Ceres Et Proserpina Which Is the Longest Word in the Dictionary? Smiles

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ceres Et Proserpina Which Is the Longest Word in the Dictionary? Smiles Nomen: Dies: Manus: Teacher: Ceres et Proserpina Which is the longest word in the dictionary? Smiles. Because there is a mile between each s! A number of words have been removed from the text and placed in a word bank. Use the words from the word bank to fill in the blanks in the text. Write the words in the blanks provided. Ceres, the [1]___________ of grain, and her [2]____________ Proserpina [3]__________ in Sicily. Once Proserpina and other [4]__________ were in the [5]__________. They [6]__________ a [7]______________ place and picked [8]___________ flowers. The [9]___________ was [10]____________; the [11]_____________ of the girls was great. Pluto, [12]__________ of those below, [13]__________ Proserpina and [14]__________ her. He [15]__________ on his horses and [16]______________ the place [17]__________ the girls were. The girls [18]__________. Proserpina [19]____________ to [20]__________, but Pluto was [21]__________ and [22]__________ her, [23]__________ her in the [24]__________, [25]__________ her to the underworld. Ceres [26]__________ out of the [27]__________ at night. She [28]___________ her daughter, but Proserpina did not [29]__________. Great was the [30]__________ of the [31]___________. Ceres [32]______________ many [33]__________, to the [34]__________ of the earth. She did not find [35]__________. [36]___________ Ceres did not [37]__________ Proserpina, she did not [38]__________ in the [39]__________. There [40]__________ no flowers, there was no [41]__________ in the fields. The people lived a [42]__________ life and blamed the [43]___________ because the [44]__________ of [45]__________ was great. Many [46]___________ said: "What [47]__________ we [48]__________? We [49]__________ in the fields but [50]__________ do not have [51]__________. We are not [52]__________. The [53]__________ are not [54]__________; they do not do their [55]__________." Jupiter, who [56]__________ gods and [57]__________, saw the [58]______________ of the people Schoolhouse Technologies Vocabulary Worksheet Factory - 2 - and [59]_____________ to the goddess of the fields: "Proserpina is [60]__________ but Pluto [61]__________ her. I will [62]__________ Mercury the [63]_____________ to the underworld. Mercury will [64]__________ your daughter to you. But Proserpina will not [65]__________ remain on the [66]__________. So it will be [67]____________: she will spend part of the [68]__________ on the earth, part [69]__________ the earth." [70]__________ Jupiter brought about [71]___________. Ceres [72]____________ her daughter. Proserpina [73]__________ part of the year on the earth, part under the earth. Whenever she is [74]__________ on the earth, we [75]__________ many flowers and a great [76]_____________ of grain, [77]___________ Ceres is [78]____________ in the fields and great is the [79]_____________ of the goddess. But whenever Proserpina [80]___________ to the underworld, Ceres is [81]__________, and there are not [82]___________ flowers. ABUNDANCE FIELDS INJUSTICES SO ALWAYS FIELDS JUST SPENT ANNOUNCED FIND LEAD STRONG APPROACHED FLED LED STRONG APPROACHED FLEE LEISURE SUITABLE AWAITED FOOD LIVED UNDER BECAUSE FOUND LOVED URGED BECAUSE FREE MEN VARIOUS CAME GIRLS MESSENGER VARIOUS COME GOD PEACE WAGON CONVENIENT GODDESS PLACED WE DAUGHTER GODDESS PLACES WELL DEPARTS GODDESS PLEASING WERE DO GODS PRICE WHERE DUTY GRAIN RECEIVED WILL EAGERNESS GRAIN RULES WORK EAGERNESS GRATEFUL SAD WORK EARTH HARD SAW WORRY ENDS HARMONY SEE YEAR FARMERS HAS SEIZED FIELDS HASTENED SEND Schoolhouse Technologies Vocabulary Worksheet Factory.
