<<

BY THE NUMBERS 2020 Table of Contents

■ Chapter 1 Undergraduate Studies | 5

■ Chapter 2 Graduate Studies | 19

■ Chapter 3 Community | 31

■ Chapter 4 Research | 53

■ Chapter 5 Awards & Rankings | 79

■ Chapter 6 Advancement & Communications | 99

■ Chapter 7 Financial & Physical Resources | 109

■ Chapter 8 Data Sources | 115

We wish to acknowledge this land on which the University of operates. For thousands of years it has been the traditional land of the Huron-Wendat, the Seneca, and most recently, the Mississaugas of the Credit River. Today, this meeting place is still the home to many Indigenous people from across Turtle Island and we are grateful to have the opportunity to work on this land. FACULTY AT A GLANCE

Read U of T Engineering’s Impact Report 2020 at uofteng.ca/ annualreport

Researchers from the lab of Professor Warren Chan (BME) pose in the lobby of the Terrence Donnelly Centre for Cellular & Biomolecular Research. The team is working on a new approach to rapid, point-of-care testing for COVID-19, just one example of the many ways U of T Engineering researchers have leveraged their expertise in the fight against the . PHOTO: ALEXANDROS SKLAVOUNOS Comparison of U of T Engineering with and , 2018–2019

U of T U of T U of T % of % of Engineering Ontario Ontario Canada Canada

Undergraduate

Enrolment (FTE) 5,273 36,732 14.4% 88,278 6.0%

% Women 34.4% 23.8% 21.9%

Degrees Awarded 1,057 7,648 13.8% 16,725 6.3%

% Women 27.5% 20.6% 21.0%

Master's (MEng, MASc and MHSc)

Enrolment (FTE) 1,296 7,624 17.0% 17,450 7.4%

Degrees Awarded 751 3,796 19.8% 7,768 9.7%

% Women 27.2% 24.6% 25.2%

Doctoral (PhD)

Enrolment (FTE) 849 3,676 23.1% 9,653 8.8%

Degrees Awarded 143 583 24.5% 1,576 9.1%

% Women 33.6% 25.0% 24.9%

Faculty

Tenured and Tenure-Stream 237 1,635 14.5% 3,798 6.2%

% Women 20.3% 17.7% 15.9%

Major Awards

Major Awards Received 10 29 34.5% 61 16.4%

Research Funding

NSERC Funding for Engineering $35.4M $156.6M 22.6% $378.8M 9.4%

Footnote: Enrolment and degrees awarded are based on the 2018 calendar year. Faculty data is current as of November 2018. NSERC research funding is based on the 2018–2019 grant year (April-March). Major award counts are based on the 2019 calendar year.

Comparison of U of T Engineering with Ontario and Canada, 2018–2019

Note: Enrolment and degrees awarded are based on the 2018 calendar year. Faculty data is as of November 2018 and include tenured and tenure-stream faculty only. NSERC research funding is based on the 2018–2019 grant year (April-March). Major award counts are based on the 2019 calendarChapter: year. Introduction Excel Filename: 0.1 - Compare UofT w Ont+Cdn (EngCan) - 2018 (AR20 0.1) - v1.xlsx Sheet: 0.1 (AR'20) Date: June 17, 2020 2 IntroductionPrepared by: Geoff Wichert Comparison of U of T Engineering with St. George Campus and , 2019–2020

U of T St. George Engineering University Engineering Engineering Campus % of Campus of Toronto % of U of T

Student Enrolment

Undergraduate 5,280 38,526 13.7% 67,252 7.9%

Professional Master's (MEng and MHSc) 991 9,159 10.8% 9,845 10.1%

Research Master's (MASc) 635 2,982 21.3% 3,111 20.4%

Doctoral (PhD) 1,010 6,560 15.4% 6,966 14.5%

All Students 7,916 57,227 13.8% 87,174 9.1%

Degrees Awarded

Undergraduate 1,080 8,323 13.0% 13,291 8.1%

Professional Master's (MEng and MHSc) 497 4,326 11.5% 4,724 10.5%

Research Master's (MASc) 295 1,453 20.3% 1,522 19.4%

Doctoral (PhD) 133 810 16.4% 845 15.7%

Total Degrees 2,005 14,912 13.4% 20,382 9.8%

Faculty and Staff

Professoriate 266 3,163 8.4%

Administrative and Technical Staff 361 7,563 4.8%

Research Funding

Sponsored Research Funding $100.4M $502.9M 20.0%

Industry Research Funding $16.4M $29.1M 56.4%

Space

Space (NASMs) 70,638 640,881 11.0% 852,933 8.3%

Revenue

University-wide Costs $75.8M $605.6M 12.5%

Total Operating Revenue $215.9M $2,336.4M 9.2%

Comparison of U of T Engineering with St. George Campus and University of Toronto, 2019–2020

Chapter: 0 - Introduction Excel Filename: 0.2 - Compare APSC w StG + UofT - Summary - 19-20 (AR20 0.2) - v1fc.xlsx Sheet: 0.2 (AR20) Date: June 25, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert Introduction 3 Faculty Leadership, 2019–2020

Dean Chair, Department of Materials Christopher Yip & Engineering Glenn Hibbard Vice-Dean, Graduate Studies Julie Audet Chair, Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering Vice-Dean, Undergraduate Markus Bussmann Thomas Coyle Director, Institute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Vice-Dean, Research & Practice Ramin Farnood Greg Evans

Associate Dean, Cross-Disciplinary Programs Assistant Dean and Director of Diversity, Bryan Karney Inclusion & Professionalism Marisa Sterling Vice-Dean, First Year Micah Stickel Chief Administrative Officer Lisa Camilleri Director, University of Toronto Institute for Aerospace Studies Chief Financial Officer Christopher Damaren Brian Coates

Director, Institute of Biomedical Engineering Director, Facilities & Infrastructure Planning Warren Chan Tom Saint-Ivany

Chair, Department of Chemical Engineering Director, Office of the Dean & Applied Chemistry Cathy Grilo Grant Allen Executive Director, Communications Chair, Department of Civil & Mineral Engineering Marit Mitchell Brent Sleep Executive Director, Advancement Chair, The Edward S. Rogers Sr. Department Georgette Zinaty (to January 30, 2020) of Electrical & Computer Engineering Mark Rittinger (as of May 4, 2020) Deepa Kundur Faculty Registrar Chair, Division of Engineering Science MacMillan Will Cluett (interim)

4 Introduction Professor Jennifer Farmer CHAPTER 1 (ChemE) instructs a class of third-year chemical engineering undergraduates in the Technology Enhanced Active Learning UNDERGRADUATE rooms within the Myhal Centre for Engineering Innovation & Entrepreneurship. PHOTO: DARIA PEREVEZENTSEV STUDIES

FACTS & FIGURES 73.5% 94.0% 16.7 Proportion of eligible Proportion of undergraduate Average student-to-faculty students who chose to students who move on to ratio across all departments 47.7% complete 12- to 16-month second year within two years and divisions, with some work terms through the of starting their programs. ranging as low as 10.0. Proportion of students PEY Co-op Program in graduating with Honours or 2019–2020. High Honours standing. Figure 1.1a Applications, Offers, Registrations, Selectivity and Yield of First-Year Undergraduates, 2010 to 2019

14,000

12,000

10,000

8,000

6,000

4,000

2,000

0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Applications 7,446 7,881 8,745 9,326 10,095 10,989 11,418 12,298 13,272 12,263 Offers 3,329 3,347 3,149 3,309 3,042 3,203 3,126 2,983 3,380 3,937 Registrations 1,188 1,203 1,180 1,265 1,106 1,192 1,205 1,005 1,062 1,202 Selectivity 0.45 0.42 0.36 0.35 0.30 0.29 0.27 0.24 0.25 0.32 Yield 0.36 0.36 0.37 0.38 0.36 0.37 0.39 0.34 0.31 0.31

Figure 1.1a Applications, Offers, Registrations, Selectivity and Yield of First-Year Undergraduates, 2010 to 2019

Chapter: Ch.1 - Undergraduate Excel Filename: 1.1a-c - UG - Yield+Selectivity - 10-19 (AR20 1.1) - v1fc.xlsx Sheet: 1.1a Date: April 9, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

Data in this chapter are presented by academic year (September to August) unless otherwise noted. Note 1.1a, b, c: Student counts are shown as of November 1. Applications and offers are for the fall admissions cycle. Selectivity = offers ÷ applications and represents the proportion of applicants who were offered admission. Yield = registration ÷ offers. Domestic students are defined as citizens (living in Canada or abroad) or permanent residents of Canada.

6 Undergraduate Studies Figure 1.1b Applications, Offers, Registrations, Selectivity and Yield of Domestic First-Year Undergraduates, 2010 to 2019

8,000

6,000

4,000

2,000

0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Applications 5,612 5,892 6,359 6,662 7,229 7,705 7,588 8,053 7,791 7,351 Offers 2,733 2,665 2,400 2,510 2,272 2,302 2,239 2,128 2,350 2,526 Registrations 967 931 894 938 782 812 843 734 780 821 Selectivity 0.49 0.45 0.38 0.38 0.31 0.30 0.30 0.26 0.30 0.34 Yield 0.35 0.35 0.37 0.37 0.34 0.35 0.38 0.34 0.33 0.33

Figure 1.1b Figure 1.1c Applications,Domestic Offers, Students: Registrations, Applications, Selectivity andOffers, Yield Registrations, of International Selectivity and First-YearYield Undergraduates, of First-Year 2010Undergraduates, to 2019 2010 to 2019

6,000 Chapter: Ch.1 - Undergraduate 5,000Excel Filename: 1.1a-c - UG - Yield+Selectivity - 10-19 (AR20 1.1) - v1fc.xlsx Sheet: 1.1b 4,000 Date: May 28, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert 3,000

2,000

1,000

0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Applications 1,834 1,989 2,386 2,664 2,866 3,284 3,830 4,245 5,481 4,912 Offers 596 682 749 799 770 901 887 855 1,030 1,411 Registrations 221 272 286 327 324 380 362 271 282 381 Selectivity 0.32 0.34 0.31 0.30 0.27 0.27 0.23 0.20 0.19 0.29 Yield 0.37 0.40 0.38 0.41 0.42 0.42 0.41 0.32 0.27 0.27

Figure 1.1c International Students: Applications, Offers, Registrations, Selectivity and Yield of First-Year Undergraduates, 2010 to 2019 Undergraduate Studies 7

Chapter: Ch.1 - Undergraduate Excel Filename: 1.1a-c - UG - Yield+Selectivity - 10-19 (AR20 1.1) - v1fc.xlsx Sheet: 1.1c Date: April 9, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert Figure 1.2a Ontario Secondary School Averages of Incoming First-Year Undergraduates, 2010 to 2019

95% 93.6% 93.2% 93.2% 93.0% 92.4% 92.4% 91.7% 91.3% 90.4% 90% 89.2%

85%

80% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Entrance Average

Figure 1.2b Two-Year Retention Rate, 2010 to 2017 Figure 1.2a Ontario Secondary School Averages of Incoming First-Year Undergraduates, 2010 to 2019 94.8% 95% 94.0% 93.8% Retention Rate 92.7% 92.9% (By Cohort, ≤ 2yrs)

91.1% Chapter: Ch.1 - Undergraduate 91.3% Excel Filename: 1.2 - UG Yr1-2 Retention - cf Ent Avg - 10-19 (AR20 1.2) - v2fr.xlsx 90% Sheet: 1.2a Entr Avg 88.2% Date: April 30, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

85%

80% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Note 1.2a: Entrance average is derived from data provided by the Ontario Universities’ Application Centre, and therefore only reflects Ontario secondary school students. Note 1.2b: Two-year retention rate is the proportion of students who successfully move on to second year within two years of beginning their studies. Figure 1.2b Retention Rate Between First and Second Year (within 2 years), 2010 to 2019 8 Undergraduate Studies

Chapter: Ch.1 - Undergraduate Excel Filename: 1.2 - UG Yr1-2 Retention - cf Ent Avg - 10-19 (AR20 1.2) - v2fr.xlsx Sheet: 1.2b Retention (2-yr) Date: May 1, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert Figure 1.3 Incoming First-Year Undergraduates by Program, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

1,265 1,205 1,203 1,180 1,192 1,202 167 1,106 205 182 198 211 1,065 1,062 227 1,005 131 188 180 184 109 108 105 133 125 173 120 108 TrackOne 110 91 48 97 93 109 109 91 30 108 ChemE 21 96 87 29 37 32 70 76 89 84 31 84 95 82 24 31 130 CivE 179 79 22 171 179 112 100 125 118 89 MinE 132 64 84 95 92 CompE ElecE 282 314 317 291 279 259 295 235 269 262 EngSci MechE 102 124 125 89 100 106 110 99 90 91 IndE 61 71 81 51 59 58 63 49 59 65 49 62 55 71 55 52 48 50 50 58 MSE 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20

Figure 1.4a All UndergraduatesFigure 1.3 by Program, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 Incoming Undergraduates by Program, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

5,565 5,489 5,441 5,241Chapter:5,311Ch.1 - Undergraduate220 5,298 5,235 5,280 5,090 208 190 4,936 Excel Filename:178 2011.3 - UG Yr1 - Incoming - by Prog 10-19 (AR20189 1.3) 190- v3fc.xlsx239 206 609 640 601 217 534Sheet: 5391.3 550 511 512 502 Date: May 1, 2020 495 530 508 503 556 562Geoff Wichert 493 466 468 Prepared by: 131 535 136 94 89 87 75 528 134 138 99 TrackOne 72 532 613 665 417 443 485 786 778 894 409 ChemE

931 920 944 897 846 CivE 901 943 697 700 549 MinE CompE 995 1,038 974 1,010 940 1,024 974 974 996 926 ElecE EngSci 876 860 866 828 811 814 811 822 806 854 MechE IndE 368 408 416 409 433 443 489 480 488 511 209 218 219 229 226 215 213 212 208 208 MSE 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20

Note 1.3: Student counts are shown as of November 1. Note 1.4a: IncludesFigure full- and 1.7 part-time students and those working full time through the Professional Experience Year Co-op Program (PEY Co-op). Does Undergraduatesnot count students with by special Program, (non-degree) 2010–2011 status. Student to 2019–2020 counts shown as of November 1.

Chapter: Ch.1 - Undergraduate Excel Filename: 1.7 - UG Headcount by Dept - 10-19 (AR20 1.7) - Undergraduatev3fc.xlsx Studies 9 Sheet: 1.7 Date: May 1, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert Figure 1.4b All Undergraduates by Program, Year of Study and Professional Experience Year Co-op, 2019–2020

TrackOne 239 239

ChemE 125 116 104 64 103 512

CivE 95 91 109 65 108 468 8 9 MinE 36 75 1012 CompE 136 198 182 126 252 894

ElecE 69 130 132 125 93 549

EngSci 294 205 182 114 215 1,010

MechE 132 191 170 125 196 814

IndE 73 127 120 68 123 511 21 MSE 61 41 41 44 208

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 PEY Co-op Year 4

Engineering Science Majors Enrolment Aerospace Engineering 36 Biomedical Systems Engineering 53 Electrical and Computer Engineering 60 Energy Systems Engineering 8 Infrastructure Engineering 7 Machine Intelligence 59 Mathematics, Statistics and Finance 46 Engineering Physics 23 Robotics Engineering 107 Total: 399

Figure 1.6 Undergraduates by Program, Year of Study and Professional Experience Year Co-op, 2019–2020

Note 1.4b: Student counts are shown as of November 1, 2019. Engineering Science Majors show only students in Year 3 and Year 4 and do not count students on PEY Co-op. Chapter: Ch.1 - Undergraduate Excel Filename: 1.6 - UG Headcount by Dept+YOS+PEY - 19-20 (AR20 1.6) - v1fc.xlsx Sheet: 1.6 10 Undergraduate Studies Date: April 9, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert Figure 1.5a Undergraduate Student-to-Faculty Ratios by Academic Area, 2019–2020

ChemE 14.1

CivMin 11.0

ECE 15.2

MIE 19.6

MSE 10.0

Total 16.7

Figure 1.10a Figure 1.5b UndergraduateUndergraduate Full-Time Student-Faculty Equivalent Student-to-Faculty Ratios by Academic Ratios, 2010–2011 Area, 2019–2020 to 2019–2020

19.0 19.2 19.0 18.6 18.9 Chapter: Ch.118.4 - Undergraduate 18.4 Excel Filename: 1.10a - UGrad Student-Faculty Ratio - by dept17.0 - 19-20 (AR2016.5 1.10a)16.7 - v1fc.xlsx Sheet: 1.10a (bars) Date: May 5, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20

Figure 1.10b Undergraduate Full-Time Equivalent Students per Faculty Member, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

Note 1.5a, b: Student and faculty counts are shown as of November 1, 2019. For full-time equivalency (FTE), each part-time student is countedChapter: as 0.3 FTE.Ch.2 Students - Graduate with special Studies (non-degree) status or on PEY Co-op are not included. Faculty counts includeExcel tenure-stream Filename: and teaching-stream2.2a+1.10b - faculty.UG+Grad Student-Faculty Ratio - overall - 10-19 (AR20 2.2a+1.10b) - v1fc.xlsx Sheet: 1.10b Date: April 22, 2020 Undergraduate Studies 11 Figure 1.6a Undergraduate Participation in Summer Research Opportunities, 2011 to 2020

359

35 307 319 291 286 282 324 270 268 30 43 76 88 64 58 202 261 64 243 18 218 231 231 175 212 204 184 175

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

U of T Abroad Online

Figure 1.6b Undergraduate Participation in Summer Research Opportunities by Academic Area, 2020

ResearchFigure 1.6a Online Participation:Undergraduate Participation in Summer Research Opportunities, ChemE2011 to 2020 20 CivE & MinE 13 ECE 33 EngSci Chapter: Ch.477 - Cross-Faculty MIE 21 1.6a+b - UGrad SRO - 2020 (AR20 1.6a+b) - v1f.xlsx MSE Excel Filename: 8 TrackOne Sheet: 1.6a3 Total Date:175June 27, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

Figure 1.7a Number of Engineering Undergraduate Students Participating in PEY Co-op with Percentage Participation, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

73.5% Figure 1.6b 70.7% 65.9% 65.6% 66.2% 66.0% Undergraduate Participation in63.3% Summer Research Opportunities, 59.2% 56.3% Summer 2020 853 51.1% 790 779 724 734 721 Chapter: Ch.1 705- Undergraduate 632 Excel581 Filename: 1.6a+b - UGrad SRO - 2020 (AR20 1.6a+b) - v1f.xlsx 554 Sheet: 1.6b Date: June 27, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20

Note 1.7a: Percentage participation is calculated by dividing the number of completed PEY Co-op positions by the number of eligible students (i.e. the third-year cohort from the previous year).

12 UndergraduateFigure 1.7a Studies Number of Engineering Undergraduate Students Participating in PEY Co-op with Percentage Participation, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

Chapter: Ch.4 - Cross-Faculty Education Excel Filename: 4.3a-c - PEY Placements - Cdn+Intl - 1011-1920 (AR20 4.3a-c) - v4.xlsx Sheet: 1.7a Date: May 31, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert Figure 1.7b Number of Canadian and International PEY Co-op Positions, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

Other Canadian U.S. International Total Positions Positions Positions Positions 2010–11 530 11 13 554 2011–12 547 26 8 581 2012–13 592 24 16 632 2013–14 644 36 25 705 2014–15 663 42 19 724 2015–16 711 50 29 790 2016–17 669 49 16 734 2017–18 713 48 18 779 2018–19 768 64 21 853 2019–20 673 37 11 721

Figure 1.7c NumberFigure of4.3b PEY Co-op Employers, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 Number of Canadian and International PEY Co-op Positions, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 PEY Co-op Employers who Hired Engineering Students 2010–11 Chapter: Ch.4 - Cross-Faculty185 Education 2011–12Excel Filename: 4.3a-c -221 PEY Placements - Cdn+Intl - 1011-1920 (AR20 4.3a-c) - v3.xlsx 2012–13 Sheet: 4.3b 241 2013–14 Date: May 7, 2020304 2014–15 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert317 2015–16 310 2016–17 337 2017–18 318 2018–19 368 2019–20 357

Figure 4.3c PEY Co-op Employers, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

Chapter: Ch.4 - Cross-Faculty Education Excel Filename: 4.3a-c - PEY Placements - Cdn+Intl - 1011-1920 (AR20 4.3a-c) - v2.xlsx Sheet: 4.3c Date: May 5, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

Undergraduate Studies 13 Figure 1.8a Number of Awards Received by Cohort with Total Number of Undergraduate Need-Based Award Recipients, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

1,877 1,796 1,711 1,746 1,691 1,693 1,670 602 460 1,641 543 1,595 446 422 460 1,557 488 425 512 490

424 407 368 428 412 453 379 399 387 389 442 429 462 428 471 435 402 380 349 386 Year 4 470 Year 3 453 445 415 389 370 368 369 350 Year 2 270 Year 1

2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20

Figure 1.8a Number of Awards Received by Cohort with Total Number of Figure 1.8b Total ValueUndergraduate of Undergraduate Need-Based Financial AwardAssistance Recipients, and Percentage Distributed by Year2010–2011 of Study, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 to 2019–2020

$16.3M

34%

Chapter: Ch.1 - Undergraduate $12.2M $12.0M $12.0M Excel Filename: 1.8a+b - UG Student$11.1M Aid - 1011-1920 (AR20 1.8a+b) - v1.xlsx 32% Sheet: 1.8a $10.3M $10.2M 33% 23% 32% $9.2M $9.2M $9.2M 19% Date: June 17, 202026% 36% 23% Prepared24% by: Geoff 25% Wichert 25% 23% 24% 24% 26% 24% 22% 24% 22% 25% 24% 27% 23% 21% 23% 24% 23% 21% 23% 23% 31% 27% 28% 29% 23% 22% 22% 22% 16%

2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20

Year 4 $2,130,098 $2,229,278 $2,296,173 $2,725,785 $3,534,244 $3,853,161 $3,644,310 $3,940,729 $5,515,858 $2,804,242 Year 3 $2,049,237 $2,205,736 $2,061,174 $2,429,321 $2,871,229 $2,839,851 $2,570,428 $2,913,413 $3,132,480 $3,043,391 Year 2 $2,157,800 $2,185,640 $2,160,969 $2,781,695 $2,289,069 $2,792,715 $2,335,933 $2,545,499 $3,831,175 $2,911,406 Year 1 $2,886,898Year 4 $2,580,676 $2,687,414 $2,372,994 $2,450,470 $2,700,169 $1,662,682 $2,642,454 $3,788,693 $3,236,557 Total $9,224,033 $9,201,330 $9,205,730 $10,309,795 $11,145,012 $12,185,896 $10,213,353 $12,042,095 $16,268,206 $11,995,596 Year 3 Year 2 Year 1

Note 1.8a, b: Data comes from the Student Accounts Reporting Cube.

Figure 1.8b Total Value of Undergraduate Financial Assistance and 14 UndergraduatePercentage Studies Distributed by Year of Study 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

Chapter: Ch.1 - Undergraduate Excel Filename: 1.8a+b - UG Student Aid - 1011-1920 (AR20 1.8a+b) - v1.xlsx Sheet: 1.8b Date: June 17, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert Figure 1.9 Undergraduate Degrees Awarded by Program, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

1,123 1,100 1,080 1,050 1,052 1,020 141 118 98 961 966 937 96 115 138 899 100 98 95 115 112 91 105 15 11 100 135 23 105 104 28 22 111 140 30 104 21 223 251 ChemE 13 157 215 13 106 17 132 103 205 CivE 101 116 86 127 126 73 MinE 148 161 131 117 97 155 CompE 208 202 145 165 205 175 155 ElecE 188 165 162 EngSci 197 192 206 203 183 194 191 MechE 157 157 167 IndE 65 87 76 85 84 88 96 98 114 115 42 49 42 39 44 42 41 41 39 40 MSE 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20

Figure 1.10 U of T Engineering Degrees Awarded by Academic Area Compared with Canadian andFigure North American1.9 Degree Totals, 2018 Undergraduate Degrees Awarded by Program, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

8.4% ChemE 1.0% Chapter: Ch.1 - Undergraduate 4.1% CivMinExcel Filename: 1.9+3.4 - UG Degrees Awarded by Dept+Gender - 10-11 to 19-20 (AR20 1.9a+b) - v1f.xlsx 0.8% Sheet: 1.9 8.9% ECE Date: June 19, 2020 1.2% Prepared by: Geoff Wichert 35.0% EngSci 11.8% 6.0% MIE 0.7% 19.0% MSE U of T Percentage of Canadian 1.9% Engineering Degrees 6.4% Total U of T Percentage of North American 0.7% Engineering Degrees

Figure 1.10 Note 1.9: Data reported byU academic of T Engineering year (September Degrees to August). Awarded by Academic Area Note 1.10: Data sourced fromCompared reports produced with byCanadian Engineers Canada and Northand the AmericanAmerican Society Degree for Engineering Totals Education; 2018 is the most recent year for which reports from both these institutions have been published. Total percentages show U of T as a proportion of all engineering degrees in 2018North America, including those awarded in fields for which U of T does not have a specific degree program (e.g. Biomedical, Environmental, Software, etc.).

Chapter: Ch.1 - Undergraduate Excel Filename: 1.10 - UG Degrees Awarded by Dept - % of Cdn+US+NAmUndergraduate totals - 20 Studies18 (AR20 1.10) 15 - v1.xlsx Sheet: 1.10 Date: June 19, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert Figure 1.11a Number of Students and Percentage of Class Graduating with Honours, 2011 to 2020

47.7% 44.3% Percentage of 42.9% Graduates with 40.5% 38.3% 38.1% Honours or 35.5% High Honours 34.2% 31.9% 1,123 1,100 25.9% 1,050 1,052 1,080 1,020 90 119 96 961 966 937 78 86 899 75 365 322 368 419 329 308 333 316 365 233

Graduates with High Honours

Graduates with Honours 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Figure 1.11b Number of Students on the Dean’s Honour List by Term and Academic Area, FigureFall 20151.11a to Winter 2020 Number of Students and Percentage of Class Graduating with Honours,2,429 2011 to 2020 109 228

1,934 214 1,912 1,906 1,876 1,902 63 1,863 75 68 66 56 1,789 1,804 1,792 18 80 48 219 212 169Chapter:225Ch.1 - Undergraduate221 63 72 215 186 381 186 182 TrackOne 160 173Excel Filename:165 1681.11a+b - Dean's Honour150 List - 11-20 (AR20 1.11a+b) - v2.xlsx 142 137 159 142 30 34 21 Sheet:181.11a 14 ChemE 20 10 13 15 181 207 210 272 Date:257June 19, 2020 283 296 264 CivE Prepared by: Geoff Wichert 306 296 218 206 196 MinE 222 180 161 198 184 142 563 CompE 445 432 501 460 454 444 ElecE 424 423 457 98 EngSci 65 86 87 236 57 67 70 61 72 56 144 172 162 MechE 133 132 135 147 173 137 401 IndE 312 334 308 304 283 317 272 284 293 MSE

Fall Winter Fall Winter Fall Winter Fall Winter Fall Winter 2015 2016 2016 2017 2017 2018 2018 2019 2019 2020

Note 1.11a: Students are normally eligible to be considered for Honours standing only if they are carrying a full academic load (2.5 credits per session, excluding extra courses) and if the session is not being repeated. During fourth year, a student may reduce their course loadFigure in either 1.11b semester (but not both) and still be eligible for Honours standing, provided the other conditions are met. Note 1.11b:Number The 2020 of Winter Students term results on reflect the Dean's several impacts Hono dueur toList COVID-19 by Term adaptations. and Academic Moving all classes Area, to online formats necessitated adjustments both to specific assignments and to overall grading schemes. Additionally, for this term only, students were permitted 2015–2016to apply a Credit to or 2019–2020No Credit (CR/NCR) option, rather than a percentage grade, to any of their courses, or even to drop a failed course, after seeing their final grades. Sessional grades used to determine honour status were calculated using only those cours- es that students chose to have recorded as a percentage grade. A minimum of 4 such percentage grades were required to be consid- ered for the Dean’s Honour List. Chapter: Ch.1 - Undergraduate Excel Filename: 1.11a+b - Dean's Honour List - 11-20 (AR20 1.11a+b) - v2.xlsx 16 Undergraduate StudiesSheet: 1.11b Date: June 19, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert Figure 1.12a Number of Completed Minors and Percentage of Graduating Students Completing an Engineering Minor, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

40% % of Graduating Class 38% Completing a Minor

34% 33% 481 31% Music Performance 30% 442 1 4 419 47 Artificial Intelligence 26% 3 11 15 3 13 365 367 5 12 32 Nanoengineering 23% 346 33 1 3 85 Biomedical Engineering 1 4 92 19% 50 65 69 80 18% 261 Advanced Manufacturing 236 Robotics & Mechatronics 40 127 171 189 25 134 154 163 165 194 10 Engineering Business 15 56 103 74 Sustainable Energy 77 78 108 93 75 76 45 33 70 40 Environmental Engineering 43 34 42 35 31 34 29 24 56 20 44 43 28 29 34 36 39 41 35 Bioengineering 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20

Footnote: A total of 481 minors were completed by 431 students, with many students completing more than one minor. Figure 1.12b Students Graduating with an Engineering Business Minor or Certificate, 2011–2012 to 2019–2020 Figure 1.12a Number of Completed Minors and Percentage of41% Graduating Class Completing an Engineering Minor, 36% 2010–2011 to 2019–202034% 34% 35% 443 28% 384 396 Excel Filename: 1.12a+b - Minor Completions363 - 1011-1920 (AR20 1.12a+b) - v1f.xlsx 23% 356 Sheet: 1.12a - Grads w Minors 290Date: June 19, 2020 249 14% 231 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert230 192 220 222 163 Percentage of Graduating 134 Students with an Engineering 2% 117 Business Minor or Certificate Chart Labels: 78 194 154 171 165 Engineering Business Certificate Bioengineering 127 134 15 Environmental103 Engineering 56 15 Engineering Business Minor Sustainable Energy 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20 Engineering Business Robotics & Mechatronics Artificial Intelligence Engineering Advanced Manufacturing NanoengineeringFigure 1.12b Biomedical EngineeringStudents Graduating with an Engineering Business Minor Music Performanceor Certificate, 2011–2012 to 2019–2020 % of Graduating Class Completing a Minor

Note 1.12a: A total of 481 minors were completed by 431 students in 2019–2020, with many students completing more than one minor. Excel Filename: 1.12a+b - Minor Completions - 1011-1920 (AR20 1.12a+b) - v1f.xlsx Sheet: 1.12b - Business Minor+Cert Date: June 19, 2020 Undergraduate Studies 17 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

Chart Labels: Engineering Business Minor

Engineering Business Certificate Percentage of Graduating Students with an Engineering Business Minor or Certificate Figure 1.13 New Undergraduate Courses Launched, 2019–2020

Course Term Title APS191H1 S Track One Seminar CHE191H1 S Introduction to Chemical Engineering CIV191H1 S Introduction to Civil Engineering ECE499H1 F/S Thesis ECE499Y1 Y Thesis ECE520H1 F Power Electronics ECE526H1 S Power System Protection and Automation MIE369H1 S Introduction to Artificial Intelligence MIN191H1 S Introduction to Mineral Engineering MSE120H1 S Materials Engineering, Processing and Applications MSE191H1 S Introduction to Materials Science & Engineering MSE296H1 F Materials Paradigm at a Glance MSE297H1 S Materials Paradigm at a Glance MSE478H1 S Materials Manufacturing and Design TEP327H1 S Engineering & Law TEP448H1 S System Mapping

18 Undergraduate Studies Graduate student Teng Cui (MSE) CHAPTER 2 was part of a U of T Engineering research team that this year measured mechanical fatigue in graphene for the first time. GRADUATE The material can withstand more than a billion cycles of high stress before breaking. PHOTO: DARIA PEREVEZENTSEV STUDIES

FACTS & FIGURES 6.8 41 $52.3 M Average graduate student- Number of direct-entry PhD Total graduate student to-faculty ratio, representing students in 2019–2020, up funding, up from $33.3 M 2,636 larger lab groups with a from only 6 a decade ago. over the past 10 years. greater potential for Total graduate student impactful research. cohort, an increase of 57.9% over the past decade. Figure 2.1a Domestic and International MASc Students: Applications, Offers, Registrations, Selectivity and Yield, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

Domestic International 1,400 1,400

1,200 1,200

1,000 1,000

800 800

600 600

400 400

200 200

0 0 2010– 2011– 2012– 2013– 2014– 2015– 2016– 2017– 2018– 2019– 2010– 2011– 2012– 2013– 2014– 2015– 2016– 2017– 2018– 2019– 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Applications 614 539 563 540 536 598 633 642 556 547 Applications 766 926 1,088 1,086 1,050 1,015 1,022 1,276 1,263 1,368 Offers 244 226 253 274 206 265 275 289 238 232 Offers 61 75 78 77 66 65 76 84 98 94 Registrations 209 189 215 235 175 221 234 245 194 204 Registrations 53 58 62 60 52 48 65 68 82 76 Selectivity 0.40 0.42 0.45 0.51 0.38 0.44 0.43 0.45 0.43 0.42 Selectivity 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.07 Yield 0.86 0.84 0.85 0.86 0.85 0.83 0.85 0.85 0.82 0.88 Yield 0.87 0.77 0.79 0.78 0.79 0.74 0.86 0.81 0.84 0.81

Applications Offers Registrations

Figure 2.1b Domestic and International PhD Students: Applications, Offers, Registrations, Selectivity and Yield, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 Figure 2.4 Domestic and International MASc Students: Applications,Domestic Offers, Registrations, Selectivity and Yield,International 900 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 900

800 800

700 700 Chapter: Ch.2 - Graduate Studies 600 Excel Filename: 2.3-2.5 - Grad Yield+Selectivity by Prog600 - 10-19 (AR20 2.3-2.5) - v2.xlsx Sheet: 2.4 500 Date: April 28, 2020 500 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert 400 400

300 300

200 200

100 100

0 0 2010– 2011– 2012– 2013– 2014– 2015– 2016– 2017– 2018– 2019– 2010– 2011– 2012– 2013– 2014– 2015– 2016– 2017– 2018– 2019– 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Applications 273 274 226 215 226 239 227 217 271 242 Applications 578 686 746 621 625 614 626 841 787 887 Offers 146 159 120 121 124 131 125 135 152 131 Offers 51 73 93 89 84 85 90 97 154 191 Registrations 131 139 107 110 109 117 117 118 145 121 Registrations 37 46 72 73 69 66 72 70 116 159 Selectivity 0.53 0.58 0.53 0.56 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.62 0.56 0.54 Selectivity 0.09 0.11 0.12 0.14 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.12 0.20 0.22 Yield 0.90 0.87 0.89 0.91 0.88 0.89 0.94 0.87 0.95 0.92 Yield 0.73 0.63 0.77 0.82 0.82 0.78 0.80 0.72 0.75 0.83

Applications Offers Registrations

Data in this chapter are presented by academic year (September to August) unless otherwise noted.

