DOCSLIB.ORG

PSYCHOLOGICAL and NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING STANDARDIZED TIME GRID Final Version: January, 2016 * Published Administration Time

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PSYCHOLOGICAL and NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING STANDARDIZED TIME GRID Final Version: January, 2016 * Published Administration Time PSYCHOLOGICAL AND NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING STANDARDIZED TIME GRID AGE RANGE APPROPRIATE PUBLISHED TEST TEST NAME FOR TEST ADMINISTRATION TARGET AREAS/PURPOSE ACRONYM ADMINISTRA- TIME * TION Abel and Becker Cognition Scale ABCS Adults Adult and Self-report assessment of minimization and other Intellectually cognitive distortions related to sexually assaultive Disabled Offender behavior (29 items) versions: Estimate 20 mins Abel Assessment for Sexual AASI-2 12+ 10-20 mins Assessment of sexual interests in children and sexual Interest – 2 behavior problems. Abel Assessment for Sexual AASI-3 18+ 10-20 mins Assessment of sexual interests in children and sexual Interest – 3 behavior problems. Abel-Blasingame Assessment ABID 18 – 65 1 hr 20 mins Assessment of sexual interests in children and sexual System for Individuals With behavior problems. Measure orally administered. Intellectual Disabilities Achenbach Behavior Checklist: ABCL 18 -- 59 20 mins estimate Behavior rating scale: adult ADHD assessment Adult Behavior Checklist Achenbach Behavior Checklist: OABCL 60 -- 90+ 20 mins estimate Behavior rating scale: older adult to geriatric adult Adult Behavior Checklist - OLDER attentional processing assessment ADULT Achenbach Behavior Checklist: ASR/18-59 18 – 59 20 mins estimate Behavior rating scale: adult ADHD assessment Adult Behavior Checklist - Self- Report Achenbach Behavior Checklist: OASR 60 -- 90+ 20 mins Behavior rating scale: older adult to geriatric adult Adult Behavior Checklist - Self- attentional processing assessment Report Achenbach Behavior Checklist: CBCL/6-18 6 -- 18 20 mins estimate Behavior rating scale: child and adolescent ADHD Child Behavior Checklist - School- assessment Age Achenbach Behavior Checklist: CBCL/1.5-5 1.5 -- 5 20 mins estimate Behavior rating scale: early childhood ADHD assessment Child Behavior Checklist - Pre- School * Published Administration Time refers to the time required to administer the measure as listed by the test publisher, with this time having been estimated for cases where no formal published administration time is available. Optum/OHBS-CA Psych Testing Guideline criteria specify that authorization is to be based on the total published administration times for the measures able to be authorized by Optum/ OHBS-CA, and will not exceed 150% of published test administration time. Final Version: January, 2016 PSYCHOLOGICAL AND NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING STANDARDIZED TIME GRID AGE RANGE APPROPRIATE PUBLISHED TEST TEST NAME FOR TEST ADMINISTRATION TARGET AREAS/PURPOSE ACRONYM ADMINISTRA- TIME * TION Achenbach Behavior Checklist: C-TRF 1.5 -- 5 20 mins estimate Behavior rating scale: early childhood ADHD assessment Child Behavior Checklist - Pre- School Caregiver/Teacher Report Form Achenbach Behavior Checklist: TRF/6-18 6 -- 18 20 mins estimate Behavior rating scale: child and adolescent ADHD Child Behavior Checklist – assessment School-Age Teacher Report Form Achenbach Behavior Checklist: YSR/11-18 11 -- 18 20 mins estimate Behavior rating scale: late childhood and adolescent Child Behavior Checklist - School- ADHD assessment Age Youth Self Report Form Achenbach Semi-Structured SCICA 6 – 18 60 – 90 mins Assessment of aggressive, rule-breaking, anxious, Clinical Interview for Children and depressed, attention, language, motor, self-control, Adolescents somatic problems Achenbach System of Empirically ASEBA 1.5 – 90+ Estimate 20 mins Assessment of adaptive and maladaptive behavioral- Based Assessment Modules: per rating scale emotional functioning Preschool 1.5- 5 School-Age 6 – 18 Adult 18 – 59 Older Adult 60 – 90+ Adaptive Behavior Scale- ABS-RC:2 18 – 79 15 - 30 mins To determine an individual's strengths and weaknesses Residential and Community: 2nd among adaptive domains and factors. Edition (by AAMR) Adaptive Behavior Scales: 2nd ABSS:2 3 -- 21 60 -- 120 mins Measure retardation, emotional maladjustment, Edition (by AAMR) developmental disadvantages. Assess adaptive behavior Adaptive Behavior Assessment ABAS-3 5 -- 89 20 mins each Adaptive behavior measure System parent/teacher/adult forms