Recommended publications
  • Graham Jones
    Ni{ i Vizantija XIV 629 Graham Jones SEEDS OF SANCTITY: CONSTANTINE’S CITY AND CIVIC HONOURING OF HIS MOTHER HELENA Of cities and citizens in the Byzantine world, Constantinople and its people stand preeminent. A recent remark that the latter ‘strove in everything to be worthy of the Mother of God, to Whom the city was dedicated by St Constantine the Great in 330’ follows a deeply embedded pious narrative in which state and church intertwine in the city’s foundation as well as its subse- quent fortunes. Sadly, it perpetuates a flawed reading of the emperor’s place in the political and religious landscape. For a more nuanced and considered view we have only to turn to Vasiliki Limberis’ masterly account of politico-religious civic transformation from the reign of Constantine to that of Justinian. In the concluding passage of Divine Heiress: The Virgin Mary and the Creation of Christianity, Limberis reaffirms that ‘Constantinople had no strong sectarian Christian tradition. Christianity was new to the city, and it was introduced at the behest of the emperor.’ Not only did the civic ceremonies of the imperial cult remain ‘an integral part of life in the city, breaking up the monotony of everyday existence’. Hecate, Athena, Demeter and Persephone, and Isis had also enjoyed strong presences in the city, some of their duties and functions merging into those of two protector deities, Tyche Constantinopolis, tutelary guardian of the city and its fortune, and Rhea, Mother of the Gods. These two continued to be ‘deeply ingrained in the religious cultural fabric of Byzantium..
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Roman Events
    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Death in Ancient Rome
    Reading Death in Ancient Rome Reading Death in Ancient Rome Mario Erasmo The Ohio State University Press • Columbus Copyright © 2008 by The Ohio State University. All rights reserved. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Erasmo, Mario. Reading death in ancient Rome / Mario Erasmo. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-8142-1092-5 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-8142-1092-9 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Death in literature. 2. Funeral rites and ceremonies—Rome. 3. Mourning cus- toms—Rome. 4. Latin literature—History and criticism. I. Title. PA6029.D43E73 2008 870.9'3548—dc22 2008002873 This book is available in the following editions: Cloth (ISBN 978-0-8142-1092-5) CD-ROM (978-0-8142-9172-6) Cover design by DesignSmith Type set in Adobe Garamond Pro by Juliet Williams Printed by Thomson-Shore, Inc. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials. ANSI 39.48-1992. 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Contents List of Figures vii Preface and Acknowledgments ix INTRODUCTION Reading Death CHAPTER 1 Playing Dead CHAPTER 2 Staging Death CHAPTER 3 Disposing the Dead 5 CHAPTER 4 Disposing the Dead? CHAPTER 5 Animating the Dead 5 CONCLUSION 205 Notes 29 Works Cited 24 Index 25 List of Figures 1. Funerary altar of Cornelia Glyce. Vatican Museums. Rome. 2. Sarcophagus of Scipio Barbatus. Vatican Museums. Rome. 7 3. Sarcophagus of Scipio Barbatus (background). Vatican Museums. Rome. 68 4. Epitaph of Rufus.
    [Show full text]
  • 3274 Myths and Legends of Ancient Rome
    MYTHS AND LEGENDS OF ANCIENT ROME CFE 3274V OPEN CAPTIONED UNITED LEARNING INC. 1996 Grade Levels: 6-10 20 minutes 1 Instructional Graphic Enclosed DESCRIPTION Explores the legend of Romulus and Remus, twin boys who founded Rome on seven hills. Briefly relates how Perseus, son of Jupiter, used his shield as a mirror to safely slay Medusa, a monster who turned anyone who looked on her to stone. Recounts the story of Psyche and Cupid, a story of broken promises and forgiveness. Each legend ends with discussion questions. Animated. INSTRUCTIONAL GOALS · To depict three Roman myths. · To enhance a unit on Roman mythology. · To show how the Romans explained natural phenomena and human behavior. · To show that human nature remains the same throughout the ages. BEFORE SHOWING 1. Read the CAPTION SCRIPT to determine unfamiliar vocabulary and language concepts. 2. Discuss the concept of myths: a. As a way of explaining and rationalizing natural phenomena. b. As stories of the heroic deeds and adventures of mortals with semidivine parentage. c. As stories of a large family of quarrelsome gods and goddesses. 3. Explain that the video shows three different Roman myths. a. Using a time line, explain that Roman mythology appeared after Greek mythology. b. Display a list of gods and goddesses and their Roman and Greek names. c. Explain there are many variations of the same myths. 4. Display a family tree of the Roman gods and goddesses. 1 a. Include pictures of monsters such as Medusa and Cerberus. b. Refer to the tree as characters appear in the video.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roman Gods Edited
