DOCSLIB.ORG

Microsoft Word

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Microsoft Word Egypt Wegaf Khutawyre - Osorkon-I Sekhemkheperre 924-889 EARLY DYNASTIC PERIOD 3050-2686 Sobekhotep II Sekhemre-khutawy - Sheshonq II Heqakheperre 890 1st Dynasty 3050-2890 Iykhernefert Neferhotep - Takelot-I 889-874 Aha 3050-3020 Ameny-intef-amenemhat Sankhibre - Osorkon II Usermaatre 874-850 Djer 3020-2980 Hor Awybre - Takelot II Hedjkheperre 850-825 Djet 2980-2955 Khendjer Userkare - Sheshonq III Usermaatre 825-786 Den 2955-2935 Sobekhotep III Sekhemresewadjtawy - Sheshonq IV Hedjkheperre 786-773 Merneith, Queen Neferhotep-I Khasekhemre - Pami Usermaatre 773-767 Anedjib 2935-2925 Sahathor - Sheshonq V Aakheperre 767-730 Semerkhet 2925-2915 Sobekhotep IV Khaneferre - Osorkon IV Aakheperre 730-715 Qaa 2915-2890 Sobekhotep V - 23rd Dynasty - Tanite 818-715 2nd Dynasty 2890-2686 Ay Merneferre - Pedubastis-I Usermaatre 818-793 Hotepsekhemwy 2890-2850 14th Dynasty 1733-1650 Iuput-I 804-783 Reneb 2850-2810 Nehesy - Sheshonq IV Usermaatre 783-777 Nynetjer 2810-2770 Khatire - Osorkon III Usermaatre 777-740 Weneg 2770-2760 Takelot III Usermaatre 754-734 Sened 2760-2740 SECOND INTERMEDIATE PERIOD 1650-1550 Rudamon Usermaatre 734-731 Peribsen 2740-2720 15th Dynasty (Hyksos) 1650-1550 Iuput II Usermaatre 731-720 Sekhemib (=Peribsen?) 2720-2705 Salitis/Sekerher - Sheshonq VI 720-715 Khasekhemwy 2705-2686 Khyan Seuserenra 1600 24th Dynasty 727-715 Apepi Aauserra 1555 Tefnakht Shepsesre 727-720 OLD KINGDOM PERIOD 2686-2160 Khamudi - Bakenrenef (=Bocchoris) 720-715 3rd Dynasty 2686-2613 16th Dynasty 1650-1580 25th Dynasty 747-656 Sanakht/Nebka 2686-2667 Theban early rulers - Piye Menkheperra 747-716 Djoser/Zoser (=Netjerikhet) 2667-2648 17th Dynasty 1580-1550 Shabaqo Neferkara 716-702 Sekhemkhet 2648-2640 Rahotep - Shebitqo Djedkaure 702-690 Khaba 2640-2637 Sobekemsaf I - Taharqa Khunefertemre 690-664 Huni 2637-2613 Intef VI Sekhemre - Tanutamani Bakare 664-656 4th Dynasty 2613-2494 Intef VII Nubkheperre - LATE PERIOD 664-332 Sneferu 2613-2589 Intef VIII Sekhemraherhermaat - 26th Dynasty 664-525 Khufu (=Cheops) 2589-2566 Sobekemsaf II - Necho-I (=Nekau I) 672-664 Djedefre 2566-2558 Siamun (?) - Psamtek-I Wahibre 664-610 Khafre (=Chephren) 2558-2532 Taa II Senakhtenre/Seqenenre 1560 Necho II (=Nekau II) Wehemibre 610-595 Menkaure (=Mycerinus) 2532-2503 Kamose Wadjkheperre 1555-1550 Psamtek II Neferibre 595-589 Shepseskaf 2503-2498 NEW KINGDOM PERIOD 1550-1069 Apries Haaibre 589-570 5th Dynasty 2494-2345 18th Dynasty 1550-1295 Ahmose II (=Amasis II) Khnemibre 570-526 Userkaf 2494-2487 Ahmose-I (=Amasis I) Nebpehtyre 1550-1525 Psamtek III Ankhkaenre 526-525 Sahure 2487-2475 Amenhotep-I Djeserkara 1525-1504 27th