General Mission Analysis Tool (GMAT) User Guide

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

General Mission Analysis Tool (GMAT) User Guide General Mission Analysis Tool (GMAT) User Guide The GMAT Development Team 18 May 2012 General Mission Analysis Tool (GMAT): User Guide General Mission Analysis Tool (GMAT) Table of Contents Preface ............................................................................................................................ vi I. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction to GMAT ............................................................................................. 2 Licensing .......................................................................................................... 2 Platform Support .............................................................................................. 2 User Interfaces ................................................................................................. 3 Development Status .......................................................................................... 3 Contributors ..................................................................................................... 3 Getting Started ......................................................................................................... 4 Installation ....................................................................................................... 4 Starting and Quitting GMAT ............................................................................. 4 Running the GMAT Demos .............................................................................. 4 User Interfaces Overview .................................................................................. 5 Data and Configuration ................................................................................... 10 Other Resources ............................................................................................. 16 II. Creating Your First Mission ......................................................................................... 17 Simulating an Orbit ................................................................................................. 18 Objective and Overview .................................................................................. 18 Configure the Spacecraft .................................................................................. 18 Configure the Propagator ................................................................................. 20 Configure the Propagate Command .................................................................. 21 Run and Analyze the Results ............................................................................ 22 III. Common Tasks ......................................................................................................... 24 Configuring a Spacecraft .......................................................................................... 25 Setting the Initial Epoch .................................................................................. 25 Configuring the Orbit ...................................................................................... 25 Configuring Physical Properties ........................................................................ 26 Configuring the Attitude (Fixed) ....................................................................... 27 Configuring the Attitude (Spinner) .................................................................... 27 Propagating a Spacecraft .......................................................................................... 29 Configuring the Force Model ........................................................................... 29 Configuring the Force Model: Mars .................................................................. 29 Propagating for a Duration .............................................................................. 30 Propagating to an Orbit Condition ................................................................... 31 Reporting Data ....................................................................................................... 32 Reporting Data During a Propagation Span ....................................................... 32 Reporting Data at a Specific Mission Event ....................................................... 32 Creating a CCSDS Ephemeris File .................................................................... 33 Creating an SPK Ephemeris File ...................................................................... 33 Visualizing Data ...................................................................................................... 35 Manipulating the 3D Orbit View ...................................................................... 35 Configuring the Ground Track Plot .................................................................. 35 Creating a 2D Plot .......................................................................................... 35 IV. Tutorials ................................................................................................................... 37 Simple Orbit Transfer .............................................................................................. 38 Objective and Overview .................................................................................. 38 iii General Mission Analysis Tool (GMAT) Configure Maneuvers, Differential Corrector, and Graphics ................................. 38 Configure the Mission Sequence ....................................................................... 39 Run the Mission ............................................................................................. 46 V. Reference Guide ......................................................................................................... 48 I. Resources ............................................................................................................ 50 Array ............................................................................................................. 51 Barycenter ...................................................................................................... 52 CelestialBodies ................................................................................................ 53 CoordinateSystem ............................................................................................ 57 DifferentialCorrector ....................................................................................... 