Why Do Liberals Hate
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Identity Evropa
AGAINST IDENTITY EVROPA AGAINST THE ALT RIGHT Big Nazi On Campus May 15, 2016 ON FRIDAY, May 6th, white nationalist Richard Spencer, President and director of National Policy Institute (NPI), (a think tank aimed at mil- lennials and educated adults that puts on conferences), and head of its publishing arm Washington Summit Publishers, arrived just before 3pm at UC Berkeley. Encircled by three other white nationalists, Spen- cer walked from the street through several corridors and hallways until finally making his way to Sproul Plaza where a group of other supporters had already gathered and started to live-stream and hold signs. In doing so, Spencer was stepping out of the world of paid con- ferences and weekly podcasts and into the terrain of street activism. Having announced the event on his twitter 48 hours before hand and working with Red Ice Radio, a live-streaming and in home studio run by a white nationalist married couple, the National Policy Institute along with Identity Europa, the youth wing of the American Freedom Party, (a key organizer for ANP is David Duke’s former right-hand man, Jamie Kelso), a Neo-Nazi formation, was working to create a “virtual rally.” The event itself was billed as a “Safe Space” to talk about race in America, using language common among left-wing, ac- tivist, and anarchist spaces. Before the rally even began, Spencer’s fellow white nationalists at Red Ice were already playing up what they imagined was going to happen that day. “Here is is, the birth of the free speech movement, and all of these liberals aren’t going to be able to stand white people talking about race,” they stated, (as if somehow Further resources Berkeley was devoid of white people doing just that). -
Chapter 4 the Right-Wing Media Enablers of Anti-Islam Propaganda
Chapter 4 The right-wing media enablers of anti-Islam propaganda Spreading anti-Muslim hate in America depends on a well-developed right-wing media echo chamber to amplify a few marginal voices. The think tank misinforma- tion experts and grassroots and religious-right organizations profiled in this report boast a symbiotic relationship with a loosely aligned, ideologically-akin group of right-wing blogs, magazines, radio stations, newspapers, and television news shows to spread their anti-Islam messages and myths. The media outlets, in turn, give members of this network the exposure needed to amplify their message, reach larger audiences, drive fundraising numbers, and grow their membership base. Some well-established conservative media outlets are a key part of this echo cham- ber, mixing coverage of alarmist threats posed by the mere existence of Muslims in America with other news stories. Chief among the media partners are the Fox News empire,1 the influential conservative magazine National Review and its website,2 a host of right-wing radio hosts, The Washington Times newspaper and website,3 and the Christian Broadcasting Network and website.4 They tout Frank Gaffney, David Yerushalmi, Daniel Pipes, Robert Spencer, Steven Emerson, and others as experts, and invite supposedly moderate Muslim and Arabs to endorse bigoted views. In so doing, these media organizations amplify harm- ful, anti-Muslim views to wide audiences. (See box on page 86) In this chapter we profile some of the right-wing media enablers, beginning with the websites, then hate radio, then the television outlets. The websites A network of right-wing websites and blogs are frequently the primary movers of anti-Muslim messages and myths. -
Periodicalspov.Pdf
“Consider the Source” A Resource Guide to Liberal, Conservative and Nonpartisan Periodicals 30 East Lake Street ∙ Chicago, IL 60601 HWC Library – Room 501 312.553.5760 ver heard the saying “consider the source” in response to something that was questioned? Well, the same advice applies to what you read – consider the source. When conducting research, bear in mind that periodicals (journals, magazines, newspapers) may have varying points-of-view, biases, and/or E political leanings. Here are some questions to ask when considering using a periodical source: Is there a bias in the publication or is it non-partisan? Who is the sponsor (publisher or benefactor) of the publication? What is the agenda of the sponsor – to simply share information or to influence social or political change? Some publications have specific political perspectives and outright state what they are, as in Dissent Magazine (self-described as “a magazine of the left”) or National Review’s boost of, “we give you the right view and back it up.” Still, there are other publications that do not clearly state their political leanings; but over time have been deemed as left- or right-leaning based on such factors as the points- of-view of their opinion columnists, the make-up of their editorial staff, and/or their endorsements of politicians. Many newspapers fall into this rather opaque category. A good rule of thumb to use in determining whether a publication is liberal or conservative has been provided by Media Research Center’s L. Brent Bozell III: “if the paper never met a conservative cause it didn’t like, it’s conservative, and if it never met a liberal cause it didn’t like, it’s liberal.” Outlined in the following pages is an annotated listing of publications that have been categorized as conservative, liberal, non-partisan and religious. -
Juliana Geran Pilon Education
JULIANA GERAN PILON [email protected] Dr. Juliana Geran Pilon is Research Professor of Politics and Culture and Earhart Fellow at the Institute of World Politics. For the previous two years, she taught in the Political Science Department at St. Mary’s College of Maryland. From January 1991 to October 2002, she was first Director of Programs, Vice President for Programs, and finally Senior Advisor for Civil Society at the International Foundation for Election Systems (IFES), after three years at the National Forum Foundation, a non-profit institution that focused on foreign policy issues - now part of Freedom House - where she was first Executive Director and then Vice President. At NFF, she assisted in creating a network of several hundred young political activists in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. For the past thirteen years she has also taught at Johns Hopkins University, the Institute of World Politics, George Washington University, and the Institute of World Politics. From 1981 to 1988, she was a Senior Policy Analyst at the Heritage Foundation, writing on the United Nations, Soviet active measures, terrorism, East-West trade, and other international issues. In 1991, she received an Earhart Foundation fellowship for her second book, The Bloody Flag: Post-Communist Nationalism in Eastern Europe -- Spotlight on Romania, published by Transaction, Rutgers University Press. Her autobiographical book Notes From the Other Side of Night was published by Regnery/Gateway, Inc. in 1979, and translated into Romanian in 1993, where it was published by Editura de Vest. A paperback edition appeared in the U.S. in May 1994, published by the University Press of America. -
Conservatism and Pragmatism in Law, Politics and Ethics
TOWARDS PRAGMATIC CONSERVATISM: A REVIEW OF SETH VANNATTA’S CONSERVATISM AND PRAGMATISM IN LAW, POLITICS, AND ETHICS Allen Mendenhall* At some point all writers come across a book they wish they had written. Several such books line my bookcases; the latest of which is Seth Vannatta’s Conservativism and Pragmatism in Law, Politics, and Ethics.1 The two words conservatism and pragmatism circulate widely and with apparent ease, as if their import were immediately clear and uncontroversial. But if you press strangers for concise definitions, you will likely find that the signification of these words differs from person to person.2 Maybe it’s not just that people are unwilling to update their understanding of conservatism and pragmatism—maybe it’s that they cling passionately to their understanding (or misunderstanding), fearing that their operative paradigms and working notions of 20th century history and philosophy will collapse if conservatism and pragmatism differ from some developed expectation or ingrained supposition. I began to immerse myself in pragmatism in graduate school when I discovered that its central tenets aligned rather cleanly with those of Edmund Burke, David Hume, F. A. Hayek, Michael Oakeshott, and Russell Kirk, men widely considered to be on the right end of the political spectrum even if their ideas diverge in key areas.3 In fact, I came to believe that pragmatism reconciled these thinkers, that whatever their marked intellectual differences, these men believed certain things that could be synthesized and organized in terms of pragmatism.4 I reached this conclusion from the same premise adopted by Vannatta: “Conservatism and pragmatism[] . -
