DOCSLIB.ORG

Teap-Qpstf-October2009.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Teap-Qpstf-October2009.Pdf MONTREAL PROTOCOL ON SUBSTANCES THAT DEPLETE THE OZONE LAYER UNEP REPORT OF THE TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT PANEL QUARANTINE AND PRESHIPMENT TASKFORCE – FINAL REPORT OCTOBER 2009 UNEP OCTOBER 2009 REPORT OF THE TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT PANEL QUARANTINE AND PRESHIPMENT TASKFORCE FINAL REPORT October 2009 TEAP Quarantine and Preshipment Taskforce Finl Report iii Montreal Protocol On Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer Report of the UNEP Technology and Economic Assessment Panel Quarantine and Preshipment Taskforce - Final Report October 2009 The text of this report is composed mainly in Times New Roman. Composition of the Report: Quarantine and Presipment Task Force Coordination: Marta Pizano, Jonathan Banks, QPS Task Force Co- Chairs Final editing and layout: Marta Pizano Reproduction: UNEP/ Ozone Secretariat, Nairobi Date: October 5 2009 Under certain conditions, printed copies of this report are available from: United Nations Environment Programme Ozone Secretariat P.O. Box 30552 Nairobi, Kenya This document is also available in portable document format from: http://ozone.unep.org/Assessment_Panels/TEAP/Reports/ No copyright involved. This publication may be freely copied, abstracted and cited, with acknowledgement of the source of the material. Task Force membership Co-Chairs: Marta Pizano (Colombia); Jonathan Banks (Australia) Members: Ken Glassey (New Zealand); Takashi Misumi (Japan); David Okioga (Kenya); Ken Vick (USA); Eduardo Wellink (Argentina); Tom Batchelor (Belgium); Ian Porter (Australia); Wang Yuejin (PRC). iv October 2009 TEAP Quarantine and Preshipment Taskforce Final Report UNEP OCTOBER 2009 REPORT OF THE TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT PANEL QUARANTINE AND PRESHIPMENT TASK FORCE FINAL REPORT Common Acronyms 1,3-D 1,3-dichloropropene A5 Article 5 Party CUE Critical Use Exemption CUN Critical Use Nomination EC European Community EPPO European Plant Protection Organisation IPPC International Plant Protection Convention ISPM International Standard Phytosanitary Measure MB Methyl Bromide MBTOC Methyl Bromide Technical Options Committee MITC Methylsiocyanate MOP Meeting of the Parties NPPO National Plant Protection Organisation OEWG Open Ended Working Group Pic Chloropicrin QPS Quarantine and Pre-shipment SF Sulfuryl fluoride TEAP Technology and Economic Assessment Panel USA, US United States of America October 2009 TEAP Quarantine and Preshipment Taskforce Final Report v Disclaimer The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the Technology and Economic Assessment Panel (TEAP) Co-chairs and members, the Quarantine and Preshipment Task Force Co-chairs and members, and the companies and organisations that employ them do not endorse the performance, worker safety, or environmental acceptability of any of the technical options discussed. Every industrial and agricultural operation requires consideration of environmental and worker safety and proper disposal of contaminants and waste products. Moreover, as work continues – including additional toxicity evaluation – more information on health, environmental and safety effects of alternatives and replacements will become available for use in selecting among the options discussed in this document. UNEP, the TEAP Co-chairs and members, the Quarantine and Preshipment Task Force Co- chairs and members, in furnishing or distributing this information, do not make any warranty or representation, either express or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or utility; nor do they assume any liability of any kind whatsoever resulting from the use or reliance upon any information, material, or procedure contained herein, including but not limited to any claims regarding health, safety, environmental effect or fate, efficacy, or performance, made by the source of information. Mention of any company, association, or product in this document is for information purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation of any such company, association, or product, either express or implied by UNEP, the Technology and Economic Assessment Panel Co-chairs or members, the Quarantine and Preshipment Task Force or members, or the companies or organisations that employ them. Acknowledgements The Technology and Economic Assessment Panel, its Quarantine and Preshipment Task Force Co-chairs and members acknowledge with thanks the collaboration with the IPPC Secretariat in production of this report and the outstanding contributions from all of the individuals and organisations that provided support to Panel and Committee Co-chairs and members. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the Panel and Committee and do not necessarily reflect the views of any sponsoring or supporting organisation. vi October 2009 TEAP Quarantine and Preshipment Taskforce Final Report 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................1 2 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................5 2.1 MANDATE AND SCOPE OF THE FINAL REPORT ...........................................................................................5 2.1.1. Fulfilment of Decision XX/6 – Process...........................................................................................5 2.1.2. Layout and structure of the report..................................................................................................6 2.1.3. Origin and original intent of the QPS exemption...........................................................................7 2.1.4. Decisions relating to QPS use of methyl bromide..........................................................................9 2.1.5. Quarantine and Pre-shipment - definitions ..................................................................................10 3. PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION................................................................................15 3.