20 Graduate StudiesFigure 2.3 Domestic and International PhD Students: Applications, Offers, Registrations, Selectivity and Yield, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

Chapter: Ch.2 - Graduate Studies Excel Filename: 2.3-2.5 - Grad Yield+Selectivity by Prog - 10-19 (AR20 2.3-2.5) - v3.xlsx Sheet: 2.3 Date: May 5, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert Figure 2.1c Domestic and International MEng and MHSc Students: Applications, Offers, Registrations, Selectivity and Yield, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

Domestic International 2,000 2,000

1,500 1,500

1,000 1,000

500 500

0 0 2010– 2011– 2012– 2013– 2014– 2015– 2016– 2017– 2018– 2019– 2010– 2011– 2012– 2013– 2014– 2015– 2016– 2017– 2018– 2019– 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Applications 545 628 578 692 734 794 881 784 737 736 Applications 239 316 478 711 932 1,171 1,292 1,531 1,695 2,021 Offers 284 386 307 411 450 461 506 498 441 386 Offers 50 102 150 240 359 429 486 517 580 740 Registrations 217 295 254 290 282 311 299 309 272 235 Registrations 27 53 82 112 162 223 235 224 287 336 Selectivity 0.52 0.61 0.53 0.59 0.61 0.58 0.57 0.64 0.60 0.52 Selectivity 0.21 0.32 0.31 0.34 0.39 0.37 0.38 0.34 0.34 0.37 Yield 0.76 0.76 0.83 0.71 0.63 0.67 0.59 0.62 0.62 0.61 Yield 0.54 0.52 0.55 0.47 0.45 0.52 0.48 0.43 0.49 0.45

Applications Offers Registrations

Figure 2.2a Graduate Students by Degree Type, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 Figure 2.5 Domestic and International MEng and MHSc Students: 2,636 Applications, Offers, Registrations, Selectivity and Yield,2 ,498 2 415 991 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 2 365 , , 911 2,259 899 2,194 880 2 064 815 , 712 1 933 , 604 1,842 Chapter: Ch.2 - Graduate Studies Excel Filename:544 2.3-2.5 - Grad Yield+Selectivity by Prog - 10-19 (AR20 2.3-2.5) - v2.xlsx 1,669 529 Sheet: 2.5 406 Date: April 28, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert 635 676 622 606 563 608 670 587 580 568 1010 911 876 881 877 846 802 838 MEng & 695 733 MHSc

MASc

PhD

2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20

Note 2.1 a, b, c: Student counts are shown as of November 1. Selectivity = offers ÷ applications and represents the proportion of applicants who were offered admission. Yield = registration ÷ offers. Domestic students are defined as citizens (living in Canada or abroad) or permanent residents of Canada. Students who have fast-tracked from MASc programs into PhD programs are counted in these figures as applications, offers and admissions.

Figure 2.2a Graduate Students by Degree Type, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020Graduate Studies 21

Chapter: Ch.2 - Graduate Studies Filename: 2.1a+b - Grad Headcount by Degree 10-19 (AR20 2.1a+b) - v1fc.xlsx Sheet: 2.2a (no split) Date: May 5, 2020

Legend:

3 MEng & MHSc 2 MASc 1 PhD Figure 2.2b Graduate Enrolment by Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) and Headcount (HC) by Academic Area, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

UTIAS BME ChemE CivMin ECE MIE MSE Total FTE 140.9 168.0 195.4 212.6 403.0 339.2 68.5 1,527.6 2010–2011 HC 143 168 208 256 431 391 72 1,669 FTE 143.2 199.0 202.3 229.8 437.7 382.6 68.2 1,662.8 2011–2012 HC 146 199 217 276 479 454 71 1,842 FTE 146.7 208.3 193.2 243.3 504.8 387.2 68.2 1,751.7 2012–2013 HC 153 209 203 279 565 453 71 1,933 FTE 162.1 219.0 209.9 290.5 509.8 436.2 90.9 1,918.4 2013–2014 HC 167 219 219 322 556 488 93 2,064 FTE 182.4 228.0 238.0 293.1 531.5 511.2 80.3 2,064.5 2014–2015 HC 188 228 245 312 577 563 81 2,194 FTE 143.2 241.0 253.0 299.4 591.5 532.9 79.0 2,140.0 2015–2016 HC 146 241 260 326 637 570 79 2,259 FTE 178.2 269.0 245.0 306.3 577.0 580.3 92.3 2,248.1 2016–2017 HC 181 269 252 335 619 616 93 2,365 FTE 170.1 296.0 246.7 313.0 551.5 602.8 94.9 2,275.0 2017–2018 HC 175 303 253 348 597 642 97 2,415 FTE 191.4 283.3 219.5 304.0 618.8 658.0 94.9 2,369.9 2018–2019 HC 197 291 223 332 658 700 97 2,498 FTE 226.2 327.1 235.0 349.9 630.2 641.8 95.6 2,505.8 2019–2020 HC 236 332 242 380 668 681 97 2,636

Figure 2.3aFigure Undergraduate 2.1c and Graduate Full-Time Equivalent Student-to-Faculty Ratios, Enrolment2010–2011 by Full-Timeto 2019–2020 Equivalent (FTE) and Headcount (HC) by Academic Area 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

28.5 28.5 28.3 26.6 27.1 26.9 26.8 26.7 27.1 25.9 6.7 6.4 6.5 6.1 6.4Chapter:6.5Ch.2 - Graduate Studies 6.5 6.8 6.8 6.0 Excel Filename: 2.1c - Grad Headcount+FTE by Dept - 10-19 (AR20 2.1c) - v1fc.xlsx Sheet: 2.1c 2.6 3.1 3.4 1.3 1.6 1.7 Date:2.0April 22, 2020 3.3 3.6 19.2 3.4 18.6 18.9 19.0 18.4 19.0 18.4 17.0 16.5 16.7

Research Stream (MASc & PhD) Professional Stream (MEng & MHSc) Undergraduate Student-Faculty Ratio 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20

Note 2.2a, b: Student counts are shown as of November 1. Note 2.3a:Figure To allow 2.2a more accurate comparisons, undergraduate FTEs are determined by counting each part-time student as 0.3 FTE. Graduate and Undergraduate Full-Time Equivalent Students per Faculty Member, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

22 Graduate Studies Chapter: Ch.2 - Graduate Studies Excel Filename: 2.2a+1.10b - UG+Grad Student-Faculty Ratio - overall - 10-19 (AR20 2.2a+1.10b) - v1fc.xlsx Sheet: 2.2a Date: April 22, 2020

Footnote: To allow more accurate comparisons, undergraduate FTEs are determined by counting each part-time students as 0.3 FTE.

Research Stream (MASc & PhD) Professional Stream (MEng & MHSc) Undergraduate Student-Faculty Ratio Figure 2.3b Full-Time Equivalent Graduate Student-to-Faculty Ratios by Academic Area and Degree Type, 2019–2020

22.98 Overall 4.19 2.64 3.59 10.42 4.85

UTIAS 4.33 3.94 4.29 12.57

5.71 ChemE 4.15 2.27 2.57 8.99

CivMin 3.15 2.29 3.30 8.74 12.41

ECE 3.68 2.32 2.79 8.79

MEng & MHSc MIE 3.72 2.74 5.53 11.99 MASc

MSE 3.84 1.32 1.56 6.72 PhD BME

Figure 2.3c Ratio of Undergraduate to Graduate Full-Time Equivalent Students, 2010–2011Figure 2.2c to 2019–2020 Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Graduate Student-Faculty Ratios by Academic Area and Degree Type, 2019 2020 40% – Goal = 40% 35.6% 36.1% 33.9% 35% 32.9% 30.7% 31.5% Chapter: Ch.2 - Graduate29.8% Studies 30% 27.3% 27.9% Excel26.2% Filename: 2.2c - Grad Stud-Faculty Ratio Analysis - by dept - 19-20 (AR20 2.2c) - v1fc.xlsx 2505.8 25% Sheet: 2.2c Date: April 22, 2020 2248.1 4439.8 20% Prepared by: Geoff Wichert1918.4 4579.9 2019–20 1527.6 4516.7 2016–17 15% 4299.6 Goal 2013–14 10% 2010–11 40.0% 60.0% 5% Graduate

Undergraduate 0% 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20

Figure 2.2b Note 2.3b: SomeRatio students of Undergraduate in BME are supervised to Graduate by faculty members Full-Time from theEquivalent Faculties of Students, Medicine and Dentistry and affiliated hos- pitals, as well2009–2010 as from other to departments 2019–2020 within U of T Engineering. Because the ratio includes only faculty with a budgetary appoint- ment in BME, comparisons with other Engineering departments are not possible. For that reason, this figure shows BME in a visually distinct way. In cases of inter-departmental supervision within the Faculty, PhD and MASc students are assigned 100% to their primary supervisor’s department. Note 2.3c: Students on PEY Co-op are not included in this count.

Chapter: Ch.2 - Graduate Excel Filename: 2.2b - UG-to-Grad Ratio - 10-19 (AR20 2.2a) - v1fc.xlsx Sheet: 2.2b Graduate Studies 23 Date: April 30, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

Graduate Undergraduate Figure 2.4a Graduate Student Funding by Category, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019

$52.3M $50.9M $48.4M $10.2M $9.5M $44.8M $44.7M $45.4M $10.4M

$41.3M $9.7M $10.2M $10.2M $38.2M $9.7M $22.2M $21.4M $36.0M $9.0M $18.8M $33.3M $8.9M $16.4M $16.1M $16.5M $7.1M $13.6M $12.7M $12.0M $12.1M

$20.7M $19.2M $19.2M $18.0M $18.7M $18.4M $18.7M $16.5M Scholarships $14.2M $15.0M Faculty & Department Funds

Research Funds

2009–10 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19

Figure 2.4b Graduate StudentFigure Funding2.6a by Category and Academic Area, 2018–2019 Graduate Student Funding by Category, 2009-2010 to 2018-2019

UTIAS $0.5M $2.9M $0.8M $4.2M

Chapter: Ch.2 - Graduate Studies BMEExcel Filename:$2.2M 2.6a$2.1M - Grad$1.9M Student$6.2M funding - by category - 0910-1819 - (AR20 2.6a) - v1.xlsx Sheet: 2.6a Date: April 28, 2020 ChemE Prepared$2.6M by: Geoff$2.1M Wichert$1.0M $5.7M

CivMin $3.3M $2.6M $1.1M $7.0M

ECE $7.2M $5.0M $3.3M $15.4M

Scholarships MIE $4.1M $5.9M $1.7M $11.6M Faculty & Department Funds $0.8M MSE $2.1M $0.9M $0.4M Research Funds

Note 2.4a, b: Data were obtained from the new Student Accounts Reporting Cube. Data for previous annual reports were obtained from the Graduate Student Income Reporting Cube. For more information, see Data Sources.

Figure 2.6b Graduate Student Funding by Category and Academic Area, 24 Graduate2018–2019 Studies

Chapter: Ch.2 - Graduate Studies Excel Filename: 2.6b - Grad Student funding - by category+dept - 18-19 (AR20 2.6b) - v1.xlsx Sheet: 2.6b Date: April 28, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert Figure 2.5a Total External Graduate Student Scholarships by Source, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019

NSERC and CIHR OGS External – Other Internal Total

2009–10 $4,517,680 $853,334 $79,000 $1,613,187 $7,063,201

2010–11 $4,565,117 $1,036,675 $3,500 $3,287,981 $8,893,273

2011–12 $3,912,883 $1,593,328 $107,332 $3,383,614 $8,997,157

2012–13 $3,513,184 $1,583,333 $146,500 $4,445,431 $9,688,448

2013–14 $4,016,673 $1,236,666 $319,333 $4,094,144 $9,666,816

2014–15 $3,975,701 $1,336,670 $390,333 $4,487,866 $10,190,570

2015–16 $3,875,675 $1,223,331 $366,335 $4,748,300 $10,213,641

2016–17 $3,539,878 $1,360,004 $323,889 $5,157,619 $10,381,390

2017–18 $3,224,719 $1,525,000 $315,267 $4,481,057 $9,546,043

2018–19 $3,390,489 $1,443,333 $490,499 $4,850,987 $10,175,308

Figure 2.5b Number of NSERC and CIHR Graduate Student Award Recipients by Academic Area, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019 Figure 2.5a Total Graduate Student Scholarships by Source, 223 2009–2010 to 2018–2019

23 203

19 Chapter: Ch.2 - Graduate Studies 41 Excel Filename: 2.5a172 - Grad Student171 awards - by source - 0910-1819 (AR20 2.5a) - v3.xlsx 163 166 40 Sheet: 2.5a11 11 13 11 Date:147 July 16, 2020 146 23 Prepared by: Geoff32 Wichert 135 12 43 13 133 25 36 37 11 10 28 39 23 37 20 35 30 22 23 40 17 22 21 21 12 26 30 24 14 16 57 48 46 24 16 44 29 37 27 28 19 21

35 35 31 30 29 27 23 25 25 28 5 6 4 6 7 9 8 7 6 6 2009–10 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19

UTIAS ChemE ECE MSE BME CivMin MIE

Note 2.5a, b: Data were obtained from the new Student Accounts Reporting Cube. Data for previous annual reports were obtained from the Graduate Student Income Reporting Cube. For more information, see Data Sources. Figure 2.7b Number of NSERC and CIHR Graduate Student Award Recipients by Academic Area, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019 Graduate Studies 25

Chapter: Ch.2 - Graduate Studies Excel Filename: 2.7b - Grad Student awards - NSERC+CIHR by dept - 0910-1819 (AR20 2.7b) - v1.xlsx Sheet: 2.7b Date: April 30, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

7 UTIAS 6 IBBME 5 ChemE 4 CivMin 3 ECE 2 MIE 1 MSE Figure 2.6a Number of Students Fast-Tracked from MASc to PhD by Academic Area, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20

UTIAS 525610131056

BME 8 5 8 8 12 14 8 10 14 4

ChemE 48714857566

CivMin 2523155732

ECE 642454361411

MIE 66652813633

MSE 3713422002

Total 34 37 31 43 42 39 41 44 45 34

Figure 2.6b Number of Direct-Entry PhD students by Academic Area, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 Figure 2.6a Number of Students Fast-Tracked from MASc to PhD by Academic Area, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20

UTIAS 2 Chapter: Ch.2 - Graduate Studies BME Excel 65573571Filename: 2.6a+b - MASc to PhD Fast-tracking - 1011-1920 (AR20 2.6a+b)192 - v2f.xlsx 1 Sheet: 2.6a - Fast-Track ChemE Date:1 July 16, 2020 5 1 12 7 CivMin Prepared by: Geoff Wichert 1 24

ECE 222224

MIE Footnote: For counting11 purposes, the academic year is from May to 4April. 23

Total 6 7 6 7 5 12 15 13 27 41

Figure 2.6b Number of Direct-Entry PhD Students by Academic Area, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

Chapter: Ch.2 - Graduate Studies Excel Filename: 2.6a+b - MASc to PhD Fast-tracking - 1011-1920 (AR20 2.6a+b) - v2f.xlsx Sheet: 2.6b - Direct-Entry Date: July 16, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

Footnote: For counting purposes, the academic year is from May to April. Note 2.6a, b: For counting purposes, the academic year is from May to April.

26 Graduate Studies Figure 2.7a Average Time to Completion for PhD, MASc, MEng and MHSc Students, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20

PhDTime to Completion5.3 for 5.0Graduate 5.3 Students 5.2 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.0 5.3 5.0

MASc 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 TimeThe following to Completion figures indicate for the Graduate median time toStudents completion for graduating cohorts in each master’s and MEngdoctoral & MHSc degree (FT) program1.0 by academic 1.0 area 1.3 for the 1.0past decade. 1.0 Time 1.0 to graduation 1.0 represents 1.0 the 1.0 length of 1.0 time between a student’s initial enrolment in a graduate program and meeting all the requirements for The following figures indicate the median time to completion for graduating cohorts in each master’s and TimeMEnggraduation. (ExtFT) to Completion The data only includes for Graduate terms in which Students a student 1.3is registered, 1.7 excluding 1.7 leaves, 1.7 lapses 1.7 and (in most 1.7 doctoral degree program by academic area for the past decade. Time to graduation represents the length of cases) the term in which occurs. Where a student is fast-tracked from the MASc into a PhD, the MEngtime (PT) between a student’s2.3 initial enrolment 2.0 2.0 in a grad 2.0uate program 2.0 and 2.0meeting all 2.3 the requirements 2.0 2.0 for 2.0 total time for both programs is counted. Distinguishing full-time, extended full-time and part-time MEng Thegraduation. following The figures data indicateonly includes the median terms timein which to completion a student isfor registered, graduating excluding cohorts in leaves, each master’slapses and and (in most students provides greater clarity. doctoralcases) the degree term programin which convocationby academic occurs. area for Where the past a stud decade.ent is Time fast-tracked to graduation from the represents MASc into the a length PhD, theof timetotal betweentime for botha student’s programs initial is counted.enrolment Distinguishing in a graduate full-time,program extendedand meeting full-time all the and requirements part-time MEng for graduation.students provides The data greater only includesclarity. terms in which a student is registered, excluding leaves, lapses and (in most Figurecases) 2.7b theFigure Timeterm into2.7a whichCompletion convocation for Graduate occurs. Students Where a – stud Universityent is fast-tracked of Toronto Institutefrom the forMASc Aerospace into a PhD, Studies, the Figuretotal time 2.7bTime for2010–2011 both toUniversity Completionprograms to 2019–2020 ofis counted. Torontofor PhD, Distinguishing InstituteMASc, MEng for Aerospacefull-time, and MHSc extended Studies Graduate full-time Students and part-time MEng students 2010–2011providesTime greater to to 2019–2020 Completionclarity. for Graduate Students, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 Figure 2.7b University of Toronto Institute for Aerospace Studies Time2010–11 to Completion 2011–12 2012–13 for Graduate 2013–14 Students, 2014–15 2010–2011 2015–16 2016–17 to 2019–2020 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20 PhD Chapter:7.0Ch.2 - 4.7Graduate 5.3Studies 5.3 5.7 6.3 5.3 5.0 5.8 6.0 Figure 2.7bExcel Filename:University2.7a of Toronto- Graduate Institute Time-to-Completion for Aerospace - 1011-1920 Studies (AR20 2.7a) - v3 (OCGS).xlsx MASc 2010–112.0 2011–12 2.0 2012–13 2.0 2013–14 2.2 2014–15 2.0 2015–16 2.0 2016–17 2.0 2017–18 2.0 2018–19 2.0 2019–20 2.0 TimeSheet: to Completion2.7a for Graduate Students, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 PhD 7.0 4.7 5.3 5.3 5.7 6.3 5.3 5.0 5.8 6.0 MEng (FT) Date:1.3July 16, 1.3 2020 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 MEngMASc (Ext FT) Prepared2010–11 by:2.0Geoff 2011–12 Wichert 2.0 2012–13 2.0 2013–14 2.2 2014–151.7 2.0 2015–16 1.72.0 2016–17 1.72.0 2017–18 1.72.0 2018–19 1.72.0 2019–20 1.72.0

PhDMEng (PT)(FT) 7.01.3 4.7 1.3 5.31.7 1.0 5.3 1.31.0 5.7 2.01.0 6.3 2.31.0 5.3 3.01.0 5.0 3.01.0 5.8 1.0 6.0 1.02.3 MAScMEng (Ext FT) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.01.7 2.0 1.7 2.0 1.7 2.0 1.7 2.0 1.7 2.0 1.7

MEngMEng (FT) (PT) 1.3 1.3 1.01.7 1.0 1.3 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.3 1.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 1.02.3 Figure 2.7c Institute of Biomaterials & Biomedical Engineering MEng (Ext FT) Footnote: For counting purposes, the academic1.7 year is from 1.7 May to 1.7 April. 1.7 1.7 1.7 Time to Completion for Graduate Students, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 FigureMEng (PT) 2.7c Time to Completion for Graduate1.7 Students 1.3 – Institute 2.0 of Biomedical 2.3 3.0Engineering, 3.0 2.3 Figure 2.7c2010–2011Institute to 2019–2020 of Biomaterials & Biomedical Engineering Time2010–11 to Completion 2011–12 2012–13 for Graduate 2013–14 Students, 2014–15 2010–2011 2015–16 2016–17 to 2019–2020 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20 PhD 6.0 5.7 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.7 5.2 5.3 5.5 6.0 Figure 2.7c Institute of Biomaterials & Biomedical Engineering 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20 MASc Time to2.0 Completion 2.0 for 2.0 Graduate 2.0 Students, 2.3 2010–2011 2.0 to 2.0 2019–2020 2.3 2.0 2.0 MEngPhD (FT) 6.0 5.7 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.7 5.2 5.31.0 5.51.0 6.01.0

MAScMEng (PT) 2010–112.0 2011–12 2.0 2012–13 2.0 2013–14 2.0 2014–15 2.3 2015–16 2.0 2016–17 2.0 2017–18 2.3 2018–191.3 2.0 2019–20 1.72.0

PhDMEngMHSc (FT) 6.02.0 5.7 2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 6.0 2.0 5.7 2.0 5.2 2.0 5.3 2.01.0 5.5 2.01.0 6.0 2.01.0 MAScMEng (PT) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.3 2.0 2.0 2.3 2.01.3 2.0 1.7

MEngMHSc (FT) (FT) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.01.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 Figure 2.7d Department of Chemical Engineering & Applied Chemistry MEng (PT) 1.3 1.7 Time to Completion for Graduate Students, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 MHSc (FT) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Figure 2.7d Department of Chemical Engineering & Applied Chemistry Time2010–11 to Completion 2011–12 2012–13 for Graduate 2013–14 Students, 2014–15 2010–2011 2015–16 2016–17 to 2019–2020 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20 FigurePhD 2.7d Time to Completion6.0 for 5.3 Graduate 5.2 Students 5.5 – Department 5.7 of 5.7 Chemical 5.5 Engineering 5.8 & Applied 5.5 6.3 Figure 2.7d Department of Chemical Engineering & Applied Chemistry Chemistry,2010–11 2010–2011 2011–12 to 2019–2020 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20 MASc Time to2.0 Completion 2.0 for 2.0 Graduate 2.0 Students, 2.0 2010–2011 2.3 to 2.0 2019–2020 2.0 2.0 2.0 MEngPhD (FT) 1.06.0 1.05.3 1.05.2 1.05.5 1.05.7 1.05.7 1.05.5 1.05.8 1.05.5 1.06.3

MEngMASc (Ext FT) 2010–112.0 2011–12 2.0 2012–13 2.0 2013–14 2.0 2014–151.5 2.0 2015–16 1.72.3 2016–17 1.72.0 2017–18 1.72.0 2018–19 1.72.0 2019–20 1.82.0

PhDMEng (PT)(FT) 6.01.81.0 5.3 1.31.0 5.2 2.01.0 5.5 2.01.0 5.7 1.81.0 5.7 1.51.0 5.5 2.01.0 5.8 1.71.0 5.5 1.71.0 6.3 1.0 MAScMEng (Ext FT) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.01.5 2.3 1.7 2.0 1.7 2.0 1.7 2.0 1.7 2.0 1.8

MEngMEng (FT) (PT) 1.01.8 1.0 1.3 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.8 1.0 1.5 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.7 1.0 1.7 1.0

MEng (Ext FT) 1.5 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8

MEng (PT) 1.8 1.3 2.0 2.0 1.8 1.5 2.0 1.7 1.7

Graduate Studies 27 Figure 2.7e Time to Completion for Graduate Students – Department of Civil & Mineral Engineering, Figure 2.7e2010–2011Department to 2019–2020 of Civil & Mineral Engineering Time to Completion for Graduate Students, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 Figure 2.7e Department of Civil & Mineral Engineering

Figure 2.7e DepartmentTime2010–11 to Completion 2011–12 of Civil 2012–13 &for Mineral Graduate 2013–14 Engineering Students, 2014–15 2010–2011 2015–16 2016–17 to 2019–2020 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20 PhDFigure 2.7e DepartmentTime to5.3 Completion of 5.3 Civil &for Mineral 5.3 Graduate Engineering 5.0 Students, 5.3 2010–2011 5.3 to 5.7 2019–2020 5.0 5.2 4.3 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20 MASc Time to2.0 Completion 2.0 for 2.0 Graduate 2.0 Students, 2.0 2010–2011 2.0 to 2.0 2019–2020 2.0 2.0 2.0 PhD 2010–115.3 2011–12 5.3 2012–13 5.3 2013–14 5.0 2014–15 5.3 2015–16 5.3 2016–17 5.7 2017–18 5.0 2018–19 5.2 2019–20 4.3 MEng (FT) 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 MAScPhD 2010–112.05.3 2011–12 2.05.3 2012–13 2.05.3 2013–14 2.05.0 2014–15 2.05.3 2015–16 2.05.3 2016–17 2.05.7 2017–18 2.05.0 2018–19 2.05.2 2019–20 2.04.3 MEng (Ext FT) 1.3 1.7 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 MEngMAScPhD (FT) 5.31.32.0 5.31.02.0 5.31.02.0 5.01.02.0 5.31.02.0 5.31.02.0 5.71.02.0 5.01.02.0 5.21.02.0 4.31.02.0 MEng (PT) 2.3 1.8 2.0 2.0 1.7 2.0 2.2 2.0 1.7 2.3 MAScMEng (Ext(FT) FT) 2.01.3 2.01.0 2.01.0 2.01.0 2.01.31.0 1.72.01.0 2.01.31.0 2.01.31.0 1.32.01.0 2.01.31.0 MEngCEM (FT) 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 MEng (PT)(FT)(Ext FT) 1.32.3 1.01.8 1.02.0 1.02.0 1.01.71.3 1.71.02.0 1.02.21.3 1.02.01.3 1.31.01.7 1.02.31.3 MEngCEM (Ext FT) 1.3 1.5 1.7 MEngMEngCEM (PT)(Ext FT)(FT) 2.3 1.8 2.0 2.01.3 1.7 1.71.32.0 1.32.2 1.32.0 1.31.7 1.32.3

MEngMEngCEM (PT) (Ext(FT) FT) 2.3 1.8 2.0 2.0 1.71.3 1.32.0 2.21.3 2.01.3 1.31.71.5 2.31.31.7 MEngCEMFigure 2.7f (Ext(FT) FT) The Edward S. Rogers Sr. Department of1.3 Electrical 1.3 & Computer 1.3 Engineering 1.3 1.31.5 1.31.7 Figure 2.7f Time to Completion for Graduate Students – The Edward S. Rogers Sr. Department of MEngCEM (Ext FT) Time to Completion for Graduate Students, 2010–2011 to 2019–20201.3 1.5 1.7 Figure 2.7fElectricalThe &Edward Computer S. RogersEngineering, Sr. Department 2010–2011 to of 2019–2020 Electrical & Computer Engineering Figure 2.7f TheTime2010–11 Edward to Completion 2011–12 S. Rogers 2012–13 for Sr. Graduate Department 2013–14 Students, 2014–15 of Electrical 2010–2011 2015–16 & 2016–17 Computer to 2019–2020 2017–18 Engineering 2018–19 2019–20 PhDFigure 2.7f TheTime Edward to5.0 Completion S. 5.2 Rogers for 5.5Sr. Graduate Department 5.3 Students, of 5.0 Electrical 2010–2011 5.0 & Computer to 5.3 2019–2020 Engineering 5.0 5.3 5.0 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20 MASc Time to2.0 Completion 2.0 for 2.0 Graduate 2.0 Students, 2.3 2010–2011 2.0 to 2.0 2019–2020 2.3 2.3 2.0 PhD 2010–115.0 2011–12 5.2 2012–13 5.5 2013–14 5.3 2014–15 5.0 2015–16 5.0 2016–17 5.3 2017–18 5.0 2018–19 5.3 2019–20 5.0 MEng (FT) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 MAScPhD 2010–112.05.0 2011–12 2.05.2 2012–13 2.05.5 2013–14 2.05.3 2014–15 2.35.0 2015–16 2.05.0 2016–17 2.05.3 2017–18 2.35.0 2018–19 2.35.3 2019–20 2.05.0 MEng (Ext FT) 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.7 1.3 1.3 MEngMAScPhD (FT) 5.01.02.0 5.21.02.0 5.51.02.0 5.31.02.0 5.01.02.3 5.01.02.0 5.31.02.0 5.01.02.3 5.31.02.3 5.01.02.0 MEng (PT) 2.7 2.0 2.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.3 2.7 2.3 2.3 MAScMEng (Ext(FT) FT) 2.01.0 2.01.0 2.01.0 2.01.0 2.31.31.0 1.32.01.0 2.01.31.0 2.31.71.0 1.32.31.0 2.01.31.0

MEng (PT)(FT)(Ext FT) 1.02.7 1.02.0 1.02.2 1.02.0 1.02.01.3 1.31.02.0 1.02.31.3 1.02.71.7 1.31.02.3 1.02.31.3 MEngFigure (PT)(Ext 2.7g FT) Department2.7 of 2.0 Mechanical 2.2 & Industrial 2.0 Engineering1.3 2.0 1.32.0 1.32.3 1.72.7 1.32.3 1.32.3 MEng (PT) Time to2.7 Completion 2.0 for 2.2 Graduate 2.0 Students, 2.0 2010–2011 2.0 to 2.3 2019–2020 2.7 2.3 2.3 FigureFigure 2.7g 2.7g Time toDepartment Completion offor Mechanical Graduate Students & Industrial – Department Engineering of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, Figure 2.7g2010–2011DepartmentTime2010–11 to 2019–2020Completion 2011–12 of Mechanical 2012–13 for Graduate 2013–14& Industrial Students, 2014–15 Engineering 2010–2011 2015–16 2016–17 to 2019–2020 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20 PhDFigure 2.7g DepartmentTime to4.7 Completion of 5.0 Mechanical for 5.7 Graduate & Industrial 5.0 Students, Engineering 4.8 2010–2011 5.0 to 4.7 2019–2020 5.0 4.7 4.3 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20 MASc Time to2.0 Completion 2.0 for 2.0 Graduate 2.0 Students, 2.0 2010–2011 2.0 to 2.0 2019–2020 2.0 2.0 2.0 PhD 2010–114.7 2011–12 5.0 2012–13 5.7 2013–14 5.0 2014–15 4.8 2015–16 5.0 2016–17 4.7 2017–18 5.0 2018–19 4.7 2019–20 4.3 MEng (FT) 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 MAScPhD 2010–112.04.7 2011–12 2.05.0 2012–13 2.05.7 2013–14 2.05.0 2014–15 2.04.8 2015–16 2.05.0 2016–17 2.04.7 2017–18 2.05.0 2018–19 2.04.7 2019–20 2.04.3 MEng (Ext FT) 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 MEngMAScPhD (FT) 4.71.02.0 5.01.32.0 5.71.02.0 5.01.02.0 4.81.02.0 5.01.02.0 4.71.02.0 5.01.02.0 4.71.02.0 4.31.02.0 MEng (PT) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.7 2.3 2.0 1.7 1.7 MAScMEng (Ext(FT) FT) 2.01.0 2.01.3 2.01.0 2.01.0 2.01.71.0 1.72.01.0 2.01.71.0 2.01.71.0 1.72.01.0 2.01.71.0 MEngDM (PT) 2.3 2.7 2.5 2.7 2.3 3.5 2.8 3.0 MEng (PT)(FT)(Ext FT) 1.02.0 1.32.0 1.02.0 1.02.0 1.02.01.7 1.71.0 1.02.31.7 1.02.01.7 1.71.0 1.01.7

MEngMEngDM (PT)(Ext (PT) FT) 2.32.0 2.72.0 2.52.0 2.72.01.7 2.32.0 1.73.5 1.72.82.3 1.73.02.0 1.7 1.7 MEngMEngDMFigure (PT) 2.7h (PT) Department2.02.3 of 2.02.7 Materials 2.02.5 Science 2.02.7 & Engineering 2.02.3 1.73.5 2.32.8 2.03.0 1.7 1.7 MEngDM (PT) Time to2.3 Completion 2.7 for 2.5 Graduate 2.7 Students, 2.3 2010–2011 3.5 to 2.8 2019–2020 3.0 Figure 2.7h Department of Materials Science & Engineering Figure 2.7h DepartmentTime to Completion of Materials for Graduate Science &Students, Engineering 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 Figure 2.7h Time to 2010–11Completion 2011–12 for Graduate 2012–13 Students 2013–14 – Department 2014–15 2015–16 of Materials 2016–17 Science 2017–18 & Engineering, 2018–19 2019–20 PhDFigure 2.7h DepartmentTime to6.0 Completion of 6.3 Materials for 5.7 Graduate Science 4.7 &Students, Engineering 5.3 2010–2011 5.5 to 5.8 2019–2020 5.3 5.3 7.0 2010–20112010–11 to 2019–2020 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20 MASc Time to2.0 Completion 2.0 for 2.0 Graduate 2.3 Students, 2.0 2010–2011 2.0 to 2.0 2019–2020 2.0 2.0 2.3 PhD 2010–116.0 2011–12 6.3 2012–13 5.7 2013–14 4.7 2014–15 5.3 2015–16 5.5 2016–17 5.8 2017–18 5.3 2018–19 5.3 2019–20 7.0 MEng (FT) 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 MAScPhD 2010–112.06.0 2011–12 2.06.3 2012–13 2.05.7 2013–14 2.34.7 2014–15 2.05.3 2015–16 2.05.5 2016–17 2.05.8 2017–18 2.05.3 2018–19 2.05.3 2019–20 2.37.0 MEng (Ext FT) 1.3 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 MEngMAScPhD (FT) 6.02.0 6.32.00.8 5.72.01.0 4.72.31.0 5.32.01.0 5.52.01.0 5.82.01.0 5.32.01.0 5.32.01.0 7.02.31.0 MEng (PT) 2.3 2.3 2.0 2.7 2.8 2.0 MEngMASc (Ext(FT) FT) 2.0 2.00.8 2.01.0 2.31.0 2.01.31.0 1.72.01.0 2.01.71.0 2.01.71.0 1.72.01.0 2.31.71.0

MEng (PT)(Ext(FT) FT) 2.3 2.30.8 2.01.0 2.71.0 2.81.31.0 1.71.0 1.71.0 1.71.02.0 1.71.0 1.71.0

MEng (Ext(PT) FT) 2.3 2.3 2.0 2.71.3 2.8 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.72.0 1.7

MEng (PT) 2.3 2.3 2.0 2.7 2.8 2.0

28 Graduate Studies Figure 2.8 Graduate Degrees Awarded by Degree Type, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

925 881 880 858 825 133 150 165 167 722 145 665 143 590 295 110 200 226 229 238 502 519 107 109 236 107 234 212 190 215 508 490 484 497 442 PhD 321 343 271 MASc 205 195 MEng & MHSc 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20

Figure 2.8 Graduate Degrees Awarded by Degree Type, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 Figure 2.9 ELITE Emphases Awarded, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

Chapter:2010–11Ch.2 2011–12 - Graduate 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20 UTIASExcel Filename:22.8+3.7 - Grad Degrees7241 Awarded by Dept+Gender -111 10-11 to 19-20 (AR20735 2.8+3.7) - v1f.xlsx Sheet: 2.8 BME Date: June 19, 2020 1 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert ChemE 12 11 17 8 20 20 18 13 15 6

CivMin 13 11 9 12 12 24 22 16 21 11

ECE 3 3 22 32 22 14 28 30 15 15

MIE 19 20 26 36 39 50 53 41 48 29 PhD MSE MASc 114611515175 MEng & MHSc Total 50 46 85 96 108 124 137 118 109 72

Figure 2.9 ELITE Certificates Awarded, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

Chapter: Ch.2 - Graduate Excel Filename: 2.9 - ELITE Certificates Awarded - 1011-1920 (AR20 2.9) - v1.xlsx Sheet: 2.9 Date: July 6, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

Graduate Studies 29 Figure 2.10 New MEng Emphases

Title Description Through this emphasis, students in ChemE, MIE and MSE can specialize in topics MEng Emphasis in Biomanufacturing such as biofuels and biochemical production, microbes for bioremediation, and applications in biomaterials, therapeutics, drug delivery and medicine. This emphasis, open to students in ChemE, MIE and MSE, focuses on MEng Emphasis in Advanced polymers, composites, colloids and suspensions. Students will study their Soft Materials underlying chemical and physical properties and learn design principles for the engineering of soft materials for practical applications.

