Confessions of a Nazi Spy: Warner Bros., Anti-Fascism and the Politicization of Hollywood

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Confessions of a Nazi Spy: Warner Bros., Anti-Fascism and the Politicization of Hollywood Confessions of a Nazi Spy: Warner Bros., Anti-Fascism and the Politicization of Hollywood by Steven J. Ross Sometimes a single movie can awaken the political consciousness of a Today, six decades after Pearl Harbor, it is easy to talk nostalgically nation. The opening of D.W. Griffith’sThe Birth of a Nation in 1915 about World War II as the “Good War,” a war where the forces of ignited protests and heated debates throughout the country. Twenty- “good” and “evil” were seemingly easy for Americans to identify. four years later, the opening of Warner Bros.’ Confessions of a Nazi Spy, Although recent films such asSaving Private Ryan (1998) and The the first film to portray Nazis as a threat to America, sparked equally Thin Red Line (1998) reminded audiences of the horrors of that war, passionate responses. “The evening of April 27, 1939,” declared film they never questioned the wisdom of American involvement. But in critic Welford Beaton, “will go down in screen history as a memorable the mid 1930s, the real horror for politically engaged citizens was how one. It marked the first time in the annals of screen entertainment that few people wanted to hear about the lurking dangers of fascism or a picture ever really said something definite about current events, really the threats posed by the expansionist policies of Adolf Hitler, Benito took sides and argued for the side with which it sympathized.” In an Mussolini and Francisco Franco. emotional memo to Jack Warner, producer Lou Edelman proudly told his boss, “Last night, the motion picture had a Bar Mitzvah. It came of Confessions of a Nazi Spy was a milestone in American cinema. It was age. It said, ‘Today I am a man.’ Confessions of a Nazi Spy was proud of the first major studio production to take an explicit stand on foreign what it had to say and how it said it, and the world was very articulate policy and warn Americans about the dangers of a particular regime. in its approval, and compliments to the courage that it took to say it.”1 Film scholars refer to the 1930s as the “Golden Age of Hollywood,” a time when films were at their lavish best. But the 1930s were also the Not everyone was enamored with the film. Nazi sympathizers in decade when Hollywood emerged as a major force in the nation’s politi- Milwaukee burned down the local Warner Bros. theater shortly after cal life. Movie stars used their celebrity to bring attention to the dangers the movie opened. Angry citizens in other cities picketed theaters, posed by fascists abroad and at home. Although anti-fascist celebrities slashed seats and threatened exhibitors. In Poland, anti-Semitic were able to reach tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of Americans, audiences hanged several theater owners in their movie houses for ex- politically engaged filmmakers wanted to reach millions. And no movie hibiting the film. Nazis banned the film everywhere they could exert moguls were more committed to fighting fascism than Harry and Jack pressure. For many people, Confessions of a Nazi Spy was more than Warner. At a time when few studios were willing to jeopardize lucrative just another movie.2 foreign sales, the Warner brothers produced a slew of highly politicized anti-fascist films:Black Legion (1937), Juarez (1939), Confessions of a 34. Edward G. Robinson as FBI man Edward Renard in Confessions of a Nazi Spy (1939), Espionage Agent (1939), British Intelligence (1940), Sea Nazi Spy (1939). Hawk (1940), Underground (1941) and Sea Wolf (1941). 48 WARNERS’ WAR: POLITICS, POP CULTURE & PROPAGANDA IN WARTIME HOLLYWOOD 49 35. An American Legionnaire This article examines the events that led to the making of Confessions Cagney, Sylvia Sidney and Gloria Stuart, had an estimated 4,000 Fox and MGM continued operating there until 1939). Things got (Ward Bond) confronts Nazis and the variety of reactions the studio encountered as it tried to dis- members and mounted frequent demonstrations, sponsored weekly worse for German Jews in the coming years: By 1935, Nuremberg at a Bund meeting in Confes- sions of a Nazi Spy (1939). seminate powerful messages to millions of Americans. The Warners’ radio shows, published their own newspaper and blockaded meet- Laws classified them as an inferior race and in 1938 anti-Semitic films proved so powerful that they prompted congressional investiga- ings of the Los Angeles German-American Bund. “There is hardly hatred exploded in Kristallnacht, when German mobs burned down tions of propaganda in motion pictures before and after World War a tea party today,” Ella Winter wrote in January 1938, “or a cocktail Jewish businesses. II—investigations that sent a chilling warning throughout the motion gathering, a studio lunch table or dinner even at a producer’s house