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................15 3.1.1. Sources of information – Volumes of MB used for QPS ..............................................................16 3.1.2. Overview of QPS production and consumption ...........................................................................17 3.1.3. Comparison of global production and consumption....................................................................17 3.2. PRODUCTION............................................................................................................................................18 3.2.1. Global Production for QPS Purposes ..........................................................................................18 3.2.2. Production by Party ......................................................................................................................19 3.3. CONSUMPTION .........................................................................................................................................20 3.3.1. Global MB consumption for QPS uses .........................................................................................20 3.3.2. Consumption in non-Article 5 Parties ..........................................................................................22 3.3.3. Consumption in Article 5 Parties..................................................................................................25 3.3.4. Proportions of QPS use covered by IAs and domestic regulations .............................................27 3.4. SUMMARY: PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION ........................................................................................28 3.4.1. Trends by region............................................................................................................................28 3.4.2. Trends globally..............................................................................................................................29 4. REPORTED USES ...................................................................................................................31 4.1. INTRODUCTION AND MANDATE ...............................................................................................................31 4.1.1. Target pests for QPS treatments...................................................................................................31 4.1.2. Examples of key pest listings.........................................................................................................32 4.1.2.1. Key pests - Canada..................................................................................................................32 4.1.2.2. Key pests - Mexico...................................................................................................................34 4.1.2.3. Key pests - Japan......................................................................................................................35 4.1.2.4 Key pests - EC ..........................................................................................................................37 4.2. MAJOR QPS USES AND VOLUMES OF METHYL BROMIDE.........................................................................37 4.2.1. Use by quantity..............................................................................................................................39 4.3. SUMMARY: REPORTED USES...................................................................................................................41
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fauna Lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 Years Later: Changes and Additions
    ©Ges. zur Förderung d. Erforschung von Insektenwanderungen e.V. München, download unter www.zobodat.at Atalanta (August 2000) 31 (1/2):327-367< Würzburg, ISSN 0171-0079 "Fauna lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 years later: changes and additions. Part 5. Noctuidae (Insecto, Lepidoptera) by Vasily V. A n ik in , Sergey A. Sachkov , Va d im V. Z o lo t u h in & A n drey V. Sv ir id o v received 24.II.2000 Summary: 630 species of the Noctuidae are listed for the modern Volgo-Ural fauna. 2 species [Mesapamea hedeni Graeser and Amphidrina amurensis Staudinger ) are noted from Europe for the first time and one more— Nycteola siculana Fuchs —from Russia. 3 species ( Catocala optata Godart , Helicoverpa obsoleta Fabricius , Pseudohadena minuta Pungeler ) are deleted from the list. Supposedly they were either erroneously determinated or incorrect noted from the region under consideration since Eversmann 's work. 289 species are recorded from the re­ gion in addition to Eversmann 's list. This paper is the fifth in a series of publications1 dealing with the composition of the pres­ ent-day fauna of noctuid-moths in the Middle Volga and the south-western Cisurals. This re­ gion comprises the administrative divisions of the Astrakhan, Volgograd, Saratov, Samara, Uljanovsk, Orenburg, Uralsk and Atyraus (= Gurjev) Districts, together with Tataria and Bash­ kiria. As was accepted in the first part of this series, only material reliably labelled, and cover­ ing the last 20 years was used for this study. The main collections are those of the authors: V. A n i k i n (Saratov and Volgograd Districts), S.
