Euler's Constant: New Insights by Means of Minus One Factorial

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Euler's Constant: New Insights by Means of Minus One Factorial Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2014 Vol II, WCE 2014, July 2 - 4, 2014, London, U.K. Euler’s Constant: New Insights by Means of Minus One Factorial Okoh Ufuoma Abstract—The great object of this paper is to furnish, in German mathematician Johann Carl Friedrich Gauss (1777– a concise and plain manner, new insights into that mysterious 1855), evaluated γ up to 40 correct decimal places in accor- constant whose arithmetic nature was shrouded in obscurity dance with Soldner’s value [6], [15], [32]. for over 250 years, the famous Euler’s constant. The cardinal The constant whose numerical value is γ = instrument which generates these new insights is the unwonted 0:577215664 ::: [14], [23], a real number, forms a triple infinite number, the minus one factorial, which in this paper is constant with two famous and important real constants, discussed in detail. π = 3:141592653 ::: and e = 2:718281828 ::: as it is often ranked the third most important real constant after π and e Index Terms—Euler’s constant, infinity, harmonic number, [6], [14], not based on its position in respect of magnitude, harmonic series, natural logarithm, minus one factorial for example, π > e > γ, but depending on its position with regard to its ubiquity in mathematics, revealed by its frequent I. INTRODUCTION appearance in equations. Of the triple constant it is only γ NE of the most enchanting mathematical discoveries of whose arithmetic nature was an enigma to mathematicians O the 18th century was the mysterious and celebrated as its irrationality and transcendence were unfathomable for constant, the Euler’s constant γ, discovered by the immor- many years [14] . The irrationality of π and e was proved by a tal Swiss professor in mathematics in Berlin and St Peters- Swiss mathematician Johann Heinrich Lambert (1728–1777) burg, Leonhard Euler (1707-1783) [23], who, in his ad- in 1761 and that of eπ by a Soviet mathematician Alexander mirable paper titled De progressionibus harmonics observa- Osipovich Gelfond (1906–1968) in 1929 [16]. tiones (1734/5) [10], defined the constant in a fascinating The main aim of this paper is to provide new insights into manner as the character of γ by means of the minus one factorial (−1)! 1 1 1 1 together with other relevant results which we shall also con- γ = lim 1 + + + + ··· + − ln(n + 1) n!1 2 3 4 n sider in this paper. We shall here employ (−1)! to derive, in a systematic manner, a new and beautiful expression for γ. and computed its numerical value to 6 decimal places as The rest of the paper is structured into seven sections. Sec- tion II provides, for the reader to evince enthusiastic interest γ = 0:577218: in the paper, a brief review of Euler’s quest for the arithmetic In the 1st section of another paper entirely devoted to the in- nature of γ. Section III introduces the new and unfamiliar vestigation of γ and intriguingly entitled De numero memo- constant (−1)! while Section IV elegantly treats its arithmetic rabili in summatione progressionis harmonicae naturalis oc- nature. Section V discusses precise details of the harmonic currente [11] [20], Euler painstakingly computed the value of number and the natural logarithm, the two concomitants re- the constant to 16 decimal places as sponsible for the creation of the Euler’s constant. Section VI introduces for the first time the natural logarithm of (−1)! γ = 0:5772156649015325: as the sum of the divergent harmonic series. That the reader may see the great beauty and force of the new constant (−1)!, The constant is sometimes called Euler–Mascheroni Section VII treats the use of the natural logarithm of (−1)! for constant [22] to honour together with Euler the Italian deriving a familiar formula that links the Euler’s constant with mathematician Lorenzo Mascheroni (1750–1800) [6], prob- the famous Riemann zeta constants. Finally, Section VIII pro- ably the second to intensively investigate