Figure 2.11 New Graduate Courses Launched, 2019–2020

Course Code Course Title AER1515 Perception for Robotics AER1516 Robot Motion Planning AER1517 Control for Robotics APS1053 Time Series Analytics for A.I. in Finance APS1101 System Dynamic Risk Assessment APS2000 Summer Engineering Practicum APS5500 Research Methods and Project Execution for Graduate Student Success BME1478 Coding for Biomedical Engineers CHE1133 Bioprocess Engineering CHE1135 Regulatory Affairs for Industrial and Biopharmaceutical Products CHE1333 Biomaterials Engineering for Nanomedicine CHE1334 Organ-on-a-Chip Engineering CIV1240 Building Performance Assessment MIE1075 AI Applications in Robotics MIE1076 AI Applications in Robotics II MIE1080 Introduction to Healthcare Robotics MIE1453 Introduction to Sensors and Sensor Network MIE1612 Stochastic Programming and Robust Optimization MIE1724 Additive Manufacturing in Engineering Applications MIE1766 Aluminum Die Casting 2 – Product Design and Optimization MIE1767 Mechatronics in Automotive Applications 1 MIE1768 Mechatronics in Automotive Applications 2 MSE1063 Application of Artificial Intelligence in Process Metallurgy MSE1064 Extraction, Production and Processing of Aluminum MSE1065 Application of Artificial Intelligence in Materials Design MSE1066 Practical Aspects of Electron Microscopy MSE1067 Damage and Failure of Advanced Engineering Materials MSE1068 Additive Manufacturing of Metals, Ceramics and Composites

30 Graduate Studies In February 2020, U of T CHAPTER 3 Engineering hosted NSBEHacks 2020, the only student-run Black hackathon in the GTA. The winning team, Clarity, was COMMUNITY recognized for its achievement in building a product to help people with autism learn to understand emotions through tone. PHOTO: NSBE U OF T STUDENT CHAPTER

FACTS & FIGURES 35.0% 32.9% 95+ Percentage of all students who Percentage of all students Undergraduate and graduate are women, including 37.9% who come from outside of student clubs and teams, from 3,000+ of undergraduate students and Canada, including 28.1% of the Skule™ Orchestra to the 29.1% of graduate students. undergraduate students and Human Powered Vehicles Students reached through 42.4% of graduate students. Development Team. pre-university outreach programming in 2019–2020. Figure 3.1 Continent of Origin: Undergraduate Students, Fall 2019

South and North America Central America Africa Europe Middle East Asia 60.5% 1.0% 1.0% 1.2% 3.7% 32.4%

Data in this chapter are presented by academic year (September to August) unless otherwise noted. Note 3.1: Not shown — 0.1% of undergraduate students from Oceania, which includes Australia, New Zealand and other countries in the Pacific Ocean. Country of origin is derived from a combination of citizenship, location of previous studies (e.g. elementary school, high school and university) and permanent address. This information does not indicate current Canadian immigration status, which is used to determine domestic/ status for tuition and funding purposes.

32 Community Figure 3.2a Incoming First-Year Undergraduates with Percentage of Women, 2010 to 2019

42.3% 40.1% 40.5% 39.8%

30.6% 31.4% 25.4% 25.5% 23.2% 23.2%

1,265 1,203 1,180 1,192 1,205 1,202 1,106 321 1,065 1,062 13 279 365 378 1,005 274 1 8 508 282 431 423 403 924 906 944 824 827 827 681 602 633 631

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Men Women Gender Not Reported or Another Gender

Figure 3.2b Incoming First-Year Undergraduates with Percentage of International Students, 2010 to 2019

Figure 3.2a 31.9% 31.7% 30.0% Incoming First-Year29.3% Undergraduates with Percentage of Women, 25.8% 27.0% 26.0% 26.6% 24.2% 22.6% 2010 to 2019

Chapter: Ch.1 - Undergraduate 3.2a+b - UG Yr1 - Incoming - Gender 10-19 (AR20 3.2) - v3fc.xlsx Excel Filename:1,265 1,203 1,180 Sheet: 3.2a 1,192 1,205 1,202 327 1,106 272 Date: July 13, 2020 362 1,065 1,062 381 286 380 1,005 Prepared by: Geoff324 Wichert 277 282 271 931 938 894 843 821 782 812 788 780 734

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Domestic International

Note 3.2a: Student counts are shown as of November 1. Data on student gender comes from the U of T Enrolment Reporting Cube; the options to report “another gender” or to not report gender were added in 2017. Note 3.2b: Student counts are shown as of November 1. Domestic students are defined as citizens or permanent residents of Canada. Figure 3.2b Incoming First-Year Undergraduates with Percentage of International Students, 2010 to 2019 Community 33

Chapter: Ch.1 - Undergraduate Excel Filename: 3.2a+b - UG Yr1 - Incoming - Gender 10-19 (AR20 3.2) - v3fc.xlsx Sheet: 3.2b Date: July 13, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert Figure 3.2c Incoming First-Year Domestic and International Undergraduates, 2010 to 2019

2010 719 (59.8%) 140 72 272 1,203

2011 634 (53.7%) 168 92 286 1,180

2012 685 (54.2%) 161 92 327 1,265

2013 558 (50.5%) 147 77 324 1,106

2014 628 (52.7%) 138 46 380 1,192 International 2015 658 (54.6%) 147 38 362 1,205 Domestic: Abroad 2016 538 (53.5%) 158 38 271 1,005 Domestic: Out of Province 2017 602 (56.5%) 116 70 277 1,065 Domestic: Ontario 2018 593 (55.8%) 140 47 282 1,062

2019 662 (55.1%) 90 69 381 1,202

Figure 3.3a Undergraduate Enrolment with Percentage of Women, 2010 to 2019 Figure 1.4 Incoming First-Year Domestic and International Undergraduates, 2010 to 2019 37.9% 35.4% Chapter: Ch.1 - Undergraduate 33.0% Excel Filename: 1.4 - UG Yr1 Demog - Origin, M-F, Dom-Intl30.0% - 10-19 (AR20 3.2c) - v1f.xlsx Sheet: 1.4 27.4% 25.8% 23.8%Date: May24.8% 21, 2020 22.6% 23.4% Prepared by: Geoff Wichert 5,489 5,565 5,441 5,311 5,298 5,280 5,090 5,241 5,235 4,936 7 25 1,417 1,527 1,634 12 1,317 1,749 2,003 1,189 1,249 1,855 1,118

3,992 3,994 4,072 4,038 3,818 3,901 3,807 3,542 3,368 3,252

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Men Women Gender Not Reported or Another Gender

Note 3.2c: Includes full- and part-time students and those working full time through the Professional Experience Year Co-op Program (PEY Co-op). Does not count students with special (non-degree) status. Student counts shown as of November 1. Domestic students are defined as citizensFigure or permanent 3.3a residents of Canada. Note 3.3a, b: IncludesUndergraduates full- and part-time students with and Percen those workingtage fullof timeWomen, through 2010the Professional to 2019 Experience Year Co-op Program (PEY Co-op). Does not count students with special (non-degree) status. Student counts shown as of November 1. Data on student gender comes from the U of T Enrolment Reporting Cube; the options to report “another gender” or to not report gender were added in 2017.

Chapter: Ch.1 - Undergraduate Excel Filename: 3.3a+b - UG Total - M-F, Dom-Intl 10-19 (AR20 3.3) - v2fc.xlsx 34 Community Sheet: 3.3a Date: July 13, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert Figure 3.3b Percentage of Women by Undergraduate Program, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

50%

TrackOne 40% ChemE CivE 30% MinE CompE ElecE 20% EngSci MechE 10% IndE MSE Overall 0% 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20

Figure 3.3c Undergraduates with Percentage of International Students, 2010 to 2019 Figure 1.5b Percentage of Women by Undergraduate Program 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 27.4% 28.0% 28.6% 27.5% 28.1% 25.8% 23.1% 21.2% 19.1% Chapter: Ch.1 - Undergraduate 16.3% Excel Filename: 1.5b - UG Headcount - M-F by Dept - 10-19 (AR20 1.5b) - v1fc.xlsx Sheet: 1.5b 5,489 5,565 5,441 5,241 Date:5,311April 9, 2020 5,298 5,235 5,280 4,936 5,090 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert1,416 1,524 1,522 1,110 1,228 1,516 1,439 1,484 805 973

4,131 4,117 4,131 4,083 4,073 4,041 3,919 3,782 3,796 3,796

Chart Labels: TrackOne

2010ChemE 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 CivE MinE Domestic International CompE ElecE EngSci Note 3.3c: Includes full- and part-time students and those working full time through the Professional Experience Year Co-op Program (PEY Co-op). DoesMechE not count students with special (non-degree) status. Student counts shown as of November 1. Domestic students are defined as citizensIndE orFigure permanent 3.3c residents of Canada. MSEUndergraduates with Percentage of International Students, 2010 Overallto 2019 Community 35 Chapter: Ch.1 - Undergraduate Excel Filename: 3.3a+c - UG Total - M-F, Dom-Intl 10-19 (AR20 3.3) - v2fc.xlsx Sheet: 3.3c Date: July 13, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert Figure 3.4 Undergraduate Degrees Awarded by Gender, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

1,123 1,100 1,080 1,050 1,052 1,020 961 966 937 277 899 327 230 281 293 345 227 209 172 235

846 757 790 769 759 773 727 734 702 735

Women Men

2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20

Figure 3.5 Continent of Origin: Graduate Students, Fall 2019

Figure 3.4 Undergraduate Degrees Awarded by Gender, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

Chapter: Ch.3 - Community Excel Filename: 1.9+3.4 - UG Degrees Awarded by Dept+Gender - 10-11 to 19-20 (AR20 1.9a+b) - v1f.xlsx Sheet: 3.4 Date: June 19, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

South and North America Central America Africa Europe Middle East Asia 44.0% 1.4% 1.6% 2.2% 10.9% 39.6%

Figure 3.4: Data reported by academic year (September to August). Data on student gender comes from the U of T Enrolment Reporting Cube; the options to report “another gender” or to not report gender were added in 2017. Note 3.5: Not shown — 0.1% of undergraduate students from Oceania, which includes Australia, New Zealand and other countries in the Pacific Ocean. Country of origin is derived from a combination of citizenship, location of previous studies (e.g. elementary school, high school and university) and permanent address. This information does not indicate current Canadian immigration status, which is used to determine domestic/international student status for tuition and funding purposes.

36 Community Figure 3.6a Graduate Students by Degree Type and Gender with Percentage of Women Students, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

29.1% Percentage of 27.5% Women 27.1% 27.1% Students 26.7% 26.2% 25.9% 26.1% 25.0% 2,636 24.3% 2,498 2,365 2,415 303 2,259 2,194 260 230 246 2,064 176 231 1,933 MEng & MHSc 1,842 154 687 651 Women 134 650 653 1,669 113 535 582 449 MEng & MHSc 95 408 415 177 187 Men 311 162 171 142 157 190 156 155 448 MASc 143 498 Women 434 421 451 479 431 460 423 423 276 MASc 238 239 231 239 Men 215 218 227 167 191 PhD Women 642 646 670 732 528 542 587 620 638 619 PhD Men 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20

2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20 MEng & MHSc Women 95 113 134 154 176 231 230 246 260 303 MEng & MHSc Men 311 415 408 449 535 582 650 653 651 687 MEng & MHSc 12112 1 Gender Not Reported MASc Women 143 155 156 162 171 142 157 190 177 187 MASc Men 423 423 431 460 434 421 451 479 498 448 MASc 22 1 11 Gender Not Reported PhD Women 167 191 215 218 238 239 231 227 239 276 PhD Men 528 542 587 620 638 642 646 619 670 732 PhD 22 Gender Not Reported

Figure 3.6a Graduate Students by Degree Type and Gender with Percentage of Women, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

Chapter: Ch.2 - Graduate Studies Excel Filename: 3.6a+b - Grad Headcount by Degree 10-19 (AR20 3.6a+b) - v3fc.xlsx Sheet: 3.6a Date: July 16, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

Note 3.6a: Student counts are shown as of November 1. Data on gender comes from the School of Graduate Studies’ Student Enrol- ment Cube, where gender is an optional category. Students who opted not to report their gender appear in the data table, but are not visible in the graph presented above.

Community 37 Figure 3.6b Graduate Students by Degree Type and Domestic/International Status with Percentage of International Students, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

42.4% Percentage of 36.5% International 33.7% 32.4% Students 31.1% 27.1% 24.6% 22.4% 2,636 2,498 19.3% 2,415 16.7% 2,365 2,259 529 2,194 422 367 2,064 382 1,933 192 299 1,842 114 MEng & MHSc 88 462 International 1,669 56 532 489 490 520 516 498 32 456 MEng & MHSc 473 167 172 374 138 Domestic 138 124 116 125 131 463 119 532 509 88 484 482 447 483 MASc 456 International 480 461 MASc 417 Domestic 214 256 278 287 289 278 322 158 180 PhD 588 582 598 594 588 589 593 537 553 568 International

PhD Domestic 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20

Figure 3.7 FigureGraduate 3.6b Degrees Awarded by Gender, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 International and Domestic Graduate Students by Degree Type with

Percentage of International Students, 925 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 881 880 858 825 266 Chapter: Ch.2 - Graduate722 Studies 221 253 260 Filename: 3.6a+b665 - Grad Headcount220 by Degree 10-19 (AR20 3.6a+b) - v3fc.xlsx Sheet: 3.6b 590 186 July 16, 2020 Date: 173 502 519 151 113 134

Legend: 660 659 605 598 627 7 Percentage of International Students536 492 6 MEng406 & MHSc439 International 368 5 MEng & MHSc Domestic 4 MASc International Women 3 MASc Domestic Men 2 PhD International 2010–111 PhD 2011–12 Domestic 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20

Note 3.8 (opposite page): This list includes 99 undergraduate and graduate student clubs and teams that shared $375,375 in funding through the Centralized Process for Student Initiative Funding (CPSIF). Beyond these, there are many other Engineering Society-affili- ated groups — such as the Blue Sky Solar Team or aUToronto — which are not funded through CPSIF. Our students also participate in hundreds more clubsFigure and teams 3.7 across U of T. Undergraduate Degrees Awarded by Gender, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

38 Community Chapter: Ch.3 - Community Excel Filename: 2.8+3.7 - Grad Degrees Awarded by Dept+Gender - 10-11 to 19-20 (AR20 2.8+3.7) - v1f.xlsx Sheet: 3.7 Date: June 19, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert Figure 3.8 Engineering Undergraduate and Graduate Clubs and Teams

Arts – University of Toronto Concrete – Civil Engineering Graduate Student Toboggan Team Association – Fly with Origami, Learn to Dream – University of Toronto Data Science – Club for Undergraduate Biomedical – Skule™ Arts Festival Team Engineering – Skule™ Choir – University of Toronto Engineering – Developer Student Club – Skule™ Dance Club Kompetitions – Engineering Science Club – Skule™ Orchestra – University of Toronto Formula – Galbraith Society – Skule™ Stage Band Electric – Global Engineering Club – University of Toronto Formula – Human Factors Interest Group Athletics Racing Team – IEEE University of Toronto Student – University of Toronto Hyperloop Branch – Skule™ Badminton Club Team – Institute for Leadership Education – Skule™ Ski Club – University of Toronto Robotics in Engineering, Graduate – U of T Engineering Iron Dragons Association – Institute for Industrial and Systems – UTSG Cricket Club – University of Toronto Seismic Engineers – University of Toronto Table Tennis Design Team Materials Industry Club Club – – University of Toronto Supermileage – Materials Science and Engineering Team (formerly Carbon Cutting Graduate Student Association Societal/Community/Charity Racers) – Mechanical Engineering Club – Engineers in Action – UT BIOME – MechEngage – Engineers Without Borders – Mineral Engineering Club World – Let’s Talk Science Hobby & Special Interest Mining Competition – Project Include – Materials Science and Engineering – SkuleCraft – Muslim Students’ Association Student Discipline Club – Skule™ Strategy Games Club – QueerSphere (U of T Engiqueers) – National Society of Black – Skule™ Smash Club – Skule™ Alumni Outreach Engineers – University of Toronto Emergency – Toronto Science Policy Network – NSight Mentorship Program First Responders – SettleIn Cultural – University of Toronto Engineering – Society of Petroleum Engineers Finance Association U of T Chapter – Association of Chinese Engineers – University of Toronto Sports – STEAM – Bangladeshi Students’ Association Analytics Club – Suits U – Indian Students’ Society – University of Toronto Sky – Sustainable Engineers Association – Korean Engineering Students’ Association – TechXplore Association – Toronto Students Advancing Professional Development & Aerospace Design & Competition – University of Toronto Business Industry Association – Design Team Association – Association of Leadership in – University of Toronto Design – Future-Living Lab Chemical Engineering League – Human Powered Vehicle Design – Bioengineering Student – University of Toronto Earthquake Team Association Engineering Research Institute – International Genetically – Biomedical Engineering Student Student Chapter Engineered Machines Toronto Association – University of Toronto Engineering – Interplanetary Space Exploration – Canadian Association of Food Toastmasters Team Engineers – University of Toronto Institute of – Operations Research Challenge – Canadian International Erosion Transportation Engineers Student – Robotics for Space Exploration Control Association Chapter – Spark Design Club – Canadian Society for Chemical – University of Toronto Machine – Troitsky Bridge Building Club Engineering Intelligence Student Team – University of Toronto - Destination – Canadian Society for Civil – University of Toronto Ontario Imagination Engineering Water Works Association Student – University of Toronto Aerospace – Canadian Electrical Contractor’s Chapter Team Association U of T Student Chapter – Water Environment Association of – University of Toronto Chemical – Chemical Engineering Council Ontario U of T Student Chapter Vehicles – Chemical Engineering Graduate – Women in Science and Engineering University of Toronto Concrete – Students’ Association Canoe Team – Civil Engineering Council

Community 39 Figure 3.9 Pre-University Outreach Programs, 2019–2020

Another Gender or Gender Not Total # of Program Date Audience Female Male Reported Participants SUMMER DEEP Spring Seminar Series June 16 - June 29 Grades 9-12 16 11 101 128 ENGLife July 2 - July 26 Grades 10-11 0 0 21 21 LAUNCH Science and July 3 - Grades 2-8 42 24 361 427 Engineering Program DEEP Summer Academy July 8 - August 2 Grades 9-12 63 111 801 975 Girls' Jr. DEEP July 8 - July 12 Grades 3-8 55 0 0 55 ENGage July 8 - July 12 Grades 3-8 25 27 0 52 Jr. DEEP July 15 - August 16 Grades 3-8 223 450 0 673 Jr. DEEP Coding July 15 - August 16 Grades 3-8 61 95 0 156 Jr. DEEP Makerspace July 29 - August 16 Grades 5 & 6 16 32 0 48 University of Toronto Engineering August 5 - August 16 Grades 9-12 13 17 66 96 Academy (UTEA) Destination STEM! August 20 - August 23 Grades 5-8 19 40 0 59 FALL Go ENG Girl October 26 Grades 7-10 46 0 0 46 Girls' Jr. DEEP Saturdays (Fall) October 19 - November 9 Grades 3-8 43 0 0 43 Girls’ Jr. DEEP Coding Saturday (Fall) October 19 - November 9 Grades 5-8 20 0 0 20 Jr. DEEP Saturdays (Fall) November 16 - November 30 Grades 3-8 25 47 0 72 Jr. DEEP Coding Saturday (Fall) November 16 - November 30 Grades 5-8 10 30 0 40 Engineering High School October 19 - November 30 Grades 9-12 19 21 89 129 Saturdays (Fall) WINTER Girls' Jr. DEEP Saturdays (Winter) January 18 - February 8 Grades 3-8 47 0 0 47 Engineering High School January 18 - March 7 Grades 9-12 10 8 67 85 Saturdays (Winter) ENGage High School Saturdays January 18 - March 22 Grades 9-12 2 2 12 16 Jr. DEEP Saturdays (Winter) February 22 - March 7 Grades 3-8 25 44 0 69 Total 755 915 1,518 3,188

Note 3.9: Data cover the period between June 2019 and early March 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic forced the cancellation of all spring programs (e.g. in-school workshops, March Break camps, etc.) and is the reason behind the lower numbers of students reached for 2019-2020 as compared with 2018–2019. Some summer programs such as Blueprint were continued online; they will be reported in the 2021 Annual Report.

40 Community Figure 3.10 Total Number of Faculty by Academic Area, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

272 261 260 266 245 243 245 249 20 20 234 238 18 19 18 15 16 15 17 17 17 14 13 16 12 12 12 13 32 10 11 29 30 31 UTIAS 31 31 30 31 30 31 BME 42 41 41 43 39 37 35 36 40 ChemE 38 CivMin 76 76 76 77 76 75 ECE 70 72 76 76 ECP & EngSci 9 9 9 9 6 6666 MIE 6 57 55 56 57 MSE 49 50 52 53 53 53

14 15 14 13 14 14 16 17 18 18 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20

UTIAS Assistant Profs 4 5 6 5 5 4 3 2 3 3 Associate Profs 3 3 4 4 4 6 6 8 6 6 Professors 7 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 9 9 Teaching-Stream Faculty 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 BME Assistant Profs 3 5 6 5 4 4 4 2 3 3 Associate Profs 3 3 2 2 3 4 4 6 7 6 Professors 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 5 Teaching-Stream Faculty 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 ChemE Assistant Profs 7 5 6 4 5 4 4 3 3 1 Associate Profs 2 3 3 5 5 5 2 4 4 5 Professors 18 18 18 18 17 17 20 20 21 23 Teaching-Stream Faculty 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 CivMin Assistant Profs 9 9 8 7 8 5 8 6 7 8 Associate Profs 11 10 11 11 9 14 12 12 9 11 Professors 17 19 17 16 18 20 21 22 24 23 Teaching-Stream Faculty 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ECE Assistant Profs 7 9 11 9 7 5 5 2 1 2 Associate Profs 25 25 22 20 16 16 15 13 12 11 Professors 34 34 39 43 49 50 51 56 58 60 Teaching-Stream Faculty 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 ECP & Teaching-Stream Faculty 6 6 6 6 6 6 9 9 9 9 EngSci MIE Assistant Profs 8 7 7 6 6 6 9 7 7 9 Associate Profs 15 16 14 16 15 12 11 12 10 8 Professors 24 24 28 28 29 32 33 33 36 37 Teaching-Stream Faculty 2 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 MSE Assistant Profs 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 3 2 Associate Profs 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 5 6 Professors 10 10 8 7 7 7 8 9 9 9 Teaching-Stream Faculty 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 Total 234 238 245 243 245 249 261 260 266 272

Figure 3.10 Total Academic Staff by Academic Area, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

Chapter: 3 - Community Excel Filename: 3.10 - Academic Staff by Dept - 1011-1920 (AR20 3.10) - v1f.xlsx Sheet: 3.10 Date: July 14, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

Community 41 Figure 3.11 Total Number of Faculty with Percentage of Women Overall and by Academic Rank, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

272 266 261 260 46.2% 249 245 243 245 238 234 40.7% 38.5%

34.8% 36.1% 33.3% 31.6% 32.1% 29.6% 27.9% 27.4% 24.5% 26.4% 26.3% 25.8% 21.7% 25.0% 22.4% 21.0% 20.6% 21.1% 21.4% 21.0% 18.0% 18.5% 21.5% 16.7% 16.9% 15.8% 15.5% 14.7% 15.0% 15.7% 12.5% 11.8% 10.0% 7.4% 57 57 5.3% 6.7% 55 56 44 46 37 41 41 37 4.4%

2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20

Total Faculty % Women Faculty % Women Assistant Professors

Women Faculty % Women Professors % Women Associate Professors

Figure 3.11 Total Number of Faculty with Percentage of Women Overall and by Academic Rank, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

Chapter: Ch 3 - Community Excel Filename: 3.11 - Total Faculty +% Women - 1011-1920 (AR20 3.11) - v1f.xlsx Sheet: 3.11 Date: July 14, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

42 Community Figure 3.12 Percentage of Women Faculty at U of T Engineering Compared with Women Faculty in Ontario and Canadian Engineering Faculties, 2018–2019

14.8%

Professors 12.7%

11.5%

25.1%

Associate Professors 17.9%

17.5%

40.0%

Assistant Professors 30.8%

26.1%

20.3%

Total, Tenure Stream 17.7%

15.9%

32.0%

Teaching Stream 21.9%

21.0%

21.4% U of T Engineering Grand Total 18.1% Ontario 16.8% Canada

Figure 3.12 Percentage of Women Faculty at U of T Engineering Compared with Women Faculty in Ontario and Canadian Engineering Faculties, 2018

Chapter: Ch 3 - Community Excel Filename: 3.12 - APSC Faculty - %Women cf w Ont+Can (AR20 3.12) - v2.xlsx Sheet: 3.12 Date: August 14, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert Community 43 Figure 3.13 Canada Research Chairs with Number and Percentage of Women Chairholders, 2011 to 2020

39% 39% 38% 38% 37% % of Women CRCs 30% 27% 38 22% 17% 32 32 14% 31 31

27 26 23 23 22

14 12 12 12 12

8 7 Total CRCs 5 3 4 Women CRCs

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Figure 3.14 Total Staff by Role and Gender, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

Figure 3.13 2010–11 Total145.6 Canada Research59.7 14.6 36.8 Chairs256.7 in Engineering with 2011–12 Number150.7 and Percentage65.7 22.9 of38.5 Women277.8 Chairholders, 2011 to 2020 2012–13 156.9 72.3 21.6 41.8 292.6

2013–14 157.0 79.8 22.9 40.3 300.0 Chapter: Ch.10 - Diversity 2014–15 Excel Filename:162.03.13 - CRCs by76.4 Date22.3 - Chart40.0 - w #+%300.7 of Women (AR20 3.13) - v3.xlsx Technical Staff - Men Sheet: 3.13 2015–16 168.3 89.5 14.3 39.8 311.9 Technical Staff - Women Date: July 15, 2020 2016–17 Prepared by: Geoff173.7 Wichert 93.5 16.7 42.6 326.5 Administrative Staff - Men Administrative Staff - Women 2010–11 145.6 59.7 14.6 36.8 256.7 2017–18 169.6 95.5 16.1 41.1 322.3

2011–12 150.7 65.7 22.9 38.5 277.8 2018–19 181.0 97.5 21.3 45.2 345.0

2012–13 156.9 72.3 21.6 41.8 292.6 2019–20 184.7 113.8 21.8 40.6 360.9

2013–14 157.0 79.8 22.9 40.3 300.0

2014–15 162.0 76.4 22.3 40.0 300.7 Technical Staff - Men 2015–16 168.3 89.5 14.3 39.8 311.9 TechnicalFigure Staff 3.14- Women 2016–17 173.7 93.5 16.7 42.6 326.5 AdministrativeTotal Staff Staff - Menby Type and Gender, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

2017–18 169.6 95.5 16.1 41.1 322.3 Administrative Staff - Women Chapter: Ch.3 - Community 2018–19 181.0 97.5 21.3 45.2 345.0 Excel Filename: 3.14 - Staff by Type+M-F - 10-19 (AR20 3.14) - v1.xlsx 2019–20 184.7 113.8 21.8 40.6 360.9 Sheet: 3.14 Date: June 17, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert 44 Community

Figure 3.14 Total Staff by Type and Gender, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

Chapter: Ch.3 - Community Excel Filename: 3.14 - Staff by Type+M-F - 10-19 (AR20 3.14) - v1.xlsx Sheet: 3.14 Date: June 17, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert Figure 3.15 Summary of Progress Against the Recommendations of the Blueprint for Action (2018), as prepared by the Eagles’ Longhouse (Engineering Indigenous Initiatives Steering Committee), 2020

Immediate Actions (2018) Recommendation Description Progress Role defined and job posting written. Create an Indigenous administrative position Recruitment begun through personal Faculty & Staff — 1 to begin the process of taking responsibility networks. Next steps: increased for the calls to action of the TRC. recruitment efforts and job posting. In 2018, 2019 and 2020, a U of T Engineering delegation went to the Canadian Indigenous Support a program focused on Science and Engineering Society annual Faculty & Staff — 2 the recruitment and hiring of gathering, meeting with current Indigenous Indigenous faculty and staff. community members with potential to become U of T Engineering undergraduate and graduate students, faculty and staff. Upcoming: A Blanket Exercise is a kinesthetic Offer Indigenous Cultural Awareness learning exercise designed to educate seminars to all employee groups. non-Indigenous people on the history of the Indigenous People of Canada including the ways education has been used as Faculty & Staff — 3 Note: This action strongly overlaps with another recommendation, a weapon against Indigenous people. Indigenous Student Access — 1. Arrangements for the two-day facilitated Progress items for both actions are training session are underway to be held when cross-referenced to each other. in-person interaction resumes on campus. Future facilitators are being recruited. A smudging ceremony was held in the Myhal Centre for Engineering Innovation Ensure the existence of plentiful Indigenous Spaces — 1 & Entrepreneurship lobby in 2017. spaces for Smudging Ceremonies. No additional advancements since then. The outdoor patio adjacent to the Bahen Centre is being redesigned. The design committee is discussing ways to feature Use a participatory design approach, the close connection between Indigenous with key members of Indigenous Indigenous Spaces — 2 people and the land, the importance of communities, to (re)develop existing water in Indigenous culture and/or bring spaces as Indigenous spaces. attention to the failing of the engineering infrastructure to supply safe drinking water to Indigenous communities. Anishnaabe artist Solomon King was commissioned to complete a sculpture (footprint 5’ x 2’) celebrating the Gull Lake experience. Currently on display in the Professional Masters’ Student lounge on Level 6 of the Myhal Centre, it will be moved to the new structure at Gull Lake when complete. Use a participatory design approach, with Indigenous Spaces — 3 key members of Indigenous communities, King has also been commissioned to to commission Indigenous artwork. create a larger art piece (16’ x 6’) to be permanently displayed on Level 2’s southern staircase in the Myhal Centre.

Working with the U of T Art Museum, ten other Indigenous paintings were installed in various locations throughout the Myhal Centre in 2019. Use a participatory design approach, with key members of Indigenous Indigenous Spaces — 4 No advancement. communities, to establish educational installations in engineering spaces.

Community 45 Form an ongoing Indigenous Space committee, with Indigenous community members, with ongoing funding tasked Indigenous Spaces — 5 to identify additional spaces for naming No advancement. and/or (re)development as Indigenous spaces, locations for Indigenous artwork and educational installations. Work with Indigenous Language experts Indigenous Spaces — 6 to identify and display Indigenous names No advancement. within the Faculty where appropriate. Create a prominent, permanent Indigenous Spaces — 7 physical representation of the No advancement. land acknowledgement. Upcoming: A Blanket Exercise is a kinesthetic learning exercise designed Implement ongoing cultural competency to educate non-Indigenous people on training for all staff and faculty. the history of the Indigenous People of Canada including the ways education Indigenous Student Access — 1 Note: This action strongly overlaps with has been used as a weapon against another recommendation, Faculty & Staff Indigenous people. Arrangements for — 3. Progress items for both actions the two-day facilitated training session are cross-referenced to each other. are underway to be held when in-person interaction resumes on campus. Future facilitators are being recruited. Multiple U of T Engineering entrance scholarships for Indigenous students (domestic tuition plus stipend) have been created. They are renewable for four years. The details of the qualifications and application process are still being developed with representatives of the Student Access Working Group. Begin targeted recruiting for Indigenous Student Access — 2 Indigenous students. All self-declared Indigenous applicants were contacted by Professor Jason Bazylak offering a personal connection and specific assistance with the application.

The first annual Welcome to Engineering event specifically for Indigenous students was held online on May 30, 2020. Create a full-time position, to be held by an Indigenous hire, to coordinate cultural Indigenous Student Access — 3 See progress for Faculty & Staff — 1 competency training and outreach and recruitment of Indigenous students. Create a separate Access Indigenous Student Access — 4 Pathway to engineering studies No advancement. for Indigenous students. Begin building relationships with Indigenous Student Access — 5 No advancement. Indigenous communities. Determine if a process is needed Indigenous Student Access — 6 to verify student applicant claims Under development. for Indigenous background. Run regular Blanket Exercise events See progress for Faculty & Staff — 3 Indigenous Curriculum — 2 for students, staff and faculty. and Indigenous Student Access — 1

46 Community Short-Term Actions (2019–2021) Recommendation Description Progress Work toward making U of T an employer Faculty & Staff — 4 No advancement. of choice for the Indigenous community. Provide support for Faculty & Staff — 5 No advancement. Indigenous employees. Community outreach. Expand and develop relationships with communities. Create community Faculty & Staff — 6 partnerships. Establish connections No advancement. with Indigenous professionals in the community, such as Aboriginal Professionals Association of Canada. Provide financial support for Elder services. Work with First Nations House Faculty & Staff — 7 and the Provost’s Office of Indigenous No advancement. Initiatives to determine how best to provide Elder support within the Faculty. Create an Indigenous Office Negotiations about organizational structure Indigenous Spaces — 8 within U of T Engineering. and space have begun and continue. Initiate a pilot engineering Indigenous Student Access — 7 outreach program for Indigenous No advancement. high school students. Create a transition program Indigenous Student Access — 8 No advancement. for Indigenous students. Indigenous Student Access — 9 Expand the Indigenous outreach program. No advancement. Create an Indigenous Office Indigenous Student Access — 10 See progress for Faculty & Staff — 1 within U of T Engineering. Discussions are underway regarding a Diploma to Degree program being developed for the Sciences at U of T. It Work with in northern and is possible that U of T Engineering could remote areas to increase engineering participate in this program as a first step Indigenous Student Access — 11 programming in colleges (such as toward a transition program. While this engineering design) and facilitate program would not target northern or the transfer of credits. remote communities specifically, it could generate expertise within the Faculty to extend programming to these areas. Take an integrated approach to bringing Indigenous content to Development of an Indigenous Indigenous Curriculum — 1 the engineering curriculum, and Technology elective has begun. NOT add additional courses. Presentation to incoming Indigenous Better communicate the role of the students on the importance of Indigenous Indigenous Curriculum — 4 engineer as a community builder. engineers to build infrastructure for Indigenous communities. Hire one or more Indigenous Indigenous Curriculum — 5 No advancement. curriculum developers.

Community 47 Long-Term Actions (2022–2023) Recommendation Description Progress Take a Seven Generations approach Faculty & Staff — 8 to the Faculty’s relationship No advancement. with Indigenous Peoples. Spearhead the call for the Front Indigenous Spaces — 9 Campus redesign to incorporate No advancement. prominent Indigenous space. Create a symbol of Indigenous Indigenous Spaces — 10 No advancement. Engineering Positive Space. Significant preliminary work has gone into a proposed program for the Faculty to participate in the creation of an engineering program in remote Labrador. A report on this work has already been submitted prior to the release of this recommendation. The Eagles’ Longhouse Steering Committee greatly supports this proposal as a strong step towards achieving this recommendation.

The Reconciliation Through Engineering Establish a pilot engineering Indigenous Student Access — 12 Initiative (RTEI) aims to find sustainable program in a remote community. engineering solutions through community- driven, multidisciplinary and Two-Eyed Seeing collaborations, leveraging the expertise of both Indigenous community members and U of T researchers specializing in diverse fields. Overseen by the Centre for Global Engineering, RTEI will ultimately identify six projects to improve access to clean drinking water, food security, housing, health care, transportation and communication systems in Indigenous communities across Canada. Create an Indigenous culture Indigenous Curriculum — 3 No development. infusion lecture series.