    [Show full text]
  • Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry
    Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry A shared responsibility between government and industry Version 3.0 May 2018 Plant Health AUSTRALIA Location: Level 1 1 Phipps Close DEAKIN ACT 2600 Phone: +61 2 6215 7700 Fax: +61 2 6260 4321 E-mail: [email protected] Visit our web site: www.planthealthaustralia.com.au An electronic copy of this plan is available through the email address listed above. © Plant Health Australia Limited 2018 Copyright in this publication is owned by Plant Health Australia Limited, except when content has been provided by other contributors, in which case copyright may be owned by another person. With the exception of any material protected by a trade mark, this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivs 3.0 Australia licence. Any use of this publication, other than as authorised under this licence or copyright law, is prohibited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ - This details the relevant licence conditions, including the full legal code. This licence allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to Plant Health Australia (as below). In referencing this document, the preferred citation is: Plant Health Australia Ltd (2018) Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry (Version 3.0 – 2018) Plant Health Australia, Canberra, ACT. This project has been funded by Hort Innovation, using the vegetable research and development levy and contributions from the Australian Government. Hort Innovation is the grower-owned, not for profit research and development corporation for Australian horticulture Disclaimer: The material contained in this publication is produced for general information only.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA § 319.56–2H
    Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA § 319.56–2h pest conditions on arrival or to assure fect that such garlic is free of living himself of the effectiveness of the stages of Brachycerus spp. and treatment. Dyspessa ulula (Bkh.), said certifi- (c) The entry of cipollini from Mo- cation to be based on field inspection rocco may be made only through the and certification and subsequent reex- ports of New York and Boston at which amination at the port of departure ports facilities for vacuum fumigation prior to exportation. The with methyl bromide, as herein re- phytosanitary certificate to be issued quired, are available. by such official shall show the ship- [24 FR 10788, Dec. 29, 1959. Redesignated at 50 ment to be either initially free from FR 9788, Mar. 12, 1985] these pests or to have been fumigated. (ii) The original copy of the § 319.56–2f [Reserved] phytosanitary certificate shall be at- tached to the manifest accompanying § 319.56–2g Administrative instruc- the shipment. However, with the con- tions prescribing method of treat- sent of the Plant Quarantine inspector, ment of garlic from specified coun- tries. the importer may arrange to have the original phytosanitary certificate (a) Except as otherwise provided in mailed direct to the Inspector in these administrative instructions, fu- Charge, Plant Protection and Quar- migation with methyl bromide in vacu- antine Programs, at the port of entry, um fumigation chambers, in accord- if this will expedite inspection and re- ance with the Plant Protection and lease of certified shipments. If such an Quarantine Treatment Manual, which arrangement is made, a copy of the is incorporated by reference at § 300.1 of phytosanitary certificate shall be at- this chapter, is a condition of entry tached to the manifest accompanying under permit for all shipments of garlic the shipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Alien Invasive Species and International Trade
    Forest Research Institute Alien Invasive Species and International Trade Edited by Hugh Evans and Tomasz Oszako Warsaw 2007 Reviewers: Steve Woodward (University of Aberdeen, School of Biological Sciences, Scotland, UK) François Lefort (University of Applied Science in Lullier, Switzerland) © Copyright by Forest Research Institute, Warsaw 2007 ISBN 978-83-87647-64-3 Description of photographs on the covers: Alder decline in Poland – T. Oszako, Forest Research Institute, Poland ALB Brighton – Forest Research, UK; Anoplophora exit hole (example of wood packaging pathway) – R. Burgess, Forestry Commission, UK Cameraria adult Brussels – P. Roose, Belgium; Cameraria damage medium view – Forest Research, UK; other photographs description inside articles – see Belbahri et al. Language Editor: James Richards Layout: Gra¿yna Szujecka Print: Sowa–Print on Demand www.sowadruk.pl, phone: +48 022 431 81 40 Instytut Badawczy Leœnictwa 05-090 Raszyn, ul. Braci Leœnej 3, phone [+48 22] 715 06 16 e-mail: [email protected] CONTENTS