the constant. In vides for the first time a new and interesting identity that for- Adnotationes ad calculum 1790 Mascheroni published his ever links γ with (−1)!. integralem Euleri [6], [14] and there computed γ up to 32 decimal places, denoting it with the letter A. A few years II. EULER’S QUEST FOR THE ARITHMETIC later, in 1809, a German mathematician, Johann Georg von NATURE OF γ Soldner (1766–1833) found a value of the constant which The discovery of the Euler’s constant, γ, originated from a was in harmony with only the first 19 decimal places of famous problem, the Basel problem, posed in the 17th century Mascheroni’s computed value. It was in 1812 that a young in a 1650 book Novae Quadraturea Arithmeticae by a profes- prodigious mathematician Friedrich Bernhard Gottfried sor of mechanics in Bologna, Pietro Mengoli (1625 − 1686), Nicolai (1793–1846), under the supervision of the famous an Italian mathematician and clergyman [1]. The Basel prob- lem asked for the exact sum of the series 1 Manuscript received Feb. 12, 2014; revised March 1, 2014. Okoh X 1 1 1 1 Ufuoma is with the Department of Mathematics/Science, Apex Academy, = lim 1 + + + ··· + n2 n!1 22 32 n2 Uwheru, Delta State, Nigeria (tel: 08134813234; e-mail: okohu- n=1 [email protected], [email protected]) together with a proof that the sum was precise [1], [14]. ISBN: 978-988-19253-5-0 WCE 2014 ISSN: 2078-0958 (Print); ISSN: 2078-0966 (Online) Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2014 Vol II, WCE The2014, eminent July 2 - English 4, 2014, mathematician London, U.K. and professor at Ox- tain the following tabular form: ford John Wallis (1616–1703) had communicated in his 1655 1 1 1 1 book Arithmetica Infinitorum that he had got the sum to three 1 = ln (2) + − + − + ··· decimal places as 1:645, but he was unable to say anything 2 3 4 5 1 3 1 1 1 1 more concrete [1]. The problem became notable because it = ln + − + − + ··· was also raised by one of the eight prominent mathematicians 2 2 2 · 4 3 · 8 4 · 16 5 · 32 produced by a remarkable Swiss family in three generations, 1 4 1 1 1 1 = ln + − + − + ··· Jakob Bernoulli (1654 − 1705), a professor of mathematics 3 3 2 · 9 3 · 27 4 · 81 5 · 243 at the University in Basel. He attempted the problem with- . out success, and in his posthumous book, the illustrious Ars . Conjectandi, published in 1713, he appealed [4], [20]: 1 n + 1 1 1 1 1 = ln + − + − + ··· : n n 2 · n2 3 · n3 4 · n4 5 · n5 ::: it is more difficult than one would have ex- pected, which is noteworthy. If someone should Adding by columns the first n terms, we get succeed in finding what till now withstood our ef- 1 1 1 forts and communicate it to us, we would be much 1 + + + ··· + = ln(n + 1) 2 3 n obliged to them. 1 1 1 1 + 1 + + + ··· + 2 4 9 n2 This problem prompted Euler’s research and he spent 1 1 1 1 much effort evaluating the sum of reciprocals of powers − 1 + + + ··· + 3 which in modern notation is written as 3 8 27 n 1 1 1 1 + 1 + + + ··· + 1 4 16 81 n4 X 1 ζ(k) = ; k ≥ 1 1 1 1 1 nk − 1 + + + ··· + n=1 5 32 243 n5 + ··· : where ζ(k) is a zeta constant. In 1735 he obtained the exact sum 1 1 If n tends to the infinitely large integer Ω so that 1 + 2 + 3 + ··· + 1 becomes the harmonic series, we have π2 n ζ(2) = 6 1 1 1 1 + + + ··· + = ln(Ω + 1) + γ 2 3 Ω and announced his noteworthy solution to the Basel problem where [1], [14]. He also procured the exact values for higher even zeta constants ζ(2m), but did not succeed in finding the exact 1 1 1 1 γ = 1 + + + ··· + value for any odd zeta constant ζ(2m − 1). In a letter to his 2 4 9 Ω2 tutor, the notable Johann Bernoulli (1667– 1748), the younger 1 1 1 1 brother of Jakob, he wrote, “::: the odd powers I cannot sum, − 1 + + + ··· + 3 8 27 Ω3 and I don’t believe that their sums depend on the quadrature 1 1 1 1 of the circle [π] ”[14]. + 1 + + + ··· + In an attempt to assign a value to the odd zeta constant 4 16 81 Ω4 ζ(1), also called the harmonic series, he discovered his fa- 1 1 1 1 − 1 + + + ··· + vorite constant which we now call the Euler’s constant γ, 5 32 243 Ω5 computed it to six decimal places