DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix B – Northeast Sector Area Transit Plan Survey Prepared by NRG Research Group

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix B – Northeast Sector Area Transit Plan Survey Prepared by NRG Research Group Appendix B – Northeast Sector Area Transit Plan Survey Prepared by NRG Research Group November 2013 Northeast Sector Area Transit Plan Survey June 2013 Prepared by: NRG Research Group Suite 1380-1100 Melville Street Vancouver, BC V6E 4A6 Table of Contents Summary…………………………………………………………………….................................................... 3 Method……………………………………………………………………………..................……....................... 6 Participants - Panel………………………………….................…………………………..................................... 7 Weighting – Panel.....………………….................………………………………………..................................... 8 Participants - Public………………………………….................…………………………..................................... 10 Results…………………………………………………………………………………..................…...................... 11 Current Transit Use and Opinions of Service in Northeast Sector............................................... 11 Opinions on Potential Changes to the Northeast Sector Transit Network................................. 23 Public Consultation-Specific Questions....................................................................................... 53 Appendix: Demographics..……………………………………………..................………....................... 57 Appendix: Survey – TransLink Listens Version…...........…………......................................... 65 Appendix: Survey – Consulting (Public) Version…...........………........................................ 73 Appendix: Promotional Materials..........………………………………......................................... 82 Summary Background • From May 28th to June 14th, 2013, TransLink conducted a TransLink Listens* panel survey with residents of the Northeast Sector (Coquitlam, Port Coquitlam, Port Moody, Anmore and Belcarra); as well as those who travel within or through the Northeast Sector at least once a month and reside in Pitt Meadows, Maple Ridge, Vancouver, Burnaby, or New Westminster. A total of 441 TransLink Listens panelists completed the survey. • During the same time period, TransLink also conducted the Northeast Sector Public Consultation Survey. This was a very similar and related survey with the general public using an open link from the TransLink website. This survey received a total of 699 completions. • The purpose of the survey was to gather feedback on the issues and opportunities with the transit network in the Northeast Sector, to provide input into Phase 1 of TransLink’s Northeast Sector Area Transit Plan. • The results from the panel were weighted to reflect the known age, gender, region, and main mode of travel parameters of the Metro Vancouver region (based on census data and prior demographic studies). • The results from the Northeast Sector Public Consultation Survey were not weighted in this way, and should be interpreted as directional and with caution due to the lack of controls within an open link study. *Note: Responses of TransLink Listens panelists may differ from random general population surveying, even with weighting, due to the panel’s likely more frequent experience with transit and transportation surveys. 3 Summary Current Transit Use in Northeast Sector • To have qualified for the study, TransLink Listens panel invitees were required to either live in Anmore, Belcarra, or the Tri-Cities (Coquitlam, Port Coquitlam, or Port Moody) or travel within or through any part of the Northeast Sector by any mode of travel at least monthly or more often. The public survey required no pre-qualification to complete. • Transit Use: • Among panelists, 31% use public transit more than once a week, while one in ten (11%) never use public transit. • Among the public, 66% take transit more than once a week, while only 4% say they never use transit. • Most Common Transit Service Usage in Past Six Months: • Among panelists, 97 B-Line (mentioned by 27%), West Coast Express (20%). • Among the public, 97 B-Line (47%), 160 Port Coquitlam/Vancouver (44%). • Transit Service Usage Differences Between Respondent Groups: • Route C38 has been used in the past six months by 22% of Public Survey respondents, but only 5% of TransLink Listens respondents. • Ratings of overall quality of transit service in the Northeast Sector are similar between the two groups. Panelists give an average rating of 5.2 out of 10 and the Public version averages 5.1. 