58 EphemerisFile ................................................................................................. 61 EphemerisPropagator ...................................................................................... 62 FiniteBurn ...................................................................................................... 63 Formation ...................................................................................................... 65 FuelTank ........................................................................................................ 66 GMATFunction .............................................................................................. 69 GroundStation ................................................................................................ 70 GroundTrackPlot ............................................................................................ 71 ImpulsiveBurn ................................................................................................ 74 LibrationPoint ................................................................................................. 76 MATLABFunction .......................................................................................... 78 OrbitView ...................................................................................................... 79 Propagator ...................................................................................................... 85 ReportFile ...................................................................................................... 92 SolarSystem .................................................................................................... 95 Spacecraft ....................................................................................................... 97 SQP ............................................................................................................. 106 String ........................................................................................................... 109 Thruster ....................................................................................................... 110 Variable ........................................................................................................ 115 VF13adOptimizer .......................................................................................... 116 XYPlot ......................................................................................................... 117 II. Commands ....................................................................................................... 119 Achieve ........................................................................................................ 120 BeginFiniteBurn ............................................................................................ 121 BeginMissionSequence ................................................................................... 122 CallGmatFunction
Recommended publications
  • A Software Package to Support Mission Analysis and Orbital Mechanics Calculations
    A Software Package to Support Mission Analysis and Orbital Mechanics Calculations Jorge Tiago Melo Barbosa da Silva e Vila Thesis to obtain the Master of Science Degree in Aerospace Engineering Supervisor: Prof. Paulo Jorge Soares Gil Examination Committee Chairperson: Prof. João Manuel Lage de Miranda Lemos Supervisor: Prof. Paulo Jorge Soares Gil Members of the Committee: Prof. Bertinho Manuel D'Andrade da Costa July of 2015 Dedicated to the loving memory of my grandfather Joaquim Barbosa, whom I shall always remember. Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisor Prof. Paulo Gil for the ideas, remarks, comments, and many engaging conversations which not only saw me through the learning process of this thesis, but also helped me personally. I want to thank Dr. Carlos del Burgo Díaz for the confidence shown in future applications of the software and the help provided with the star map alignment. I want to acknowledge Patrice-Emmanuel Schmitz, from the Open Source Observatory and Repository, for his legal opinions regarding the EUPL licensing. Furthermore, I want to thank Pavel Holoborodko for the excellent MPFR C++ interface class and the professionalism, sympathy, and cooperation displayed while resolving licensing issues. I would also like to thank my parents for the care and interest shown throughout the years in my education, and for the support given in pursuing the interests which led me here. Lastly, I want to express my deepest gratitude to Ana Morais for the love, patience, and continuous support during the development of this thesis. Without you none of this would have been possible.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 James Webb Space Telescope Initial Mid-Course Correction Monte Carlo Implementation Using Task Parallelism Jeremy Petersen
    James Webb Space Telescope Initial Mid-Course Correction Monte Carlo Implementation using Task Parallelism Jeremy Petersen(1), Jason Tichy(2), Geoffrey Wawrzyniak(3), and Karen Richon(4) (1,2,3)a.i. solutions, Inc., 10001 Derekwood Lane, Lanham, MD 20706, 301-306-1756, [email protected]. (4)Code 595.0, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 8800 Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt MD, 20771. 301-286-8845, [email protected]. The James Webb Space Telescope will be launched into a highly elliptical orbit that does not possess sufficient energy to achieve a proper Sun-Earth/Moon L2 libration point orbit. Three mid-course correction (MCC) maneuvers are planned to rectify the energy deficit: MCC-1a, MCC-1b, and MCC-2. To validate the propellant budget and trajectory design methods, a set of Monte Carlo analyses that incorporate MCC maneuver modeling and execution are employed. The first analysis focuses on the effects of launch vehicle injection errors on the magnitude of MCC-1a. The second on the spread of potential V based on the performance of the propulsion system as applied to all three MCC maneuvers. The final highlights the slight, but notable, contribution of the attitude thrusters during each MCC maneuver. Given the possible variations in these three scenarios, the trajectory design methods are determined to be robust to errors in the modeling of the flight system. Keywords: James Webb Space Telescope, Task Parallelism, Monte Carlo, Mid-Course Correction, Libration Point Orbit 1. Introduction The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) is the scientific successor of the Hubble Space Telescope and the Spitzer Space Telescope.