Introduction .......................................6 Part I – EXTENDED ABSTRACTS Thomas Jung, Marla Downing, Markus Blaschke, Thomas Vernon Phytophthora root and collar rot of alders caused by the invasive Phytophthora alni: actual distribution, pathways, and modeled potential distribution in Bavaria ......................10 Tomasz Oszako, Leszek B. Orlikowski, Aleksandra Trzewik, Teresa Orlikowska Studies on the occurrence of Phytophthora ramorum in nurseries, forest stands and garden centers ..........................19 Lassaad Belbahri, Eduardo Moralejo, Gautier Calmin, François Lefort, Jose A. Garcia, Enrique Descals Reports of Phytophthora hedraiandra on Viburnum tinus and Rhododendron catawbiense in Spain ..................26 Leszek B. Orlikowski, Tomasz Oszako The influence of nursery-cultivated plants, as well as cereals, legumes and crucifers, on selected species of Phytophthopra ............30 Lassaad Belbahri, Gautier Calmin, Tomasz Oszako, Eduardo Moralejo, Jose A.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Page Photo
    Эверсманния. Энтомологические исследования Eversmannia в России и соседних регионах. Вып. 9. 20.III.2007: 11–33 No. 9. 2007. Р. В. Яковлев г. Барнаул, Алтайский государственный университет (Южно-Сибирский ботанический сад), Алтайский краевой институт повышения квалификации работников образования Древоточцы (Lepidoptera: Cossidae) России R.V. Yakovlev. Carpenter moths (Lepidoptera: Cossidae) of Russia. SUMMARY. In this article the catalogue of Cossidae of Russia is presented. An annotated list including 32 species has been compiled. Two new species and two new subspecies: Catopta albonubila argunica, ssp. n. (Locus typicus: East Trasbaicalia, Kuenga, 45 km SW. Sretensk), Catopta perunovi, sp. n. (Locus typicus: Russia, Altai Rep., near Ongudai), Cossus cossus dauricus, ssp. n. (Locus typicus: Russia Transbaikalia, Chita Province, Nizhnii Tsasutchei), Phragmataecia pacifica, sp. n. (Locus typicus: Russia, Dagestan, 5 km E. Urma) are described. Besides, a new species from S. Mongolia Catopta saldaitisi, sp. n. (Locus typicus: S. Mongolia, Omnogovi Aimak, the Gobi Altai Mts., Gurvan Sayhan) is described. For each species bibliography and distribution map are given. Проводимая в последние годы работа по исследованию древоточцев (Сossidae) Евразии при- вела к описанию ряда новых таксонов с территории Палеарктики, позволила установить грани- цы распространения многих видов. В данной работе делается попытка представить полный ка- талог древоточцев России, выполненный как на основании анализа литературных данных, так и на большом фактическом материале. Исследованный материал хранится в ряде коллекций Рос- сии, Украины, Германии, Австрии. Приведен аннотированный список видов, включающий дан- ные о первичном описании, синонимии, месте хранения типового материала и распростране- нии. Для редких и малоизвестных видов и для новых таксонов приводятся полные данные эти- кеток. Для каждого вида приведена карта распространения на территории России.
    [Show full text]
  • Autographa Gamma
    1 Table of Contents Table of Contents Authors, Reviewers, Draft Log 4 Introduction to the Reference 6 Soybean Background 11 Arthropods 14 Primary Pests of Soybean (Full Pest Datasheet) 14 Adoretus sinicus ............................................................................................................. 14 Autographa gamma ....................................................................................................... 26 Chrysodeixis chalcites ................................................................................................... 36 Cydia fabivora ................................................................................................................. 49 Diabrotica speciosa ........................................................................................................ 55 Helicoverpa armigera..................................................................................................... 65 Leguminivora glycinivorella .......................................................................................... 80 Mamestra brassicae....................................................................................................... 85 Spodoptera littoralis ....................................................................................................... 94 Spodoptera litura .......................................................................................................... 106 Secondary Pests of Soybean (Truncated Pest Datasheet) 118 Adoxophyes orana ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Jasmonate-Mediated Induced Volatiles in the American Cranberry, Vaccinium Macrocarpon: from Gene Expression to Organismal Interactions