picture industry about the dangers of political activism. at which you do not hear agitated discussion, talk of ‘freedom’ and Not all studio heads, not even Jewish ones like Louis B. Mayer and ‘suppression,’ talk of tyranny and the Constitution, of war, of world Adolph Zukor, were as worried about Nazism. Upon returning from The Rise of Anti-Fascist Hollywood economy and political theory.”4 Germany in 1934, MGM executive Irving Thalberg told Mayer that “a lot of Jews will lose their lives” but that “Hitler and Hitlerism will The 1930s did not mark the beginning of political activity in Hollywood’s actors, writers, directors and producers were at the pass; the Jews will still be there.” As late as August 1939, just one Hollywood. From the opening of the first nickelodeon in 1905, movies forefront of internationalist politics at a time when most Americans month prior to the Nazi invasion of Poland, Zukor told a reporter, and movie stars did more than simply entertain audiences. They rep- were still isolationists. A poll in November 1936 reported that 95% of “I don’t think that Hollywood should deal with anything but enter- resented a new means of political communication for a new century, Americans were opposed to United States participation in any potential tainment. The newsreels take care of current events.”8 a dangerous, and what many authorities regarded as a revolutionary, war. Three years later, a Gallup poll found that 42% of the public thought 36. Harry Warner and Louis means of communication that spoke directly to millions of Americans. it more important to investigate American war propaganda than to During the early 1930s, Warner Bros. produced scores of social prob- B. Mayer at a Red Cross Although silent films dealt with a wide variety of contentious political investigate the spread of Nazism, fascism or communism in America.5 lem films dealing with domestic ills caused by the Great Depression. fundraiser in 1940. issues, movie stars generally avoided the political spotlight. Studio By the mid 1930s, they turned their attention to foreign dangers and executives, noted Charlie Chaplin’s one-time assistant, feared “that if The Warner Brothers and the Rise of Anti-Fascist Cinema set out to use the screen to alert the nation to threats against demo- an actor took sides in any matter, he was bound to alienate a portion cracy. But they were constrained by Hollywood’s self-censorship of his public. And that was bad, as (theater magnate) Sid Grauman Committed anti-fascists knew they had to reach millions of board, the Production Code Administration (PCA), and its anti- would have said, ‘for the old box officeroo.’”3 Americans if they hoped to alter isolationist attitudes. Consequently, Semitic head, Joseph Breen, from making films that attacked or off-screen political activities were accompanied by on-screen activ- mocked foreign governments. Breen did little to hide his antipathy Celebrity attitudes toward politics changed in the 1930s as the dev- ism. Harry and Jack Warner were the unquestioned leaders of the for Jews. All that was wrong with Hollywood he blamed on the astating effects of the Great Depression, the election of Franklin D. anti-fascist cinematic crusade. No studio moguls were more devot- “lousy Jews” and insisted that “95%…are Eastern Jews, the scum of Roosevelt and the rapid spread of fascism in Europe politicized mil- edly anti-fascist and willing to put their money on the line than the the earth.” The studio heads, he wrote in 1932, were “simply a rotten lions of Americans and generated an unprecedented era of Hollywood Warner brothers. As Jack told a reporter in August 1936, studios bunch of vile people with no respect for anything beyond the making activism. As conditions at home and abroad worsened, movie industry “should strive for pictures that provide something more than a mere of money.”9 Breen did all he could to prevent the making of anti-Nazi personnel began to question their responsibility as citizens to stand idle hour or two of entertainment.”6 films or any film with openly sympathetic reference to Jews. up for ideas and causes they believed in, or against forces they felt threatened American democracy. Given the large numbers of Jews, For the Warners, fighting fascism in general and anti-Semitism in The brothers soon figured out a way to get around Code restrictions: European émigrés, liberals and radicals that populated Hollywood in particular was a deeply personal commitment. As the sons of a cobbler They would make obliquely anti-fascist movies based on real events. the 1930s, it is not surprising that anti-fascism emerged as the focal who fled deadly pogroms in Poland and immigrated to Baltimore in Black Legion, which opened in New York on January 16, 1937, told point of political action. 1883, Harry and Jack, the oldest and youngest of four brothers, felt the true story of a domestic fascist organization that wrought murder a deep commitment to helping Jews in America and abroad.