    The Roman gods Romans believed in many deities. These gods were modelled closely after the Greek gods, though they had Latin names and slightly different personalities and attributes. The word used to refer to an entire group of gods is pantheon and comes from a Greek word meaning “all the gods.” The Roman pantheon consisted of about 20 major gods and hundreds of minor deities. Some of these major gods include the king of the gods, Jupiter, who was also the god of the sky. His wife, Juno, was queen of the gods and goddess of marriage. Neptune was the god of the oceans and Pluto the god of the underworld. Mercury was the god of messengers and travellers and messenger to the gods. Ceres was the goddess of agriculture, grain and fertility. Minerva was the goddess of wisdom and is often shown with an owl. Apollo and Diana were twin brother and sister. Apollo was the god of medicine, plague, poetry and music. Diana was the goddess of hunters and the moon. Mars, the god of war, was the lover of Venus, the goddess of love. Vulcan was the smith god, who also had power over volcanoes. Roma was the embodiment of the city of Rome and Victoria was the goddess of victory. There were a few groups of gods, usually in threes, or triads, that the Romans felt were the most important and who had grand temples built in their honour. The oldest triad, the Capitoline, was originally composed of Jupiter, Mars and Quirinus, an ancient god who came to embody the deified Romulus—the mythic founder of Rome.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction. Dionysus in Rome: Accommodation and Resistance
    Fiachra Mac Góráin Introduction. Dionysus in Rome: accommodation and resistance Abstract: This introductory chapter provides a wide-angle history of the presence of Dionysus/Bacchus/Liber on Italian soil from the archaic to the early Christian periods, covering archaeological and literary sources. In parallel, it surveys the main scholarly trends on the Italian versions of Dionysus, and emplots the con- tributions to this volume in a history of scholarship. The main focus of the chap- ter, which is programmatic for the volume, is the interface of Greek and Roman cultures, and whether it is possible to identify and define (an) Italian version(s) of Dionysus. It posits two aspects to the Romans’ reception of Bacchus, which may be termed ‘accommodation’ and ‘resistance’. The interplay between these two levels of response will inform an analytic narrative that assesses the relation- ship between the Greek Dionysus and the Roman Liber, embracing interpretatio and religious polymorphism, and addressing some of the most important Diony- sian manifestations in Roman culture: the founding of the temple of Ceres, Liber and Libera; the Bacchanalia; the Liberalia; Roman leaders’ uses of Dionysus; the poets’ references to Bacchus; and a brief glance at the Bacchic-Christian inter- face. As ‘our oldest living symbol’,1 Dionysus/Bacchus has evolved over many different forms. Until relatively recently, scholars believed that he was an import from the East, and a late addition to the Greek pantheon. Rohde, Nilsson, Wilamowitz and Otto all subscribed to different versions of the Nietzschean myth that an ecstatic Dionysus cult was assimilated from Thrace and tamed by the influence of Apollo.2 This view was based on the god’s slight role in the Homeric poems, coupled with For discussion of Dionysus in Rome and bibliographical advice, I wish to thank Clifford Ando, Andreas Bendlin, Tom Carpenter, Michael Crawford, Elena Giusti, Dan Hogg, Duncan MacRae, John North, Donncha O’Rourke, Richard Seaford, and Peter Wiseman.
    [Show full text]
  • Clodia, Fulvia, Livia, Messalina: What Can We Really Learn About the Elite Women of Rome?