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE published: 29 April 2013 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00115 Jasmonate-mediated induced volatiles in the American cranberry, Vaccinium macrocarpon: from gene expression to organismal interactions Cesar R. Rodriguez-Saona1*, James Polashock 2 and Edi A. Malo3 1 Department of Entomology, Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research, Chatsworth, NJ, USA 2 Genetic Improvement of Fruits and Vegetables Lab, Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Chatsworth, NJ, USA 3 Grupo de Ecología de Artrópodos y Manejo de plagas, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Tapachula, Chiapas, México Edited by: Jasmonates, i.e., jasmonic acid (JA) and methyl jasmonate (MeJA), are signaling hormones Erik Poelman, Wageningen University, that regulate a large number of defense responses in plants which in turn affect the plants’ Netherlands interactions with herbivores and their natural enemies. Here, we investigated the effect Reviewed by: Nicole M. Van Dam, Radboud of jasmonates on the emission of volatiles in the American cranberry, Vaccinium macro- University Nijmegen, Netherlands carpon, at different levels of biological organization from gene expression to organismal Colette Broekgaarden, Wageningen interactions. At the molecular level, four genes (BCS, LLS, NER1, and TPS21) responded University, Netherlands significantly to gypsy moth larval feeding, MeJA, and mechanical wounding, but to dif- *Correspondence: ferent degrees. The most dramatic changes in expression of BCS and TPS21 (genes in Cesar R. Rodriguez-Saona, Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and the sesquiterpenoid pathway) were when treated with MeJA. Gypsy moth-damaged and Cranberry Research, 125A Lake MeJA-treated plants also had significantly elevated expression of LLS and NER1 (genes in Oswego Road, Chatsworth, NJ the monoterpene and homoterpene biosynthesis pathways, respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • Zoogeography of the Holarctic Species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): Importance of the Bering Ian Refuge
    © Entomologica Fennica. 8.XI.l991 Zoogeography of the Holarctic species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): importance of the Bering ian refuge Kauri Mikkola, J, D. Lafontaine & V. S. Kononenko Mikkola, K., Lafontaine, J.D. & Kononenko, V. S. 1991 : Zoogeography of the Holarctic species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): importance of the Beringian refuge. - En to mol. Fennica 2: 157- 173. As a result of published and unpublished revisionary work, literature compi­ lation and expeditions to the Beringian area, 98 species of the Noctuidae are listed as Holarctic and grouped according to their taxonomic and distributional history. Of the 44 species considered to be "naturall y" Holarctic before this study, 27 (61 %) are confirmed as Holarctic; 16 species are added on account of range extensions and 29 because of changes in their taxonomic status; 17 taxa are deleted from the Holarctic list. This brings the total of the group to 72 species. Thirteen species are considered to be introduced by man from Europe, a further eight to have been transported by man in the subtropical areas, and five migrant species, three of them of Neotropical origin, may have been assisted by man. The m~jority of the "naturally" Holarctic species are associated with tundra habitats. The species of dry tundra are frequently endemic to Beringia. In the taiga zone, most Holarctic connections consist of Palaearctic/ Nearctic species pairs. The proportion ofHolarctic species decreases from 100 % in the High Arctic to between 40 and 75 % in Beringia and the northern taiga zone, and from between 10 and 20 % in Newfoundland and Finland to between 2 and 4 % in southern Ontario, Central Europe, Spain and Primorye.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera Recorded for Imperial County California Compiled by Jeffrey Caldwell [email protected] 1-925-949-8696 Note
    Lepidoptera Recorded for Imperial County California Compiled by Jeffrey Caldwell [email protected] 1-925-949-8696 Note: BMNA = Butterflies and Moths of North America web site MPG = Moth Photographers Group web site Most are from the Essig Museum’s California Moth Specimens Database web site Arctiidae. Tiger and Lichen Moths. Apantesis proxima (Notarctia proxima). Mexican Tiger Moth. 8181 [BMNA] Ectypia clio (clio). Clio Tiger Moth. 8249 Estigmene acrea (acrea). Salt Marsh Moth. 8131 Euchaetes zella. 8232 Autostichidae (Deoclonidae). Oegoconia novimundi. Four-spotted Yellowneck Moth. 1134 (Oegoconia quadripuncta mis-applied) Bucculatricidae. Ribbed Cocoon-maker Moths. Bucculatrix enceliae. Brittlebrush Moth. 0546 Cossidae. Goat Moths, Carpenterworm Moths, and Leopard Moths. Comadia henrici. 2679 Givira mucida. 2660 Hypopta palmata. 