Published Administration Time refers to the time required to administer the measure as listed by the test publisher, with this time having been estimated for cases where no formal published administration time is available. OptumHealth/OHBS-CA Psych Testing Guideline criteria specify that authorization is to be based on the total published administration times for the measures able to be authorized by OptumHealth/ OHBS-CA, and will typically not exceed 150% of published test administration time. Final Version: 2 January, 2016 PSYCHOLOGICAL AND NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING STANDARDIZED TIME GRID AGE RANGE APPROPRIATE PUBLISHED TEST TEST NAME FOR TEST ADMINISTRATION TARGET AREAS/PURPOSE ACRONYM ADMINISTRA- TIME * TION Adaptive Behavior Inventory ABI 6 -- 18.11 20 -- 25 mins Evaluate functional daily living scales, communication with others, and social interaction of school age children who are Mental retarded, have emotional difficulties or are normal with no difficulties. Adaptive Behavior Street Survival SSSQ 9.5 & up 60 mins Assess fundamental community living and prevocational Skills Questionnaire skills of mentally disabled adolescents and adults ADD-H: Comprehensive ACTeRS Grades K -- 8th 15 mins Behavior rating scale: child ADHD assessment Teacher's Rating Scales, 2 Ed ADD-H: Comprehensive Parent ACTeRS Grades K -- 8th 15 mins Behavior rating scale: child ADHD assessment Form ADHD Self-Report Scale ASRS Adults 5 mins Self-report adult ADHD screening measure. Adolescent Apperception Test 12 -- 19 45 -- 60 mins Projective tests attempts to elicit internal conflicts and interpersonal interactions Adolescent Co-Pathology Adolescent 60 mins Self-report inventory: general adolescent diagnostic Inventory screening measure Adolescent Drinking Index ADI 12 -- 17 5 mins Quickly assess alcohol abuse; assess self-medicating vs. rebellious types; physical, social, psycho indicators Adolescent Psychopathology APS 12 -- 19 45 -- 60 mins 325 items: Clinical disorder, personality, psychosocial Scale problem content response style. Adolescent Psychopathology APS-SF 12 -- 19 15 -- 20 mins Brief self-report measure of psychopathology & Scale-Short Form problem behaviors in adolescents; cross section of psychopathology and psychological problems relevant to adolescent adjustment Adolescent Symptom Inventory-4 ASI-4 12 -- 18 Not listed, estimate Behavior rating scale: assessment of 15 emotional and 20 mins; self, behavioral disorders parent, teacher versions Published Administration Time refers to the time required to administer the measure as listed by the test publisher, with this time having been estimated for cases where no formal published administration time is available. OptumHealth/OHBS-CA Psych Testing Guideline criteria specify that authorization is to be based on the total published administration times for the measures able to be authorized by OptumHealth/ OHBS-CA, and will typically not exceed 150% of published test administration time. Final Version: 3 January, 2016 PSYCHOLOGICAL AND NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING STANDARDIZED TIME GRID AGE RANGE APPROPRIATE PUBLISHED TEST TEST NAME FOR TEST ADMINISTRATION TARGET AREAS/PURPOSE ACRONY ADMINISTRA- TIME * M TION Adult ADD Symptom Checklist (by Adult Estimate 20 mins 78-item self-report measure to assist in the diagnosis of Amen) adult ADHD. Adult Manifest Anxiety Scale AMAS 18 -- 59 10 mins Self-report inventory: adult anxiety assessment Adult Suicide Ideation ASIQ 18 & up 10 mins Self-report inventory: adolescent suicidality assessment Questionnaire Aggregate Neurobehavioral ANSER Child Estimate 20 mins Set of questionnaires designed to collect background Student Health & Educational per questionnaire information from parents, teachers, students helpful to the Review evaluation of learning and behavior problems Alcohol Use Inventory AUI 16 & up 35 -- 60 mins Identify patterns of behavior, attitudes, symptoms associated with abuse of alcohol Alloway Working Memory AWMA-2 5 – 79 Screener: 5-10 Measure of working memory. Assessment – 2 mins; Short Form: 10-15 mins; Long Form: 30 mins Ammons Quick Test Adults Estimate 10-20 Brief IQ test and picture vocabulary test mins Anger Disorders Scale ADS 18 & up Short form: 10 mins Anger assessment over 5 domains, 18 sub-scales Long form: 20 mins Animal Naming Test Child Not listed (compare Test of verbal abilities and deficits; downward extension to 15-20 mins for of the Boston Naming Test Boston Naming Test) Anxiety Disorders Interview