Dynasty (Persian) 525-404 Neferirkare 2475-2455 Thutmose-I Aakheperkare 1504-1492 Cambyses II 525-522 Shepseskara 2455-2448 Thutmose II Aakheperenre 1492-1479 Darius I 522-486 Raneferef 2448-2445 Thutmose III Menkheperre 1479-1425 Xerxes I 486-465 Nyuserre 2445-2421 Hatshepsut Maatkare, Queen 1473-1458 Artaxerxes-I Macrocheir 465-424 Menkauhor 2421-2414 Amenhotep II Aakheperure 1427-1400 Darius II Nothus 424-404 Djedkare 2414-2375 Thutmose IV Menkheperure 1400-1390 Artaxerxes II Mnemon 404-358 Unas 2375-2345 Amenhotep III Nebmaatre 1390-1352 28th Dynasty 404-399 6th Dynasty 2345-2181 Amenhotep IV/Akhenaten 1352-1336 Amyrtaeus 404-399 Teti 2345-2323 Neferkheperurawaenra 29th Dynasty 399-380 Userkare 2323-2321 Smenkhkara Neferneferuaten 1338-1336 Nepherites (=Nefaarud) I 399-393 Pepi-I Meryre 2321-2287 Tutankhamun Nebkheperure 1336-1327 Psammuthes 393 Merenra I 2287-2278 Ay Kheperkheperure 1327-1323 Hakor (=Achoris) Khnemmaatra 393-380 Pepi II Neferkare 2278-2184 Horemheb Djeserkheperure 1323-1295 Nepherites (=Nefaarud) II 380 Merenra II 2184 19th Dynasty 1295-1186 30th Dynasty 380-343 Nitiqret, Queen 2184-2181 Rameses-I Menpehtyre 1295-1294 Nectanebo-I Kheperkare 380-362 7th and 8th Dynasties 2181-2160 Seti-I Menmaatre 1294-1279 Teos (=Tachos) 362-360 Numerous kings - Rameses II Usermaatre Setepenre 1279-1213 Nectanebo II Senedjemibre 360-343 Merenptah Baenre 1213-1203 31st Dynasty (Persian) 343-332 FIRST INTERMEDIATE PERIOD 2160-2055 Amenmesse Menmire 1203-1200 Artaxerxes III Ochus 343-338 9th and 10th Dynasties 2160-2025 Seti II Userkheperure Setepenre 1200-1194 Artaxerxes IV Arses 338-336 Khety-I Meribre - Siptah Sekhaenre Akheperre 1194-1188 Darius III Codomannus 336-332 Khety II Nebkaure - Tausret Sitrameritamun, Queen 1188-1186 Khety III Wahkare - 20th Dynasty 1186-1069 GREEK PERIOD 332-030 Merikare - Sethnakht Userkhaure 1186-1184 Macedonian Dynasty 332-305 11th Dynasty (Thebes only) 2125-2055 Rameses III Usermaatre 1184-1153 Alexander III the Great 332-323 Mentuhotep (I) - Rameses IV Heqamaatre 1153-1147 Philip III Arrhidaeus 323-317 Intef-I Seherutawy 2125-2112 Rameses V Usermaatre 1147-1143 Alexander IV Aegus 317-310 Intef II Wahankh 2122-2063 Rameses VI Nebmaatre 1143-1136 Ptolemaic Dynasty 305-030 Intef III Nakhtnebtephnefer 2063-2055 Rameses VII Usermaatre 1136-1129 Ptolemy-I Soter I 305-285 Rameses VIII Usermaatre 1129-1126 Ptolemy II Philadelphus 285-246 MIDDLE KINGDOM PERIOD 2055-1650 Rameses IX Neferkare 1126-1108 Ptolemy III Euergetes I 246-221 11th Dynasty (all Egypt) 2055-1985 Rameses X Khepermaatre 1108-1099 Ptolemy IV Philopator 221-205 Mentuhotep II Nebhepetre 2055-2004 Rameses XI Menmaatre 1099-1069 Ptolemy V Epiphanes 210-180 Mentuhotep III Sankhkare 2004-1992 Ptolemy