Recommended publications
  • Hollywood Movie Stars California History Section Display
    CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY NOVEMBER-DECEMBER 2016 HOLLYWOOD MOVIE STARS CALIFORNIA HISTORY SECTION DISPLAY VISIT OUR CURRENT DISPLAY: MINING IN CALIFORNIA California History Section 900 N Street Room 200 9:30-4 Monday-Friday INTRODUCTION California has been a moviemaking powerhouse for over a century now! Get star- struck, and relive the glory days of yesteryear’s actors through our carefully curated selection of images, ephemera and books. If you want more infor- mation about our movie history resources, you can find them in the fol- lowing places: California State Library Catalog: Subject Searches: Motion picture actors and actresses California motion picture* Hollywood history California Information File II: Subject Searches: Motion picture actors and actresses California Motion picture* Hollywood history California Information File (In-house use): Subject Searches: Moving Pictures Counties: Los Angeles: Hollywood Drama: Actor Names California Image File (In-house use): Subject searches: Portraits: Actor Names Motion Pictures Contacting us: Web-form: Ask us a Question Email: [email protected] Enjoy our display! VISUALS Hoover, Art Company. 192AD. [Lena Basquette] (7 Views). Silent Movie Scene. 192AD. Hartsook, Photo. 192AD. Mary Pickford. VISUALS Blake, Orville T. 1929. Grauamaus [Sic] Chinese, Hollywood, CA. Graphic. Arthur Wenzel at Theater in Oakland. 1916. Graphic. Hoover, Art Company. 192AD. [Alice Terry] (2 Views). A Cecil B. DeMille Production: Fredric March in “The Buccaneer.” 1937. Graphic. VISUALS Farrell Collection. 1916. Mary Pickford in Hulda from Holland. Graphic. T&D. N.D. [Actor]. Graphic. Dobbins Collection. N.D. [Actress]. Graphic. VISUALS Portraits. N.D. Graphic. [Actors]. 1916. Graphic. Garrick Theater (Philadelphia, Penn.). c1913. [Advertisement]. Philadelphia: Garrick Theater.
    [Show full text]
  • The Talk of the Town Continues…
    The Talk of the Town continues… “Kay Thompson was a human dynamo. My brothers and I were constantly swept up by her brilliance. Sam Irvin has captured all of this in his incredible book. I know you will thoroughly enjoy reading it.” – DON WILLIAMS, OF KAY THOMPSON & THE WILLIAMS BROTHERS “It’s an amazing book! Sam Irvin has captured Ms. T. to a T. I just re-read it and liked it even better the second time around.” – DICK WILLIAMS, OF KAY THOMPSON & THE WILLIAMS BROTHERS “To me, Kay was the Statue of Liberty. I couldn’t imagine how a book could do her justice but, by golly, Sam Irvin has done it. You won’t be able to put it down.” – BEA WAIN, OF KAY THOMPSON’S RHYTHM SINGERS “Kay was the hottest thing that ever hit the town and one of the most captivating women I’ve ever met in my life. There’ll never be another one like her, that’s for sure. A thorough examination of her astounding life was long overdue and I can’t imagine a better portrait than the one Sam Irvin has written. Heaven.” – JULIE WILSON “This fabulous Kay Thompson book totally captured her marvelous enthusiasm and talent and I’m delighted to be a part of it. I adore the cover with enchanting Eloise and the great picture of Kay in all her intense spirit!” – PATRICE MUNSEL “Thank you, Sam, for bringing Kay so richly and awesomely ‘back to life.’ Adventuring with Kay through your exciting book is like time-traveling through an incredible century of showbiz.” – EVELYN RUDIE, STAR OF PLAYHOUSE 90: ELOISE “At Metro… she scared the shit out of me! At Paramount… while shooting Funny Face… I got to know and love her.
