DOCSLIB.ORG

GI360™ Resource Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GI360™ Resource Guide GI360™ Resource Guide Science + Insight doctorsdata.com Doctor’s Data, Inc. GI360™ Resource Guide Table of Contents Sample Report Sample Report ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Microbiome Abundance and Diversity Actinobacteria (phylum) ......................................................................................................................................................11 Actinomycetales (order) .......................................................................................................................................................11 Bifidobacterium (genus)......................................................................................................................................................... 11 Bacteroidetes (phylum)......................................................................................................................................................... 12 Alistipes (genus).......................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Bacteroides (genus) ..................................................................................................................................................................12 Bacteroides pectinophilus (species) .................................................................................................................................12 Prevotella (genus).......................................................................................................................................................................13 Parabacteroides (genus).........................................................................................................................................................13 Firmicutes (phylum) ................................................................................................................................................................13 Firmicutes ......................................................................................................................................................................................13 Catenibacterium mitsuokai (species)...............................................................................................................................13 Clostridium (genus)...................................................................................................................................................................13 Clostridium methylpentosum (species) .................................................................................................................... 14 Coprobacillus cateniformis (species) ..........................................................................................................................14 Dialister (genus) .........................................................................................................................................................................14 Dorea (genus) ............................................................................................................................................................................. 14 Eubacterium hallii (species)..................................................................................................................................................14 Eubacterium rectale (species)..............................................................................................................................................14 Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (species).............................................................................................................................14 Lachnospiraceae (family) ...................................................................................................................................................... 15 Lactobacillus (genus)................................................................................................................................................................15 Phascolarctobacterium (genus) ........................................................................................................................................ 15 Ruminococcus (genus) ...........................................................................................................................................................15 Streptococcus (genus) .............................................................................................................................................................15 Veillonella (genus) .....................................................................................................................................................................16 Proteobacteria (phylum) ......................................................................................................................................................16 Proteobacteria ............................................................................................................................................................................16 Enterobacteriaceae (family) ................................................................................................................................................ 16 Escherichia (genus) .................................................................................................................................................................. 16 doctorsdata.com | GI360.com Doctor’s Data, Inc. GI360™ Resource Guide Acinetobacter junii (species) .......................................................................................................................................... 16 Verrucomicrobia (phylum)...................................................................................................................................................17 Akkermansia muciniphila (species) .................................................................................................................................17 Tenericutes (phylum) ............................................................................................................................................................. 17 GI Pathogens Adenoviruses ...............................................................................................................................................................................17 Campylobacter ............................................................................................................................................................................18 Clostridioides difficile ................................................................................................................................................................18 Cryptosporidium .........................................................................................................................................................................18 Entamoeba histolytica .............................................................................................................................................................19 Escherichia coli O157 ...............................................................................................................................................................19 Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) .......................................................................................................................19 Giardia ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 20 Norovirus ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 20 Rotavirus ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 20 Salmonella .....................................................................................................................................................................................20 Shiga Toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) ........................................................................................................ 