VI Philometor 180-164; 163-145 Mentuhotep IV Nebtawyre 1992-1985 THIRD INTERMEDIATE PERIOD 1069-0664 Ptolemy VII Neos Philopator 145-144 12th Dynasty 1985-1733 21st Dynasty - Tanite 1069-0945 Ptolemy VIII Euergetes II 170-163; 145-116 Amenemhat-I Sehetepibre 1985-1956 Smendes Hedjkheperre 1069-1043 Ptolemy IX Soter II Lathyrus 116-107; 088-080 Senusret-I Kheperkare 1956-1911 Amenemnisu Neferkare 1043-1039 Ptolemy X Alexander I 110,109; 107-088 Amenemhat II Nubkaure 1911-1877 Psusennes-I (=Pasebakhaenniut I) 1039-0991 Ptolemy XI Alexander II 80 Senusret II Khakheperre 1877-1870 Amenemope Usermaatre 993-984 Ptolemy XII Neos Dionysos 80-58; 55-51 Senusret III Khakaure 1870-1831 Osorkon the Elder Akheperre 984-978 Ptolemy XIII Theos Philopator I 51-47 Amenemhat III Nimaatre 1831-1786 Siamun Netjerkheperre 978-959 Cleopatra VII Philopator 51-30 Amenemhat IV Maakherure 1786-1777 Psusennes II (=Pasebakhaenniut II) 959-945 Arsinoe IV 48-47 Sobekneferu, Queen 1777-1773 22nd Dynasty - Bubastite 945-715 Ptolemy XIV Theos Philopator II 47-44 13th Dynasty 1773-after 1650 Sheshonq-I Hedjkheperre 945-924 Ptolemy XV Caesarion 44-30 © antiquityplus.com 2018 2085 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Satrap of Western Anatolia and the Greeks
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Eyal Meyer University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation Meyer, Eyal, "The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2473. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Abstract This dissertation explores the extent to which Persian policies in the western satrapies originated from the provincial capitals in the Anatolian periphery rather than from the royal centers in the Persian heartland in the fifth ec ntury BC. I begin by establishing that the Persian administrative apparatus was a product of a grand reform initiated by Darius I, which was aimed at producing a more uniform and centralized administrative infrastructure. In the following chapter I show that the provincial administration was embedded with chancellors, scribes, secretaries and military personnel of royal status and that the satrapies were periodically inspected by the Persian King or his loyal agents, which allowed to central authorities to monitory the provinces. In chapter three I delineate the extent of satrapal authority, responsibility and resources, and conclude that the satraps were supplied with considerable resources which enabled to fulfill the duties of their office. After the power dynamic between the Great Persian King and his provincial governors and the nature of the office of satrap has been analyzed, I begin a diachronic scrutiny of Greco-Persian interactions in the fifth century BC.