The Dark Enlightenment
The Dark Enlightenment Nick Land Part 1: Neo-reactionaries head for the exit March 2, 2012 Enlightenment is not only a state, but an event, and a process. As the designation for an historical episode, concentrated in northern Europe during the 18th century, it is a leading candidate for the ‘true name’ of modernity, capturing its origin and essence (‘Renaissance’ and ‘Industrial Revolution’ are others). Between ‘enlightenment’ and ‘progressive enlightenment’ there is only an elusive difference, because illumination takes time – and feeds on itself, because enlightenment is self-confirming, its revelations ‘self-evident’, and because a retrograde, or reactionary, ‘dark enlightenment’ amounts almost to intrinsic contradiction. To become enlightened, in this historical sense, is to recognize, and then to pursue, a guiding light. There were ages of darkness, and then enlightenment came. Clearly, advance has demonstrated itself, offering not only improvement, but also a model. Furthermore, unlike a renaissance, there is no need for an enlightenment to recall what was lost, or to emphasize the attractions of return. The elementary acknowledgement of enlightenment is already Whig history in miniature. Once certain enlightened truths have been found self-evident, there can be no turning back, and conservatism is pre-emptively condemned – predestined — to paradox. F. A. Hayek, who refused to describe himself as a conservative, famously settled instead upon the term ‘Old Whig’, which – like ‘classical liberal’ (or the still more melancholy ‘remnant’) – accepts that progress isn’t what it used to be. What could an Old Whig be, if not a reactionary progressive? And what on earth is that? Of course, plenty of people already think they know what reactionary modernism looks like, and amidst the current collapse back into the 1930s their concerns are only likely to grow. -
The Altering Eye Contemporary International Cinema to Access Digital Resources Including: Blog Posts Videos Online Appendices
Robert Phillip Kolker The Altering Eye Contemporary International Cinema To access digital resources including: blog posts videos online appendices and to purchase copies of this book in: hardback paperback ebook editions Go to: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/8 Open Book Publishers is a non-profit independent initiative. We rely on sales and donations to continue publishing high-quality academic works. Robert Kolker is Emeritus Professor of English at the University of Maryland and Lecturer in Media Studies at the University of Virginia. His works include A Cinema of Loneliness: Penn, Stone, Kubrick, Scorsese, Spielberg Altman; Bernardo Bertolucci; Wim Wenders (with Peter Beicken); Film, Form and Culture; Media Studies: An Introduction; editor of Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho: A Casebook; Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey: New Essays and The Oxford Handbook of Film and Media Studies. http://www.virginia.edu/mediastudies/people/adjunct.html Robert Phillip Kolker THE ALTERING EYE Contemporary International Cinema Revised edition with a new preface and an updated bibliography Cambridge 2009 Published by 40 Devonshire Road, Cambridge, CB1 2BL, United Kingdom http://www.openbookpublishers.com First edition published in 1983 by Oxford University Press. © 2009 Robert Phillip Kolker Some rights are reserved. This book is made available under the Cre- ative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 2.0 UK: England & Wales Licence. This licence allows for copying any part of the work for personal and non-commercial use, providing author -
Livro "Não Com Um Estrondo, Mas Com Um Gemido", De Theodore Dalrymple,Entrevista Do IFE São Paulo Com Anthony Daniel