2656 Prionoxystus robiniae (mixtus). Carpenterworm or Locust Borer. 2693 Depressariidae. Pseudethmia protuberans. 1008 [MPG] Ethmiidae. Now assigned to Depressariidae. Ethmiinae. Ethmia timberlakei. 0984 Pseudethmia protuberans. 1008 Gelechiidae. Twirler Moths. Aristotelia adceanotha. 1726 [Sighting 1019513 BMNA] Chionodes abdominella. 2054 Chionodes dentella. 2071 Chionodes fructuaria. 2078 Chionodes kincaidella. 2086 (reared from Atriplex acanthocarpa in Texas) Chionodes oecus. 2086.2 Chionodes sistrella. 2116 Chionodes xanthophilella. 2125 Faculta inaequalis. Palo Verde Webworm. 2206 Friseria cockerelli. Mesquite Webworm. 1916 Gelechia desiliens. 1938 Isophrictis sabulella. 1701 Keiferia lycopersicella. Tomato Pinworm. 2047 Pectinophora gossypiella. Pink Bollworm. 2261 Prolita puertella. 1895 Prolita veledae. 1903 Geometridae. Inchworm Moths, Loopers, Geometers, or Measuring Worms. Archirhoe neomexicana. 7295 Chesiadodes coniferaria. 6535 Chlorochlamys appellaria. 7073 Cyclophora nanaria. Dwarf Tawny Wave. W 7140 Dichorda illustraria. 7055 Dichordophora phoenix. Phoenix Emerald. 7057 Digrammia colorata. Creosote Moth. 6381 Digrammia irrorata (rubricata). 6395 Digrammia pictipennata. 6372 Digrammia puertata.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects That Feed on Trees and Shrubs
    INSECTS THAT FEED ON COLORADO TREES AND SHRUBS1 Whitney Cranshaw David Leatherman Boris Kondratieff Bulletin 506A TABLE OF CONTENTS DEFOLIATORS .................................................... 8 Leaf Feeding Caterpillars .............................................. 8 Cecropia Moth ................................................ 8 Polyphemus Moth ............................................. 9 Nevada Buck Moth ............................................. 9 Pandora Moth ............................................... 10 Io Moth .................................................... 10 Fall Webworm ............................................... 11 Tiger Moth ................................................. 12 American Dagger Moth ......................................... 13 Redhumped Caterpillar ......................................... 13 Achemon Sphinx ............................................. 14 Table 1. Common sphinx moths of Colorado .......................... 14 Douglas-fir Tussock Moth ....................................... 15 1. Whitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University Cooperative Extension etnomologist and associate professor, entomology; David Leatherman, entomologist, Colorado State Forest Service; Boris Kondratieff, associate professor, entomology. 8/93. ©Colorado State University Cooperative Extension. 1994. For more information, contact your county Cooperative Extension office. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture,
    [Show full text]
  • Nota Lepidopterologica
    ©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; download unter http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ und www.zobodat.at Nota lepid. 14 (2) : 179-190 ; 30.IX.1991 ISSN 0342-7536 Some Japanese genera and species of the tribe Euliini (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) Tosiro Yasuda* & Jözef Razowski** *College of Agriculture, University of Osaka Pref., 4-Cho Mozuumemachi, Sakai, Osaka, 591 Japan. **Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, 17 Slawkowska, 31-016 Krakow, Poland. Summary Two Asiatic Euliini genera, Drachmobola Meyrick and Protopterna Meyrick are characterised, and two are described : Dicanticinta gen.n. (for Tortrix diticinctana Walsingham) and Minutargyrotoza gen.n. (for Capua minuta Walsingham). All their known species are discussed or mentioned, and one is described : Protopterna eremia sp.n. A preliminary note on the tribe Euliini and some data on its non-Palaearctic genera are given. Résumé Identification de deux genres asiatiques d'Euliini : Drachmobola Meyrick et Protopterna Meyrick, et description de deux genres nouveaux de cette tribu : Dicanticinta gen.n. (pour Tortrix diticinctana Walsingham) et Mi- nutargyrotoza gen.n. (pour Capua minuta Walsingham). Toutes les espèces connues de ces genres sont présentées ou mentionées, et une nouvelle espèces est décrite : Protopterna eremia sp.n. Note préliminaire sur la tribu Euliini, avec quelques renseignements sur ses genres non paléarctiques. Introduction Obraztsov (1965) placed the genera Drachmobola Meyrick and Protopterna Meyrick in the tribe Cnephasiini. Common (1963) included at least two Australian genera in that tribe and redescribed Drachmobola strigulata Meyrick. Diakonoff (1975) transferred Drachmobola to the Epitymbiini, describing in it one unrelated species. Kuznetsov & Stekolnikov (1977) erected in the Cochylini a new subtribe Euliina to comprise two genera, viz., Eulia Hübner and Pseudargyrotoza Obraztsov.
    [Show full text]