ADIS-IV Adult version; Not listed; Estimate Structured diagnostic assessment interview to assess Schedule – IV child version 20-40 mins anxiety disorders and differential diagnosis per DSM-IV; adult and child versions Published Administration Time refers to the time required to administer the measure as listed by the test publisher, with this time having been estimated for cases where no formal published administration time is available. OptumHealth/OHBS-CA Psych Testing Guideline criteria specify that authorization is to be based on the total published administration times for the measures able to be authorized by OptumHealth/ OHBS-CA, and will typically not exceed 150% of published test administration time. Final Version: 4 January, 2016 PSYCHOLOGICAL AND NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING STANDARDIZED TIME GRID AGE RANGE APPROPRIATE PUBLISHED TEST TEST NAME FOR TEST ADMINISTRATION TARGET AREAS/PURPOSE ACRONY ADMINISTRA- TIME * M TION Aphasia Screening Tests (e.g., Ages range from Times
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) for the Early Diagnosis of Dementia Across a Variety of Healthcare Settings (Protocol)
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) for the early diagnosis of dementia across a variety of healthcare settings (Protocol) Lees RA, Stott DJ, McShane R, Noel-Storr AH, Quinn TJ Lees RA, Stott DJ, McShane R, Noel-Storr AH, Quinn TJ. Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) for the early diagnosis of dementia across a variety of healthcare settings. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 10. Art. No.: CD011333. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011333. www.cochranelibrary.com Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) for the early diagnosis of dementia across a variety of healthcare settings (Protocol) Copyright © 2014 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. TABLE OF CONTENTS HEADER....................................... 1 ABSTRACT ...................................... 1 BACKGROUND .................................... 1 OBJECTIVES ..................................... 4 METHODS ...................................... 4 REFERENCES ..................................... 7 APPENDICES ..................................... 8 DECLARATIONSOFINTEREST . 19 Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) for the early diagnosis of dementia across a variety of i healthcare settings (Protocol) Copyright © 2014 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [Diagnostic Test Accuracy Protocol] Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE)
    [Show full text]
  • Teleneuropsychology (Telenp) in Response to COVID-19: Practical Guidelines to Balancing Validity Concerns with Clinical Need
    Teleneuropsychology (TeleNP) in Response to COVID-19: Practical Guidelines to Balancing Validity Concerns with Clinical Need Rene Stolwyk, DPsych(Clin.Neuro), PsyBA Dustin B. Hammers, Ph.D., ABPP(CN) Senior Lecturer and Clinical Neuropsychologist Board Certified in Clinical Neuropsychology Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health Associate Professor, Department of Neurology Monash University, Melbourne, Australia University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Twitter: @rene_stolwyk Lana Harder, PhD, ABPP C. Munro Cullum, Ph.D., ABPP-CN Board Certified in Clinical Neuropsychology Professor of Psychiatry, Neurology, and Neurosurgery Board Certified Subspecialist in Pediatric Neuropsychology Pam Blumenthal Distinguished Professor of Clinical Psychology Children’s Medical Center Dallas Senior Neuropsychologist, O’Donnell Brain Institute Associate Professor of Psychiatry and Neurology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] INS Webinar Presented on 4/2/2020 Objectives Following this webinar, attendees will be able to: • Understand the evidence base supporting TeleNP procedures as well as the strengths and limitations of different models • Apply knowledge of models of TeleNP and evaluate potential feasibility within your own clinical settings • Understand key legal and ethical considerations when providing TeleNP services Outline • Ethical and Legal Challenges • Logistical and Practical Considerations • Models of TeleNP • Evidence for use of Specific Measures over TeleNP and Patient Satisfaction • Practical Considerations for Home-Based TeleNP Our Experience with TeleNP • Dr. Hammers leads the University of Utah TeleNP Program • Joint relationship between University of Utah Cognitive Disorders Clinic and St.
