Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette College of Communication Faculty Research and Communication, College of Publications 1-1-2016 "The irB th Control Divide": U. S. Press Coverage of Contraception, 1873-2013 Ana C. Garner Marquette University,
[email protected] Angela Michel Marquette University Accepted version. Journalism & Communication Monographs, Vol. 18, No. 4 (2016): 180-234. DOI. © 2016 SAGE. Used with permission. NOT THE PUBLISHED VERSION; this is the author’s final, peer-reviewed manuscript. The published version may be accessed by following the link in the citation at the bottom of the page. “The Birth Control Divide” U.S. Press Coverage of Contraception, 1873-2013 Ana C. Garner College of Communication, Marquette University Milwaukee, WI Angela R. Michel College of Communication, Marquette University Milwaukee, WI Abstract: For more than 140 years, religious, medical, legislative, and legal institutions have contested the issue of contraception. In this conversation, predominantly male voices have attached reproductive rights to tangential moral and political matters, revealing an ongoing, systematic attempt to regulate human bodies, especially those of women. This analysis of 1873- 2013 press coverage of contraception in the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, and the Chicago Tribune shows a division between institutional ideology and real-life experience; women’s reproductive rights are negotiable. Although journalists often reported that contraception was a factor in the everyday life of women and men, press accounts also showed religious, medical, legislative, and legal institutions debating whether it should be. Contraception originally was predominately viewed as a practice of prostitutes (despite evidence to the contrary) but became a part of everyday life.