48 Community Figure 3.16 Summary of Progress Against the Recommendations of Striving Toward Black Inclusivity (2019) as prepared by the Black Inclusion Steering Committee (BISC), 2020

Interim Recommendations (From November 2018) Description Progress A new role of Assistant Dean and Director, Diversity, Inclusion and Professional- ism (AD-DIP) was established to broadly address issues of diversity and inclu- Establish an Equity, Diversity sion within the Faculty. In May 2019, this role was filled by Marisa Sterling. & Inclusion (EDI) office BISC recommends the establishment of additional EDI-centric roles within the Faculty. BISC provided guidance and suggestions for how this data collection could be integrated into the student application process, the faculty/staff admission/hiring process, or Faculty climate or experiential surveys. Collect race-based data Building upon initiatives such as the first-year survey and the recent ‘Voice of the Engineer’ survey, efforts are underway to enable prospective students to voluntarily self-identify race and other demographic identifiers during the 2020-2021 application cycle. The Against Black Racism Campaign (ABRC) Committee organized a poster campaign which ran during BHM 2019. Acknowledge and support Black History Month (BHM) In collaboration with Engineering Strategic Communications, dedicated content was developed for Faculty websites and social media to display the variety of experience and perspective of the Black community within Engineering. This campaign ran in both 2019 and 2020. The Faculty has created an EDI webpage (engineering.utoronto.ca/about/equity- diversity-and-inclusion/) which includes a joint statement by the Dean and the Engineering Society President on “Our Shared Values of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusivity.”

Enhance and streamline The Office of the Vice Provost, Students has developed a webpage to highlight the communication to advertise institutional procedures and steps for students who wish to lodge complaints pertaining and build inclusivity efforts to potential prohibitory discrimination. This information must be integrated into the Faculty’s EDI website.

Work is underway to further define the workflow for disclosure of incidents pertaining to potential prohibitory discrimination at a Faculty level. The co-chairs of BISC brought a proposal to display scholarship of Black academics via departmental seminar or lecture series to the monthly Chairs and Directors Have Black representation meeting in March 2019. at departmental and Faculty seminar/lecture series Departments/institutes such as ISTEP have brought in Black academics to speak on their research. However, no established changes to current processes to facilitate intentional diversification have yet been implemented. Programs such as ENGage have a long history in the Faculty. In the summer of 2019, U of T Engineering Outreach ran a Summer Engineering Leadership Experience to provide Black Grade 11 students with the opportunity to engage in STEM education programming.

Have targeted Black A second iteration of the program, Blueprint, was launched in the summer of 2020. undergraduate student Blueprint is designed for highly motivated Black students in Grades 9, 10 and 11. recruitment

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Blueprint began as an online-only program with student engagement via webinars and meetups with engineering students and practicing engineers. The program will transition to in-person meetings as circumstances allow. U of T Engineering has had strong representation at the NSBE Region 1 and national Increase involvement at the conferences in 2018 and 2019 and is committed to attending the 2020 national convention NSBE National Convention as well. U of T is the first Canadian university to be an academic sponsor for the NSBE convention.

Community 49 Additional Recommendations (From September 2019)

Prospective and Current Undergraduate Students

Continual review of broad- BISC highlighted key questions that the admissions committee should consider with based admission goals and regards to reviewing and updating admission procedures through an equitable lens. procedures to further enhance the equitable and inclusive of general admissions No changes to current processes have yet been implemented. Develop alternative, gap- BISC suggested the Faculty investigate and develop means for non-traditional students spanning admission and/ to have a viable pathway into post-secondary education in Engineering/STEM. or access pathways into U of T Engineering No changes to current processes have yet been implemented. Within the Office of the Vice-Dean, Undergraduate, a new centralized Develop a centralized peer peer mentorship program known as the Engineering Campus Experience mentorship initiative Officer (Eng CEO) was established. The mentors represent a wide range of disciplines, years of study, racial and gender diversity. BISC suggested a collaboration between the offices of the Vice-Dean, Research, Engineering Outreach and Vice-President, Research & Innovation Create infrastructure to increase to develop a framework and resource that all faculty members interested in faculty engagement in Outreach or required to develop outreach programming can and should use.

No changes to current processes have yet been implemented. While the Faculty has a variety of identity-based admission scholarships (e.g. Indigenous students, mature students, Polish students) there is opportunity for financial aid and scholarships that target other traditionally disenfranchised Increase access to financial or underrepresented groups within STEM and post-secondary education aid and scholarships (e.g. Black students, first-in-the-family to attend university, etc.)

No changes to current processes have yet been implemented.

Prospective and Current Graduate Students Develop targeted workshop series to promote graduate No changes to current processes have yet been implemented school and support current graduate students Create targeted undergraduate No changes to current processes have yet been implemented research opportunities The Office of the Vice-Dean, Graduate has placed more effort into targeted recruitment of Black and other underrepresented populations through their involvement in the NSBE Fall Region 1 conference.

Applications for the Graduate Research Day 2020 recruitment event Continue to develop targeted included optional self-declaration of racial/ethnic identity. recruitment strategies

The Faculty is leveraging the Provost’s Postdoctoral Fellowship program to provide funding to increase opportunities for hiring postdoctoral fellows from underrepresented groups. One postdoctoral fellow in the Department of Civil & Mineral Engineering has been recruited through this program.

50 Community Additional Recommendations (From September 2019)

Prospective and Current Faculty The Department of Chemical Engineering & Applied Chemistry has hired a new faculty member who self-identifies as Black to start in Intentional utilization of Provost 2021, leveraging the Provost’s new faculty funding program. Office diversity-driven initiatives This hire will be the only Black faculty member at U of T Engineering. BISC recommends that other departments and divisions follow this model. BISC recommends that departments/institutes follow the Office of the Vice-Provost, Faculty & Academic Life document Strategies for Recruiting an Excellent & Diverse Faculty Complement: A guide for enhancing the diversity of applicant pools and Develop a framework to minimizing the impact of unconscious bias in assessing candidates: faculty.utoronto.ca/ facilitate diverse candidate pool wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Recruiting-Excellent-Diverse-Faculty-Complement.pdf formulation and consideration No mechanisms are in place to determine how the practices in this document are being implemented at a departmental level. Define the means to value and incentivize EDI and No changes to current processes have been implemented. mentoring work for faculty

Prospective and Current Staff Develop avenues for No changes to current processes have been implemented. mentorship Engineering Positive Space exists as a de facto affinity group for the LGBTQ community within the Faculty at all levels (students, staff, faculty). Provide opportunities for affinity group community building No Faculty-centred affinity groups/gatherings for Black community members or other identities are in place. Improve access to No changes to current processes have yet been implemented with regards to targeted secondment and professional communication to underrepresented staff highlighting opportunities and supports. development opportunities

General Integrate broader EDI considerations into Alumni and No changes to current processes have been implemented. Advancement Office operations Develop more equitable and accessible modes of No changes to current processes have been implemented. financial reimbursement and invoice generation Since Fall 2018, the Engineering Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Action Group (EEDIAG) has offered four “Open Discussions” on EDI issues as well as four Offer and incentivize more Towards Inclusive Practice Series (TIPS) sessions per year. These cover a number equity and cultural competency of topics, including impostor syndrome and creating inclusive classrooms. training for staff/faculty These initiatives are expected to continue into the 2020-2021 academic year. Establish hard targets for representation at No changes to current processes have yet been implemented. all Faculty levels

Community 51

Professor Milica Radisic (BME, ChemE) this CHAPTER 4 year received a Killam Research Fellowship from the Canada Council for the Arts to continue developing lab-grown human tissues and organs. These innovations could accelerate drug RESEARCH discovery and regenerative medicine. PHOTO: JOHNNY GUATTO

FACTS & FIGURES 121 51.8% $101.5 M U of T Engineering research Proportion of NSERC funding Total research infrastructure chairs and professorships, that comes from Industrial and research operating funding 100+ held by 110 individual Partnerships programs. for 2018–2019, an increase of U of T Engineering spinoff chairholders. 26.2% over the previous year. companies since 2000. Figure 4.1a Research Infrastructure Funding and Research Operating Funding, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019

$101.5M $10.0M

$91.5M $82.8M $82.1M $79.8M $79.2M $80.4M $17.5M $75.1M $7.3M $3.3M $22.5M $15.8M $77.1M $67.9M $11.2M $74.7M $65.1M $62.8M $5.6M $6.2M $65.3M $11.8M $62.3M $63.3M $63.9M $57.3M $58.9M $50.9M

Research Infrastructure Funds

Research Operating Funds

2009–10 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19

Figure 3.1a Breakdown of Research Infrastructure Funding vs. Research Operating Funding, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019

Chapter: Ch.3 - Research Excel Filename: 3.1a-c - Research Funding 10-19 - by yr+category (AR20 3.1a-c) - v2 (RIS).xlsx Sheet: 3.1a Date: May 6, 2020

Data is based on grant years (April to March). The figures in this chapter report research funding the Faculty received in 2018–2019. Because it takes some time after the completion of a fiscal year for research funding data to become final, this is the most recent year for which data are available.

54 Research Figure 4.1b Research Infrastructure Funding and Research Operating Funding by Year, Source and Funding per Faculty Member, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019

$434K

$382K $368K $357K $360K $101.5M $335K $343K $312K $300K $303K $82.8M $82.1M $79.8M $79.2M $80.4M $75.1M $67.9M $62.8M $65.1M

Funding per Faculty Member

Other

Industry

Gov't – Ontario

Gov't – Canada

2009–10 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19

Funding per Gov't – Canada Gov't – Ontario Industry Other Total Faculty Member 2009–10 $33,703,786 $14,040,320 $5,540,382 $9,468,322 $62,752,810 $300,253

2010–11 $40,893,725 $17,675,370 $6,212,252 $14,972,890 $79,754,237 $381,599

2011–12 $38,025,055 $6,969,732 $6,702,708 $13,384,839 $65,082,333 $302,709

2012–13 $37,092,563 $9,035,997 $6,284,230 $15,528,448 $67,941,239 $311,657

2013–14 $43,780,988 $17,068,393 $7,452,220 $14,521,054 $82,822,655 $368,101

2014–15 $45,975,701 $11,583,586 $7,658,866 $13,933,434 $79,151,587 $356,539

2015–16 $44,114,260 $11,286,280 $7,770,092 $11,910,280 $75,080,912 $335,183

2016–17 $46,853,205 $12,163,804 $9,028,158 $14,014,384 $82,059,551 $359,910

2017–18 $46,603,584 $11,388,157 $12,873,442 $9,505,231 $80,370,414 $343,463

2018–19 $56,047,293 $13,025,608 $16,669,404 $15,748,571 $101,490,875 $433,722

Figure 3.1d Total Research Funding by Year and Source and Average Funding per Faculty Member, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019

Chapter: Ch.3 - Research Sheet: 3.1d Excel Filename: 3.1a-c - Research Funding 10-19 - by yr+category (AR20 3.1a-c) - v3 (RIS).xlsx Date: May 22, 2020

Research 55 Figure 4.1c Research Operating Funding by Year, Source and Funding per Faculty Member, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019

$391K

$328K $329K $91.5M

$286K $290K $285K $285K $274K $274K $77.1M $74.7M $244K $65.3M $62.3M $63.3M $63.9M $57.3M $58.9M $50.9M Funding per Faculty Member

Other

Industry

Gov't – Ontario

Gov't – Canada

2009–10 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19

Funding per Gov't – Canada Gov't – Ontario Industry Other Total Faculty Member 2009–10 $26,342,234 $9,562,400 $5,540,382 $9,468,322 $50,913,338 $243,604

2010–11 $28,567,718 $7,520,797 $6,212,252 $14,972,890 $57,273,658 $274,037

2011–12 $34,287,390 $4,535,363 $6,702,708 $13,384,839 $58,910,300 $274,001

2012–13 $32,000,900 $8,511,021 $6,284,230 $15,528,448 $62,324,600 $285,893

2013–14 $33,545,785 $9,814,984 $7,452,220 $14,521,054 $65,334,043 $290,374

2014–15 $35,246,439 $6,486,482 $7,658,866 $13,933,434 $63,325,221 $285,249

2015–16 $37,318,481 $6,883,331 $7,770,092 $11,910,280 $63,882,184 $285,188

2016–17 $40,634,828 $11,035,186 $9,028,158 $14,014,384 $74,712,557 $327,687

2017–18 $43,893,948 $10,802,657 $12,873,442 $9,505,231 $77,075,278 $329,382

2018–19 $49,837,338 $9,196,478 $16,669,404 $15,748,571 $91,451,791 $390,820

Figure 3.1b Research Operating Funding by Year and Source and Funding per Faculty Member, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019

Chapter: Ch.3 - Research Sheet: 3.1b Excel Filename: 3.1a-c - Research Funding 10-19 - by yr+category (AR20 3.1a-c) - v3 (RIS).xlsx Date: May 22, 2020

56 Research Figure 4.2a Research Operating Funding by Year, Source and Funding per Faculty Member – University of Toronto Institute for Aerospace Studies, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019

$399k

$6M $299k $287k $282k $5M $241k $255k $218k $228k $229k $4M $147k Avg $/Faculty $3M Other $2M Industry

$1M Gov't — Ontario Gov't — Canada $0M 2009–10 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19

Gov't – Canada Gov't – Ontario Industry Other Total Avg $/Faculty 2009–10 $1,486,736 $107,333 $259,200 $349,356 $2,202,626 $146,842 2010–11 $2,261,742 $390,200 $396,929 $3,048,871 $217,776 2011–12 $4,692,107 $89,356 $420,400 $389,239 $5,591,103 $399,364 2012–13 $2,931,457 $70,157 $397,115 $337,561 $3,736,290 $287,407 2013–14 $2,485,293 $35,707 $342,396 $1,368,789 $4,232,186 $282,146 2014–15 $2,458,871 $50,000 $584,609 $518,655 $3,612,134 $240,809 2015–16 $2,216,737 $130,258 $674,557 $396,078 $3,417,629 $227,842 2016–17 $2,381,974 $603,265 $313,998 $362,281 $3,661,518 $228,845 2017–18 $2,390,069 $1,559,971 $474,246 $365,376 $4,789,662 $299,354 2018–19 $2,116,466 $889,637 $483,164 $843,587 $4,332,854 $254,874

Figure E.2 University of Toronto Institute for Aerospace Studies Research Operating Funding by Source and Average Funding per Faculty Member, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019

Chapter: Appendix E - Research Funding by Academic Area Excel Filename: 4.3a-c - PEY Placements - Cdn+Intl - 1011-1920 (AR20 4.3a-c) - v3.xlsx Sheet: E.2 (AER) Date: May 7, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

Gov't — Canada Gov't — Ontario Industry Other Avg $/Faculty Note 4.2a-g: Data is based on grant years (April to March). Figures show research operating funding only — funding received under the following research infrastructure programs is excluded: Canada Foundation for Innovation (except the CFI Career Award); NSERC Research Tools & Instruments program for faculty; Ontario Innovation Trust; and Ontario Research Fund – Research Infrastructure.

Research 57 Figure 4.2b Research Operating Funding by Year, Source and Funding per Faculty Member – Institute of Biomedical Engineering, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019

$10M $706k $9M $574k $8M $547k $7M $440k $434k $6M $431k $366k $376k $5M $332k $336k Avg $/Faculty $4M Other $3M Industry $2M Gov't — Ontario $1M Gov't — Canada $0M 2009–10 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19

Gov't – Canada Gov't – Ontario Industry Other Total Avg $/Faculty 2009–10 $2,144,759 $239,594 $375,037 $1,637,566 $4,396,956 $439,696 2010–11 $2,151,571 $170,685 $165,534 $1,856,560 $4,344,349 $434,435 2011–12 $2,275,392 $32,004 $1,348,193 $3,655,589 $365,559 2012–13 $2,344,646 $61,148 $167,789 $1,080,669 $3,654,252 $332,205 2013–14 $2,790,844 $1,301 $1,237,634 $4,029,779 $335,815 2014–15 $3,153,427 $346,061 $1,245,302 $4,744,790 $431,345 2015–16 $3,069,858 $192,675 $4,802 $865,551 $4,132,886 $375,717 2016–17 $5,015,999 $306,359 $427,108 $818,499 $6,567,965 $547,330 2017–18 $5,338,091 $175,245 $285,487 $1,085,567 $6,884,391 $573,699 2018–19 $5,910,918 $230,719 $373,191 $1,254,443 $7,769,271 $706,297

Figure 4.2c ResearchFigure Operating E.3 Funding by Year, Source and Funding per Faculty Member – Department of Chemical EngineeringInstitute & Applied of Biomaterials Chemistry, 2009–2010& Biomedical to 2018–2019 Engineering Research Operating Funding by Source and Average Funding per Faculty Member, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019 $699k $657k $654k $20M $646k $540k $498k $511k $15M $454k Chapter: Appendix$460k E - Research Funding by Academic Area Excel Filename: 4.3a-c - PEY Placements - Cdn+Intl - 1011-1920 (AR20 4.3a-c) - v3.xlsx $346k Sheet: E.3 (BME) Avg $/Faculty $10M Date: May 7, 2020 Other Prepared by: Geoff Wichert Industry $5M Gov't — Ontario Gov't — Canada $0M 2009–10 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19

Gov't – Canada Gov't – Ontario Industry Other Total Avg $/Faculty 2009–10 $5,042,379 $1,264,697 $835,642 $1,502,522 $8,645,240 $345,810 2010–11 $6,164,266 $514,057 $1,261,227 $3,399,936 $11,339,486 $453,579 2011–12 $5,802,379 $1,283,132 $1,897,761 $4,450,227 $13,433,500 $497,537 2012–13 Gov't$5,872,641 — Canada $3,374,496 $1,990,738 $5,850,763 $17,088,638 $657,255 2013–14 Gov't$5,526,121 — Ontario $2,817,237 $1,770,656 $2,296,491 $12,410,505 $459,648 2014–15 Industry$6,919,763 $1,174,433 $920,026 $5,555,113 $14,569,334 $539,605 2015–16 Other$7,869,414 $1,950,027 $962,888 $3,012,675 $13,795,004 $510,926 2016–17 Avg$8,861,036 $/Faculty $2,910,730 $570,070 $5,831,698 $18,173,533 $698,982 2017–18 $10,288,385 $2,600,541 $2,715,418 $1,394,275 $16,998,620 $653,793 2018–19 $8,923,513 $2,153,458 $1,574,303 $4,802,497 $17,453,771 $646,436

58 ResearchFigure E.4 Department of Chemical Engineering & Applied Chemistry Research Operating Funding by Source and Average Funding per Faculty Member, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019

Chapter: Appendix E - Research Funding by Academic Area Excel Filename: 4.3a-c - PEY Placements - Cdn+Intl - 1011-1920 (AR20 4.3a-c) - v3.xlsx Sheet: E.4 (CHE) Date: May 7, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

Gov't — Canada Gov't — Ontario Industry Other Avg $/Faculty Figure 4.2d Research Operating Funding by Year, Source and Funding per Faculty Member – Department of Civil & Mineral Engineering, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019

$328k $14M $280k $12M $248k $235k $10M $219k $219k $181k $8M $159k $158k Avg $/Faculty

$6M $117k Other $4M Industry

$2M Gov't — Ontario Gov't — Canada $0M 2009–10 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19

Gov't – Canada Gov't – Ontario Industry Other Total Avg $/Faculty 2009–10 $2,154,607 $412,542 $931,988 $1,732,687 $5,231,825 $158,540 2010–11 $1,981,370 $1,097,073 $747,127 $3,399,792 $7,225,361 $218,950 2011–12 $1,991,794 $402,645 $515,246 $1,428,083 $4,337,768 $117,237 2012–13 $2,358,881 $1,121,005 $585,360 $1,941,535 $6,006,780 $158,073 2013–14 $2,892,286 $2,069,442 $470,776 $3,041,897 $8,474,400 $235,400 2014–15 $3,037,368 $727,715 $491,188 $1,896,258 $6,152,529 $180,957 2015–16 $3,534,019 $906,960 $1,072,331 $2,137,592 $7,650,902 $218,597 2016–17 $4,477,039 $3,266,681 $715,923 $2,470,989 $10,930,632 $280,273 2017–18 $4,614,922 $2,816,542 $981,529 $1,756,620 $10,169,614 $248,039 2018–19 $5,583,105 $3,131,691 $2,038,270 $2,354,933 $13,107,999 $327,700

Figure 4.2e ResearchFigure Operating E.5 Funding by Year, Source and Funding per Faculty Member – The Edward S. RogersDepartment Sr. Department of Civil of Electrical & Mineral & EngineeringComputer Engineering, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019 Research Operating Funding by Source and Average Funding per Faculty Member, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019 $405k $30M

$25M $297k $291k $276k $262kChapter: Appendix E - Research Funding by Academic Area $245k $252k $255k $20M $236k Excel Filename: 4.3a-c - PEY Placements$232k - Cdn+Intl - 1011-1920 (AR20 4.3a-c) - v3.xlsx Sheet: E.5 (CIV) Avg $/Faculty $15M Date: May 7, 2020 Other Prepared by: Geoff Wichert $10M Industry

$5M Gov't — Ontario Gov't — Canada $0M 2009–10 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19

Gov't – Canada Gov't – Ontario Industry Other Total Avg $/Faculty 2009–10 $7,657,716 $3,371,903 $1,460,500 $2,836,755 $15,326,874 $235,798 2010–11 $8,146,160 $2,410,791 $2,134,524 $3,477,284 $16,168,758 $244,981 2011–12 $9,874,991 $977,439 $2,891,234 $3,546,234 $17,289,899 $261,968 2012–13 Gov't$9,122,947 — Canada $2,124,989 $2,275,037 $3,626,475 $17,149,447 $252,198 2013–14 Gov't$10,106,855 — Ontario $2,250,783 $3,184,516 $4,295,002 $19,837,156 $275,516 2014–15 Industry$10,919,509 $2,160,215 $3,203,168 $2,085,517 $18,368,410 $255,117 2015–16 Other$10,420,574 $843,513 $3,025,580 $2,430,366 $16,720,033 $232,223 2016–17 Avg$10,605,077 $/Faculty $3,200,096 $4,870,089 $2,401,247 $21,076,509 $296,852 2017–18 $11,089,416 $2,487,824 $5,158,654 $1,923,360 $20,659,254 $290,975 2018–19 $15,070,577 $1,736,420 $8,110,598 $3,819,335 $28,736,930 $404,745

Figure E.6 Research 59 The Edward S. Rogers Sr. Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering Research Operating Funding by Source and Average Funding per Faculty Member, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019

Chapter: Appendix E - Research Funding by Academic Area Excel Filename: 4.3a-c - PEY Placements - Cdn+Intl - 1011-1920 (AR20 4.3a-c) - v3.xlsx Sheet: E.6 (ECE) Date: May 7, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

Gov't — Canada Gov't — Ontario Industry Other Avg $/Faculty Figure 4.2f Research Operating Funding by Year, Source and Funding per Faculty Member – Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019

$303k $18M $269k $267k $16M $241k $247k $248k $245k $245k $14M $220k $12M $192k $10M Avg $/Faculty

$8M Other $6M Industry $4M Gov't — Ontario $2M Gov't — Canada $0M 2009–10 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19

Gov't – Canada Gov't – Ontario Industry Other Total Avg $/Faculty 2009–10 $5,161,551 $1,554,477 $1,180,330 $1,125,847 $9,022,204 $191,962 2010–11 $6,181,418 $1,625,461 $1,337,641 $2,168,689 $11,313,210 $240,707 2011–12 $7,690,713 $1,170,375 $679,470 $2,082,577 $11,623,134 $247,301 2012–13 $7,473,427 $1,377,151 $757,191 $2,048,224 $11,655,993 $248,000 2013–14 $7,641,900 $929,834 $1,396,359 $2,019,869 $11,987,962 $244,652 2014–15 $7,016,883 $885,328 $2,007,844 $2,330,550 $12,240,605 $244,812 2015–16 $8,084,370 $975,760 $1,824,219 $2,580,489 $13,464,838 $269,297 2016–17 $6,967,616 $597,396 $1,740,732 $1,688,441 $10,994,185 $219,884 2017–18 $8,069,214 $877,882 $2,883,537 $2,323,223 $14,153,856 $267,054 2018–19 $9,729,115 $757,321 $3,405,477 $1,864,072 $15,755,985 $303,000

Figure 4.2g ResearchFigure Operating E.7 Funding by Year, Source and Funding per Faculty Member – DepartmentDepartment of Materials of Mechanical Science & & Engineering, Industrial Engineering 2009–2010 to 2018–2019 Research Operating Funding by Source and Average Funding per Faculty Member, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019 $374k $6M $336k $309k $5M $274k $280k Chapter: Appendix E - Research Funding by Academic Area$264k $234k $227k $4M Excel$213k Filename: 4.3a-c - PEY Placements - Cdn+Intl - 1011-1920 (AR20 4.3a-c) - v3.xlsx $199k Sheet: E.7 (MIE) Avg $/Faculty $3M Date: May 7, 2020 Other Prepared by: Geoff Wichert $2M Industry

$1M Gov't — Ontario Gov't — Canada $0M 2009–10 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19

Gov't – Canada Gov't – Ontario Industry Other Total Avg $/Faculty 2009–10 $1,847,850 $2,611,854 $497,685 $283,589 $5,240,977 $374,356 2010–11 $1,681,192 $1,702,731 $176,000 $273,700 $3,833,624 $273,830 2011–12 $1,960,014 $580,411 $298,597 $140,285 $2,979,307 $212,808 2012–13 Gov't$1,896,902 — Canada $382,077 $111,000 $598,253 $2,988,232 $199,215 2013–14 Gov't$2,102,486 — Ontario $1,711,981 $286,216 $223,872 $4,324,555 $308,897 2014–15 Industry$1,740,619 $1,488,791 $105,970 $302,039 $3,637,419 $279,801 2015–16 Other$2,123,510 $1,884,137 $205,715 $487,530 $4,700,892 $335,778 2016–17 Avg$2,326,088 $/Faculty $143,197 $390,239 $415,974 $3,275,497 $233,964 2017–18 $2,103,851 $284,651 $374,571 $648,974 $3,412,046 $227,470 2018–19 $2,442,395 $297,232 $684,401 $806,763 $4,230,791 $264,424

60 ResearchFigure E.8 Department of Materials Science & Engineering Research Operating Funding by Source and Average Funding per Faculty Member, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019

Chapter: Appendix E - Research Funding by Academic Area Excel Filename: 4.3a-c - PEY Placements - Cdn+Intl - 1011-1920 (AR20 4.3a-c) - v3.xlsx Sheet: E.8 (MSE) Date: May 7, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

Gov't — Canada Gov't — Ontario Industry Other Avg $/Faculty Figure 4.3 Distribution of Research Operating Funding by Academic Area, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019

$91.5M $4.3M $7.8M $77.1M $74.7M $4.8M $3.7M $17.5M $65.3M $6.6M $6.9M $62.3M $63.3M $63.9M $58.9M $4.2M $3.4M $57.3M $3.7M $3.6M $4.0M $4.1M $3.0M $5.6M $3.7M $4.7M $17.0M $50.9M $18.2M $13.1M $4.3M $3.7M $12.4M $13.8M $2.2M $14.6M $4.4M $17.1M $11.3M $13.4M $10.2M $10.9M $8.6M $8.5M $6.2M $7.7M UTIAS $7.2M $4.3M $6.0M $28.7M $5.2M BME $20.7M $19.8M $18.4M $16.7M ChemE $16.2M $17.3M $17.1M $21.1M $15.3M CivMin ECE $15.8M $12.0M $13.5M $14.2M $9.0M $11.3M $11.6M $11.7M $12.2M $11.0M MIE

$5.2M $3.8M $3.0M $3.0M $4.3M $3.6M $4.7M $3.3M $3.4M $4.2M MSE 2009–10 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19

Note: Totals include a small amount of "Other" funding not shown in the departmental bars.

Figure 3.4 Distribution of Research Operating Funding by Academic Area, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019

Chapter: Ch.3 - Research Excel Filename: 3.4 - Research Funding 10-19 - by yr+source+dept (AR20 3.4) - v2 (RIS).xlsx Sheet: 3.4 ($; no infr; bars) Date: May 24, 2020

UTIAS BME ChemE CivMin Note 4.3: TotalsECE include a small amount of additional funding not shown in the breakdown by academic areas. The research funding attributed to BMEMIE for 2018–19 represents 82% of the total funding received by faculty members in the Institute. Because of BME’s cross-disciplinaryMSE structure, some professors have their research funding processed through the Faculty of Medicine. The figure above shows only the funding that comes through U of T Engineering and is presented by grant year (April to March).

Research 61 Figure 4.4a Tri-Agency and NCE Support: CIHR, NSERC and NCE Funding, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019

$38.2M $35.4M $36.0M $0.5M $0.8M $4.4M $1.5M $31.6M $31.1M $4.2M $29.9M $3.4M $33.3M $1.5M $1.1M $28.4M $31.0M $1.7M $3.2M $3.6M $30.5M $25.3M $1.7M $3.0M $2.4M $23.0M $26.9M $26.4M $21.7M $2.1M $25.2M $1.3M $2.5M $24.3M $1.0M $1.4M $1.5M $20.3M $20.7M $19.2M

NCE

CIHR

NSERC

2009–10 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19

$1,011,185 Figure 4.4b NSERC Funding, 2018–2019 $1,489,331 $2,000,767 $10,014,213 $600,000 Figure 3.1c Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Funding, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019

Industrial PartnershipsChapter: Programs:Ch.3 $17,232,948 - Research Research Grants: $15,115,496 Excel Filename: 3.1a-c - Research Funding 10-19 - by yr+category (AR20 3.1a-c) - v2 (RIS).xlsx Sheet: 3.1c $905,396 Date: May 6, 2020

$8,512,885 $3,486,099 $727,725 $297,051 $1,112,457 $974,926 $2,121,805

Collaborative R&D Grants Discovery Grants Other NSERC Funds

Strategic Grants (Individual & Group) Discovery Accelerator Supplements

Strategic Research Networks CREATE Program Grant

Engage Grants (EG) Program Collaborative Health Research Project

Industrial Research Chairs Other Research Grants

Idea to Innovation (I2I)

Other Industrial Research Partnerships

Note 4.4b: Data as of May 2020 and based on grant year (April to March).