and published his results in + ··· the paper [10], and there denoted his constant with the letter 1 1 1 1 C, stating that it was “worthy of serious consideration”[17]. = ζ(2) − ζ(3) + ζ(4) − ζ(5) + ··· Now the birth of Euler’s constant as Euler presented it in 2 3 4 5 1 π2 1 1 π4 his paper [10] is as follows: We start with the Taylor series = − (1:202056903 :::) + − · · · expansion of ln(1 + x), 2 6 3 4 90 = 0:577215664 :::: x2 x3 x4 x5 ln(1 + x) = x − + − + − · · · ; 2 3 4 5 Euler, as was his custom, would never give up the search for anything he thought deserves serious consideration. He which was discovered by a 17th-century German mathemati- engaged himself with great ardor in a long search for the arith- cian Nicholas Mercator (c.1620–1687). We rearrange this se- metic nature of γ, desiring to know the sort of number it is, ries as whether or not it is irrational, incapable of being written as a ratio or quotient of two integers, and transcendental, inca- pable of being expressed as a polynomial.
Recommended publications
  • 18.01A Topic 5: Second Fundamental Theorem, Lnx As an Integral. Read
    18.01A Topic 5: Second fundamental theorem, ln x as an integral. Read: SN: PI, FT. 0 R b b First Fundamental Theorem: F = f ⇒ a f(x) dx = F (x)|a Questions: 1. Why dx? 2. Given f(x) does F (x) always exist? Answer to question 1. Pn R b a) Riemann sum: Area ≈ 1 f(ci)∆x → a f(x) dx In the limit the sum becomes an integral and the finite ∆x becomes the infinitesimal dx. b) The dx helps with change of variable. a b 1 Example: Compute R √ 1 dx. 0 1−x2 Let x = sin u. dx du = cos u ⇒ dx = cos u du, x = 0 ⇒ u = 0, x = 1 ⇒ u = π/2. 1 π/2 π/2 π/2 R √ 1 R √ 1 R cos u R Substituting: 2 dx = cos u du = du = du = π/2. 0 1−x 0 1−sin2 u 0 cos u 0 Answer to question 2. Yes → Second Fundamental Theorem: Z x If f is continuous and F (x) = f(u) du then F 0(x) = f(x). a I.e. f always has an anit-derivative. This is subtle: we have defined a NEW function F (x) using the definite integral. Note we needed a dummy variable u for integration because x was already taken. Z x+∆x f(x) proof: ∆area = f(x) dx 44 4 x Z x+∆x Z x o area = ∆F = f(x) dx − f(x) dx 0 0 = F (x + ∆x) − F (x) = ∆F. x x + ∆x ∆F But, also ∆area ≈ f(x) ∆x ⇒ ∆F ≈ f(x) ∆x or ≈ f(x).
    [Show full text]
  • The Enigmatic Number E: a History in Verse and Its Uses in the Mathematics Classroom
    To appear in MAA Loci: Convergence The Enigmatic Number e: A History in Verse and Its Uses in the Mathematics Classroom Sarah Glaz Department of Mathematics University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269 [email protected] Introduction In this article we present a history of e in verse—an annotated poem: The Enigmatic Number e . The annotation consists of hyperlinks leading to biographies of the mathematicians appearing in the poem, and to explanations of the mathematical notions and ideas presented in the poem. The intention is to celebrate the history of this venerable number in verse, and to put the mathematical ideas connected with it in historical and artistic context. The poem may also be used by educators in any mathematics course in which the number e appears, and those are as varied as e's multifaceted history. The sections following the poem provide suggestions and resources for the use of the poem as a pedagogical tool in a variety of mathematics courses. They also place these suggestions in the context of other efforts made by educators in this direction by briefly outlining the uses of historical mathematical poems for teaching mathematics at high-school and college level. Historical Background The number e is a newcomer to the mathematical pantheon of numbers denoted by letters: it made several indirect appearances in the 17 th and 18 th centuries, and acquired its letter designation only in 1731. Our history of e starts with John Napier (1550-1617) who defined logarithms through a process called dynamical analogy [1]. Napier aimed to simplify multiplication (and in the same time also simplify division and exponentiation), by finding a model which transforms multiplication into addition.