    [Show full text]
  • Aas 98-306 a Modernized Approach to Meet Diversified Earth Observing System (Eos) Am-1 Mission Requirements
    AAS 98-306 A MODERNIZED APPROACH TO MEET DIVERSIFIED EARTH OBSERVING SYSTEM (EOS) AM-1 MISSION REQUIREMENTS Lauri Kraft Newman NASA GSFC, Code 572 L Mark E. Hametz, Darrei J. Conway AI Solutions, Inc. From a flight dynamics perspective, the EOS AM-1 mission design and maneuver operations present a number of interesting challenges. The mission design itself is relatively complex for a low Earth mission, requiring a frozen, Sun-synchronous, polar orbit with a repeating ground track. Beyond the need to design an orbit that meets these requirements, the recent focus on low-cost, "lights out" operations has encouraged a shift to more automated ground support. Hight dynamics activities previously performed in special facilities created solely for that purpose and staffed by personnel with years of design experience are now being shifted to the mission operations centers (MOCs) staffed by flight operations team (FOT) operators. These operators' responsibilities include flight dynamics as a small subset of their work; therefore, FOT personnel often do not have the experience to make critical maneuver design decisions. Thus, streamlining the analysis and planning work required for such a complicated orbit design and preparing FOT personnel to take on the routine operation of such a spacecraft both necessitated increasing the automation level of the flight dynamics functionality. The FreeFlyer TM software developed by AI Solutions provides a means to achieve both of these goals. The graphic interface enables users to interactively perform analyses that previously required many parametric studies and much data reduction to achieve the same result. In addition, the fuzzy logic engine enables the simultaneous evaluation of multiple conflicting constraints, removing the analyst from the loop and allowing the FOT to perform more of the operations without much background in orbit design.
    [Show full text]
  • Basilisk: a Flexible, Scalable and Modular Astrodynamics Simulation Framework
    JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE INFORMATION SYSTEMS Vol. 17, No. 9, September 2020 Basilisk: A Flexible, Scalable and Modular Astrodynamics Simulation Framework Patrick W. Kenneally,∗ Scott Piggott,† and Hanspeter Schaub‡ University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0431 https://doi.org/10.2514/1.I010762 The Basilisk astrodynamics framework is a spacecraft simulation tool developed with an aim of strict modular separation and decoupling of modeling concerns in regard to coupled spacecraft dynamics, environment interactions, and flight software algorithms. Modules, tasks, and task groups are the three core components that enable Basilisk’s modular architecture. These core components are described and their functionality demonstrated. The Basilisk message-passing system is a critical communications layer that facilitates the routing of input and output data between modules. Furthermore, this paper outlines Basilisk’s data logging and Monte Carlo simulation functionality. The implementation of Basilisk’s Python wrapped C++/C technology stack is described. Finally, a sample spacecraft attitude control simulation demonstrates the modularity and flexibility of the framework. I. Introduction (DARTS)/Dshell [9] software to simulate complex spacecraft behav- PACECRAFT simulation software tools are an indispensable iors and control solution using closed software, and NASA 42 [10] to S part of modern spacecraft design processes. The continual simulate spacecraft with open software. increase in complexity of spacecraft mission and maneuver design, Each tool is developed with a specific subset of space asset dynamical and kinematic design verification, and postlaunch telem- simulation purposes in mind. For example, the OreKit, GMAT, and etry analysis all heavily rely on software simulation tools. These STK tools were initially developed with a focus on high-fidelity orbit simulation tools provide engineers with the ability to increase the dynamics, orbit estimation, orbit propagation, and trajectory design.
    [Show full text]
  • (Preprint) AAS 16-117 ORION EXPLORATION FLIGHT TEST 1
    (Preprint) AAS 16-117 ORION EXPLORATION FLIGHT TEST 1 (EFT-1) BEST ESTIMATED TRAJECTORY DEVELOPMENT Greg N. Holt,∗ and Aaron Browny The Orion Exploration Flight Test 1 (EFT-1) mission successfully flew on Dec 5, 2014 atop a Delta IV Heavy launch vehicle. The goal of Orions maiden flight was to stress the system by placing an uncrewed vehicle on a high-energy trajectory replicating conditions similar to those that would be experienced when returning from an asteroid or a lunar mission. The Orion navigation team combined all trajectory data from the mission into a Best Estimated Trajectory (BET) product. There were significant challenges in data reconstruction and many lessons were learned for future missions. The team used an estimation filter incorporating radar tracking, onboard sensors (Global Positioning System and Inertial Measurement Unit), and day-of-flight weather balloons to evaluate the true trajectory flown by Orion. Data was published for the entire Orion EFT-1 flight, plus objects jettisoned during entry such as the Forward Bay Cover. The BET customers include approx- imately 20 disciplines within Orion who will use the information for evaluating vehicle performance and influencing future design decisions. INTRODUCTION Following Orion’s successful maiden flight in December 2014, the Orion navigation team com- bined all trajectory data from the mission into a Best Estimated Trajectory (BET) product as seen in Figure1. This product is important for verifying the flight test objectives as well as validating pre- flight simulations and models. The data for the BET included radar tracking for ascent/entry/orbit, onboard sensors (Global Positioning System and Inertial Measurement Unit), and day-of-flight weather balloons.