    [Show full text]
  • (MCI) and Dementias in Your Clinical Practice
    6/6/18 Assessment, Identification, and Management of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Dementias in Your Clinical Practice Mark Hogue, Psy.D. Donald McAleer, Psy.D., ABPP Northshore Neurosciences Overview • MCI • Definitions, Subtypes, Screening/ assessment • Dementias • Definitions, Subtypes, Screening / Assessment • Management of Cognitive issues for the general clinician • Referrals/ treatments • Family • Legal / Driving 1 6/6/18 Erie Times-News June 3, 2018 Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment • Globally, the number of people diagnosed with dementia is increasing every year at an alarming rate. There are currently over 46.8 million people living with dementia and this is estimated to rise to 131.5 million people by 2050. (Tozer, 7/5/17) • Dementia • A loss of cognitive processes from a prior level of cognitive processes, as compared to age-mates, and due to a pathophysiological process. • MCI • An intermediate step between normal cognition and dementia • A measurable deficit in at least one domain, absent dementia and showing no appreciable deficit in ADL functioning 2 6/6/18 Mild Cognitive Impairment • Diagnos(c concepts to describe cogni(ve change in aging • Benign senescent forge-ulness (BSF) – Kral, 1962 • Mild Cogni?ve Impairment (MCI) – Reisberg et al., 1982 • Age-Associated Memory Impairment (AAMI) – CooK et al., 1986 • Late-life forge-ulness (LLF) – BlacKford & La Rue, 1989 • Age-Associated Cogni?ve Decline (AACD) – Levy et al., 1994 • Cogni?ve Impairment No Demen?a (CIND) – Graham et al., 1997 • Amnes?c Mild Cogni?ve
    [Show full text]
  • List of Psychological Tests Material Was Prepared for Use As an Aid in Handling Requests for Psychological Testing
    List of Psychological Tests Material was prepared for use as an aid in handling requests for psychological testing. The minutes allocated for each test include administration, scoring and write up. Determination of the medical necessity of psychological tests always requires consideration of the clinical facts of the specific case to assure that tests given are a cost-effective means of determining the appropriate treatment for the individual patient and are related to the diagnosis and treatment of covered mental health conditions. INSTRUMENT TYPE AGE MINUT COMMENTS ES 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire (16-PF) Personality 16+ 30 35-60 min per Tests in Print for admin time only ABEL Screen Sexual Interest Adol + 120 Primarily forensic in nature: may not be covered Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment 60 Preschool Module Behav Rating Scale 1.5-5 10 Caregiver-Teacher Report Form Behav Rating Scale 1.5-5 10 Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Behav Rating Scale 1.5-5 15 Teacher Report Form Behav Rating Scale 6-18 20 Youth Self-Report (YSR) Behav Rating Scale 11-18 20 ACTeERS-ADD-H Comprehensive, Teachers Rating Scale Behav Rating Scale 5 – 13 15 Adaptive Behavior Assessment System (ABAS II) Behav Rating Scale 0-89 30 Adaptive Behavior Scale (ABS) Developmental 3-18 30 ADHD Rating Scale Behav Rating Scale 4 – 18 15 Adolescent Anger Rating Scale Behav Rating Scale 11-19 15 Adolescent Apperception Cards Projective Personality 12 – 19 60 Adult Behavior Checklist (ABCL) Behav Rating Scale 18-89 30 Admin. Time 20 min. + 10 min. for scoring, interpretation, write up. Adolescent Psychopathology Scale Personality Child-adult 60 Alzheimer’s Quick Test (AQT) Neuro Adult 10 Amen System Checklist Behav Rating Scale Adult 15 Animal Naming Neuro Child-adult 10 Aphasia Screening Test (Reitan Indiana) Neuro 5+ 30 Asperger’s Syndrome Diagnostic Scales (ASDS) Rating scale 5-18 20 Attention Deficit Disorder Eval.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relation Between Intelligence and Adaptive Behavior: a Meta-Analysis