    [Show full text]
  • AND MARIO V. W ¨UTHRICH† This Year We Celebrate the 300Th
    BERNOULLI’S LAW OF LARGE NUMBERS BY ∗ ERWIN BOLTHAUSEN AND MARIO V. W UTHRICH¨ † ABSTRACT This year we celebrate the 300th anniversary of Jakob Bernoulli’s path-breaking work Ars conjectandi, which appeared in 1713, eight years after his death. In Part IV of his masterpiece, Bernoulli proves the law of large numbers which is one of the fundamental theorems in probability theory, statistics and actuarial science. We review and comment on his original proof. KEYWORDS Bernoulli, law of large numbers, LLN. 1. INTRODUCTION In a correspondence, Jakob Bernoulli writes to Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz in October 1703 [5]: “Obwohl aber seltsamerweise durch einen sonderbaren Na- turinstinkt auch jeder D¨ummste ohne irgend eine vorherige Unterweisung weiss, dass je mehr Beobachtungen gemacht werden, umso weniger die Gefahr besteht, dass man das Ziel verfehlt, ist es doch ganz und gar nicht Sache einer Laienun- tersuchung, dieses genau und geometrisch zu beweisen”, saying that anyone would guess that the more observations we have the less we can miss the target; however, a rigorous analysis and proof of this conjecture is not trivial at all. This extract refers to the law of large numbers. Furthermore, Bernoulli expresses that such thoughts are not new, but he is proud of being the first one who has given a rigorous mathematical proof to the statement of the law of large numbers. Bernoulli’s results are the foundations of the estimation and prediction theory that allows one to apply probability theory well beyond combinatorics. The law of large numbers is derived in Part IV of his centennial work Ars conjectandi, which appeared in 1713, eight years after his death (published by his nephew Nicolaus Bernoulli), see [1].
    [Show full text]
  • The Interpretation of Probability: Still an Open Issue? 1
    philosophies Article The Interpretation of Probability: Still an Open Issue? 1 Maria Carla Galavotti Department of Philosophy and Communication, University of Bologna, Via Zamboni 38, 40126 Bologna, Italy; [email protected] Received: 19 July 2017; Accepted: 19 August 2017; Published: 29 August 2017 Abstract: Probability as understood today, namely as a quantitative notion expressible by means of a function ranging in the interval between 0–1, took shape in the mid-17th century, and presents both a mathematical and a philosophical aspect. Of these two sides, the second is by far the most controversial, and fuels a heated debate, still ongoing. After a short historical sketch of the birth and developments of probability, its major interpretations are outlined, by referring to the work of their most prominent representatives. The final section addresses the question of whether any of such interpretations can presently be considered predominant, which is answered in the negative. Keywords: probability; classical theory; frequentism; logicism; subjectivism; propensity 1. A Long Story Made Short Probability, taken as a quantitative notion whose value ranges in the interval between 0 and 1, emerged around the middle of the 17th century thanks to the work of two leading French mathematicians: Blaise Pascal and Pierre Fermat. According to a well-known anecdote: “a problem about games of chance proposed to an austere Jansenist by a man of the world was the origin of the calculus of probabilities”2. The ‘man of the world’ was the French gentleman Chevalier de Méré, a conspicuous figure at the court of Louis XIV, who asked Pascal—the ‘austere Jansenist’—the solution to some questions regarding gambling, such as how many dice tosses are needed to have a fair chance to obtain a double-six, or how the players should divide the stakes if a game is interrupted.