    [Show full text]
  • Study, Modelling and Design of Intersatellite Links (Isl) in Millimeter-Wave Band
    GRADO EN INGENIER´IA DE TECNOLOG´IAS Y SERVICIOS DE TELECOMUNICACION´ TRABAJO FIN DE GRADO STUDY, MODELLING AND DESIGN OF INTERSATELLITE LINKS (ISL) IN MILLIMETER-WAVE BAND JOSE´ LUIS LASO FERNANDEZ´ JULIO 2020 TRABAJO DE FIN DE GRADO T´ıtulo: Estudio, modelado y dise~node enlaces intersatelitales (ISL) en bandas de milim´etricas T´ıtulo(ingl´es): Study, modelling and design of intersatellite links (ISL) in millimeter-wave band Autor: Jos´eLuis Laso Fern´andez Tutor: Ram´onMart´ınezRodr´ıguez-Osorio Departamento: Departamento de Se~nales,Sistemas y Radiocomunicaciones MIEMBROS DEL TRIBUNAL CALIFICADOR Presidente: |{ Vocal: |{ Secretario: |{ Suplente: |{ FECHA DE LECTURA: CALIFICACION:´ UNIVERSIDAD POLITECNICA´ DE MADRID ESCUELA TECNICA´ SUPERIOR DE INGENIEROS DE TELECOMUNICACION´ Departamento de Ingenier´ıade Sistemas Telem´aticos Grupo de Sistemas Inteligentes TRABAJO FIN DE GRADO STUDY, MODELLING AND DESIGN OF INTERSATELLITE LINKS (ISL) IN MILLIMETER-WAVE BAND Jos´eLuis Laso Fern´andez Julio 2020 Summary The purpose of this Final Project is to explore the wide range of possibilities millimeter waves (and beyond) have to offer in their application to intersatellite links (ISL). Massive LEO constellations, such as OneWeb or Starlink, can benefit from millimeter waves tech- nology, in terms of coverage, more robust global services or less need of ground stations. Therefore, multiple uses cases will be closely analysed and simulated in order to test it. The goals that have been set are, first of all, to properly dimension the ISL using the millimeter waves frequency range. It includes the Link Budget calculation, using Adaptive Coding and Modulation (ACM). There, we shall obtain useful link indicators such as CNR, bit rate or total losses.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Satellite Earth-To-Moon Direct Transfer Trajectories Using the CR3BP
    Scholars' Mine Masters Theses Student Theses and Dissertations Fall 2019 Small satellite earth-to-moon direct transfer trajectories using the CR3BP Garrett Levi McMillan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/masters_theses Part of the Aerospace Engineering Commons Department: Recommended Citation McMillan, Garrett Levi, "Small satellite earth-to-moon direct transfer trajectories using the CR3BP" (2019). Masters Theses. 7920. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/masters_theses/7920 This thesis is brought to you by Scholars' Mine, a service of the Missouri S&T Library and Learning Resources. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SMALL SATELLITE EARTH-TO-MOON DIRECT TRANSFER TRAJECTORIES USING THE CR3BP by GARRETT LEVI MCMILLAN A THESIS Presented to the Graduate Faculty of the MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE in AEROSPACE ENGINEERING 2019 Approved by: Dr. Henry Pernicka, Advisor Dr. David Riggins Dr. Serhat Hosder Copyright 2019 GARRETT LEVI MCMILLAN All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT The CubeSat/small satellite field is one of the fastest growing means of space exploration, with applications continuing to expand for component development, commu- nication, and scientific research. This thesis study focuses on establishing suitable small satellite Earth-to-Moon direct-transfer trajectories, providing a baseline understanding of their propulsive demands, determining currently available off-the-shelf propulsive technol- ogy capable of meeting these demands, as well as demonstrating the effectiveness of the Circular Restricted Three Body Problem (CR3BP) for preliminary mission design.