    The Relation between Intelligence and Adaptive Behavior: A Meta-Analysis by Copyright 2017 Ryan M. Alexander Ed.S., University of Kansas, May 2013 B.S., Brigham Young University, May 2006 Submitted to the graduate degree program in Educational Psychology and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy ________________________________ Matthew R. Reynolds, Ph.D., Chair ________________________________ Steven W. Lee, Ph.D. ________________________________ Vicki Peyton, Ph.D. ________________________________ Christopher R. Niileksela, Ph.D. ________________________________ Paul L. Markham, Ph.D. Date Defended: May 11 th , 2017 The Dissertation Committee for Ryan M. Alexander certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation THE RELATION BETWEEN INTELLIGENCE AND ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR: A META- ANALYSIS ________________________________ Matthew R. Reynolds, Ph.D., Chair Date approved: May 11 th , 2017 ii ABSTRACT Intelligence tests and adaptive behavior scales measure vital aspects of the multidimensional nature of human functioning. Assessment of each is a required component in the diagnosis or identification of intellectual disability, and both are frequently used conjointly in the assessment and identification of other developmental disabilities. The present study investigated the population correlation between intelligence and adaptive behavior using psychometric meta- analysis. The main analysis included 148 samples with 16,468 participants overall. Following correction for sampling error, measurement error, and range departure, analysis resulted in an estimated population correlation of ρ = .51. Moderator analyses indicated that the relation between intelligence and adaptive behavior tended to decrease as IQ increased, was strongest for very young children, and varied by disability type, adaptive measure respondent, and IQ measure used.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Intellectual Disability: Clinical Assessments in Atkins Cases James W
    Hofstra Law Review Volume 46 | Issue 4 Article 8 6-1-2018 Evaluating Intellectual Disability: Clinical Assessments in Atkins Cases James W. Ellis Caroline Everington Ann M. Delpha Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Ellis, James W.; Everington, Caroline; and Delpha, Ann M. (2018) "Evaluating Intellectual Disability: Clinical Assessments in Atkins Cases," Hofstra Law Review: Vol. 46 : Iss. 4 , Article 8. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr/vol46/iss4/8 This document is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Law Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ellis et al.: Evaluating Intellectual Disability: Clinical Assessments in Atkin EVALUATING INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY: CLINICAL ASSESSMENTS IN A TKINS CASES James W. Ellis * CarolineEverington ** Ann M Delpha *** ABSTRACTt The intersection of intellectual disability and the death penalty is now clearly established Both under the US. Supreme Court's constitutional decisions and under the terms of many state statutes, individual defendants who have that disability cannot be sentenced to death or executed. It now falls to trial, appellate, and post-conviction * James W. Ellis is a Distinguished University Professor and Professor of Law at the University of New Mexico School of Law. He has served as President of the American Association on Mental Retardation (now the American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities), and as Law Reporter for the American Bar Association's Criminal Justice Mental Health Standards project.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Symptom Validity Assessment in European Countries: Development and State of The
    Clínica y Salud ISSN: 1130-5274 [email protected] Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid España Merten, Thomas; Dandachi-FitzGerald, Brechje; Hall, Vicki; Schmand, Ben A.; Santamaría, Pablo; González-Ordi, Héctor Symptom validity assessment in European countries: Development and state of the art Clínica y Salud, vol. 24, núm. 3, noviembre, 2013, pp. 129-138 Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid Madrid, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=180628831001 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Clínica y Salud 24 (2013) 129-138 Vol. 24, No. 3, Noviembre 2013 ISSN: 1130-5274 Clínica y Salud Investigación Empírica en Psicología Número monográfico Evaluación de la simulación y la validez de los síntomas en el ámbito clínico Special Issue Symptom Validity Assessment and Malingering in Clinical Contexts Director/Editor Héctor González Ordi Clínica y Salud Directores Asociados/Associate Editors Mª Isabel Casado Morales Mª Xesús Froján Parga Mª Eugenia Olivares Crespo Miguel Ángel Pérez Nieto Viente Prieto Cabras Mª Fe Rodríguez Muñoz Pablo Santamaría Fernández Albert Sesé Abad www.elsevier.es/clysa Clinical and Health Journal of Empirical Research in Psychology Symptom validity assessment in European countries: Development and state of the art Thomas Mertena*, Brechje Dandachi-FitzGeraldb,