21 Shigella ............................................................................................................................................................................................21 Vibrio cholerae .............................................................................................................................................................................21 Parasitology, Microscopy Blastocystis spp ...........................................................................................................................................................................22 Dientamoeba fragilis ................................................................................................................................................................22 Endolimax nana ........................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kongre Kitabı
    Book of Abstracts International VETistanbul Group Congress 2014 28-30 April, 2014 Istanbul, Turkey Book of Abstracts www.vetistanbul2014.org International VETistanbul Group Congress 2014 28-30 April 2014 International VETistanbul Group Congress 2014 28-30 April, 2014 Istanbul, Turkey Organizing Committee Prof. Dr. Halil GÜNEŞ, Chair Prof. Dr. Bülent EKİZ Prof. Dr. Ali AYDIN Assoc. Prof. Dr. Serkan İKİZ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Hasret DEMİRCAN YARDİBİ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Gülsün PAZVANT Scientific Committee* Prof. Dr. Kemal AK, Turkey Prof. Dr. Anatoliy ALEXANDROVICH STEKOLNIKOV, Russia Prof. Dr. Bogdan AMINKOV, Bulgaria Prof. Dr. Geno ATASANOV ANGELOV, Bulgaria Prof. Dr. Hajrudin BESIROVIC, Bosnia and Herzegovina Prof. Dr. Nihad FEJZIC, Bosnia and Herzegovina Assoc. Prof. Dr. Plamen GEORGIEV, Bulgaria Prof. Dr. Zehra HAJRULAI MUSLIU, Macedonia Assoc. Prof. Dr. Afrim HAMIDI, Kosovo Prof. Dr. Telman ISKENDEROV, Azerbaijan Prof. Dr. Larisa KARPENKO, Russia Prof. Dr. Ismail KIRSAN, Turkey Prof. Dr. Mihni LYUTSKANOV, Bulgaria Assoc. Prof. Dr. Avni ROBAJ, Kosovo Prof. Dr. Velimir STOJKOVSKI, Macedonia Prof. Dr. Semsir VELIYEV, Azerbaijan *Alphabetically listed by the according to the family name Scientific Secreteria Prof. Dr. Bülent EKİZ, Turkey Dr. Karlo MURATOĞLU, Turkey International VETistanbul Group Congress 2014, 28-30 April, Istanbul, Turkey IV International VETistanbul Group Congress 2014 28-30 April 2014 Dear Respectable Colleagues and Guests, First of all, I greet you all with my heart. Also, I would like to thank you for taking place on our side due to the contribution given to the establishment of VETistanbul Group. Known as, VETistanbul Group was established, under the coordination of Istanbul University, with joint decision of Veterinary Faculty of the University of Sarajevo, Saint Petersburg State Academy of Veterinary Medicine, Stara Zagora Trakia University, Ss.
    [Show full text]
  • Multilayered Horizontal Operon Transfers from Bacteria Reconstruct a Thiamine Salvage Pathway in Yeasts
    Multilayered horizontal operon transfers from bacteria reconstruct a thiamine salvage pathway in yeasts Carla Gonçalvesa and Paula Gonçalvesa,1 aApplied Molecular Biosciences Unit-UCIBIO, Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal Edited by Edward F. DeLong, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, and approved September 22, 2019 (received for review June 14, 2019) Horizontal acquisition of bacterial genes is presently recognized as nisms presumed to have facilitated a transition from bacterial an important contribution to the adaptation and evolution of operon transcription to eukaryotic-style gene expression were eukaryotic genomes. However, the mechanisms underlying ex- proposed, such as gene fusion giving rise to multifunctional pro- pression and consequent selection and fixation of the prokaryotic teins (6, 23, 24), increase in intergenic distances between genes to genes in the new eukaryotic setting are largely unknown. Here we generate room for eukaryotic promoters, and independent tran- show that genes composing the pathway for the synthesis of the scription producing mRNAs with poly(A) tails have been dem- essential vitamin B1 (thiamine) were lost in an ancestor of a yeast onstrated (22). In the best documented study, which concerns a lineage, the Wickerhamiella/Starmerella (W/S) clade, known to bacterial siderophore biosynthesis operon acquired by yeasts be- harbor an unusually large number of genes of alien origin. The longing to the Wickerhamiella/Starmerella (W/S) clade, the bacte- thiamine pathway was subsequently reassembled, at least twice, rial genes acquired as an operon were shown to be functional (22). by multiple HGT events from different bacterial donors involving Thiamine, commonly known as vitamin B1, is essential for all both single genes and entire operons.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    MARCH 2013 • VOLUME 51 • NO. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS PHOTO QUIZ Bacteremia in a Patient with Hepatic Encephalopathy Benjamin H. Hinrichs, Robert C. Jerris, 739 Eileen M. Burd Answer to Photo Quiz Benjamin H. Hinrichs, Robert C. Jerris, 1062–1063 Eileen M. Burd POINT-COUNTERPOINT Quantitative Cultures of Bronchoscopically Obtained Vickie Baselski, J. Stacey Klutts 740–744 Specimens Should Be Performed for Optimal Management of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia BACTERIOLOGY Pan-PCR, a Computational Method for Designing Bacterium- Joy Y. Yang, Shelise Brooks, Jennifer A. 752–758 Typing Assays Based on Whole-Genome Sequence Data Meyer, Robert R. Blakesley, Adrian M. Zelazny, Julia A. Segre, Evan S. Snitkin Identification of Anaerobic Bacteria by Bruker Biotyper Matrix- Bryan H. Schmitt, Scott A. 782–786 Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time of Flight Mass Cunningham, Aaron L. Dailey, Spectrometry with On-Plate Formic Acid Preparation Daniel R. Gustafson, Robin Patel Use of Universal 16S rRNA Gene PCR as a Diagnostic Tool for M. Guembe, M. Marín, P. Martín- 799–804 Venous Access Port-Related Bloodstream Infections Rabadán, A. Echenagusia, F. Camúñez, G. Rodríguez-Rosales, G. Simó, M. Echenagusia, E. Bouza, on behalf of the GEIDI Study Group Rapid Identification of Bacteria and Yeasts from Positive-Blood- Amy Fothergill, Vyjayanti Kasinathan, 805–809 Culture Bottles by Using a Lysis-Filtration Method and Matrix- Jay Hyman, John Walsh, Tim Drake, Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time of Flight Mass Yun F. (Wayne) Wang Spectrum Analysis with the SARAMIS Database Pseudo-Outbreak of Vancomycin-Resistant-Enterococcus Rita M. Gander, Dominick Cavuoti, 810–813 (VRE) Colonization in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Using Adnan Alatoom, Paul Southern, Jr., Spectra VRE Surveillance Medium Debra Grant, Kathleen Salinas, Donna Gaffney, Jennifer MacKenzie, Linda Byrd Changes in Molecular Epidemiology of Streptococcus Bruno Pichon, Shamez N.