    [Show full text]
  • Macedonian Kings, Egyptian Pharaohs the Ptolemaic Family In
    Department of World Cultures University of Helsinki Helsinki Macedonian Kings, Egyptian Pharaohs The Ptolemaic Family in the Encomiastic Poems of Callimachus Iiro Laukola ACADEMIC DISSERTATION To be publicly discussed, by due permission of the Faculty of Arts at the University of Helsinki in auditorium XV, University Main Building, on the 23rd of September, 2016 at 12 o’clock. Helsinki 2016 © Iiro Laukola 2016 ISBN 978-951-51-2383-1 (paperback.) ISBN 978-951-51-2384-8 (PDF) Unigrafia Helsinki 2016 Abstract The interaction between Greek and Egyptian cultural concepts has been an intense yet controversial topic in studies about Ptolemaic Egypt. The present study partakes in this discussion with an analysis of the encomiastic poems of Callimachus of Cyrene (c. 305 – c. 240 BC). The success of the Ptolemaic Dynasty is crystallized in the juxtaposing of the different roles of a Greek ǴdzȅǻǽǷȏȄ and of an Egyptian Pharaoh, and this study gives a glimpse of this political and ideological endeavour through the poetry of Callimachus. The contribution of the present work is to situate Callimachus in the core of the Ptolemaic court. Callimachus was a proponent of the Ptolemaic rule. By reappraising the traditional Greek beliefs, he examined the bicultural rule of the Ptolemies in his encomiastic poems. This work critically examines six Callimachean hymns, namely to Zeus, to Apollo, to Artemis, to Delos, to Athena and to Demeter together with the Victory of Berenice, the Lock of Berenice and the Ektheosis of Arsinoe. Characterized by ambiguous imagery, the hymns inspect the ruptures in Greek thought during the Hellenistic age.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Ancient Egypt “Passionate, Erudite, Living Legend Lecturers
    “Pure intellectual stimulation that can be popped into Topic Subtopic the [audio or video player] anytime.” History Ancient History —Harvard Magazine The History of Ancient Egypt “Passionate, erudite, living legend lecturers. Academia’s best lecturers are being captured on tape.” —The Los Angeles Times The History “A serious force in American education.” —The Wall Street Journal of Ancient Egypt Course Guidebook Professor Bob Brier Long Island University Professor Bob Brier is an Egyptologist and Professor of Philosophy at the C. W. Post Campus of Long Island University. He is renowned for his insights into ancient Egypt. He hosts The Learning Channel’s popular Great Egyptians series, and his research was the subject of the National Geographic television special Mr. Mummy. A dynamic instructor, Professor Brier has received Long Island University’s David Newton Award for Teaching Excellence. THE GREAT COURSES® Corporate Headquarters 4840 Westfields Boulevard, Suite 500 Chantilly, VA 20151-2299 Guidebook USA Phone: 1-800-832-2412 www.thegreatcourses.com Cover Image: © Hemera/Thinkstock. Course No. 350 © 1999 The Teaching Company. PB350A PUBLISHED BY: THE GREAT COURSES Corporate Headquarters 4840 Westfi elds Boulevard, Suite 500 Chantilly, Virginia 20151-2299 Phone: 1-800-TEACH-12 Fax: 703-378-3819 www.thegreatcourses.com Copyright © The Teaching Company, 1999 Printed in the United States of America This book is in copyright. All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form, or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), without the prior written permission of The Teaching Company.
    [Show full text]
  • Seeing Oursel Es in the Xenoi – Plato's Warning to the Greeks
    Akropolis 3 (2019) 129-149 Marina Marren* Seeing Ourseles in the Xenoi – Plato’s Warning to the Greeks Abstract: In this essay about the story of Atlantis in Plato’s Timaeus, we focus on the crucial political message that the Atlantis tale contains. More precisely, we seek to respond to a question that may evade a completely satisfactory answer. The question is: Could Plato’s story of the rise and fall of Atlantis, in the Timaeus, be a warning tale to the Greeks of his own time? In order to root the inves- tigation prompted by this question in solid textual ground, we pay close attention to the framing of the Atlantis tale. In what follows, we analyze the series of substitutions (between mythical, ancient, and