4 Summary Opinions on Potential Changes to the Northeast Sector Transit Network • The most important change in service that would affect respondents’ decision to use transit in the Northeast Sector more often is the same for both groups: increased service frequency (average rating of 7.6 out of 10 for Panelists, 8.5 for Public). • The other changes suggested are rated as follows: • Make existing service more direct: average rating of 7.5 out of 10 for Panelists, 7.8 for Public • Improve the travel time for existing service: average rating of 7.4 out of 10 for Panelists, 7.9 for Public • Provide new service and/or more direct connections to areas of the Northeast Sector currently without service or direct connections: average rating of 7.2 out of 10 for Panelists, 7.8 for Public • Extend service hours earlier or later: average rating of 7.0 out of 10 for Panelists, 7.7 for Public • Add Park & Ride space at transit exchanges: average rating of 6.7 out of 10 for Panelists, 5.8 for Public • More bus stops with a shelter and route information: average rating of 6.5 out of 10 for Panelists, 6.4 for Public • Improve amenities at transit exchanges (e.g., seating, lighting, retail, etc.): average rating of 5.7 out of 10 for Panelists, 5.6 for Public • More bicycle lockers at transit exchanges: average rating of 4.4 out of 10 for Panelists, 3.9 for Public 5 Method Data Collection & Weighting 6 Participants – TransLink Listens Version TransLink operates an online advisory panel called TransLink Listens among residents of the Metro Vancouver area. This panel is open to all interested residents, and allows residents to have their say on important transportation issues, typically via online surveys. TransLink Listens panelists whose municipality of record is within the Northeast Sector, along with those who reside in Pitt Meadows, Maple Ridge, Burnaby, or New Westminster were invited to complete a survey regarding the current state of transit use in the Northeast Sector. A soft launch involving 200 of the selected panelists was conducted on May 28, 2013. The full launch to all 1,183 remaining Northeast Sector and Burnaby/New Westminster panelists was sent out on May 30. On June 10, a decision was made to include residents of the city of Vancouver (1,649 panelists). The survey was open until 4:00pm on June 14. There were two reminder emails sent to maximize the response rate: one on June 5, and the second on June 13. Of the 3,032 TransLink Listens panelists invited, a total of 441 completed the survey (for a final completion rate of 14.5%). In all, 229 were completed by residents of the Northeast Sector. Another 49 were completed by those who reside in Pitt Meadows/Maple Ridge, 71 surveys were completed by residents of the City of Vancouver, and 83 surveys were completed by residents of Burnaby and New Westminster. A small number of surveys (6) were completed by respondents who have moved from the Northeast Sector since they joined the panel. The data in this study were weighed to more closely represent the age, gender, and region profile of Metro Vancouver residents from the targeted regions as well as main mode of travel. The weighting methodology is described on the following slides. 7 Weighting – TransLink Listens Version Weighting the data occurs in two steps, based on the RIM weighting process: Step 1: Calculating Sex-Age by Region weights • Using 2011 Canada Census data, the appropriate proportions of Sex (male and female) and Age (16-34, 35-54, 55+) groups by region are determined for Vancouver, Burnaby/ New Westminster, and Northeast. • This results in a 6 (Sex-Age groups) by 3 (Regions) matrix of proportions that sum to 1.00 (a sample row for Burnaby/New Westminster is shown below). • The obtained proportions for those same matrix cells are then calculated based on the survey results. • By dividing the obtained proportions into the parameter proportions, weights for each group are obtained. Each case is up- or down-weighted in accordance with its under- or over-representation in the sample. M 16 - 34 M 35 - 54 M 55+ F 16 - 34 F 35 - 54 F 55+ Burnaby/ New Westminster 0.03845 0.04126 0.03681 0.03756 0.04413 0.04224 (Parameter) Burnaby/ New Westminster 0.02529 0.05517 0.03908 0.01149 0.03218 0.03448 (Obtained) Burnaby/ New Westminster 1.52 0.75 0.94 3.27 1.37 1.22 (Weight) 8 Weighting – TransLink Listens Version Step 2: Correcting for Main Mode of Transportation after applying the first weights. • Parameters for Main Mode are obtained using the results of a 2008 TransLink Metro Vancouver telephone survey, with responses broken out by region. • Using these parameters, weighting factors are calculated for each mode. • The original weights are then multiplied by the Main Mode weighting factor to obtain the final weights (a sample row for Burnaby/New Westminster is shown below). • The second weights slightly offset the initial corrections, but because of the over- representation of transit users on TransLink Listens, and the under-representation of vehicle users, particularly those whose main mode is to drive alone (SOV), it is an important correction to make when extrapolating to the population of Metro Vancouver. SOV Rideshare Transit Other Burnaby/ New Westminster
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2019 Annual Report