    [Show full text]
  • Sequencing of Five Poultry Strains Elucidates Phylogenetic Relationships and Divergence in Virulence Genes in Morganella Morganii
    Preprint: Please note that this article has not completed peer review. Sequencing of five poultry strains elucidates phylogenetic relationships and divergence in virulence genes in Morganella morganii CURRENT STATUS: UNDER REVIEW Nicola Palmieri Veterinarmedizinische Universitat Wien Claudia Hess Veterinarmedizinische Universitat Wien Michael Hess Veterinarmedizinische Universitat Wien Merima Alispahic Veterinarmedizinische Universitat Wien [email protected] Author ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2347-2030 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-21281/v1 SUBJECT AREAS Epigenetics & Genomics KEYWORDS Morganella morganii, poultry, NGS data, MALDI-TOF MS, antimicrobial resistance, virulence genes, phylogeny 1 Abstract Background M. morganii is a bacterium frequently associated with urinary infections in humans. While many human strains are sequenced, only the genomes of few poultry strains are available. Here, we performed a detailed characterization of five highly resistant Morganella morganii strains isolated in association with Escherichia coli from diseased domestic Austrian poultry flocks, namely geese, turkeys and chicken layers. Additionally, we sequenced the genomes of these strains by NGS and analyzed phylogenetic clustering, resistance and virulence genes in the context of host-specificity. Results Two strains were identified to be Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase (ESBL) and one as AmpC beta- lactamases (AMP-C) phenotype, while two were ESBL negative. By integrating the genome sequences of these five poultry strains with all the available M. morganii genomes, we constructed a phylogenetic tree that clearly separates the Morganella genus into two clusters (M1 and M2), which approximately reflect the proposed subspecies classification ( morganii and sibonii ). Additionally, we found no association between phylogenetic structure and host, suggesting interspecies transmission. All five poultry strains contained genes for resistance to aminocoumarins, beta-lactams, colistin, elfamycins, fluoroquinolones, phenicol, rifampin and tetracycline.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnostic Code Descriptions (ICD9)
    INFECTIONS AND PARASITIC DISEASES INTESTINAL AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES (001 – 009.3) 001 CHOLERA 001.0 DUE TO VIBRIO CHOLERAE 001.1 DUE TO VIBRIO CHOLERAE EL TOR 001.9 UNSPECIFIED 002 TYPHOID AND PARATYPHOID FEVERS 002.0 TYPHOID FEVER 002.1 PARATYPHOID FEVER 'A' 002.2 PARATYPHOID FEVER 'B' 002.3 PARATYPHOID FEVER 'C' 002.9 PARATYPHOID FEVER, UNSPECIFIED 003 OTHER SALMONELLA INFECTIONS 003.0 SALMONELLA GASTROENTERITIS 003.1 SALMONELLA SEPTICAEMIA 003.2 LOCALIZED SALMONELLA INFECTIONS 003.8 OTHER 003.9 UNSPECIFIED 004 SHIGELLOSIS 004.0 SHIGELLA DYSENTERIAE 004.1 SHIGELLA FLEXNERI 004.2 SHIGELLA BOYDII 004.3 SHIGELLA SONNEI 004.8 OTHER 004.9 UNSPECIFIED 005 OTHER FOOD POISONING (BACTERIAL) 005.0 STAPHYLOCOCCAL FOOD POISONING 005.1 BOTULISM 005.2 FOOD POISONING DUE TO CLOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS (CL.WELCHII) 005.3 FOOD POISONING DUE TO OTHER CLOSTRIDIA 005.4 FOOD POISONING DUE TO VIBRIO PARAHAEMOLYTICUS 005.8 OTHER BACTERIAL FOOD POISONING 005.9 FOOD POISONING, UNSPECIFIED 006 AMOEBIASIS 006.0 ACUTE AMOEBIC DYSENTERY WITHOUT MENTION OF ABSCESS 006.1 CHRONIC INTESTINAL AMOEBIASIS WITHOUT MENTION OF ABSCESS 006.2 AMOEBIC NONDYSENTERIC COLITIS 006.3 AMOEBIC LIVER ABSCESS 006.4 AMOEBIC LUNG ABSCESS 006.5 AMOEBIC BRAIN ABSCESS 006.6 AMOEBIC SKIN ULCERATION 006.8 AMOEBIC INFECTION OF OTHER SITES 006.9 AMOEBIASIS, UNSPECIFIED 007 OTHER PROTOZOAL INTESTINAL DISEASES 007.0 BALANTIDIASIS 007.1 GIARDIASIS 007.2 COCCIDIOSIS 007.3 INTESTINAL TRICHOMONIASIS 007.8 OTHER PROTOZOAL INTESTINAL DISEASES 007.9 UNSPECIFIED 008 INTESTINAL INFECTIONS DUE TO OTHER ORGANISMS
    [Show full text]
  • A Focus on Protein Glycosylation in Lactobacillus