Livro "Não com um Estrondo, mas com um Gemido", de Theodore Dalrymple As duas melhores vertentes de Theodore Dalrymple reunidas em um único livro: a crítica da classe intelectual e a análise da cultura de massas Em Não com um Estrondo, mas com um Gemido, Theodore Dalrymple dá a medida do declínio cultural e da triste decadência da Grã-Bretanha – com sua burocracia, mentalidade de bem-estar opressiva, juventude sem rumo e a perseguição em nome da democracia e da liberdade. O autor mostra como o terrorismo e o número crescente de minorias muçulmanas mudaram a vida pública na Inglaterra. Registra, também, suas observações incisivas de artistas e ideólogos e, como médico psiquiatra, discorre sobre o tratamento de criminosos e dos mentalmente perturbados, área de seu interesse. O livro é dividido em duas partes: “Artistas e Ideólogos” e “Política e Cultura”. A primeira traz ensaios sobre Samuel Johnson, Arthur Koestler, Henrik Ibsen, J. G. Ballard. A segunda centra-se em patologias sociais britânicas e suas fontes políticas e culturais. O autor discorre também sobre a sensação de declínio do mundo ocidental, especialmente na Grã-Bretanha, sobre multiculturalismo islâmico e terror. Ele considera o crescimento das patologias sociais e o declínio dos padrões cultural, moral e estético britânicos mais abrangentes e alarmantes que processos semelhantes nos Estados Unidos e acredita que as políticas do Estado de bem-estar deram grande contribuição para o surgimento desses fenômenos. Sobre o autor Theodore Dalrymple é um dos pseudônimos de Anthony Daniels, nascido em Londres em 1949. Além de ensaísta, é médico psiquiatra, trabalhou em quatro continentes e atuou até 2005 no Hospital da Cidade e na Winson Green Prison, ambos em Birmingham, Inglaterra. -
An Exploration of Comics and Architecture in Post-War Germany and the United States
An Exploration of Comics and Architecture in Post-War Germany and the United States A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Ryan G. O’Neill IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Dr. Rembert Hueser, Adviser October 2016 © Ryan Gene O’Neill 2016 Table of Contents List of Figures……………………………………………………………………………………...……….i Prologue……………………………………………………………………………………….....…1 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………...8 Chapter 1: The Comic Laboratory…………………………………………………...…………………………………….31 Chapter 2: Comics and Visible Time…………………………………………………………………………...…………………..52 Chapter 3: Comic Cities and Comic Empires………………………………...……………………………...……..…………………….80 Chapter 4: In the Shadow of No Archive…………………………………………………………………………..…….…………114 Epilogue: The Painting that Ate Paris………………………………………………………………………………...…………….139 Works Cited…..……………………………………………………………………………..……152 i Figures Prologue Figure 1: Kaczynski, Tom (w)(a). “Skyway Sleepless.” Twin Cities Noir: The Expanded Edition. Ed. Julie Schaper, Steven Horwitz. New York: Akashic Books, 2013. Print. Figure 2: Kaczynski, Tom (w)(a). “Skyway Sleepless.” Twin Cities Noir: The Expanded Edition. Ed. Julie Schaper, Steven Horwitz. New York: Akashic Books, 2013. Print. Figure 3: Image of Vitra Feuerwehrhaus Uncredited. https://www.vitra.com/de-de/campus/architecture/architecture-fire-station Figure 4: Kaczynski, Tom (w)(a). “Skyway Sleepless.” Twin Cities Noir: The Expanded Edition. Ed. Julie Schaper, Steven Horwitz. New York: Akashic Books, 2013. Print. Introduction Figure 1: Goscinny, René (w), Alberto Uderzo (i). Die Trabantenstadt. trans. Gudrun Penndorf. Stuttgart: Ehapa Verlag GmbH, 1974. Pp.28-29. Print. Figure 2: Forum at Pompeii, Vitruvius Vitrubius. The Ten Books on Architecture. trans. Morris Hicky Morgan, Ph.D., LL.D. Illustrations under the direction of Herbert Langford Warren, A.M. pp. 132. Print. Figure 3: Töpffer, Rodolphe. -
Allens Arthur Robinson
Our Culture, What's Left of It: The Mandarins and the Masses Theodore Dalrymple Ivan R. Dee, Publisher (May 25, 2005) ISBN: 1566636434 320pp US$27.50 Only man placed values in things to preserve himself—he alone created a meaning for things, a human meaning. Therefore he calls himself ‘man’, which means: the esteemer… Through esteeming alone is there value: and without esteeming, the nut of existence would be hollow. Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra In an age of non-judgementalism, Theodore Dalrymple is the most eloquent of heretics. Writing under his mildly pompous yet endearing nom de plume, British psychiatrist and prison doctor Anthony Daniels continues to puncture the post-modern pretensions of Britain's politically correct elites. His latest anthology, drawn from the Manhattan Institute's City Journal, surpasses its predecessor, Life at the Bottom, in its sparkling erudition and underlying humanity. The first half of the volume is devoted to Western literature and art, charting their decline into a charmless celebration of vulgarity and sensationalism. For this phenomenon, Dalrymple blames the liberal intelligentsia's embrace of cultural relativism and aversion to value judgements. He explains how narcissistic liberals of the artistic and literary world, driven by a desire to appear virtuously open-minded, praise disingenuously the most sordid and degraded aspects of slum culture as triumphant declarations of non-conformity and working class authenticity. Thus, in Dalrymple's view, have they condemned the British underclass to continued economic, social and intellectual deprivation by destroying its sense of aspiration. The barren wasteland of modern British culture is compared unfavourably with its former depth and vibrancy, a theme illustrated by Dalrymple's application of Shakespeare to the modern world, which demonstrates the timeless nature of the Bard's works. -
The Weekly Standard…Don’T Settle for Less
“THE ORACLE OF AMERICAN POLITICS” — Wolf Blitzer, CNN …don’t settle for less. POSITIONING STATEMENT The Weekly Standard…don’t settle for less. Through original reporting and prose known for its boldness and wit, The Weekly Standard and weeklystandard.com serve an audience of more than 3.2 million readers each month. First-rate writers compose timely articles and features on politics and elections, defense and foreign policy, domestic policy and the courts, books, art and culture. Readers whose primary common interests are the political developments of the day value the critical thinking, rigorous thought, challenging ideas and compelling solutions presented in The Weekly Standard print and online. …don’t settle for less. EDITORIAL: CONTENT PROFILE The Weekly Standard: an informed perspective on news and issues. 18% Defense and 24% Foreign Policy Books and Arts 30% Politics and 28% Elections Domestic Policy and the Courts The value to The Weekly Standard reader is the sum of the parts, the interesting mix of content, the variety of topics, type of writers and topics covered. There is such a breadth of content from topical pieces to cultural commentary. Bill Kristol, Editor …don’t settle for less. EDITORIAL: WRITERS Who writes matters: outstanding political writers with a compelling point of view. William Kristol, Editor Supreme Court and the White House for the Star before moving to the Baltimore Sun, where he was the national In 1995, together with Fred Barnes and political correspondent. From 1985 to 1995, he was John Podhoretz, William Kristol founded a senior editor and White House correspondent for The new magazine of politics and culture New Republic. -
DIAGNOSIS by Regina E. Herzlinger What, Precisely, Is Wrong with the American Health-Care System?
2009_5_25UPC.qxp 5/5/2009 5:45 PM Page 1 May 25, 2009 49145 $3.95 JACK Special Health-Care Issue KEMP, R.I.P. The Doctor Will See You . Eventually MICHAEL F. CANNON JAMES C. CAPRETTA $3.95 JOHN C. GOODMAN REGINA E. HERZLINGER 21 RAMESH PONNURU 0 74851 08155 6 www.nationalreview.com base.qxp 5/5/2009 8:35 PM Page 1 Our way out of the energy fix: an energy mix. It’s going to take a combination of hydrocarbons, low carbons and energy efficiency to build a more secure and sustainable energy future. As the largest contributor to U.S. energy development, BP has invested over $40 billion inthe last 5 years in oil and gas, aswell as alternatives like wind, solar and biofuels. For example, BP is working with Verenium to accelerate the development of advanced biofuelsfor U.S. motorists. Learn more about America’s most diverse energy portfolio at bp.com/us. beyond p etroleum® © 2009 BP Products North America Inc. toc.qxp 5/6/2009 12:45 PM Page 1 Contents MAY 25, 2009 | VOLUME LXI, NO. 9 | www.nationalreview.com ON THE COVER Diagnosis Page 26 It is critical that we fully understand the health-care problems we are trying to address—before we act. Amir Taheri on Iran . p. 38 Health care accounts for roughly one-sixth of the BOOKS, ARTS nation’s economic output, & MANNERS and political intervention in this sensitive sector will 44 IS THERE AN inevitably be accompanied AMERICAN MIND? Allen C. Guelzo challenges the by unintended consequences idea of American mindlessness.