    2019 PORT MOODY HERITAGE SOCIETY ANNUAL REPORT 2019 1 CONTENTS Board of Directors & Staff 2019/2020_____________________________________ 3 President’s Address____________________________________________________________4, 5 Executive Director’s Report___________________________________________________6 2020 BUDGET Operating Revenue_____________________________________________________________7 Operating Expenses____________________________________________________________8, 9 2019 FINANCIAL SUMMARY Review of Financial Statements__________________________________ ________10, 11 Review Engagement Report_________________________________________________12 Statement of Financial Position 1, 2, 3_______________________________ 13, 14, 15 Notes to Financial Statements________________________________________ 16, 17 2019 Statistics____________________________________________________________ 18 Acknowledgements _____________________________________________________________19 A Case Statement________________________________________________________________20 The Museum’s Key Features___________________________________________________21 Our benefits to community Programs_______________________________________22, 23 Our Accomplishments and Plans_____________________________________________24 Contact Information____________________________________________________________25 2 BOARD OF DIRECTORS 2019/2020 President John Grasty Vice President Kirsten Gerllays Treasurer Anthony Sandler Secretary Laura Dick Past President David Ritcey Director Stan Copp Director
    [Show full text]
  • Northwest Transit Exchange 2017
    Northwest UBC Transit Robson Square 800 Robson St. Exchange Vancouver, BC 2017 V6Z 3B7 Come join us for the 2017 Northwest Transit Exchange! The Northwest Transit Exchange is an annual event for transportation network and service planners throughout the West Coast of the US and Canada to come and share their expertise and learn about key and exciting initiatives from other agencies in our region. This year’s event will be hosted by TransLink, Metro Vancouver’s regional transportation agency. The Northwest Transit Exchange will take place over two full-days: Dates: Thursday, October 12th – Friday, October 13th 2017 Registration cost: Free! Travel, Meals, and Accommodations: Individual responsibility, coffee and refreshments provided Location: UBC – Robson Square 800 Robson Street Vancouver, BC V6Z 3B7 Below you’ll see some of the topics we’ll be discussing at this year’s Exchange. We have some speakers already lined up, but we’re also looking for people/agencies to share their expertise in some of the open sessions without presenters. Additionally, if there’s a topic you’re interested in presenting on that already has a speaker listed, please don’t hesitate to contact us anyhow! We’re open to having multiple presenters at each session. Also, if you have a topic/session that you would like to present please contact us and we will be happy to discuss further. The sessions are usually conversational, with a short presentation and then a larger group discussion. It’s a great opportunity to share what your agency is up to for further regional transportation success stories.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Transportation Study from Bunt and Associates
    Burrard Commons, Anmore, BC Transportation Rationale Draft Version 1 Prepared for Gilic Developments Date July 24, 2019 Project No. 04-18-0478 July 24, 2019 04-18-0478 Michael Wei Assistant Project Manager Gilic Developments 600 – 1455 West Georgia Street Vancouver, BC V6G 2T3 Mr. Michael Wei: Re: Burrard Commons Transportation Rationale Per your request, Bunt & Associates has prepared the attached Transportation Rationale for Gilic Development’s OCP Amendment application for their proposed mixed-use development, Burrard Commons, in the Village of Anmore, British Columbia. The report summarizes existing transportation conditions in Anmore in the vicinity of the proposed development, describes the transportation features of the project, provides an estimate of anticipated future traffic, and recommends a number of Transportation Demand Management strategies to mitigate the potential traffic impact of the development. Please contact me at 604.685.6427 or [email protected] if you have any questions or wish to discuss our report in further detail. Yours truly, Bunt & Associates Peter Joyce, MASc, P.Eng. Federico Puscar, MASc, P.Eng. Principal Transportation Engineer cc: Tony Cai, Sam Gu, Maggie Koka, Samira Khayambashi Burrard Commons | Transportation Rationale | July 24, 2019 S:\PROJECTS\PJ\04-18-0478 Ioco Lands 2019\5.0 Deliverables\Draft Report\20190711_04-18-0478_IocoLands2019_RPT_V01.1.docx CORPORATE AUTHORIZATION Prepared By: Federico Puscar, MASc, P.Eng. Bunt & Associates Engineering Ltd. Transportation Engineer 1550-1050 West Pender Street Vancouver, BC V6E 3S7 Canada Reviewed By: Peter Joyce, MASc, P.Eng. Telephone: +1 604 685 6427 Principal Facsimile: +1 604 685 6579 Date: 2019-07-24 Project No. 04-18-0478 Approved By: Enter Name, Accreditation Status: Draft V1 Enter Title Items below only for Final Version.