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review How Sweet Are Our Gut Beneficial Bacteria? A Focus on Protein Glycosylation in Lactobacillus Dimitrios Latousakis and Nathalie Juge * Quadram Institute Bioscience, The Gut Health and Food Safety Institute Strategic Programme, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UA, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-(0)-160-325-5068; Fax: +44-(0)-160-350-7723 Received: 22 November 2017; Accepted: 27 December 2017; Published: 3 January 2018 Abstract: Protein glycosylation is emerging as an important feature in bacteria. Protein glycosylation systems have been reported and studied in many pathogenic bacteria, revealing an important diversity of glycan structures and pathways within and between bacterial species. These systems play key roles in virulence and pathogenicity. More recently, a large number of bacterial proteins have been found to be glycosylated in gut commensal bacteria. We present an overview of bacterial protein glycosylation systems (O- and N-glycosylation) in bacteria, with a focus on glycoproteins from gut commensal bacteria, particularly Lactobacilli. These emerging studies underscore the importance of bacterial protein glycosylation in the interaction of the gut microbiota with the host. Keywords: protein glycosylation; gut commensal bacteria; Lactobacillus; glycoproteins; adhesins; lectins; O-glycosylation; N-glycosylation; probiotics 1. Introduction Protein glycosylation, i.e., the covalent attachment of a carbohydrate moiety onto a protein, is a highly ubiquitous protein modification in nature, and considered to be one of the post-translational modifications (PTM) targeting the most diverse group of proteins [1]. Although it was originally believed to be restricted to eukaryotic systems and later to archaea, it has become apparent nowadays that protein glycosylation is a common feature in all three domains of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Cycle 37 Organism 5
    P.O. Box 131375, Bryanston, 2074 Ground Floor, Block 5 Bryanston Gate, 170 Curzon Road Bryanston, Johannesburg, South Africa www.thistle.co.za Tel: +27 (011) 463 3260 Fax: +27 (011) 463 3036 Fax to Email: + 27 (0) 86-557-2232 e-mail : [email protected] Please read this section first The HPCSA and the Med Tech Society have confirmed that this clinical case study, plus your routine review of your EQA reports from Thistle QA, should be documented as a “Journal Club” activity. This means that you must record those attending for CEU purposes. Thistle will not issue a certificate to cover these activities, nor send out “correct” answers to the CEU questions at the end of this case study. The Thistle QA CEU No is: MT-2015/009. Each attendee should claim THREE CEU points for completing this Quality Control Journal Club exercise, and retain a copy of the relevant Thistle QA Participation Certificate as proof of registration on a Thistle QA EQA. MICROBIOLOGY LEGEND CYCLE 37 ORGANISM 5 Morganella morganii Historical identification Morganella morganii was first described by a British bacteriologist H. de R. Morgan in 1906 as Morgan's bacillus. Morgan isolated the bacterium from stools of infants who were noted to have had "summer diarrhea". Later in 1919, Winslow et al. named Morgan's bacillus, Bacillus morganii. In 1936, though, Rauss renamed B. morganii as Proteus morganii. Fulton, in 1943, showed that B. columbensis and P. morganii were the same and defined the genus Morganella, due to the DNA-DNA hybridization. However in 1962, a review article by Ewing reported that M.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2014/134709 Al 12 September 2014 (12.09.2014) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2014/134709 Al 12 September 2014 (12.09.2014) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every A61K 31/05 (2006.01) A61P 31/02 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, (21) International Application Number: BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, PCT/CA20 14/000 174 DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, (22) International Filing Date: HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, 4 March 2014 (04.03.2014) KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, (25) Filing Language: English OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, (26) Publication Language: English SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, (30) Priority Data: ZW. 13/790,91 1 8 March 2013 (08.03.2013) US (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (71) Applicant: LABORATOIRE M2 [CA/CA]; 4005-A, rue kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, de la Garlock, Sherbrooke, Quebec J1L 1W9 (CA). GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, TJ, (72) Inventors: LEMIRE, Gaetan; 6505, rue de la fougere, TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, Sherbrooke, Quebec JIN 3W3 (CA).
