. Ridership is estimated by Amtrak at 246,800 passengers in the Program’s opening year, and 447,000 passengers per year by 2045. The alignment of the route is suited to high-speed passenger-train operation, and had previously hosted passenger trains exceeded 100-mph. Station access to major traffic sources such as the University of Iowa, and travel patterns are all favorable to high initial ridership. The States envision future increases in maximum speed to 110 mph, increases in frequency of trains, and extension of the service to Omaha, Nebraska.
    [Show full text]
  • 20210419 Amtrak Metrics Reporting
    NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION 30th Street Station Philadelphia, PA 19104 April 12, 2021 Mr. Michael Lestingi Director, Office of Policy and Planning Federal Railroad Administrator U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. Lestingi: In accordance with the Metrics and Minimum Standards for Intercity Passenger Rail Service final rule published on November 16, 2020 (the “Final Rule”), this letter serves as Amtrak’s report to the Federal Railroad Administration that, as of April 10, 2021, Amtrak has provided the 29 host railroads over which Amtrak currently operates (listed in Appendix A) with ridership data for the prior month consistent with the Final Rule. The following data was provided to each host railroad: . the total number of passengers, by train and by day; . the station-specific number of detraining passengers, reported by host railroad whose railroad right-of-way serves the station, by train, and by day; and . the station-specific number of on-time passengers reported by host railroad whose railroad right- of-way serves the station, by train, and by day. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jim Blair Sr. Director, Host Railroads Amtrak cc: Dennis Newman Amtrak Jason Maga Amtrak Christopher Zappi Amtrak Yoel Weiss Amtrak Kristin Ferriter Federal Railroad Administration Mr. Michael Lestingi April 12, 2021 Page 2 Appendix A Host Railroads Provided with Amtrak Ridership Data Host Railroad1 Belt Railway Company of Chicago BNSF Railway Buckingham Branch Railroad
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 6-B: Chronology of Amtrak Service in Wisconsin
    Appendix 6-B: Chronology of Amtrak Service in Wisconsin May 1971: As part of its inaugural system, Amtrak operates five daily round trips in the Chicago- Milwaukee corridor over the Milwaukee Road main line. Four of these round trips are trains running exclusively between Chicago’s Union Station and Milwaukee’s Station, with an intermediate stop in Glenview, IL. The fifth round trip is the Chicago-Milwaukee segment of Amtrak’s long-distance train to the West Coast via St. Paul, northern North Dakota (e.g. Minot), northern Montana (e.g. Glacier National Park) and Spokane. Amtrak Route Train Name(s) Train Frequency Intermediate Station Stops Serving Wisconsin (Round Trips) Chicago-Milwaukee Unnamed 4 daily Glenview Chicago-Seattle Empire Builder 1 daily Glenview, Milwaukee, Columbus, Portage, Wisconsin Dells, Tomah, La Crosse, Winona, Red Wing, Minneapolis June 1971: Amtrak maintains five daily round trips in the Chicago-Milwaukee corridor and adds tri- weekly service from Chicago to Seattle via St. Paul, southern North Dakota (e.g. Bismark), southern Montana (e.g. Bozeman and Missoula) and Spokane. Amtrak Route Train Name(s) Train Frequency Intermediate Station Stops Serving Wisconsin (Round Trips) Chicago-Milwaukee Unnamed 4 daily Glenview Chicago-Seattle Empire Builder 1 daily Glenview, Milwaukee, Columbus, Portage, Wisconsin Dells, Tomah, La Crosse, Winona, Red Wing, Minneapolis Chicago-Seattle North Coast Tri-weekly Glenview, Milwaukee, Columbus, Portage, Wisconsin Hiawatha Dells, Tomah, La Crosse, Winona, Red Wing, Minneapolis 6B-1 November 1971: Daily round trip service in the Chicago-Milwaukee corridor is increased from five to seven as Amtrak adds service from Milwaukee to St.
    [Show full text]
  • RECONNECTING MINNESOTA the CASE for an INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL SYSTEM Conrad Defiebre Mick Conlan Transportation Fellow Graduate Research Fellow
    RECONNECTING MINNESOTA THE CASE FOR AN INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL SYSTEM Conrad deFiebre Mick Conlan Transportation Fellow Graduate Research Fellow October 2008 Table of Contents___ Key Findings & Recommendations 2 Introduction 3 The Benefits of Fast Intercity Rail 5 Minnesota Scene 7 Northern Lights Express 7 High-Speed Rail to Chicago 8 Little Crow 10 I-35 Corridor 11 Southeast Express 11 Other Routes 12 Funding Prospects 13 Reference List 14 1 Reconnecting Minnesota Key Findings & Recommendations_____ Key Findings • Modern, high-speed passenger rail service, long a transportation staple in Europe and Asia, is about to blossom in the United States, with important implications for Minnesota. A new federal study documents rail’s benefits of safety, energy conservation, highway congestion relief, environmental protection, economic development, emergency preparedness, mobility for the aging and global competitiveness. • Congress has approved by veto-proof bipartisan majorities $13 billion over five years for passenger rail initiatives. A planned high-speed route from Minneapolis to Duluth could be among the first in line for some of that money. A St. Paul-Chicago connection is also a strong contender. Local and multistate planning and engineering for both are well underway. • Together, these two projects would bring Minnesota more than 15,000 jobs, $648 million in added personal income, nearly $2 billion in enhanced property values and at least $1.2 billion to $2.3 billion in savings from reduced travel times, congestion and pollution. • Minnesota’s costs for these projects – a total of between $700 million and $750 million, according to the latest estimates – would be reduced to no more than $150 million in general obligation bonding with the help of 80 percent federal funding approved by Congress.
    [Show full text]