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing Methods to Evaluate Cognitive Deficits in Commercial Airline Pilots
    Comparing Methods to Evaluate Cognitive Deficits in Commercial Airline Pilots Joshua Potocko, MD/MPH UCSF Occupational and Environmental Medicine Residency 30 Min Background Philosophy Scope Comparisons Evidence Review: Example Questions for the Group BACKGROUND LCDR Joshua R. Potocko, MC (FS/FMF), USN “The views expressed in this presentation reflect the results of research conducted by the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, nor the United States Government.” Potocko’s 6 Proclamations: Certain baseline cognitive functions decline with age. Within an individual, these declines are difficult to predict. Between individuals, different types of decline are variable. Understanding the following are critically important to aviation safety: Age-related declines Temporary disturbances in cognitive function, Stable (or progressive) baseline disturbances due to injury, illness, disease, medication, and substance use. When does cognitive dysfunction become unsafe? Cognitive Function Typical, Normal, Adequate, Average Cognitive Inefficiency Circadian, Fatigue, Mood, Stress Cognitive Deficiency Injury, Illness, Meds, Substances Cognitive Disability Above plus regulatory decisions => requires safety factor Baseline New Baseline Unfit Period Injury Illness Meds Baseline Progressive Decline Age XX? Permanently Unfit Disease? PHILOSOPHY Research Question: What is the “best” way to evaluate cognitive deficits in airline pilots? Best: historical? expert opinion?...or
    [Show full text]
  • Insert Title of Research Report
    ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. ________ Research Report _________ Prevalence Rates, Profile, and Outcomes for Federally Sentenced Offenders with Cognitive Deficits Ce rapport est également disponible en français. Pour en obtenir un exemplaire, veuillez vous adresser à la Direction de la recherche, Service correctionnel du Canada, 340, avenue Laurier Ouest, Ottawa (Ontario) K1A 0P9.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Utility of Cognistat in Multiprofessional Team Evaluations of Patients with Cognitive Impairment in Swedish Primary Care
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation International Journal of Family Medicine Volume 2014, Article ID 649253, 10 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/649253 Research Article Clinical Utility of Cognistat in Multiprofessional Team Evaluations of Patients with Cognitive Impairment in Swedish Primary Care Maria M. Johansson,1 Anna S. Kvitting,2 Ewa Wressle,1 and Jan Marcusson1 1 Department of Geriatric Medicine and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linkoping¨ University, SE-581 85 Linkoping,¨ Sweden 2 Primary Health Care and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linkoping¨ University, SE-581 85 Linkoping,¨ Sweden Correspondence should be addressed to Maria M. Johansson; [email protected] Received 21 October 2013; Revised 8 January 2014; Accepted 12 February 2014; Published 23 March 2014 Academic Editor: Samuel Y. S. Wong Copyright © 2014 Maria M. Johansson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Background. Diagnostic evaluations of dementia are often performed in primary health care (PHC). Cognitive evaluation requires validated instruments. Objective. Toinvestigate the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of Cognistat in a primary care population. Methods. Participants were recruited from 4 PHC centres; 52 had cognitive symptoms and 29 were presumed cognitively healthy. Participants were tested using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Clock Drawing Test (CDT), and Cognistat. Clinical diagnoses, based on independent neuropsychological examination and a medical consensus discussion in secondary care, were used as criteria for diagnostic accuracy analyses. Results. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 0.85, 0.79, 0.85, and 0.79, respectively, for Cognistat; 0.59, 0.91, 0.90, and 0.61 for MMSE; 0.26, 0.88, 0.75, and 0.46 for CDT; 0.70, 0.79, 0.82, and 0.65 for MMSE and CDT combined.