    [Show full text]
  • Applications of the Exponential and Natural Logarithm Functions
    M06_GOLD7774_14_SE_C05.indd Page 254 09/11/16 7:31 PM localadmin /202/AW00221/9780134437774_GOLDSTEIN/GOLDSTEIN_CALCULUS_AND_ITS_APPLICATIONS_14E1 ... FOR REVIEW BY POTENTIAL ADOPTERS ONLY chapter 5SAMPLE Applications of the Exponential and Natural Logarithm Functions 5.1 Exponential Growth and Decay 5.4 Further Exponential Models 5.2 Compound Interest 5.3 Applications of the Natural Logarithm Function to Economics n Chapter 4, we introduced the exponential function y = ex and the natural logarithm Ifunction y = ln x, and we studied their most important properties. It is by no means clear that these functions have any substantial connection with the physical world. How- ever, as this chapter will demonstrate, the exponential and natural logarithm functions are involved in the study of many physical problems, often in a very curious and unex- pected way. 5.1 Exponential Growth and Decay Exponential Growth You walk into your kitchen one day and you notice that the overripe bananas that you left on the counter invited unwanted guests: fruit flies. To take advantage of this pesky situation, you decide to study the growth of the fruit flies colony. It didn’t take you too FOR REVIEW long to make your first observation: The colony is increasing at a rate that is propor- tional to its size. That is, the more fruit flies, the faster their number grows. “The derivative is a rate To help us model this population growth, we introduce some notation. Let P(t) of change.” See Sec. 1.7, denote the number of fruit flies in your kitchen, t days from the moment you first p.
    [Show full text]
  • Genius Manual I
    Genius Manual i Genius Manual Genius Manual ii Copyright © 1997-2016 Jiríˇ (George) Lebl Copyright © 2004 Kai Willadsen Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), Version 1.1 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. You can find a copy of the GFDL at this link or in the file COPYING-DOCS distributed with this manual. This manual is part of a collection of GNOME manuals distributed under the GFDL. If you want to distribute this manual separately from the collection, you can do so by adding a copy of the license to the manual, as described in section 6 of the license. Many of the names used by companies to distinguish their products and services are claimed as trademarks. Where those names appear in any GNOME documentation, and the members of the GNOME Documentation Project are made aware of those trademarks, then the names are in capital letters or initial capital letters. DOCUMENT AND MODIFIED VERSIONS OF THE DOCUMENT ARE PROVIDED UNDER THE TERMS OF THE GNU FREE DOCUMENTATION LICENSE WITH THE FURTHER UNDERSTANDING THAT: 1. DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED ON AN "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, WARRANTIES THAT THE DOCUMENT OR MODIFIED VERSION OF THE DOCUMENT IS FREE OF DEFECTS MERCHANTABLE, FIT FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR NON-INFRINGING. THE ENTIRE RISK AS TO THE QUALITY, ACCURACY, AND PERFORMANCE OF THE DOCUMENT OR MODIFIED VERSION OF THE DOCUMENT IS WITH YOU.