    [Show full text]
  • German Operetta on Broadway and in the West End, 1900–1940
    Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.202.58, on 26 Sep 2021 at 08:28:39, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/2CC6B5497775D1B3DC60C36C9801E6B4 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.202.58, on 26 Sep 2021 at 08:28:39, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/2CC6B5497775D1B3DC60C36C9801E6B4 German Operetta on Broadway and in the West End, 1900–1940 Academic attention has focused on America’sinfluence on European stage works, and yet dozens of operettas from Austria and Germany were produced on Broadway and in the West End, and their impact on the musical life of the early twentieth century is undeniable. In this ground-breaking book, Derek B. Scott examines the cultural transfer of operetta from the German stage to Britain and the USA and offers a historical and critical survey of these operettas and their music. In the period 1900–1940, over sixty operettas were produced in the West End, and over seventy on Broadway. A study of these stage works is important for the light they shine on a variety of social topics of the period – from modernity and gender relations to new technology and new media – and these are investigated in the individual chapters. This book is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core at doi.org/10.1017/9781108614306. derek b. scott is Professor of Critical Musicology at the University of Leeds.
    [Show full text]
  • HOLLYWOOD – the Big Five Production Distribution Exhibition
    HOLLYWOOD – The Big Five Production Distribution Exhibition Paramount MGM 20th Century – Fox Warner Bros RKO Hollywood Oligopoly • Big 5 control first run theaters • Theater chains regional • Theaters required 100+ films/year • Big 5 share films to fill screens • Little 3 supply “B” films Hollywood Major • Producer Distributor Exhibitor • Distribution & Exhibition New York based • New York HQ determines budget, type & quantity of films Hollywood Studio • Hollywood production lots, backlots & ranches • Studio Boss • Head of Production • Story Dept Hollywood Star • Star System • Long Term Option Contract • Publicity Dept Paramount • Adolph Zukor • 1912- Famous Players • 1914- Hodkinson & Paramount • 1916– FP & Paramount merge • Producer Jesse Lasky • Director Cecil B. DeMille • Pickford, Fairbanks, Valentino • 1933- Receivership • 1936-1964 Pres.Barney Balaban • Studio Boss Y. Frank Freeman • 1966- Gulf & Western Paramount Theaters • Chicago, mid West • South • New England • Canada • Paramount Studios: Hollywood Paramount Directors Ernst Lubitsch 1892-1947 • 1926 So This Is Paris (WB) • 1929 The Love Parade • 1932 One Hour With You • 1932 Trouble in Paradise • 1933 Design for Living • 1939 Ninotchka (MGM) • 1940 The Shop Around the Corner (MGM Cecil B. DeMille 1881-1959 • 1914 THE SQUAW MAN • 1915 THE CHEAT • 1920 WHY CHANGE YOUR WIFE • 1923 THE 10 COMMANDMENTS • 1927 KING OF KINGS • 1934 CLEOPATRA • 1949 SAMSON & DELILAH • 1952 THE GREATEST SHOW ON EARTH • 1955 THE 10 COMMANDMENTS Paramount Directors Josef von Sternberg 1894-1969 • 1927
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    NOTES INTRODUCTION 1. Nathanael West, The Day of the Locust (New York: Bantam, 1959), 131. 2. West, Locust, 130. 3. For recent scholarship on fandom, see Henry Jenkins, Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture (New York: Routledge, 1992); John Fiske, Understanding Popular Culture (New York: Routledge, 1995); Jackie Stacey, Star Gazing (New York: Routledge, 1994); Janice Radway, Reading the Romance (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, 1991); Joshua Gam- son, Claims to Fame: Celebrity in Contemporary America (Berkeley: Univer- sity of California Press, 1994); Georganne Scheiner, “The Deanna Durbin Devotees,” in Generations of Youth, ed. Joe Austin and Michael Nevin Willard (New York: New York University Press, 1998); Lisa Lewis, ed. The Adoring Audience: Fan Culture and Popular Media (New York: Routledge, 1993); Cheryl Harris and Alison Alexander, eds., Theorizing Fandom: Fans, Subculture, Identity (Creekskill, N.J.: Hampton Press, 1998). 4. According to historian Daniel Boorstin, we demand the mass media’s simulated realities because they fulfill our insatiable desire for glamour and excitement. To cultural commentator Richard Schickel, they create an “illusion of intimacy,” a sense of security and connection in a society of strangers. Ian Mitroff and Warren Bennis have gone as far as to claim that Americans are living in a self-induced state of unreality. “We are now so close to creating electronic images of any existing or imaginary person, place, or thing . so that a viewer cannot tell whether ...theimagesare real or not,” they wrote in 1989. At the root of this passion for images, they claim, is a desire for stability and control: “If men cannot control the realities with which they are faced, then they will invent unrealities over which they can maintain control.” In other words, according to these authors, we seek and create aural and visual illusions—television, movies, recorded music, computers—because they compensate for the inadequacies of contemporary society.
