EASTERN EQUATORIA STABILIZATION PROGRAMME MPTF OFFICE GENERIC FINAL PROGRAMME1 NARRATIVE REPORT REPORTING PERIOD: FROM 01.2011 TO 12.2014 Programme Title & Project Number Country, Locality(s), Priority Area(s) / Strategic Results2 Programme Title: SSRF _ Eastern Equatoria State Stabilization Priority area/ strategic results: Programme . The Lobira‐Chahari‐Lotome‐Kikilay‐Lotukei‐Kanangok road rehabilitated and surfaced; Programme Number (if applicable) . Four county headquarters constructed and equipped in Kapoeta MPTF Office Project Reference Number:3 00070595 North, Kapoeta South, Magwi and Imehejek, and one prison (200 detainee capacity) with administration block and holding cell constructed and equipped in Kapoeta North County; . Four water reservoirs (30,000 m³ each), eight human consumption water access points and water filtration unit constructed. Participating Organization(s) Implementing Partners UNOPS (Outputs 1 & 2) EES‐Ministry of Finance; EES‐Ministry of Physical Infrastructure; EES‐ UNDP (Output 3 & Oversight) Ministry of Housing and Public Utilities; EES‐Ministry of Transport and Roads; EES‐Ministry of Local Government; RSS‐Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation; PACT. Programme/Project Cost (US$) Programme Duration Total approved budget as per project document: US$ 23,449,683 Overall Duration (months): 54 MPTF /JP Contribution4: Start Date5 (dd.mm.yyyy): 01/01/2011 by Agency (if applicable) Agency Contribution Original End Date6 (dd.mm.yyyy): 31/08/2013 by Agency (if applicable) Actual End date7(dd.mm.yyyy): 30/06/2015 Government Contribution (if applicable) Have agency (ies) operationally closed the Yes No Programme in its(their) system? Other Contributions (donors) (if applicable) Expected Financial Closure date8: 31/12/2015 TOTAL: US$ 23,449,683 Programme Assessment/Review/Mid‐Term Eval. Report Submitted By Evaluation Completed o Name: Kunal Dhar Yes No Date: dd.mm.yyyy o Title: Programme Coordinator Evaluation Report ‐ Attached o Participating Organization (Lead): UNDP Yes No Date: dd.mm.yyyy o Email address: [email protected] 1 The term “programme” is used for programmes, joint programmes and projects. 2 Strategic Results, as formulated in the Strategic UN Planning Framework (e.g. UNDAF) or project document; 3 The MPTF Office Project Reference Number is the same number as the one on the Notification message. It is also referred to as “Project ID” on the project’s factsheet page the MPTF Office GATEWAY 4 The MPTF or JP Contribution, refers to the amount transferred to the Participating UN Organizations, which is available on the MPTF Office GATEWAY 5 The start date is the date of the first transfer of the funds from the MPTF Office as Administrative Agent. Transfer date is available on the MPTF Office GATEWAY 6 As per approval of the original project document by the relevant decision‐making body/Steering Committee. 7 If there has been an extension, then the revised, approved end date should be reflected here. If there has been no extension approved, then the current end date is the same as the original end date. The end date is the same as the operational closure date which is when all activities for which a Participating Organization is responsible under an approved MPTF / JP have been completed. As per the MOU, agencies are to notify the MPTF Office when a programme completes its operational activities. Please see MPTF Office Closure Guidelines. 8 Financial Closure requires the return of unspent balances and submission of the Certified Final Financial Statement and Report. Page 1 of 27 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................................ 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................. 4 I. Purpose ................................................................................................................................................ 5 II. Assessment of Programme Results .................................................................................................... 5 i) Narrative reporting on results: ............................................................................................ 5 ii) Indicator Based Performance Assessment: ............................................................................... iii) Evaluation, Best Practices and Lessons Learned .............................................................. 14 Annex I: Detail output progress matrix .................................................................................................... 17 Annex II: Programmatic Revisions ............................................................................................................ 25 Page 2 of 27 ACRONYMS CHQ County Headquarter EESP Eastern Equatoria Stabilization Programme IP Implementing Partner MPTF Multi Partners Trust Fund NGO Non Governmental Organization PUNO Participating United Nations Organization SSRF South Sudan Recovery Fund UNDAF United Nations Development Assistance Framework UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNMISS United Nations Mission in South Sudan UNOCHA United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs UNOPS United Nations Office for Project Services Page 3 of 27 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Eastern Equatoria is one of the states that have been affected by inter‐communal conflicts and the civil wars in South Sudan. The state lacks basic infrastructure like roads, health and water facilities. The presence of small arms in the hands of communities as well as competition over natural resources and cattle raiding activities are the main drivers of conflict and cause of insecurity in the state. The Eastern Equatoria Stabilisation Programme (EESP) was designed to overcome these security challenges, and revive the local economy in the remote, underserved, and conflict prone parts of the state. The priorities of EESP included; construction of Lobira‐Chahari‐Lotome‐Kikilay‐Lotukei‐Kanangok road; four county headquarters; one prison with a detainee capacity 200 persons; four water reservoirs with a capacity of 30,000 m³ each, eight human consumption water access points (boreholes) and one water filtration unit. These priorities were identified in consultations with local communities, government and implementing partners. A total of US$23,449,683 was allocated towards the EESP. Construction of 140km of road, four county headquarters; one prison complex, eight boreholes, one water filtration unit and four water reservoirs (locally known as haffirs) was completed and the facilities were handed over to the government. Joint monitoring missions and consultations with local authorities and communities revealed that the outputs contributed to improved security and reduced levels of inter‐communal conflicts in the state. The road enabled government’s access to the remote, underserved and conflict prone areas of Budi and Ikotos counties. Community trade centers were established along the newly constructed road, providing income generating opportunities for local traders. Consultations with communities revealed that the provision of water access points in Kapoeta East and Kapoeta North counties has reduced the distances that communities travel in search of water and also contributed to a reduction in inter‐ communal conflicts over water resources. The EESP facilitated extension of state authority in the four conflict affected counties of Kapoeta North, Kapoeta South, Magwi and Imehejek through the construction of County Headquarters (CHQs). This enabled early management of inter‐communal conflicts. For example, the monthly security meetings held at the CHQs are some of the mechanisms by which local governments assess security situations and take appropriate measures to enhance community security and reduce levels of inter‐ communal conflicts. Insecurity due to inter‐communal fighting and impassable roads during the long rainy season hindered accessibility to the project sites. This increased the cost and led to severe delays in the delivery of programme outputs. Completion of the haffirs was also delayed due to frequent relocation of the construction sites by the government. The violent conflict that erupted on 15 December 2013 led to a deterioration in the security situation that undermined timely delivery of the road output. To mitigate the post‐December 2013 security risks and challenges, UNDP, UNOPS and PACT coordinated with the state government and UNMISS for the provision of armed escort and patrols to access project areas with security challenges. To ensure sufficient time for implementation of construction works at the beginning of the dry season, the projects carried out assessments and tendering of construction projects as well as mobilization of construction materials during the wet season. Page 4 of 27 I. Purpose The Eastern Equatoria Stabilization Programme, funded through Window 1 of Round 3 of the South Sudan Recovery Fund (SSRF), is a UN Joint programme designed to deliver quick impacts for mitigating insecurity and communal violence in the underserved and conflict prone areas of the state. The EESP aims to improve security and reduce level of ethnic conflict in Eastern Equatoria State. The EESP contribute to the UNDAF outcome 4: “Violence is reduced and community security improved”. The participatory consultations and conflict mapping exercises that UNDP facilitated at county and state levels identified