    [Show full text]
  • Tercentennial Anniversary of Bernoulli's Law of Large Numbers
    BULLETIN (New Series) OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 50, Number 3, July 2013, Pages 373–390 S 0273-0979(2013)01411-3 Article electronically published on March 28, 2013 TERCENTENNIAL ANNIVERSARY OF BERNOULLI’S LAW OF LARGE NUMBERS MANFRED DENKER 0 The importance and value of Jacob Bernoulli’s work was eloquently stated by Andre˘ı Andreyevich Markov during a speech presented to the Russian Academy of Science1 on December 1, 1913. Marking the bicentennial anniversary of the Law of Large Numbers, Markov’s words remain pertinent one hundred years later: In concluding this speech, I return to Jacob Bernoulli. His biogra- phers recall that, following the example of Archimedes he requested that on his tombstone the logarithmic spiral be inscribed with the epitaph Eadem mutata resurgo. This inscription refers, of course, to properties of the curve that he had found. But it also has a second meaning. It also expresses Bernoulli’s hope for resurrection and eternal life. We can say that this hope is being realized. More than two hundred years have passed since Bernoulli’s death but he lives and will live in his theorem. Indeed, the ideas contained in Bernoulli’s Ars Conjectandi have impacted many mathematicians since its posthumous publication in 1713. The twentieth century, in particular, has seen numerous advances in probability that can in some way be traced back to Bernoulli. It is impossible to survey the scope of Bernoulli’s influence in the last one hundred years, let alone the preceding two hundred. It is perhaps more instructive to highlight a few beautiful results and avenues of research that demonstrate the lasting effect of his work.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Euler's Work on Divergent Factorial Series and Their Associated
    Indian J. Pure Appl. Math., 41(1): 39-66, February 2010 °c Indian National Science Academy NOTES ON EULER’S WORK ON DIVERGENT FACTORIAL SERIES AND THEIR ASSOCIATED CONTINUED FRACTIONS Trond Digernes¤ and V. S. Varadarajan¤¤ ¤University of Trondheim, Trondheim, Norway e-mail: [email protected] ¤¤University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Factorial series which diverge everywhere were first considered by Euler from the point of view of summing divergent series. He discovered a way to sum such series and was led to certain integrals and continued fractions. His method of summation was essentialy what we call Borel summation now. In this paper, we discuss these aspects of Euler’s work from the modern perspective. Key words Divergent series, factorial series, continued fractions, hypergeometric continued fractions, Sturmian sequences. 1. Introductory Remarks Euler was the first mathematician to develop a systematic theory of divergent se- ries. In his great 1760 paper De seriebus divergentibus [1, 2] and in his letters to Bernoulli he championed the view, which was truly revolutionary for his epoch, that one should be able to assign a numerical value to any divergent series, thus allowing the possibility of working systematically with them (see [3]). He antic- ipated by over a century the methods of summation of divergent series which are known today as the summation methods of Cesaro, Holder,¨ Abel, Euler, Borel, and so on. Eventually his views would find their proper place in the modern theory of divergent series [4]. But from the beginning Euler realized that almost none of his methods could be applied to the series X1 1 ¡ 1!x + 2!x2 ¡ 3!x3 + ::: = (¡1)nn!xn (1) n=0 40 TROND DIGERNES AND V.
    [Show full text]
  • Calculus Terminology
    AP Calculus BC Calculus Terminology Absolute Convergence Asymptote Continued Sum Absolute Maximum Average Rate of Change Continuous Function Absolute Minimum Average Value of a Function Continuously Differentiable Function Absolutely Convergent Axis of Rotation Converge Acceleration Boundary Value Problem Converge Absolutely Alternating Series Bounded Function Converge Conditionally Alternating Series Remainder Bounded Sequence Convergence Tests Alternating Series Test Bounds of Integration Convergent Sequence Analytic Methods Calculus Convergent Series Annulus Cartesian Form Critical Number Antiderivative of a Function Cavalieri’s Principle Critical Point Approximation by Differentials Center of Mass Formula Critical Value Arc Length of a Curve Centroid Curly d Area below a Curve Chain Rule Curve Area between Curves Comparison Test Curve Sketching Area of an Ellipse Concave Cusp Area of a Parabolic Segment Concave Down Cylindrical Shell Method Area under a Curve Concave Up Decreasing Function Area Using Parametric Equations Conditional Convergence Definite Integral Area Using Polar Coordinates Constant Term Definite Integral Rules Degenerate Divergent Series Function Operations Del Operator e Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Deleted Neighborhood Ellipsoid GLB Derivative End Behavior Global Maximum Derivative of a Power Series Essential Discontinuity Global Minimum Derivative Rules Explicit Differentiation Golden Spiral Difference Quotient Explicit Function Graphic Methods Differentiable Exponential Decay Greatest Lower Bound Differential