    Clodia, Fulvia, Livia, Messalina: what can we really learn about the elite women of Rome? ‘A dissertation submitted to the University of Wales Trinity Saint David in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts’ 29001652 Jacqueline Margaret Meredith 2014 Master’s Degrees by Examination and Dissertation Declaration Form. 1. This work has not previously been accepted in substance for any degree and is not being concurrently submitted in candidature for any degree. Name: J M Meredith Date: 21 March 2014 2. This dissertation is being submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. Name: J M Meredith Date: 21 March 2014 3. This dissertation is the result of my own independent work/investigation, except where otherwise stated. Other sources are acknowledged by footnotes giving explicit references. A bibliography is appended. Name: J M Meredith Date: 21 March 2014 4. I hereby give consent for my dissertation, if accepted, to be available for photocopying, inter-library loan, and for deposit in the University’s digital repository. Name: J M Meredith Date: 21 March 2014 Supervisor’s Declaration. I am satisfied that this work is the result of the student’s own efforts. Name: …………………………………………………………………………... Date: ……………………………………………………………………………... Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................... 5 Introduction and literature review ........................................................... 6 Women in the Late Republic .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 'Political' Tibullus: Ceres and Grain in Elegies Books 1 and 2
    New England Classical Journal Volume 48 Issue 1 Pages 20-35 5-14-2021 Towards a ‘Political’ Tibullus: Ceres and Grain in Elegies Books 1 and 2 Victoria Jansson The Graduate Center, City University of New York, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://crossworks.holycross.edu/necj Part of the Classics Commons Recommended Citation Jansson, Victoria (2021) "Towards a ‘Political’ Tibullus: Ceres and Grain in Elegies Books 1 and 2," New England Classical Journal: Vol. 48 : Iss. 1 , 20-35. https://doi.org/10.52284/NECJ/48.1/article/jansson This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CrossWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in New England Classical Journal by an authorized editor of CrossWorks. Towards a ‘Political’ Tibullus: Ceres and Grain in Elegies Books 1 and 2 VICTORIA JANSSON Abstract: This article argues that unfulfilled prayers to Ceres in Tibullus’ elegies are symptomatic of Rome’s grain crises at the end of the Republic and beginning of Empire. My approach includes philological, socioeconomic, and psychoanalytic analysis of the elegies, in which the poet examines the shifting definition of a ‘Roman’ in his day. I seek to demonstrate the ways in which the poet grapples with the political and economic forces at work during the most turbulent period of Roman history: a time when income inequality was roughly equivalent to that of the U.S. and E.U. today.1 Keywords: Tibullus, elegy, literary theory, grain, Ceres, Lacan. I argue that the elegies of Tibullus constitute a bold poetic program in which the author explores widespread social change.
    [Show full text]
  • ROMULUS and REMUS; Althougk We Will Not Spare Exertion OR, to Win Your Praise To-Dav- the BUILDING of ROME
    ^oMS^ Disce quaisi semper victurus; vive quasi eras moritnms. VOL. XVI. NOTRE DAME, INDIANA, MARCH 3, 1883. 25- Then listen to the kindly version, Portray it feebly as we may; ROMULUS AND REMUS; AlthougK we will not spare exertion OR, To win your praise to-daV- THE BUILDING OF ROME. ACT FIRST. ScEXE FIRST. An Historical Tragedy; in Five Acts. A Forest in the Alban Territor)'. FliAll.. (ASIDE)—1 am astonished,' he's a genias! (Atom).) I say, sir. {^JBnter INSIDIUS, URSINUS, SMILAX and PRO­ DB. O'TOOLE.—1 differ with you there, sir. MISCUUS, hearing a sheefJ) FliAll..—I say that any man who vrould put such a book as Rdmalns'aDd Remus into a child's hand would put the^the heathen conchology ! INSIDIUS.—Here, boys, here! This is just ^he DB. O'TOOLE.—SO I would, sir. spot. HeVe we can kill, cook, and feast upon our —THE IBISR TUTOB. p^^y- • - . , •.,.. DRAMATIS PERSONS. URSINUS.—^What think ye? Is there ho' danger from Amulius' men? AM'ULIUS, King de facto of Alba Loriga. NuMiTOR,* His Brother: King de jure. SMILAX.—They never come this way. These; are Numitor's woods. , . •o c,»r-c. I Twin Brothers' Grandsons to"Nuniitor. K-EMl/S ) ... ' INSIDIUS.—They are Numitbr's as much! as"; any FAUSTULUS, Their Foster-father. other property that he calls his own; which is' n6 PLISTINUS', Brother to Faustulus. more than Amulius forbears to ro|b hiin of. DuBius, A Friend of Numitor's. VACILLUS, A Courtier. PROMISCUUS.—There! I ani rid of this burden INSIDIUS ' ^ at last, {^laying' doivn the sheep') It is a well- URSINUS I Herdsmen, Servants earned meal, after all; if we are only allowed to SMILAX r of Numitor.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Greek and Roman Stylistic Elements in the Portraiture of Livia Drusilla
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Supervised Undergraduate Student Research Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects and Creative Work 5-2015 A Study of Greek and Roman Stylistic Elements in the Portraiture of Livia Drusilla Chloe Elizabeth Lovelace [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj Part of the Classical Archaeology and Art History Commons Recommended Citation Lovelace, Chloe Elizabeth, "A Study of Greek and Roman Stylistic Elements in the Portraiture of Livia Drusilla" (2015). Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/1857 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Supervised Undergraduate Student Research and Creative Work at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Study of Greek and Roman Stylistic Elements in the Portraiture of Livia Drusilla Honors Thesis Project Chloe Lovelace Faculty Advisor: Dr. Stephen Collins-Elliott Department of Classics 1 Introduction For the past three-hundred years or so, the study of Roman art has been seen through the lens of the 18 th century German elite; their writings have been translated, analyzed, debunked, praised, but we cannot remove ourselves from their original work, or their original prejudices. Though revolutionary, establishing the nascence of art history itself, they limited Roman art to a category of imitation, rather than viewing it as art on its own. Rome is punished eternally for the arbitration of time—its place later in history has given it a reputation as a state of cultural appropriation.