historical cities, i.e., Atlantis, Athens, and Sais) that Plato uses as he seeks to bring his readers to a point from which we can assess the politics of ancient Athens – a city that in Plato’s time stands on the brink of repeating the political blunders of the formerly glorious empire of the East. Introduction In the spirit of the tradition that takes Plato’s dialogues to be both works of literary genius and of philosophy, we pay careful attention to Plato’s narrative frames and to his choice of interlocutors in order to tease out the philosoph- ical and political recommendations that Plato has for his ancient readers and that his dialogues offer to us. To that end, in Section II, we focus on providing philosophically pertinent details related to the identity and ambitions of Critias IV who, on our interpretation, is the narrator of the Atlantis story.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Evidence: Exodus Lesson 1 – Timeline Watch First 20 Minutes
    Patterns of Evidence: Exodus Lesson 1 – Timeline Watch first 20 minutes on Right Now media Exodus Story – Biblical Summary ◦ Joseph moved his family to Egypt during the 7-year famine ◦ Israelites lived in the land of Goshen ◦ Years after Joseph died, a new pharaoh became fearful of the large numbers of Israelites. ◦ Israelites became slaves ◦ Moses was 80 when God sent him to Egypt to free the Israelites ◦ After Passover, the Israelites wandered in the desert for 40 years ◦ Israelites conquered the Promised Land An Overview of Egyptian History Problems with Egyptian History ◦ Historians began with multiple lists of Pharaoh’s names carved on temple walls ◦ These lists are incomplete, sometimes skipping Pharaohs ◦ Once a “standard” list had been made, then they looked at other known histories and inserted the list ◦ These dates then became the accepted timeline Evidence for the Late Date – 1250 BC • Genesis 47:11-12 • Exodus 18-14 • Earliest archaeological recording of the Israelites dates to 1210 BC on the Merneptah Stele o Must be before that time o Merneptah was the son of Ramses II • Ten Commandments and Prince of Egypt Movies take the Late Date with Ramses II Evidence for the Early Date – 1440 BC • “From Abraham to Paul: A Biblical Chronology” by Andrew Steinmann • 1 Kings 6:1 – Solomon began building temple 480 years after the Exodus o Solomon’s reign began 971 BC and began building temple in 967 BC o Puts Exodus date at 1447 BC • 1 Chronicles 6 lists 19 generations from Exodus to Solomon o Assume 25 years per generation – Exodus occurred
    [Show full text]
  • Nilotic Livestock Transport in Ancient Egypt
    NILOTIC LIVESTOCK TRANSPORT IN ANCIENT EGYPT A Thesis by MEGAN CHRISTINE HAGSETH Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Chair of Committee, Shelley Wachsmann Committee Members, Deborah Carlson Kevin Glowacki Head of Department, Cynthia Werner December 2015 Major Subject: Anthropology Copyright 2015 Megan Christine Hagseth ABSTRACT Cattle in ancient Egypt were a measure of wealth and prestige, and as such figured prominently in tomb art, inscriptions, and even literature. Elite titles and roles such as “Overseer of Cattle” were granted to high ranking officials or nobility during the New Kingdom, and large numbers of cattle were collected as tribute throughout the Pharaonic period. The movement of these animals along the Nile, whether for secular or sacred reasons, required the development of specialized vessels. The cattle ferries of ancient Egypt provide a unique opportunity to understand facets of the Egyptian maritime community. A comparison of cattle barges with other Egyptian ship types from these same periods leads to a better understand how these vessels fit into the larger maritime paradigm, and also serves to test the plausibility of aspects such as vessel size and design, composition of crew, and lading strategies. Examples of cargo vessels similar to the cattle barge have been found and excavated, such as ships from Thonis-Heracleion, Ayn Sukhna, Alexandria, and Mersa/Wadi Gawasis. This type of cross analysis allows for the tentative reconstruction of a vessel type which has not been identified previously in the archaeological record.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Cyprus: Island of Conflict?
