arXiv:1002.3856v1 [math.CA] 20 Feb 2010 n[1 p 0–0] yconsidering by 105–106], pp. [11, In ψ h first the am ucinΓ( function gamma e 1 .28 ..] where 6.3.2], 258, p. [1, see scle amncsre.The series. harmonic called is constant. sity. ( x h series The 2000 n[7,tes-aldFae’ nqaiyi ieauewsgvnby given was literature in inequality Franel’s so-called the [17], In e od n phrases. and words Key h uhr eespotdi atb h cec Foundation Science the by part in supported were authors The hspprwstpstusing typeset was paper This eoe h s ucin h oaihi derivative logarithmic the function, psi the denotes ) ahmtc ujc Classification. Subject Mathematics e hr obeieult o onighroi ubr a numbers harmonic bounding for n inequality the double and constant, sharp Euler-Mascheroni new or numbers harmonic ing Abstract. svld iheult ntelf-adsd nywhen only side left-hand the in equality with valid, is 2(7 n ∈ 2 em ftehroi eis a egvnaayial by analytically given be may series, harmonic the of terms − γ − HR ONSFRHROI NUMBERS HARMONIC FOR BOUNDS SHARP N − 12 12 h obeinequality double the , 1 γ n ) 2 and 2(7 + nteppr efis uvysm eut nieulte for inequalities on results some survey first we paper, the In 2 x 1 n 5 6 hc a edfie by defined be may which ) I n r h etpossible. best the are − − 1 = 12 amncnme,pifnto,sapieult,Euler-Ma inequality, sharp function, psi number, harmonic 8 Γ( H n 1 γ Z ) x 2 1 / ( A + 1 EGQ N A-IGUO BAI-NI AND QI FENG γ /n 1 = ) (2 n H < M = ) 0 = γ n S 1. t amncnumber harmonic -th − 2 1 Z -L x 1 A ( 0 1) X + . i n T Introduction − ∞ 57721566 =1 n E ) ≤ X. 3 1 t − x 1 i rmr 61;Scnay33B15. Secondary 26D15; Primary x 1 H + − ln = ( 1 1 · · · n e n ) − γ d − − t + + · · · x d ln < γ n ψ ,x> x t, 1 ln = n ( sElrMshrn osatand constant Euler-Mascheroni is + − n 2 1) + · · · 2 1 n 1 n n − n , n − H 0 ,weetescalars the where 1, = , H < γ . ( fTajnPltcncUniver- Polytechnic Tianjin of Γ Γ( n ′ ( ( for ) n x ∈ x − ) ) (5) ) eetbiha establish we n N 12 ftecasclEuler classical the of olw:For follows: s . n n 2 1 ∈ 6 + bound- N / 5 h u of sum the , scheroni (4) (2) (1) (3) 2 F. QI AND B.-N. GUO
1 and 0 < In < 2 , where [t] denotes the largest integer less tan or equal to t, it was established that 1
q−1 ∞ 1 1 B B (x) H(n) = ln n + γ + 2i 2q d x (13) 2n − 2 in2i − Z x2q Xi=1 n and ∞ q B2q−1(x) ( 1) B2q 2q d x< − 2q , (14) Zn x 2qn where n and q are positive integers, Bi(x) are Bernoulli polynomials and B2i = B2i(0) denote Bernoulli numbers for i N. For definitions of Bi(x) and B2i, please refer to [1, p. 804]. ∈ In [23], the inequality (10) was verified again by calculus. SHARPBOUNDSFORHARMONICNUMBERS 3
In [13], by utilizing Euler-Maclaurin summation formula, the following general result was obtained: m 1 1 1 B − 1 H(n) = ln n + γ + + 2(i 1) + O . (15) 2n − 12n2 2 (i 1)n2(i−1) n2m Xi=3 − See also [15, p. 77]. In fact, this is equivalent to the formula in [1, p. 259, 6.3.18]. In [22], by considering the decreasing monotonicity of the sequence 1 xn = ∞ 2n, (16) ( 1)k−1 1 − k=n+1 − k it was shown that the best constants P a and b such that ∞ 1 k−1 1 1 ( 1) < (17) 2n + a ≤ − k 2n + b k=Xn+1 for n 1 are a = 1 2 and b = 1. ≥ 1−ln 2 − In [4, Theorem 2.8] and [19], alternative sharp bounds for H(n) were presented: For n N, ∈ 1 + ln √e 1 ln e1/(n+1) 1 H(n) <γ ln e1/(n+1) 1 . (18) − − − ≤ − − The constants 1 + ln √e 1 and γ in (18) are the best possible. This improves − the result in [3, pp. 386–387]. In [20], it was established that
1 − ln n + + γ