    [Show full text]
  • Update to Phase One of the 10-Year Vision 2017–2026 INVESTMENT PLAN
    Update to Phase One of the 10-Year Vision 2017–2026 INVESTMENT PLAN JULY 27, 2017 Approved by the TransLink Board of Directors – July 19, 2017 and the Mayors’ Council on Regional Transportation – July 27, 2017 tenyearvision.translink.ca TRANSLINK MAYORS’ COUNCIL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION 2017: Gregor Robertson, Chair Maria Harris Lorraine Cunningham, Chair Mayor, City of Vancouver Director, Electoral Area ‘A’ Janet Austin Linda Hepner, Vice Chair Lois Jackson Larry Beasley Mayor, City of Surrey Mayor, Corporation of Delta Jim Chu Wayne Baldwin John McEwen Sarah Clark Mayor, City of White Rock Mayor, Village of Anmore Murray Dinwoodie John Becker Greg Moore Anne Giardini Mayor, City of Pitt Meadows Mayor, City of Port Coquitlam Tony Gugliotta Malcolm Brodie Darrell Mussatto Linda Hepner Mayor, City of Richmond Mayor, City of North Vancouver Gregor Robertson Karl Buhr Nicole Read Marcella Szel Mayor, Village of Lions Bay Mayor, District of Maple Ridge Mike Clay Ted Schaffer 2016: Mayor, City of Port Moody Mayor, City of Langley Don Rose, Chair Derek Corrigan Murray Skeels Larry Beasley Mayor, City of Burnaby Mayor, Bowen Island Municipality Jim Chu Jonathan Coté Michael Smith Lorraine Cunningham Mayor, City of New Westminster Mayor, District of West Vancouver Murray Dinwoodie Ralph Drew Richard Stewart Brenda Eaton Mayor, Village of Belcarra Mayor, City of Coquitlam Barry Forbes Jack Froese Richard Walton Tony Gugliotta Mayor, Township of Langley Mayor, District of North Vancouver Linda Hepner Bryce Williams Gregor Robertson Chief, Tsawwassen First Nation Marcella Szel For the purpose of the South Coast British Columbia Transportation Authority Act, this document constitutes the investment plan for the 2017-2026 period.
    [Show full text]
  • BBY NW P.1-44.Indd
    BBY/NW 1-A BBY/NW 1-B Fare Information Effective September 6, 2010 Subject to adjustments. www.translink.ca Regular Fares • In effect Monday through Friday, from start of service to 6:30 pm. During this time, the fare system is divided into three zones, and you Bus Timetable pay according to the number of zones you travel in. Multilingual schedule Discount fares • One zone fare in effect after 6:30 pm, Monday through Friday, and all Horaire multilingue day Saturday, Sunday and Holidays. 兿Ẋ㦍ࠥ।ʳڍ Proof of Payment/Transfer ጟ፿ߢழၴ।ʳڍ Proof of payment/transfer is a valid transfer, ticket vending machine • receipt, validated FareSaver ticket or transit pass. • When you pay cash, ask for a proof of payment/transfer when you bhuBwSI smW sUcI fi rst board. • A proof of payment/transfer is valid for 90 minutes in any direction within applicable zones. Retain for further use or inspection. Burnaby Travelling by Bus • Exact coin fare only - fareboxes do not accept bills or make change. New Westminster Deposit cash in the farebox and obtain a transfer, or insert FareSaver proof of payment/transfer in the farebox for validation. Travelling on SkyTrain and SeaBus • Cash Fare: Purchase a ticket or DayPass (valid for current date) from ticket vending machine in the terminal or station. • FareSaver: On fi rst use, validate in blue validator box in terminal or station. Pass, transfer or previously validated FareSaver: ensure valid date, time zone(s) and conditions. CASH FARES Zone Adult *Concession Regular Fares Zone 1 $2.50 $1.75 (Weekdays from start of service
    [Show full text]
  • Customer Service Performance September 2016 West Coast Express
    Customer Service Performance September 2016 West Coast Express © Synovate Table Of Contents Highlights and Recommendations 3 Project Objectives 8 Methodology 9 Detailed Findings 12 WCE Performance 12 Trends in Transit Usage Among WCE Riders 22 Trends in WCE Usage 29 Customer Profiles 36 APPENDICES Appendix A – Survey Instrument 2 Highlights and Recommendations The revised West Coast Express Customer Service Performance Survey was launched in March 2003. The survey was redesigned to focus solely on the aspects of service that are most positively correlated with system performance ratings from customers. In addition, the redesigned survey implements the Transportation Research Board’s Impact Score Method to identify and prioritize those service attributes that are most negatively impacting the largest number of customers. This will assist in the prioritization of service improvements. 3 Highlights and Recommendations • Performance ratings of WCE’s Overall Service have fully recovered from the dip observed in 2015, presently earning good-to-excellent ratings from a large majority of WCE riders (85%, versus 71% last September), and an average score of 8.6 out of 10. This strong overall performance is largely attributed to the improvements seen in most of the specific service attributes. • Similar to previous waves, WCE is rated highly by at least nine-in-ten WCE riders for having clean vehicles and stations; having courteous, competent and helpful staff; feeling safe from crime on-board and at the station; and having safe equipment. • Overcrowding is becoming a more noticeable issue this period, with good-to-excellent scores for that attribute trending down over the past 2 years (from 66% in September 2014 to 55% presently).