    [Show full text]
  • NNJ09HD46C Section J-10B155 - MCCS ATTACHMENT J-10
    NNJ09HD46C Section J-10b155 - MCCS ATTACHMENT J-10 Product Version Qty Vendor Under Maintenance/ Maintenance Vendor Maintenance Type (Manufacturer) Support? (Yes or No) Freeflyer Engineer Network License 6 a.i. solutions Yes a.i. solutions 24x7 subscription/support Freeflyer Mission Network License 48 a.i. solutions Yes a.i. solutions 24x7 subscription/support InstallShield 2010 Exp Win 10 Acresso Software No True Image ECHO Enterprise Server 1 Acronis Software No Komodo IDE 5 license 2 ActiveState No Komodo IDE Single License 2 ActiveState No ActiveXperts Network Monitor- 1 ActiveXperts SW Yes SHI 24x7 Actual Multiple Monitor Software 562 Actual Tools Yes SHI 24x7 subscription License GNAT Pro Ada native environment to 1 AdaCore Software Yes AdaCore Software 24x7 subscription/support develop Ada software (including Ada Acrobat Pro Windows 9 8 Adobe No Creative Suite Web Premium 5.5 15 Adobe No Dreamweaver CS5 11 1 Adobe No Flash Builder Premium for 4.5 1 Adobe No Mac/Windows FrameMaker 34 Adobe Yes SHI subscription FrameMaker 10 10 Adobe No Photoshop CS5 12 6 Adobe No pRTI 1516, 5 Fed 1 AEgis Technologies Yes AEgis Technologies 12x5 subscription/support XMLSpy Mission Kit 2013 R2 1 Altova Yes SHI 24x7 subscription/websupport XMLSpy Professional Ed. 2013 R2 1 Altova Yes SHI 24x7 subscription/websupport Amergent Software 1 Amergent Yes Amergent 24x7 subscription/support 4DX 13 Analytical Graphics Yes Analytical Graphics 24x7 Inc Inc subscription/websupport 4DX 2 Analytical Graphics Yes Analytical Graphics 24x7 Inc Inc subscription/websupport
    [Show full text]
  • Preparation of Papers for AIAA Technical Conferences
    Earth Observing System Covariance Realism Waqar H. Zaidi1 and Matthew D. Hejduk2 The purpose of covariance realism is to properly size a primary object’s covariance in order to add validity to the calculation of the probability of collision. The covariance realism technique in this paper consists of three parts: collection/calculation of definitive state estimates through orbit determination, calculation of covariance realism test statistics at each covariance propagation point, and proper assessment of those test statistics. An empirical cumulative distribution function (ECDF) Goodness-of-Fit (GOF) method is employed to determine if a covariance is properly sized by comparing the empirical distribution of Mahalanobis distance calculations to the hypothesized parent 3-DoF chi- squared distribution. To realistically size a covariance for collision probability calculations, this study uses a state noise compensation algorithm that adds process noise to the definitive epoch covariance to account for uncertainty in the force model. Process noise is added until the GOF tests pass a group significance level threshold. The results of this study indicate that when outliers attributed to persistently high or extreme levels of solar activity are removed, the aforementioned covariance realism compensation method produces a tuned covariance with up to 80 to 90% of the covariance propagation timespan passing (against a 60% minimum passing threshold) the GOF tests—a quite satisfactory and useful result. Nomenclature BC = Ballistic Coefficient CAM =
    [Show full text]
  • Control in an Information Rich World
    Control in an Information Rich World Report of the Panel on Future Directions in Control, Dynamics, and Systems DRAFT: v2.7, April 15, 2002 Abstract The field of control provides the principles and methods used to design physical and information systems that maintain desirable performance by sensing and automati- cally adapting to changes in the environment. Over the last forty years the field has seen huge advances, leveraging technology improvements in sensing and computa- tion with breakthroughs in the underlying principles and mathematics. Automatic control systems now play critical roles in many fields, including manufacturing, electronics, communications, transportation, computers and networks, and many military systems. As we begin the 21st Century, the opportunities for control principles and methods are exploding. Computation, communication and sensing are becoming increasingly cheap and ubiquitous, with more and more devices including embed- ded processors, sensors, and networking hardware. This will make possible the development of machines with a degree of intelligence and reactivity that