    [Show full text]
  • Euler and His Work on Infinite Series
    BULLETIN (New Series) OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 44, Number 4, October 2007, Pages 515–539 S 0273-0979(07)01175-5 Article electronically published on June 26, 2007 EULER AND HIS WORK ON INFINITE SERIES V. S. VARADARAJAN For the 300th anniversary of Leonhard Euler’s birth Table of contents 1. Introduction 2. Zeta values 3. Divergent series 4. Summation formula 5. Concluding remarks 1. Introduction Leonhard Euler is one of the greatest and most astounding icons in the history of science. His work, dating back to the early eighteenth century, is still with us, very much alive and generating intense interest. Like Shakespeare and Mozart, he has remained fresh and captivating because of his personality as well as his ideas and achievements in mathematics. The reasons for this phenomenon lie in his universality, his uniqueness, and the immense output he left behind in papers, correspondence, diaries, and other memorabilia. Opera Omnia [E], his collected works and correspondence, is still in the process of completion, close to eighty volumes and 31,000+ pages and counting. A volume of brief summaries of his letters runs to several hundred pages. It is hard to comprehend the prodigious energy and creativity of this man who fueled such a monumental output. Even more remarkable, and in stark contrast to men like Newton and Gauss, is the sunny and equable temperament that informed all of his work, his correspondence, and his interactions with other people, both common and scientific. It was often said of him that he did mathematics as other people breathed, effortlessly and continuously.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bernoullis and the Harmonic Series
    The Bernoullis and The Harmonic Series By Candice Cprek, Jamie Unseld, and Stephanie Wendschlag An Exciting Time in Math l The late 1600s and early 1700s was an exciting time period for mathematics. l The subject flourished during this period. l Math challenges were held among philosophers. l The fundamentals of Calculus were created. l Several geniuses made their mark on mathematics. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646-1716) l Described as a universal l At age 15 he entered genius by mastering several the University of different areas of study. Leipzig, flying through l A child prodigy who studied under his father, a professor his studies at such a of moral philosophy. pace that he completed l Taught himself Latin and his doctoral dissertation Greek at a young age, while at Altdorf by 20. studying the array of books on his father’s shelves. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz l He then began work for the Elector of Mainz, a small state when Germany divided, where he handled legal maters. l In his spare time he designed a calculating machine that would multiply by repeated, rapid additions and divide by rapid subtractions. l 1672-sent form Germany to Paris as a high level diplomat. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz l At this time his math training was limited to classical training and he needed a crash course in the current trends and directions it was taking to again master another area. l When in Paris he met the Dutch scientist named Christiaan Huygens. Christiaan Huygens l He had done extensive work on mathematical curves such as the “cycloid”.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tricentenary History of the Law of Large Numbers
    Bernoulli 19(4), 2013, 1088–1121 DOI: 10.3150/12-BEJSP12 A Tricentenary history of the Law of Large Numbers EUGENE SENETA School of Mathematics and Statistics FO7, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] The Weak Law of Large Numbers is traced chronologically from its inception as Jacob Bernoulli’s Theorem in 1713, through De Moivre’s Theorem, to ultimate forms due to Uspensky and Khinchin in the 1930s, and beyond. Both aspects of Jacob Bernoulli’s Theorem: 1. As limit theorem (sample size n →∞), and: 2. Determining sufficiently large sample size for specified precision, for known and also unknown p (the inversion problem), are studied, in frequentist and Bayesian settings. The Bienaym´e–Chebyshev Inequality is shown to be a meeting point of the French and Russian directions in the history. Particular emphasis is given to less well-known aspects especially of the Russian direction, with the work of Chebyshev, Markov (the organizer of Bicentennial celebrations), and S.N. Bernstein as focal points. Keywords: Bienaym´e–Chebyshev Inequality; Jacob Bernoulli’s Theorem; J.V. Uspensky and S.N. Bernstein; Markov’s Theorem; P.A. Nekrasov and A.A. Markov; Stirling’s approximation 1. Introduction 1.1. Jacob Bernoulli’s Theorem Jacob Bernoulli’s Theorem was much more than the first instance of what came to be know in later times as the Weak Law of Large Numbers (WLLN). In modern notation Bernoulli showed that, for fixed p, any given small positive number ε, and any given large positive number c (for example c = 1000), n may be specified so that: arXiv:1309.6488v1 [math.ST] 25 Sep 2013 X 1 P p >ε < (1) n − c +1 for n n0(ε,c).
    [Show full text]