Figure 3.2a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Funding, 2018–2019 62 Research

Chapter: Ch.3 - Research Excel Filename: 3.2a - NSERC Funding 18-19 - by program (AR20 3.2a) - v1 (RIS).xlsx Sheet: 3.2a Date: May 6, 2020 Figure 4.4c NSERC Industrial Partnership Funding by Program, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019

Other Chairs in Design Engineering $17.2M Engage Grants (EG) Program Strategic Research Networks Industrial Research Chairs $13.9M $13.2M Idea to Innovation (I2I) $12.8M Collaborative R&D Grants $11.9M Strategic Grants $11.1M $10.1M $10.1M

$8.5M $7.6M

2009–10 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19

Other $230,000 $251,770 $328,780 $146,905 $148,381 $32,031 $178,803 $72,536 $461,023 $527,725

Chairs in Design $267,173 $69,076 $400,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $260,000 $200,000 Engineering

Engage Grants $897,115 $960,531 $1,254,468 $1,533,923 $1,362,871 $1,767,890 $1,095,326 $958,418 $974,926 (EG) Program

Strategic Research $417,293 $832,697 $1,826,000 $1,978,886 $1,935,440 $2,500,000 $2,100,000 $2,075,000 $1,050,000 $2,121,805 Networks

Industrial $493,197 $485,711 $773,964 $1,025,031 $918,349 $847,278 $1,040,762 $713,023 $868,417 $1,112,457 Research Chairs

Idea to Innovation $287,417 $448,612 $195,000 $133,750 $608,417 $669,364 $535,951 $279,835 $297,051 (I2I)

Collaborative $2,313,127 $1,909,431 $2,301,643 $2,445,210 $3,137,628 $3,347,888 $4,226,332 $5,564,099 $6,633,399 $8,512,885 R&D Grants

Strategic Grants $3,625,316 $3,567,278 $3,725,048 $2,875,127 $3,050,468 $3,001,609 $3,047,358 $2,503,150 $3,432,564 $3,486,099

Total $7,633,523 $8,461,689 $10,110,965 $10,125,627 $11,057,939 $11,900,094 $13,230,509 $12,759,084 $13,943,657 $17,232,948

Figure 3.2b NSERC Industrial Partnership Funding by Program, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019

Chapter: Ch.3 - Research Excel Filename: 3.2b+c - Industrial Partnerships - cf NSERC total - 10-19 (AR20 3.2b+c) - v1 (RIS).xlsx Sheet: 3.2b Date: May 6, 2020

Research 63 Figure 4.4d Industrial Partnerships as Percentage of Total NSERC Funding, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019

$33.3M

$31.0M $30.5M

$26.9M $26.4M $25.2M $24.3M 51.8% 41.9% 44.9%

$20.3M $20.7M 44.2% $19.2M 43.8% 50.1% 41.7%

41.7% 39.7% 48.9%

Industrial Research Partnerships Programs

Other

2009–10 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19

Figure 4.4d Industrial Partnerships as a Proportion of Total NSERC Funding, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019

Chapter: Ch.4 - Research Excel Filename: 4.4c+d - Industrial Partnerships - cf NSERC total - 10-19 (AR20 4.4c+d) - v2 (RIS).xlsx Sheet: 4.4d Date: June 17, 2020

64 Research Figure 4.4e NSERC Research Grant Funding by Program, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019

Research Tools & Instruments Other Research Grants Steacie Memorial Fellowships Collaborative Health Research Projects $16.7M CREATE Program Grants Steacie Fellowship Research Supplements $16.0M Discovery Grants Discovery Accelerator Supplements $15.1M $14.3M $13.5M $13.4M $12.5M

$11.3M $10.9M $10.0M

2009–10 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19

Other Research $422,319 $382,583 $132,000 $111,000 $40,000 $25,000 Grants

Steacie Memorial $30,000 $30,000 $60,000 $90,000 $60,000 $155,000 $125,000 Fellowships

Steacie Fellowship $187,500 $187,500 $250,000 $375,000 $250,000 $155,000 $30,000 Research Supplements

Discovery Accelerator $383,999 $464,000 $504,000 $720,000 $760,000 $760,000 $716,285 $719,970 $600,000 $600,000 Supplements

Research Tools $1,477,017 $1,533,781 $3,043,029 $1,218,076 $1,654,682 $146,872 $3,553,549 $2,011,907 $948,685 & Instruments

Collaborative Health Research $378,774 $366,899 $696,536 $846,731 $1,060,212 $950,376 $1,249,571 $1,338,873 $1,699,697 $1,489,331 Projects

CREATE $450,000 $900,000 $1,050,000 $1,096,000 $1,797,084 $1,969,779 $1,650,000 $2,100,000 $2,189,233 $2,000,767 Program Grants

Discovery $7,617,106 $7,464,405 $7,650,892 $7,726,942 $8,256,362 $8,516,417 $8,390,179 $8,657,937 $9,357,300 $10,076,713 Grants

Total $10,946,715 $11,329,168 $10,033,428 $13,543,702 $13,401,734 $14,316,254 $12,502,907 $16,680,328 $16,038,137 $15,115,496

Figure 3.2d NSERC Research Grant Funding by Program, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019

Chapter: Ch.3 - Research Excel Filename: 3.2d - Research Grants by Prog - 10-19 (AR20 3.2d) - v1 (RIS).xlsx Sheet: 3.2d Date: May 6, 2020

Research 65 Figure 4.5a Canadian Peer Universities vs. University of Toronto Share of NSERC Funding for Engineering Cumulative Five-Year Share, 2014–2015 to 2018–2019

UU TorontoToronto 9.8% U Waterloo 9.5% U Alberta 8.1% U British Columbia 7.0% McGill U 6.0% É Polytech Montréal 4.9% McMaster U 4.8% U Calgary 3.9% U Laval 3.6% Western U 3.3% Queen's U 3.1% U Sherbrooke 3.1% Concordia U 2.6% Simon Fraser U 2.5% U Ottawa 2.4% É Tech Supérieure 2.2% University of Toronto Carleton U 2.2% Dalhousie U 2.1% Ontario Universities Ryerson U 2.0% Other Canadian Universities

Figure 4.5b U of T Annual Share of NSERC Funding in Engineering, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019 Figure 3.3a Canadian Peer Universities vs. University of Toronto Share of NSERC Funding for 2009–10Engineering Cumulative9.4% Five-Year Share, 2014–2015 to 2018–2019 2010–11 9.0% 2011–12 9.5% 2012–13 9.0% Chapter: Ch.3 - Research 2013–14Excel Filename: 3.3a+b9.6% - UofT Share of NSERC Funding - 1415-1819 5-yr (AR20 3.3a+b) - v2.xlsx 2014–15 Sheet: 3.3a9.5% 2015–16 Date: May10.0% 12, 2020 2016–17 Prepared by: Geoff9.9% Wichert 2017–18 10.1% 2018–19 9.4%

Figure 3.3b U of T Annual Share of NSERC Funding in Engineering, Labels:2009–2010 to 2018–2019

Note 4.5a, b: DataUniversity are from of the Toronto NSERC advanced search website and are shown by NSERC’s fiscal year (April to March). Ontario Universities Other CanadianChapter: UniversitiesCh.3 - Research 66 ResearchExcel Filename: 3.3a+b - UofT Share of NSERC Funding - 1415-1819 5-yr (AR20 3.3a+b) - v2.xlsx Sheet: 3.3b Date: May 12, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert Figure 4.6a Industry Research Funding by Academic Area, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019

UTIAS $16.7M BME ChemE

CivMin $12.9M ECE MIE MSE $9.0M

$7.8M $7.5M $7.7M $6.7M $6.2M $6.3M $5.5M

2009–10 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19

UTIAS $259,200 $390,200 $420,400 $397,115 $342,396 $584,609 $674,557 $313,998 $474,246 $483,164

BME $375,037 $165,534 $167,789 $1,301 $346,061 $4,802 $427,108 $285,487 $373,191

ChemE $835,642 $1,261,227 $1,897,761 $1,990,738 $1,770,656 $920,026 $962,888 $570,070 $2,715,418 $1,574,303

CivMin $931,988 $747,127 $515,246 $585,360 $470,776 $491,188 $1,072,331 $715,923 $981,529 $2,038,270

ECE $1,460,500 $2,134,524 $2,891,234 $2,275,037 $3,184,516 $3,203,168 $3,025,580 $4,870,089 $5,158,654 $8,110,598

MIE $1,180,330 $1,337,641 $679,470 $757,191 $1,396,359 $2,007,844 $1,824,219 $1,740,732 $2,883,537 $3,405,477

MSE $497,685 $176,000 $298,597 $111,000 $286,216 $105,970 $205,715 $390,239 $374,571 $684,401

Total $5,540,382 $6,212,252 $6,702,708 $6,284,230 $7,452,220 $7,658,866 $7,770,092 $9,028,158 $12,873,442 $16,669,404

Figure 3.5a Industry Research Funding by Academic Area, 2009–2010 to 2018–2019

Chapter: Ch.3 - Research Excel Filename: 3.5a - Coporate Research Funding by Dept - 10-19 (AR20 3.5a) - v2 (RIS).xlsx Sheet: 3.5a Date: May 6, 2020

Research 67 Figure 4.6b Industry Partnerships, 2019–2020

● 3E Nano Inc. ● Calera ● DCL International ● ABB Group ● CalEnergy Generation ● Defence Science & Techology ● Advanced Measurement and ● Calgon Carbon Corp. Canadian Lab (UK) Analysis Group Inc. Institute of Steel Construction ● Dell ● Advanced Micro Devices Inc. ● Canadian Nuclear Safety ● Detour Gold Corp. ● Advanis Commission ● Deveron ● Aerodyne ● Canadian Precast/Prestressed ● Dionex ● Afsan Engineering Co. Concrete Institute ● Dongwon Technology Co. Ltd. ● AGFA ● Canadian Urban Transit Research ● Domtar Inc. ● Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd. & Innovation Consortium ● Dr. Robot Inc. ● Agrium Inc. ● Candu Energy Inc. ● Drone Delivery Canada ● Airbus SAS ● Candu Owners Group ● Droplet Measurement Technologies ● Alcan Aluminum International ● Candura Instruments ● DSO National Laboratories ● Alcohol Countermeasure Systems ● CanSyn Chem Corp. ● DuPont Canada Inc. ● Altera Corp. ● Carbon Cure Technologies ● Eavor Technologies Inc. ● AMAG Ltd. ● Cardinal Health ● eCamion Incorporated ● AMEC Foster Wheeler ● Carter Holt Harvey Ltd. ● Eclipse Scientific Inc. ● Americas Styrenics LLC ● Cascades ● Ecobee Inc. ● Analog Devices Inc. ● Cast Connex Corp. ● Ecosynthetix ● Andec Manufacturing Ltd. ● CD Nova ● Eco-Tec Inc. ● Andritz Group ● Celestica ● Eldorado Brasil ● Anemoi Technologies Inc. ● CellScale Biomaterials Testing ● Electrovaya Inc. ● Angstrom Engineering Inc. ● Celulose Nipo-Brasileira ● Eli Lilly Research Laboratories ● Antex Western ● Cement Association of Canada ● EllisDon ● Inc. ● Center for Automotive Materials ● Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. ● Applanix and Manufacturing ● Energent Inc. ● Apple ● Centre Line Ltd. ● Engineering Services Inc. ● Aquafor Beech ● Chemetry ● ENMAX Power Corp. ● ArcelorMittal Dofasco ● Christie Digital Systems Canada Inc. ● Ensyn Technologies Inc. ● Armacell ● Chrysler Canada Inc. ● ERCO Worldwide ● Artium Technologies ● Ciena Canada Inc. ● Ericsson Canada Inc. ● Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd. ● CIMA Canada Inc. ● ESG Solutions ● AUG Signals Ltd. ● Clearpath Robotics ● exactEarth Inc. ● Autodesk ● Clyde-Bergemann Inc. ● Exigence Technologies ● AV Nackawic Group ● CMC Electronics ● Expert Process Solutions (XPS) ● Avalon Rare Metals ● Colibri Technologies ● Explora Foundation ● Avertus Epilepsy Technologies Inc. ● COM DEV International Ltd. ● Exxon Mobil Corp. ● Babcock & Wilcox Ltd. ● Commissariat à l’energie atomique ● Facca Inc. ● BaoWu Steel Group Corp. ● ConCast Pipe ● Fibria Celulose ● Corp. ● Concretec Ltd. ● Fidelity Canada ● Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. ● Connaught Foundation ● Finisar Corp. ● Bickell Foundation (J. P. Bickell) ● Cook Medical ● Flight Safety International ● BiomeRenewables ● Coraltec Inc. ● Food BioTek Corp. ● Bio-Rad Laboratories Canada Ltd. ● CPCI ● Ford Motor Company (USA) ● Blackberry ● Createx Technology (Suzhou) ● Ford Motor Company of Canada ● BMW Co., Ltd. ● FP Innovations ● Boeing ● Crosswing Inc. ● Fuji Electric Co. Ltd. ● Boise Cascade ● Curiousitate ● Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd. ● Bombardier Aerospace ● Cyberworks Robotics ● Fujitsu Labs of America Inc. ● Bombardier Inc. ● Daishowa-Marubeni International ● Futurebound Corp. ● Braskem (DMI) Ltd. ● Futurewei Technologies Inc. ● BresoTec Inc. ● Dana Canada Corp. ● G. Cinelli – Esperia Corp. ● Brican Automated Systems Inc. ● Daniels Group ● GE Energy ● Brigham & Women’s Hospital ● Dasaerospace Inc. ● GE Global Research ● CAE ● Datatrends Research Corp. ● GE Zenon

68 Research ● Gedex Inc. ● JDS Uniphase Inc. ● Nestle Canada ● Gener8 Inc. ● JITRI Micro and Nano Automation ● New World Laboratories ● General Dynamics Canada ● JNE Chemicals ● Newterra ● General Electric Canada ● Johnson Matthey ● Nike Inc. ● General Electric Inc. ● Kapik Integration ● Northern Yashi Engineering ● General Motors of Canada Ltd. ● Kasai Kogyo Co. Ltd. Construction, Ltd. ● Genpak ● Kevin Quan Studios ● NUCAP Global ● Geosyntec Consultants ● Keysight Technologies Canada Inc. ● Nuclear Waste Management ● Gerdau Long Steel North America ● Kiln Flame Systems Ltd. Organization ● GHGSat Inc. ● Kimberly-Clark Corp. ● NXP Semiconductors Netherlands BV ● GlaxoSmithKline Inc. ● Kinetica Dynamics ● OCMR ● Glencore Canada Corp. ● Kinross Gold Corp. ● Olympus Canada ● Goodrich Landing Gear ● Klabin ● Olympus NDT Canada ● Grafoid Inc. ● KQS Inc. ● Ontario Clean Water Agency ● Greencore Composites ● Krauss Maffei Corp. ● Ontario Power Generation Inc. ● Groupe Mequaltech Inc. ● Kumho Petrochemical R & D Center ● Ontario Renal Network ● GTAA Toronto Pearson ● Laboratoire d’essai Mequaltech ● Opal-RT Technologies Inc. ● GVA Lighting ● LaFarge Canada ● ORNGE Medical Transport ● Hanwha Solar Canada ● Lallemand Inc. ● Ossur Canada Inc. ● Hard Rock Innovations Inc. ● Lattice Semiconductor Ltd. ● OtoSim ● Hatch Ltd. ● Leader’s Circle ● OZ Optics Ltd ● Havelaar Canada ● LG Chem ● Pall Corp. ● Hawker Siddeley Canada ● LightMachinery Inc. ● Perkin Elmer Canada ● HDR Corp. ● Lisgar Construction Company ● Petronas Canada ● Hedgefog Research Inc. ● Litens Automotove Group ● Philips Electronics North ● Hitachi High-Technologies Canada ● Lubrizol America Corp. ● Holcim Inc. ● Lumentra Inc. ● Plasco Energy Group ● Honeywell ● MacDonald, Dettwiler and ● Platinum Unlimited Inc. ● Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. Associates (MDA) Ltd. ● Polumiros Inc. ● Hunch Manifest Inc. ● Magellan Aerospace ● Polycon Industries ● Huron Digital Pathology ● Magna Closures ● Porewater Solutions ● Hydro One Networks ● Magna Exteriors and Interiors ● Potent Group Inc. ● Hydro Quebec ● Magna International Inc. ● Pratt & Whitney Canada Inc. ● Hydrogenics ● Magna Powertrain ● PrecisionHawk ● Hyundai Motor Company ● Manitoba Hydro ● Process Research Ortech Inc. ● IBI Group ● Mantech Inc. ● Procter & Gamble ● IBM Canada Ltd. ● Marmak Information Technologies ● Prothena Biosciences Inc. ● IBM T. J. Watson Research Center ● Materials & Manufacturing Ontario ● Purolator ● IMAX Corp. ● Maxim Integrated Products Inc. ● QD Solar Inc. ● Imperial Oil Ltd. ● McEwen Mining Inc. ● Qualcomm Canada Inc. ● Independent Electricity System ● MeadWestvaco (MWV) Corp. ● Qualcomm Technologies Inc. Operator (IESO) ● Mercedes-Benz Canada Inc. ● Quanser Inc. ● Indian Oil Company ● Messier-Bugatti-Dowty ● Quantum Dental Technologies ● Industrial Thermo Polymers Ltd. ● Messier-Dowty Inc. (QDT) Inc. ● Ingenia Polymers Corp. ● Metso Pulp, Paper and Power ● Questor Technologies Inc. ● Inphi Corp. ● Microbonds Inc. ● Quorum Technologies Inc. ● Institute for Energy Technology ● Micropilot ● RBC – (Norway) ● Millipore ● Regeneron Pharmaceuticals ● Integran Technologies Inc. ● Mine Environment Neutral Drainage ● RESCON ● Intel Corp. ● Mitsubishi Rayon Co. Ltd. ● Resertrac Inc. ● Interface Biologics Inc. ● Moldflow Corp. ● Resonance Ltd. ● International Business Machines ● Monaghan Biosciences Ltd. ● Resource Systems Group Inc. (IBM) ● Nanowave ● Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. ● International Paper Company ● NanoXplore Inc. ● Robert Bosch Corp. ● Ionicon ● National Aeronautical Establishment ● Rockwell International ● Ionics Mass Spectrometry Group Inc. (USA) ● Rocscience Inc. ● IRISNDT Corp. ● NatureWorks LLC ● Rolls Royce Canada Ltd. ● Irving Pulp & Paper Ltd. ● NCK Engineering ● Rubikloud Technologies Inc.

Research 69 ● RWDI ● StemCell Tecnologies Inc. ● TSI ● Safety Power Inc. ● StoraEnso ● Ultrasonix ● Safran Electronics Canada ● Sulzer Metco ● Uncharted Software Inc. ● Samsung Advanced Institute of ● Suncor Energy Inc. ● Unisearch Associates Technology ● Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre ● US Steel Canada ● Samsung Display ● Sunwell Technologies ● VAC Aero International Inc. ● Samsung Electronics ● Suzano Papel e Celulose ● Vale Canada Ltd. ● Pasteur ● Synbra ● Valmet Ltd. ● Saudi Basic Industries Corp. (SABIC) ● Syncrude Canada Ltd. ● Vicicog ● Sceye Inc. ● Teck Resources Ltd. ● VisImage Systems Inc. ● Schlumberger Canada Ltd. ● Teledyne ISCO ● Visual8 Corp. ● Sealed Air Corp. ● TELUS ● Volkswagen Canada Inc. ● Semiconductor Research Corp. ● Telus Mobility ● VTT Technical Research Centre ● Sensor Technology Ltd. ● Tembec Industries Inc. of Finland ● S-FRAME Software Inc. ● Tenova GoodFellow Inc. ● Waterloo Instruments Inc. ● ShawCor ● Tessonics Inc. ● Westport Innovations ● Shinil Chemical Industry Co. Ltd. ● Thales Canada Inc. ● Whitemud Resources ● Side Effects Software ● The Iron Ore Company of ● WSP Canada Inc. ● Sidewalk Toronto Employees Ltd. Canada (IOC) ● Wugang Canada Resources ● Siemens ADGT ● The Miller Group Invest. Ltd. ● Sinclair Interplanetary ● Theralase Inc. ● Wurth Elektronik eiSos GmbH ● Sinclair Technologies Inc. ● ThermoFisher Scientific & Co. KG ● Solantro Semiconductor Corp. ● Tolko Industries Ltd. ● Wuzhong Instrument Company ● Solar Ship Inc. ● Toronto Hydro ● Xilinx Inc. ● Solvay Specialty Polymers ● Total American Services Inc. ● Xiphos Technologies Inc. ● Sony Corp. ● Tower Automotive ● XOR-Labs Toronto ● SPP Canada Aircraft Inc. ● Tower Solutions ● Zotefoams PLC ● St Mary’s Cement Group ● Toyota Collaborative Safety ● Stackpole International Research Center (CSRC) ● Stantec Inc. ● Toyota Technical Center USA Inc. ● Steel Structures Education ● TransCanada Foundation ● Trapeze Software ULC

Note 4.6b: The list above includes companies from U of T’s Research Information System, along with collaborators that fund research through a number of industrial research consortia, including those associated with many of our Industrial Research Chairs. It does not include companies that hire our students through the Professional Experience Year Co-op program, work with them on Multidisciplinary Capstone Projects, or provide philanthropic support.

70 Research Figure 4.7 Engineering Invention Disclosures by Academic Area, 2015–2016 to 2019–2020

5-Yr 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20 Total UTIAS 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0

BME 15.0 8.0 7.0 17.0 18.0 65.0

ChemE 10.0 18.0 7.0 16.0 20.0 71.0

CivE 6.0 2.0 4.0 3.0 7.0 22.0

ECE 28.0 36.0 49.0 43.0 53.0 209.0

EngSci 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 6.0

MIE 18.0 23.0 17.0 21.0 24.0 103.0

MSE 3.0 5.0 6.0 10.0 4.0 28.0

Annual Total 82.0 94.0 94.0 111.0 128.0 509.0

University 164.0 192.0 167.0 191.0 183.0 897.0 Annual Total

Engineering 50% 49% 56% 58% 70% 57% Percentage

Figure 3.6a Engineering Invention Disclosures by Academic Area, 2015–2016 to 2019–2020

Chapter: Ch.3 - Research Excel Filename: 190515 - MCollum - CommercializationReport_FY2019_Preliminary.xlsx Sheet: 3.6a Date: May 12, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

Original Data Source: Source: OVPRI Research Dashboards Tab: Comparative: Invention Discolosures

Note: IBBME is listed under Division = Engineering

Research 71 Figure 4.8 Spinoff Companies, 2001 to 2020

Est. Company Name Engineering Affiliation Department 2020 Quantum Bridge Technologies Inc. Hoi-Kwong Lo ECE 2020 Amber Molecular Inc. Tim Bender ChemE 2020 Tartan AI Ltd. Andreas Moshovos ECE 2020 CERT Systems Inc. Ted Sargent & David Sinton ECE, MIE 2020 hedQTRS Deepa Kundur ECE 2020 Mazlite Nasser Ashgriz MIE 2020 Synakis ChemE 2019 Exactly Eyewear Haonan “Alan” Li ECE 2019 Micellae Delivery Systems Inc. Mehdi Nouraei ChemE 2019 YSCOPE Ding Yuan ECE 2018 Sankoya Technologies Yu-Ling Cheng ChemE 2018 BIM2Network Tamir El-Diraby CivMin 2018 Mesosil Benjamin Hatton & Yoav Finer MSE 2018 Micromensio Glenn Gulak ECE 2018 Phenomic AI ECE 2018 Phycus Vik Pandit ChemE 2017 Centivizer Mark Chignell MIE 2017 Quthero Inc. Milica Radisic BME, ChemE 2017 Shield Crypto Systems Inc. Glenn Gulak ECE 2016 2488138 Ontario Inc. Roman Genov ECE 2016 3E Nano Inc. Nazir Kherani ECE AmacaThera Inc. (formerly Hammock 2016 Molly Soichet & Michael Cooke ChemE, BME Pharmaceuticals Inc.) 2016 Ardra Bio Inc. Radhakrishnan Mahadevan ChemE 2016 Crowd2Know Inc. Tamer El-Diraby CivMin 2016 Interface Fluidics David Sinton MIE Knitt Labs, Inc. (formerly 2016 Shuze Zhao ECE FlexCube Technology Inc.) 2016 LegUp Computing Inc. Jason Anderson & Stephen Brown ECE 2016 Polumiros Inc. Soror Sharifpoor & Kyle Battiston BME 2016 Sheba Microsystems Inc. Ridha Ben Mrad & Faez Ba-Tis MIE 2016 Sonare Inc. David Steinman & Luis Aguilar MIE

2015 Appulse Inc. (formerly ICE3 Aleksander Prodic ECE Power Technologies Inc.) 2015 Deep Genomics Inc. Brendan Frey ECE 2015 Enhanced Biomodulation Technologies Inc. Paul Yoo BME 2015 ExCellThera Inc. Peter Zandstra BME 2015 Rheo Technologies Craig Simmons MIE 2015 Tara Biosystems, Inc. Milica Radisic BME, ChemE 2014 Arrowonics Inc. Hugh Liu UTIAS 2014 Enceladeus Imaging ECE 2014 IQBiomedical David Sinton MIE 2014 Pragmatek Transport Innovations, Inc. Baher Abdulhai CivMin 2014 QD Solar Inc. Sjoerd Hoogland and Ted Sargent ECE 2014 Toronto Nano Instrumentation Inc. (TNi Inc.) Yu Sun MIE 2014 XCellPure Inc. Milica Radisic BME, ChemE 2014 XTouch Inc. Parham Aarabi ECE 2013 CoursePeer Hadi Aladdin ECE 2013 eQOL Inc. Binh Nguyen ECE 2013 Kydo Engineering John Ruggieri ChemE 2013 Lullyn Technologies Inc. Michael Joy BME

72 Research 2013 Sonas Systems Inc. ECE 2013 SpineSonics Medical Inc. Richard Cobbold BME 2013 Whirlscape Inc. Will Walmsley MIE 2012 Kinetica Dynamics Inc. Constantin Christopoulos CivMin 2012 MyTrak Health Systems Sean Doherty CivMin 2012 OTI Lumionics Inc. Zheng-Hong Lu MSE 2012 XTT Parham Aarabi ECE 2011 Aereus Technologies Inc. (formerly Aereus Wood) Javad Mostaghimi MIE 2011 Bionym Inc. Karl Martin ECE 2011 Filaser Inc. Peter Herman ECE 2011 Luminautics Inc. (formerly Ensi Solutions) Graham Murdoch MSE 2011 Nymi (formerly Bionym Inc.) Karl Martin ECE 2011 Ojiton Inc. Tom Chau BME 2011 PRISED Solar Inc. Wahid Shams-Kolahi ECE 2011 RenWave Mohamed Kamh ECE 2011 Sense Intelligent Brian Hu ECE 2011 Xagenic Canada Inc. Ted Sargent ECE 2010 Arda Power Inc. Peter Lehn ECE 2010 FOTA Technologies Tony Chan Carusone ECE 2009 Chip Care Corp. J. Stewart Aitchison ECE 2009 Cytodiagnostics Warren Chan BME 2009 Peraso Technologies Inc. Sorin Voinigescu ECE 2008 Ablazeon Inc. Javad Mostaghimi MIE 2008 Arch Power Inc. Mohammad (Reza) Iravani ECE 2008 AXAL Inc. Milos Popovic & Egor Sanin BME 2008 Incise Photonics Inc. Peter Herman ECE 2008 Quantum Dental Technologies MIE Milos Popovic, Aleksandar Prodic 2008 Simple Systems Inc. ECE, BME & Armen Baronijan 2007 002122461 Ontario Inc. Harry Ruda MSE 2007 Cast Connex Corp. Jeffrey Packer & Constantin Christopoulos CivMin 2007 Elastin Specialties Kimberly Woodhouse ChemE 2007 Inometrix Inc. Michael Galle ECE 2007 Modiface Inc. Parham Aarabi ECE 2007 Neurochip Inc. Berj Bardakjian BME 2007 Viewgenie Inc. Parham Aarabi ECE 2006 Anviv Mechatronics Inc. (AMI) Andrew Goldenberg MIE 2006 InVisage Technologies Inc. Ted Sargent ECE 2006 Metabacus Jianwen Zhu ECE 2006 Vennsa Technologies Inc. Andreas Veneris & Sean Safarpour ECE 2005 Greencore Composites Mohini Sain Forestry, ChemE 2004 Field Metrica Inc. (FMI) Tim DeMonte, Richard Yoon BME 2004 Tissue Regeneration Therapeutics Inc. (TRT) J.E. Davies BME 2003 1484667 Ontario Inc. Brad Saville ChemE 2003 ArchES Computing Systems Corp. Paul Chow ECE 2003 Norel Optronics Inc. Zheng-Hong Lu MSE 2003 Vocalage Inc. Mark Chignell MIE 2002 Information Intelligence Corporation (IIC) Burhan Turksen MIE 2002 MatRegen Corp. Molly Shoichet BME, ChemE 2002 OMDEC Inc. Andrew K.S. Jardine MIE 2002 SiREM Elizabeth Edwards ChemE 2001 Fox-Tek Rod Tennyson UTIAS 2001 Insception Biosciences Peter Zandstra BME 2001 Interface Biologics Paul Santerre BME

Research 73 Figure 4.9 Chairs and Professorships, 2019–2020

Title Chairholder Sponsor Tier Dept. Alumni Chair in Bioengineering Cristina Amon Endowed MIE Bahen/Tanenbaum Chair in Civil Engineering Jeffrey Packer Endowed CivMin Bahen/Tanenbaum Chair in Civil Engineering Michael Collins Endowed CivMin Bell Canada Chair in Multimedia Kostas Plataniotis Endowed ECE Bell Canada Chair in Software Engineering Michael Stumm Endowed ECE Bell University Labs Chair in Computer Engineering Baochun Li Endowed ECE in Advanced Cathy Chin NSERC Tier 2 ChemE Catalysis for Sustainable Chemistry Canada Research Chair in Anaerobic Biotechnology Elizabeth Edwards NSERC Tier 1 ChemE Canada Research Chair in Atmospheric Chemistry and Health Arthur Chan NSERC Tier 2 ChemE Canada Research Chair in Cellular Hybrid Materials Glenn Hibbard NSERC Tier 2 MSE Canada Research Chair in Collaborative Robotics Jonathan Kelly NSERC Tier 2 UTIAS Canada Research Chair in Computational Modelling Prasanth Nair NSERC Tier 2 UTIAS and Design Optimization Under Uncertainty Canada Research Chair in Computer Architecture Natalie Enright Jerger NSERC Tier 2 ECE Canada Research Chair in Diffusion- Andreas Mandelis NSERC Tier 1 MIE Wave Sciences and Technologies Canada Research Chair in Endogenous Repair Penney Gilbert NSERC Tier 2 BME Canada Research Chair in Engineered Arun Ramchandran NSERC Tier 2 MIE Soft Materials and Interfaces Canada Research Chair in Environmental ChemE, Elodie Passeport NSERC Tier 2 Engineering and Stable Isotopes CivMin Canada Research Chair in Freight Transportation and Logistics Matthew Roorda NSERC Tier 2 CivMin Canada Research Chair in Functional Cardiovascular Tissue Milica Radisic NSERC Tier 2 BME, ChemE Engineering Canada Research Chair in Human Factors and Transportation Birsen Donmez NSERC Tier 2 MIE Canada Research Chair in Information Processing and Machine Brendan Frey NSERC Tier 1 ECE Learning Canada Research Chair in Information Theory and Wireless Com- Wei Yu NSERC Tier 1 ECE munications Canada Research Chair in Machine Angela Schoellig NSERC Tier 2 UTIAS Learning for Robotics and Control Canada Research Chair in Micro and Yu Sun NSERC Tier 2 MIE Nano Engineering Systems Canada Research Chair in Microfluidics and Energy David Sinton NSERC Tier 1 MIE Canada Research Chair in Modelling of Electrical Interconnects Piero Triverio NSERC Tier 2 ECE Canada Research Chair in Nano- and Micro-Structured George Eleftheriades NSERC Tier 1 ECE Electromagnetic Materials and Applications Canada Research Chair in Nanobioengineering Warren Chan NSERC Tier 1 BME Canada Research Chair in Nanotechnology Edward Sargent NSERC Tier 1 ECE Canada Research Chair in Network Information Theory Ashish Khisti NSERC Tier 2 ECE Canada Research Chair in Novel Timothy Chan NSERC Tier 2 MIE Optimization and Analytics in Health Canada Research Chair in Organic Optoelectronics Zheng-Hong Lu NSERC Tier 1 MSE Canada Research Chair in Power Electronic Converters Olivier Trescases NSERC Tier 2 ECE Canada Research Chair in Quantitative Rodrigo Fernandez- NSERC Tier 2 BME Cell Biology and Morphogenesis Gonzalez Canada Research Chair in Robots for Society Goldie Nejat NSERC Tier 2 MIE

74 Research Title Chairholder Sponsor Tier Dept. Canada Research Chair in Seismic Constantin NSERC Tier 2 CivMin Resilience of Infrastructure Christopoulos Canada Research Chair in Thermofluidics for Clean Energy Aimy Bazylak NSERC Tier 2 MIE Canada Research Chair in Tissue Engineering Molly Shoichet NSERC Tier 1 ChemE, BME Canada Research Chair in Transportation and Air Quality Marianne Hatzopoulou NSERC Tier 2 CivMin Canada Research Chair in Urban Mining Innovations Gisele Azimi NSERC Tier 2 ChemE, MSE Celestica Chair in Materials for Microelectronics Doug Perovic Endowed MSE Chair in Information Engineering Joseph Paradi Endowed MIE Clarice Chalmers Chair of Engineering Design Greg Jamieson Endowed MIE Claudette MacKay-Lassonde Chair in Mineral Engineering Lesley Warren Endowed CivMin Dusan and Anne Miklas Chair in Engineering Design Paul Chow Endowed ECE Dean’s Catalyst Professor Amy Bilton MIE Dean’s Catalyst Professor Arthur Chan ChemE Dean’s Catalyst Professor Kinnor Chattopadhyay MSE Dean’s Catalyst Professor Eric Diller MIE Dean’s Catalyst Professor Jennifer Drake CivMin Dean’s Catalyst Professor Jonathan Kelly UTIAS Dean’s Catalyst Professor Edmond W.K. Young MIE Dean’s Emerging Innovation in Teaching Professor Chris Bouwmeester BME Dean’s Emerging Innovation in Teaching Professor Ariel Chan ChemE Dean’s Emerging Innovation in Teaching Professor Jennifer Farmer ChemE Dean’s Emerging Innovation in Teaching Professor Dawn Kilkenny BME Dean’s Emerging Innovation in Teaching Professor Elham Marzi ISTEP Dean’s Emerging Innovation in Teaching Professor Patricia Sheridan ISTEP Dean’s Emerging Innovation in Teaching Professor Hamid Timorabadi ECE Dean’s Emerging Innovation in Teaching Professor Chirag Variawa ISTEP Dean’s Spark Professor Fae Azhari CivMin, MIE Dean’s Spark Professor Giselle Azimi ChemE Dean’s Spark Professor Erin Bobicki MSE, ChemE Dean’s Spark Professor Merve Bodur MIE Hai-Ling Margaret Dean’s Spark Professor BME, ECE Cheng Dean’s Spark Professor Mason Ghafghazi CivMin, MIE Dean’s Spark Professor Alison Olechowski MIE, ISTEP Dean’s Spark Professor Daniel Posen CivMin Dean’s Spark Professor Scott Sanner MIE Dean’s Spark Professor Shoshanna Saxe CivMin Dean’s Spark Professor Marianne Touchie CivMin, MIE Dean’s Spark Professor Yu Zou MSE Decanal Chair in Innovation Christopher Yip Endowed Dean’s Office Edward S. Rogers Sr. Chair in Engineering Brendan Frey Endowed ECE Erwin Edward Hart Professor in Chemical Alison McGuigan Endowed ChemE Engineering and Applied Chemistry Erwin Edward Hart Professor in Civil Engineering Daman Panesar Endowed CivMin Erwin Edward Hart Professor in Materials Chandra Veer Singh Endowed MSE Science and Engineering Erwin Edward Hart Professor in Mechanical Tobin Filleter Endowed MIE and Industrial Engineering

Research 75 Title Chairholder Sponsor Tier Dept. Eugene V. Polistuk Chair in Electromagnetic Design Costas Sarris Endowed ECE Frank Dottori Chair in Pulp and Honghi Tran Endowed ChemE Gerald R. Heffernan Chair in Materials Processing Mansoor Barati Endowed MSE J. Armand Bombardier Foundation Chris Damaren Endowed UTIAS Chair in Aerospace Flight L. Lau Chair in Electrical and Computer Engineering Reza Iravani Endowed ECE Michael E. Charles Chair in Chemical Engineering Michael Sefton Endowed ChemE, BME Nortel Institute Chair in Emerging Technology J. Stewart Aitchison Endowed ECE Nortel Institute Chair in Network Architecture and Services Jörg Liebeherr Endowed ECE NSERC Chair in Multidisciplinary Engineering Design Kamran Behdinan NSERC MIE NSERC Industrial Research Chair in Nanomaterials and Nanomedicine (with Johnson & Johnson Frank Gu NSERC ChemE Medical Products) NSERC Industrial Research Chair in Source Water Quality Monitoring and Advanced/Emerging Technologies for Robert Andrews NSERC CivMin Drinking Water Treatment NSERC Industrial Research Chair in Technologies for Ron Hofmann NSERC CivMin Drinking Water Treatment NSERC Industrial Research Chair in the Role and Fate of Nikolai DeMartini NSERC ChemE Inorganics in the Industrial Processing of Woody Biomass NSERC/Altera Industrial Research Chair in Programmable Vaughn Betz NSERC/Altera ECE Silicon NSERC/Cement Association of Canada Industrial Re- Doug Hooton NSERC/CAC CivMin search Chair in Concrete Durability and Sustainability NSERC-Energi Simulation Industrial Research Chair and NSERC/Energi Foundation CMG Industrial Research Chair in Fundamen- Giovanni Graselli CivMin Simulation tal Petroleum Rock Physics and Rock Mechanics NSERC/NanoXplore Industrial Research Chair in Multi- NSERC/NanoX- Chul Park MIE functional Graphene-based Nanocomposites and Foams plore NSERC/P&WC Industrial Research Chair in Aviation Gas Turbine Combustion/Emissions Sam Sampath NSERC/P&WC UTIAS Research and Design System Optimization NSERC/UNENE Industrial Research Chair in Corrosion Control and Materials Roger Newman NSERC/UNENE ChemE Performance in Nuclear Power Systems Percy Edward Hart Professor in Aerospace Engineering Philippe Lavoie Endowed UTIAS Percy Edward Hart Professor in Biomaterials Jonathan Rocheleau Endowed BME and Biomedical Engineering Percy Edward Hart Professor in Electrical Natalie Enright Jerger Endowed ECE and Computer Engineering Pierre Lassonde Chair in Mining Engineering John Hadjigeorgiou Endowed CivMin Robert M. Smith Chair in Geotechnical Kamran Esmaeili Endowed CivMin Mine Design and Analysis Skoll Chair in Computer Networks Elvino Sousa Endowed ECE and Enterprise Innovation Skoll Chair in Software Engineering Jason Anderson Endowed ECE Stanley Ho Professorship in Microelectronics Sorin Voinigescu Endowed ECE The Stanley L. Meek Chair in Advanced Nanotechnology Harry Ruda Endowed MSE U of T Distinguished Professor of Digital Communications Frank Kschischang ECE U of T Distinguished Professor of Mechanobiology Craig Simmons MIE, BME

76 Research Title Chairholder Sponsor Tier Dept. U of T Distinguished Professor of Chul Park MIE Microcellular Engineered Plastics U of T Distinguished Professor of Nanobioengineering Warren Chan BME U of T Distinguished Professor of Mark Fox MIE Urban Systems Engineering U of T Distinguished Professor of Computational David Zingg UTIAS Aerodynamics and Sustainable Aviation U of T Distinguished Professor in Forest Ning Yan ChemE Biomaterials Engineering University Professor Michael Collins CivMin University Professor Elizabeth Edwards ChemE University Professor Edward Sargent ECE University Professor Michael Sefton ChemE University Professor Molly Shoichet ChemE, BME University Professor Peter Zandstra BME Velma M. Rogers Graham Chair in Engineering George Eleftheriades Endowed ECE W. M. Keck Chair in Engineering Rock Mechanics John Harrison Endowed CivMin Wallace G. Chalmers Chair of Engineering Design Li Shu Endowed MIE

Research 77

CHAPTER 5 U of T Engineering remains Canada’s top engineering school and among the best in the world. AWARDS & PHOTO: DARIA PEREVEZENTSEV RANKINGS

FACTS & FIGURES #1 16.4% 75 U of T Engineering’s rank U of T Engineering’s share Major national and within Canada across all four of major awards for which international awards TOP 10 organizations that publish Canadian engineering earned by U of T Engineering U of T Engineering’s ranking university rankings specific professors are eligible faculty members over the among North American public to engineering. (2019). Our faculty make up past five years. universities. 5.6% of the Canadian total. Figure 5.1 Summary of University of Toronto Engineering Performance in World Rankings, 2019–2020

North Ranking Organization Release Date Canada American World Public

QS World University Ranking for Engineering and Technology March 2020 1 4 22

QS World University Ranking by Subject March 2020

– Chemical Engineering 1 7 27 – Civil & Structural Engineering 2 7 36 – Computer Sci. & Information Systems 1 2 10 – Electrical & Electronic Engineering 1 4 23 – Materials Science 1 9 48 – Mechanical, Aeronautical & Manuf. Eng. 1 6 32 – Mineral & Mining Engineering 5 8 22

Times Higher Education (THE) – Elsevier World University Ranking for October 2019 1 7 27 Engineering & Technology

Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) for June 2019 Engineering Subjects

– Aerospace Engineering 1 6 17 – Biomedical Engineering 1 4 21 – Chemical Engineering 4 25 142 – Civil Engineering 4 13 38 – Computer Science and Engineering 1 4 12 – Electrical & Electronic Engineering 1 16 41 – Materials Science & Engineering 1 16 66 – Mechanical Engineering 2 18 73 – Mining & Mineral Engineering 3 6 25

National Taiwan University (NTU) Performance Ranking of June 2019 1 8 60 Scientific Papers for World Universities

NTU Performance Ranking by Subject June 2019

– Chemical Engineering 3 17 128 – Civil Engineering 2 7 52 – Computer Science 3 10 59 – Electrical Engineering 2 6 39 – Materials Science 1 13 78 – Mechanical Engineering 1 11 76

Figure 6.7 Summary of University of Toronto Engineering Performance in World Rankings

6.3 - Acad Ranking of World Univ - 2019 - Engineering - by Subject (AR20 5.4) - v1.xlsx / 6.3 May 26, 2020 Geoff Wichert Rankings data are current as of the date indicated in Figure 5.1. Awards data are presented for the 2019 calendar year (January to December). Selected faculty, alumni and staff awards were received between summer 2019 and summer 2020.