will im- pact the life of everyone on the planet, both in terms of the products available and the very environment in which we live. New developments in this increasingly information rich world will require a significant expansion of the basic tool sets of control. The complexity of the con- trol ideas involved in the operation of the Internet, semi-autonomous systems, and enterprise-wide supply chain management, for example, are on the boundary of what can be done with available methods. Future applications in aerospace and transportation, information and networks, robotics and intelligent machines, biol- ogy and medicine, and materials and processing will create systems that are well beyond our current levels of complexity, and new research is required to enable such applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of the Interlink Between Small Satellites in a Constellation
    Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya ESEIAAT BACHELOR’S DEGREE THESIS IN AEROSPACE VEHICLES ENGINEERING Study of the interlink between small satellites in a constellation REPORT Author: David Puig Puig Director: Miquel Sureda Anfrès Co-director: Jorge Mata Díaz 10th May 2019 “Remember to look up at the stars and not down at your feet. Try to make sense of what you see and wonder about what makes the universe exist. Be curious. And however difficult life may seem, there is always something you can do and succeed at. It matters that you don’t just give up.” — STEPHEN HAWKING Acknowledgements I would like to express my very great appreciation to Miquel Sureda who, as a director, super- vised my project in a fantastic way. Not only for the valuable advice and guideline but also for the encouragement and patience. My special thanks are extended to Jorge Mata. As a co- director he contributed in the guidance of this study. I also wish to acknowledge the help provided by a previous ESEIAAT student for the “Study of the ground - to - Very Low Earth Orbit (VLEO) satellite communication link”, developed by Cànida Muñoz. I am particularly grateful for the assistance given by the online community. Without them this project would have been impossible. Not only for people who provides solutions but also for those who raise the questions. Finally, I would like to express my infinite gratitude to my family and friends who, for some reason, always had a great confidence in me. i Contents Acknowledgements i List of Figures v List of Tables vii List of Abbreviations viii List of Symbols ix 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Aim ..............................................1 1.2 Scope .
    [Show full text]
  • Design Study for a Formation-Flying Nanosatellite Cluster
    2005:147 CIV EXAMENSARBETE Design Study for a Formation-Flying Nanosatellite Cluster SARA GIDLUND MASTER OF SCIENCE PROGRAMME in Space Engineering Luleå University of Technology Department of Space Science, Kiruna 2005:147 CIV • ISSN: 1402 - 1617 • ISRN: LTU - EX - - 05/147 - - SE Design Study for a Formation- Flying Nanosatellite Cluster. Centre for Large Space Structures and Systems Inc. (CLS3) 1425 Blvd. René Lévesque W-700 Montreal, Québec H3G 1T7 Canada Abstract Nanosatellites flying in formation vastly increase the capability of small satellite missions. The approach is within reach of technology, but there are severe challenges for the subsystems. The most demanding task is to implement effective control of the satellites. There are many options for solving the high and the low level control. The propulsion system and the communication system are the subsystems that will determine the constraints on the formation that may be used, and the duration of the mission. The mission of the cluster that the Centre for Large Space Structures and Systems Inc (CLS3) intends to launch will make use of existing technologies for nanosatellites and merge them with an in-house Guidance Navigation and Control system. The project will be developed as a collaboration between companies and organizations, in North America and Europe. The objective of the initial study was to summarize the state-of-the-art for the subsystems, and to stimulate discussions with potential partners. Negotiations with launch companies were also initiated. The satellites will fly in a circular or projected circular formation. In order to calculate the orbits of the satellites, it is of great importance to understand the Hill’s equations.
    [Show full text]