    [Show full text]
  • Cecil B. Demille's Greatest Authenticity Lapse?
    Cecil B. DeMille’s Greatest Authenticity Lapse? By Anton Karl Kozlovic Spring 2003 Issue of KINEMA THE PLAINSMAN (1937): CECIL B. DeMILLE’S GREATEST AUTHENTICITY LAPSE? Cecil B. Demille was a seminal founder of Hollywood whose films were frequently denigrated by critics for lacking historical verisimilitude. For example, Pauline Kael claimed that DeMille had ”falsified history more than anybody else” (Reed 1971: 367). Others argued that he never let ”historical fact stand in the way of a good yarn” (Hogg 1998: 39) and that ”historical authenticity usually took second place to delirious spectacle” (Andrew 1989: 74). Indeed, most ”film historians regard De Mille with disdain” (Bowers 1982: 689)and tended to turn away in embarrassment because ”De Mille had pretensions of being a historian” (Thomas 1975: 266). Even Cecil’s niece Agnes de Mille (1990: 185) diplomatically referred to his approach as ”liberal.” Dates, sequences, geography, and character bent to his needs.” Likewise, James Card (1994: 215) claimed that: ”DeMille was famous for using historical fact only when it suited his purposes. When history didn’t make a good scene, he threw it out.” This DeMillean fact-of-life was also verified by gossip columnist Louella Parsons (1961: 58) who observed that DeMille ”spent thousands of dollars to research his films to give them authenticity. Then he would disregard all the research for the sake of a scene or a shot that appealed to him as better movie-making.” As Charles Hopkins (1980: 357, 360) succinctly put it: ”De Mille did not hesitate
    [Show full text]
  • In 1925, Eight Actors Were Dedicated to a Dream. Expatriated from Their Broadway Haunts by Constant Film Commitments, They Wante
    In 1925, eight actors were dedicated to a dream. Expatriated from their Broadway haunts by constant film commitments, they wanted to form a club here in Hollywood; a private place of rendezvous, where they could fraternize at any time. Their first organizational powwow was held at the home of Robert Edeson on April 19th. ”This shall be a theatrical club of love, loy- alty, and laughter!” finalized Edeson. Then, proposing a toast, he declared, “To the Masquers! We Laugh to Win!” Table of Contents Masquers Creed and Oath Our Mission Statement Fast Facts About Our History and Culture Our Presidents Throughout History The Masquers “Who’s Who” 1925: The Year Of Our Birth Contact Details T he Masquers Creed T he Masquers Oath I swear by Thespis; by WELCOME! THRICE WELCOME, ALL- Dionysus and the triumph of life over death; Behind these curtains, tightly drawn, By Aeschylus and the Trilogy of the Drama; Are Brother Masquers, tried and true, By the poetic power of Sophocles; by the romance of Who have labored diligently, to bring to you Euripedes; A Night of Mirth-and Mirth ‘twill be, By all the Gods and Goddesses of the Theatre, that I will But, mark you well, although no text we preach, keep this oath and stipulation: A little lesson, well defined, respectfully, we’d teach. The lesson is this: Throughout this Life, To reckon those who taught me my art equally dear to me as No matter what befall- my parents; to share with them my substance and to comfort The best thing in this troubled world them in adversity.