    [Show full text]
  • 75 AD ROMULUS Legendary, 8Th Century B.C. Plutarch Translated by John Dryden
    75 AD ROMULUS Legendary, 8th Century B.C. Plutarch translated by John Dryden Plutarch (46-120) - Greek biographer, historian, and philosopher, sometimes known as the encyclopaedist of antiquity. He is most renowned for his series of character studies, arranged mostly in pairs, known as “Plutarch’s Lives of the Noble Grecians and Romans” or “Parallel Lives.” Romulus (75 AD) - A study of the life of Romulus, the founder of Rome. ROMULUS From whom, and for what reason, the city of Rome, a name so great in glory, and famous in the mouths of all men, was so first called, authors do not agree. Some are of opinion that the Pelasgians, wandering over the greater part of the habitable world, and subduing numerous nations, fixed themselves here, and, from their own great strength in war, called the city Rome. Others, that at the taking of Troy, some few that escaped and met with shipping, put to sea, and driven by winds, were carried upon the coasts of Tuscany, and came to anchor off the mouth of the river Tiber, where their women, out of heart and weary with the sea, on its being proposed by one of the highest birth and best understanding amongst them, whose name was Roma, burnt the ships. With which act the men at first were angry, but afterwards, of necessity, seating themselves near Palatium, where things in a short while succeeded far better than they could hope, in that they found the country very good, and the people courteous, they not only did the lady Roma other honours, but added also this, of calling after her name the city which she had been the occasion of their founding.
    [Show full text]
  • Fear, Anger, and Hatred in Livy's Account of the Struggle of the Orders DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the R
    Fear, Anger, and Hatred in Livy’s Account of the Struggle of the Orders DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Henry S. Blume Graduate Program in Greek and Latin The Ohio State University 2017 Dissertation Committee: William Batstone, Advisor Dana Munteanu Nathan S. Rosenstein Copyrighted by Henry Storm Blume 2017 ABSTRACT This dissertation explores the way in which emotions affect the course of Roman politics in the first six books of Livy’s account of the history of Rome. The expulsion of Tarquinius Superbus, the last king of Rome, and the transition to the Republic fundamentally transformed the relationship between the two orders of Rome, the patricians and the plebeians. For the first time, the two orders existed without a ruler and mediator; in other words, the shape of the Republic compelled two different societal classes, whose interests often did not align, to work together for the common safety and prosperity of the city and its citizens. In the years that followed the death of Tarquinius Superbus, the two orders engaged in a struggle over libertas, “freedom,” and dignitas, “prestige,” with the plebeians striving to gain a greater amount of freedom and the patricians endeavoring to preserve their privlige. Historiographical analyses of the books of Livy that cover the so-called Struggle of the Orders (494 B.C. to 367 B.C.) primarily focus on exemplarity, the character of particular individuals, or abstract concepts such as libertas, dignitas, virtus, etc. These forms of analysis are all valid, and, indeed, find support in Livy’s own directives for reading his history.
    [Show full text]