Preliminary Index of Utah Vascular Plant Names
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Great Basin Naturalist Volume 41 Number 1 Article 1 3-31-1981 Preliminary index of Utah vascular plant names S. L. Welsh Brigham Young University N. D. Atwood United States Forest Service, Uinta National Forest, Provo, Utah S. Goodrich United States Forest Service, Shrub Sciences Laboratory, Provo, Utah E. Neese Brigham Young University K. H. Thome Brigham Young University See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Welsh, S. L.; Atwood, N. D.; Goodrich, S.; Neese, E.; Thome, K. H.; and Albee, Beverly (1981) "Preliminary index of Utah vascular plant names," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 41 : No. 1 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol41/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Preliminary index of Utah vascular plant names Authors S. L. Welsh, N. D. Atwood, S. Goodrich, E. Neese, K. H. Thome, and Beverly Albee This article is available in Great Basin Naturalist: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol41/iss1/1 The Great Basin Naturalist Published at Provo, Utah, by Brigham Young University ISSN 0017-3614 Volume 41 March 31, 1981 No. 1 PRELIMINARY INDEX OF UTAH VASCULAR PLANT NAMES S. L. Welsh', N. D. Atwood-, S. Goodrich', E. Neese', K. H. Thome', and Beverly Albee^ Abstract.— Presented herein is an index to vascular plant names of Utah. The names are arranged in alphabetical order by genus, species, and infraspecific taxa. Each entry is followed by a bibliographic citation, family name,, rari- ty (whether endemic, rare, or endemic-rare), and origin (whether indigenous, adventive, or adventive-cultivated). Pertinent synonyms are cited beneath appropriate entries. An index of synonyms and a comprehensive bibliography are included. For many years there has existed a gap in A list of names and authors alone would the plant taxonomy of Utah—no single treat- have been useful, but bibliographic citations ment has included the names of all plant spe- given for the plant names provide an extra cies known for the state. A solution to this tool in evaluation of priority and historical difficulty was only partially realized by use perspective. of the work by Holmgren and Reveal (1966), Many names of American plants are based which included plant names for the Inter- on Utah types. A large number of these types mountain Region. Nomenclatural changes represent synonyms, but many are recog- and new taxa published since 1966 were not nized at some taxonomic level in contempo- summarized in any publication. rary treatments. Utah type information will Identification of plants from Utah requires be published in a subsequent paper. a stack of manuals, floras, and taxonomic re- Categories of information listed include visions to assure inclusion of authors' names, generic, specific, and infraspecific epithets, and to provide verification of determinations. author, bibliographic citation, rarity (rare, Specimens representing disjunctions in dis- endemic, rare-endemic), and origin (in- tribution have accumulated in the herbaria of digenous, adventive, adventive-cultivated). the state. These are well known in many in- Synonyms are included in appropriate cita- stances, but others have remained obscure. tions, especially those based on Utah types, Research leading to the present list of Utah but they are not treated as separate citations. plants has yielded many taxa not previously An index to pertinent synonyms is appended. cited in publications of botany of the state. Rarity is a concept involving paucity of Thus, herbaria form a principal basis for in- collection as much as a concept of actual clusion of names within the list. The remain- paucity in numbers or in distributional ex- ing names have been taken from literature tent. Plants judged to be rare are those nar- (see bibliography). rowly restricted endemic species as well as 'Life Science Museum and Department of Botany and Range Science, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602. 'USFS, Uinta National Forest, 88 West 100 North, Provo, Utah 84601. 'USFS, Shrub Sciences Laboratory, 735 North 500 East, Provo, Utah 84601. 