80 Awards & Rankings Figure 5.2a QS Top 50 World Universities, 2020

Massachusetts Inst of Tech Stanford U U Cambridge Swiss Fed Inst of Tech (ETH), Zürich U California, Berkeley U Oxford Imperial College London Nanyang Tech U, Singapore Tsinghua U National U Singapore École Polytech Féd, Lausanne Harvard U Georgia Inst of Tech California Inst of Tech Delft U of Tech Korea Adv Inst Sci & Tech (KAIST) Carnegie Mellon U U of Sci & Tech U California, Los Angeles Politecnico di Milano U UU Toronto Toronto 22 Peking U Seoul National U Tech U Munich Shanghai Jiao Tong U U Illinois, -Champaign Tokyo Inst of Tech U Texas, Austin KTH Royal Inst of Tech Princeton U UU British British ColumbiaColumbia 32 Cornell U Purdue U Zhejiang U U Michigan, Ann Arbor U New South Wales, Sydney Kyoto U UCL U Hong Kong UU Waterloo Waterloo 41 National Taiwan U U Melbourne Indian Inst of Tech Bombay Tech U Berlin U Manchester McGillMcGill U 47 Indian Inst of Tech Delhi Politecnico di Torino Fudan U

Figure 6.1a QS World University Rankings, Top 50 Universities for Engineering and Information Technology, 2020

Chapter: Ch.6 - Rankings Excel Filename: 6.1a-c - QS World Ranking 2020 - Engineering (AR20 6.1a-c) - v1.xlsx Sheet: 6.1a Awards & Rankings 81 Date: May 13, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert Figure 5.2b QS Top North American Public Universities, 2020

U California, Berkeley Georgia Inst of Tech U California, Los Angeles UU TorontoToronto 4 U Illinois, Urbana-Champaign U Texas, Austin UU British British ColumbiaColumbia 7 Purdue U U Michigan, Ann Arbor UU WaterlooWaterloo 10 McGillMcGill U 11 U California, San Diego Pennsylvania State U U Washington Texas A&M U U Wisconsin, Madison Virginia Polytech Inst UU MontréalMontréal 18 UU AlbertaAlberta 19 U Maryland, College Park U California, Santa Barbara Ohio State U U California, Davis U Minnesota, Twin Cities Michigan State U Queen'sQueen's U 26 North Carolina State U U Florida McMasterMcMaster U 29 U Massachusetts, Amherst

Figure 5.2c Canadian U15 in QS Top 200, 2020

UU TorontoToronto 22 U British Columbia 32 U FigureWaterloo 6.1b 41 QSMcGill World U University Rankings, Top North47 American Public Universities for U EngineeringMontréal and Information Technology,109 2020 U Alberta 112 Queen's U 161 McMaster U 185 U Calgary Chapter: Ch.6 - Rankings200 Excel Filename: 6.1a-c - QS World Ranking 2020 - Engineering (AR20 6.1a-c) - v1.xlsx Sheet: 6.1b Date: May 13, 2020 FigurePrepared 6.1c by: Geoff Wichert Canadian U15 in Top 200 from QS World University Rankings for Engineering and Information Technology

82 Awards & RankingsChapter: Ch.6 - Rankings Excel Filename: 6.1a-c - QS World Ranking 2020 - Engineering (AR20 6.1a-c) - v1.xlsx Sheet: 6.1c Date: May 13, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert Figure 5.2d Canadian Universities in QS by Subject, 2020

Chemical Engineering Civil & Structural Engineering

UU TorontoToronto 27 U British Columbia 36 U British Columbia 46 UU Toronto Toronto 37 McGill U 46 McGill U 55 U Waterloo 82 U Waterloo 84 U Alberta 90 U Alberta 119 U Montréal 111 U Montréal 141 U Calgary 124 Queen's U 148 McMaster U 135 Western U 163 U Ottawa 166 U Calgary 190 Queen's U 178 Western U 197

Computer Science & Information Systems Electrical & Electronic Engineering

UU Toronto Toronto 10 UU TorontoToronto 23 U Waterloo 24 U British Columbia 38 U British Columbia 25 U Waterloo 53 McGill U 54 McGill U 62 U Montréal 71 U Alberta 131 U Alberta 90 U Montréal 159 Simon Fraser U 139 McMaster U 191 Queen's U 173 Queen's U 199

Materials Sciences Mechanical, Aeronautical & Manufacturing Engineering

UU Toronto Toronto 48 UU Toronto Toronto 32 McGill U 49 McGill U 33 U British Columbia 77 U British Columbia 64 McMaster U 89 U Waterloo 87 U Alberta 110 U Montréal 111 U Waterloo 121 McMaster U 142 U Montréal 131 U Alberta 163

Mineral & Mining Engineering

McGill U 6 Queen's U 8 U British Columbia 9 U Alberta 11 UU TorontoToronto 22 U Laval 35 Western U 50

Awards & Rankings 83 Figure 5.3a THE Top 50 World Universities, 2020

California Inst of Tech Stanford U U Cambridge Harvard U U Oxford Massachusetts Inst of Tech Princeton U ETH Zurich U California, Los Angeles Georgia Inst of Tech Imperial College London National U Singapore Peking U U California, Berkeley Nanyang Tech U, Singapore Carnegie Mellon U U Michigan, Ann Arbor Tsinghua U École Polytech Fédérale de Lausanne Yale U Delft U of Tech U Texas, Austin U Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Hong Kong U of Sci and Tech Tech U Munich Cornell U UU Toronto Toronto 27 U California, Santa Barbara U Sci and Tech of China RWTH Aachen U U Tokyo Korea Adv Inst of Sci and Tech (KAIST) Columbia U U California, San Diego Purdue U, West Lafayette Northwestern U U Pennsylvania Johns Hopkins U Zhejiang U Seoul National U Shanghai Jiao Tong U U Hong Kong UU British British ColumbiaColumbia 43 U Wisconsin, Madison U Southern California UCL McGillMcGill U 47 KU Leuven Duke U U Washington

Figure 6.2a Times Higher Education - Elsevier World University Ranking, Top 50 Universities for Engineering and Information Technology, 2020

Chapter: Ch.6 - Rankings Excel Filename: 6.2a-c - THE-Elsevier - 2020 Engineering Ranking (AR20 5.3a-c) - v1.xlsx Sheet: 6.2a Date: May 20, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert 84 Awards & Rankings U Toronto U British Columbia Figure 5.3b THE Top North American Public Universities, 2020

U California, Los Angeles Georgia Inst of Tech U California, Berkeley U Michigan, Ann Arbor U Texas, Austin U Illinois, Urbana-Champaign UU Toronto Toronto 7 U California, Santa Barbara U California, San Diego Purdue U, West Lafayette UU British British Columbia Columbia 11 U Wisconsin, Madison McGillMcGill U 13 U Washington Ohio State U Texas A&M U Virginia Polytech Inst and State U U California, Davis U Maryland, College Park Arizona State U, Tempe U California, Irvine U Minnesota UU Waterloo Waterloo 23 U Colorado, Boulder U California, Riverside

Figure 5.3c Canadian U15 in THE Top 200, 2020

UU TorontoToronto 27 U British Columbia 43 FigureMcGill 6.2bU 47 UTimes Waterloo Higher Education - Elsevier89 World University Ranking, TopU Alberta North American Public Universities135 for Engineering and Information Technology, 2020

Chapter: Ch.6 - Rankings Excel Filename: 6.2a-c - THE-Elsevier - 2020 Engineering Ranking (AR20 5.3a-c) - v1.xlsx Sheet: 6.2b Date: May 20, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

U Toronto Figure 6.2c U British Columbia Times Higher Education - Elsevier World University Ranking, McGill U Canadian U15 in Top 200 Universities for Engineering and Information Technology,U Waterloo 2020

Chapter: Ch.6 - Rankings Excel Filename: 6.2a-c - THE-Elsevier - 2020 Engineering Ranking (AR20 5.3a-c) - v1.xlsx Sheet: 6.2c Date: May 20, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert Awards & Rankings 85 Figure 5.4 Canadian Universities in the Top 200 of the ARWU by Subject, 2019

Aerospace Engineering Computer Science & Engineering

UU Toronto Toronto 17 UU TorontoToronto 12 McGill U 38 U Waterloo 44 York U 112 U British Columbia 45 U Alberta 71 U Montréal 74 Simon Fraser U 91 Biomedical Engineering McMaster U 110 UU Toronto Toronto 21 McGill U 119 McGill U 67 U Manitoba 163 U British Columbia 77 U Montréal 111 Electrical Engineering U Ottawa 196

UU Toronto Toronto 41 U British Columbia 74 Chemical Engineering U Waterloo 75 Queen's U 104 U Alberta 41 McGill U 108 U Waterloo 70 Western U 143 U Calgary 112 Ryerson U 147 UU TorontoToronto 142 U Manitoba 149 U Ottawa 148 U Victoria 164 U British Columbia 150 U Calgary 175 U Saskatchewan 156 U Québec Western U 158 176 McGill U 171 U Alberta 197 U Regina 183 U Montréal 200

Materials Science & Engineering

Civil & Structural Engineering UU Toronto Toronto 66 U Waterloo 112 Western U 13 McGill U 177 U British Columbia 27 McMaster U 29 UU Toronto Toronto 38 Mechanical Engineering McGill U 58 U Waterloo 64 McGill U 56 U Montréal 83 UU TorontoToronto 73 U Ottawa 85 U British Columbia 96 U Alberta 91 U Alberta 130 Concordia U 101 U Waterloo 133 U Sherbrooke 132 Carleton U 156 Ryerson U 179 Mineral Engineering Queen's U 182 McGill U 9 U Alberta 17 UU TorontoToronto 25 U British Columbia 29 U Laval 72

86 Awards & Rankings Figure 5.5a NTU Top 60 World Universities, 2019

Tsinghua U Nanyang Tech U Harbin Inst of Tech U of Chinese Acad of Sci Zhejiang U Shanghai Jiao Tong U National U Singapore Huazhong U of Sci & Tech Massachusetts Inst of Tech Xian Jiaotong U U of Sci & Tech of China Stanford U Georgia Inst of Tech Tianjin U Peking U South China U of Tech U California, Berkeley Southeast U Beihang U Central South U City U Hong Kong Dalian U of Tech Hong Kong Polytech U Imperial College London U Texas, Austin King Abdulaziz U Northwestern Polytech U Tongji U Harvard U U Cambridge Swiss Fed Inst of Tech, Lausanne Chongqing U Swiss Fed Inst of Tech, Zurich Beijing Inst of Tech Soochow U U of Sci & Tech, Beijing Hunan U U of Elec Sci & Tech of China Wuhan U Seoul National U Nanjing U Fudan U Sichuan U Northwestern U U Michigan, Ann Arbor Korea Adv Inst of Sci & Tech Jilin U U Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Delft U of Tech U New South Wales Wuhan U of Tech U California, Los Angeles Shandong U U Chicago Pennsylvania State U, Univ Park Sun Yat Sen U Hong Kong U of Sci & Tech Northeastern U, China Rice U UU TorontoToronto 60

Figure 6.4a National Taiwan University (NTU) Performance Ranking of Engineering Papers, Top 60 World Universities, 2019

Chapter: Ch.6 - Rankings Excel Filename: 6.4a-d - NTU Acad Papers - 2019 Engineering - incl Subj (AR20 5.5a-d) - v1.xlsx Awards & Rankings 87 Sheet: 6.4a Date: May 22, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert Figure 5.5b NTU Top North American Public Universities, 2019

Georgia Inst of Tech U California, Berkeley U Texas, Austin U Michigan, Ann Arbor U Illinois, Urbana-Champaign U California, Los Angeles Pennsylvania State U, Univ Park UU TorontoToronto 8 Purdue U, West Lafayette Texas A&M U, College Station UU WaterlooWaterloo 11 U Washington, Seattle U Maryland, College Park U California, San Diego North Carolina State U U Tennessee, Knoxville UU British British ColumbiaColumbia 17 U Wisconsin, Madison UU AlbertaAlberta 19 U California, Santa Barbara Ohio State U, Columbus U Minnesota, Twin Cities Arizona State U U Florida Virginia Polytech Inst & State U U Colorado, Boulder U California, Davis U California, Riverside Rutgers U, New Brunswick McGill U 30

Figure 5.5c Canadian U15 Universities in NTU Top 200, 2019

UU TorontoToronto 60 Figure 6.4b U Waterloo 68 NTU Top North American Public Universities for Engineering, 2019 U British Columbia 100 U Alberta 103 McGill U 166 Chapter: Ch.6 - Rankings Excel Filename: 6.4a-d - NTU Acad Papers - 2019 Engineering - incl Subj (AR20 5.5a-d) - v1.xlsx Sheet: 6.4b Date: May 22, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

Figure 6.4c Canadian Universities in NTU Top 200, 2019

Chapter: Ch.6 - Rankings Excel Filename: 6.4a-d - NTU Acad Papers - 2019 Engineering - incl Subj (AR20 5.5a-d) - v1.xlsx Sheet: 6.4c Date: May 22, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

88 Awards & Rankings Figure 5.5d Canadian Universities in NTU by Subject, 2019

Chemical Engineering Civil Engineering

U Waterloo 75 U British Columbia 43 U Alberta 93 UU TorontoToronto 52 UU TorontoToronto 128 U Alberta 69 U British Columbia 133 U Waterloo 73 U Calgary 167 McGill U 105 U Montréal 120 Concordia U 141 U Laval 193

Computer Science Electrical Engineering

U Waterloo 38 U Waterloo 25 U British Columbia 44 UU TorontoToronto 39 UU TorontoToronto 59 U British Columbia 41 U Alberta 64 U Alberta 48 U Montréal 98 Carleton U 132 Carleton U 132 Concordia U 143 Concordia U 137 McGill U 149 Simon Fraser U 160 U Montréal 153 McMaster U 162 Ryerson U 174 McGill U 183 Western U 188

Materials Science Mechanical Engineering

UU TorontoToronto 78 UU TorontoToronto 76 U Waterloo 108 U Alberta 81 U Alberta 173 U British Columbia 94 McGill U 189 U Waterloo 97 McGill U 100 U Montréal 165

Figure 6.4d Canadian Universities in NTU Performance Ranking of Engineering Papers Top 200 By Subject, 2019

Chapter: Ch.6 - Rankings Excel Filename: 6.4a-d - NTU Acad Papers - 2019 Engineering - incl Subj (AR20 5.5a-d) - v1.xlsx Sheet: 6.4d Date: May 22, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

Awards & Rankings 89 Figure 5.6a Number of Engineering Publications Indexed by Thompson Reuters Association of American Universities (AAU) Public and Canadian Peer Institutions, 2014 to 2018

Georgia Inst of Tech 6,715 U Michigan 5,094 U California, Berkeley 4,847 Purdue U 4,814 U Illinois, Urbana-Champaign 4,654 Penn State U 4,526 Texas A&M U, College Station 4,457 U Texas, Austin 3,784 UU WaterlooWaterloo 3,514 UU AlbertaAlberta 3,488 UU TorontoToronto 3,430 U California, San Diego 3,029 U Maryland, College Park 3,017 Ohio State U 2,792 McGillMcGill U 2,773 UU British British ColumbiaColumbia 2,704 U California, Los Angeles 2,670 U Wisconsin, Madison 2,643 U Florida 2,498 U Washington, Seattle 2,288 U Minnesota, Twin Cities 2,272 UU Montréal Montréal 2,258 Iowa State U 2,178 U Colorado, Boulder 2,043 U California, Davis 1,906 Michigan State U 1,728 UU CalgaryCalgary 1,708 U California, Santa Barbara 1,677 McMasterMcMaster U 1,676 Rutgers State U, New Brunswick 1,640 U Pittsburgh 1,440 WesternWestern U 1,421 U California, Irvine 1,364 SUNY, Buffalo 1,311 ULaval Laval U 1,273 U Arizona 1,270 U Virginia 1,207 U ManitobaUU Ottawa 1,161 Queen'sQueens U 1,093 UU Saskatchewan Saskatchewan 950 SUNY, Stony Brook 880 UU ManitobaManitoba 866 U , Columbia 853 DalhousieDalhousie U 780 U North Carolina, Chapel Hill 758 U Kansas 660 U Iowa 580 Indiana U, Bloomington 283 U Oregon 172 U California, San Francisco 168

Figure 6.5a Number of Engineering Publications Indexed by Thomson Reuters Association of American Universities (AAU) Public and Canadian Peer Institutions, 2014 to 2018

Chapter: Ch.6 - Rankings 90 AwardsExcel & Rankings Filename: 6.5+6.6 - Engineering 2014 to 2018 (AR20 6.5+6.6) - v1.xlsx Sheet: 6.5a Date: May 13, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert Figure 5.6b Summary of U15 Bibliometrics for Publications Publications Faculty Count Publications per Faculty on Pub Rank per Faculty U Waterloo 3,514 326 10.8 7

U Alberta 3,488 238 14.6 1

U Toronto 3,430 262 13.1 3

McGill U 2,773 221 12.6 5

U British Columbia 2,704 198 13.7 2

U Montréal 2,258 441 5.1 14

U Calgary 1,708 183 9.3 9

McMaster U 1,676 157 10.7 8

Western U 1,421 110 12.9 4

Laval U 1,273 162 7.9 12

U Ottawa 1,161 132 8.8 11

Queens U 1,093 236 4.6 15

U Saskatchewan 950 88 10.8 6

U Manitoba 866 93 9.3 10

Dalhousie U 780 111 7.0 13

Figure 6.5b Summary of U15 Bibliometrics for Publications

Chapter: Ch.6 - Rankings Excel Filename: 6.5+6.6 - Engineering Bibliometrics 2014 to 2018 (AR20 6.5+6.6) - v1.xlsx Sheet: 6.5b Date: May 13, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

Awards & Rankings 91 Figure 5.6c Number of Engineering Citations Indexed by Thompson Reuters Association of American Universities (AAU) Public and Canadian Peer Institutions, 2014 to 2018

Georgia Inst of Tech 140,739 U California, Berkeley 123,167 U Michigan 88,316 U Texas, Austin 82,264 Penn State U 78,537 U Illinois, Urbana-Champaign 74,619 Purdue U 68,383 U California, Los Angeles 67,986 UU TorontoToronto 67,882 U California, San Diego 56,516 UU WaterlooWaterloo 56,248 U Maryland, College Park 54,939 Texas A&M U, College Station 54,238 U Washington, Seattle 51,621 U Wisconsin, Madison 46,747 UU AlbertaAlberta 43,457 Ohio State U 42,406 U California, Santa Barbara 38,509 UU MontréalMontréal 36,968 McGillMcGill U 36,145 U Florida 34,971 U Minnesota, Twin Cities 34,367 UU British British ColumbiaColumbia 34,100 U Colorado, Boulder 33,191 Michigan State U 27,327 Rutgers State U, New Brunswick 26,777 Iowa State U 26,742 U California, Davis 24,747 U North Carolina, Chapel Hill 24,226 U Pittsburgh 22,340 WesternWestern U 20,739 SUNY, Buffalo 19,411 McMasterMcMaster U 18,658 UU CalgaryCalgary 17,775 U California, Irvine 17,550 U Virginia 14,958 UU OttawaOttawa 14,633 SUNY, Stony Brook 14,162 U Arizona 14,099 ULaval Laval U 13,756 UU Saskatchewan Saskatchewan 13,382 Queen'sQueens U 11,445 U Missouri, Columbia 10,511 DalhousieDalhousie U 10,267 UU Manitoba 9,554 U Kansas 8,349 U Iowa 6,835 Indiana U, Bloomington 3,524 U Oregon 3,392 U California, San Francisco 2,660

Figure 6.6a Number of Engineering Citations Indexed by Thomson Reuters Association of American Universities (AAU) Public and Canadian Peer Institutions, 2014 to 2018

Chapter: Ch.6 - Rankings Excel Filename: 6.5+6.6 - Engineering Bibliometrics 2014 to 2018 (AR20 6.5+6.6) - v1.xlsx Sheet: 6.6a Date: May 13, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

92 Awards & Rankings Figure 5.6d Summary of U15 Bibliometrics for Citations Citations Faculty Count Citations per Faculty Citations on Rank per Faculty per Citations Publication Citations on Rank per Publication U Toronto 67,882 261 259.3 1 19.8 1

U Waterloo 56,248 296 172.8 4 16.0 3

U Alberta 43,457 227 182.3 3 12.5 10

U Montréal 36,968 254 83.8 14 16.4 2

McGill U 36,145 143 163.9 6 13.0 7

U British Columbia 34,100 195 172.7 5 12.6 8

Western U 20,739 108 188.5 2 14.6 4

McMaster U 18,658 156 119.1 8 11.1 11

U Calgary 17,775 159 97.1 11 10.4 15

U Ottawa 14,633 125 110.9 9 12.6 9

Laval U 13,756 162 84.9 13 10.8 13

U Saskatchewan 13,382 87 152.8 7 14.1 5

Queens U 11,445 127 48.4 15 10.5 14

Dalhousie U 10,267 104 92.5 12 13.2 6

U Manitoba 9,554 85 102.5 10 11.0 12

Figure 6.6b Summary of U15 Bibliometrics for Citations

Chapter: Ch.6 - Rankings Excel Filename: 6.5+6.6 - Engineering Bibliometrics 2014 to 2018 (AR20 6.5+6.6) - v1.xlsx Sheet: 6.6b Date: May 13, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

Awards & Rankings 93 Figure 5.7 Summary of Major International, National and Provincial Awards and Honours, 2010 to 2019

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

International

AAAS Fellowships (Engineering Section) 6 5 3 1 4 1

MIT Top 35 Under 35 1 1

National Academy of Inventors 1 1

Royal Academy of Engineering 1 1

Royal Society, U.K. 1

U.S. National Academies* 1 1 1 1 National

Brockhouse Prize 1

Canadian Academy of Engineering 8 1 7 6 3 5 5 5 3 2 Fellowship

Engineering Institute of Canada 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 1 1 3 Fellowship

Engineering Institute of Canada Awards 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1

Engineers Canada Awards 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Governor General's Innovation Award 1 1

Killam Research Fellowship* 2

Killam Prize* 1 1 1

Manning Innovation Award 1

Order of Canada 2 1

Royal Society of Canada Fellowship* 2 4 3 2 2 1 2 2

Royal Society of Canada College of New Scholars, Artists and Scientists 1 1 1 1 1

Steacie Fellowship* 2 1 1 1 1

Steacie Prize* 1 1

Synergy Award for Innovation 1 Provincial

Ontario Professional Engineers Awards 4 5 3 2 2 1 2 3 1 3

OCUFA Teaching Award 1 1 1

Order of Ontario 1 1 1

Total 32 22 26 15 16 16 22 22 12 13

Note 5.7: (*) denotes U of T performance indicator. Data shown are by calendar year (January to December) and include faculty award recipients only.

94 Awards & Rankings Figure 5.8a Number of Major International Awards Received by U of T Engineering Compared to Other Canadian Engineering Faculties, 2019

U Toronto 10

U Alberta 6

U Waterloo 6

Queen's U 4

Simon Fraser U 4

U Calgary 3

U Manitoba 3

McGill U 3

U Victoria 3

Carleton U 2

Dalhousie U 2

U Laval 2

Polytech Montréal 2

Western U 2

York U 2

U British Columbia 1

U 1

Memorial U 1

Ryerson U 1

U Saskatchewan 1

U Sherbrooke 1

U Windsor 1

Figure 5.2a Note 5.8a, b: DataNumber shown are of by Majorcalendar yearAwards (January Received to December) byand Uinclude of T faculty Engineering award recipients Compared only. The following to major awards are included: International — American Association for the Advancement of Science Fellowship (Engineering Section), MIT Top 35 under 35,Other the National Canadian Academy Engineeringof Inventors, the Royal Faculties, Academy of 2019 Engineering and the U.S. National Academies; National — Brockhouse Prize, Canadian Academy of Engineering Fellowship, Engineering Institute of Canada Awards, Engineering Institute of Canada Fellowship, Engineers Canada Awards, Killam Prize (Engineering), Killam Research Fellowship, Order of Canada, Royal Society of Canada Fellowship (Engineering/Physical Sciences), Royal Society of Canada College of New Scholars, Artists and Scientists, Steacie Fellowship, Steacie Prize and SynergyChapter: AwardsCh.5 for Innovation. - Awards and Honours Excel Filename: 5.2+5.3 - UofT Awards cf w U-15 - 1+5yr totals - 2015-19 (AR20 5.2+5.3) - v2.xlsx Path: H:\My Documents\All Reports\Awards + Honours\ Sheet: 5.2a Date: April 30, 2020 Awards & Rankings 95 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert Figure 5.8b Percentage of Engineering Faculty and Total Major Awards Received in Canadian Engineering Faculties, 2019

Percentage of Total Percentage of Total Major Awards Full Time Equivalent Received by Engineering Faculty in Engineering Canada Faculties U Toronto 5.6% 16.4% U Alberta 5.1% 9.8% U Waterloo 6.9% 9.8% Queen's U 5.0% 6.6% Simon Fraser U 0.7% 6.6% U Calgary 3.9% 4.9% U Manitoba 2.0% 4.9% McGill U 4.7% 4.9% U Victoria 1.6% 4.9% Carleton U 3.5% 3.3% Dalhousie U 2.4% 3.3% U Laval 3.4% 3.3% Polytech Montréal 9.4% 3.3% Western U 2.3% 3.3% York U 1.5% 3.3% U British Columbia 4.2% 1.6% U Guelph 1.3% 1.6% Memorial U 2.0% 1.6% Ryerson U 2.7% 1.6% U Saskatchewan 1.9% 1.6% U Sherbrooke 3.0% 1.6% U Windsor 1.9% 1.6%

Figure 5.9 NumberFigure of Awards 5.8b Received by U of T Engineering Faculty Compared to Other Canadian EngineeringPercentages Faculties 2015 of Engineeringto 2019 Faculty and Total Major Awards Received in Canadian Engineering Faculties, 2019 American Association for the Advancement of 85.7% (U of T=6) Science Fellows - Engineering Section (n=7) U.S. National Academies - 50.0% (U of T=1) Foreign Members (n=2)

Chapter: Ch.5 - Awards and Honours Killam PrizeExcel in Engineering Filename: (n=5) 5.2+5.3 - UofT Awards cf40.0% w U-15 (U of T=2)- 1+5yr totals - 2015-19 (AR20 5.2+5.3) - v4.xlsx

Steacie FellowsPath: (n=7) H:\My Documents\All28.6% Reports\Awards (U of T=2) + Honours\ Sheet: 5.8b Royal Society of Canada Fellows - 21.2% (U of T=7) Academy of Science (n=33)Date: June 4, 2020 International Engineering Institute of CanadaPrepared Fellows (n=67) by: Geoff Wichert14.9% (U of T=10) Canadian Canadian Academy of Engineering Fellows (n=138) 14.5% (U of T=20) Provincial

Ontario Professional Engineers Awards (n=23) 43.5% (U of T=10)

Note 5.8b: Faculty counts include all tenured, tenure-stream and teaching-stream faculty. Note 5.9: Data shown are by calendar year (January to December) and include faculty award recipients only.

96 Awards & Rankings Figure 5.3 Number of Awards Received by U of T Engineering Faculty Compared to Other Canadian Engineering Faculties, 2015 to 2019

Chapter: Ch.5 - Awards and Honours Excel Filename: 5.2+5.3 - UofT Awards cf w U-15 - 1+5yr totals - 2015-19 (AR20 5.2+5.3) - v3.xlsx Path: H:\My Documents\All Reports\Awards + Honours\ Sheet: 5.3 Date: May 31, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert Figure 5.10 Selected Awards Received by Faculty and Staff, 2019–2020

Level Organization Award Recipient American Institute of Medical International Fellow Yu Sun (MIE) and Biomedical Engineering International American Society of Mechanical Engineers Fellow Nasser Ashgriz (MIE) International American Society of Mechanical Engineers Fellow Aimy Bazylak (MIE) Institute of Electrical and International Fellow Vaughn Betz (ECE) Electronics Engineers Institute of Electrical and International Fellow Shahrokh Valaee (ECE) Electronics Engineers Institute of Electrical and Distinguished International Electronics Engineers Antennas George Eleftheriades (ECE) Achievement Award and Propagation Society Institute of Electrical and Ronald S. Blicq Award for International Electronics Engineers Professional Distinction in Technical Robert Irish (ISTEP) Communications Society Communication Education Institute of Electrical and Early Academic Career Award International Electronics Engineers Robotics Eric Diller (MIE) in Robotics and Automation and Automation Society International Federation of International Giorgio Quazza Medal Murray Wonham (ECE) Automatic Control International National Academy of Engineering (U.S.) International Member Michael Sefton (ChemE, BME) National Canadian Academy of Engineering Fellow Milos Popovic (BME) National Canadian Academy of Engineering Fellow David Sinton (MIE) National Canada Council for the Arts Killam Prize in Engineering Ted Sargent (ECE) National Canada Council for the Arts Killam Research Fellowship Milica Radisic (BME, ChemE) National Canadian Society for Chemical Engineering R.S. Jane Memorial Award Levente Diosady (ChemE) National Canadian Society for Civil Engineering A.B. Sanderson Award Jeffrey Packer (CivMin) National Canadian Society for Civil Engineering Fellow Paul Gauvreau (CivMin) National Canadian Society for Civil Engineering Award Amer Shalaby (CivMin) Canadian Society for National Fellow Xinyu Liu (MIE) Mechanical Engineering National Engineers Canada Gold Medal Award Cristina Amon (MIE) National Engineering Institute of Canada Fellow Michael Carter (MIE) National Engineering Institute of Canada Fellow Nazir Kherani (ECE, MSE) National Engineering Institute of Canada Fellow Douglas Reeve (ChemE) National Engineering Institute of Canada Fellow Craig Simmons (MIE, BME) National Royal Society of Canada Fellow Zheng-Hong Lu (MSE) National Royal Society of Canada Fellow Yu Sun (MIE) Canada’s Most Powerful National Women’s Executive Network Cristina Amon (MIE) Women — Top 100 Regional Ontario Professional Engineers Awards Engineering Excellence Medal Goldie Nejat (MIE) Joan E. Foley Quality of U of T U of T Jason Bazylak (MIE) Student Experience Award U of T U of T McLean Award Natalie Enright Jerger (ECE) U of T U of T President’s Impact Award Tom Chau (BME) U of T U of T President’s Teaching Award Micah Stickel (ECE) Faculty U of T U of T Cristina Amon (MIE) Citizenship Award

Awards & Rankings 97 Figure 5.11a U of T Engineering Staff and Faculty Awards, 2019–2020

Type Award Recipient Administrative Staff Awards Harpreet Dhariwal Emerging Leader Award Nini Chen (ECE) Barbara McCann Quality of Student Administrative Staff Awards Shayni Curtis-Clarke (CivMin) Experience Award for Frontline Staff Quality of Student Experience Award Administrative Staff Awards David Duong (Office of the Dean) for Behind the Scenes Staff Administrative Staff Awards Agnes Kaneko Citizenship Award Karen Irving (ECE) Administrative Staff Awards Innovation Award Afshin Poraria (ECE) Catherine Gagne Sustained Administrative Staff Awards Jaro Pristupa (ECE) Excellence in Leadership Award McCharles Prize for Early Career Research Awards Gisele Azimi (ChemE, MSE) Research Distinction McCharles Prize for Early Career Research Awards Eric Diller (MIE) Research Distinction Research Awards Safwat Zaky Research Leader Award Eric Miller (CivMin) Research Awards Safwat Zaky Research Leader Award Farid Najm (ECE) Teaching Awards Early Career Teaching Award Amy Bilton (MIE) Teaching Awards Early Career Teaching Award Elodie Passeport (CivMin, ChemE) Teaching Awards Faculty Teaching Award Timothy Chan (MIE) Teaching Awards Sustained Excellence in Teaching Award Mark Kortschot (ChemE)

Figure 5.11b Engineering Alumni Network Awards, 2019

Award Recipient Engineering Alumni Medal Levente Diosady (ChemE 6T6, MASc 6T8, PhD 7T2) Engineering Alumni Hall of Distinction Award Deborah Goodings (CivE 7T5) Engineering Alumni Hall of Distinction Award John A. MacDonald (ElecE 7T9) Engineering Alumni Hall of Distinction Award Shawn Qu (MSE PhD 9T5) Engineering Alumni Hall of Distinction Award Bob Simmonds (EngSci 7T5) Engineering Alumni Hall of Distinction Award Jeanette Southwood (ChemE 8T6, MASc 8T8) 2T5 Mid-Career Achievement Award (EngSci 0T4) 7T6 Early Career Award Holly Johnson (MechE 1T0) James Courtney (EngSci 6T6, Physics MSc. Malcolm F. McGrath Alumni Achievement Award 1967, Physics PhD 1971, MBA 1985) Honourary Member of the EAN Laura C. Fujino L.E. (Ted) Jones Award of Distinction Robert Bazzocchi (EngSci 1T9) L.E. (Ted) Jones Award of Distinction Emma Sexton (IndE 1T9)

98 Awards & Rankings This rendering shows the vision for CHAPTER 6 the Sustainability Lab, a new facility to be constructed on the roof of the Wallberg building. IMAGE COURTESY BAIRD SAMPSON ADVANCEMENT & NEUERT ARCHITECTS COMMUNICATIONS

FACTS & FIGURES 98.6 M 200,673 31,189 Total impressions generated Unique visitors to the Total followers across by media stories mentioning U of T Engineering News @uoftengineering , $17.6 M U of T Engineering in website in 2019–2020. Instagram, Twitter and 2019–2020. LinkedIn accounts. Total philanthropic support generated in 2019–2020. Figure 6.1a Philanthropic Support, 2019–2020

0.7% 1.4% 10.6% 4.1%

50.6%

Total: $17,552,117 Annual Fund (up to $999) Skule Society ($1,000 to $25,000)

32.6% Major Gifts (above $25,000)

Research Support

Realized Planned Gifts

Other Gifts (including in-kind)

Figure 6.1 Advancement Results, 2019–2020 Figure 6.1b Philanthropic Support, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

Chapter: Ch.6 - Advancement and Communications Excel Filename: 6.1a-c - Advancement$34.9M Figures - 2019-20 (AR20 6.1a-c) - v2.xlsx Sheet: 6.1 $7.0M Date: May$29.3M 31, 2020 $29.3M $26.5M Prepared by: Geoff$8.7M Wichert $6.2M $27.9M $6.5M $22.1M $21.6M $23.0M $17.4M $7.3M $7.7M $17.6M $20.7M $20.1M $1.4M $5.7M $16.0M $12.0M Total: $17,552,117 $14.7M $13.9M $3.0M $11.8M $7.0M $1.3MLegend Labels:$9.0M Research Support $5.7M Annual Fund (up to $999) Other Gifts 2010–11Skule 2011–12Society ($1,000 2012–13 to $25,000) 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20 Major Gifts (above $25,000) Research Support ### Realized Planned Gifts Other Gifts (including in-kind) Total Figure 6.2 Philanthropic Support, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

Data in this chapterChapter: are presentedCh.6 by - fiscalAdvancement year, May 1, and 2019 Communications to April 30, 2020. Excel Filename: 6.1a-c - Advancement Figures - 2019-20 (AR20 6.1a-c) - v2.xlsx Sheet: 6.2 Date: May 31, 2020 100 Advancement & Communications Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

Chart Labels: Research Support Other Gifts Figure 6.1c Gift Designations, 2019–2020

32.6% 20.4%

Total: $17,552,117 11.1% Student Experience & Awards (e.g. scholarships)

Faculty Support

0.7% Programs and Research

Infrastructure Support (e.g. new construction, retrofits)

Research Grants 35.1%

Figure 6.1d Engagement on U of T Engineering CONNECT, 2019–2020 Figure 6.3 Gift Designations, 2019–2020

Chapter: Ch.6 - Advancement and Communications CategoryExcel Filename: 6.1a-c - Advancement FiguresMembers - 2019-20 (AR20 Proportion6.1a-c) - v2.xlsxof Alumni Alumni members Sheet: 6.3 7,348 100% Alumni members agedDate: 35 andMay younger 31, 2020 5,143 70.0% Alumni in seniorPrepared leadership by: positionsGeoff Wichert 1,694 23.0% Alumni who have indicated they are 5,634 76.7% willing to help mentor current students

Total: $17,552,117

Legend Labels:

Student Experience & Awards (e.g. scholarsh 20.4% Faculty Support 11.1% Programs and Research 35.1% Infrastructure Support (e.g. new construction 0.7% Research Grants 32.6%

Note 6.1d: Data are as of April 30, 2020. The total CONNECT membership of 9,948 includes 2,600 students, staff and faculty.