    Ancient Cyprus: Island of Conflict? Maria Natasha Ioannou Thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy Discipline of Classics School of Humanities The University of Adelaide December 2012 Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................ III Declaration........................................................................................................... IV Acknowledgements ............................................................................................. V Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 1. Overview .......................................................................................................... 1 2. Background and Context ................................................................................. 1 3. Thesis Aims ..................................................................................................... 3 4. Thesis Summary .............................................................................................. 4 5. Literature Review ............................................................................................. 6 Chapter 1: Cyprus Considered .......................................................................... 14 1.1 Cyprus’ Internal Dynamics ........................................................................... 15 1.2 Cyprus, Phoenicia and Egypt .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Egyptian Chronology.Pdf
    Ancient Egyptian Chronology HANDBOOK OF ORIENTAL STUDIES SECTION ONE THE NEAR AND MIDDLE EAST Ancient Near East Editor-in-Chief W. H. van Soldt Editors G. Beckman • C. Leitz • B. A. Levine P. Michalowski • P. Miglus Middle East R. S. O’Fahey • C. H. M. Versteegh VOLUME EIGHTY-THREE Ancient Egyptian Chronology Edited by Erik Hornung, Rolf Krauss, and David A. Warburton BRILL LEIDEN • BOSTON 2006 This book is printed on acid-free paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Ancient Egyptian chronology / edited by Erik Hornung, Rolf Krauss, and David A. Warburton; with the assistance of Marianne Eaton-Krauss. p. cm. — (Handbook of Oriental studies. Section 1, The Near and Middle East ; v. 83) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-90-04-11385-5 ISBN-10: 90-04-11385-1 1. Egypt—History—To 332 B.C.—Chronology. 2. Chronology, Egyptian. 3. Egypt—Antiquities. I. Hornung, Erik. II. Krauss, Rolf. III. Warburton, David. IV. Eaton-Krauss, Marianne. DT83.A6564 2006 932.002'02—dc22 2006049915 ISSN 0169-9423 ISBN-10 90 04 11385 1 ISBN-13 978 90 04 11385 5 © Copyright 2006 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Hotei Publishing, IDC Publishers, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, and VSP. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Brill provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, MA 01923, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Extraction and Use of Greywacke in Ancient Egypt Ahmed Ibrahim Othman
    JFTH, Vol. 14, Issue 1 (2017) ISSN: 2314-7024 Extraction and Use of Greywacke in Ancient Egypt Ahmed Ibrahim Othman 1 Lecturer – Tourism Guidance Department Hotel Management and Restoration Institute, Abu Qir. [ Introduction The Quseir – Qift road was the only practical route in the Central Easter Desert as it was the shortest and easiest road from the Nile Valley to the Red Sea, in addition to the richness of the Bekhen stone quarries and the gold mines. Therefore, it was the preferred road by the merchants, quarrymen and miners. The Bekhen stone quarries of Wadi Hammamat forms an archaeological cluster of inscriptions, unfinished manufactures, settlements, workshops and remaining tools. It seems clear that the state was responsible for the Bekhen stone exploitation, given the vast amount of resources that had to be invested in the organization of a quarrying expedition. Unlike the other marginal areas, the officials leading the missions to Wadi Hammamat show different affiliations in terms of administrative branches. This is probably because Bekhen stone procurement was not the responsibility of the treasury, but these expeditions were entrusted to separate competent officials, graded in a specific hierarchy, forming well – organized missions with different workers for different duties and established wages and functionaries in charge of the administrative tasks. The greywacke quarries were not constantly or intensively exploited. The fact that the stone was used in private or royal statuary and not as a building stone could have caused its demand to be less than that of other materials such as granite, limestone or sandstone. Inscriptions indicated the time lapse between expeditions suggesting that this stone was only quarried when it was needed, which was not on a regular basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Egyptian Chronology and the Book of Genesis
    Answers Research Journal 4 (2011):127–159. www.answersingenesis.org/arj/v4/ancient-egyptian-chronology-genesis.pdf Ancient Egyptian Chronology and the Book of Genesis Matt McClellan, [email protected] Abstract One of the most popular topics among young earth creationists and apologists is the relationship of the Bible with Ancient Egyptian chronology. Whether it concerns who the pharaoh of the Exodus was, the background of Joseph, or the identity of Shishak, many Christians (and non-Christians) have wondered how these two topics fit together. This paper deals with the question, “How does ancient Egyptian chronology correlate with the book of Genesis?” In answering this question it begins with an analysis of every Egyptian dynasty starting with the 12th Dynasty (this is where David Down places Moses) and goes back all the way to the so called “Dynasty 0.” After all the data is presented, this paper will look at the different possibilities that can be constructed concerning how long each of these dynasties lasted and how they relate to the biblical dates of the Great Flood, the Tower of Babel, and the Patriarchs. Keywords: Egypt, pharaoh, Patriarchs, chronology, Abraham, Joseph Introduction Kingdom) need to be revised. This is important During the past century some scholars have when considering the relationship between Egyptian proposed new ways of dating the events of ancient history and the Tower of Babel. The traditional dating history before c. 700 BC.1 In 1991 a book entitled of Ancient Egyptian chronology places its earliest Centuries of Darkness by Peter James and four of dynasties before the biblical dates of the Flood and his colleagues shook the very foundations of ancient confusion of the languages at Babel.