'Garrett Herbarium, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112. Great Basin Naturalist Vol. 41, No. 1 those of disjunct distributions at the margin future listing and represents an area of study of their ranges. Endemics have been cited by itself. whether rare or not, because they represent a Taxonomic literature has been checked for unique portion of our flora. The endemics are most citations, but is by no means exhaustive. bibliographic the crown jewels of our state, a part of the Dates were missing for many citations, especially for those of cultivated natural heritage in unique living things. plants. Dates are not included in Index Ke- However, not all of those cited as endemics wensis, and many of the citations given in it are restricted entirely within the boundaries are incorrect for these early named Old of Utah. Where natural physiographic units World introductions. Completion of citation overlap political boundaries, and the large is based on review of other literature, espe- extent of the known distribution is in Utah, cially from Taxonomic Literature (Stafleu, F. plant taxa which extend beyond the state lim- A. 1967. Regnum Vegetabile. Vol. 57.). An its are included in the endemic category (i.e., attempt has been made to standardize liter- they are endemic to the natural features that ature citation and author abbreviations, but are crossed by political boundaries). additional work is needed. All standard li- Considerations of endangered or threat- brary references have been consulted, includ- ened status are beyond the scope of this ing the Union List of Serials and the Cata- work. Those concepts are defined in law, and logue of the British Museum. are subject to interpretation. Designations of It is expected that this preliminary list will endangered and threatened categories change be expanded and improved by inclusion of more readily than do rarity status categories data from other herbaria in Utah, whose considered herein. The species listed for stat- curators are invited to participate in up- us under stipulations of the Endangered Spe- dating and in coauthoring a subsequent cies Act of 1973 (as amended 1978) are con- revision. tained herein, but are not segregated in any Almost 5200 names were programmed into way from among the rare species. the computer. A query of this information Indigenous plants are those native species yielded the following preliminary data on in- that occur naturally within the state. Judg- digenous, cultivated, and adventive taxa in ment of which are indigenous is sometimes within Utah. These are the names included clouded by lack of information about early the following checklist: introductions in the region. Tentative judg- ments are followed by a question mark. The same is true for adventive species, those which represent inadvertent introductions from other places, especially from the Old World. Cultivated plants are mainly in- troductions, and no attempt has been made to provide an exhaustive list of all plants in this category. Some cultivated plants are nat- uralized and are a part of the continuing flora of the region (i.e., Uhnus piwiila, Ca- talpa speciosa, Ligustnim vulgare, Robinia pseudoacacia, and many others). Others are continuously reintroduced, especially weedy species and those grown as crop plants. Addi- tional ones are known only in greenhouse culture, often as mere curiosities. In any event, cultivated plants seldom are collected. We have listed, mainly, those represented in herbaria and have not distinguished among naturalized and reintroduced species or the greenhouse curiosities. That work will await March 1981 Welsh et al.: List of Utah Plants Acer saccharum Marsh., Arbust. Amer. 4. 1785. Matthew Chatterley, Deborah Engle, Trudy Aceraceae. Adventive; cultivated. Fjeldsted, Robert Jeppsen, Blaine Welsh, and Achillea filipendulina Lam., Encycl. Meth. Bot. 1: Alan Taye. 27. 1783. Asteraceae. Adventive; cultivated. Achillea millefolium L. ssp. lanulosa (Nutt.) Piper, Indigenous, Adventive, and Cultivated Mazama 2: 97. 1901. Asteraceae. Indigenous. Utah Plants (18-FEB-81) Achillea millefolium L. ssp. millefolium, Sp. PI. 899. 1753. Asteraceae. Adventive; cultivated. Abies concohr (Gord. & Glend.) Lindl. ex Hildebr., Achyronichia cooperi T. & G., Proc. Amer. Acad. 7: Verbr. Conif. 261. 1861. Pinaceae. Indigenous. 331. 1868. Caryophyllaceae. Indigenous. Rare. Abies lasiocarpa (Hook.) Nutt., N. Amer.» Sylva 3: Aconitum columbianum Nutt. in T. & G., Fl. N. 138. 1849. Pinaceae. Indigenous. Amer. 1: 34. 1838. Ranunculaceae. Indigenous. Syn: A. Abronia argillosa Welsh & Goodrich, Great Basin divaricatum Rydb.; A. glaberrimum Rydb. Nat. 40: 78. 1980. Nyctaginaceae. Indigenous. Actaea rubra (Ait.) Willd., Hort. Berol. 561. 1809. Ra- Abronia elliptica A. Nels., Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 26: nunculaceae. Indigenous. 7. 1899. Nyctaginaceae. Indigenous. Syn: A. fallax Hei- Adiantum capillus-veneris L. var. modestum (Un- nierl; A. fragrans var. pterocarpa Jones; A. piimila derw.) Fern., Rhodora 52: 206. 1950. Pteridaceae. In- Rydb.; A. salsa Rydb. ex Hook., Bot. Mis- digenous. Syn: A. modestum Underw. Abronia