Advancement & Communications 101 Figure 6.2a U of T Engineering Media Stories and Impressions, May 2019 to April 2020

• National air quality study by • NYT op-ed on "smart cities" by Greg Evans Shoshanna Saxe • Shoshanna Saxe comments • Top-performing students from on transit in Ontario Toronto headed to U of T Engineering 16,000 COVID-19 content 14,000

12,000

10,000

8,000

6,000

4,000

2,000

0

400

300

200

100

0 May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr

Stories Impressions

Figure 6.2a U of T Engineering Media Stories and Impressions, May 2019 to April 2020

Chapter: Ch.6 - Advancement & Communications Excel Filename: 6.2a - Media stories+impressions - May'19-Apr'20 (AR20 6.2a) - v2.xlsx Sheet: 6.2a Date: June 17, 2020 Prepared by: Geo Wichert

102 Advancement & Communications 10.1% 8.1%

3.3% 7.7%

Figure 6.2b Proportion of U of T Engineering Impressions by Academic19.2% Area, 2019–2020 14.2%

10.1% 8.1% 2.9% 3.3% 7.7% 15.4%

19.3%

19.2% 14.2%

UTIAS EngSci BME MIE 2.9% ChemE MSE 15.4% CivMin No Department Mentioned

ECE 19.3% 1.8% 3.0% 1.2%

UTIAS EngSci Figure 6.2b 18.1% BME MIE Proportion of U of T Engineering Impressions by Academic Area, 2019–2020 35.9% ChemE MSE CivMin No Department Mentioned

FigureECE 6.2c Proportion of U of T Engineering Impressions by Strategic Priority Area, 2019–2020 Chapter: Ch.6 - Advancement & Communications Excel Filename: 6.2b+c - Media reporting by dept+subj - 2019-20 (AR20 6.2b+c) - v2.xlsx 1.8% 18.5% 3.0%Figure1.2% 6.2b Sheet: 6.2b Proportion of U of T Engineering Impressions by AcademicDate: JuneArea, 8, 2020 2019–2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert 18.1% 21.5% 35.9% Chart Labels: UTIAS Chapter: Ch.6 - Advancement & CommunicationsSustainability IBBME Excel Filename: 6.2b+c - Media reporting by dept+subj - 2019-20 (AR20 6.2b+c) - v2.xlsx Bioengineering & Health ChemE Sheet: 6.2b Data Analytics & Robotics Date: June 8, 2020 CivMin 18.5% Engineering Education Prepared by: Geoff Wichert ECE EntrepreneurshipEngSci Advanced Manufacturing Chart Labels: MIE UTIAS 21.5% Other MSE IBBME No Department Mentioned ChemE Note Sustainability6.2b: MediaCivMin impressions are a measure of impact reflecting the number of peopleFigure who may6.2c have read, viewed or consumed a piece of content based on audience data for the outlet. One media story can reference multiple academic areas. In those cases, the impressions BioengineeringECE & Health Proportion of U of T Engineering Impressions by Strategic Priority Area, are included in the counts for both areas. 2019–2020 Note Data6.2c: Analytics One mediaEngSci & Robotics story can reference multiple strategic priority areas. In those cases, the impressions are included in the counts for bothEngineering areas. EducationMIE EntrepreneurshipMSE No Department Mentioned Chapter: Ch.6 - Advancement & Communications Advanced Manufacturing Excel Filename: 6.2b+c - Media reporting by dept+subj - 2019-20 (AR20 6.2b+c) - v2.xlsx Other AdvancementSheet: & Communications6.2c 103 Date: June 8, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert Figure 6.2c Proportion of U of T Engineering Impressions by Strategic Priority Area, 2019–2020 Chart Titles

Sustainability Chapter: Ch.6 - Advancement & Communications Bioengineering & Health Excel Filename: 6.2b+c - Media reporting by dept+subj - 2019-20 (AR20 6.2b+c) - v2.xlsx Data Analytics & Robotics Sheet: 6.2c Engineering Education Date: June 8, 2020 Entrepreneurship Prepared by: Geoff Wichert Advanced Manufacturing Other

Chart Titles

Sustainability Bioengineering & Health Data Analytics & Robotics Engineering Education Entrepreneurship Advanced Manufacturing Other 1.0% 1.3% 2.6% 2.0%

Figure 6.2d Proportion of U of T Engineering Media Stories by13.0% Outlet Location, 2019–2020

1.0% 1.3% 2.6% 2.0%

13.0%

80.1%

Canada Australia India 80.1% United Kingdom Other

Figure 6.3a Twitter Statistics: Tweets, Mentions, Retweets, Likes, May 2019 to April 2020 Canada Australia India Figure 6.2d United States United Kingdom Other Proportion of U of T Engineering Media Stories by Outlet Location, 900 2019–2020 800

700

600

500 Figure 6.2d Chapter: Ch.6 - Advancement & Communications Proportion of U of T Engineering Media Stories Excelby Outlet Filename: Location,6.2d - Media stats by region - 2019-20 (AR20 8.1a) - v1.xlsx 400 2019–2020 Sheet: 6.2d 300 Date: June 8, 2020 200 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert 100

0 Chapter: Ch.6 - Advancement & Communications • Back to Skule™Excel Filename: •6.2d Fall Convocation - Media stats •by Black region History - 2019-20 (AR20• COVID-19 8.1a) content - v1.xlsx Month campaign 80 • Launch of @UofTEngDeanSheet: •6.2d December 6 Chart Labels: account Date: Junememorial 8, 2020 event Canada Geoff Wichert 60 Prepared by: United States Australia

40 United Kingdom India

20 Chart Labels: Other Canada Total 0 United States May JuneAustralia July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr United Kingdom

India Tweets Mentions Retweets Likes Other Total Note 6.2d: The impressions for one story may be included in the counts of multiple countries. Notes 6.3a, b, c: Includes U of T Engineering accounts managed by Engineering Strategic Communications (@uoftengineering). In addition to these, many departments, divisions and institutes maintain their own accounts; this data is not reflected here. Figure 6.3a Twitter Statistics: Tweets, Mentions, Retweets, Likes from 104 Advancement & Communications May 1, 2019 to April 30, 2020

Chapter: Ch.6 - Advancement & Communications Excel Filename: 6.3a - Twitter Stats - May'19-Apr'20 (AR20 6.3a) - v1.xlsx Sheet: 6.3a Date: June 8, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

Tweets Mentions Retweets Likes Figure 6.3b Facebook Statistics: Posts, Comments, Shares, Reactions, May 2019 to April 2020

Spring Convocation 3,000 (incl. Grads to Watch)

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

0

220 Back to Skule™ 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr

Posts Comments Shares Reactions

Figure 6.3b Facebook Statistics: Posts, Comments, Shares, Reactions from May 1, 2019 to April 30, 2020

Chapter: Ch.6 - Advancement & Communications Excel Filename: 6.3b - Facebook Stats - May'19-Apr'20 (AR20 6.3b) - v1.xlsx Sheet: 6.3b Date: June 8, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

Advancement & Communications 105 Figure 6.3c Instagram Statistics: Posts, Comments, Likes, May 2019 to April 2020

5,000 Black History Month campaign Spring Flight PS752 Convocation memorials COVID-19 4,000 content

3,000

2,000

1,000

0 80

60

40

20

0 May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr

Posts Comments Likes

Figure 6.4 Summary of AnalyticsFigure for U6.3c of T Engineering Faculty Site and U of T EngineeringInstagram News Site, Statistics: 2019–2020 Posts, Comments, Likes from May 1, 2019 to April 30, 2020

Faculty site U of T Engineering News site Chapter:(engineering.utoronto.ca)Ch.6 - Advancement(news.engineering.utoronto.ca) & Communications Pageviews Excel Filename: 6.3c - Instagram390,196 Stats - May'19-Apr'20 309,113(AR20 6.3c) - v1.xlsx Unique visitors Sheet: 6.3c 168,976 200,673 Average number of 1.46 1.25 pageviews per session Date: June 8, 2020 Average amount of time spent onPrepared site by: Geoff Wichert1:33 min 0:37 min Cities of origin 5,578 10,109 Countries of origin 201 209

Note 6.4: A session is the period of time a user was actively engaged with our website. All usage data (pageviews, events, etc.) are associated with a session.

106 Advancement & Communications Figure 6.5 Social Media Referrals for U of T Engineering News, 2019–2020

Social Media Platform Unique Users Sessions Facebook 22,395 28,258 Twitter 4,543 6,514 LinkedIn 3,440 3,970 Instagram 728 783

Figure 6.6 Summary of Analytics for Discover Engineering, You Belong Here and Graduate Studies Sites, 2019–2020

Discover Engineering You Belong Here Graduate Studies (discover.engineering. (news.engineering. (gradstudies.engineering. utoronto.ca) utoronto.ca) utoronto.ca) Pageviews 1,047,798 29,569 240,726 Unique visitors 308,507 5,927 67,952 Average number of 2.24 2.70 2.13 pageviews per session Average amount of time spent on site 2:09 min 2:31 min 2:15 min Cities of origin 7,453 695 3,035 Countries of origin 216 92 178

Note 6.5: U of T Engineering’s LinkedIn account launched in January 2020. Note 6.6: A session is the period of time a user was actively engaged with our website. All usage data (pageviews, events, etc.) are associated with a session. Discover Engineering is for prospective students and You Belong Here is for applicants who were admitted to U of T Engineering for undergraduate studies. The Graduate Studies site serves both prospective and current graduate students.

Advancement & Communications 107 Figure 6.7 Top Stories on the Engineering News and U of T News Websites, 2019–2020

Pageviews (U of T Pageviews Engineering (U of T Page Title Date Posted News) News) Total FLATTEN: Engineering students create free online March 25, 2020 23,845 37,704 61,549 map to help track the spread of COVID-19 Out of thin air: New electrochemical process shortens May 29, 2019 56,133 752 56,885 the path to capturing and recycling CO2 Air filtration and COVID-19: Indoor air quality expert March 20, 2020 14,405 -- 14,405 explains how to keep you and your building safe Remembering Mojtaba Abbasnezhad January 10, 2020 2,669 7,637 10,306 How does COVID-19 invade our bodies so easily? U of T April 8, 2020 3,477 3,761 7,238 Engineering team uses ‘organ-on-a-chip’ model to find out This ultra-thin hot water bottle could help ease menstrual pain August 1, 2019 1,761 4,217 5,978 Grads to Watch 2019 June 5, 2019 3,207 2,234 5,441 Can ultraviolet light help hospitals disinfect their supply of April 6, 2020 300 5,061 5,361 masks and gowns? U of T Engineering UV expert explains As COVID-19 protective supplies dwindle, U of T Engineering April 3, 2020 3,018 2,074 5,092 grad students are stitching face masks for Toronto Black History Month: Reflections from U of T Engineering January 31, 2020 1,809 2,804 4,613 Handheld 3D skin printer demonstrates February 4, 2020 2,514 1,345 3,859 accelerated healing of large, severe burns COVID-19 and the ‘what if machine’: How simulations March 19, 2020 2,857 593 3,450 and models help predict pandemic spread Won’t crack under pressure: stress test reveals graphene January 28, 2020 112 3,009 3,121 can withstand more than one billion cycles before breaking Engineering Holiday Gift Guide December 11, 2019 1,455 1,527 2,982 Can self-driving cars handle a Canadian February 3, 2020 1,465 1,505 2,970 winter? We’re about to find out From Malaysia to Toronto: Meet your incoming class of 2T3 August 29, 2020 1,288 1,413 2,701 Oil-adsorbing sponge could prevent December 16, 2019 463 2,166 2,629 environmental contamination We Remember: U of T Engineering community , 2020 1,457 1,026 2,483 reflects on the legacy of December 6 Four startups to watch from Hatchery Demo Day 2019 September 6, 2019 1,226 1,163 2,389 U of T Engineering team programs single- board computers to remotely monitor COVID-19 April 16, 2020 1,018 1,208 2,226 patients and protect health care workers Fourteen engineering professors and staff members April 22, 2020 2,132 -- 2,132 honoured for excellence by the Faculty National air pollution report calls out rush-hour traffic, October 30, 2019 984 1,003 1,987 diesel truck emissions as major areas of concern Meet Marisa Sterling, U of T Engineering’s first Assistant Dean July 10, 2020 1,877 -- 1,877 and Director of Diversity, Inclusion and Professionalism U of T Engineering and Caltech collaborate November 20, 2019 1,257 319 1,576 on pathway to carbon-neutral plastics Researchers develop method to improve January 17, 2020 220 1,231 1,451 transplantation of artificial -producing cells

108 Advancement & Communications CHAPTER 7 From left, Dean Emerita Cristina Amon, Professor Emeritus Ron Venter and Dean Chris Yip open the revitalized entrance of the FINANCIAL Galbraith Building in October 2019. The transformed space serves as a welcoming public area with improved accessibility. & PHYSICAL PHOTO: ROBERTA BAKER RESOURCES

FACTS & FIGURES 18 $112.3 M 89 Buildings wholly or Net revenue, 2019–2020. Laboratory facilities across partly occupied by U of T U of T Engineering upgraded $234.1 M Engineering, from the historic through the Lab Innovation for Sandford Fleming building to Toronto (LIFT) project. Total revenue, 2019–2020. the innovative Myhal Centre. Figure 7.1 Total Revenue, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

$238.0M $234.0M $234.1M $222.8M $28.2M $28.7M $29.7M $210.1M $24.5M $197.6M $23.8M $209.8M $205.3M $204.4M $183.8M $22.8M $198.2M

$170.3M $21.7M $186.3M $159.1M $174.8M $20.7M $145.0M $20.5M $162.0M $149.6M $20.0M $138.6M

$125.0M

2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20

Unrestricted Revenue Restricted Revenue

Figure 7.2 Total Central Costs, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 Figure 11.1 Total Revenue, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 $110.6M $110.8M $105.6M $15.7M $99.1M $15.5M Chapter: Ch.11$94.0M - Financial &$14.7M Physical Resources Excel Filename:$89.9M11.1-6 - Finances$13.8M - FY20 (AR20 11.1-6) - v2.xlsx $84.8M $13.5M $19.8M $19.3M $82.0M Sheet:$13.1M11.1 $20.5M $75.5M $12.5M $19.8M $12.0M Date: April 22, 2020 $69.8M $18.0M $10.9M Prepared by:$17.4MGeoff Wichert $75.2M $75.8M $16.2M $10.3M $15.0M $70.4M $13.9M $65.6M $62.5M $12.5M $59.4M $55.0M $56.1M $50.8M $47.0M

Restricted Revenue Unrestricted Revenue

2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20

University-Wide Costs University Fund Contributions Student Aid Levy

Data in this chapter are presented by fiscal year (May to April)

110 Financial & Physical Resources Figure 11.2 Total Central Costs, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

Chapter: Ch.11 - Financial & Physical Resources Excel Filename: 11.1-6 - Finances - FY20 (AR20 11.1-6) - v2.xlsx Sheet: 11.2 Date: April 22, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

NOTE: In some instances the rounding will not work in this figure, but it cannot be adjusted, as we usually do, because the actual numbers are shown in full in the adjacent Fig 11.3

Chart Labels: Student Aid Levy University Fund Contributions University-Wide Costs Figure 7.3 Budget Data, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20

Unrestricted Revenue $124,966,518 $138,597,605 $149,615,656 $162,048,175 $174,819,446 $186,298,686 $198,246,669 $205,332,615 $209,797,947 $204,361,688

Restricted Revenue $20,009,763 $20,483,566 $20,726,973 $21,737,177 $22,751,425 $23,766,755 $24,525,299 $28,686,839 $28,225,383 $29,712,446

Total Revenue $144,976,282 $159,081,170 $170,342,629 $183,785,352 $197,570,871 $210,065,441 $222,771,967 $234,019,454 $238,023,330 $234,074,134

Divisional Recovery for $6,042,335 $5,084,764 $5,028,443 $11,067,206 $10,910,265 Interdivisional Teaching

University-Wide Costs $47,027,056 $50,817,454 $55,028,273 $56,089,556 $59,390,462 $62,461,112 $65,553,462 $70,384,637 $75,233,388 $75,822,728

University Fund $12,496,652 $13,859,760 $14,961,566 $16,167,220 $17,443,377 $17,985,353 $19,787,234 $20,496,107 $19,836,969 $19,309,067 Contributions

Student Aid Levy $10,313,864 $10,859,371 $11,995,084 $12,539,417 $13,093,888 $13,541,938 $13,793,571 $14,716,594 $15,542,692 $15,703,617

Total Central Costs $69,837,572 $75,536,585 $81,984,923 $84,796,193 $89,927,727 $93,988,403 $99,134,267 $105,597,337 $110,613,049 $110,835,412

Net Revenue $75,138,710 $83,544,584 $88,357,706 $98,989,159 $107,643,144 $110,034,703 $118,552,936 $123,393,674 $116,343,075 $112,328,457

Figure 7.4 Revenue Sources, 2019–2020 Figure 11.3 Budget Data, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

$14.9M $4.3M $3.0M Chapter: Ch.11 - Financial & Physical Resources $7.6M Excel Filename: 11.1-6 - Finances - FY20 (AR20 11.1-6) - v2.xlsx $9.4M Sheet: 11.3 Date: April 22, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert Undergraduate Student Tuition and Provincial Grants

Graduate Student Tuition and Provincial Grants Total: $234.1M Short-Term Investments

Scholarships and Student Aid Funds

Endowed Chairs Expendable Earnings

Canada Research Chairs

Research Grants and Contract Overhead

$57.7M $137.3M

Figure 11.4 Revenue Sources, 2019–2020

Chapter: Ch.11 - Financial & Physical Resources Excel Filename: 11.1-6 - Finances - FY20 (AR20 11.1-6) - v2.xlsx Sheet: 11.4 Date: April 22, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

Financial & Physical Resources 111 Total: $234.1M

Legend Labels:

Undergraduate Student Tuition and Provincial Grants Graduate Student Tuition and Provincial Grants Short-Term Investments Scholarships and Student Aid Funds Endowed Chairs Expendable Earnings Canada Research Chairs Research Grants and Contract Overhead Figure 7.5 Revenue Distribution, 2019–2020

$15.7M

$19.3M

Total: $234.1M Net Revenue

Divisional Recovery for $75.8M Interdivisional Teaching

University-Wide Costs

University Fund

Student Aid Levy $10.9M $112.3M

Figure 7.6 TotalFigure Operating 11.5 RevenueBudget: Breakdown Distribution, by Expenses 2019–2020 (Net of Central University Costs), 2019–2020

$17.7M $55.0M $17.7M Chapter: Ch.11 - Financial & Physical Resources$55.0M Excel Filename: 11.1-6 - Finances - FY20 (AR20 11.1-6) - v2.xlsx Sheet: 11.5 Date: April 22, 2020 $12.5M Prepared by: Geoff Wichert $12.5M Academic Salaries Academic Salaries $3.5M $3.5M Administrative Salaries Administrative Salaries Total: $234.1M Total: $145.3M Total: $145.3M Teaching Assistant Wages Teaching Assistant Wages $20.1MLegend Labels: Employee Benefits $20.1M Employee Benefits Commitments to Departments Net Revenue Commitments to Departments Student Support Divisional Recovery for Interdivisional Teaching Student Support University-Wide Costs Operating University Fund Contribution for Redistribution Operating $10.1MStudent Aid Levy $26.4M $10.1M $26.4M

Figure 7.6 Total Net Operating Budget: Breakdown by Expense, 2019–2020 Figure 7.6 Total Net Operating Budget: Breakdown by Expense, 2019–2020 (net of central university costs) 112 Financial & Physical Resources(net of central university costs)

Chapter: Ch.11 - Financial & Physical Resources Chapter: Ch.11 - Financial & Physical Resources Excel Filename: 11.1-6 - Finances - FY20 (AR20 7.1-6) - v3.xlsx Excel Filename: 11.1-6 - Finances - FY20 (AR20 7.1-6) - v3.xlsx Sheet: 7.6 Sheet: 7.6 Date: May 30, 2020 Date: May 30, 2020 Prepared by: Geoff Wichert Prepared by: Geoff Wichert

Total: $145.3M Total: $145.3M Legend Labels: Legend Labels: Academic Salaries Academic Salaries Administrative Salaries Administrative Salaries Teaching Assistant Wages Teaching Assistant Wages Employee Benefits Employee Benefits Commitments to Departments Commitments to Departments Student Support Student Support Operating Operating Figure 7.7 Summary of Buildings Occupied by Engineering, 2019–2020

Office of the CivE Total Code Building Dean EngSci UTIAS ChemE & MinE ECE BME MIE MSE NASMs Aerospace AS 5,293 5,293 (Downsview) BA Bahen Centre 1,619 561 67 5,780 1,417 9,445

DC Donnelly CCBR 667 889 1,556

ES Earth Sciences 164 164

EA Engineering Annex 221 936 91 1,248

EL Electrometal 149 149

FI 332 332

GB Galbraith 1,560 5,312 4,318 11,190

HA Haultain 198 110 646 721 1,675

MaRS West Tower 136 791 183 1,110

MB Lassonde Mining 1,138 1,362 1,890 832 5,222 Mechanical MC 63 5,380 5,442 Engineering MY Myhal Centre 4,860 4,860

PT D.L. Pratt 1,327 1,488 2,815

RS Rosebrugh 799 2,096 2,895

SF Sandford Fleming 766 692 1,559 3,546 6,563

WB Wallberg 375 8,264 130 1,381 10,151

RM 256 McCaul 528 528

Total Area 10,324 561 5,985 9,361 8,118 16,174 3,841 11,613 4,662 70,638

70,638 NASMs (Net Assignable Square Metre)

Figure 7.8 Selected Infrastructure Investments, 2019–2020

Projects Description Progress Located on the roof of the Wallberg building, Sustainability Research S-Lab features a 550 square metre rooftop solar Design development is nearing completion Laboratory (S-Lab) Figurearray and 7.7 advanced environmental sensors. Summary of Buildings and Areas Occupied by the This new facility will house up to 96 people Gull Lake Survey Construction has started and will be Facultyand includes of Applied a washroom Science & shower and facility, Engineering, 2019–2020 Camp Bunkhouse ready for use in the summer of 2021. , and new septic system. This joint collaborative career centre includes The project is expected to be 203 newChapter: officesCh.7 for the - FinancialEngineering & Physical Career Centre’sResources complete and available for student Excel WorkingProfessional file: - Experience FASE Space Year Inventory Co-op Program. - working - 200530.xlsxcareer services in early 2022. Sheet: 7.7 Construction is underway on alterations to existing Toronto Nanofabrication C-CRAFTDate: isMay a collaborative 30, 2020 project between Centre facilities (Bahen Centre & Canadian Centre PreparedU of T Engineering, by: Geoff Wichert the Faculty of Arts & Science, Pratt Building) including facilities for for Research and the Faculty of Medicine, the Leslie Dan Faculty photolithography, scale-up fabrication and Applications in Fluidic of Pharmacy, and the National Research Council. polymer processing. Design is nearing Technologies (C-CRAFT) It includes facilities for photolithography, scale- completion on a new Containment Level up fabrication and polymer processing. (CL) 2 bio-safety facility to be located in the Mechanical Engineering Building.

Financial & Physical Resources 113 Figure 7.9 The Engineering Neighbourhood

MY

BA Bahen Centre for Information Technology MC Mechanical Engineering Building

DC Donnelly Centre for Cellular and MY Myhal Centre for Engineering Biomolecular Research (CCBR) Innovation & Entrepreneurship

EA Engineering Annex / Electro-Metallurgy Lab PT D.L. Pratt Building Building (South Side) RS Rosebrugh Building

EL Electrometallurgy Lab SF Sandford Fleming Building

ES Earth Sciences Centre WB Wallberg Building

FI Fields Institute – 256 McCaul Street [not pictured]

GB Galbraith Building – MaRS Discover District West Tower [not pictured]

HA Haultain Building – UTIAS (Downsview) [not pictured]

MB Lassonde Mining Building

114 Financial & Physical Resources APPENDIX DATA SOURCES This section indicates the sources for data and information presented throughout this report. Sources are organized in order of appearance by figure number and title.

Introduction

Faculty Leadership, Information provided by the Chief Administrative Officer, Faculty of Applied Science & 2019–2020 Engineering. A current organizational chart is also available online at www.engineering.utoronto.ca/about/office-of-the-dean/#academiclead

Comparison of U of T Enrolment, degrees granted and faculty data are based on the 2018 calendar year Engineering with Ontario and come from the National Council of Deans of Engineering and Applied Science and Canada, 2018–2019 (NCDEAS) 2018 Resources Report, prepared by Engineers Canada and circulated to Canadian engineering deans in July 2019. An updated version of this report was not yet available at the time this Report went to print. Undergraduate enrolment figures exclude non-degree students and those doing a Professional Experience Year Co-op (PEY Co-op). Full-time equivalent (FTE) enrolment statistics represent averages that take into account all three terms of the year (winter, summer and fall). Undergraduate FTE shows the three-term total divided by two; Grad- uate FTE shows the three-term total divided by three. Research funding data comes from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) search engine (www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca/ase-oro/index_eng.asp) with the following parameters: Selec- tion Committees = Discovery Grants + Research Partnerships (excl CRCs & NCEs); Research Subjects = all engineering-related categories; Universities only; Fiscal Year = 2018–2019 (April to March). Major awards data comes from the Director, Awards and Honours, Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering, based on press releases and websites of individual awards for the 2019 calendar year (April to March).

Comparison of U of T All student enrolment statistics are based on headcount for Fall 2019 from the Engineering with St. George U of T Enrolment Reporting Cube (St. George and U of T statistics do not include Campus and University of Toronto School of Theology). All degrees awarded statistics come from ROSI and reflect September 2019 to June 2020 dates (St. George and U of T statistics do not Toronto, 2019–2020 include Toronto School of Theology). All sponsored-research funding statistics come from the U of T Research Reporting Cube, based on the 2018–2019 grant year, and exclude partner hospitals; includes all program types; data is current as of May 2020. Engineering academic staff statistics provided by the Chief Administrative Officer, Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering (based on HRIS and published lists of faculty members). Engineering administrative and technical staff statistics provided by the Manager, Finance and Budget, Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering. U of T academic and administrative staff statistics come from U of T Facts and Figures 2019, available online at: data.utoronto.ca/reports/facts-and-figures. All budget data is provided by the Chief Financial Officer, Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering, and is taken from the U of T Budget Report 2019–20 (Feb 2019), Appendix B, Schedule 4: Revenue and Expense Allocations by Division 2019–20, prepared by the Office of the Vice-Provost, Planning & Budget and available online at: www.planningandbudget.utoronto.ca/budget/reports.htm. Engineering space statistics from U of T Office of Space Management data, March 2020. U of T and St. George space statistics from U of T Facts and Figures 2019.

Chapter 1: Undergraduate Studies

1.1a Applications, Offers, All years’ data for applications and offers are based on annual Admissions Committee Registrations, Selectivity reports to Engineering Faculty Council (November), counting new admissions only, FT and Yield of First- and PT, all years of study. Excludes students with special status. Registrations only are from the U of T Enrolment Reporting Cube. Cube Parameters: Faculty = Faculty of Year Undergraduates, Applied Science & Engineering, All Fall Terms for 2010–2019, Degree Type = Under- 2010 to 2019 graduate; Stage of Study (SESLEV) = Year 1, New Intake (NEWINTK) = Yes, Measure = Headcount.

116 Data Sources

1.1b Applications, Offers, All years’ data for applications and offers are based on annual Admissions Committee Registrations, Selectivity reports to Engineering Faculty Council (November), counting new admissions only, FT and Yield of Domestic and PT, all years of study. Excludes students with special status. Registrations only are from the U of T Enrolment Reporting Cube. Cube Parameters: Faculty = Faculty of First-Year Undergraduates, Applied Science & Engineering, All Fall Terms for 2010–2019, Degree Type = Under- 2010 to 2019 graduate; Stage of Study (SESLEV) = Year 1, New Intake (NEWINTK) = Yes, Domestic / International (DOM_INTL) = Domestic; Measure = Headcount.

1.1c Applications, Offers, All years data for applications and offers are based on annual Admissions Committee Registrations, Selectivity reports to Engineering Faculty Council (November), counting new admissions only, FT and Yield of International and PT, all years of study. Excludes students with special status. Registrations only are from the U of T Enrolment Reporting Cube. Cube Parameters: Faculty = Faculty of First-Year Undergraduates, Applied Science & Engineering, All Fall Terms for 2010–2019, Degree Type = Under- 2010 to 2019 graduate; Stage of Study (SESLEV) = Year 1, New Intake (NEWINTK) = Yes, Domestic / International (DOM_INTL) = International; Measure = Headcount.

1.2a Ontario Secondary School Averages of incoming first-year students from Admissions Committee Report to Engi- Averages of Incoming neering Faculty Council (November). First-Year Undergraduates, 2010 to 2019

1.2b Two-Year Retention Averages of incoming first-year students from Admissions Committee Report to Engi- Rate, 2010 to 2017 neering Faculty Council (November). Retention rate is the proportion of students who successfully move on to second year in the fall semester following their first year.

1.3 Incoming First-Year Headcount from the U of T Enrolment Reporting Cube. Excludes students with special Undergraduates by Program, status. Cube Parameters: Faculty = Applied Science & Engineering; All Fall Terms for 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 2010–2019; Degree Type = Undergraduate; New Intake (NEWINTK) = Yes; Measure = Headcount; Programs of study based on [Program] field.

1.4a All Undergraduates by Headcount from the U of T Enrolment Reporting Cube. Includes full-time students, Program, 2010–2011 part-time students and students on PEY Co-op. Excludes students with special to 2019–2020 status. Cube Parameters: Faculty = Applied Science & Engineering; All Fall Terms for 2010–2019; Degree Type = Undergraduate; Stage of Study (SESLEV) = Years 1–4; Measure = Headcount; Programs of study based on [Program] field.

1.4b All Undergraduates by Headcount from the U of T Enrolment Reporting Cube. Includes full-time students, Program, Year of Study and part-time students and students on PEY Co-op. Excludes students with special status. Professional Experience Cube Parameters: Faculty = Applied Science & Engineering; Degree Type = Undergrad- uate; Stage of Study (SESLEV) = Years 1–4; Fall 2019; Programs of study based on Year Co-op, 2019–2020 [Program] field.

1.5a Undergraduate Student-to- Number of undergraduates from the U of T Enrolment Reporting Cube. Excludes Faculty Ratios by Academic students on PEY Co-op and students with special status. Cube Parameters: Faculty Area, 2019–2020 = Applied Science & Engineering; Fall 2019, Degree Type = Undergraduate; Associ- ated Org = blank (to exclude PEY Co-op); Measure = Headcount. Faculty Total does not include teaching done for Engineering by extra-divisional units (especially Arts & Science departments). Results are not adjusted for departmental contributions to shared first-year curriculum, Engineering Science or Engineering minors. Faculty counts are provided by the Chief Administrative Officer, Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering and used on a slip-year basis: totals from July 2019 are used to compare with 2019–2020 student counts. Calculation includes tenured, tenure-stream and teaching-stream faculty.

Data Sources 117 1.5b Undergraduate Full-Time Number of undergraduates from the U of T Enrolment Reporting Cube. Excludes Equivalent Student-to- students on PEY Co-op and students with special status. Cube Parameters: Faculty = Faculty Ratios, 2010–2011 Applied Science & Engineering; Fall 2019, Degree Type = Undergraduate; Associated Org = blank (to exclude PEY Co-op); Measure = Headcount. Does not include teaching to 2019–2020 done for Engineering by extra-divisional units (especially Arts & Science departments). Faculty counts are provided by the Chief Administrative Officer, Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering and used on a slip-year basis: totals from July 2019 are used to compare with 2019–2020 student counts. Calculation includes tenured, ten- ure-stream and teaching-stream faculty.

1.6a Undergraduate Participation Information regarding Canadian placements provided by the Registrar’s Office, Faculty in Summer Research of Applied Science & Engineering. International placement statistics provided by the Opportunities, 2011 to 2020 U of T Centre for International Experience.