    [Show full text]
  • RESISTANCE MADE in HOLLYWOOD: American Movies on Nazi Germany, 1939-1945
    1 RESISTANCE MADE IN HOLLYWOOD: American Movies on Nazi Germany, 1939-1945 Mercer Brady Senior Honors Thesis in History University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Department of History Advisor: Prof. Karen Hagemann Co-Reader: Prof. Fitz Brundage Date: March 16, 2020 2 Acknowledgements I want to thank Dr. Karen Hagemann. I had not worked with Dr. Hagemann before this process; she took a chance on me by becoming my advisor. I thought that I would be unable to pursue an honors thesis. By being my advisor, she made this experience possible. Her interest and dedication to my work exceeded my expectations. My thesis greatly benefited from her input. Thank you, Dr. Hagemann, for your generosity with your time and genuine interest in this thesis and its success. Thank you to Dr. Fitz Brundage for his helpful comments and willingness to be my second reader. I would also like to thank Dr. Michelle King for her valuable suggestions and support throughout this process. I am very grateful for Dr. Hagemann and Dr. King. Thank you both for keeping me motivated and believing in my work. Thank you to my roommates, Julia Wunder, Waverly Leonard, and Jamie Antinori, for being so supportive. They understood when I could not be social and continued to be there for me. They saw more of the actual writing of this thesis than anyone else. Thank you for being great listeners and wonderful friends. Thank you also to my parents, Joe and Krista Brady, for their unwavering encouragement and trust in my judgment. I would also like to thank my sister, Mahlon Brady, for being willing to hear about subjects that are out of her sphere of interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Mean Streets: Death and Disfiguration in Hawks's Scarface
    Mean Streets: Death and Disfiguration in Hawks's Scarface ASBJØRN GRØNSTAD Consider this paradox: in Howard Hawks' Scarface, The Shame of the Nation, violence is virtually all-encompassing, yet it is a film from an era before American movies really got violent. There are no graphic close-ups of bullet wounds or slow-motion dissection of agonized faces and bodies, only a series of abrupt, almost perfunctory liquidations seemingly devoid of the heat and passion that characterize the deaths of the spastic Lyle Gotch in The Wild Bunch or the anguished Mr. Orange, slowly bleeding to death, in Reservoir Dogs. Nonetheless, as Bernie Cook correctly points out, Scarface is the most violent of all the gangster films of the eatly 1930s cycle (1999: 545).' Hawks's camera desists from examining the anatomy of the punctured flesh and the extended convulsions of corporeality in transition. The film's approach, conforming to the period style of ptc-Bonnie and Clyde depictions of violence, is understated, euphemistic, in its attention to the particulars of what Mark Ledbetter sees as "narrative scarring" (1996: x). It would not be illegitimate to describe the form of violence in Scarface as discreet, were it not for the fact that appraisals of the aesthetics of violence are primarily a question of kinds, and not degrees. In Hawks's film, as we shall see, violence orchestrates the deep structure of the narrative logic, yielding an hysterical form of plotting that hovers between the impulse toward self- effacement and the desire to advance an ethics of emasculation. Scarface is a film in which violence completely takes over the narrative, becoming both its vehicle and its determination.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER No. 93 December 18Th, 2008
    ___________________________________________________________________________ NEWSLETTER No. 93 December 18th, 2008 Marlene Dietrich Collection Berlin is a division of Deutsche Kinemathek - Museum für Film und Fernsehen If you want your fellow fans to receive this newsletter or if you just want to add information write to [email protected] . If you want to support the work of the Deutsche Kinemathek of which Marlene Dietrich Collection Berlin is a division you can do so by joining the "Friends and Supporters of Filmmuseum Berlin". Just go to http://www.fffb.de You’ll find us on the web at www.marlenedietrich.org and www.marlene.com ___________________________________________________________________________ Dear friends and fans, – [VELIKAJA MARLEN: ISTORIJA ZVEZDY ] The german newspaper “Frankfurter The great Marlene – History of the Star Allgemeine Zeitung” by placing Marlene on the November 11 2008 – March 8 2009 front page reminded us that she was the one State Museum Tsaritsyno, Moscow who forever changed the dress code for women. Be it Hillary Clinton or german chancellor Angelika Merkel – they all wear trousers nowadays. Crossdressing has become normal for women; or is it that to gain and to remain in power you have to wear trousers? Men are more conservative. How would your reaction be if George Clooney or Bill Clinton would wear womens clothes for a gala opening? Everyone would regard this as a “coming out” – which proofs that some of the old taboos are still valid. But wouldn’t it be nice if George Bush - as a sign that he lost power forever – would have to wear skirts? Almost exactly fifteen years after the collection came to Berlin the Moscow exhibition is the biggest Marlene Dietrich exhibition we’ve ever done.