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Obligations
    EVERGREEN LINE RAPID TRANSIT PROJECT Execution PROJECT AGREEMENT SCHEDULE 5: ENVIRONMENTAL OBLIGATIONS SCHEDULE 5 ENVIRONMENTAL OBLIGATIONS PART 1 DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................................. 1 PART 2 PRIMARY CONTRACTOR’S ENVIRONMENTAL OBLIGATIONS ................................ 2 2.1 Primary Contractor’s Environmental Obligations ............................................................... 2 2.2 Environmental Impacts, Changes to Environmental Assessment Certificate and Impacts to Federal Exclusion Determination .................................................................................... 3 2.3 Environmental Reference Documents ................................................................................. 4 2.4 Best Management Practices ................................................................................................ 6 2.5 Environmental Permits ........................................................................................................ 6 2.6 Fisheries Authorization ....................................................................................................... 6 2.7 Inquiries to Environmental Authorities ............................................................................... 8 2.8 Environmental Records ....................................................................................................... 8 2.9 Performance Measures .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Spring & Summer 2010
    spring & summer 2010 burnaby.ca/active message from commission burnaby parks, recreation & culture commission Spring. Just the word alone has a bounce to it, an immediate sense of renewal Commission Meetings and fresh starts. And if you’re a golfer, the bounce of spring is the sight of a The Commission meets once a month, generally on small, white, dimpled ball landing on a fresh green carpet of grass (and, if you’re the third Wednesday, in the City Hall council chambers lucky, rolling right into the cup with a satisfying clunk). at 7pm. During commission meetings, which are For Burnaby golfers anticipating a new season of bounces, breaks and birdies, open to the public, public delegations are heard, there’s even more than the usual reason for cheer. At Burnaby Mountain, help correspondence is received and reports are presented us celebrate the opening of a brand-new, two-tiered, 60-stall driving range and by staff. Members then discuss the issues raised, debate expanded teaching facility (stay tuned for news about the spring opening!). With and vote. We extend a sincere invitation for you to get a fresh modern design concept, this 24,000-square-foot expansion will keep up involved in your community by attending a meeting. with ever-increasing demand for driving range space and allow our pros to offer For more information, please call 604-294-7115. even more advanced instruction areas. Community Over at Riverway Golf Course, plans are underway for an 11,500-square-foot Commission Meetings clubhouse with views of the championship course’s attractive water features.
    [Show full text]
  • Order in Council 399/1999
    PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA ORDER OF THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR IN COUNCIL Order in Council No. 399 , Approved and Ordered Lieutenant Governor Executive Council Chambers, Victoria On the recommendation of the undersigned, the Lieutenant Governor, by and with the advice and consent of the Executive Council, orders that, effective March 31, 1999. (1) The assets and portions of assets described in Schedule I are excluded from the assets of BC Transit that become the assets of the authority under section 38 (2) (a) of the Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority Act. (2) Nothing in subsection (1) precludes the assets and portions of assets described in Schedule 2 from becoming assets of the authority under section 38 (2) (a) of the Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority Act. 2 The liabilities and portions of liabilities described in Schedule 3 are excluded from the liabilities of BC Transit that become the liabilities of the authority under section 38 (2) (a) of the Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority Act and from which BC Transit is released under section 38 (2) (h) of that Act. 3 The authority is granted a lease, for a nominal rental, to use, operate and generate revenues from the assets and portions of assets of BC Transit that are specified in paragraphs (a), (b) and (d) of Schedule 1 except for (a) those assets and portions of assets described in Schedule 2, and (h) those assets and portions of assets described in Schedule 4. 4 The terms and conditions applicable to the lease referred to in section 3 of this order are described in Schedule 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Evergreen Line Rapid Transit Project PRELIMINARY DESIGN CONSULTATION SUMMARY REPORT DECEMBER 2009
