Determination of Evolutionary History of Big Bluestem Populations Through Chloroplast DNA Analysis Tej Man Tamang Fort Hays State University, [email protected]
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Fort Hays State University FHSU Scholars Repository Master's Theses Graduate School Summer 2016 Determination Of Evolutionary History Of Big Bluestem Populations Through Chloroplast DNA Analysis Tej Man Tamang Fort Hays State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.fhsu.edu/theses Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Tamang, Tej Man, "Determination Of Evolutionary History Of Big Bluestem Populations Through Chloroplast DNA Analysis" (2016). Master's Theses. 41. https://scholars.fhsu.edu/theses/41 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at FHSU Scholars Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of FHSU Scholars Repository. DETERMINATION OF EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF BIG BLUESTEM POPULATIONS THROUGH CHLOROPLAST DNA ANALYSIS being A Thesis Presented to the Graduate Faculty of the Fort Hays State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science by Tej Man Tamang B.Sc., Purbanchal University Date_________________________ Approved____________________________ Major Professor Approved____________________________ Chair, Graduate Council This thesis for The Master of Science Degree by Tej Man Tamang has been approved by ___________________________ Chair, Supervisory Committee ___________________________ Supervisory Committee ___________________________ Supervisory Committee ___________________________ Supervisory Committee _________________________________ Chair, Department of Biological Sciences i ABSTRACT Andropogon gerardii Vitman (big bluestem) is one of the most dominant and widely distributed grasses of the North American prairie. It is widely used in restoration projects for the recovery of grassland ecosystems. A. gerardii demonstrates genetic and adaptive variation among populations across the prairie. With the objective to understand the evolutionary relationship between the A. gerardii populations, two noncoding chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) spacers (rpl32-trnL(UAG) and trnQ(UUG)-rps16) were studied. Similarly, genetic differentiation among the populations was also calculated based on the spacers. The trnQ(UUG)-rps16 spacer had more polymorphic sites than the rpl32-trnL(UAG) spacer. A phylogenetic tree based on combined cpDNA spacers generated a monophyletic tree for A. gerardii with a Colorado population and sand bluestem (Andropogon hallii) as the outgroups. The monophyletic tree was further resolved into two sub-clades. Most of the branches and nodes were well supported, with more than 70% of posterior probability values. However, the grouping of populations did not support the resolution of the phylogenetic tree with geological distribution. Analysis of molecular variance suggests there is a low level of genetic differentiation among the populations, with 90% of variation within the populations and 10% of variation among the populations. The observed high genetic variation within populations could be the result of potential gene flow, polyploidy, and the outcrossing nature of big bluestem. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work would not have been possible without help and support of many people. First, I express my sincere gratitude to my advisor, Dr. Brian R. Maricle, for his academic guidance, support, valuable advice and encouragement, and most importantly, for providing opportunity to conduct this research. I also thank my committee members, Dr. Yashuhiro Kobayashi, Dr. William “Bill” Stark, and Dr. Loretta Johnson, for valuable suggestions. Along with this, I express my sincere thanks to all the faculty members of the Department of Biological Sciences for all their support during my academic career at Fort Hays State University. My special gratitude goes to Dr. Yashuhiro Kobayashi for providing the technical knowledge to conduct this research. In addition, I would like to thank him for allowing me to work in his laboratory despite his busy schedule. My sincere thanks extend to Dr. Loretta Johnson for granting the access to samples, and for arranging my accommodation during my stay at Manhattan, Kansas. In addition, I express my gratitude to her for providing the access to DNA extraction lab. Thanks to Matt Galliart and Jacob Alsdurf for their help in collection of the samples, and extraction of DNA from leaf samples. My sincere gratitude goes to Dr. Terrell Balthazor for providing the funding for research assistantship, which supported a year of my graduate studies, and which in turn, gave me more time to focus on research. This Master’s thesis was funded by KINBRE mini-grant and Kansas Academy of Science. iii I thank all the graduate students of the Department of Biological Sciences for their immense help and support. Last but not least, I thank my parents for their sacrifice, advice, support, and love. This work would not have been possible without them and hence, is dedicated to my father, Saphat Singh Tamang and mother, Gyani Maiya Tamang. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page GRADUATE COMMITTEE APPROVAL ......................................................................... i ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................ ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... iii TABLE OF CONTENTS .....................................................................................................v LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ vii LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................... viii LIST OF APPENDIXES.................................................................................................... ix PREFACE ............................................................................................................................x INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 MATERIALS AND METHODS .........................................................................................7 Sample collection .....................................................................................................7 DNA extraction and amplification ...........................................................................7 Agarose gel electrophoresis, PCR purification, and sequencing .............................8 Sequence alignment and data analysis .....................................................................8 RESULTS ..........................................................................................................................10 v DISCUSSION ....................................................................................................................13 Genetic structure of the A. gerardii populations ....................................................14 Phylogenetic relationship between the A. gerardii populations based on noncoding cpDNA .................................................................................................17 Concluding remarks and future recommendations ................................................20 LITERATURE CITED ......................................................................................................22 TABLES ............................................................................................................................35 FIGURES ...........................................................................................................................40 APPENDIXES ...................................................................................................................44 vi LIST OF TABLES Page 1. PCR primer pairs used in the study to amplify noncoding cpDNA spacers rpl32-trnL(UAG) and trnQ(UUG)-rps16 in A. gerardii populations ..........................................................................................35 2. Values of h (number of haplotypes), Hd (Haplotype diversity), and π (Nucleotide diversity), based on the cpDNA (rpl32-trnL(UAG) and trnQ(UUG)-rps16) of A. gerardii populations ........................36 3. Results of the analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) based on the cpDNA spacers (rpl32-trnL(UAG) and trnQ(UUG)-rps16) for 24 populations of A. gerardii.. .........................................................................38 4. Pairwise Φpt values along with P values amongpopulations of A. gerardii .........................................................................................................39 vii LIST OF FIGURES Page 1. Map of the population locations of A. gerardii for cpDNA analysis, along with the elevation above sea level ...................................40 2. A Bayesian inference phylogenetic tree of populations of big bluestem (A. gerardii) based on the rpl32-trnL(UAG) cpDNA spacer using MrBayes 3.12 software.Numbers appearing at the nodes are posterior probabilities ............................................................................41 3. A Bayesian inference phylogenetic tree of populations of big bluestem (A. gerardii) based on trnQ(UUG)-rps16 cpDNA spacer using MrBayes 3.12 software. Numbers appearing at the nodes are posterior probabilities ............................................................................42 4. A Bayesian inference phylogenetic tree of populations of big bluestem (A. gerardii) based