    [Show full text]
  • Boxoffice Barometer (March 6, 1961)
    MARCH 6, 1961 IN TWO SECTIONS SECTION TWO Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer presents William Wyler’s production of “BEN-HUR” starring CHARLTON HESTON • JACK HAWKINS • Haya Harareet • Stephen Boyd • Hugh Griffith • Martha Scott • with Cathy O’Donnell • Sam Jaffe • Screen Play by Karl Tunberg • Music by Miklos Rozsa • Produced by Sam Zimbalist. M-G-M . EVEN GREATER IN Continuing its success story with current and coming attractions like these! ...and this is only the beginning! "GO NAKED IN THE WORLD” c ( 'KSX'i "THE Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer presents GINA LOLLOBRIGIDA • ANTHONY FRANCIOSA • ERNEST BORGNINE in An Areola Production “GO SPINSTER” • • — Metrocolor) NAKED IN THE WORLD” with Luana Patten Will Kuluva Philip Ober ( CinemaScope John Kellogg • Nancy R. Pollock • Tracey Roberts • Screen Play by Ranald Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer pre- MacDougall • Based on the Book by Tom T. Chamales • Directed by sents SHIRLEY MacLAINE Ranald MacDougall • Produced by Aaron Rosenberg. LAURENCE HARVEY JACK HAWKINS in A Julian Blaustein Production “SPINSTER" with Nobu McCarthy • Screen Play by Ben Maddow • Based on the Novel by Sylvia Ashton- Warner • Directed by Charles Walters. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer presents David O. Selznick's Production of Margaret Mitchell’s Story of the Old South "GONE WITH THE WIND” starring CLARK GABLE • VIVIEN LEIGH • LESLIE HOWARD • OLIVIA deHAVILLAND • A Selznick International Picture • Screen Play by Sidney Howard • Music by Max Steiner Directed by Victor Fleming Technicolor ’) "GORGO ( Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer presents “GORGO” star- ring Bill Travers • William Sylvester • Vincent "THE SECRET PARTNER” Winter • Bruce Seton • Joseph O'Conor • Martin Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer presents STEWART GRANGER Benson • Barry Keegan • Dervis Ward • Christopher HAYA HARAREET in “THE SECRET PARTNER” with Rhodes • Screen Play by John Loring and Daniel Bernard Lee • Screen Play by David Pursall and Jack Seddon Hyatt • Directed by Eugene Lourie • Executive Directed by Basil Dearden • Produced by Michael Relph.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Vs. Film: LA CHIENNE Vs. SCARLET STREET
    BOOK VS FILM Brian Light author’s commentary on the incestuous bed- counterpoint to the plotline. The book is fellows of art and commerce. frank in its depiction of the sordid relation- ew French writers in the first In his preface, de la Fouchardière calls ship between Lulu and Dédé and the pseudo half of the 20th century could attention to the theatrical staging used to romantic/financial arrangement between rival the output of Georges de set up the narrative structure of the story: Lulu and Legrand. la Fouchardière. He produced “I have chosen a technique borrowed from In 1931, Jean Renoir adapted the book 33 humorous novels and crime dramatic art…each of the characters who to the screen with the same title. An early Fthrillers, over a dozen of which were adapted participate in the story will in turn take the example of poetic realism, this was only for the screen in the 1920s and ’30s. He was a stage and tell in his own way about events Renoir’s second talking picture, and, to his prodigious journalist and devout pacifist who in which he has been implicated.” In chap- credit, he shot the entire film using actual covered WWI and WWII for two newspapers, ters titled “He,” “She,” and “The Other,” Parisian street locations. The preceding year La Vague and Paris-Soir, and he also wrote a we are provided with three distinct points of Alfred Knopf published an English transla- column for the weekly journal Paris-Sport. In view. “He” (Maurice Legrand) is the princi- tion of La Chienne, titled Poor Sap, which 1929, he published La Chienne (The Bitch), pal storyteller, and, as such, he is depicted enjoyed a second printing.
    [Show full text]