    [Show full text]
  • Included See Page 24 for More Information
    16204 N. Florida Ave. • Lutz, FL 33549 PRSRT STD U.S. POSTAGE PAID Professional Assessment Products Bolingbrook IL Permit # 422 July 2018 Leaving talent assessment Are there more than 10 assessment professionals on your team? to chance? Contact our Sales and National Accounts team for additional benets. See page 22. Identify talent Life is better when Develop employees Grow your business everyone’s included See page 24 for more information. A test that removes barriers is inherently a more In addition, items that show differential item inclusive measure. functioning associated with gender or ethnicity The RIAS-2 affords cultural sensitivity by have been eliminated. eliminating the need to read items in English. Bottom line: The RIAS-2 is culturally sensitive. RIAS-2 For more information, see page 150 Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales™, Second Edition or visit parinc.com/RIAS2. July 2018 Looking for something a little more scientic? Add technology and objectivity to the hiring equation. Recruiting is too important to leave to chance. Hiring the wrong person lowers performance and destroys organizational morale. The costs in turnover alone are incredible. Go beyond gut instincts. Let InVista’s talent assessment expertise fortify your company’s recruitment process with science and technology. We make it easy to make the best talent decisions. To learn more, see page 24 or visit invistatalent.com. a division of From the CEO Check out Dear Valued Customers, this catalog’s In our April catalog, we looked back in recognition of PAR’s 40th featured items anniversary. Once again, this is a milestone that we owe to you, our Customers, and we thank you for your unwavering support over the past 40 years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neuropsychological Profile of Professional Action Video Game Players
    The neuropsychological profile of professional action video game players Julie Justine Benoit1,2, Eugenie Roudaia3, Taylor Johnson4, Trevor Love4 and Jocelyn Faubert2 1 Department of Psychology, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada 2 Faubert Lab, École d'Optométrie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada 3 Rotman Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 4 Infinite Esports and Entertainment, Frisco, TX, United-States ABSTRACT In the past 20 years, there has been growing research interest in the association between video games and cognition. Although many studies have found that video game players are better than non-players in multiple cognitive domains, other studies failed to replicate these results. Until now, the vast majority of studies defined video game players based on the number of hours an individual spent playing video games, with relatively few studies focusing on video game expertise using performance criteria. In the current study, we sought to examine whether individuals who play video games at a professional level in the esports industry differ from amateur video game players in their cognitive and learning abilities. We assessed 14 video game players who play in a competitive league (Professional) and 16 casual video game players (Amateur) on set of standard neuropsychological tests evaluating processing speed, attention, memory, executive functions, and manual dexterity. We also examined participants' ability to improve performance on a dynamic visual attention task that required tracking multiple objects in three-dimensions (3D-MOT) over five sessions. Professional players showed the largest performance advantage relative to Amateur players in a test of visual spatial memory (Spatial Span), with more modest benefits in a test of selective and sustained attention (d2 Test of Attention), and test of auditory working memory (Digit Span).
    [Show full text]