    [Show full text]
  • Who's Who in Ancient Egypt
    Who’s Who IN ANCIENT EGYPT Available from Routledge worldwide: Who’s Who in Ancient Egypt Michael Rice Who’s Who in the Ancient Near East Gwendolyn Leick Who’s Who in Classical Mythology Michael Grant and John Hazel Who’s Who in World Politics Alan Palmer Who’s Who in Dickens Donald Hawes Who’s Who in Jewish History Joan Comay, new edition revised by Lavinia Cohn-Sherbok Who’s Who in Military History John Keegan and Andrew Wheatcroft Who’s Who in Nazi Germany Robert S.Wistrich Who’s Who in the New Testament Ronald Brownrigg Who’s Who in Non-Classical Mythology Egerton Sykes, new edition revised by Alan Kendall Who’s Who in the Old Testament Joan Comay Who’s Who in Russia since 1900 Martin McCauley Who’s Who in Shakespeare Peter Quennell and Hamish Johnson Who’s Who in World War Two Edited by John Keegan Who’s Who IN ANCIENT EGYPT Michael Rice 0 London and New York First published 1999 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2004. © 1999 Michael Rice The right of Michael Rice to be identified as the Author of this Work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin of the Pentateuch in the Light of the Ancient Monuments
    THE Gil OF THE PIT IN THE Light of the Ancient Monuments. HENRY ALEXANDER WHITE, M. A., Pli. D., D. D. Professor of History in the Washington and Lee University, Lexington, Virginia. RICHMOND, VA.: B. F. Johnson Publishing Company. 1894. Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1894, by HENRY ALEXANDER WHITE, In the office of the Librarian of Congress at Washington. This Volume is Dedicated TO My Wife. ;; PREFACE. THE greater part of this volume, in the form of lectures, has been given, during several sessions, to my class in Bible History. The reader of these lectures should keep constantly before his eyes the open pages of the sacred narrative itself. It is hoped that they may be found available in connection with the study of the English Bible as a text- book of history in our colleges and universities. The best literature available on the various subjects has been con- sulted. Reference to some of these authorities has been made in the foot-notes. Special acknowledgment must be rendered, in the line of Egyptian and Babylonian history to Brugsch's Egypt Under the Pharaohs (Scribner's) ; Renouf's Religion of Ancient Egypt; Budge's Dwellers on the Nile ; Rawlinson's Ancient Egypt ; his Great Monarchies, and his Origin of Nations ; Wilkinson's Ancient Egyptians ; Kenrick's Egypt the publications of Ebers ; Fergusson on Egyptian Architecture ; Daw- son's Egypt and Syria; Smith's Ancient History of the East; Sayce's Ancient Empires of the East ; his Fresh Light from the Ancient Monu- ments, and his Assyria, its Princes, Priests and People ; Budge's Baby- lonian Life and History ; Layard's Nineveh and Babylon ; Keary's Dawn of History, and the various encyclopedias and publications of the Pales- tine and Egyptian Exploration Funds.
    [Show full text]