    [Show full text]
  • Uncommon Pathogens Causing Hospital-Acquired Infections in Postoperative Cardiac Surgical Patients
    Published online: 2020-03-06 THIEME Review Article 89 Uncommon Pathogens Causing Hospital-Acquired Infections in Postoperative Cardiac Surgical Patients Manoj Kumar Sahu1 Netto George2 Neha Rastogi2 Chalatti Bipin1 Sarvesh Pal Singh1 1Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, CN Centre, All Address for correspondence Manoj K Sahu, MD, DNB, Department India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, CTVS office, 7th floor, CN 2Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi-110029, Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India India (e-mail: [email protected]). J Card Crit Care 2020;3:89–96 Abstract Bacterial infections are common causes of sepsis in the intensive care units. However, usually a finite number of Gram-negative bacteria cause sepsis (mostly according to the hospital flora). Some organisms such as Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus are relatively common. Others such as Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Chryseobacterium indologenes, Shewanella putrefaciens, Ralstonia pickettii, Providencia, Morganella species, Nocardia, Elizabethkingia, Proteus, and Burkholderia are rare but of immense importance to public health, in view of the high mortality rates these are associated with. Being aware of these organisms, as the cause of hospital-acquired infections, helps in the prevention, Keywords treatment, and control of sepsis in the high-risk cardiac surgical patients including in ► uncommon pathogens heart transplants. Therefore, a basic understanding of when to suspect these organ- ► hospital-acquired isms is important for clinical diagnosis and initiating therapeutic options. This review infection discusses some rarely appearing pathogens in our intensive care unit with respect to ► cardiac surgical the spectrum of infections, and various antibiotics that were effective in managing intensive care unit these bacteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhinoscleroma in an Immigrant from Egypt: a Case Report
    387 BRIEF COMMUNICATION Rhinoscleroma in an Immigrant From Egypt: A Case Report Edgardo Bonacina, MD,∗ Leonardo Chianura, MD, DTM&H,† Maurizio Sberna, MD,‡ Giuseppe Ortisi, MD,§ Giovanna Gelosa, MD,|| Alberto Citterio, MD,‡ Giovanni Gesu, MD,§ and Massimo Puoti, MD† Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jtm/article/19/6/387/1795562 by guest on 23 September 2021 Departments of ∗Pathological Anatomy; †Infectious Diseases; ‡Neuroradiology; §Microbiology, and; ||Otorinolaringoiatry, Niguarda Ca` Granda Hospital, Milano, Italy DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8305.2012.00659.x Rhinoscleroma is a chronic indolent granulomatous infection of the nose and the upper respiratory tract caused by Klebsiella rhinoscleromatis; this condition is endemic to many regions of the world including North Africa. We present a case of rhinoscleroma in a 51-year-old Egyptian immigrant with 1-month history of epistaxis. We would postulate that with increased travel from areas where rhinoscleroma is endemic to other non-endemic areas, diagnosis of this condition will become more common. hough rarely observed, rhinoscleroma has to be nasal fossae and ethmoid sinuses with complete bony T taken into consideration in travelers returning destruction of bilateral nasal turbinates (Figure 1). with ear, nose, and throat presentations, particularly Endoscopic biopsy was performed under local anesthe- after traveling to developing countries or regions where sia. Histopathologic examination revealed numerous this condition is endemic.1,2 foamy macrophages (Mikulicz cells) containing bacteria (Figure 2); no fungal hyphae were found.3 Staphylococcus Case Report aureus and Klebsiella rhinoscleromatis were isolated by culture of the tissue biopsy. A diagnosis of rhinoscle- A 51-year-old Egyptian male immigrant presented on roma was made.