1.6b Undergraduate Information regarding Canadian placements provided by the Registrar’s Office, Faculty Participation in Summer of Applied Science & Engineering. International placement statistics provided by the Research Opportunities by U of T Centre for International Experience. Academic Area, 2020

1.7a Number of Engineering Statistics provided by the Engineering Career Centre, Faculty of Applied Science & Undergraduate Students Engineering. Participating in PEY Co-op with Percentage Participation, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

1.7b Number of Canadian and Statistics provided by the Engineering Career Centre, Faculty of Applied Science & International PEY Co-op Engineering. Positions, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

1.7c Number of PEY Co-op Statistics provided by the Engineering Career Centre, Faculty of Applied Science & Employers, 2010–2011 Engineering. to 2019–2020

1.8a Number of Awards Received Award data from the U of T Student Accounts Cube. Parameters: Faculty = Applied by Cohort with Total Number Science & Engineering; Transaction Type = Income / Awards – Undergraduate; Needs- of Undergraduate Need- based Awards; Level of Instruction = Undergraduate; Enrolment Status = All (e.g. FINCA, CANC, etc.); Stage of Study (SESLEV) = Years 1–4 (exclude any N/A); Ses- Based Award Recipients, sions include most recent (current) academic year except for the Summer semester; 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 Measure = Dollar amount.

1.8b Total Value of Undergraduate Award data from the U of T Student Accounts Cube. Parameters: Faculty = Applied Financial Assistance and Science & Engineering; Transaction Type = Income / Awards – Undergraduate; Needs- Percentage Distributed based Awards; Level of Instruction = Undergraduate; Enrolment Status = All (e.g. incl. FINCA, CANC, etc.); Stage of Study (SESLEV) = Years 1–4 (exclude any N/A); Ses- by Year of Study, 2010– sions include most recent (current) academic year except for the Summer semester; 2011 to 2019–2020 Measure = Distinct student count.

1.9 Undergraduate Degrees All data from ROSI download: 5EA (Graduated Students); Faculty = APSC (Applied Awarded by Program, Science & Engineering). Includes Fall (Nov), Spring (March) and Summer (June) 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 .

118 Data Sources 1.10 U of T Engineering Degrees U of T and Canadian statistics are based on the 2018 calendar year and come from Awarded by Academic Area Engineers Canada Report of Enrolment & Degrees Granted (Canadian Engineers for Compared with Canadian Tomorrow, Trends in Engineering Enrolment and Degrees Awarded 2014-2018), released November 2019, and available online at: engineerscanada.ca/reports/ and North American enrolment-and-degrees-awarded-report. American statistics used to calculate North Degree Totals, 2018 American percentages are based on the 2018–2019 academic year and come from the 2019 American Society of Engineering Educators (ASEE) Report, available online at: www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/college-profiles

1.11a Number of Students Data provided by the Office of the Faculty Registrar, Faculty of Applied Science & and Percentage of Engineering. Based ROSI download: 5EA (Graduated Students); Degree Citation Code Class Graduating with = HON (Honours) or HHO (High Honours). Honours, 2011 to 2020

1.11b Number of Students on the Data provided by the Office of the Faculty Registrar, Faculty of Applied Science & Dean’s Honour List by Term Engineering. Based on ROSI data; Award Code = APHON. See footnote to Fig. 1.11b and Academic Area, Fall for an explanation regarding the impact of COVID-19 adaptations on the 2020 Winter term results. 2015 to Winter 2020

1.12a Number of Completed Minors Information provided by the Cross-Disciplinary Programs Office, Faculty of Applied and Percentage of Graduating Science & Engineering. Students Completing an Engineering Minor, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

1.12b Students Graduating with Information provided by the Cross-Disciplinary Programs Office, Faculty of Applied an Engineering Business Science & Engineering. Minor or Certificate, 2011–2012 to 2019–2020

Chapter 2: Graduate Studies

2.1a Domestic and International All data from ROSI download: 4BEG (Admissions Statistics). MASc Students: Applications, Offers, Registrations, Selectivity and Yield, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

2.1b Domestic and International All data from ROSI download: 4BEG (Admissions Statistics). Students who have fast- PhD Students: Applications, tracked from MASc programs into PhD programs are calculated separately (see Fig. Offers, Registrations, 2.6a) but have been included in this figure as applications, offers and admissions in order to more accurately reflect total PhD student intake. Selectivity and Yield, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

2.1c Domestic and International All data from ROSI download: 4BEG (Admissions Statistics). MEng and MHSc Students: Applications, Offers, Registrations, Selectivity and Yield, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

Data Sources 119 2.2a Graduate Students by Enrolment counts are from the U of T Enrolment Reporting Cube and exclude special Degree Type, 2010–2011 status students. Cube Parameters: Faculty = Applied Science & Engineering; All Fall to 2019–2020 Terms for 2010–2019; Measure = Headcount.

2.2b Graduate Enrolment by Enrolment counts are from the U of T Enrolment Reporting Cube and exclude special Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) status students. Cube Parameters: Faculty = Applied Science & Engineering; Measure and Headcount (HC) by = Headcount or Total FTE (UAR). Headcounts are reported for all fall terms from 2010–2019. FTEs are counted by academic year as reported in the cube (May to Academic Area, 2010– April). 2011 to 2019–2020

2.3a Undergraduate and Graduate Number of FTE undergraduates is from the U of T Enrolment Reporting Cube, excluding Full-Time Equivalent students on PEY Co-op and students with special status. Cube Parameters: Faculty = Ap- Student-to-Faculty Ratios, plied Science & Engineering; Fall terms 2010–2019; Associated Org = blank (to exclude PEY Co-op); Degree Type = Undergraduate; Measure = Headcount. To calculate Under- 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 graduate FTEs, part-time students are counted as 0.3 FTE. Number of FTE graduate stu- dents is from the U of T Enrolment Reporting Cube. Cube Parameters: Faculty = Applied Science & Engineering; Fall terms 2010–2019; Measure = Total FTE (UAR); excludes students with special status. Number of faculty included in the calculation is provided by the Chief Administrative Officer, Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering and used on a slip-year basis: totals from July 2019 are used to compare with 2019–2020 student counts. Graduate ratios include only tenured and tenure-stream faculty; Undergraduate ratios also include teaching stream faculty.

2.3b Full-Time Equivalent Graduate Number of FTE graduate students is from the U of T Enrolment Reporting Cube. Cube Student-to-Faculty Ratios Parameters: Faculty = Applied Science & Engineering; Fall 2019; Measure = Total by Academic Area and FTE (UAR). Includes all degree types but excludes students with special status. The number of graduate students per department is adjusted as per the budget calculation Degree Type, 2019–2020 for inter-departmental graduate student supervision. Faculty counts are provided by the Chief Administrative Officer, Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering, and are used on a slip-year basis: totals from July 2019 are used to compare with 2019–2020 student counts. Includes tenured and tenure-stream faculty only.

2.3c Ratio of Undergraduate Number of FTE undergraduates is from the U of T Enrolment Reporting Cube, exclud- to Graduate Full-Time ing students on PEY Co-op and students with special status. Cube Parameters: Faculty Equivalent Students, = Applied Science & Engineering; Fall terms 2010–2019; Associated Org = blank (to exclude PEY Co-op); Degree Type = Undergraduate; Measure = Headcount. To calcu- 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 late Undergraduate FTEs, part-time students are counted as 0.3 FTE. Number of FTE graduate students is from the U of T Enrolment Reporting Cube. Cube Parameters: Faculty = Applied Science & Engineering; Fall terms 2010–2019; Measure = Total FTE (UAR); Includes all degree types but excludes students with special status.

2.4a Graduate Student Funding Data from the U of T Student Accounts Reporting Cube. Parameters: Faculty = Applied by Category, 2009–2010 Science & Engineering; Transaction Type = Awards – Grad, Stipend, UT Employment; to 2018–2019 excludes Awards – Undergraduate, Waiver. Student funding reported by academic year (September to August).

2.4b Graduate Student Funding Data obtained from the U of T Student Accounts Reporting Cube. Parameters: Faculty by Category and Academic = Applied Science & Engineering; Transaction Type = Awards – Grad, Stipend, UT Area, 2018–2019 Employment; excludes Awards – Undergraduate, Waiver. Student funding reported by academic year (September to August).

2.5a Total External Graduate Data from the U of T Student Accounts Reporting Cube. Parameters: Faculty = Student Scholarships Applied Science & Engineering; Transaction Type = Income / Awards – Grad; Award by Source, 2009–2010 Income Source = External. Student funding reported by academic year (September to August). to 2018–2019

120 Data Sources 2.5b Number of NSERC and CIHR Data from the U of T Student Accounts Reporting Cube. Parameters: Faculty = Graduate Student Award Applied Science & Engineering; Transaction Type = Income / Awards – Grad; Award Recipients by Academic Area, Income Source = Federal — Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council; Measure = Distinct Student Count. Student funding reported by academic year (Sep- 2009–2010 to 2018–2019 tember to August).

2.6a Number of Students Fast- All data from ROSI download: 4FF (Student Registrations). Fast-tracked students are Tracked from MASc to identified by POSt codes that end in ‘PHD U’ and are counted when prior session PhD by Academic Area, POSt code was a Masters degree (MASc or MEng). To reflect fast-tracking practice, an academic year is defined as Summer-Fall-Winter (May to April). 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

2.6b Number of Direct-Entry PhD All data from ROSI download: 4FF (Student Registrations). Include all PhD students Students by Academic Area, where prior session POSt code was blank or AE NDEGP (recently-completed under- 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 graduate). Reported by academic year defined as Summer-Fall-Winter (May to April).

2.7a Average Time to Completion All data from ROSI download: 4BEA (Years to Graduate), originally created for Ontario for PhD, MASc, MEng and Council of Graduate Studies (OCGS) reporting purposes. The data reflects median MHSc Students, 2010– values based on the total number of terms in which a student is registered. Leaves, lapses and (in most cases) the term in which the convocation occurs are excluded. 2011 to 2019–2020 Where a student is fast-tracked from the MASc into a PhD, the total time for both programs is counted. Full-time, extended full-time and part-time MEng students are distinguished for greater clarity and accuracy.

2.7b to Time to Completion for All data from ROSI 4BEA downloads (Years to Graduate), originally created for Ontario 2.7h Graduate Students by Council of Graduate Studies (OCGS) reporting purposes. The data reflects median Academic Area, 2010– values based on the total number of terms in which a student is registered. Leaves, lapses and (in most cases) the term in which the convocation occurs are excluded. 2011 to 2019–2020 Where a student is fast-tracked from the MASc into a PhD, the total time for both programs is counted. Full-time, extended full-time and part-time MEng students are distinguished for greater clarity and accuracy.

2.8 Graduate Degrees Awarded All data from ROSI download: 5EA (Graduated Students); Faculty = APSC (Applied by Degree Type, 2010– Science & Engineering). 2011 to 2019–2020

2.9 ELITE Emphases Awarded, ELITE eligibility based on year of graduation and successful completion of a minimum 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 of 4 ELITE-designated courses. Data provided by the Vice-Dean Graduate Studies, Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering.

Chapter 3: Community

3.1 Continent of Origin: Student counts from the U of T Enrolment Reporting Cube, excluding students with Undergraduate special status. Cube Parameters: Faculty = Applied Science & Engineering; Year = Fall Students, Fall 2019 2019; Degree Type = Undergraduate; Measure = Headcount; Calculations based on Continent/Country of Citizenship [CUNCIT] parameter.

3.2a Incoming First-Year Headcount from the U of T Enrolment Reporting Cube. Excludes students with special Undergraduates with status. Cube Parameters: Faculty = Applied Science & Engineering; All Fall Terms for Percentage of Women, 2010–2019; Degree Type = Undergraduate; New Intake (NEWINTK) = Yes; Measure = Headcount; [Gender] parameter used to calculate percentage of women students. See 2010 to 2019 footnote to Fig. 3.2a for more information about changes in the reporting of gender beginning in 2017.

3.2b Incoming First-Year Headcount from the U of T Enrolment Reporting Cube. Excludes students with special Undergraduates with status. Cube Parameters: Faculty = Applied Science & Engineering; All Fall Terms for Percentage of International 2010–2019; Degree Type = Undergraduate; New Intake (NEWINTK) = Yes; Measure = Headcount; [DOM_INTL] parameter used to calculate percentage of international Students, 2010 to 2019 students.

Data Sources 121 3.2c Incoming First-Year Headcount from the U of T Enrolment Master Files, source of the Enrolment Re- Domestic and International porting Cube. Includes new and returning students. Excludes students with special Undergraduates, status. Cube Parameters: Faculty = Applied Science & Engineering; All Fall Terms for 2010–2019; Degree Type = Undergraduate; Stage of Study (SESLEV) = Year 1; New 2010 to 2019 Intake (NEWINTK) = Yes; Measure = Headcount

3.3a Undergraduate Enrolment Headcount from the U of T Enrolment Reporting Cube. Excludes students with special with Percentage of status. Cube Parameters: Faculty = Applied Science & Engineering; All Fall Terms Women, 2010 to 2019 for 2010–2019; Degree Type = Undergraduate; Measure = Headcount; [Gender] parameter used to calculate percentages of women. See footnote to Fig. 3.3a for more information about changes in the reporting of gender beginning in 2017.

3.3b Percentage of Women by Headcount from the U of T Enrolment Reporting Cube. Excludes students with special Undergraduate Program, status. Cube Parameters: Faculty = Applied Science & Engineering; Fall Terms for 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 2010–2019; Degree Type = Undergraduate; Gender = Female; Programs of study based on [Program] field. See footnote to Fig. 3.3a for more information about changes in the reporting of gender beginning in 2017.

3.3c Undergraduates with Headcount from the U of T Enrolment Reporting Cube. Excludes students with special Percentage of International status. Cube Parameters: Faculty = Applied Science & Engineering; All Fall Terms Students, 2010 to 2019 for 2010–2019; Degree Type = Undergraduate; Measure = Headcount; [DOM_INTL] parameter used to calculate percentages international students.

3.4 Undergraduate Degrees All data from ROSI download: 5EA (Graduated Students); Faculty = APSC (Applied Awarded by Gender, Science & Engineering). Includes Fall (Nov), Spring (March) and Summer (June) 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 convocations.

3.5 Continent of Origin: Graduate Student counts from the U of T Enrolment Reporting Cube, excluding students with Students, Fall 2019 special status. Cube Parameters: Faculty = Applied Science & Engineering; Year = Fall 2019; Measure = Headcount; Calculations based on Continent/Country of Citizenship [CUNCIT] parameter.

3.6a Graduate Students by Enrolment counts are from the U of T Enrolment Reporting Cube and exclude special Degree Type and Gender status students. Cube Parameters: Faculty = Applied Science & Engineering; All Fall with Percentage of Women Terms for 2010–2019; Measure = Headcount. [Gender] parameter used to calculate percentage of women. See footnote to Fig. 3.6b for more information about the report- Students, 2010–2011 ing of gender. to 2019–2020

3.6b Graduate Students by Enrolment counts are from the U of T Enrolment Reporting Cube and exclude special Degree Type and Domestic/ status students. Cube Parameters: Faculty = Applied Science & Engineering; All Fall International Status, with Terms for 2010–2019, Measure = Headcount. [DOM_INTL] parameter used to calcu- late percentage of international students. Percentage of International Students, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

3.7 Graduate Degrees Awarded All data from ROSI download: 5EA (Graduated Students); Faculty = APSC (Applied by Gender, 2010–2011 Science & Engineering). to 2019–2020

3.8 Engineering Undergraduate Information from the Engineering Society: www.skule.ca Clubs and Teams

3.9 Pre-University Information provided by the Engineering Student Outreach Office, Faculty of Applied Outreach Programs Science & Engineering.

122 Data Sources 3.10a Academic Staff by Information provided by the Chief Administrative Officer, Faculty of Applied Science & to Academic Area Engineering. Women academic staff include all ranks of professors in both the tenure 3.10h and teaching streams.

3.11 Total Number of Faculty with Information provided by the Chief Administrative Officer, Faculty of Applied Science & Percentage of Women Overall Engineering. and by Academic Rank, 2010–2011 to 2019–2020

3.12 Percentage of Women Information from the 2018 Resources Survey prepared by Engineers Canada for the Faculty at U of T Engineering National Council of Deans of Engineering and Applied Science (NCDEAS) and circulat- Compared with Women ed to Canadian engineering deans in July 2019. Data represents faculty counts as of November 15, 2018. An updated version of this report was not yet available at the Faculty in Ontario and time this Report went to print. Canadian Engineering Faculties, 2018–2019

3.13 Canada Research Chairs Information provided by the Divisional Reporting and Information Analyst, Facul- with Number and Percentage ty of Applied Science & Engineering. Includes data sourced from the Office of the of Women Chairholders, Vice-President, Research & Innovation and from the Canada Research Chairs Program website: www.chairs-chaires.gc.ca/home-accueil-eng.aspx 2011 to 2020

3.14 Total Staff by Academic Area, Information provided by the Manager, Finance and Budget, Faculty of Applied Science 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 & Engineering.

3.15 Summary of Progress Against Information provided by the Eagle’s Longhouse, in consultation with the Engineering the Recommendations of the Outreach Office, Office of the Vice-Dean, Graduate Studies, Office of the Vice-Dean, Blueprint for Action, 2020 Undergraduate Studies, and departmental offices.

3.16 Summary of Progress Against Information provided by the Dean’s Advisor on Black Inclusivity Initiatives and Student the Recommendations Inclusion & Transition Advisor, in consultation with the Office of the Vice-Dean, of Striving Toward Black Graduate Studies, Office of the Vice-Dean, Undergraduate Studies, and departmental offices. Inclusivity, 2020

Chapter 4: Research

4.1a Research Infrastructure Data from the U of T Research Information System (RIS) is current as of May 2020 Funding and Research and organized by grant year (e.g., 2018–2019 = April 2018 to March 2019 = Grant Operating Funding, 2009– Year 2019). Infrastructure Funding includes the following programs: Canada Foun- dation for Innovation (except the CFI Career Award), the Ontario Innovation Trust, the 2010 to 2018–2019 Ontario Research Fund (ORF) – Research Infrastructure, and the NSERC Research Tools and Instruments (RTI) Program.

4.1b Research Infrastructure Data from the U of T Research Information System (RIS) is current as of May 2020 Funding and Research and adjusted to reflect each PI’s department of budgetary appointment. Organized by Operating Funding by Year, grant year (e.g., 2018–2019 = April 2018 to March 2019 = Grant Year 2019). Fac- ulty data is provided by the Chief Administrative Officer, Faculty of Applied Science Source and Funding per & Engineering, and here includes tenured and tenure-stream faculty only, as reported Faculty Member, 2009– each July. Faculty counts are used on a slip-year basis: e.g. those reported in July 2010 to 2018–2019 2018 (for academic year 2017-18) are linked to Grant Year 2019 (Apr 2018 - Mar 2019).

Data Sources 123 4.1c Research Operating Funding Data from the U of T Research Information System (RIS) is current as of May 2020 by Year, Source and Funding and organized by grant year (e.g., 2018–2019 = April 2018 to March 2019 = Grant per Faculty Member, Year 2019). Research Operating Funding excludes the following infrastructure pro- grams: Canada Foundation for Innovation (except the CFI Career Award), the Ontario 2009–2010 to 2018–2019 Innovation Trust, the Ontario Research Fund (ORF) – Research Infrastructure, and the NSERC Research Tools and Instruments (RTI) Program. Faculty data is provided by the Chief Administrative Officer, Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering, and here includes tenured and tenure-stream faculty only, as reported each July. Faculty counts are used on a slip-year basis: e.g. those reported in July 2018 (for academic year 2017–2018) are linked to Grant Year 2019 (Apr 2018 to Mar 2019).

4.2a to Research Operating Data from the U of T Research Information System (RIS) is current as of May 2020 4.2g Funding by Academic Area and adjusted to reflect each PI’s department of budgetary appointment. Organized and Average Funding per by grant year (e.g., 2018–2019 = April 2018 to March 2019 = Grant Year 2019). Research Operating Funding excludes the following infrastructure programs: Canada Faculty Member, 2009– Foundation for Innovation (except the CFI Career Award), the Ontario Innovation Trust, 2010 to 2018–2019 the Ontario Research Fund (ORF) – Research Infrastructure and the NSERC Research Tools and Instruments (RTI) Program. Faculty data is provided by the Chief Adminis- trative Officer, Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering, and here includes tenured and tenure-stream faculty only, as reported each July. Faculty counts are used on a slip-year basis: e.g. those reported in July 2018 (for academic year 2017-18) are linked to Grant Year 2019 (Apr 2018 - Mar 2019).

4.3 Distribution of Research Data from the U of T Research Information System (RIS) is current as of May 2020 Operating Funding by and adjusted to reflect each PI’s department of budgetary appointment. Organized Academic Area, 2009– by grant year (e.g., 2018–2019 = April 2018 to March 2019 = Grant Year 2019). Research Operating Funding excludes the following infrastructure programs: Canada 2010 to 2018–2019 Foundation for Innovation (except the CFI Career Award), the Ontario Innovation Trust, the Ontario Research Fund (ORF) – Research Infrastructure and the NSERC Research Tools and Instruments (RTI) Program.

4.4a Tri-Agency and NCE Data from the U of T Research Information System (RIS) is current as of May 2020 Support: CIHR, NSERC and organized by grant year (e.g., 2018–2019 = April 2018 to March 2019 = Grant and NCE Funding, 2009– Year 2019). 2010 to 2018–2019

4.4b NSERC Funding, 2018–2019 Data from the U of T Research Information System (RIS) is current as of May 2020 and organized by grant year (e.g., 2018–2019 = April 2018 to March 2019 = Grant Year 2019). Sponsor = Natural Sciences & Engineering. Grant Year = 2019.

4.4c NSERC Industrial Partnership Data from the U of T Research Information System (RIS) is current as of May 2020 Funding by Program, and organized by grant year (e.g., 2018–2019 = April 2018 to March 2019 = Grant 2009–2010 to 2018–2019 Year 2019). Sponsor = Natural Sciences & Engineering / Research Partnerships Programs

4.4d Industrial Partnerships Data from the U of T Research Information System (RIS) is current as of May 2020 as Percentage of Total and organized by grant year (e.g., 2018–2019 = April 2018 to March 2019 = Grant NSERC Funding, 2009– Year 2019). Sponsor = Natural Sciences & Engineering. 2010 to 2018–2019

4.4e NSERC Research Grant Data from the U of T Research Information System (RIS) is current as of May 2020 Funding by Program, and organized by grant year (e.g., 2018–2019 = April 2018 to March 2019 = Grant 2009–2010 to 2018–2019 Year 2019). Sponsor = Natural Sciences & Engineering.

124 Data Sources 4.5a Canadian Peer Universities All data from NSERC Award Search Engine: www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca/ase-oro/index_eng. vs. University of Toronto asp. Based on Selection Committees for Discovery and Partnership Programs, but Share of NSERC Funding not Scholarships and Fellowships. Excludes Canada Research Chairs and Networks of Centres of Excellence and does not include Indirect Costs of Research. Research for Engineering Cumulative Subjects = all engineering and technology-related fields. Organized by grant year (e.g., Five-Year Share, 2014– 2018–2019 = April 2018 to March 2019 = Grant Year 2019). 2015 to 2018–2019

4.5b U of T Annual Share of NSERC All data from NSERC Award Search Engine: www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca/ase-oro/index_eng. Funding in Engineering, asp. Based on Selection Committees for Discovery and Partnership Programs, but 2009–2010 to 2018–2019 not Scholarships and Fellowships. Excludes Canada Research Chairs and Networks of Centres of Excellence and does not include Indirect Costs of Research. Research Subjects = all engineering and technology-related fields. Organized by grant year (e.g., 2018–2019 = April 2018 to March 2019 = Grant Year 2019).

4.6a Industry Research Funding Data from the U of T Research Information System (RIS) is current as of May 2020 by Academic Area, 2009– and organized by grant year (e.g., 2018–2019 = April 2018 to March 2019 = Grant 2010 to 2018–2019 Year 2019). Industry = Corporate.

4.6b Industrial Partnerships, Data from the U of T Research Information System (RIS) is current as of May 2020. 2019–2020 Industry = Corporate. Additional information gathered from selected websites (e.g. those of Industrial Research Chairs and major research consortia) and provided by individual departments within the Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering.

4.7 Engineering Invention Data from the Report of U of T Commercialization Indicators, Annual Supplement for Disclosures by Academic FY2020, provided by the Office of the Vice President, Research. Data current as of Area, 2015–2016 May 1, 2020. to 2019–2020

4.8 Spinoff Companies, Information provided by the Office of the Vice President, Research & Innovation 2001 to 2020 (OVPRI).

4.9 Chairs and Professorships, Chairholders are reported as of the HR turnover date at the end of the reporting cycle, 2019–2020 in this case, July 1, 2020, except in cases where new allocations (e.g. CRCs) have not yet been made public. List compiled from the following sources:

– Canada Research Chairs website: www.chairs-chaires.gc.ca/home-accueil-eng.aspx – Industrial Research Chairs website: www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca/Professors-Professeurs/ CFS-PCP/IRC-PCI_eng.asp – Office of Advancement, Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering – Office of the Vice-Dean, Research, Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering – Chief Administrative Officer, Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering – Distinguished Professors and University Professors from the Office of the Vice-President & Provost websites: www.provost.utoronto.ca/distinguished-professors/ www.provost.utoronto.ca/awards-funding/university-professors/

Data Sources 125 Chapter 5: Awards & Rankings

5.1 Summary of University Compiled from other figures in this chapter. of Toronto Engineering Performance in World Rankings

QS World University Rankings for Engineering and Technology

5.2a QS Top 50 World Data from QS World University Ranking website: www.topuniversities.com/university- Universities, 2020 rankings/university-subject-rankings/2020/engineering-technology

5.2b QS Top North American Data from QS World University Ranking website: www.topuniversities.com/university- Public Universities, 2020 rankings/university-subject-rankings/2020/engineering-technology

5.2c Canadian U15 Universities Data from QS World University Ranking website: www.topuniversities.com/university- in QS Top 200, 2020 rankings/university-subject-rankings/2020/engineering-technology

5.2d Canadian Universities in Data from QS World University Ranking website: www.topuniversities.com/university- QS by Subject, 2020 rankings/university-subject-rankings/2020/engineering-technology

Times Higher Education (THE)–Elsevier World University Ranking for Engineering and Technology

5.3a THE Top 50 World Data from THE World University Ranking website: www.timeshighereducation.com/ Universities, 2020 world-university-rankings/2020/subject-ranking/engineering-and-IT

5.3b THE Top North American Data from THE World University Ranking website: www.timeshighereducation.com/ Public Universities, 2020 world-university-rankings/2020/subject-ranking/engineering-and-IT

5.3c Canadian U15 Universities Data from THE World University Ranking website: www.timeshighereducation.com/ in THE Top 200, 2020 world-university-rankings/2020/subject-ranking/engineering-and-IT

Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) for Engineering Subjects

5.4 Canadian Universities in Data from ARWU website: www.shanghairanking.com/Shanghairanking-Subject- the Top 200 of the ARWU Rankings/index.html by Subject, 2019

National Taiwan University (NTU) Performance Ranking of Engineering Papers

5.5a NTU Top 60 World Data from National Taiwan University Performance Ranking of Scientific Papers for Universities, 2019 World Universities website: nturanking.lis.ntu.edu.tw/ranking/ByField/ENG. Data com- piled from Thomson Reuters’ science citation indexes.

5.5b NTU Top North American Data from National Taiwan University Performance Ranking of Scientific Papers for Public Universities, 2019 World Universities website: nturanking.lis.ntu.edu.tw/ranking/ByField/ENG. Data com- piled from Thomson Reuters’ science citation indexes.

5.5c Canadian U15 Universities Data from National Taiwan University Performance Ranking of Scientific Papers for in NTU Top 200, 2019 World Universities website: nturanking.lis.ntu.edu.tw/ranking/ByField/ENG. Data com- piled from Thomson Reuters’ science citation indexes.

126 Data Sources 5.5d Canadian Universities in Data from National Taiwan University Performance Ranking of Scientific Papers for NTU by Subject, 2019 World Universities website: nturanking.lis.ntu.edu.tw/ranking/ByField/ENG. Data com- piled from Thomson Reuters’ science citation indexes.

Rankings Based on Publications and Citations / Summary of Ranking Results

5.6a Number of Engineering Data from Thomson Reuters InCites™ covering 2014 to 2018. Includes public peer Publications Indexed institutions in Canada (U15) and U.S. (AAU plus at San Fran- by Thomson Reuters for cisco). Schema = Essential Science Indicators (Engineering, Materials Science). Association of American Universities (AAU) Public and Canadian Peer Institutions, 2014 to 2018

5.6b Summary of U15 Data from National Taiwan University Performance Ranking of Scientific Papers for Bibliometrics for World Universities website: nturanking.lis.ntu.edu.tw/ranking/ByField/ENG. Data com- Publications, 2014 to 2018 piled from Thomson Reuters’ science citation indexes.

5.6c Number of Engineering Data from Thomson Reuters InCites™ covering 2014 to 2018. Includes public peer Citations Indexed by Thomson institutions in Canada (U15) and U.S. (AAU plus University of California at San Fran- Reuters for Association of cisco). Schema = Essential Science Indicators (Engineering, Materials Science). American Universities (AAU) Public and Canadian Peer Institutions, 2014 to 2018

5.6d Summary of U15 Bibliometrics Data from Thomson Reuters InCites™ covering 2014 to 2018. Includes public peer for Citations, 2014 to 2018 institutions in Canada (U15) and U.S. (AAU plus University of California at San Fran- cisco). Schema = Essential Science Indicators (Engineering, Materials Science). Fac- ulty counts for analysis of U15 citations per faculty member are from the Engineers Canada 2018 Resources Report.

5.7 Summary of Major Information provided by the Director, Awards and Honours, Faculty of Applied Science International, National & Engineering. and Provincial Awards and Honours, 2010 to 2019

5.8a Number of Major National Information provided by the Director, Awards and Honours, Faculty of Applied Science and International Awards & Engineering. Received by U of T Engineering Compared to Other Canadian Engineering Faculties, 2019

5.8b Percentage of Engineering Information provided by the Director, Awards and Honours, Faculty of Applied Science Faculty and Total Major & Engineering. Faculty FTEs are based on the National Council of Deans of Engineer- Awards Received in Canadian ing and Applied Science (NCDEAS) 2018 Resources Report prepared by Engineers Canada and circulated to Canadian engineering deans in July 2019. Engineering Faculties, 2019

5.9 Number of Awards Received Information provided by the Director, Awards and Honours, Faculty of Applied Science by U of T Engineering & Engineering. Faculty Compared to Other Canadian Engineering Faculties, 2015 to 2019

Data Sources 127 5.10 Selected Awards Received by Information provided by the Director, Awards and Honours, Faculty of Applied Science Faculty and Staff, 2019–2020 & Engineering.

5.11 U of T Engineering Staff and Information provided by the Director, Awards and Honours, Faculty of Applied Science Faculty Awards, 2019–2020 & Engineering.

5.12 Engineering Alumni Information provided by the Office of Advancement and Alumni Relations, Faculty of Network Awards, 2019 Applied Science & Engineering.

Chapter 6: Advancement & Communications

6.1a Philanthropic Support, Statistics provided by the Office of Advancement and Alumni Relations, Faculty of 2019–2020 Applied Science & Engineering.

6.1b Philanthropic Support, Statistics provided by the Office of Advancement and Alumni Relations, Faculty of 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 Applied Science & Engineering.

6.1c Gift Designation, 2019–2020 Statistics provided by the Office of Advancement and Alumni Relations, Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering.

6.1d Engagement on U of T Statistics provided by the Office of Advancement and Alumni Relations, Faculty of Engineering CONNECT, Applied Science & Engineering. 2019–2020

6.2a U of T Engineering Media Information collected via Metrix Research Inc. (May 1, 2019 to April 30, 2020). Stories and Impressions, May 2019 to April 2020

6.2b Proportion of U of T Information collected via Metrix Research Inc. (May 1, 2019 to April 30, 2020). Engineering Impressions by Academic Area, 2019–2020

6.2c Proportion of U of T Information collected via Metrix Research Inc. (May 1, 2019 to April 30, 2020). Engineering Impressions by Strategic Priority Area, 2019–2020

6.2d Proportion of U of T Information collected via Metrix Research Inc. (May 1, 2019 to April 30, 2020). Engineering Media Stories by Outlet Location, 2019–2020

6.3a Twitter Statistics: Tweets, Data collected via Sprout Social (May 1, 2019 to April 30, 2020). Mentions, Retweets, Likes, May 2019 to April 2020

6.3b Facebook Statistics: Data collected via Sprout Social (May 1, 2019 to April 30, 2020). Posts, Comments, Shares, Reactions, May 2019 to April 2020

6.3c Instagram Statistics: Data collected via Sprout Social (May 1, 2019 to April 30, 2020). Posts, Comments, Likes, May 2019 to April 2020

128 Data Sources 6.4 Summary of Analytics for Websites: engineering.utoronto.ca and news.engineering.utoronto.ca. Information provid- U of T Engineering Faculty ed by Engineering Strategic Communications, Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering. Site and U of T Engineering Website statistics sourced from Google Analytics (May 1, 2019 to April 30, 2020). News Site, 2019–2020

6.5 Social Media Referrals Information provided by Engineering Strategic Communications, Faculty of Applied for U of T Engineering Science & Engineering. Website statistics sourced from Google Analytics (May 1, 2019 News, 2019–2020 to April 30, 2020).

6.6 Summary of Analytics Websites: discover.engineering.utoronto.ca, www.admit.engineering.utoronto.ca and for Discover Engineering, gradstudies.engineering.utoronto.ca. Website statistics sourced from Google Analytics You Belong Here and (May 1, 2019 to April 30, 2020). Engineering Graduate Studies Sites, 2019–2020

6.7 Top Stories on the Information provided by Engineering Strategic Communications, Faculty of Applied Engineering News and U of T Science & Engineering and University of Toronto Strategic Communications. Website News Websites, 2019–2020 statistics sourced from Google Analytics (May 1, 2019 to April 30, 2020).

Chapter 7: Financial & Physical Resources

7.1 Total Revenue, 2010– Information provided by the Chief Financial Officer, Faculty of Applied Science & 2011 to 2019–2020 Engineering.

7.2 Total Central Costs, Information provided by the Chief Financial Officer, Faculty of Applied Science & 2010–2011 to 2019–2020 Engineering.

7.3 Budget Data, 2010–2011 Information provided by the Chief Financial Officer, Faculty of Applied Science & to 2019–2020 Engineering.

7.4 Revenue Sources, Information provided by the Chief Financial Officer, Faculty of Applied Science & 2019–2020 Engineering.

7.5 Revenue Distribution, Information provided by the Chief Financial Officer, Faculty of Applied Science & 2019–2020 Engineering.

7.6 Total Operating Budget: Information provided by the Chief Financial Officer, Faculty of Applied Science & Breakdown by Expense, Engineering. 2019–2020 (Net of Central University Costs)

7.7 Summary of Buildings Data provided by the Director, Facilities & Infrastructure Planning, Faculty of Applied Occupied by Engineering, Science & Engineering. 2019–2020

7.8 Selected Infrastructure Information provided by Director, Facilities & Infrastructure Planning. Investments, 2019–2020

7.9 The Engineering Information from the Office of Space Management. Visit map.utoronto.ca for a full Neighbourhood campus map.

Data Sources 129 Office of the Dean Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering University of Toronto www.engineering.utoronto.ca