    Summary Report Preliminary Design Consultation Preliminary Design Evergreen Line Rapid Transit Project PRELIMINARY DESIGN CONSULTATION SUMMARY REPORT DECEMBER 2009 Prepared by: Kirk & Co. Consulting Ltd. www.kirkandco.ca Synovate Ltd. Summary Report Kirk & Co. Consulting Ltd. is recognized as an industry leader in designing and Preliminary Design Consultation implementing comprehensive public and stakeholder consultation programs. Utilizing best practices in consultation, the firm designs consultation programs to maximize opportunities for input. Kirk & Co. works with polling firms to independently analyze and report on large volumes of public and stakeholder input. Synovate Ltd. is an internationally recognized market research firm. All consultation input received by feedback form and written submission was independently verified and analyzed by Synovate. Participants self-selected into consultation rather than being selected randomly. Consultation feedback is not comparable to an opinion poll because respondents do not constitute a random sample. The views represented in this report reflect the priorities and concerns of consultation participants. They may not be representative of the views of the communities along the Evergreen Line and other stakeholders because participants self-selected into Preliminary Design Consultation. Although results are presented in the form of percentages, there are no margins of error for this data because there is no probability sample. The sample in question is based on self-selection, for which a sampling error cannot be measured. Evergreen Line Rapid Transit Project Preliminary Design Consultation Summary Report Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Project Overview 1 1.2 Purpose of the Evergreen Line 2 1.3 Multi-Round Consultation Process 2 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Acknowledgement
    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This Economic Profile was originally produced by the Chamber of Commerce Serving Coquitlam, Port Coquitlam and Port Moody under the direction of the Chamber's Economic Development Committee in 1986 and has since been updated several times. The funding for the Economic Profile was provided in part by the local Municipalities and the Chamber of Commerce. We would like to recognize the following groups or individuals for their assistance; this profile would not have been possible without: The City of Coquitlam The City of Port Coquitlam The City of Port Moody Metro Vancouver The Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver Fraser Health (Simon Fraser Health Unit) Organizations that contributed a tremendous amount of assistance and information were: The Metro Vancouver Strategic Planning Dept. Statistics Canada Fraser Health (Simon Fraser Health Unit) The Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver Coquitlam City Planning Port Moody Planning Port Coquitlam City Planning The Province of British Columbia Tri-Cities Welcoming Communities For a project of this nature, there are many organizations and individuals who, at some point in the process, take time to assist in bringing the Profile together, but who go unmentioned simply because of the constraints of space and because they are so great in number. To those people and organizations, the Chamber of Commerce extends its appreciation for their work and effort toward a job well done. Much of the statistical information in the Economic Profile is obtained from Statistics Canada’s 2016 Census. We work very hard to verify all the published statistics but absolute accuracy cannot be guaranteed due to the multiple sources accessed.
    [Show full text]
  • Townhouse Development Opportunity Development Permit Approved
    Colliers International 200 Granville Street | 19th Floor Vancouver, BC | V6C 2R6 604 681 4111 SOLD TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPROVED 2317 Saint Johns Street, Port Moody BC CASEY WEEKS MORGAN IANNONE CASEY WEEKS MORGAN IANNONE Personal Real Estate Corporation Personal Real Estate Corporation Personal Real Estate Corporation Personal Real Estate Corporation Colliers International Senior Vice President Vice President Senior Vice President Vice President 200 Granville Street | 19th Floor 604 661 0811 604 662 2654 604 661 0811 604 662 2654 Vancouver, BC | V6C 2R6 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 604 681 4111 2317 Saint Johns Street DEVELOPMENT PLAN Port Moody | BC CIVIC ADDRESS 2317 Saint Johns Street, Port Moody V3H 2A9 No. of Stories 3 Port Moody Building 1: 30 Ft Height Lot A, Block 1, Plan EPP75649, District Lot 202, Building 2: 26 Ft LEGAL DESCRIPTION Neighbourhood Group 1, New Westminster Land District FSR 0.86 Located at the gateway of Port Moody along No. of Units 15 the St. Johns Street, the area is renowned for its PID 030-275-776 beauty and scenic views of the Burrard Inlet and Parking 2 Per Unit Coastal mountains. Visitor Parking 4 ZONING RS-1 Aside from the waterfront views, Port Moody is also West Setback 28 Ft defined as the ‘City of the Arts’ as it is easily accessible to the Port Moody Station Museum, Port Moody Arts Amenity 798 SF Centre, and Inlet Theatre. With close proximity to the LOCAL AREA PLAN Multi-Family Residential Rocky Point Park, this area brings endless outdoor R.O.W Mid-Block Walkway 2.526 SF activities such as kayaking, canoeing, biking and hiking.
    [Show full text]