    [Show full text]
  • Genomics of Helicobacter Species 91
    Genomics of Helicobacter Species 91 6 Genomics of Helicobacter Species Zhongming Ge and David B. Schauer Summary Helicobacter pylori was the first bacterial species to have the genome of two independent strains completely sequenced. Infection with this pathogen, which may be the most frequent bacterial infec- tion of humanity, causes peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer. Other Helicobacter species are emerging as causes of infection, inflammation, and cancer in the intestine, liver, and biliary tract, although the true prevalence of these enterohepatic Helicobacter species in humans is not yet known. The murine pathogen Helicobacter hepaticus was the first enterohepatic Helicobacter species to have its genome completely sequenced. Here, we consider functional genomics of the genus Helico- bacter, the comparative genomics of the genus Helicobacter, and the related genera Campylobacter and Wolinella. Key Words: Cytotoxin-associated gene; H-Proteobacteria; gastric cancer; genomic evolution; genomic island; hepatobiliary; peptic ulcer disease; type IV secretion system. 1. Introduction The genus Helicobacter belongs to the family Helicobacteriaceae, order Campylo- bacterales, and class H-Proteobacteria, which is also known as the H subdivision of the phylum Proteobacteria. The H-Proteobacteria comprise of a relatively small and recently recognized line of descent within this extremely large and phenotypically diverse phy- lum. Other genera that colonize and/or infect humans and animals include Campylobac- ter, Arcobacter, and Wolinella. These organisms are all microaerophilic, chemoorgano- trophic, nonsaccharolytic, spiral shaped or curved, and motile with a corkscrew-like motion by means of polar flagella. Increasingly, free living H-Proteobacteria are being recognized in a wide range of environmental niches, including seawater, marine sedi- ments, deep-sea hydrothermal vents, and even as symbionts of shrimp and tubeworms in these environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Material S1.Pdf
    Phylogeny of Selenophosphate synthetases (SPS) Supplementary Material S1 ! SelD in prokaryotes! ! ! SelD gene finding in sequenced prokaryotes! We downloaded a total of 8263 prokaryotic genomes from NCBI (see Supplementary Material S7). We scanned them with the program selenoprofiles (Mariotti 2010, http:// big.crg.cat/services/selenoprofiles) using two SPS-family profiles, one prokaryotic (seld) and one mixed eukaryotic-prokaryotic (SPS). Selenoprofiles removes overlapping predictions from different profiles, keeping only the prediction from the profile that seems closer to the candidate sequence. As expected, the great majority of output predictions in prokaryotic genomes were from the seld profile. We will refer to the prokaryotic SPS/SelD !genes as SelD, following the most common nomenclature in literature.! To be able to inspect results by hand, and also to focus on good-quality genomes, we considered a reduced set of species. We took the prok_reference_genomes.txt list from ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/GENOME_REPORTS/, which NCBI claims to be a "small curated subset of really good and scientifically important prokaryotic genomes". We named this the prokaryotic reference set (223 species - see Supplementary Material S8). We manually curated most of the analysis in this set, while we kept automatized the !analysis on the full set.! We detected SelD proteins in 58 genomes (26.0%) in the prokaryotic reference set (figure 1 in main paper), which become 2805 (33.9%) when considering the prokaryotic full set (figure SM1.1). The difference in proportion between the two sets is due largely to the presence of genomes of very close strains in the full set, which we consider redundant.
    [Show full text]